2001 was the last year that Hollywood produced a good film

Really? I was a bit underwhelmed. I thought the pacing was poor, the characterisation wasn't great, the tension was so-so and the acting wasn't great. Decent cinematography though and some of the concepts were nice. But, you know, good you enjoyed it. For me it was okay, flawed but there were positives to take away.

Interstellar made me feel small, because in the vastness we really are. One of my top five favourite films.

I've seen Every Nolan film in IMAX since Inception and they've all been amazing movie-going experiences. Interstellar, Dunkirk and Oppenheimer are the top 3. You know they're great when you go back multiple times to see them!!

i watched it on acid once and now every time i rewatch it, i'm forced to tears at every high energy scene

That's bcuz the universe is dangerous. Not necessarily creepy, but EXTREMELY dangerous. Yet eerily so incredibly beautiful.

​@@ricaivory6571Honestly the thought of the aloneness and time travel you could experience sounds unnerving and creepy in some ways even though it's hauntingly beautiful.

@@theflowerhead you're scared but you wanna fly thru a supermassive black hole just to experience it.

Dont dare compare the Gravity trash with Interstellar

@@ah6169 it's not a crime to like both.

STAY WOKE

They literally look like dudes in monkey suits I wpildnt b surprised

lay off the pipe dude

There is a conspiracy , they don't want you to know the truth . Orangutans are sneaky and have a dark side...... ( cue haunting creepy music )🎶 🎵 "

Lmao

ikr.

Time is like that.

Literally watched this for the 1st time last weekend. Not sure why i wasted so long but damn was it worth it

it's 1 hour and 26 minutes in Miller's planet so not that old :)

I can't believe it's not butter!

Yeah, speaking in cosmic scales, the time dilation in orbit and on the planet would be so similar that there wouldn't be any percievable difference. Especially in orbit the ship is going in circles around the planet and thus experiencing stronger and weaker time dilation in equal measures thus nullifying any difference.

They only spent a few minutes on the planet, meaning that in order for 23 years to have gone by, they definitely did experience time dilation in the hours it took going to and leaving the planet

@@neoncat6820 not a bad assessment, but on the surface, where Cooper asks Brand how much their delay would cost, she replied, ‘decades’.

I always assumed the Endurance was put in an elliptical orbit around Gargantua, dropping off and picking up the lander as it passed by Miller's Planet but spending most of its time at a significantly higher altitude.

@@Laerei Except the gravity would have killed them way before there was any slowing in time! no that theres any black holes that can slow down time that much!

True, it's still a paradox though since he never would have gone to NASA if it wasn't for him sending the message to his past self

@@neoncat6820If humanity never escaped earth they never would have been able to provide the wormhole from the far distant future. If they never had the wormhole, they never would have escaped earth. Time paradoxes are pointless to argue about.

@@GuyN0ir indeed, this specific paradox is called a bootstrap paradox, in which an event which shouldn't be able to happen is caused by a time travel which only happened due to the event.

Yes, this movie gives me a very haunting sense of loneliness.

"Powerful and beautiful", and curious and inspiring it might be, but the bottom line is: Interstellar is a stupid person's idea of a *_smart_* movie.

@@bluceree7312 yes and no. I truly doubt that human kind will ever understand the whole complexity of the universe/multiverse. This movie is created for a wide audience. Maybe some rando gets so deeply fascinated with space, that he/ she will make the next huge breakthrough in that field.

@@bluceree7312 Aren't you just so edgy and intelligent.

Advanced beings from the future send a message back in time to certain heroes to put them on the right path so that the future will end up as it already was when they sent the message. Interstellar or Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure?

Wrong. You have a wrong image of a black hole, if the planet orbits at the perfect distance, which it would have to be anyway in order for us to live there, then it's the exact same thing, a black hole looks like a star to us, the disc is a visual representation of what they are, not of what they actually look like to us. The general visuals of this black ball with a warp of space around it moving like in space engine is not what they look like, they literally look like stars from the energy emitting around them and the hawking radiation coming from it. And the time only changes according to mass, so if the black hole was of the same mass as our sun, nothing would change. Plus distance, since a black hole the mass of our sun doesn't exist, it would be way slower there but we would be further away anyways, all our goldy lock zones are equal in time when speaking about stars and black holes. Because mass=energy but mass= gravity as well. Which meana whatever size something it, that energy will emit heat, which means the larger the further away, which in turn means faster time. Until ur in the habitable zone. Edit: lol people commenting to me saying the heat can be different but the radiation is not a factor since we would have to be at a further distance anyway, AND we still have amagnetic field either way. It evens it out. Y'all are funny.

If you google this "How can a civilization tell that their "Sun" is actually a black hole emitting hawking radiation?" You will find many answers and new ways for you to actually understand what goes on. I would send the link but i think Astrum has disabled links as spam so i won't even try, ima let you put in the effort if you wanna know. ❤

Why would it be different than orbiting a star if you exist in an orbit within similar gravitational "depth"? As well as if a planet has a magnetic field and atmosphere it would be the same as how earth blocks radiation from space and the sun.

I would assume the radiation to be extreme

@@christoffer886Depending on the distance tho, I think (but not sure) that the planet in Interstellar is too close.

Is what true? It's all made up. There's no facts. Just some people making a hypothesis and their peers saying "yea we agree, our very basic understanding of mathematics seems legit enough to back up your science fiction story." Anyone jump into a big made up black hole to gather the info you claim you understand?

True, the point at which spaghettification destroys an object/ person depends on the black hole's size. While for a relatively small black hole it may happen even before reaching the event horizon, for a supermassive one like in the movie Cooper could fall for 99% of the way from the event horizon to the singularity before being spaghettified.

Absolutely true, the larger the black hole, the smaller the tidal forces.

​@@Simon-dagreed with everything you said (though I thought the bh would have to be significantly larger even than Gargantua).

It's all a theory. So if it sounds smart just go with it. There's no one that can say you're wrong. For all we know there's just a star there so big light can't escape

Agree. I think the point in the movie was that advanced humans from the future intervene.

Yeah, Cooper and tars were brought into the wormhole by humans very far in the future, when they've evolved past the 3 dimensions we know.

not sympathetic, if they didn't do it a paradox would've happened

It was indeed advanced humans, they opened the original wormhole as well (it's implied)

@zentrocs That's what fun about closed time loops, I mean they have to start with SOMEONE'S conscious decision right? It's mind blowing to try and think about.

Hence the science fiction 😅

It’s only a time difference relative to an outside reference frame. Meaning if it takes 20 minutes to break orbit, then it always takes 20 minutes for the ship/those on the ship regardless of the amount of gravity or time dilation compared to the mother ship.

@@Yinzermakesvidsit’s actually not fiction. It’s how time dilation actually works. Like clocks on a GPS satellite only run slower relative to clocks on earth. 24 hours on a satellite still takes 24 hours to pass from its perspective. That’s why Cooper and Brand only experience a short time away vs the years Dr. Romilly experienced.

You're asking too complex questions. The ship would have been vaporized into oblivion as soon as it came closer to the accretion disk.

yeah they definitely "stretched" the amount of time dilation for going down to that planet and back. For the amount of gravity portrayed, the dilation should be a lot less, like maybe a few days (or even less) and not years. however, that would not "communicate" the efffect. "wow you fuys were gone for days". "actually it was only a few hours". "oh. ok"

😂😂😂

Nah, it was the gas my bum released.

Aww now people arnt allowed to talk about things

Its a joke lmao ​@@michaelmohler5409

Or 10 years early

You can never reach the event horizon of either a stellar mass or a SMBH.Mainly cuz you will never find a SMBH without a very nasty accretion disc of ionized plasma whipping around at 50% the speed of light that would vaporize you shortly after contact. Even for argument sake if you could find a SMBH that had no accretion disc or charge and wasnt spinning at all, once past the event horizon you would be in spacetime that is falling faster than light, and the ionizing radiation would fry you almost instantly. Even if thats not true given the non locality of spacetime expansion, I think the exact opposite is happening inside the event horizon.I think the contraction of spacetime is extreme to the point where there is no more up down left or right, only one direction toward the singualrity and it would appear to be all around you and closing in due to the extreme curvature of space. But most certainly, once across the event horizon, that point in space becomes an event in your past that you can no longer return to and all possible futures lead to you hitting the singularity.Just like you cannot avoid next Tuesday.

@@_BLACKSTAR_ Have you read a recent paper by Roy Kerr? It's too soon to speak of a scientific consensus but he makes a very compelling argument that singularities don't exist because the the movement of spacetime within and around a blackhole would be too extreme to allow for one. He argues that instead of a singularity you would have something like a 2 dimensional ring.

@@_BLACKSTAR_ "an event in your past that you can no longer return to and all possible futures lead to you hitting the singularity cannot avoid next Tuesday" This sounds so familiar. Did you learn this argument from Viktor Toth? I suggest not consuming answers from him uncritically. He more appropriately fits into the category of a physics hobbyist who likes to write about his hobby, or a proper science communicator, rather than a top professional physicist. Toth has a history of watering down many of the physics concepts, like those of QM for instance, to the point where they aren’t simplifications anymore, rather they are incorrect assumptions unrelated the theory and the math it's based upon.

@@_BLACKSTAR_ Like, I recall seeing some answers by him in which he alludes to the common view that quantum entanglement is nonlocal, and so must QM. But this is quite wrong. Entanglement is natural, its absence would require explanation. It is a natural byproduct of having tensor-product Hilbert spaces. In fact, the fraction of states in a many-particle Hilbert space that are not entangled is zero. Moreover, entanglement does not betray locality (be it relativistic or nonrelativistic). It has been proven that quantum is local. It's just that people have not known how to think about locality with measurements until this paper comes: Locality and error correction in quantum dynamics with measurement by AJ Friedman. But tbf, it's a recent paper, so these facts are hidden to both the physicist and the layman masses.

@@_BLACKSTAR_ Anyway, neither you nor him has bothered to read The Science of Interstellar to understand why Kip Thorne thought Cooper could survive the singularities and then construct a reason for why you reject it. You probably don't even know the types of theoretical singularities Gargantua harbors, or the type of black hole Gargantua is.

I agree, definetly in my top 5. The music is incredible and really adds to the movie. The "it's not possible. No, it's necessary" scene is a masterpiece all on its own.

then please watch the movie again and you will see, that the ship in orbit is in an orbit around the black hole. farther away from millers planet, not in orbit around millers planet

@@FuSoR1 I couldn’t remember, but I thought that might be the case - so in that case that lander has an absolutely absurd fuel supply, since it can not only land and take off and get back up to orbit without refueling, but even leave orbit. Absurd.

@@larrywalsh9939 Why you care? It's sci-fi movie only by advertisement. In reality it's a fantasy movie. You may listen to movie fans on fandom, I recite "Considering the blight is a mere plot device, it could be seen as a parable of the hardships faced by humanity in its History". In short, even fans of this movie understand impossible things are happening and it has nothing to do neither with science, neither with sci-fi.

Women always come between good friends.

Honestly im tearing up a bit. Life sucks man.

​@@SunBear69420are you the old friend??

@Sylar-451 i am not.. but i am in a very similar situation. My old best friend knows i love interstellar and astrum. But he wont talk to me. Ive tried for over 2.5 years to reach out and just het ignored

If you guys were my friends I would have stopped talking to you as well. Get a grip

Not only does he show what the transit would have been really like, but also answers SOOOO many more questions I had about the movie and explains the science behind it in such an amazing way that I love the movie even more than I did before! Watching it again tonight!! Go watch that video, everyone!

*Actually?* _Theoretically!_

He also did a book on the whole thing.

imagine a black hole being next to uranus... oh wait

But it's not a library, it's only Murph's bedroom? The suggestion is that is how it might appear if you had limitless access to all instants of Time - relating to [I presume] a finite period of time - where focussed on that particular exact portion of Space....It's all only the same, one, room - not a library. It reflects the same environment, over time - which means the same one wall, of the exact same shelving, and the exact same books that were ever on there - but only those exact same books.

@@lewis7515tbf, I don’t see how it’s impossible for there to be an infinite amount of these libraries of specific places in space throughout time

this is part 1 so naturally we can assume its coming

mining asteroids or meteors is practically useless, and non profitable for any firm, whether govt or private. Its just not worth it. The economics and finances would never balance out, and it would not profit anyone at all.

Oh a For All Mankind video? Great idea! I'd want him to break down the season 2 ending. That ending got me in the feels real hard. For All Mankind and The Expanse need some Astrum breakdowns!!

how about a large enough asteroid hitting our moon causing it to change orbit enough to cause Earth changing phenomena, like the tides rising much higher than normal henceforth.

🕳

interstellar is all the better for having imperfections, actually! It's a film where they say that love can transcend space and time and math, after all.. so if you love this film, why not take this story in the spirit it was told? love doesn't require perfection. It's all the more charming for its dips into science fiction.

@@otaku-chan4888 That's a pretty good interpretation

You describe me very well.😂😂😂 At least we saw in Corona times a depiction of our black hole in the milky way and it was actually Gargantua.

The Copenhagen interpretation explains perfectly all paradoxes in the film. As it is a film and we are observers of the single time line other realities collapsed after the first interaction from the future, so the appearance of the wormhole, forcing the loop to be completed. It doesn't deny the existence of free will so you can always make a googleplex (rather a smaller number because of Planc time) films with different scenarios, probably mostly about corn farming. Edit: After rethinking other decisions up to delivering the last crucial message had no importance. They were just making a reality with the wormhole appearance not existing.

Like what they did in avengers endgame

IIRC they saw it had water and wanted to see if it had life or was habitable? Or something like that.

Because P L O T. Which ultimately why this movie is overrated. The plot has some pretty stupid things that are jarring and make it really difficult to watch.

I would think the tidal forces would be pretty extreme even on people. Like squishing you every time the planets rotation put you closer/further from the black hole. But maybe it’s not a dramatic amount. Gravity goes on forever but the intensity of gravity fades out pretty quick.

Well said.@@aserta

i cringed so hard on a few things so yeah its plot@@aserta

My interpretation, which maybe is wrong, is that the wave was actually a tide due to the rotation of the planet and the gravity of the black hole. To be honest I didn't really worry about the details as it was quite a spectacular scene. My issue before then was just the idea of living on a planet orbiting a black hole. That just seemed like the mother of all mistakes.

"No way" can't argue with that.

I was more surprised they didn't see waves from space when trying to labs the ship. I figured the ripples would be seen from afar.

@@simmorg290 Unfortunately for me I'm analytical and can't help myself. Watching movies w me can be annoying.🤷‍♂

But it's not a wave? It's a tidal surge. Unlike a wave, it's not in motion - that's the reason it exists: so what are you expecting to, "break"?.. They, haven't, "gone wrong" - you, have misunderstood? _Cooper_ calls it a wave - but what does he know, or care? His imperative is to communicate the danger and get the hell out of there - it's _we_ who have the benefit of time to consider the circumstances and come to more rational conclusions.

no it would still happen it all depends on how far you are from the singularity. You wouldn't notice any significant spaghettification until you are near the singularity. The way the math works the event horizon for larger black holes would be no where near close enough for the spaghettification to happen unlike a stellar black hole or other dense object FYI you are technically experiencing spaghettification right now. the earth gravitational pull is stronger at your feet than your head assuming you are standing/sitting up. its just that its not strong enough to rip you apart

Nah Arrival did it better.

Not for supermassive black holes where the gradient can be quite low. Kip Thorne has written books about this and you could fall through the event horizon of a supermassive black hole (like at the centre of a galaxy) without noticing you'd passed the event horizon.

@@MikeMcCartney OK, thanks. I looked this up and you are quite correct. Strangely anti-intuitive, but the mathematics make it so. The Schwarzschild radius (the event horizon) is proportional to the mass of the black hole while tidal forces at the event horizon are proportional to the inverse of the square of the radius, so tidal forces become weaker as the mass and the diameter of the event horizon of the black hole gets bigger.

@@MikeMcCartney It's not possible. You cannot travel as fast as the speed of light which cannot escape the event horizon and you would die far, far before entering it.

Your mom sounds basic af

Ha, women! 😂

Its for science Rise above

😂 If he hadn't left, everyone, including his kid, would have been doomed.

The black hole itself wasn't indicated to be a construction, don't be ridiculous? What was indicated to be constructed was the tesseract net, just behind the event horizon, to catch Copper.

​@@lewis7515no, thor survived a nuclear star, so its likely he can survive that

No. Because when you're going out of time dialation, the faster-moving time decreases the amount of fuel you need.

​@@hopeseekr Really? To the planet and coming back? Getting out of our planet's or Sun's gravity well requires tons of fuel and the time distortion is negligible. FYI: I have no idea what I am talking about, just curious :)

@@jewymchoser The equation for fuel required is a combination of mass of the ship, gravity of the planet/star, and time. If time is massively dialated, so that 1 hour on the surface is like 10 years in near orbit, it means that time is drastically reduced in the equation the more you go up into space, thus requiring less fuel. Basically, it assumes the planet was already relatively less dense and most of the gravity we witness is from the pull of the black hole (thus the massive waves).

The waves are massive because, in part, they too are affected by time dialation. At 10 years to 1 hour, you can assume that at the top of the wave, time is moving substantially faster than at the bottom of the wave, resulting in less "effect of gravity", thus super tall.

There's a good stargate sg-1 episode where O'Neill is being pulled into a Stargate connected to a blackhole. He has to spend enormous amounts of energy (closer to the gravity well) to keep from being sucked in, but Teal'c is able to pull him up with way less force expended. Seems they did their research.

Same

Lol

Wait until you try mushrooms

I enjoyed this better than 2001. It's fun to look back at old sifi movies of the past. Have a Happy New Year

@@dianaroach3093fair enough, each to their own. Happy new year to you too.

And a drwho reference top tier

...and since we now live in a high-tech dystopian technocratic neo-feudal society, you sir are sentenced to death via Molecular Spagettification within Gargantua for blasphemy. ;)

Unlikely, but not impossible.

@@aresaurelian Technically if the universe is infinite then somewhere this is actually how everything happened

damn

how do you know ? nothing is proven . we know nothing about black holes , worm holes etc .. all speculation and guys with maths equations that create more question than answer

@@colinobrien3806 I wasn't talking about black holes and yes everything really said about black holes is just theory's I still like that in the movie they showed some of the theories. Of course some of it is science fiction, but it's still somewhat accurate

I felt that part was really contrived and silly, but I do understand why some people may like that part.

I liked the movie when I saw it in the theater, but the more I thought about it, the dumber I thought it was, especially the ending when "love" is the answer to everything.

its strange to me that you got the whole concept of making a film this size, but somehow fail to realize that it is a film and not a documentary. therefore, what is there to fall for? you either like it or not, but please - don't look for answers in a hollywood blockbuster.

I personally like the movie, but I respect the opinion of somebody going against the grain and actually having their own opinion.

@@markuskenel I like Sci-fi. Favorite is Star Trek (the old shows). The science bits in ST is not even close to being accurate, but they don't claim to be. Even still, it influenced so much of our culture and even products because it was ahead of its time. Interstellar is the total opposite of that. The only think I liked about it were the visuals which are stunning. As a movie in general: the story is not my cut of tea with a lot of plot holes (unrelated to science), acting was ok, music was good, science was lacking as explained in the video and even though it was consulted by Kip Thorne.

Where Astrum Went Wrong!

Gartantua is my favourite black hole

Thanks!

Thanks!

​@@HighlandRockfoil Your mom is my favorite black hoel

That's called real life... or Sci-fi!

I knew I would find atleast one comment about sols rng

​​@@sussycracksame😂

I hope you never get a global

Hans Zimmer is overrated