CGI vs VFX vs SFX - What’s the Difference and Why It Matters
Рет қаралды 595,611
Күн бұрынVisual Effects vs CGI - We look at the differences between three terms that are often confused.
What is a VFX, CGI, and SFX? ►► bit.ly/wi-ci
Full Interview with Ian Failes ►► bit.ly/in-if
Subscribe to StudioBinder Academy ►► bit.ly/sb-ad
StudioBinder Blog ►► bit.ly/sb-bl
─────────────────────
Chapters:
00:00 - Introduction to CGI, VFX, and Special FX
00:52 - Defining CGI, VFX and Special FX
02:38 - What Are Special Effects?
04:42 - What Are Visual Effects?
07:45 - What is CGI?
11:32 - Deep Dive: 1917
13:57 - Final Thoughts
─────────────────────
VFX VS CGI VS SFX
There is a debate raging in the film industry. Well, there are multiple debates raging in the film industry, but today we’re focusing on one of them: VFX vs CGI vs SFX. This debate is rooted in confusion over definitions, and CGI fatigue. Certain audiences, and filmmakers, are tired of CGI being used as a creative bandaid, sloppily solving problems in post which allows for laziness on set. In this video, we dive head first into this debate, and find that the answers aren’t as clear-cut as they might seem…
WHAT IS SFX?
First, we look at the oldest of the three categories: SFX, short for special effects. Special effects refer to any elements created on set, also referred to as practical effects. When a filmmaker brags about doing some crazy visual “for real,” this is what they’re referring to. Today, SFX have become coveted, and even fetishized. See any Tom Cruise interview.
WHAT IS VFX?
Now, the second oldest: VFX, or visual effects. These are any effects added to imagery that was captured during production. This can be compositing, green screens, virtual production, motion capture, paint outs, and much more. VFX today are mostly done digitally, but a visual effect can also be executed without a computer. Old compositing techniques with optical printers count as VFX.
Now, here’s where the confusion can occur.
WHAT IS CGI?
CGI, or computer generated imagery, is a type of visual effect. But not all visual effects are CGI. CGI only refers to elements that are created solely using a computer. Seems pretty straightforward, right? The confusion arises from when filmmakers boast that their film didn’t use any CGI. People will quickly look at film’s credits, see all these VFX artists’ names, and claim that the filmmaker is lying. But actually, these VFX artists might be working on other VFX that don’t include CGI.
PRACTICAL VS DIGITAL
So why are more and more filmmakers emphasizing they aren’t using CGI? The answer lies in the evolution of filmmaking over the past 30 years. CG has become more and more dominant. And while this allows for creatives to build worlds never before thought possible, it can also result in less-than-stellar visuals and lazy filmmaking. But this is only when CGI is used poorly- it’s not an indictment of the tool. In the end, CG will always have its place in film. It’s just what that place looks like that may change.
#FilmTheory #VideoEssay #Filmmaking
─────────────────────
♬ SONGS USED:
“Smalltown Boy” - Bronski Beat
“Meth Lab Zoso Sticker” - 7 Horse
“Werewolves of London” - Warren Zevon
“Nothing But Blue Pills” - Don Davis
“Gremlins” - Jerry Goldsmith
“James Bond Theme” - Monty Norman
“Jaws” - John Williams
“EEAAO” - Son Lux
“This Title Makes Me Jurassic” - Michael Giacchino
“Across The Board” - Basil Poledouris
“Main on End” - Alan Silvestri
“Kahndaq” - Lorne Balfe
“Bella” - Jason Fendrix
“Oppenheimer” - Ludwig Gorransson
“Terminator 2 Theme” - Brad Fiedel
“On The Case” - Henry Jackman
“2815 AD” - Michael Giacchino
“Hovercraft Muzak” - Fred Karlin
“Monkey to the City” - Michael Giacchino
“Amok In Redo” - Cowboys In Japan
“Blake and Schofield” - Thomas Newman
“Engländer” - Thomas Newman
“Milk” - Thomas Newman
“The Boche” - Thomas Newman
“Lisan al Gaib” - Hans Zimmer
“The Gonk” - Herbert Chappell
Music by Artlist ► utm.io/umJx
Music by MusicBed ► bit.ly/2Fnz9Zq
─────────────────────
SUBSCRIBE to StudioBinder’s KZfaq channel! ►► bit.ly/2hksYO0
Looking for a project management platform for your filmmaking? StudioBinder is an intuitive project management solution for video creatives; create shooting schedules, breakdowns, production calendars, shot lists, storyboards, call sheets and more.
Try StudioBinder for FREE today: studiobinder.com/pricing
- Join us on Social Media! -
Instagram ►► / studiobinder
Facebook ►► / studiobinderapp
Twitter ►► / studiobinder
#film-theory, #video-essay, #filmmaker
@PhantomFilmAustralia 25 күн бұрын
The most egregious sin when it comes to VFX and CGI is having cutting edge technicians using state-of-the-art technology, yet they are never given the necessary time required to achieve either an incredible effect or invisible effect.
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
We appreciate all the work these artists do and there so much work to be done these days! But you're right, when given sufficient time and resources, these tools can create real magic.
@erock.steady 23 күн бұрын
@@StudioBinder true, but i wonder if you (or i) overlooked the point being made... if team A is given 2/3 of what is needed, and the goal isn't achieved, then team A can't be villified as the reason the production fell short. great content. many thanks.
@SirsasthNigam. 4 күн бұрын
Mutant Mayhem TMNT made sure Animators weren't overworked
@LeviAmes 18 сағат бұрын
Animator here. I would add, that resources are always come and go on a project, great projects have been done under short time..its really the three I's.. indefinite incessant indecisiveness that happens with a director, supervisor or lead that lead to massive crunch time and withering of resources. Sometimes you get very very very insecure people who have no idea what they want leading the charge on these gigantic projects, and they just try a bunch of things never trusting the crew and it honestly is HUGE morale killer for people making it happen and it shows up as faulty and mediocre work on the screen unfortunately.
@Dr.W.Krueger Минут бұрын
Todays VFX artists are antisocial nerds, much more than we were back when my generation started getting into computer graphics in the early 80s. These people can't stand looking at other humans, let alone the things they strife to recreate. from an industry veteran
@aspizak 25 күн бұрын
Top Gun is a great example of everyone from studio to Tom lying about CGI. Sure. They shot a lot of ref footage, but 90% was replaced by CGI. Saying there’s no CGI in it while it was more CGI shots than Black Panther is rather disrespectful for artists work on it.
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
It's an unfortunate situation. The narrative around Top Gun was definitely misleading but it's still a fantastic movie and the process they used was still jaw-dropping, even if it was augmented.
@gregorylagrange 22 күн бұрын
The scene with the jet buzzing the guy on the ground with the dirt flying up, the plane didn't look real. Never seen the movie so I didn't know they were trying to tell the public that the didn't use any.
@halfvader8015 22 күн бұрын
@@StudioBinder Even you're being a little disingenuous/gentle on them. And that needs to stop, because it propagates the lie. More than augmented, and they, including Tom himself, flat out lied. That's the word you're looking for I think. At least we have Movie Rabbit Hole for the last word on it now. And yes it's a great movie. Even before the vfx reels came out though it was pretty simple. Did anyone in the audience think that the future blackbird scene was any less tense because it's obviously cg? Nope. Is a civilian allowed to fly any jet/fighter? Nope. It's illegal. Therefore... Pretty simple.
@mightygame9944 20 күн бұрын
They lied you on every corner and yall believed it for the sake of Tom cruse. Only him that flew some of the engines and in a very controlled environment
@StayFractalesque 8 күн бұрын
@@gregorylagrange ..because that plane doesnt exist, but there was a plane originally in that shot.. also, everyone is taking tom out of context.. he said "everything in the cockpits, is real.." ..he was speaking generally about how they really went up in the air.. watch the full clips if you can find them.. btw, i agree they shouldn't lie, i just dont think they did..
@gingerdog8203 25 күн бұрын
From what I’ve seen, in the industry rarely actually say “CGI”, or atleast not as generally as the public. Tbh, I’m just tired of hearing people using it to trash on the vfx industry (the industry that includes vfx, cgi and sfx)
@JohnnyFehr 25 күн бұрын
For us there is no difference in CGI and VFX. This video is a bit misleading sadly. There is only VFX and SFX. Also when you "only" composite two real plates together its with the help of a Digital tool that will create a final image that is computer generated as blending two images together needs digital effects applied what means you get a digital final frame created by a computer.
@rangerCG 25 күн бұрын
@@JohnnyFehrI agree for the most part, although if someone is trying to say that something was created by 3d graphics programs as opposed to being real they'll use the term "cg", not "vfx". I throw around the word compositing or composited a lot for 2d graphics/stock stuff added. Also something people might now know is that "fx" usually refers to physics simulations like smoke or particles, fire, liquids etc, so an fx artist would be someone who specializes in those things.
@JohnnyFehr 25 күн бұрын
@@rangerCG thats why its important to educate the terms correctly. For example in Nuke there is a lot done in 3D too even if its just cards projections. Compositing is the same VFX like Modeling or Animation. So if the "CGI" in a movie is good or bad, we should call it VFX and not CGI. What if modeling, lighting, animation did an amazing job but comp not. and the audience will say its bad CGI so you blame the wrong one then? its all part of VFX if its made digital. We in VFX itself don't even use the word CGI 😅we do VFX and VFX contains different departments just like SFX.
@kevinbillington9773 25 күн бұрын
The industry that really brings us the magic
@StudioBinder 25 күн бұрын
That's true. Our goal with this video was more for people outside the industry who do use terms like "CGI." We hope it came across that CGI is part of VFX, just like Practical Effects are part of Special Effects.
@daniellatteo_thefilmmaker 25 күн бұрын
4:22 How great it must be to be Nolan and candidly say: "Ok guys, we're going to have some SFX in this scene. A big truck flips end over end, and then lands upside down in the middle of the street" SFX Super " How are we going to do that?" Nolan "Well, we're going to get a big truck, flip it end over end, and land it in the middle of the street".
@glmstudiogh 25 күн бұрын
@@jasonbidwell you read my mind. exactly the reply I was about to type.
@StudioBinder 25 күн бұрын
When you've got a top-tier SFX Supervisor like Chris Corbould, he makes it happen! Check out this other video we did with him a while back: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/kM92jbl1q7ndd3k.htmlsi=RvbEiokTvlxxwPfm
@deadstar44 23 күн бұрын
@@jasonbidwell Funny because a Nolan fanboy was swearing up and down in the comments section under another video that Nolan never lies in interviews about only using practical effects and only uses little CGI even though Double Negative did replace some practical shots while Nolan still prances around that those shots are 100% practical. Nolan contributes to this anti-CGI fad.
@edba1.037 11 күн бұрын
@@jasonbidwellno, it was actually almost practical, the cgi is to erase the cable
@edba1.037 11 күн бұрын
@@deadstar44i don't think so, the movie rabbit hole have already gave explanation about that, even interviewing nolan's vfx supervisor, he's pretty much honest in his use of cgi
@akashdefonseka 25 күн бұрын
This is the kind of video that needs to be watched by everyone because SOOO many of us can't differentiate between these terms despite using them
@StudioBinder 25 күн бұрын
It's really confusing out there! Hopefully, this clears it up a bit.
@kimkhoitruong5991 24 күн бұрын
SFX: created and function while on set VFX: post filming and editing CGI: fully done by computer while still filming and post editing
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
That's a pretty concise explanation!
@halfvader8015 22 күн бұрын
When you use them as an acronym, SFX also means sound effects. Also, with computer. Not by computer. Also meaning 3d imagery specifically, not all digital work. The delineation and separation is the point here!
@kimkhoitruong5991 22 күн бұрын
@@halfvader8015 thank for the clearity english not my first language so its hard to convey everything
@halfvader8015 22 күн бұрын
@@kimkhoitruong5991 Ah I'm sorry mate I didn't consider ESL, my apologies!
@kimkhoitruong5991 22 күн бұрын
@@halfvader8015 yeah no problem i self taught myself english and visual effect over the years its easy to understand but hard to explain to other people haha
@freddyjosereginomontalvo4667 25 күн бұрын
As corridor crew once said: You must do everything on practical effects, puppets, and makeup... and then use CGI and VFX to improve them and to apply where the practical effects can't be applied. Awesome video as always say. Thanks for being one of the best channels about cinematography
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
Well said! We love those guys at Corridor.
@halfvader8015 22 күн бұрын
Well, CC and most every vfx supervisor ever!
@TrackpadProductions 22 күн бұрын
I really hope this video blows up the way it deserves to. One of my _biggest_ pet peeves in film circles is when people use these terms interchangeably, and I'm _so_ happy there's someone willing to break it down properly.
@synsam12345 25 күн бұрын
1:52 - It's a bit unfortunate that they touch on the fact that a lot of filmmakers claim they don't use CGI, using Top Gun and Tom Cruise as an example, when it has been proven that a lot of these filmmakers and especially Top Gun have lied about this. The clip they picked to illustrate this is literally a CGI jet. I know they also said "CGI is misunderstood" in that section, but it's not just misunderstood, those claims are just straight up lies. The jets seen in Top Gun are CGI, even though the filmmakers (like Tom Cruise) claim they aren't. For some reason both journalists and others writing about filmmaking often spread the false rumours, even though they obviously are false, since there often can be VFX breakdowns showing what's CGI. Note that some filmmakers use the power of NDAs to block VFX artists from talking about the production, even after it has been released. (That's not the case with Top Gun though, so there are plenty of proof debunking the lies used in marketing.) And note that tons of VFX artists are cut from the credits, so don't use that either as a way to measure the amount of VFX work (Nolan can literally cut hundreds of VFX artists from the credits). I can recommend the KZfaq series _"NO CGI" is really just INVISIBLE CGI_ for those wanting to see a good summary of a bunch of these examples. Cheerio.
@StudioBinder 25 күн бұрын
We included Top Gun Maverick for just that purpose - to show that this "No CGI" trend is misleading for audiences. We're also big fans of that series from The Movie Rabbit Hole. Highly recommended!
@synsam12345 25 күн бұрын
@@StudioBinder Ah, maybe I misinterpreted you then, but I think a lot of people will, because it's very unclear what's being the point there.
@dalelinney8437 24 күн бұрын
@@StudioBinderI don’t think that is clear at all. You said it was controversial, but there was nothing to imply that Cruise was wrong about those shots. I love this channel, and appreciate you approaching this topic, but think you’ve missed the mark this time.
@gregorylagrange 22 күн бұрын
@@dalelinney8437 If he said everything is real, and it wasn't, how can you say there's nothing to imply that he was wrong?
@halfvader8015 22 күн бұрын
@@dalelinney8437 Er. Yeah there is. It's documented. Him saying "It's all real" is pretty straightforward mate. He was wrong, and intentionally so. It's called lying. Where do you get "there's nothing to imply"?!! You get the irony on missing the mark right? And go watch the Movie Rabbit Hole series...
@GautamDas-lo6gs 25 күн бұрын
Please make a video on directing style of :- 1) Alfred Hitchcock 2) Sergio Leone 3) Francis Ford Coppola 4) David Cronenberg 5) Guillermo Del Toro 6) Ridley Scott 7) James Cameron 8) Tim Burton 9) John Woo 10) Kathryn Bigelow
@adityanimmalapudi2880 25 күн бұрын
Don't forget Christopher Nolan, because in his style of storytelling needed help on that, please.
@ZulquarPlays0207 25 күн бұрын
@@adityanimmalapudi2880 they have already made a video about nolan
@StudioBinder 25 күн бұрын
These are all great suggestions! I can say that we have a couple of these in the works but I'll let you guess which ones.
@StudioBinder 25 күн бұрын
We have a lot of videos on Nolan but we don't have the full Directing Styles yet. Someday!
@Schmidtelpunkt 24 күн бұрын
10! There are plenty of videos for all the others, but Bigelow is too rarely mentioned.
@solertia33 25 күн бұрын
The whole “No CGI” thing being used as a marketing tool is kinda silly. Nothing about filmmaking is “real” and filmmakers having been using “fakery” since the beginning. Just make a good movie and we won’t care.
@dalelinney8437 24 күн бұрын
It’s also lies most of the time! Napoleon, Maverick and many more… Directors, lead actors and execs just lying.
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
Amen!
@JacobJohnson-lh4gx 25 күн бұрын
I used to be a intern for a CGI studio and ngl everything shown and explain here is on point. Not to mention you gotta have the most expensive and top of the line computers and other equipment to be able to make the best output as possible. We literally went from goofy looking effects to realistic and seamless looking effects composited in various media. The obsession with making things look realistically look seamless is what makes the whole thing so meticulous and time consuming haha. I remember creating running animation for a 3D character meant to be shown for like 10 seconds which mind you took me weeks to finish, fine tuning everything, making sure everything looks right from the weight of each step, the interaction of the feet to the ground etc. Only for it to be covered up by the VFX department with dust, debris and smoke. The frustration was real, I wasn't even paid to animate it cause I was a intern back then haha.
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
VFX artists are definitely unsung heroes! Thanks for sharing your experience.
@oliviab4079 24 күн бұрын
CGI could honestly get a video all its own with so much involved in the process. You’ve got modeling, rigging, texturing, animation, lighting even simulated physics…that’s why it grinds me gears when people say “this CGI looks bad” because they really only have a gripe with one of those aspects but don’t know enough to specifically call it out. Instead they lump everything under just “CGI”
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
That's very true. We wanted to give a more concise explanation here but this could have easily been an hour long video.
@rayancedrichaddad1197 25 күн бұрын
It's a complete audiovisual encyclopedia about the Differences between those Three Aesthetic Elements/Illusions in Filmmaking. CGI/VFX/SFX are the Three Musketeers Illusions in Filmmaking. Thousand Thanks StudioBinder for this Inspiring video.💯💯💯
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
Thank you! A thousand "you're welcomes"!
@forkfighter 24 күн бұрын
This was so fascinating! I didn't know there was a difference between VFX and SFX. It's neat how much we can do with them in tandem. As much as I appreciate CGI, there's just something about practical effects I find charming
@ppytc 25 күн бұрын
I absolutely adore StudioBinder, even as a non-filmmaker. Keep it up, good chaps!
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
Thanks for that!
@JoshLange3D 25 күн бұрын
Another important video from the channel, great job guys! I would only submit that 1)many industry professionals have different definitions of CGI, and 2) previs artists don't "sketch" our work. Instead it's more accurate to say that we "block out" or "rough out" action that later gets finalized by VFX teams.
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
Thanks for the feedback! Those are valuable clarifications.
@baroninternetu3000 20 күн бұрын
Always in the right time! I have this topic today in my classes :)
@Bryan_Rosling 25 күн бұрын
I was waiting for this video. Thank you Studiobinder ❤️
@StudioBinder 25 күн бұрын
Hope you enjoyed it!
@A_M_Bobb 25 күн бұрын
Love that you got Ian on here! Nicely done StudioBinder!
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
Us too! He was a real pleasure to work with. Check out our full interview with Ian: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/r7KVrdqfl7q3o40.htmlsi=pMcaoXBLRot0xfb_
@Sherif-the-Watcher 25 күн бұрын
Ever since i subscribed to dis channel, i feel my knowledge of movie and tv productuction grow Your video about the 12 principles of animation has helped improved my understanding of the fundamentals of animation which has aided in my study of animation for future careers Thank you! Will always be anticipating more from you!😊❤😊
@StudioBinder 25 күн бұрын
That's great to hear! Thanks for watching.
@Sherif-the-Watcher 23 күн бұрын
@@StudioBinder My pleasure!
@hornet718 25 күн бұрын
Love this lesson. I think many of us who were around between the times of Superman and Star Wars, the term Special Effects (Special FX) encompassed everything that was not apart of our real world (ie a man flying without a machine, laser swords or gigantic creatures). Now as technology advanced (going from large machinery to laptop size rendering machines) the lines have become unblurred and defined (love that high resolution!). I appreciate the old days of special effects because of the model building, camera rigs and makeup design had its rough beginnings with creative people solving the problem on set. Now many of those problems can be solved prior to shooting and post production. Either way, I give 4 thumbs up to all the people involved in realm of Special FX (you know how I mean that, LOL). Thank you StudioBinder for another great lesson!
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
Thanks for that! It's true, the definitions and tools have evolved over the years so it makes defining these elements really tricky. But hard work and creative work, no matter the tools, will always be appreciated.
@varuntyagi6116 23 күн бұрын
That was very infomative and as always very entertaining to watch.
@TheMovieRabbitHole 24 күн бұрын
This is a good video. You get bonus point for bringing on Ian who knows what he's talking about
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
Thank you! And we're are HUGE fans of your series on "NO CGI" is really just INVISIBLE CGI" - it's fantastic and we recommend everyone watching our video to watch yours as well. kzfaq.info/sun/PLgdTaHO8FLEve_XFiRBEcOSkRdd-Txjne&si=wk3coCUaQSGC3rmT
@MiguelNdiweni 24 күн бұрын
CGI , VFX and SFX all are great tools in filmmaking Thanks again Studiobinder
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
Agreed! Thanks for watching.
@stephenwilliams3807 23 күн бұрын
There are two great special effect moments for me. The first was the start of the first Star Wars movie (episode 4) and the Imperial cruiser just going and going and going. The second was the dinosaur reveal in the original Jurassic Park. That second one is a great scene on a number of levels, including the acting of Sam Neill and Laura Dern and, of course, the music. Spielberg has always understood that special effects are a tool and that the story is what matters.
@i_drtm 19 күн бұрын
Excellently Explained ❤️
@patrickvinicius8514 3 күн бұрын
Thanks for this video. I think I now have a better understanding of these 3 terms.
@T5five 25 күн бұрын
Thank you Studio binder 🙏
@StudioBinder 25 күн бұрын
Our pleasure!
@trendingtrailers4KUHD 12 күн бұрын
I really needed to understand this thanks
@gumbootnet 7 күн бұрын
I guess someone else has pointed it out already but the shots of the ED-209 in Robocop were not composited onto shots of the boardroom but were actually the stop motion miniature shot in front of a rear projection screen. This was mainly a budgetary constraint.
@peterkalyabe7553 25 күн бұрын
True. I am continuously becoming more literate about the medium, one video at a time. Thanks
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
That's our goal! Thanks for watching.
@bad_writer 18 күн бұрын
Lamo I love the closed captions at 2:02, that's hilarious. And 100% true
@judichristopher4604 24 күн бұрын
EXCELLENT VIDEO as Always.
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
Thank you! Cheers!
@SteinArneJensen 6 күн бұрын
Could you PLEASE make the movie titles shown on screen stand out more from the background. Some of them, particularly when the image is bright are almost impossible to read.
@ramiellinn 19 күн бұрын
What is the first frame of this video?🗿
@Joel-tk3uf 11 күн бұрын
Love lies bleeding : 1hr 35mins into the movie
@jargulusrowrson8327 15 күн бұрын
Wth was the first video? 🤨
@telosevntwlve 4 күн бұрын
Love lies bleeding
@y_fam_goeglyd 4 күн бұрын
It can be hard to see but they always put the name in one of the corners. You might need to pause it.
@flickhunter8900 2 күн бұрын
Love lies bleeding climax scene
@ReanMediaOfficial 25 күн бұрын
Thank you StudioBinder
@StudioBinder 25 күн бұрын
You're welcome!
@user-km1fl2dg3l 14 сағат бұрын
What's the name of the song playing at the beginning?
@olalekanalagbe7515 5 күн бұрын
Thanks so much for this
@TheHighFructoseJefe95 23 күн бұрын
I more or less knew the difference but this helped tremendously. So SFX and VFX are separate. SFX mainly consists of practical effects, so effects that deal with objects or actions. VFX is more focused on perspective. And finally all CGI is VFX, but not all VFX is CGI. Thoughts anyone?
@YAman3053 15 күн бұрын
hey bro what the starting scene????is it a movue???or a game scene ???
@StayFractalesque 8 күн бұрын
I thought the Robocop ED-209 shots were actually ED-209s in front of rear projections? ..thats why theres a noticeable drop in saturation, contrast, and resolution in those shots?
@dharmendrapaikra2557 15 күн бұрын
1st clip in the video was from which movie? 😅
@Mahem3000 19 күн бұрын
Lol I’ve always thought SFX stands for Sound FX
@MuhammadAhmad-zc1il 14 күн бұрын
Me too 😂
@Scroolewse 11 күн бұрын
How is forced perspective VFX rather than SFX? Unless I'm misunderstanding forced perspective is using the camera's perspective to fool the audience into thinking things are bigger or smaller or closer or whatever. This is something happening in front of the camera right? I've also heard painted backgrounds called VFX before (maybe this is just wrong or an attempt to simplify), but I would think they are SFX.
@Inframesdigital 16 күн бұрын
Mastering SFX, VFX, and CGI is key to crafting a compelling story and it requires lots of experience to get it right!
@chetanHkhanapure 15 күн бұрын
Nice infotainment ❤
@Topsrek 25 күн бұрын
All movie sources are written in the video itself on the bottom (sadly sometimes obscured by the youtube interface)
@StudioBinder 25 күн бұрын
Yeah, sorry about that. If you need to know anything specific, let us know!
@Zett76 20 күн бұрын
THX! I was searching for the source of the first scene, for like 10 minutes, just because I didn't see the inserts... 😀
@vicentecampos2893 19 күн бұрын
Very interesting.
@pivanv23 15 күн бұрын
whats the name of the movie with the giant woman?
@writerkuruvaran 24 күн бұрын
Great! We are expecting more Fx videos from Studio binder
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
Will do! Thanks for watching.
@gowthamkumar4622 13 күн бұрын
finally understood the differences
@youthawake 19 күн бұрын
Amazing ❤
@mangeshlawati9051 17 күн бұрын
we salute to the hollywood industry animation artist they really have done very speechless job made us entertain i used to think how did they made about decades ago really a unimaginable job hats off from Asia Nepal
@vikashkumar-fb9mk 15 күн бұрын
00:02 what is that movie
@SAHATK 18 күн бұрын
Thanks dude
@krishnansrinivasan830 25 күн бұрын
Awesome & Thanks :) Quite a learning :)
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
Cheers!
@germz2311 5 күн бұрын
@@StudioBinderhahhtddydfrrrrt🥰
@ROHIT690THAKUR 5 күн бұрын
Who in the hell is that girl in the first scene of the video at 00:00 Which movie is it from?
@c73w 25 күн бұрын
What other ways other than digitally can we make vfx to differentiate between it and cgi
@StudioBinder 25 күн бұрын
I suppose if you shoot all of your elements practically and the combine them digitally, like Nolan did with Oppenheimer. That way, you still get the benefits of VFX without relying too heavily on CGI.
@ahmed_shamim2006 23 күн бұрын
Dune Part Two deep Dive... Make it happen please
@YeboKe 9 күн бұрын
Dear youtube, id rather watch a 1min ad that i cant skip at the beginning of the video than have a 5sec ad that i can skip in the middle of watching...
@DBCooper31 25 күн бұрын
Ian is great, glad to see him on here!
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
Ian is fantastic! We were so happy to work with him.
@mcneu1 21 күн бұрын
14:15 where are these visuals from?
@brandonscullion 20 күн бұрын
The Fountain and What Dreams May Come. Both films have breathtaking vfx.
@agent47tobiasrieper85 20 күн бұрын
Could you make a video on Film Criticism and Film Analysis. How to do Film Criticism and Film Analysis Film Criticism and Film Analysis difference
@feller6766 25 күн бұрын
X (formerly Twitter) users be plugging their ears and closing their eyes if they see this video
@starflakey 25 күн бұрын
😆
@StudioBinder 25 күн бұрын
🙈🙉
@mahmoudmarassi 24 күн бұрын
the first scene of the video for which movie ?
@alexalex-mp8pp 23 күн бұрын
Love Lies Bleeding
@artplanb9688 20 күн бұрын
I am so tired of obnoxious morons of the likes of The Critical Drinker and Nerdrotic, that I almost lost hope for the ability of KZfaq to allow genuine Artistic masters to make it through their algorithm. Thank you guys for a much needed boost of creative inspiration.
@Bluberry31 20 күн бұрын
Bro wtf. I literally just finished watching 1917. So good
@user-nk5ur7th3e 25 күн бұрын
00:00 movie name?
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
Love Lies Bleeding.
@humanityisdoomed 25 күн бұрын
00:00 what is that movie
@tj_nanda 25 күн бұрын
I wanna know as well
@ps2progamer814 25 күн бұрын
love lies bleeding
@StudioBinder 25 күн бұрын
You got it!
@Scroolewse 11 күн бұрын
Is using a computer to add a real thing to the frame VFX or CGI? Like the example where the guy creates multiple versions of himself, if you accomplished the same thing with a computer does that make it CGI? I suppose so but the question popped up because I was thinking it's different from adding something that's entirely made in a computer, like the Pikachu, since you are just using a computer to make the old VFX technique of multiple exposures to create things that aren't actually there easier.
@xsomili5501 25 күн бұрын
1:00 what movie? (Looks like HG Johanna actress)
@dvaerggrisene 25 күн бұрын
it's Contact (1997)
@StudioBinder 25 күн бұрын
You got it! ☝
@xsomili5501 25 күн бұрын
@@dvaerggrisene thanks
@aTADtoofar 23 күн бұрын
It’s not about CGI, it never has been. It’s about the reliance on spectacle over story and a bunch of Hollywood studios believing that spectacle is the best way to bring in audiences to the cinema. CGI is an easy provider of spectacle and Hollywood focuses on this over original cinema as a means of making movies big, fast and easy… so remakes and sequels and reboots are platforms for spectacle and CGI is the means. So when filmmakers say they didn’t use any, it’s an unsaid implication that their film isn’t an instant and lazy made film. Yet, like any tool, used properly, CGI yields amazing results when driven by story.
@GlenCollinsOfficial 25 күн бұрын
You should do the evolution of VFX at ILM.
@StudioBinder 25 күн бұрын
That would be a fun one!
@shivakumarannigowda9983 12 күн бұрын
More n More thanks to you. Great mese ging video 🎂🎂🎂🎂🎂💐❤️🙏. Love❤️ to all teams ❤️🙏.
@aryansindhu2785 13 күн бұрын
Can you please recommend any free video editing course?
@109reaper 8 күн бұрын
Which movie is that giant girl at the start from?
@miksy_lame 25 күн бұрын
This is very usefull thanks for sharing tips for free luv ur content :)
@StudioBinder 25 күн бұрын
Happy to help!
@SAMTHINKS2 25 күн бұрын
I like the examples from this century.
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
Us too! Thanks for watching.
@artemus80j.4 17 күн бұрын
10:18 looks like they forgot to CGI hank's eyes to follow Lennon as he leans forward.
@michaelsanchez0911 25 күн бұрын
Good video. Can you now do director vs producer vs co producer vs executive producer etc
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
That's an interesting topic! We just might.
@KijasFX 21 күн бұрын
So kinda. Visual Effects is a term meaning ANY change to the medium. CGI is apart of the VFX art, not a separate one. SFX is the only one that is off CGI.
@williamshakespeare9815 25 күн бұрын
8:30: Was his assignment to wear a shirt that says "I work in post production"
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
Not sure what you mean.
@Pierronomate 25 күн бұрын
Ian and studio binder 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
A match made in heaven!
@emo1585 17 күн бұрын
By the way thankyou 😊 for the video.
@HMAVlogs7105 20 күн бұрын
Sir,please make next video for steps of shortfilmmaking for beginers
@Searchingtheworld7183 12 күн бұрын
İs there a movie without sfx,vfx or practical efects?
@fixpontt 24 күн бұрын
as a layman i have always thought that CGI means a rendered 3D object on screen while visual effects is removing stuntmen, cables, workers or adding 2D background to the image but not pre-rendered 3D elements
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
VFX covers a LOT, including CGI. So, if there are 3D elements that need to be blended or combined in some way, that's also VFX.
@ChittyCooks 16 күн бұрын
RRR train sequence is one of the examples where all fx are applied
@c73w 25 күн бұрын
8:37 what is this movie?
@wyattwyatt4126 25 күн бұрын
Guardians of the Galaxy vol.2 it's great!
@tj_nanda 25 күн бұрын
I believe it's from Guardian of the Galaxy 2
@Eidolon1andOnly 25 күн бұрын
Bottom right corner of the screen.
@StudioBinder 25 күн бұрын
Yep, Guardians Vol. 2!
@meekbronsen6668 23 күн бұрын
what was that first movie
@alexalex-mp8pp 23 күн бұрын
Love Lies Bleeding
@artisticnajam-xe9ql 17 күн бұрын
2:23 can someone tell that movie name please? that was my last movie that I watched with my dad and I want to watch again! 😢❤
@StudioBinder 17 күн бұрын
That's Peter Jackson's King Kong.
@artisticnajam-xe9ql 16 күн бұрын
@@StudioBinder Thanks
@Mavrikshot 21 күн бұрын
I really thought Sfx was sound effects
@nebulanationmedia 6 күн бұрын
That's me
@i.b1004 24 күн бұрын
2:19 movie name ?
@StudioBinder 24 күн бұрын
That's X-Men Origins: Wolverine.
@Eidolon1andOnly 25 күн бұрын
I'm surprised the absolute masterpiece of VFX/SFX wasn't used as an example: _Who Framed Roger Rabbit?_
@StudioBinder 25 күн бұрын
So many movies we couldn't include, and that's one of 'em!
@jasonbourne5941 22 күн бұрын
The human mind is a beautiful thing and I love being a human 😇
@rosumparat 15 күн бұрын
8:47 "some shots are completely done in cgi like this moment in Wall-E". Some shots?! In case you didn't know the entire Wall-E animation is cgi.
@simoneason1152 Күн бұрын
I cant believe the king of CGI, James Cameron and Avatar, wasnt mentioned
@thomasmacnab480 3 күн бұрын
Gron was hand painted on the negatives.
StudioBinder
Рет қаралды 280 М.
HIMAWARIちゃんねる
Рет қаралды 20 МЛН
StudioBinder
Рет қаралды 4,7 МЛН
WIRED
Рет қаралды 701 М.
StudioBinder
Рет қаралды 1,9 МЛН
Andy Cortes
Рет қаралды 29 МЛН
Влад Закроев
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН
Andy Cortes
Рет қаралды 29 МЛН
Screen
Рет қаралды 2,2 МЛН