Thankfully socialists like Orwell are growing in number today after decades of stagnation

Like Hitler right. Lmao dumb meaningless orwellianisms.

@@danilthorstensson8902 Like in Russia walking into their death of 50 million...Socialism is suicidal.

George Orwell never wrote or said that. It’s contemporary writer from the American Thinker who did, you can easily look it up!

orwell lmfao

Only as long as he defends Globalism, as soon as he stops he will be an "idiot" to the same Globalist's. That's how this works.

He's an emotionalle

He tells himself he is

@@donnasherwood283 my 5 year old son is Spiderman! 🕷️🕸️🕷️

Only intelectuals can be this dumb.

Wrong. Bannon doesn't know what he's talking about. Deride Levi's style all you like, but he isn't a charlatan or grifter attempting to mislead ignorant people for his own benefit - as Bannon is doing.

@@canteluna Well, my comment is based solely on this debate. Not upon any opinion reflecting my political bias. Bernard not only exhibited a shameful lack of debate capacity but, even worse -a great deal of hypocrisy. He pretended to be more sensible to human problems than his opponent (and not only in this case, but against Dugin too), and to be above any ideological identification when is very clear which interests he represents. Just taking one example of his stupid behavior in this debate, what on earth he had to bring into his arguments the fact that Trump humiliated Bannon and his supposed "pity" of him because of it... Has that any thing to do with the theme at issue? And of course, he was lying about his sympathy.

@@apocalipsereich6997 You're rotten-cherry-picking. What I care about, and what anyone with good faith should care about, is the world view, the facts and lies presented by each debater. Dismissing Levi's entire position because you didn't like his style of debate has nothing to do with the substance of his position. You're either not listening to the substance or you should admit that your bias is toward a man who is clueless - but I admit, he sounds confident and knowledgeable. However, Bannon is a liar and not only are his views incorrect but they are dangerous to anyone who takes them at face value. Read any respected expert on geopolitics and you will hear Bannon's views contradicted. Bannon is a grifter who makes a living from spouting right wing propaganda that ignorant people want to hear.

@@canteluna Again, I'm just fact checking two arguments standing for two world views in a debate. And YES! One can "dismiss the entire position in a debate" based on the performance, because, to begin with: that's the objective of a debate - to proof the soundness of a given opinion, argument, world view, ideology... So why not to take it like a good measure of the veracity of those positions? If you are not on the Bannon political shore, that's OK. But that doesn't mean you overlook the errors of Bernard... And there were legions! Besides, what is so special about his world view? He represents interests just as Bannon does.

@@apocalipsereich6997 It's obviously up to you if you want to dismiss content due to style. But do tell where BHL is wrong in his thesis.

theyre both shills for israel...this is all Belt-and-Road project material

@@rickacton7540 how so?

@@amanshoraka6447 "how"? what do you mean "how"?

@@rickacton7540 obvious

Levy is totally out , he can only function among his own ,where everyone is taking in the same way, munching on the same thought, using slogans only.. Levy's type don't think on their own , every thought is collective and no one deviates from the script.

And Bannon is too. He doesn't give a damn about working folks and the terror of globalism.

Yeah, watched a lot of the Nexxus videos. Constant Trump bashing. Because we are all racists. Obviously.

Not really. How is that a double standard, when clearly the Russian government is pro agression and exclusion while it is le Pen who is pro agression and exclusion in France.

@@thesilkpainter so france deciding theyre gonna attack a sovereign nation and have a regime change is totally fine, but if anybody disagrees theyre somehow "pro aggression"? that bernard guy is an obvious clown and thinks if you dont agree with him youre anti democratic and unpatriotic.

It isn't a double standard. You're conflating a one-size-fits-all principle with what should be a case-by-case approach to geopolitics.

@@canteluna if its not double standard, its an absurd expectation that he wants a russian national/nationalist to share his geopolitical views and goals... that would be like if dugin asked him to condemn french presidents attack on soverign nations of syria and libya, but then in another debate questions the patriotism of any russain whos critical of the conflict in ukraine and calls them foreign agents.

Sorry but Bannon does not feel comfortable from the beginning to the end. The truth is that we can say poor Steve, not more than that.

Not sure it was intentional. A lively debate and too many important points to address for the time there was. That said, I would have like to hear far more on that issue.

@Luis Rz lol you’re clearly delusional. And probably have a lot of internet friends 🤣

Do you know the definition of anachronism?

Bannon is a liar, charlatan. He exists to exploit your ignorance.

Dugin is the goat. I can't believe him and Zizek haven't had any conversations tgt

@@aminmoghadam9632 Dugin is an idiot and an Islamic apologist.

Name-calling ? I don’t think we saw the same footage, Lévy did not use any names against his opponents.

I agree.

@@aminmoghadam9632 And now his fascist daughter is dead lol

Wrong. Bannon is the liar here. Deride Levi all you like, but he isn't a charlatan or grifter attempting to mislead ignorant people for his own benefit - as Bannon is doing.

Prove it.

@@canteluna omg, you are obsessed!! Steve Bannon lives in your head rent free!! You are everywhere and keep repeating the same, the same!! Your have impressive education!!

@@go5124 A lot of misinformation exists in everyone's head - they pay for it, I don't.

Levy is not a moralist. Probably you are. Levy knows how to point out the darkest part of Bannon. And Bannon is a really dark personality. Bannon is uncomfortable and shows himself very weak. His speech is inarticulate. He can only be self confident if the audience thinks exactly like him. A dangerous personality.

@@lrzezak Don't be afraid son, come join the dark side

@@ihatepunkers1243 Thanks, enjoy yourself!

The short form is: he cries out while he strikes you.

@@aristochat3 No, he doesn't strike. But he's like a fucking crazy chick who wants you to go around picking a fight with any random bloke that looks at her wrong, except the ones who are actually a danger to her.

The informed and passionate Levi vs Bannon, the dissembler and grifter.

Agree 100

How about me? I could wipe the floor with Bannon. I'll debate anyone here.

levy says he wants the US to be nice, then 5 seconds later says we need to confront China, Syria, etc etc lolol

Quite a lot of facist comments on this democracy forum

@@olivierfouassier6495 and all the defender of “democracy” has is moral outrage

Democracy is not a bureaucratic process or institution. Democracy is the power of the people to act as a coherent mass which defies the Open Society, Davos, Bilderberg so-called champions of democracy.

Well put.

Bullshit. typical stereotypic geopolitics

Someone who lies as much as Steve Bannon should not be handed a fucking microphone.

@@JohnWilliams-channel wahhhh wahhhh

@@bulzome664 Hey, I am immune to his bullshit. I can't vouch for the rest of you idiots.

Wrong. It's impossible to know how much Russian lies about Clinton effected the election - my own guess is probably not so much. But it is also just as unfalsifiable for Bannon to claim that Hilary's loss was because she didn't go to Michigan and Wisconsin - I don't think it would have mattered. The Hilary brand has been in the toilet since before she ran against Obama. It is NOT a conspiracy to say that Russia interfered in the election, they did. It was proven by the Mueller report. And it is laughably rich for Bannon to talk about accepting loss in an election when he is one of the biggest LIARS in regard to Trump losing. Anyone who takes Bannon seriously is a dupe. He is a charlatan and a grifter. I could kick his ass in a debate. Don't believe me, debate me in a proxy debate. You be Bannon I'll be (a more informed version of) Levi.

@@canteluna What Russian lies? As if the Clintons are not corrupt?

r

I'll debate you.

Me? 'bou wha? Lol

@@bramblebop1904 Just the response I would expect from a Bannon devotee.

Oh

Bannon thinks diversity is weakness. That's why he is spreading fascist disinformation.

Wrong. Bannon doesn't know what he's talking about. Deride Levi's style all you like, but he isn't a charlatan or grifter attempting to mislead ignorant people for his own benefit - as Bannon is doing.

they're both intellectual frauds in the sense that they are pugilists for a cause rather than seekers of truth. I agree more with Levy, but I'd much rather hang out with Bannon

@@ChannelMath Levy is an ideologue and so doesn't seem to see his own biases. One can ignore such a character. Bannon, on the other hand, wants to burn the system down and there is no limit to the depths of depravity to which he'll sink to in order to achieve his end. Even now, he's pumping out the piss for loser, Kari Lake (how I hope Trump picks her or MTG for a running mate!). Bannon demands we reckon with him, and I hope the justice department will do just that. Btw, when you're hanging out with Bannon, do the world a favor and slip some arsenic into his koolaid.

@@JohnWilliams-channel globalist shill

Yes. They know their time under the spotlight is over.

Let's hope

Idiotic ASSertions like yours are why the West is in such big trouble.

One of my heroes ... he will never get the recognition and credit for what he has done for this country..President Trump never would of won...

I'm glad that my son is finding out and hearing about Globalists, for the first time in his life, thanks to Steve Bannon with Vox, in Spain. Otherwise he never understood what I was talking about. Thanks to Steve Bannon for that.

Yeah he did a great job losing the House the Senate and the Presidency. Well done Steve! Keep talking your idiocy

Bannon is a more informed and articulate version of Trump, but like Trump, he throws out so much bullshit that it is hard to correct it all.

You weren't listening. But I'll debate you.

Hold on! We hate him too!

of course he does

At least he doesn't lie. Bannon exists to exploit your ignorance.

He is Jewish, not French !!!

Not a French typical at all, he is an agent of Israel, he's got nothing of a French, and it's a French telling you that. This guy is a shame for our country

Too bad you idiots are all concerned with style instead of substance. Bannon is a charlatan, a liar, a dissembler. If you knew anything about geopolitics you'd flush Bannon down the toilet where he belongs.

Deride Levi's style all you like, but he isn't a charlatan or grifter attempting to mislead ignorant people for his own benefit - as Bannon is doing.

@@canteluna I think that's exactly what he is. Rather unconvincingly, he delivers the standard, pro-globalist rhetoric but then avoids having to defend it by speaking way too much, while saying little. His logical fallacies alone would lose him a school debating competition. He's a Globalist Functionary.

@@KCavan Personally, I wouldn't put up Levy as a speaker for the global order, I would put up Peter Zeihan or Kevin Rudd who are extremely knowledgeable, and not histrionic and would wipe the floor with the charlatan Bannon. Before dismissing "globalists" as elitist evil-doers, as Bannon does, you should learn what globalism actually is and how we all benefit from it. if you want to debate the subject I'm available.

B H Levy hates Trump because he pulled American troops from Syria among other media spewed lies. Syria, Turkey and the Kurds have been fighting each other for over 1000 years, why should America spill their precious blood on foreign wars? He wants America to waste themselves for all of Europe's troubles. Our troops come home with no legs and arms, burned bodies, finally Trump is putting American troops first. Let Europe fight their own wars, enough of this, since when is America the world's army?

@Todd the Toddler Europe is against Trump removing troops from Iraq and other countries, Europe is against Trump's America first initiative. Trump hasn't entered any new war of any kind. The problem in the States is the media and loons like antifa and blm. And by the way everything I said was 100% right, just because you happen to disagree with me doesn't make what I said stupid.

@Todd the Toddler I know a whole lot, unlike you. And I don't care what you think

Mr Bannon is one of my heroes .... I never take that word lightly..he will never get the credit he deserves, much less have the terrible lies spewed about him dispelled.

Bannon is a charlatan and a grifter exploiting your ignorance. Don't like Levi, fine, look up geopolitics. Peter Zeihan, Ian Bremmer, Kevin Gallagher, Kevin Rudd....

They both say this, as does everyone. Whose version you agree with?

Peterson would destroy the other two frauds with his hands tied.

Ahh the Fascist Triumvirate

Won't see that ever at this point

I dont think that would be too interesting. They each would just do their own thing since they won't feel attacked. Peterson disagrees with the other two on geopolitics, but his focus on the individual would fail to connect to the other two

Wrong. Bannon doesn't know what he's talking about. Deride Levi's style all you like, but he isn't a charlatan or grifter attempting to mislead ignorant people for his own benefit - as Bannon is doing.

@@canteluna hahaha. Keep lying pal.

@@Lurch685 If you could show I am wrong you would. You can't so you don't.

@@canteluna look dude just because you don’t understand what Bannon is saying doesn’t mean I’m obligated to walk you through it.

@@Lurch685 What you really mean is that you know even less than Bannon.

They are both cheap demagogues. Bannon just happens to be in the right here. It's like Dugin making Lévy feel insightful and honest. Lévy here just doesn't want to pick up the tab of having his country's interests protected, and he has no idea how many of his "friends" are his enemies. And he doesn't understand that he can't babysit the whole fucking world, or get america to do it. He seems to forget that both FDR and Wilson were 5th columns, imperialism was always controlled demolition of the west.

You can have him as a statesman :-)

Except Bannon doesn't argue with facts. He is a dissembler, a liar and charlatan exploiting the ignorance of people like you.

China is a developing nation????

Remember communism?

@@pryazhnikov sounds like it was terrible

Interesting indeed

YOU “Bannon makes two very strong critiques of globalism: 1. that the privilege of the developed nations rests on the backs, of developing nations such as china. He makes the analogy to slavery (correctly I believe).” ME This comment, like virtually everything coming out of Bannon’s mouth is either a lie or a point of view not rooted in facts. This particular comment shows an ignorance that would disqualify Bannon from serving tea to REAL geopolitical experts. The global economy - which Bannon claims he despises, yet shows he doesn’t understand - is one that has been demonstrably good for everyone ON THE WHOLE if your objective is to have the highest possible standard of living in all nations of the world - relative to each other - and relative peace. Like all populists, Bannon doesn’t seem to understand the post WW2 Bretton Woods US-led global order that eventually allowed global trade (that IS what globalism means despite populists’ ignorant conspiratorial definition). He must know this and if so, he is just being a charlatan and grifter trying to exploit the ignorance of populists for his own gain. The global order has resulted in a division of labor that has been highly beneficial for the most part throughout the various world’s nations. To say otherwise, to say that developed countries are profiting off of them is like saying that a poor person with no trained skill is being exploited by some company employing him. The “developing” nations do not have the economic power to develop their economies in the first place OR THEY WOULD, and claiming or implying that they are not more wealthy due to exploitation or “enslavement” by the US or other powerful countries is almost certainly BULLSHIT (unless you’re talking about non democratic countries whose leaders are not accountable to voters). Mexico, for example, is a necessary economic partner for the US that allows them to do manufacturing that is no longer done in the US and thereby building their economy, as the US tends mostly toward higher, value added design of products (e.g. silicon valley). (BTW China is NOT a developing nation - but if they don’t turn their economy around soon they might become one again). This topic requires a much more in depth covering, but my generalizing will suffice to rebut your/Bannon’s position. YOU 2. “That we have an economic system which is structured to implode and to be bailed out by the average taxpayers, which basically forces average people to give their money away to the financial elite.” ME This is a completely naive or disingenuous analysis of the bailout and, having worked for Goldman Sachs, Bannon likely knows this and is preying upon the populist sentiments of those who don’t understand how the global economy works. There is plenty of criticism to levy against the way the bailout was handled but the system is NOT structured in a way to implode. The 08 crisis was due to the system FAILING to abide by its own structure (the ratings companies lied about the value of derivatives and allowed sub prime mortgages mostly). Their were whistle blowers who were ignored. And people were not held accountable who should have but to dismiss the crisis as a failure of structure is a lie and Bannon knows it. It’s like blaming the constitution and the structure of the US government with its checks and balances designed to enable democracy and the functioning of the liberal republic when a dishonest, illiberal administration takes power, as Trump did, with Bannon’s help. The structure, as good as it is, still requires honest actors. YOU “What he does not explain is how nationalism effectively addresses these issues. Would we not have the same issues but on a smaller scale with nationalist economies?” ME No. The problems would be much worse. Understand that the “nation state” is mostly a misnomer when used/defined by populists like Bannon. The nation states in Europe did not exist until recently, and even then they are mostly fortified within the EU (Norway has its own oil economy and can take advantage of other EU perks that allow its relative autonomy). Prior to WW1 Europe consisted of empires and so its economies depended on its colonies. Between WW1 and WW2 the empires were falling apart and after WW2 virtually all of the European empires were ended - the colonies suing for independence. But that was ok because the post war Bretton Woods agreement enabled virtually every country in the world to participate in the global economy with the US, through out navy, guaranteeing peaceful oceans for goods to be transported more cheaply than ever. Without this order - i.e. America first, Brexit, France First, etc - the economic alliances begin to weaken and be redefined as irnporant populists, whose high standard of living has completely depended on the old order, begin to ASSert national “independence” whining that the globalists are denying them true democracy and forcing immigration on them (again, not understanding how crucial immigration is and has been to their standard of living). YOU “With all its faults, (and I think that Global Bank and the IMF have on many occasions undone democracy, increased corruption, unsighted environmental havoc, and invited in cruel forms of power)” ME This is too serious an allegation not to supply examples. And part of the problem with this line of thinking or believing is that it is not falsifiable in the sense that we can never know what would have happened if what happened did not happen. I am not claiming there is no corruption or missteps in these institutions but the better question is were/are they more useful and beneficial than not? And if your answer is not, then the burden is on you to make a case for why. Noam Chomsky, Chris Hedges, left wing anti globalists have tried to make the case. Personally I am not persuaded. I have read too much from the pro-globalist side to find their arguments persuasive unless you want to claim that it would be better if nations returned to the old order, in which case you really are in a might-makes-right world (as Russia is attempting to reassert in regard to Ukraine understanding that the old order is not as united as it used to be and that, demographically, they are in a now or never moment to reassert a kind of war we haven’t seen in Europe since WW2 - pre order). YOU ”I do think that globalisms major triumph is that it has made world war bad business. When our economies depend on each other we are less likely to toss bombs around and invade others turf. Though, I doubt the solution to these problems will come from globalism or nationalism.” ME No. The first part of your comment is correct. Economic unions are bad for business and to forge a global dependence - as was the case with the post war Bretton Woods agreement - the world was lacking in war as it ever had been - especially in Europe. Russia - and unfortunately Ukraine - are about to find out the hard way that resorting to war will not only harm the global system, but will make their own economies much weaker. YOU “I see, alternatively, a growing experience of 'easfullness' accumulating in the world on the margins. A returning to the simplicity of being a human on a planet with neighbors.” ME People can’t afford to be this naïve. Certainly Ukrainians are not. Moldova, Poland, the people of the Baltic countries are not living under this pipedream (not to mention those in Georgia and Chechnia and Afghanistan). YOU “New economies are born out of new paradigms.” ME What do you mean? Even India, which does have an evolving value-added high tech sector, cannot build its economy based on that alone. It is going to take a process of building it up, by offering cheap labor (what Bannon dangerously calls ‘slave labor” I guess he prefers people starving to death) and developing all sectors of their economy. Remember, all an economy is is supply and demand. Sounds simple. It’s not. YOU “Neither of these men have anything decent or worthwhile they are offering.” ME Bannon certainly does not, he is a charlatan and a grifter, attempting to exploit the ignorance of those who know less than he does about how the global economy actually works. All he cares about is being the beneficiary of someone in power to enrich himself. He is despicable. Like Levi or not, nothing I heard him say was a lie. He is simply a messenger for a point of view that is losing favor - unfortunately. Because when economies falter people are too quick to blame the wrong thing or people. What we had worked and it worked for as many as it could. It was far from perfect but perfect is NOT an option. Just like democratic republics. Highly unlikely and not perfect but get rid of it and … you’re fucked. Back to tribes, empires, might-makes-right.

what about 2016? double standard.

2000 Mules

Sorry, we can't hear you over the steele dossier and the "fortifying" of the election.

@@andres_campos D'Souza is even more of a fraud than these two!

Then, like Bannon, you have no idea what you're talking about.

Bernard-Henri Lévy....GRANBUFFFFFFFON

Bannon knows nothing about geopolitics. His expertise is in exploiting the ignorance of populist morons who know even less than he does.

@@canteluna shill

@@relaxingsounds1386 Debate me, asshole, or crawl back into your mama's basement.

Yeah... its almost like a set-up!!!!

Anyone serious does not taken Bannon to be a serious intellect. I could wipe the floor with him. Bannon chooses to debate weak opponents. Love to see him go against Peter Zeihan.

Deride Levi all you like, but he isn't a charlatan or grifter attempting to mislead ignorant people for his own benefit - as Bannon is doing.

@@canteluna I am not sure you do know Bernard Henri Levy. I would bet that if you do a thorough search and you see his involvement in Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, Syria, lybia, Maidan-Ukraine, you would find Bannon to be a cuddly bear. What is evil in BHL is his humanitarianism, which can be summarised as: I kill out of love.

@@K24- I am not defending Levy's entire world view or that of the "globalists", only that globalism, with all its faults, is far preferable than the insanity that Bannon is arguing for. Read any respectable expert on geopolitics and you will hear Bannon's views resoundingly trashed as ignorant and dangerous. If Bannon actually believes his own blather, it is because he isn't informed. I doubt that is the case, very likely he is taking advantage of confused populists and telling them what they want to hear so that he gets recognition/fame and $$$. Bannon would not dare debate someone like Peter Zeihan or Kevin Rudd.

@@canteluna I don’t know much about Bannon apart from bits and pieces from here and there. Thus I can’t comment on his views. As for globalism versus “sovereignism”, I tend to loath ideology out of principle, because more often than not, political ideologies benefit to sociopaths. For knowing BHL sufficiently I put him in this category.

@@K24- Yes. The problem with ideologies is that they tend to be rigid and people end up defending them and those who support them rather than looking at them objectively. I wouldn't go as far as to claim sociopaths have ideologies because sociopaths usually believe in nothing but whether Hitler, for example, was a true believer in his own ideology or not, he certainly was a sociopath, at least in the sense that, like Putin, killing masses of human beings doesn't bother him because human beings are viewed as a mere means to his end.

He's a sophist and poetic apologist for war & murder

Are you referring to the rigged election of 2020? Gotta love mail in voting

Game isn’t over yet 😁

@@danielasmus447 It’s over. Social liberalism is inevitable.

@@ALeaud lol it’s sure been going well for you lately! I mean look at Europe, Florida, and the Supreme Court. Just wait till you see the election results in November, this is gonna be fun! Oh, and say hi to Chesa when you see him next, lol!

@@danielasmus447 It won't matter. We've managed to push virtually all right-leaning parties into the center. The GOP is full of gays now. And next it'll be full of trans people as well. What are you going to do? Make being trans illegal? Go for it lol. In a few years you'll be saying "Well, being trans is okay but being trans when under 12 isn't!" and then 5 years later you'll change that position too. You can't stop us, kid. I know you think you can, but you can't. The future is ours, not yours. We are forcing the entire political discourse to the left. Just look at the things DeSantis is now saying - he's already caving into the centrist wing of his party. The future belongs to us, not you. You will lose. Your electoral victories are meaningless. If you want to enforce your agenda you'll need to do it with Jan 6 style events which will 99.99% of the time end in you getting arrested.

Bannon said it best “America is not Europe’s protectorate.” At least not under Trump or any another America 1st administration in the future. “America 1st doesn’t mean isolationist,” at the same time, it also doesn’t mean Europe is entitled to a free ride on American coat tails or a free lunch on the American tax payers dime while US citizens risk life and limb, giving their blood, sweat and tears to become indentured servants--slaves to the agenda of the globalist oligarchs and their wet dreams of a NWO.

?

Really tragic comment. All question begging and you make a non-sequitur logic in attempting to dismiss a point of view by claiming it to be representative of MSM. Don't you Greeks study Aristotle anymore?

At least he doesn't lie, like Bannon.

Idk about putin anymore. We may be getting swervrd brother. Hard to gather. I dont have a political bias i dont want biden in the whitehouse or trump. Both sides against the middle as it feels they seem incompitent in different ways and appeal in others to some. Is that by design, idk anymore. God bless you brother

Its amazing Putin felt he had free reign when America was busy overthrowing a democratically elected Ukraine in 2014

Yep

But he invaded Ukraine when? Under Biden. Not Trump.

Dream on baby!

Europe for Europeans? Really? How old are you? Under 40? You must be referring to the recent EU the EU which only exists due to the US led post WW2 order. BTW How do you like Russia "uniting" Ukraine?

@@canteluna Russia isnt uniting Ukraine, Russia is denazifying Ukraine. The EU was designed in 1941 by Wehrmacht high rank officers. US-post-war-order is just the continuation of WW2. The USA is cancer of humanity.

@@canteluna Z

USA should be vaporized.

What an insane take

@@thelobster7277 Bannon is not Houdini though. And this way he would NEVER take Vienna.

Perhaps but globalism is responsible for the standard of living for everyone in the world, especially in the West. Dismantle the post WW2 Bretton Woods order - which we are thanks to ignorant populists - and you will see a lower standard of living which people like Bannon and Trump will manage to exploit.

Marxism is over. Some humanitarian instincts of Socialism are reusable but they're the ones the Oligarchs will not allow. Change your gender if you like but don't join a union.

@@KCavan i am not into id pol as i think no marxist should be. marx critique of capitalism is still very powerful to go beyond capitalism

Important concepts for you : what makes a person? what is consciousness? what is suffering? what is a gradiant? ... good luck, you will need it.

Because if you aren't kneeling on their necks they'd progress and get ahead

During the debate he interrupted Dugin just after three words, disgusting.

Wrong

He gave up booze in his forties. You should tarry with his arguments.

He looks homeless but he makes good points. What's interesting to me is that he makes the same critiques of the current system as any socialist/communist/leftie would do

@@OrwellsHousecat it's because the progressive left and the nationalist populist share the same worldview in terms of identifying the problems. Where they differ is in the solutions they propose.

@@holden6104 I agree! I wish others would recognise that too.

@@holden6104 exactly. I think there are a few minor improvements we could agree on, but we'll never come together

I am British and have to disagree ,on June 6th 1944 it ‘ s impact made the difference between winning or loosing

@@lorrainegoley9112 USSR saved Europe.. whether we like it or not

I agree the USSR played a major part in saving Europe during the 2nd world war , but that does not underrate the US impact in Normandy ,by which I mean June 6 th and the following months

You decide who to listen to based on body language. I decide who to listen to based on facts and world view. You are left with a charlatan and grifter. I can make educated decisions.

@@canteluna ha, ha, ha!! Educated decisions!! Were you moving your hands in the air and shaking your head dramatically???I am well educated and English is my 3rd language!! Did you think I care about your choices?? Lol

@@go5124 Nice to meet an educated person here (judging from 99% of the comments, Steve Bannon's audience are IGNORANT). Why don't we debate the issues and you can show off your educated views.

@@canteluna me debating the issues with you it’s like talking to a hypocrite!!! And I am not crazy like that!! I am with Steve Bannon all the way!! You are with Levy, be my guest!! Shake your head and shake your hands, you can even stomp your feet!! In the meantime pretend you are so educated that can debate issues with everyone!!!

@@go5124 Excuses, excuses. You can't point out ANY comment I've made that is hypocritical. I don't say things I can't back up, unlike you. I am not with Levy, I am with facts and evidence. That means I am anti-Bannon.

You didn't understand he is mentioning 6 different things not 3?

@@WiseOwl_1408 Well I listened four times as I assumed that... But he clearly says "in" every time.

I think it is fascinating, in June on 2022, to watch this ... for so many reasons. First, I think those who demonize Bannon look past the fact that a lot of what he says rings true: The bankers and lawyers at Davos all knew about the slave labor and detentions in Xianjiang, The Tibetan genocide, the tightening of the noose in Hong Kong. But they stood up and cheered anyway. And the same bankers and brokers and lawyers facilitated an international economic system, half slave and half free, which tends to hollow out the western democracies, economically. But Bannon doesn't give a shit about Xianjang or Tibet or, for that matter , about Flint Michigan either. Putin has proved Levi right about Russia and Bannon's preposterous notion that somehow Russia could be brought back into the fold of Western Civilization in order to take on the Yellow menace ...just too revealing, in retrospect. I can only imagine the depth of Levi's sorrow when Bannon was cuffed and perp walked off his Chinese billionaire friend's yacht!

You are giving credit to Bannon where none is due. He is a complete charlatan and grifter. He exists to exploit the ignorance of those who know less than he does about geopolitics. Seek out Peter Zeihan, Ian Bremmer, Kevin Gallagher, Kevin Rudd...

I’ll say it for him. They’re a distant 10th.

Yeah because Russia attacking a country that we are not even allied with means they are enemy #1 right? Idiot.

It is Biden’s fault that Russia is our biggest enemy … Trump tried to create peace with Russia …

To who is the question you should ask.

Not forgetting the epithet of "genius" given by Trump to qualify Putin. Republicans like Bannon (and Cruz, and Graham and ... - endless list) dishonour their country.

You’llet over it

Россияне скоро узнают, что глобализм не был врагом. Россияне скоро столкнутся с проблемой экономической изоляции.

@@canteluna через сколько примерно?

@@canteluna Вы понимаете, что ваше первое предложение противоречит второму? 🤣Это ведь как раз глобалисты НЕЗАКОННО пытаются устроить России экономическую изоляцию, грозятся "наказать" ее, НЕЗАКОННО действуя с позиции "мирового полицейского" (которым их никто не назначал) - это и есть действия ВРАГА. Только беспозвоночные могут принимать "наказания" из рук совершенно посторонней страны, у которой на наказания нет ни малейшего ПРАВА, и думать, что так и надо... Это как если бы к вам пришел сосед, велел вам снять штаны, сказал, что будет вас пороть, потому что ему не нравится как вы себя ведете, и вы бы сняли штаны и подставили зад, думая, что он "не враг" и желает вам добра...

@@klarachiamarsi5935 Неправильно, глупо. Россия нарушает не только международное право и геноцид, но и, что более важно, простую порядочность. Любой, кто пытается рационализировать геноцид, - кусок дерьма, не стоящий моего времени. Иди лизни Путину жопу.

@@klarachiamarsi5935 Россия дала миру первое коммунистическое государство и терроризировала весь мир, заставив Восточную Европу поддаться своей гнусной и продажной идеологии. Теперь Путин, как и Сталин до него, пытается совершить массовое убийство (войну), чтобы возвысить место России в мире, что она может сделать только с помощью войны, а не с помощью изобретательности, культуры и государственного управления. Путин - карлик с комплексом Кинг-Конга.

He's something else as well

Next debate in French : go Stevie go!