People sign NDA's all the time. I had to sign once for a job. And Stormy Daniels didn't honor the NDA. Trump should get his money back plus interest.

​@@protorhinocerator142 She was ultimately released from the NDA, I believe in 2018.

@@barryhall5125 But not released by Trump. She was released by some activist judge.

@@protorhinocerator142 He kind of did. He filed a motion that he would not bring action to enforce any of the terms of the NDA, adding that he never claimed to be a party to it. Which was true. Michael Cohen filed a similar motion at that time.

It was an election interference case.

See how Trump and justice still win! Trump2024!!!

that's putting it mildly

So, kids, a jury of 12 folks picked from a pool of 200 sat through several weeks of testimony and presentation of documents, paid close attention by all accounts, and found Trump guilty. Just because Trump says he did nothing wrong, just because you happen to not like him being held accountable, just because he is a candidate for public office are not adequate reasons to ignore the law and the finding of the jury.

And that worked out so well for the democrats!! Trump 2024!!!

If you believe a New York Appeals Court dominated by Democrats will overturn the rulings of a Democrat Criminal Courts judge, you are delusional.

Actually, it was a stalling tactic. All on the taxpayers dime no less.

It didn’t work

That’s exactly what it was. that’s why they had stormy Daniels telling stories about sex when they had nothing to do with the case. it was supposed to be about falsified documents which were falsified by Michael Cohen. They played that salacious testimony on every news program on repeat. The porn star that was extorting a presidential candidate was suddenly everybody’s hero. Wait until you hear what the Supreme Court has to say about that. Because there’s a law specifically against irrelevant testimony.. They refused to allow the election official testify that would explain the alterations in the financial documents . But they let that freaking porn star gold digging slut play victim after she got paid for the confidentiality agreement. which by the way she defaulted on and will now have to pay Trump. Why wasn’t Michael Cohen and stormy Daniels charged with extortion?

Just like Joe Biden.

And everyone else involved in perpetrating this abuse.

Never. No basis for it.

It is ironic - judges have absolute immunity for their official conduct.

@@chriskelly1890 You sound delusional.....Joe is that you ?

In time, if inequities were carried out,the judge most certainly will be held to account, legally.

Was there even enough evidence to prove that it ever happened?

He was never charged with paying hush money. He was charged with falsifying business records to influence a "federal" election. The records were not false they were booked as payments for legal services. What legal services? Organising a non disclosure agreement which is legal. The case was Judicial fraud.

@@jimdent351 Yes, plenty of proof that there was an NDA. But that isn't illegal. The alleged illegal part was the bookkeeping relating to it.

Bookkeeping was correct. Entries were correct and payments were made. No fraud or errors occurred. Any accountant can dispute the states case.

Apparently it was an nda for like 2015 to 2020 and expired, the alleged crime was claiming it as like a campaign finance for taxes or whatever

And hopefully Javier Milei

Trudeau has to go, but for the record Poilievre has no ideas. He has only run on the distain for Trudeau. Don't expect things to improve.

@@debussy843 it's hopefully better than whatever fascism Trudeou is running

​@@debussy843yes the damage cause by trudeau is irreversible at this point. It's too late now already.

Nigel Farrage 👌

In another words, human nature ( good or bad ) will some what kicks in...

Yeah, the Docs case Judge is clearly biased for Trump. That trial should have started weeks ago and she keeps delaying it for bogus reasons. I suspect an investigation into her finances are in order.

and the SCOTUS?

That depends on the integrity of the judge though too.

Not necessarily so. Republicans respect the constitution particularly wrt separation of powers. Democrats do not respect the constitution and think they have the authority to make laws in all three branches of government, and the bureaucracy too.

How could he be? He was simply making up his own law along the way.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@@Aaronwhatnow Stop laughing, you dumb piece of shit!

That's true. He's been treated FAR BETTER than anyone else would have been. Should have been jailed several times for gag order violations.

Why wasnt he treated fairly?

@@SenorJuan2023 See, postings as yours just reinforce the impression that some people want the judiciary to eliminate Mr. Trump from political competition.

Yes you have! It has not gone unnoticed. The Show Me state living up to its name!

I should be dismissed but don't hold your breath.

The one in the Docs case that is heavily biased for Trump?

@@SenorJuan2023 A keyboard + your first full bong of the day = that comment. Thanks for the laugh!

@@uraswami8077 Tell us you don't follow the cases without telling us you don't follow the cases.

​@@SenorJuan2023Okay..."You don't follow the cases."

@@SenorJuan2023 Tell us that you swill the Blue Koolaid without telling us. But then, you just did!

We'll remind them once again, and once again, they'll learn absolutely NOTHING. TDS is a terrible affliction.

This comment shouldn't be pinned on every video regarding these cases!😂

Yeah, you are. Trump is guilty as sin in the other cases too. That's why he keeps delaying them. Use some critical thinking skills. WOW

We the people are the Majority who since before 2016 have rejected Trump.

Stop feeding the obvious BOT.... designed for FOX and MAGA m0r0ns

@@edthebumblingfoolnot anymore you’re not 😂

Nope, he's going to be sentenced to jail in September, despite what this law school flunkee thinks.

@@SenorJuan2023 Nnnnnnope.

​@@richardlafleur8389for the sake of the world, can't happen soon enough!

@@richardlafleur8389 Trump is on course to be sentenced in jail come September. hahahahahaha

@@josefeibl8230 Will be jailed in September. LOL

"Order an immediate retrial" - are you joking? Do you actually think trials happen instantaneously or overnight. They certainly don't. This isn't the UK.

GABBARD? why not invite a wolf into the henhouse LOOK AT HER VOTING RECORD AS A SENATOR ON 2 A cases.. shes a snake..

are you insane? non of these people are qualified to hold any public office.

@@edthebumblingfool Considering the collection of freaks in the Biden administration, Tulsi and Vivek seem quite harmless in comparison.

@@edthebumblingfool And Michelle Obama, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden or Kamala Harris are? ROTFLOL

Good call, but I would like to see Vivek as Attorney General

God often takes evil and uses it for good according to his will. Sometimes, I think he allowed Joe Biden to be president to really expose how corrupted our government really is. I now a lot of Americans probably had little trust in the government, I, for one, was surprised to see just how deep that corruption went. To see how government institutions like the FBI, DOJ,and CIA can totally abandon working for the people and just go completely rouge.

yeah right,....yawn.

You mean the case where Jack Smith’s “agents” altered evidence, that case?

Not a hush money case. Charged as a business expense violation. Jack burned himself by adding "Top Secret" cover pages, that were not part of the evidence. He admitted to tampering with evidence. No admissible evidence, no case.

No, what makes the hush money case eligible is the evidence Bragg used to prosecute the case. The evidence used was dated after Trump was elected president starting in February of 2017. Trump claimed executive privilege on that evidence . Now that there is some presidential immunity involved that evidence may no longer be admissible. It may be thrown out. Then Bragg would have to start over. The problem was that Bragg and Merchan were so quick to get a conviction that they didn't wait to see what the SC immunity ruling would be.

I believe he will declare a mistrial. It's a much more graceful outcome for the judge than being reversed for due process violations. As for Missouri's suit, it is strictly about the 1st Amendment. They can't sue because Trump's rights were violated, only their own. The 1st Amendment isn't only the right to speak, but also the right to hear. This is how Missourians have standing.

@@barryhall5125 I understand it's only a 1st Amendment issue for Missouri and that's how they will argue standing, but the violation of the 1st Amendment arose from an unconstitutional prosecution. Would SCOTUS only consider the validity of any sentencing which restricted Missouri 1st Amendment rights, or would it consider the validity of the trial and verdict?

@@peterlegg7456 I'm certain SCOTUS would only address the gag and potential sentencing. First, that's the only relief Missouri's asking for. Second they are loathe to intervene in the usual appeal process. And in fact since the sentence has not yet been pronounced, the judge could conceivably set aside the jury's verdict (fat chance I know) so an appeal would be unnecessary. Stranger things have happened, and I'd be truly surprised if even stranger things DON'T happen between now and the election!

But Bragg used a federal law to help prosecute it. The Federal Election Commission law. Which they had no jurisdiction to bring. If remember, the statue of limitations had run on on the state misdemeanor charge.

So long as there is no successful 'funny business' as there was in 2020, President Trump will handily defeat the corpse, come November.

@rightlyso8507 Agreed. But we both know that the demented left is already over their heads in funny business. We just have to overwhelm the polls and mail-in voting. #TooBigToRig TRUMP 2024🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲

@@christiancarrazana9534 The issue is when and how the evidence was obtained. The testimony of several key witnesses is based on "official" communications. Thus, those discussions would not be allowed as evidence in a trial under the Supreme Court ruling.

Not about the Presidential immunity. It's the fact the rules weren't followed. Appeal will easily overturn the conviction.

@@stanleyday7293 No, it wasn’t based on official acts. An official act is when the president is exercising his core constitutional powers.

@@stanleyday7293 you should read the opinion again. The context of the communications were not official, as Trump wasn’t exercising his powers as president but instead as a private individual. Just because some of the communications took place within the White House, doesn’t mean that it was official.

@@christiancarrazana9534 You could be correct. The talking head in the original piece had the opinion regarding the source of the evidence.

Barnes has been talked about as a possible choice for Attorney General, if and when President Trump gets back in the White House.

sounds like soy talking... you need a crayon and some plushies to get you over this big guy?

You thought the walls were really closing in this time, didn’t you

Willing to vote Trump if you're wrong?

Robert Barns has forgotten more about US State and Federal law and the US constitution than you could ever know; so there's that.

I'll take his guesses over your "facts" any day, Colin. 🤭

America is broken

Based on ?

It’s broken now, this will partially correct it

"If it doesn't work the way I want it to, it's broken! WAAAAAAH!" Spoken like the truly triggered manlet you are, Kaaron. 🤭

It was broken once Democrats began using the courts against their opponents.

Too bad for you and your teedie comrades that's simply not going to happen. 🤭

Because that's what Leftist Stalinists do, they weaponize the justice system against the opposition to gain political advantage!

Not ever going to happen, do you not listen to the Supreme Court? do you not see that Merchan has put off sentencing until AT LEAST SEPTEMBER because he knows he is going to have to thrown the entire case out and then bragg is going to have to try the entire thing again... are you dense? or [retarded]?

Trump will not serve even one day in prison and will not be a "convicted felon". Trump is NOT "above the law". Presidential immunity IS THE LAW. The JUDGE is not above the law. The case will be declared a mistrial. The verdict will be vacated. The Judge messed it up by allowing inappropriate evidence and testimony to be presented over defense objections of immunity. He should have waited for the SCOTUS decision before starting the trial. 🤷‍♂ Haste makes waste!

The FEC found the Clinton Campaign had Violated Campaign Finance Laws... Because they used $1 Million of Campaign Funds to BUY the Fake Russia Dossier. The Campaign ADMITTED Guilt and paid a Fine. The REAL Crime was Federal Election Interference. Aided and abetted by the Rogue FBI. Funny that even after being PROVEN to have Lied to the FISA Court many times.. NOBODY @ FBI ever got in ANY trouble. Smells like Fascism at work. *******

No he's not above the law. But the law should not be contorted to get one man, that's what banana republics do, not first world countries. If you think it's ok to go look for a crime to get Trump, you are equally insane as the cabal of Democrats in the States and if it happens to your side in future, you brought it on yourself!

You say that while they have not even indebted the Bidens for influence trafficking.

I hear the 'moron' alarm siren going off on this one.

Guilty of what ? Funny all these people who say that , can’t tell what he did

Grifter? Trump's net worth went down during and immediately after his presidency. The Clintons, Obamas, Bushes, Bidens, Pelosi, McConnell, Waters, etc. are true political grifters whose net worth increased by tens of millions. This is not supported by their govt. salaries and reasonable capital gains! Don't let the facts get in your way!!!