Su 30 Has no Future? | Latest Video shows flankers are IR Candle

Su 30 Has no Future? | Latest Video shows flankers are IR Candle | हिंदी में

Рет қаралды 54,794

9 ай бұрын

This is a video on Su 30 Has no Future? | Latest Video shows flankers are IR Candle
Website: thedefencematrix.in/
Discord Link: / discord
Instagram Link: / defence_matrix
Twitter: / defencematrix1
Music : Art of Silence - by Uniq" is under a Creative Commons license (Creative Commons - International Recognition 4.0 - CC BY 4.0)
Intro Music : Credit Karl Casey @ White Bat Audio
*FAIR USE*
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Пікірлер: 290

@Defense_Chamber 9 ай бұрын

Informative video as always, the thing about flanker is that both India and China uses them as a missile truck to achieve air superiority in conjunction with other fighters with relatively small RCS and IR profile. The problem comes when a small nation with handful of fighters uses flankers as their main offensive aircraft.

@arijitdakshi820 9 ай бұрын

With a huge RCS the Su-30 MKI can only function as a standoff aerial platform to launch various smart missiles.

@xyz-iz2kf 9 ай бұрын

@@arijitdakshi820 rcs is around 16😮😮

@Defense_Chamber 9 ай бұрын

@@arijitdakshi820 true

@biswajitbordoloi8092 9 ай бұрын

@@arijitdakshi820that is why IAF is eager to procure 114 MRFA since two decades...

@rahules6090 9 ай бұрын

Rafale : Good concealed IR signature Su 30s : Default glowing like a christmas tree mode IR signature😂

@sachinmesta4238 9 ай бұрын

what is the range of IRST? 200 kms? its less than 100,, so have to go in with say WVR missile which does not have that range, and so have to use say BVR for which you need to use Radar,, so if IRST can detect it, the plane should have missile that has the range to hit at that target.. cheers

@supremeleader5516 9 ай бұрын

Chad Sukhoi

@nishantshrivastava9674 9 ай бұрын

@@sachinmesta4238 Chinese J20 has EOTS.. American EOTS on F35 was able to track a ground missile launch from 1800 km away. Chinese EOTS may be able to track 500 kms at least

@sachinmesta4238 9 ай бұрын

@@nishantshrivastava9674 this is one heck of story, EOTS has a range of 100 kms not the range you say. You got to tell this story to kids who will be excited. EOTS will depend on the size of the source but for present tech the EOTS range is limited to 100 kms not more..

@sachinmesta4238 9 ай бұрын

@@nishantshrivastava9674 You telling this crap about American EOTS is like saying ASTRA has a no escape zone of 2000 kms hilarious

@provocateur-in-chief 9 ай бұрын

Some inaccuracies here, IR tracking is very range limited even the best liquid cooled IRST cannot do over 100 km because of inverse square law. It is not a big problem for MKI but radar is a problem. As a matter of fact, IRST sensor in aircraft cannot lock in, the ir missile seeker has to lock but an aircraft radar can lock in an enemy without the missile xband seeker locking in before launch.

@DefenceMatrix 9 ай бұрын

You can actually lock through IR signature, they can guide the missile to the general direction where missile attains a lock once the target is in Missile’s own seeker’s range, wether it’s IR or RF

@mr.mastermind4840 9 ай бұрын

@@DefenceMatrixIf flankers are using their jammers, it will still not be easy for the missile to get a track onto it. Once the incoming missiles radar gets on the flanker will be aware if they are getting hit by the radar waves. Another thing, if the Su 30Mki is updated with an AESA Radar, it will be the one who will detect everything first unless it is a stealth aircraft

@Moon-no3ts 9 ай бұрын

@@mr.mastermind4840 for 4.5 gen Airframe it holds up for it we need to fast track AMCA

@hritamnath4919 9 ай бұрын

@@mr.mastermind4840jammers won't work against IR guidance as that is passive. You'll need DIRCM (Directional IR counter measure) which most fighters lack anyway (mainly ground attack aircrafts and helos have that to survive from Manpads)

@roy5815 9 ай бұрын

Guys let's be honest, a big IR signature which the flankers have, is a disadvantage. If you are using the best FLIR, you can't see beyond 100-110km, but it is easy to see a flanker than it is to see an F-16 cz flankers are literally the size of private jets. But sure, the AESA upgrade helps it avoid getting that close, but we also need to understand that everyone is getting AESA. While it is capable, distance and RCS factors in. So while an AESA will detect a target further away than a PESA would, it also means that a flanker would be detected first. So if, say an F-16 is being detected at 150-200km by an Su-30, that F-16 has known about the flanker for about a 100 km already. It's a good deterrent, but a tactical disadvantage in most cases...not to mention that it would flag the possible formation around it even if they are LO. You can try the low flying method, but almost all of Pakistani jets can do better at that than flankers. Terrain hugging with a flanker is a bad idea cz of their size. They are relatively easier to pick up against ground clutter, so not very effective, their massive rudders can be picked up by ground based early warning radars, and their availability is not like that of Mirage without using TVC. And the inherent supermanuverability of their airframe is dependent on energy bleeding methods including TVC. Something that no pilot would want at low altitude ....not to mention, it is easier to drive a smaller car than an SUV in traffic. That analogy applies to terrain masking as well. Flankers were designed to be visible cz in that era, it didn't matter. It has big show muscles and it wanted to be seen so that everyone would know to stay clear. No amount of technology can change that thought now.

@sigma-sigma1 9 ай бұрын

To believe that just because su-30mki have huge rcs and IR signature and hence it has no future is not right, one needs to look no further than feb27 post balakot air skrimish incident where a single su-30mki was able to dodge multiple aim-120 amraam rounds which very few any other aircrafts can claim such record by combination of EW measures and superb maneurablity.

@sigma-sigma1 9 ай бұрын

And super sukhoi will make it even better with addition of maws, better ew measures, better aesa radar, better air to air missiles like astra-2/3/asaram, /mica e-derby/python-5.etc and defensive suits like towed decoy, software defined radios., better irst sensors and helmet mounted displays .

@hisokak9112 9 ай бұрын

Also, the Su-30s were able to dodge the AAMRAMs because it was outside of kill zone of said missiles. Within the kill zone, could have been a different story.

@sigma-sigma1 9 ай бұрын

@@hisokak9112inversly at that time su-30mki carried an older version of r-77 which did not permit firing back of air to air missiles if in super sukhoi upgrade if it is able to carry very long range air to air missiles like astra-2/3, r-37m missiles etc then it could have been very large casualties on paf side .

@farahead157 9 ай бұрын

pilot tactics/training has a major role in this scenario a plane is as good as it's pilot.

@sigma-sigma1 9 ай бұрын

@@farahead157 yes.

@puneet90 9 ай бұрын

F15 has a very high RCS as well, approximately 25 m^2. Heavy weight fighters are designed to carry multiple payloads of varying degrees in large numbers. In that role su-30 mki is rightly called "missile truck". Su-30 mki needs a better AESA radar, long range BVRs. Astra MkIII if integrated within 4-5 years (highly unlikely) will make Su-30 mki a real beast. Possibly a high thrust producing engine like AL41 F which powers the Su-35 or a highly efficient low input radar, which we cannot say about Uttam AESA unless it's fully integrated with Su-30 mki. The high angle of attack due to its maneuverability is a "to be trained" skill, a skilled pilot with a good arsenal makes it lethal.

@danishjaved864 7 ай бұрын

F-15 rcs 25 SU-30 rcs - 20 su30mki rcs 25-30 F-15 use very hight tech avionics and long range BVR missiles and US never use them against modern aircraft they use F-35 F-16 F-22 And F-15EX with 5m/s rcs US use in air interceptor role.

@puneet90 7 ай бұрын

@@danishjaved864 And your point is ?

@alankritsharma7640 9 ай бұрын

Some infromation: Radar cross section (RCS) is a measure of how detectable an object is by radar. RCS of various jets : F15 EX: 1.5 to 3 m sq. Su 30 MKI : 4 to 20 m sq. Tejas : 0.5 m sq JF 17 : 3.5 m sq J 20 : 1 to 3 m sq . (Or 0.01, no info available) Rafale : 1 m sq. F 16 : 5 m sq. J10C : 0.5 to 1.5 m sq. (Source : Google) (Edit: I got all outputs from Google SGE generative AI. It maybe wrong in some cases like J20, since no info is available. )

@darthvader5558 9 ай бұрын

Bro the F15 Ex has 1.5-10 Square Meters of RCS and J10C's RCS is said to be 1-3 Square Meters Fun fact - The RCS values of Stealthy jets like F22 and F35 lightning-2 are said to be less than 0.01 Square Meters

@nimaicharan7107 9 ай бұрын

Send the link of j 20 RCS

@Gernsbacker 9 ай бұрын

Do you actually think such sensitive information would be posted for civilians to read on the internet?

@nearchd504 9 ай бұрын

@@Gernsbackeryes

@Gernsbacker 9 ай бұрын

@@nearchd504 Really isn't the case. RCS is far more complex than the average person thinks...

@erwinrommel9137 9 ай бұрын

F 15s are also missile truck but designs relatively better than Flankers and have better air intakes

@james4807M 9 ай бұрын

They have better engines. Russian engines need more space and fuel

@nishantshrivastava9674 9 ай бұрын

3 times costlier as well.

@wankmaster69 9 ай бұрын

Very informative video. This question was floating in my head since last year.

@Mr-rf4ux 9 ай бұрын

We need to focus on Non stealth but near stealth AMCA derivative for Multi role and Air Superiority Performance.

@AbhashRthr1 9 ай бұрын

Aaj pata chala ki vo titanium sheet hai su 30 me

@aneeshnavaikulam 9 ай бұрын

Cant we reduced heat signature upto some extent using paints...and there i one ther thing thing..the infrared signature of mki in the videos is much lesser than that of the Chinese one...is coz usa greater quality FLIR or Chinese substandard metallurgy ?

@rohit9706 9 ай бұрын

No..its a design issue

@aneeshnavaikulam 9 ай бұрын

@@rohit9706 am not talking about 100 percent ir reduction..still upto 10/20 percent...

@alkagupta6810 9 ай бұрын

Day 4 of asking amca vs f 35 and su 57 and tai kaan .

@DefenceMatrix 9 ай бұрын

AMCA doesn’t exist, let’s do it after AMCA’s rollout

@alkagupta6810 9 ай бұрын

yessir

@Ronit_9977 9 ай бұрын

Print (AMCA) #Error, line number 17, 'AMCA' is not defined.

@alkagupta6810 9 ай бұрын

What is your view on whether Pakistan/China can attack India just like Hamas did to Israel?

@AbhashRthr1 9 ай бұрын

@@DefenceMatrix mig 31 par video aane vaali thi uska kya hua ?

@souradeepdas7111 9 ай бұрын

If there is opportunity for it to control an Unmanned aerial vehicle from a SU30, then it can act as a decoy...

@riley_0145 Ай бұрын

Logical

@Thanatos833 9 ай бұрын

Back when IAF purchased Su 30 MKI, our air force was focussed on 4th generation capabilities, like manoeuvrability, etc. Su 30 MKI is very manoeuvrable and has good 4th generation capabilities but in terms of 4++ and 5th generation criteria a small Radar Cross Section (RCS) is vital, and Su-30 has not only a large IR image but more worryingly, a large RCS, meaning it can be easily targeted from long range by radar guided missiles. I think our air force has some sort of fixation on close range dogfighting, even Tejas MK2 has had canards added to it, which improve manoeuvrability but may potentially increase RCS!

@shenanigans4177 9 ай бұрын

Maneuverability is still important today. A missile can easily pull 50G, the best figher pilot can pull 9.5G for milliseconds before blackout. A jet that can change direction fast and accelerate hard is more probable to dodge a BVR missile when using chaff+counterEW.

@narayanyadav9210 9 ай бұрын

In modern warfare, fighter jets are at high risk when facing well-equipped enemies with air defense assets like the S-400, S-500, Pantsir, and laser weapons, along with long-range ground radar and A50U-type AWACS. This makes operating fighter jets very challenging, except when flying at very low altitudes, which also has its own limitations. For instance, Flankers are helpful in delivering guided bombs due to their high payload capacity. However, it's important to note that each fighter jet has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. In the future, Flanker aircraft can be equipped with AESA radar featuring 2000 TR modules, which will provide them with a significant advantage in detecting enemy aircraft much earlier than the enemy's aircraft.

@arkasgkandsciencetutorial3015 9 ай бұрын

🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 As an Indian, I am really obsessed with the news of these type of blunders. Look at PSUs, defense sector, politics... everywhere we are champion in doing blunders. Defense related deals, projects, even at smallest level, are too expensive. That's why high level of corruption prevails here.

@swarnendu2007 9 ай бұрын

By your defination, are US F-15s blunders, are Russian and Chinese Su-30s, Su-30M, J-16 blunders? These planes are built for High missile capacity, High payload, powerful jammers, Long range and High manueverability. And they are perfect for those roles.

@arkasgkandsciencetutorial3015 9 ай бұрын

@@swarnendu2007 I never said that US f-15s are blunders. American equipments are quite better than Russian and Chinese. I just only wanted to say that India should try to copy American technology to some extent.

@Ronit_9977 9 ай бұрын

AMCA will be the replacement of su30, but don't know where is it right now. TEDBF (air force version) can also become a replacement for su30.

@flyingcroc8521 9 ай бұрын

AMCA is medium weight category while MKI is heavy weight category

@Ronit_9977 9 ай бұрын

@@flyingcroc8521 Rafale is also a medium weight fighter.

@matthewmarkus2495 9 ай бұрын

With AMCA we're literally writing the horoscope of an unborn child. Sorry, not sorry.

@RajathHathwar 9 ай бұрын

@anindian1719 bro tedbf will never be replacement of su30mki. Su30mki will be replaced by only hal amca and sixth generation fighter jet. Tedbf will used buy only navy

@nishantshrivastava9674 9 ай бұрын

@@flyingcroc8521 There is no prudent law that a heavy weight fighter should be replaced with a heavy weight fighter only😂😂 Modern warfare and our requirements have changed.. We need medium weight fighters for high altitude warfare that's why we chose GE F414 and not F100 for Amca.

@AlphaBeta007 9 ай бұрын

That's why we should not go 12 additional flankers but atleast 3-4 more sqdn of mrfa/Rafale f4.2.

@aslamkhan-ie6pe 9 ай бұрын

Hey there. Can u make a video on Why india dont make a few Su30MKI as Growlers just like Chinas J16D? So that IAF can have an EW advantage not only from standoff range and also with formation.

@gf-ek9ps 9 ай бұрын

Even the Russian they don't have jets like J16D. How India could make it?

@aslamkhan-ie6pe 9 ай бұрын

@@gf-ek9ps Why cant? I mean we have a large mil. Budget than Russia We can Invest some in R&D and make it one I mean its nt a task of building a complete fighter jet. Just add some of the EW to it.

@fly463 9 ай бұрын

@@aslamkhan-ie6pei think IAF is planning the with super Sukhoi upgrade

@nishantshrivastava9674 9 ай бұрын

@@gf-ek9ps Russians have it with 2 SAP518 pods and 1 SAP 14 pods.. It was used in Ukrainian war.. Russians jst didn't name it.

@anujitganguly2029 9 ай бұрын

Good discussion

@2PistonRolling 9 ай бұрын

Sir same is applicable for F16, Hornet, F15 this aircraft are from same time more or less? Can you share some light on this as well?

@pillaianupr 2 ай бұрын

Su 30 and f15 thermal signatures would be similar I guess. Also importantly we didn’t have any option to pick from when we decided to go with Su 30. It was the best available fighter for India at that time.

@thelungilife6057 9 ай бұрын

We've been assembling these locally for decades and still havent been able to increase their composites share by weight. Pretty sad, HAL.

@GulshanKumar-gf8sl 9 ай бұрын

Hello sir...i just want to ask...whole Russian airforce ki using similar platform and dominating whole Europe including usa..... Next....every aircraft has its deferent role...kindly compare f 15 and su 30.with there I r signature Don't play the agenda

@knightheart3482 9 ай бұрын

Sorry to inform you but RAF domination is thing of past ( pre war ) , currently it is even struggling in Ukrainian air field. Russian fighters are not bad but in this war we have seen that they are not that effective because of advance anti air systems and avionics that can easily detect Russian fighters which have huge RCS and thermal signature. And currently forget about dominating US Air force, it's unable to dominate even strong Europeans countries. I'm also a Russian supporter but we have to be practical here.

@CatOfCulture 9 ай бұрын

The Russians don't have a full production 5th generation fighter, how are they supposed to be dominating the whole Europe including the USA?

@KUNALBISWAS-NEWS-TECH-SHORT 9 ай бұрын

J16 is very different from J11 or SU30MKI,MKK or MKM, the use of composite is comparable to Tejas..

@immortalgaming5478 9 ай бұрын

su 30s can be used as backup aircrafts which will give cover to other small fighters in front because su30 can easily carry long range missiles

@arijitdakshi820 9 ай бұрын

As recent conflicts reveal that the direction is towards massive missile strikes to determine land battle outcomes, bypassing air, sea and space manned force platforms. This is especially even more foreboding if the conflict turns nuclear ☢️.

@Arianne3011 9 ай бұрын

Can someone please answer these couple of queries I have from watching this video: *(a)* Does coating earlier generations fighter aircrafts (that are not stealthy) with Radar Absorbing Paint help them in reducing their IR signature to any extent at all? And *(b)* If yes; then wouldn't it be prudent for HAL and others to use IAF's massive fleet of 'SU-30 MKIs' for experiments re: Radar Absorbing Paints and other Materials they must be surely working on for India's homegrown 5th Gen. Fighter and Stealth/Stealthy Drones already in works with them?

@mns4 9 ай бұрын

Already used f15 ex with radar absorbing paint

@manas2656 9 ай бұрын

Well radar absorbing is different from IR signature. It'll only lessen the detection by radar.

@adityakumarpradhan_ 9 ай бұрын

IR signature depends upon the temperature of the object but RADAR signature depends upon the Radiowave signal reflected from the object

@VinodKumar-zm3vl 8 ай бұрын

The idea is good, but the cost benefit analysis has to be looked into for this. Sometimes the aero refitting escalates into a very big drag financially. Also, it could have an effect on other things like performance, manouverability,availablity( more maintenance per hour of flying) etc.

@solemo69 9 ай бұрын

Great video, and wow so asian raptor is not a as good as Indian FB warriors wanted us to believe. You will be lit up pretty fast if you are a big candle in the air :D

@user-sf3dj9is8h 9 ай бұрын

This shows that our planners were not that forward thinking, but India didnt had an alternative option than buying from Russia, this is a giant beautiful air truck but this can be used as long range bomber Which other aircrafts lack in India, sukhoi 30 should be combined rafael and tejas.

@knowledgeseeker8546 9 ай бұрын

Since 2000s it's quite evident that they are good for bombing type of role once air dominance is achieved by rafale type fighters.... But iaf employs them for air dominance itself that's like shooting in your own foot

@vishwparmar4656 9 ай бұрын

Some exfarts like you think that they are more intelegent than top military leadership and iaf 😂

@bebyfun 9 ай бұрын

तेजस के लिए क्या रूसी एंटी शिप मिसाइल भी भारी होगा? क्या भारी टाइप का quadcoptor से AToA मिसाइल दागा जा सकता है जब AToG बॉम्ब, मिसाइल,ATGM फायर कर रहे?

@Hassankhan-cn9wu 9 ай бұрын

upgraded engine will be based on izdeli 30 or AL-41F1s?

@manojkarunakaran8604 9 ай бұрын

The new 12 SU30 MKI which we are taking HAL should ensure that the body is made of composite material.

@saljitb 9 ай бұрын

I think the IR from the J11 is said to be from a few meters off the B52.. hence the kind of thermal signature..... the SU30 is more like a truck when vectored by a lead aircraft or awcas.. with better and long range aesa it might be able to shoot down a f16 or any aircraft with the western neighbours as soon as it takes off..😊 don't think anyone comes this one in a conflict situation these guys can decimate enemy once suppression of air defence has been done..

@sumitron2k 9 ай бұрын

i always used to wonder why they don’t paint that patch .. now i came to know it’s titanium and maybe added later. ( still can be painted)

@nitwit2011 9 ай бұрын

Is it advisable to buy F15EX in MRFA ?

@arvindsharma788 9 ай бұрын

He is mixing IR signature and RCS. IR has range and other limitations. Chinese aircraft flew very rather dangerously close to USAF aircraft.

@DefenceMatrix 9 ай бұрын

Nobody is mixing both things, IR signature of Flakers are more prominent and they will be visible on IRST sensors from far away in comparison to Rafale or any other 5th Gen aircraft

@beingethicalwithlogics3113 9 ай бұрын

Jai Hind 🇮🇳

@abdulbasit4791 9 ай бұрын

Please do a video on the pakistani BW20,CW39 and CW56 rifles produced by the pakistan ordinance factories.We would love to know your opinion on this topic.

@randmht9976 9 ай бұрын

Tejas MK2 & Airforce version of TEDBF are the only options for our future. Sadly no seriousness is being showed by our Military and Government for these projects.

@krushnakatke4175 9 ай бұрын

ज्यादा Infrared signature की वजह से SU 30 MKI को बेकार समझना बेवकूफी है. कोई भी आधुनिक विमान इसके साथ dogfight में उलझनें से पहले अच्छी तरह से सोचेगा और लडाई में यही सबसे महत्वपूर्ण बात होती है की कोई विमान कितनी देर तक survive कर सकता है. Survive करने मे SU 30 MKI को महारथ हासिल है.

@shamikchoudhury5924 2 ай бұрын

IAF has decided to upgrade SU30 so that it continues to use it till 2040 onwards. They have also looking for more to take care of the losses. So, I believe there is a reason for IAF is doing that. They know what is right. So, I hope we can be rest assured about this Aircraft.

@warrior_singh111 9 ай бұрын

F15EX ka IR signature bhi esa hi hoga😂😂😂😂

@singatakberpura 9 ай бұрын

Do a molding for all parts out of composite

@yixinmei5854 9 ай бұрын

Dude this video is shot by pods on B-52, targeting a J-16 fighter just meters away......... Even a digital camera can shoot at that distance.

@coolkal7590 9 ай бұрын

Yeah Whereas the IBRIS-E can detect even fighter sized aircraft at 400 kms (even lock for the R-37M) 100 kms passively with IRST Just propaganda hubris

@user-mu8zp8ef1r 9 ай бұрын

we should think of coating it with composite materials to reduce IRS signature

@Stephen7344 9 ай бұрын

Atleast its half the RCS of the F15.

@Abhi-ph9fz 9 ай бұрын

How many aircraft models can one point that spread zero ir signature?

@VinodKumar-zm3vl 8 ай бұрын

Mki's with astra series is already a force multiplier for IAF post balakot, where iaf had severe limitation to exploit full A2A potential of mki's due to old russian a2a package of mki's. Desi iterations will take this platform a long long way in iaf priorities.

@mohd.vaseem7410 9 ай бұрын

bro what do you think of tb3 drone

@aryangyansingh3826 9 ай бұрын

For me the su should get an engine upgrade like even if only 100 of them get it for me the main work should be done in avionics especially for ew suit and it should be as same level as rafale as rafale has jammed su 35 radar so ew suit is must and cats warrior should be intrigated in su first and some amount of alloy should be used in near engine area to improve its ir signature Pls make video on arjun mk 2 vs mordern day tank western and chineese tank only

@COPYHNITRADERS 9 ай бұрын

India should paint them with special coating so as to reduce IRST

@cvshahshah6441 9 ай бұрын

क्या su 30 की ir signature को छिपाने के लिए एल्युमीनियम बोडी के उपर कोई coating नहीं कर सकते ?

@warrior_singh111 9 ай бұрын

Virupaksh AESA radar🔥🔥can track jet from 250-300 km away,with that Meteor and Astra mk3 can bhi launch from very far away range,

@deebeshprasad7697 9 ай бұрын

Non thermal paint bhi lagya ja sakta hai

@Siddharth_shivshankar 9 ай бұрын

The Flanker maybe an IR candle but Sukhoi in simple words is like Heavy Weight Boxer, Although it maybe not as smart as a Rafale or Tejas but it can be converted into a Heavy Bomber or a Wild Weasel or Fighter Similar to American FA-18 Growler also. Although its an outdated but as long as we are keeping them we need to do some smart thinking. It can also be easily compared With the American F-15 Jets

@hsjawanda 9 ай бұрын

Saying that Rafale's weapons payload & range are comparable to SU-30MKI is misleading. The max range quoted for Western fighters is with external fuel tanks, which doesn't allow them to carry as many weapons, while the max payload figure is given without any external fuel tanks, which means that they can't reach the max quoted range. This is deliberate obfuscation by Western marketing. Western fighters can't achieve max range with max payload. Su-30MKI's max range is typically given with full internal fuel.

@anantgautam2485 9 ай бұрын

So rafale will fly top cover for su30.and Tejas below su30 is it?

@adityamookerjee. 9 ай бұрын

Isn't the F-15 EX similar to the Flanker family of aircraft in many ways? If so, how are the Americans dealing with the situation? Can the F-15 EX, super cruise? Perhaps, If jet fighters don't use afterburners when flying, then that makes them more stealthy. No jet fighter uses afterburners in air to air combat, or when attacking a ground target.

@Shubham-1999 9 ай бұрын

its bit smaller than su30, secondly modern f15s have much better avionics than russians. Aim 120D is far superior to russian AAMs.on top of that they almost always operate with AWACS, f35 etc. providing it with great stuational awareness.

@nishantshrivastava9674 9 ай бұрын

When u design any fighter jet with minute attention to details like suppression of IR signature.. Cost increases. F15 EX is 3 times costlier.

@shatrujeetdubey3204 9 ай бұрын

Other aircrafts: Use stealth, Jamming etc. Meanwhile Flankers: Bash on regardlessly.

@aemssw2387 9 ай бұрын

Its heavy fighter , Good when u have Air dominance or as Lightweight Bomber

@aer.onavel 9 ай бұрын

Sukhoi will always be a potent platform as it can carry huge bunch of missiles and bombs and this aircraft can be used for autonomous flight system

@amitkalita001 9 ай бұрын

That was a Chinese jet copy of su 30. Not orginal su 30

@rohitkamble9619 9 ай бұрын

In op Swift Retort PAF fired several Amercan missiles from long ranges and flanker dodged all of them... As per public records and defence KZfaq channels

@sauravghosh7064 9 ай бұрын

Rafale aur inke beech mein satlink accha hona chahiye Ye piche rahe 300km piche aur rafale agaye reh kar combat kare but Jo rafale dekhe wo ye dekh paye Aur special heavy long range missile se attack kar paye ,range se bahar reh kar

@ranadeepjash1150 9 ай бұрын

We can easily made wings and flaps of su30 mki with catbon fiber. China already built flankers with carbon composite. With new materials in wings, nose cone, and canopy su 30 mki can reduce its IR and infrared signals considerably. It may not produce the results of a fresh design but with experiments with nose, wings and air intake will give us good results. For this we need ambition, good research and we lack both.

@SuputraBharathi 9 ай бұрын

If you keep me in charge of overhauling of SU 30 mki .. 45 days per plane and 7 crore per plane ... I can reduce its IR Signature by 50% or more .. If India have more money to spend per air craft ...I R signature of Indian planes will seamlessly blend in with atmosphere with error of plus or minus 5 °C ... Well China made their plane with carbon composite just to make it invisible .. but carbon composite also have IR signature ... Indeed great engineers .. What they did with aluminium scrap did they made soda cans out of it .. 😂

@ranadeepjash1150 9 ай бұрын

@@SuputraBharathi they donated it to fund your education. I already mentioned that using new material will provide less satisfactory results but freshly designed aircraft take 30 years to come.all countries are updating their aircraft old body with new composite.

@nishantshrivastava9674 9 ай бұрын

Unrealistic expectations from PSUs. Municipal Corporation me bhi bahot reforms ho skti h bt ho nhi skti

@ranadeepjash1150 9 ай бұрын

@@nishantshrivastava9674 basically we are not offensive power. Just like America before ww2 we are internal looking pacifist society. But in the time of ww2 America brought in its industrial might and built military hardware. But today military hardware are extremely complex and can't be built during war. Just like previous cold war our policy maker think this cold war will not affect us. But they are not realising that this time this is happening right next to us against our main enemy china. The way military expenditure is going down compared to GDP amd the delays in sanctions of projects seems to our policy maker reluctance to accept ground reality. As if we are in 90's decade and everyone is focus about economy.

@zahidabbasi4637 9 ай бұрын

In case of PL 15 BVR export version with 180km cary by Junk fighter Jf 17 where you hide Rafale

@khalilahmed-jp6qe 8 ай бұрын

These will expose Rafael also to radar if operated in groups..

@lokmaankunwar4330 9 ай бұрын

🙏

@Pranith_ 9 ай бұрын

In case of IAF Jaggu dada ke retirement ke baad naval strike and ground strike missions su 30s responsibility. While Rafale/MMRCA for and AMCA for air superiority, SEAD, especially AMCA - behind the enemy line strikes. LCA for point defence, air policing, interceptor. When situation is ideal su 30mki and LCA can compliment others in various missions.

@namitaranideb4064 9 ай бұрын

Video ka volume kam hai, mujha yea laga. Kripya yea bishoy thora dhyan digiaga.

@strawhat9319 9 ай бұрын

What are chances of super Sukhoi mki vs f16 viper.

@coolkal7590 9 ай бұрын

A ceramic/CMC-CNT skin is the best option Reduces both radar & IR signature + more durable than just RAM coating This is also why F-15EX would be the worst choice in MRFA Another double digit RCS aircraft is the last thing we need

@smilingxassassin 9 ай бұрын

Its old but not obsolete.

@tatsavitar7281 9 ай бұрын

Ab toh bus tejas MK2 dekhne ki iccha he bachi hai iske bad main sukoon se chala jaunga upar.

@ashisbose6181 9 ай бұрын

If stealth coating given then irst much decreased.

@rakeshgogoi5158 9 ай бұрын

Nope, composite materials, changing the anti radiation plane design nd stealth coating will do something, but still Sukhoi is the perfect for close in dog fight😎

@ashisbose6181 9 ай бұрын

@@rakeshgogoi5158 full stealth is depends on structure and composite material 75%.remaining 25 % depend on coating So coating must decreased irst. Ews also create at least 3 minute stealth by creating 12 false su30 surrounding original su30. It called towed decoy it create original su30 irst and enemy rader think 13 su30 present in enemy ground and airborne rader. So don't underestimate drdo capability. This reason hal says super su30 fifth generation. Gradually u know all. Just wait.

@deepakkumar-uj2bx 9 ай бұрын

Same thing apply on f15 silent eagle

@nishantshrivastava9674 9 ай бұрын

No.. F 15EX r designed to keep this problem in check.. That's why cost increases.

@hemantbrijay2072 9 ай бұрын

What is current status of mig 35 and future in Russian air force and Indian Airforce

@biswajitbordoloi8092 4 ай бұрын

Long range stand-off missiles.

@souravismanu 9 ай бұрын

Flancer is king of air to air combat. It's complete air supurity fighter.

@kkhalifah1019 9 ай бұрын

As if the SU-30 is the only "IR candle" in the world of combat aircraft.

@sumanneogi2679 9 ай бұрын

Rafael is of same gen as su 30 it required new jammer radar engine and fire control computer but since it's size is huge huge radar canbe install negating its disadvantages so saying a fighter irrelevant due to stealth is radar not right ther biplane ww1 has lowest radar ccs and moder pulse Doppler radar can't detect it

@parthasdasgupta 9 ай бұрын

It's a problem no doubt. 5 th generation aircraft can trace you even you are 200 Km away.

@HarishKumar-ic6wr 9 ай бұрын

salute my all Bharat Army sir ji jai Bharat

@debdulalbanerjee1 9 ай бұрын

Samaj me ehi aya India jab ki serious mission like Balakot me jayga tab western sytem hi chiye, eh Russian khatara nehi chelega.

@cocotaco759 9 ай бұрын

First

@spikeguard 9 ай бұрын

If this aircraft frame is made with composite materials or covered with composite materials, it becomes a stealth aircraft. It's quite possible this is how China has made their so called stealth aircraft.

@HarshGupta-my5pk 9 ай бұрын

Use mirrors as f22 uses to hide ir signature of su 30

@dkq986 9 ай бұрын

Basically we have 2 squads of modern fighters😢

@gajendrasbhanot6259 9 ай бұрын

Jai hind

@rogue8740 9 ай бұрын

Hum first hum first

@kartikeypant4387 9 ай бұрын

Thik hai Bhai thik hai.👍

@saiprateek5779 9 ай бұрын

Bhai yeh Gangs of Wasseypur wala dialogue bahut famous rehta hai defence channels me..

@TheLargeoldshoe 9 ай бұрын

itne nazdik se sab airplane ir candle jaise lagenge

@sauravghosh7064 9 ай бұрын

Flanker jaisa haathi jahaj pehli baar hide hi kyo karna ???? Ye toe air superiority hone k baad ground attack karne k liye

@muktiprateekdas9769 9 ай бұрын

They never had any future air force wanted mirrages but due to massive corruption they had to buy su 30 its a un usable plane in real combat with a equiped adversary