Isn't the definition circular? The sentence "Progress of a computation" in itself contains the element of time, because the word "progress" is defined as something that happens from the past into the future. So he defines time using another concept of time.

I finally understand something about 2nd thermo because of Wolfram work and his team.

In my mind, time is a coordinate. What Wolfram is describing would be the passage of time. Which is something different.

Is there some way to tie in Gödel, Turing, Chaitin, and chaos with these ideas?

One question for Mr Keating; 'What happens to entropy at 0 deg K'?

To recognize the second law, first they had to recognize time.

I remember bring my Wolfram book into my philosophy grad work in the 90s. They wanted nothing to do with it. If you spend a few minutes with his mind, agree or disagree, i cant imagine not thinking “this guy is onto something.” Its almost existential.

So does that mean computation is a dimension surrounding all things? What about the past and future?

It was a good interview.. Obviously clipped, of course, but here's the thing.. In THIS clip, as with most talks I have heard from the gentleman, Wolframs' ideas seem to be about fifty percent insightful and POSSIBLY correct .. The rest (unfortunately) seem to emerge from somewhere outside the purview of science.. One current opinion only..Peace.

Dr Keating, the link in the description does not point to the complete interview with Dr. Wolfram.

Don't think in terms of a 'big bang' think in terms of a embryo transitioning from a singularity to a fully formed being. Inwards, not outwards... This puts the 'big bang' at the end of the time line. Except that it is so infinitesimally small as to be indistinguishable from another point and as it is the end result of the process, it occurs at every point within the original embryo... And they exist at all moments in time, all the time. And they act as one, point which is free from the restrictions of transition that os present at other, more 'middle ground' reference frames. There energy and actions remain within thier own reference frame ad the adjacent frames are not sensitive to the transitional sequence and transitional movements velocity. Ie-the interfacing synchronisation of the two frames is extremely difficult to force into engaging and requires large amounts of energy to force them to remain engaged. There is one other frame which is readily able to engage with it, the original embryo. This engagement is easier than it is for the tiny point to secure enough energy to split any further. The original reference frame is ideally suitable for integration with the point in nearly every transitional moment of its sequence.... *'the very beginning determining the how the end will take form and the end sustaining the beginning with theb perfect form contained within its innumerable other forms that vary from wildly incompatible to nearly perfectly incompatible. (this is where nature receives the intuition for setting up every possible combination of order and allowing nature to run its course and find its own way, with the perfect coherence presenting itself at the end and beginning of 'time') This perfect form is not a perfect balance or divisible denomination. It is the perfectly balanced imbalance. If this one form did not exist, the machine wouldn't make it to the end, and therefore it wouldn't start.... And the process is starting at every instant in time, all the time. *But the abstraction of time does not apply to all references frames within the system in the conventional sense that entropy eludes to. Our reality is like a slither within a vast spectrum... The prefect imbalance also means the configuration is not identical at each 'return to the beginning.' Its incrementally different, in a determined way but one that makes weather predictions seem like counting to 2.

This is a somewhat childish question for Mr Wolfram. Do you think it possible to reverse the computational 'history' and reverse time? OR, could we select a certain point in computational history and go back to that point in time?

When is the Wolfram/Howard podcast?

Before there were atoms there was no heat?

🎯 Key points for quick navigation: 00:00 *⏳ History and Misconceptions of the Second Law of Thermodynamics* - Exploring the historical context and misconceptions surrounding the second law of thermodynamics, - Einstein's early attempts to prove the second law in the early 1900s highlighted philosophical approaches and challenges in understanding entropy. 02:19 *🧠 Philosophical Insights into Scientific Thinking* - Discussing philosophical influences on scientific thought, - Boltzmann's impact on Einstein's approach to scientific reasoning and the evolution of thought experiments in physics. 04:39 *⏲️ Computational Irreducibility and the Nature of Time* - Defining time as a process of computational irreducibility, - Time emerges as the sequential application of rules, where predictions cannot bypass the step-by-step computation process. 06:44 *🔍 Theoretical Insights on Temperature and Heat* - Clarifying the distinctions between temperature and heat, - Temperature is defined by the average kinetic energy of molecules, contrasting with the broader implications of the second law of thermodynamics. Made with HARPA AI

There is no time. Time is not a measurable dimension. When you think you are measuring time you are comparing the present with a memory.

The arrow of time is associated with entropy. What is associated with time as a quantity? What makes a second a second?

Thank you for taking the time to interview all of these great minds about such fundamental questions, while keeping people up to date in the latest advancements in physics! Please do not stop doing so, your content is extremely valuable! You should interview more mathematicians on the podcast too. Thanks!

As much as I agree with Wolfram that time and entropy are progression of “irreducible rules based computational steps”, I wish you both had covered the mechanics of those rules and its corresponding unit step. It is possible it is part of his detailed theory - and so, I welcome those details, in case Wolfram sees this comment This is where we as a firm have gone a step further - and I would be glad to collaborate with him as well In any case, under our TOE, it is a fine structure constant (FSC) and it’s flip sided golden ratio governed 2/3:1/3 rule driven least action formula of our CPT(α,Φ) function as explained in my articles link below and exhibits In other words, our TOE is a CPT(α,Φ) function operated cosmic  dance, where α ends up splitting the frequencies of QVF as 137 dipoles using Riemann Zeta function( including its corresponding Fourier/Mobius transformations), in such a way that the electric field of each dipole gets rotated as nπ cycles (using Euler’s identity eiπ ) before getting rotated by their magnetic field (by 90 degrees) so that their combined least action (A) can be twisted to flow along the eigen-valued nodes of Ramanujan graph, using the 2/3:1/3 rule of α (ratioed by its flip sided golden ratio Φ)! Stated otherwise, this idea of embedding CPT function within our TOE with 10+ META DUALITIES of the Langsland/Banach-Tarski paradox of our SOE/TOE engine is what differentiates our approach! For example, We imagine our Universe as the Riemann Zeta function governed LMFDB universe (that is a motivic/metamorphic/Galois representation based SU 2/SU3/SU4 symmetrical engine. In other words, Z(1) is the fundamental frequency of this Universe’s TOE engine that is QVF/ZPE sourced, FSC(α)-Einstein-Bohr-HV-Maxwell Daemon governed frequency of Riemann's zeta function Ζ(S) with a singularity of S=1+0i, that is made up of his harmonic oscillating zeros(S=1/2+it stacked on his 1/2 critical line, before being transformed as a 137 frequency-spin momentum matched dipole, using our FSC(α)-GR-PLA+5 AITGE origin formulas(see exhibit) In other words, our TOE/SOE engine is the one that is transforming the Riemann's zeros into an artistic unit charge SU2 dipole(see visual), by contracting/expanding its electric flux as the center of mass (as r = αR), before rotating its magnetic flux by 90 in such a way that it can be extended into the left plane as a paired unit charge, using the "only possible analytical continuation of Zeta". Sure enough, this engine function is nothing but universe's wave function only, transforming itself from position/time space into frequency/momentum space, using the Fourier transform operator -- ψ(k) = ∫ ψ(t) e^-iwt dt - This brings us to our next point about CPT function This "one & only allowed analytically continued/functional equation allowed symmetrical dipole" is what limits/constrains the ∞ pole of Riemann sphere to a value of 137 cycles( per Laurent/Cauchy residue including the α=r/R,=fe/fp=we/wp logic of our CP function as explained in my post and attached one page exhibit for details lim t→ ∞ CP(1/2 + ti) = 1/α cycles of dipole In other words, this CPT function proof(lnkd.in/drGQ44Mt) for Riemann hypothesis is a polynomial in the convex region of the Riemann Sphere only (thanks to the "one and only allowed analytical continuation logic of dipole & its 137 cycle ratio logic"), limiting/constraining the ∞ pole of Riemann sphere to the convex region - Turns out, this is what also makes our TOE as the best candidate (compared to all other TOEs), as we visibly see the signatures of FSC and golden ratio throughout nature Simply put - Ours is the only TOE that is anchored on this FSC/golden ratio governed CPT(α,Φ) function mechanism! In other words, for any TOE path to become a final TOE, it must be anchored on this FSC/golden ratio governed CPT(α,Φ) function mechanism end to end (in one form or the other)! This doesn't mean that ours is the only path - and the classic example is how we have integrated Ads/CFT duality of string theory with these 10 dualities of our CPT(α,Φ) function mechanism with the hypothesis that they toggle between CFT-boundary of the lower CP1 plane to & AdS-Bulk upper CP2 plane! This is where we want to extend it to all the other best in class features from all other TOE paths using this integrated program - which brings me to the list of our “top 10 CPT(α,Φ) function caused, META DUALITY PROOFS”, including our recent additions of Ramanujan graphs & Jones/Khovanov homology knots, as summarized below 1. Riemann zeros of dipole/quadrupoles(1/2+ti) 2. Hodge hyperbolic structures(H3 quotioned by K&A L-functions 3. Hodge P-adic parabolic structures (P(N) quotioned by K&A L-functions ) 4. Thurston structures(T(N) quotioned by K&A L-functions ) 5. Polytopes(PT(N) quotioned by K&A L-functions 6. Spectral vertices of Ramanujan graphs G2xK2 Q by Ramanujan L-function 7. K knots of Jones polynomial (&Feynman’s paths/Riemann surfaces) 8. HK knot states of Khovanov homology 9. Prime square roots of Knots theory 10. Irreducible representation of Poincare particles Similarly, if I may summarize the manifestations of these 10 CPT(α,Φ) caused dualities by mapping the lower CP1 plane to CFT-boundary & upper CP2 plane to AdS-Bulk 1. Imagine, as the CPT(α,Φ ) function starts limiting the “Riemannian ∞ quantum spherical universe” into a compact polynomial region of the lower plane (whose WF is modeled using a metamorphic/automorphic Riemann zeta function with a SU2-3-4 symmetry) -- it is automatically cut into infinite slices of irreducible diploid circular spheres at an exact moment when the Zeta function starts crossing the origin. of CP1 2. Also imagine, as these infinite slices get squeezed (1 & 4 at a time) into an exact radiused symplectic geometric asymmetric taurusized cylinder of the CP2 plane (folded from the unit square of CP1 plane)", acting as the Hilbert’s countable infinity hotel. 3. Now, as they get squeezed into an “exact radiused symplectic geometric asymmetric taurusized cylinder”, the electric field starts getting rotated 90°(by the magnetic flux), thus transforming it into an “domino effected ellipsoid”. 4. Now as we analyze the cross section of each “domino affected ellipsoid", we can clearly see these 10 geometrical dualities. 5. Turns out, our CPT(α,Φ) function is the one that rotates these 10 geometrical dualities “galoistically and knotistically” before reassembling them in CP2 as a classical sphere. In other words, CPT(α,Φ) does it all in real time by auto-collapsing/landing/toggling the particle as soon as zeta function starts crossing the origin in CP1 plane, so that it can shift it into the next lattice of CP2. This simultaneous shift is what gives us the feeling that these dualities are orbiting smoothly like the frames of Muybridge’s Horse in Motion. Simply put, Our top 10 CPT(α,Φ) caused dualities, along with our earlier framing of FSC as an AoC/HV/Maxwell daemon(lnkd.in/gtU2Rdix is what makes CPT(α,Φ) function as the META PROOF of Riemann hypothesis with a symbiotic symmetrical fractal causality to10+C-old unsolved problems incl. 5+ $5MM CI problems&10 biz ideas(lnkd.in/gyeftuYk). Similarly, how about I expand its scope to the productivity challenge in the business dimension that has been developed by the very same TOE principles(& synthesized as 1 sentence below and in exhibit) -- Every Maslow’s holacracial(1) economic need is a direct/indirect manifestation of QE caused Scripture/Griffith’s human condition/depravity model problem(2) only -- that is solved using the Principle of least action & its new insight(3) driven Fine-structure-constant(FSC) caused Attention factor (4) driven FSC/GT/Nash Equilibrium(5) based reality accurate S-economics model(6) caused Friedman’s Attention-Pluck(7) -- that is followed by an Solow’s TFP-expansion( 8 ), before it being executed by “sovereign-to-choose with collaboration without coercion(9)” motto, driven Next-Gen capitalism called Sovereign/Conscious Sustainalism(10). as explainer in this summary (www.linkedin.com/pulse/summary-our-firms-10yrs-toe-work-wa-request-world-form-prabakar-k25sc/?trackingId=3oeFnfoaRT61kGCCQ7VNNQ%3D%3D) Welcome complementary POVs

"According to Ramsey theory, pure randomness (in the sense of there being no discernible pattern) is impossible, especially for large structures. Mathematician Theodore Motzkin suggested that "while disorder is more probable in general, complete disorder is impossible"." Wikipedia

10:00 Why wouldn't you apply the 45-degree-rotated Nolan Chart to "ground news"?

I always wondered exactly what this law is trying to explain anyway. If I am not mistaken Sir Roger Pensrose always claims the entropy is the cosmos is always decreasing, not increasing. And what about the formation of ice christals: is that more or less freedom of location of water molecules. It is a senseless topic really. Distraction at best. Besides if the same construct like our big bang cosmos is gaining in spatial grid at the same time as it is loosing in its QP energy grid, then always the entropy will remain 1. They are each others inverse and cannot be seperately defined. Or have we forgotten Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. Dxdp

Time together with distance and the amount of gravity determine the rate of causation.

Telling your viewers you’re disappointed in them is a really bad idea. I subscribe when I want to see more from the presenter not see a particular guest. When I want to watch Stephen wolfram do a video, I type in his name into the search. Or subscribe to him. Help me help you, Doc.. just be interesting in your own right and that’ll be enough.

Oh a Relief. Stephen Wolfram had to write a Book just to understand the second law. so we good on that page. Thanks Doc.

I checked out of this when he said that Time was "us" applying more and more computations. So, since the Big Bang, "we" 've been computing? Sorry.

Sorry Dr Wolfram but any computation step take time so time is prior to computation not a consequence of it.

isnt it actually the same- time and the flow-of flow of irreducible computational "dimension"(its not a "thing" for sure- so "dimension" is nice/suffice..). Dr wolfram is the pure wisdom. he enjoys his insights - like a child watching fireworks.. those rare genius carrie

Dammit, I figured THAT out when I was a commercial HVAC technician. Heat’s the problem, but, it’s a sign of life, too.

Temperature is energy density

Im just glad to see logical mindsets follow the logical progression of the spatial Dimensions... leads to alot of advances for society... im just glad to see people working on exactly what i talk about... infinite 3d Multiverse is the result of existence of a 4th spacial dimension and given the compression of the universe in a flat or disc shape we can logically deduce that a 4th spacial dimension exists otherwise universe should be expanding in all directions evenly.

If the concept is wrong,how come scientist have been using it for so long?

Function of light backwards to second thermodynamics law and disregarded as temperature of time and a measurement….. Lee Drewniak Bjornson (Stan)

Listo Brian . Ya estoy suscripto . Saludos desde URUGUAY.

Can I buy a bridge in time?

Matter and energy are outcomes , time is the process.

Classical physics says atomic, divisible stuff like protons and neutrons are fundamental and subatomic, indivisible stuff like quarks are not fundamental. Wtf kinda logic is that haha

Still recycling old content. I'll repeat, You'll get 1 million subscribers when you stop caring about it.

Summary: Not even God can solve NP-hard problems instantly

I am subscribed and love yur vids.

He didn’t prove jack.

I’ll only sub when you accept aliens exist

good stuff .. i am subscribed by the way

Hi DrKeating. The link in the description seems wrong as it points to Sara walker. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Zq-bn8mr0tfeaGw.html

All world in subject closing looked in general scientist globally peace

These people are nothing but dramatists.

I PROVED IT FIRST! SORT OF KINDA ALMOST!

I quite like Stephen, and Stephen most clearly likes Stephen too.

“Folks, I’m kind of disappointed in you”. Who is this guy, Donald Trump?

To kinda proven? Lol

Wolfram looks like Larry David went off the rails with bangers and mash.

too much "so to speak" to be true

Time to say Einstein, (cosmological-quantum point energy × cosmological natural time) is a Planck constant eqivalency in GR, so: 1 k = ((E_CQ)/(26 Kelvins))

The exceptions are Neil deGras Tyson and Bill Nye.

CAUSALITY. All I hear are long winded versions of causality that they force fit into math. Modern science is not concerned with causality. It is more focused on describing RESULTS of some cause accurately using math, and then deriving their version of cause from the math description THAT MAY ONLY BE ANALOGOUS. This creates a very deep hole as a paradigm that you will never escape. If the kinetic theory of temperature is only analogous and temperature is not caused by motion at all, a lot must change. The partial pressures of gases is not kinetic. Like molecules seem to repel each other exclusively. Also, the Strong force was INVENTED to keep electric charge a constant. They never considered that electric charge may change apparent mass in a nucleus and charge become something different when it is crammed into a nucleus. This is the ONLY job for the Strong force, to prevent that. It is funny that neutrons are invisible.

Great at both at Mathematica and self adulation. Falling into charlatanism. Give him not the Nobel but the Igy. No Stephen you have proven nothing.

Time is consciousness….what is the problem

Negative time was an infinite nothingness until it separated and become relative positive time and us.

lame definition of time. also, what is this "irreducible" talk? joining the creationists? the world is not a computer simulation.

This is a very badly edited video that does nothing to allow a proper presentation of Wolfram’s work. I’m disappointed in you.

10 minutes of useless fluff.

Damn, Wolfram is so arrogant, and he is oblivious about it.