Who the hell plays 30 minutes

​@@mattattaxx5425i do

​@@mattattaxx5425those who play the whole game in their head

15 + 10 is better

I believe he should choose one of the games and analyse it after. But o like this fast pace games.

bro this comment is exactly what I was thinking its a great way to learn and I've went up bc of this guy and the analysis at least 1 game would be nice

NO! Bxh4 = free checkmate for White! Killer move g4!! Ke4 only move for Black. Queen d5 is mate. When the “Free” piece looks obvious, Don’t take it! You should know in your heart strong chess players never give anything for free. Your falling into 1 of the most devastating tricks in all of chess. You might not understand or know how your falling into their trap, but rest assured they have one. Very rarely do strong players make outrageous blunders. That Knight has poison written all over it.

@@XPLAYERJX You say "Ke4 only move for Black", but black gets mated in 1 move that way with Qd5 (as happened in the video). Your "Killer move g4!!" is not mate in one (black still has Ke4), so taking the knight seems strictly better than your suggestion, right..? I agree Black will be mated regardless, but fight back as much as possible.

@@MatroidX You misunderstood what I wrote. Your statement was: “Bxh4 = free piece for Black?” My response to you was No. It’s a checkmate. I gave the checkmating moves. - Bxh4 - g4+ - Ke4 - Qd5# If you don’t take Knight, it is mate in 1. If you do take the Knight, it is mate in 2. No matter what move you play as Black. The Knight h4 move will not be considered a free piece. It’s a Knight Sacrifice designed to hunt down and checkmate the King. Usually, A Free piece is a piece which your opponent gives you by way of a blunder. Once, you capture the Free piece, your opponent has no compensation or justification for the loss of the piece. Their is justification for White to play Nh4+. The move is part of a grand plan to checkmate the enemy King which is unavoidable. This is why you can’t say Bxh4 is free piece for Black. ----------- In regard to your other statement: “I agree Black will be mated, but fight back as much as possible.” Is fighting to the bitter end with Black better vs. not fighting? It depends on your chess ranking. At low chess level, it is considered good to fight on. The reason why is because most low level players make several errors through out the game. If you fight on, you give yourself the best chance to make a come back. At high chess level, it is considered bad to fight on. The reason why is because most high level players believe their opponent is capable of converting a win. Fighting on could be considered Rude! A National Master facing a Grand Master. The Grand Master up 1 minor piece. Should the National Master fight on to the bitter end? He certainly has the right to do it, but should he do it? Some might say Yes. Some might say No Some might say fighting on when he knows he is lost is being rude/jerk. Do you think the Grand Master can’t convert a minor piece advantage against you? Do you think the Grand Master is going to Blunder away the win? Obviously, it is a highly talked about topic. People can argue all day over this. ----------- My stance on the issue is the following: I will fight on if I believe I have chance. I will not fight on if I believe I have no chance. When you become a strong player in chess, you can sort of know if you have chances or not. Sometimes, I might be down knight, but I managed to get 2 or 3 pawns in process. It can be losing position, but the position could have compensation. Their is clearly a difference between having nothing vs. having something. If I feel like, I have something. I might continue. If not, I will simply resign.

Awesome!

Same here

It’s not better. Nelson played the better move.

Black doesn’t have to take Knight on d5 with his Queen. Black can take Knight on d5 with his Knight. Than White loses a piece for a pawn. Well it might be 2 pawns, but still not worth it.

That square is still covered by 3 white pieces with another potential discovery after the white rook capture. All that being said I would’ve moved the rook to the other suggested square. Good thought. I’m likely missing a good black followup being a Patzer myself.

White's Rc6 instead would have captured the Queen for sure, right?

You are incorrect! If Black blocks with Rd5, White takes the Rook with his Rook on d5. Than White has the same discovery as before. Black can’t move his Queen out of Danger. Any square Black Queen goes to the White Rook will follow with same tactic. Black needs to play 2 moves in this position. Black needs to move his King & move his Queen both out of Danger. The problem is the rules of chess only allow 1 move to be played at a time. Unfortunately, in this position, the Black Queen is lost no matter what Black does. The only thing Black can do is get the most value he can out of the Queen Sacrifice. Nelson played the better Rook move. Rc6 isn’t as good as the move Nelson played. If Rc6, Black will play Qd5. It blocks the Check with Queen. It’s still losing for Black, but the goal for Black is to get as much material as he can in the process.

Good question. I honestly didn't even see the bishop at d8 at first. There is a chance that maybe even Nelson overlooked it. Anyway, you made me think and I found the soulution. It's a mating net! After Bxh4 there is g4+! and Black's only escape square is e4. After that it's just a mate: Qd5#

Queen takes the Knight on e3 with check. King moves to d1. Rook delivers checkmate on f1.

Nelson was illustrating how the Queen could get trapped and was making a mental note to think about it. The Queen can get trapped in this position after a few series of moves if White isn’t careful. Nelson was telling people the starting move and the finishing move in the sequence of moves. - Nf6 - Kf7 - Nc6 - Bg7 Nelson is a strong chess player and strong chess players often do the above as a short hand. Other strong players will know what they are saying, but I can see why you was confused. Nelson should have explained the whole thing out so beginners players could understand. It is a video dedicated to teaching beginners so they might not understand a short hand analysis.

Still very much winning for white after Rd5

There is mating net with Qe5+ force Ke7 it's discover check available Ng7+ follow with Rxe8#

Engine prefers what you suggested but only marginally. Both are winning moves.

Jeez it's no wonder no one likes you.

Jeez it's no wonder no one likes you.

Read the title

The best thing to do at 1000 is literally just stop simple blunders and play solid. People are making blatant blunders till like 1200

you getting the rating points back anyway. playing better people will also improve your chess more than beating 400s who blunder in the first 10 moves over and over.

I disagree on this. I love the way Nelson is playing. I am stuck on 900 and really like the way Nelson is explaining what is going on in his head concerning the position and why he is playing a certain move.

@@maartenduits5381 I like the way he is explaining stuff too, but it's not helpful when he gets a winning position after 5 moves. Like no 900 plays like that. A lot of 900 still blunder and they won't play the most critical move. All I am saying that I think it would be nice if he played a bad move once in a while and explained why it's a bad move and how in the long run this move messed up the game, so that lower rated players can see the mistakes that they make. Also it gives the other opponent a fighting change which makes it more interesting. May be even outline the mistakes that the opponents make and what you should do in this moment. And trust me, it's gets boring very quick watching a high rated player destroy a low rated player. A lot of chess KZfaqrs have these types of videos and they get boring.

The 700 rated players don’t understand what? The point is showing how to bring all these basic principles into play at this level and it’s extremely helpful to me. Teaching us how to avoid making blunders with a logical thought process. I’d much rather learn the right way to do things.

Yes but it still loses

@@vladimirbajkic8537 They'd definitely still be in a huge losing position, but that would be a bit better than losing the queen. I think that makes Rc6 better than Re5.

Yeah, that's what i said if he went Rc6+ he would win the queen