Truly enlightening. A major influence on my thinking.
@user-dm4cc8mv6b7 ай бұрын
Found this by accident. Really excellent. Both Heidegger and Holderlin are Zen thinkers, in my view. Many disagree.
@HPS-Wes4 жыл бұрын
Great lecture, thanks :)
@NikolaiRogich4 жыл бұрын
Bravo.
@bradfordmccormick95014 жыл бұрын
"I found this an eloquent lecture. But, respectfully, I think also of JAMA Network "It's over, Debbie" (JAMA. 1988;259(2):272. doi:10.1001/jama.259.2.272). How to comprehend both together?
@clumsydad7158 Жыл бұрын
Fantastic
@stevenyafet4 ай бұрын
50 years ago I was enraptured with Holderlin also. Powerful gerunds and participals. But even in my foolishness their over-use was showing. Shakespeare (De Vere actually if you want to understand him properly) never made the error. Direct sentences are best even with metaphors and subjunctives tacked on. Action through words. Not long ago listening to Hubert Dreyfuss I believed Heidegger had weltanshuang and phenomenology best for understanding why LLMs / AI worked. But now, not so much. Read CS Peirce first and foremost. Not on the first try but find the greater gleaming there. More general than the Romantic autumnal glow of Holderlin and Heidegger.
@minodoraruschita97152 жыл бұрын
Frumos. Și totuși filozoful Petre Țutea avea dreptate să spună că discuțiile sunt un atentat la ideea de meditație. Despre conferința lui Heidegger de la Freiburg din 1957, kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qNFzabWau8-1ipc.html
@havenbastion Жыл бұрын
This video is about a person taking about a person talking about a person talking about an instance of philosophical minutiae. And people wonder why philosophy goes nowhere.