And why the h*ll is he supporting the boyfriend and their baby?? Number 1 that woman is in a day dream Number 2 How can a self respecting man want another man to pay for him and his child. Are they serious???

one word. Woman.... lol

You said self respecting lol 😂​@janetmoquin7828

I agree! Why should this man be paying her any child support! It makes no sense!

Because there is an inherent bias in the system. The laws continue to favor women, even though they are capable of working. In time past, women worked as “homemakers.” The laws have yet to make this bias equal. Women want equal rights, so they should have equality across the board. His house… his kids… she didn’t and doesn’t work. Her 5 year vacation is over. She may be rethinking her decision to divorce.

big facts

Agree that she got real greedy and thinking it was even possible constitutes a broken system. Though the Judge saw through it and broke one off in her. Which is a win for society.

No it isn't as she is being requested to leave the home. This is what court is for...did you not watch the video? The man should have NEVER left the house. He probably did change his mind when the other man moved in.

​@@ST-rj8iuif she waited till after the divorce she would have gotten way more. But to get pregnant while married. She fumbled the bag

No fault divorce is a must in EVERY western country but let's start with the USA and Canada.

I agree but the homeowner is a little naive, he let his ex-wife bring another man into his home right after they divorced claiming that he was a friend... Men, please stop falling for that junk. I mean that was an obvious con 😂😂😂

@@ssgemactv We all know that these 'friends' are boyfriend's.

@@ssgemactv I don't think they were even divorced yet, she ask for a divorce. The custody of the children and Marital asset, alimony, - hearings comes before you get the divorce. He was smart enough to get a lawyer, which was a good move on his part. He is Primary/ Custodian of the children, and she didn't get alimony or the home. But she became the non-custodian parent, I don't think she saw that one coming.

None of that matters and judges will normally side with the woman no matter how terrible they obviously are. This is one of the few times i have seen actual justice come out of a courtroom, but the sad thing is she will likely borrow money from someone to get a lawyer and have all of this reversed. We are supposed to be equal but women enjoy MANY benefits from our legal system and commonly cheat on men, have a court render the men unable to support themselves, and throw them to the wolves/threaten them with consequences constantly if they fail to meet the ex's demands. You wonder why so many men remove themselves from existence, lol.

@@47ravenlord you may be right on quite a few things, but she did make a mistake, and I don't think she saw it coming- the judge signed off on the first part giving the father Primary/ Custodian over the children. She's the non- Custodian parent.

Yup

Trust me he has another woman somewhere.

The reverse baby trap. Knock a dude's ex-wife up and move into his house.

Yep! She really screwed up, shouldn’t assume grass is greener on the other side when it often isn’t

Exactly

Yes!!!

It's only one the other is from a nother dude and he took her and her kid in waited 5 years got board and filed for divorce was living good for 5 mouths so in reality he only had to take care of her a month for every year thanks not bad she did it to her self if she could've keep her legs closed bitches would be happy but she didn't lol almost had her one

1000% agree 👍 she has 3 different babies daddies

Chances are high that the past children are not his either.

If they were conceived while married, in some states, that DNA doesn't matter. Crazy as it sounds....I've been thru it with my husband and a previous girlfriend of his.

I agree 100 percent

Oh most definitely ❤

Except that she didn't point out he shouldn't be paying anything in child support since the kids live with him 50% of the time. Child support is for non-custodial parents. That means a parent where the child only lives with them 30% of the time. That's why child support is 20% of income. 20 + 30 equals 50. His lawyer should have pointed out he shouldn't be paying this woman anything!

The lawyer is 🔥

@@MamaMOBsometimes you got to take a win when u get it afterwards he can try for that

This is shocking!! This is why you get a good lawyer, fellas. These types of cases almost always go in favor of the female. Kudos to this judge. Although the female in this case, made it easy for the judge . What a dumb move to get pregnant AND move your broke boyfriend in. If not, for these two things, she probably would’ve been awarded at least temporary possession of the marital home.

Am so glad she gave him back his home

Goes to show.....if you do not allow consequences for a Promiscuous Woman, she will continue in her debauchery at YOUR expense.

@@j.taylor822 his lawyer is great

Of course she did, women are usually who file for that. My brother did, but it was unusual as my former sil cheated and abandoned the family.

The Judge did the right thing by booting her out! But the Judge should have done more. IMO, the Judge should have given him full custody of his kids, until she can show she can support herself at a minimum. You have to remember, this lady doesn't even work. Unless her new boyfriend can support her, she likely going to homeless or in housing which will likely be too small for all her kids and boyfriend.

He isn’t paying her child support. He is paying the state back for part of the welfare his wife and her kids are getting from the state. I think that was the TANF reference. (Yep. I checked. The internet says this is a Washington state program Temporary Assistance for Needy Families.) That is why the state statute assumes only 32 hours per week and minimum wage for his wife and doesn’t allow home credit.

He let his kids be supported by welfare half the time so he isn't as virtuous as people seem to be thinking

As crazy as it sounds, even with split custody the party making the money would be required to pay support if the other one has no income. Min boggling but true

Yes brother dealing with something similar to this

It was only no alimony because the marriage was less than 7 years. Men are still screwed in family court, unfortunately.

Amber Lowe is a gross person

Poxy woman. F-ed around, and found out.

To all dads document everything, digitally track and save receipts. Ppl that think like this do not deserve to be a parent! I pray for all of you dealing with this, justice is served and you and your babies are protected

she deffinately ran off to be with the "new guy".

Give some people a shovel....

Since her ex is a sex offender he should not be working because you know sex offenders bad so she should be getting a reduction in child support based on what his income is going to be at a minimum wage job assuming he can get a minimum wage job because you know sex offenders shouldn't be working according to our society they should be punished. Funny how these women dig holes that people can't get out and then they cry foul once again showing that accountability is a woman's kryptonite

​@@3centpickle626💯

She also left the child that she had with a previous boyfriend. Wild

I was just thinking the same thing

Right I saw her like o no then she ruled that room I wish I had her back in the day

It's Washington state. Happens all. the. time.

It is most modern women's dream life.

Yeah Washington state is a very liberal state. No decency left here.

@@sentientmicrowave259lol no….. you’re confused. just because a woman wants to work and have some independence doesn’t mean this

@@skyt3265na. She would have left and made her own life. Modern women are wretched

Maintaining the home has nothing to do with credit. It's the payments that will ruin his credit.

@@billyyank5807 I don’t understand your response. The house is in his name, if the payments are late or not made it all, that info is reported to credit bureaus by all lenders on a monthly basis. I suspect he wanted to ensure the payments were made every month on a timely basis, instead of leaving it up to the soon to be ex wife.

The down payment for the home was inherentence from his family. She does not deserve it.

She couldn't pay any bills but he should trust her to pay the mortgage. That probably saved him right there.

@@mongolordofdarkness exactly! I worked in the mortgage loan servicing business for over 20 years. I can’t tell you the number of delinquent accounts, that one person is responsible for paying the bills, the other was naively and totally ignorant of what was actually happening. If we only spoke to the wife we would demand to speak to the husband. Many times they were clueless that they were in financial straits.

Men pay. W men leech. That's why

Cause she forced him out, he can make her boyfriend pay him rent because the house is all his.

@jivonniasmith9770 Unfortunately that’s not how it works. His mistake was leaving, once you leave it’s considered an abandonment, no matter if she hollered for him to go and “kicked him out.” He left voluntarily and that overrides everything else.

IMHO, being she has no way to support herself, and there's no issue with domestic violence on his part. He should get 100% custody of his kids. When she can support herself, with a job, and are able to see the kids, she can the petition the court for some kind of custody.

​@chrlpolk, that can't be true because the judge gave him back the house.

Sounds about right thats alot of x

Hell to the NO

The mortgage was probably in his name. Unless he wants to really mess up his credit and lose whatever equity that was in the house, he was pretty much forced to keep paying.

​@@crabjoe huh... Why wasn't the wife on the mortgage?

@@the_inquisitive_inquisitor You tell me. I have no clue as there can be many reasons to only have one person on any kind of loan.

@@the_inquisitive_inquisitor they could’ve been dating when he bought the house and he used his inheritance money to buy it. They probably got married after the home was bought and that’s very smart. If you’re dating don’t put both of your names on the house that they aren’t putting money up for.

And she’s getting government assistance

Does that mean he's a full-time gamer

He should put the house up for sale.

@@MichaelBoyer-lm8bw Or maybe something like OF with the ex wife being the star? lol paying for your own wifes adult career.

Restrict the websites via the router ;) Only allow child-friendly content between the hours of 4pm - 6 pm.

sadly most kids needs internet for homeowrk now and not having it for a full week could cause some real distress to the kids....

In the previous video, she said she was receiving them.

She about to lose the kid too on December 5 she was giving his attorney a chance to file for sole custody of the kid he going to get it unless she got a place to stay and a job but we know better than that and the court date is 2 weeks after she have to leave she got 6 weeks she was bold ass hell wow

😂😂😂 Absolutely hilarious!

....'and pay for my new baby daddy too...😂' ...she flexible alright.. That's the BIGGEST flex on earth....

WTF!!!

She was very flexible, so much that she got pregnant by her new friend!

That also seriously undermined the SA claim; which mother would leave her children with a man who assaulted her? Especially if not all of those children are even his.

​@p.s.shnabel3409... Correct !

This actually happens when the woman leaves the kids with the abusive spouse. However, I don't think this happened to her. I think she's lying.

This actually happens when the woman leaves the kids with the abusive spouse. However, I don't think this happened to her. I think she's lying.

Women use this lie all the time to gain more financial support. The courts automatically take them at their word, with zero evidence. I had this happen to me. Had to jump through all kinds of hoops.. Had to pay for psych evaluations, and all kinds of crap. And because my income was higher, I not only had to pay for mine, but hers too! This was already on top of the CS I was paying. IMO, it should have stopped when her psych eval came to non-conclusive, but nope. The courts just kept wanting and trying to give her custody.. Until I got a new Judge that put a stop to it.

My favorite is how she says he raped her but she didn't cry out, didn't say anything, didn't tell him to stop, nothing. Now she's claiming that she did but clearly the judge isn't buying it. Especially with how she's acting. A woman who has been raped doesn't go out and have sex with another man and get pregnant. They stop having sex for a time and have intimacy issues usually. And they often are very fidgety and nervous. She looked entirely calm and self-controlled.

Classic make him look like the bad person

So, he pays for ALL expenses involving the house and the people living there (inclusive kids that are not his, and the new boyfriend of his ex), BUT can`t live there AND also does get no credit for it so that he ADITIONALLY has to pay 1000 bucks in child support for his children? (And alimony, if his ex got it her way!) No wonder the judge finds this outrageos. This said, there are some judges out there that not only would allow it, but would crucify the dad for his alleged "abuse" This man at least has a chanche.......... Lady, time to get your but of the sofa and GET A JOB!

me too! this woman is disgusting what she is asking for.Alot of guys get wrecked because of lowlife women

Agree

You brother does have responsibility to the child he fathered no matter the circumstances. That said I do agree women in general have a higher degree of responsibility when it comes to sex and who they have it with. Men are consistent, anytime, anywhere any woman. Women must remember they are the ones who get pregnant, carry and raise the child if father disappears. I this case I see the moved in boyfriend disappearing when his free room, board & bed partner evaporate. After the Judges ruling for her to move out I would not put it past this woman to turn the charm back on and try to get back into good graces with her husband. I think she was the hard to get along with person who wanted or forced the divorce who will do anything to get back on the gravy train.

Cheating without protection?

She would pay it with the money she requested from him.

​@@angelsofblood9879 so, he's still paying but now she gets to touch the money..?

Fluffy lions mane kitty!😻

Her thinking is just selfish and to have your boyfriend that you’re now pregnant by live in the house around your children gosh yuck

In Sweden, it is.........

Shes saying that to prevent him to move back into the house

I doubt it was regret sex. She probably did it to keep him on the hook. It was manipulative sex.

@@jorgebarriosmurNo wonder Swedish men are grabbing their passports and traveling east.

She didn't even regret it. She's just weaponizing it to get sympathy

yeah shes on point.

If I were to guess, I'd say the ex wife will drag her feet and cry victim when she's eventually evicted.

He had to give her a month for every year that's not bad and next court date he getting the kids that's two weeks after she got to leave 6 weeks to get a job is fair or have the new guy take care of you but if she don't have a place to stay he gets the kid and she can't even get child support at that point because she came there to try and get the 1700 and odd change from him ended up homeless great job judge

Not fatherless, if she could find him to do the deed, she can get a support judgment against fool #1.

Why doesn't she have legal council? Isn't because she can't afford it. She probably has some initial consults and they all told her the same. She has no case. So she is playing the damsel in distress and hoping with a female judge she will get by on pure sympathy. But I'll be honest. If I was the dad in the middle of this I'd be getting a paternity test. This lady checked out the marriage probably a month into it.

​@@superdave8248She already had one child. She found a sucker. Made 2 more kids. Went back to her boyfriend and tried to finish stealing the house. I think that was her intention at all points in the relationship.

​@@superdave8248💯💯💯

@@michaelplunkett8059and fool #2 and fool #3. I see a pattern here on her part.

Exactly what I was thinking... she's perfectly capable of getting a job, therefore she doesn't qualify...and if she's now essentially homeless, the father should be awarded custody of the children, even if it's temporary, and that would also disqualify her for benefits...

Even if you're capable of a job, u still qualify. U can only receive 36 months of tanif for life. I'm assuming she received it for the 1st child she isn't receiving child support on

@@danielleburke87you qualify for food stamps and medical, NOT cash. AND her new baby daddy should’ve been on her case because he’s in the house. That’s FRAUD

Yea I was gonna say usually how it works is you get more benefits the less money you make from ie; a job hence maybe why she doesn’t want to work 😬

The time limit is 60 months of TANF, before an extension is considered. Her IRP should include some type of job searching or obtaining employment.

Which is a huge flaw with the system IMO. Your ability to get a fair and reasonable out come shouldn't come down to your ability to pay for a lawyer. For some context I knew someone whose lawyer dropped her because he moved to a bigger firm that required a 10000 retainer be maintained at all time. While he was her lawyer he botched her case because frankly he was overworked, stretched thin and working for peanuts. Her ex on the other hand got a great lawyer. Not the best he could afford but the best she could afford. Imagine being told by a judge that you not only loss but that you need to come up with a little over 1000 to pay your unemployed ex husband's legal fees or go directly to jail.

Exactly my reaction, too. If I were to guess, she did what I've seen in other cases. First she picks a fight, then she claims she has to stay with family/friends ... when in reality she's going to her boyfriend. Once her boyfriend has had enough of her shenanigans and kicks her out, she goes back. She'll also spread rumors about the husband being abusive to her own circle of friends. Rinse and repeat.

To be fair, marital abuse ≠ child abuse, especially if she was claiming marital rape.

@@mollycollins498 All the more reason to take the children with her. If the man has already proven himself willing to commit SA against the woman he claims to love, then what would stop him from being horrible to children (and one of which not even his). I certainly wouldn't want my offspring to be left alone with a criminal.

There is no evidence that he committed AS , she claimed he did no more than he said , he said

Shes a narcissist

This makes it even worse that she doesn't have a job. 2 months means she still is physically capable for most jobs

She is - she was getting TANF, but only because she didn't disclose she was also getting money from the dad every week and her bills paid. She's a scammer.

Through welfare 😂the lady Amy Powers said they are paying her $1787/mo

Really? Uncle Sam. This makes me sick. She needs to get a job like the rest of us!

If both of them are on the mortage, she simply would cease to pay, and screw her credit (wich she probably don`t care about) and that of her ex. My brothers ex did it to him. She kept the house under the promise that she would pay the mortage. When she simply stopped paying (while living there with her new boyfriend) the bank went after my brother (who was not allowed to withdraw his name from the mortage). He ended up paying the whole sum, plus fines and taxes, becuase she, simply didn`t give a sh*t Get a wife they said......have children they said........

You mean she sounds like a modern day woman? 😂

You are right I got so fked yra ago. But he won big time

@Gooey124 I agree in this case, but let's not group all woman in that. I am a woman and would never, ever do that

@@teresabrewer2661lol sure that’s what they all say . Never ever trust what a women says . Too unstable and emotions run their thoughts and decision making .

She’s a class act that’s for sure

He sure can pick em. 😅

It's sad when they have kids so their welfare will increase. Unfortunately, I know a female just like this who bitches all the time how the SNAP program doesn't give her enough($1,000 a month) when she has been under declaring her income and failing to report her current boyfriends income since he lives in her house as that would significantly reduce her SNAP money. But it's all good because Karma got her when the IRS audited her ass. Some people are just a leach on society.

That heifer is the definition of TOXIC

Ha you nailed it

You are wrong. A heifer is a cow that has never been bred. She is more of a used up milk cow. The rest of what you said is spot on..

​@@notsofresh8563 close, but not quite correct. Generally speaking in the dairy industry a heifer is a female that has not yet had its first calf born. Once the calf is born and the mother has started producing milk it is then referred it to as a cow. Generally speaking in the beef industry they will refer to the female as a heifer until it is pregnant with its second calf. Even after the first calf is born the female is referred to as a first calf heifer. Occasionally some dairy farms use the same terminology, but it is far less common. The point is that never having been bred is not the delineation between a heifer and a cow.

@@byronmill That is regional terminology. Official definition is never borne calf. Look it up. Checked with my pops who taught animal science and specifically bovine repro at a college level for 30 years. Rumour has it he taught half the province of Alberta artificial insemination for dairy cattle and also horses for pregnant mares urine.

Exactly! She has balls and he doesn't. He should have never allowed her "friend" to move in. Bottom line.

​@@Rebecca-hc5juAgreed

He should have never got caught up with her as she already had multiple BD's then he pops her with one and now this new BD. He must've been blind to not have seen the pattern with her and all the red flags before he married her.

​@@roymartin3002you assume the kid is actually his.

Talk about disrespect man oh man

Courts can't get child support from the jobless mom.

@@icanhazgoodgame3845if she doesn’t have the kids she has no reason not to work full time

The Court needs to eat

beacuse courts are sexist is why. This is a clear cut case proving that. Or Courts think that low of mothers that they cannot take care of their kids part time and handle a job. So much for feminism and sexes being equal......

​@@eachonereachonethe courts themselves don't need to eat, they just don't want freeloaders on government hand outs, they want to transfer that responsibility to the men that talk to these women.

So true surely if he was as abusive as she claims wouldn't she have been the one being "forced" to vacate

Good!

Rapid blinking 😂

These women love the bad boys, while the good guy gets screwed!

Because she loves dead beats. Not uncommon for women to "have their fun" with men they know won't be a father to their kids. If the man has no money, or is to just too dangerous like being a criminal they don't ask for anything. Don't even put the mans name on the birth certificate etc. They only look at men like the ex husband for his money and home. It seemed to be a fairly short term marriage before she divorced and/or cheated on him. She just wanted the house.

Not to mention since dad is already paying for everything, that lady at the state wants him to pay back all the state support. She should have to pay it back herself!!

Wrong Pam She deserves nothing

Only if affordable childcare is available. Simply impossible to work with children without daycare

So.....average modern western woman??

@@gomahklawm4446 modern Indian woman

I'm an older woman and I am amazed every day at the extent women have lost their ever loving minds. When God is trivial and irrelevant so is the family unit. Lives used to be mostly fulfilling and happy.

No it's cause he asked her to take the trash out, now she's traumatized

That's a stunningly common attitude.

Lawyers tell women to do that

Even after the Johnny Depp case they still try. Just throwing shit at the wall and hope it sticks. It's 2024, men are victims too. This woman is abusive

@@user-bo6gp4rw6b Yep abuse should only be considered with video and unrelated witnesses evidence.

One and a half 😂 The oldest and the one on her belly 😅

Wrong. Child support is based on income and factors in the time spent with both parents, among other factors. The goal is to equalize the households. But listen to how the State lady said they imputed the wife income based on minimum wage at 32 hours a week. They don’t tolerate parents not working anymore.

@@user-gc4zy2sr2greal confident wrong. But it ain’t right. It all depends on the state. Washington does factor in both incomes for instance. Texas doesnt play these games.

She probably played on his sympathy re having a child w a man not helping her. So she is in the house and he married her and she does this. She has zero ability to see how awful she is.

The "It's fine, I'm on birth control" grift.

The supposed guys that got her pregnant should not sleep around, too. Very telling of the other fathers, too. It takes two to tango, never forget that. Infidelity laws need to be enforced, and 10 year jail time would end the player mentality on both sides.

She is playing the system for sure.

@@KeepItReal1She probably doesn’t even know who the fathers are

@@vinsanity982 Nor do the fathers care to know, as always. Deadbeats

Actually I understood she has 1 from the first relationship, 2 by her husband and 1 on the way from the current deadbeat. So 4 in total eventually. Unbelievable she thinks this is somehow acceptable.

New boyfriend will be gone in six months. Pump and dump.

Or at least help out with expenses!

I was wondering about that. Did she sleep with a homeless man OMEGALUL

Not really. I think she still gave way too much leeway to the lady. This lady provided no documentation to the court other than a response to the petitioner's request. No financials, nothing on the children, nothing.

Well she was a sahm. Her job was taking care of the kids for years. So she still should get "paid" for taking care of the kids after the divorce. However she messed up when she cheated and got pregnant with another man while still married.

@@mewtwomotherfuka You think people should be paid for taking care of their own children? What planet do you live on?

@@mewtwomotherfukaWell a stay at home mom is paid in love, and you get as much of that as you deserve, maybe even more in most cases. To think be able to stay at home and raise your kids is a privilege, yet too many ppl who do that get bored with their lives and feel they deserve something better and end up cheating on their significant other. Now I’m not saying that it is a bad thing to be a stay at home parent as my mom was one for half my childhood after she had my siblings and once I got into middle school she went back to work part time & then full time. However that was only because my dad had a good job and work a lot and also did side work on weekends and what not doing repair work. So if my parents had split you think my dad should of continued to work all the time if my mom had decided that she didn’t want to work and just leech off of him?!?!? I love my mother and would put her up against any mother on the planet, however she didn’t need to stay at home and if she had been a woman like this woman I would have lots a ton of respect for her and prolly would also have lost a ton of respect for women in general as a consequence of her actions. Which is something that only seeing how entitled & bad modern women r these days that has me questioning in way I never really thought possible. So entitled & disrespectful now….. Smfh

@@mewtwomotherfukashe shouldn’t get paid to be a sahm. She needs to get a job!

They look at both incomes and try to “even” it out

Stop cursing its a sin dude

😂🤣😂🤣

TANF-cash assistance gave her $1787/mo according to Amy Powers who works for the state.

I think her plan was to pay her portion with his own child support payment. But the difference is he would be court ordered mandated to pay his share. She wouldn't be.

​@@ObeyDaqSwaqqshe can't receive TANF and 5k child support per month. Sounds like she was frauding the system.

​@@ObeyDaqSwaqqwhaaat!??

Exactly WTH🤔🤷‍♀️

Fax 😤

He did. She was ordered to move out.

That's exactly what he did

Bruh I would of never left my shyt unless ordered to. Tf she think this is.

Probably trying to file a motion for that one too😂😂😂

Sounds like she dug her grave, now it's time to lay in it.

It all depends where you live in Minnesota. I'm the mom I made $30,000 a year 2 kids full custody because Dad did not want any responsibility .Dad made $80,000 a year as a plant manager his child support amount was $167 per month . I owned the home prior to the relationship and I also cover all dental and medical premiums and out of pocket. We had a female judge .

That's been gradually changing for the past several years due to increased awareness of the skewed family court system.

😂😂😂