It may have a lot to do with the bar and chain than the design of the saws, themselves.

Agreed

Me to im not biased I enjoy any saw that runs good and chews wood.

@@joseamezola4345 husks are awesome I honestly use my 390 for most jobs and I can climb with it when necessary.

@@PoplarMechanic I've never ran a 390 but its gotta be great I know they're more boxy like the 372 not as long and thin like the 395 and they dont have the dumb front chain tensioner like the 395 every saw husky makes is good they just lose more bolts than stihl do

@@joseamezola4345 140 psi good compresion 372 xp oem mahle?

@@joseamezola4345 372xp rpm max 13500 ?

Bullshit

Agree with you on the oiler,but the husqvarna just has more grunt. It may make a seconds difference if the stihl also wore a 24" bar,but it's not significant since the log is only about 20" in diameter. I dont even own a husqvarna ( dont like workin on them) and I do own a 441c. It's been a great saw for 10+ years,but I've often felt it was a little underwhelming in big hardwood.

This is nonsense, and you sound personally hurt by the video lol. Bar lenth only really matters when you're in enough wood to bury it. A 32" bar and 20" bar on the same saw going through 15" hardwood would be negligible if at all on engine load/speed. Using the same chain, you would have the same amount of cutters pulling through the wood at any one time regardless of bar size. The no-load power required to simply spin a longer bar is extremely negligible. Grade school physics figures that out. But if it *really* bothers you, there are plenty of other videos proving that stock for stock the 372 is faster with the same bar and chain. And more reliable.. And less money... And simpler... And a better aftermarket... And more modifiable lol.

@@-LiveFreeorDie the dyno results are pretty conclusive about hp drop across bar lengths. Timed cuts are posted all over the internet. A comparison video that states a slanted result is just useless.

@@iraagans3144 Ironically in the one video I found of timed results across bars 20 to 36 inches on a ms461, the 28 inch bar was actually faster than the 24 inch bar lol

Didn't have others sorry 😘

Gracias amigo! Stihl y Husqvarna son hermosa motosierras.

@@joseamezola4345 oil mix 1:33 ?

Yes I got 462s and 572s now

Yes it does I stated that in the video

Stock

I sadly cant agree

Jose Amezola just look at the number of 372’s cases for sale, most of which are smoked. You will seldom even see a 440 or 441 for sale in any condition. 372’s like to beat the bearing pockets out of their cases, which makes them unusable. I own husky and Stihl saws but I think Stihl saws are much better engineered than Husky, especially in the pro models. Regardless, either saw if properly maintained and not beaten to death will last the user a lifetime.

@@johnclarke6647 I too am primarily a Stihl guy. Own a bunch of em. I agree with the build quality factor. You can tell how well they're made just holding each in your hands. With that being said, the 346, 372, and 395 are all excellent saws. The 372 is a good sized saw for most of what you'd need for the majority of bucking, felling, etc. They pull a 24" chain well, but I'd have to agree that all in all the 044/ 440 is more "robust" feeling in my hands. Definitely my go-to saw, although those 372's are nothing to sneeze at if treated properly and not abused or run over by someone lmao

Not true

@@johnclarke6647 Yeah 372 xtorqs are shit, the 372 OE is a bullet proof saw

Mais isso acontece nas roçadeiras também.

@@luizcarloslittig3361 cara a stihl fs 460 45cc husqvarna 345fr 45cc na ficha tecnica a stihl intrega mais kw que a husqvarna mais na pratica a 345fr no naylon circular ganha e entrega mais economia com seu motor x-torq 75% menos gazes poluentes e 20%mais economica,.as 2 marca sao boa mais eu prefiro a husqvarna por ter melhor rpm em carga e gastar menos,.