She’s great tbh

I am an adopted child. I concur.

​@@theolamarshall-bernardsame here! When you adopt, that child is now YOUR child and should be referred to as simply that.

I loved that bit! Judge Vonda is 🔥!!! How mouthy he is, should have been taken in contempt of court!

Its scripted so they had plenty of time to write it lol

These comeback always leave people a little speechless😂

This was the best line!

@@elderford989 you

LOL!!! It’s my favorite phrase.😁

You just know what's coming to you when she says that... ahah

⁠@@JudgeVondaBI love that phrase

Wow Thanks for sharing, I just found this channel good to know I have at least 2 days and counting, I'm very excited 👍

omg yes. this was the best one yet

I've almost ran out of episodes 😭

There's not enough episode 😭 I've ran out :(

It’s a decent show , but this are re-enactments , actors not real couples

You know she bout to get them when she says that. I REALLY get into the popcorn THEN 😂😂

I wait just for that line lol

Nice line to use in the office

OR… “ I got to stop asking these questions”.

Bobby Lucas Yessssss hunny yessss😂👏🏾

🤦🏿‍♀️🤦🏿‍♀️🤦🏿‍♀️😭😭😭🤣🤣🤣🤣

YES...👊...🤣😫🤣😫🤣

It’s fake

Cold with it

There not actors lol

@@carlitojones2082 yes they are lmao 11:04

Oh my goodness this isnt real?

Show proof then?? Why would you go into a court and fake a case god that’s dumb as shit

@@gusgus2062 at 11:04 Thats the proof. these are scenarios for education purposes. Vonda isn’t even a judge either she’s a licensed attorney. I thought they were real too but then realized why would she talk at the end in front of the same people who just argued explaining the case.

That's cause you're responsible, no matter what happened, thank you for being the dad my ex forgot how to be.

Thank you so much!

They are actors FYI

What is also informative...In some states if a MAN mentors a child and spends a huge amount of time with the child, and never having a relationship with the mother at any level..... That dizzy EVIL BITCH can file for CHILD SUPPORT .....CHILD SUPPORT is a God Damn scam and this Satanic Family Court system knows this. As these Judges also get there Indirect CUT $$$ too....period

@@MrEzee777 the judges don’t get an indirect cut. It’s their job, so they are paid a wage. Parents are responsible for taking care of their children. Being bitter at a past relationship doesn’t remove your obligation as a parent

Fictional?

@@nope7854 yes these are reenactments of actual cases, not the real people involved. And if I'm not mistaken, vonda b is a lawyer, not a judge.

@@jessdickinson9906 you do know every judge was a lawyer at some point

I say this all the time. It's my favorite phrase

Thank you!!

There is no jury in this show. The people you see are not jury, or actors, they have been before the judge

@@madelinebryson I thought in the very end of the episode, they put a disclaimer about these being stories being examples. It's still really good examples.

​@madelinebryson they are actors.

OMG 😮 I’ve just started watching this program from Australia 🇦🇺. I thought they were real cases 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🐨

He will probably go and have a vasectomy.

As a single father that spent the last 18 years raising my sons and also a first hand victim of lies to police and dcfs and having women in my own family try to help my ex violate court orders, women surely dont have the moral high ground.

Or before he bumps uglies with some woman he just met.

and women

FACT: In some states if a MAN mentors a child and spends a huge about of time with the child, and never having a relationship with the mother at any level..... That dizzy EVIL BITCH can file for CHILD SUPPORT .....CHILD SUPPORT is a God Damn scam and this Satanic Family Court system knows this. As these Judges also get there Indirect CUT $$$ too....period

The correct thing to do would be to base his child support office $50,000 a year income not what he has in property she could say okay you have to sell that property and put half of it in an account for his son when he turns 18 that would be the correct way to do it

Calvin Williams i think your the dumb one Kevin is right.

Iiiiiiiii .uk 8

Right sell your parents (that passed away) property and assets to make ends meet your not making 40k on the cows every year to make it fair to about a 60k year salary that's making an extra 10k more than his job I bet the property and cows dont bring anything in all the cows do is provide enough for in home milk and maybe selling some milk to neighbors and friends if it was a farm that made living off cow milk had all the machinery that helps produce milk and store it and you made 40k pff that exactly then I could understand but no way in hell I'd sell my deceased parents property because of a God damn close to 2k a month child support that's 24 k a year that's 1k of being half his actual income property should have nothing to do with it thats like oh well he inherited a 100k dollar dog and thats an asset cause you can make money off that dog I'm going to make you pay substantially more because you have an expensive dog you inherited like this one episode doesnt make q shot tone of sense to me

This bitch is crazy.. just because you have assets doesn’t mean you’re making money off them.. what kinda math is she doing ?

Did you request childsupport and backpay from the other parent?

I know 4 parents that had that same problem, but 2 of them are still trying to fix the situation, I've only ever heard it happen to father's though. Some father's make a tenth of what their ex wife made when they divorced and they split the child 50/50 and somehow the father's still end up paying child and spousal support, maybe all the single people have the right idea,lol

I'M SCREAMING 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Brittney Johnson He was hilarious!

@@JudgeVondaB I read the passage at the complete end and I really need to know if the whole show is fake. It completely ruined it for me and I LOVED IT. I thought it was so intriguing and now I’m just wondering if they’re all fake.

@@kurstierashell6423 real cases, paid actors and actresses to protect name and identify of those cases. At the end of the show it says it.

@@LoveAndreana Vonda B is not a judge. So if in fact these were real cases she would be disbarred. Guarantee they are just educational.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

AirmanSoupaman YESSSSSS🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥👏🏾

Haha this one got me. 🤣

That's fuckedup🤦🏿‍♀️🤦🏿‍♀️🤦🏿‍♀️

Welp he never should have pretended loke he didnt have a whole baby out there already. Espically if he wasnt helping her in the begining. Karma always bites you in the ass. Now he have kids on both sides he have to pay up for

My parents owned too many assets for any government assistance But guess what House was up for sheriffs sale multiple times By no means we’re we “rich” Land cost money Cattle. I doubt his income off them is a lot They’ll get old & die. Where’s the assets

Agreed. That’s is wrong. Property shouldn’t matter. People’s retirement shouldn’t either. It’s insane. If you gotta pay out of assets while the kids are younger, I personally would consider that their inheritance. “Go talk to your mom about why you aren’t in my will” 😂

Me too. No marriage ever!

I agree. He shouldn't have to be forced to sell his land , cattle, etc. He should be required to pay CS, yes, but on his actual income and anything that he sells such as the cattle or crops, NOT on land that he pays property tax on and that isn't gaining him an income.

@zholland93 If ya bring a child into the world, its your responsibility, even when your marriage splits... cant just walk out of the door an let your partner care for the child. Its still your child.. its gonna need to eat, drink, do sports.. go to the doctors? you cant deny these, can you? So, given your attitude, I appreciate your decision, its wise and probably best for you and the not born child.

@@tobiasehling6314 it has the literal definition of nothing to do with the children or their care, it has everything to do with the partner having too much control over things like an inherited family farm. Kids can live on the farm, doing all the things you described, without the need for the spouse to come after it. Their needs would be met, and someone didn't have to be a harpy about it. You might have thought you were being cheeky, but you really just showed your callous indifference.

@@zholland93Im pretty sure we can agree to disagree big time ;) If you and your spouse got a child, which lives mainly with either one of you, one of you ve got to pay child support to support the child... hasnt anything to do with spousal support, that money is supposed to benefit the child... as is paying for fkin health insurance... You just cant say "hey, he can visit me on the weekends... feedin horse..." Althought Its at least debatable which amount of his assets can be taken into considerence... Judge assuming 20% roi on his assets seems lil bit exxagerated ... however... payin not a fckin cent for his own child for at least 6 years kills it for me...

09oo on

His income is approx. $50k a year. He inhereted property totalling approx $200k.

She calculated it off of his salary and the cattle only. Not the land

No, but as long as he keeps it...

Damn imagine if he had forty acres and a mule 🤔

Ronny Ziesmer - Boo who - cry me a river. Do you think those cattle are pets? No he will be using them for breeding and selling them for income. How do you figure his child will live in poverty? The mother has been paying for this child for 6 years with nothing from the Dad- Can you say deadbeat? To think this guy works in our social system- what a joke!

@@joytoyouandme4593 wow do you assume much? How was the custody split? Do you assume that women always get custody? How much does she make a month? Do you realize how much money it takes to run a farm let alone a tiny 10 acre one with no resources and a supposed 40k worth of cattle. Do you honestly think that that tiny farm is going to make 40k a year?

Thats already been done multiple times by most major universities. But you are right it needs to be reformed.

That's not really reasonable due to every child/family having different needs. You can't do a generic income and then blanket it across the board. What about those after school activities that cost money that not every child has. What about specific medical conditions that require out of pocket expenses. What about books, supplies, etc for you child outside of the norm, ie, I child that in AP classes. This is why they have a baseline and adjust it accordingly. If you are not the one there on a day to day bases taking care of the needs, then you should be the one to help lighten the load financially speaking. Now I will say, I don't agree with child support that is just high for no reason. Such as the NCP making 100,000 and the CP making 30,000 so they give the CP child support based of the NCP's 70,000 income (offsetting it). I honestly believe it should be based on the needs of the child. But again, if your not the one there on a day to day bases with the child then you should be paying a little more so that the child can do the extra things that they would be able to do if they were in your custody. JS

@@doasisaynotasido7673 needs are rather basic. Shelter, food, clothes school expenses, insurance not mommys 50,000 suv in the driveway to make her payments.

@@rushfan9thcmd Yes those needs on paper or basic, but if my child is in private school and yours go to public school the amount of money that is payed is going to be different. same applies to the rest of the BASIC NEEDS you listed. That my deer was my point. ALSO insurance doesn't always cover everything, what about co-pays and non covered services. What about entertainment for the children, that is a basic need that you do not have listed. Its not as black and white as you tried to make it seem.

@@doasisaynotasido7673 As for "deer" learn to spell. As a single father that spent the last 18 years raising my 3 sons dealing with a deadbeat ex and having to deal with false allegations to police and dcfs and women in my own family trying to help my ex violate court orders, been there done that. The school costs should be spilt evenly as should any other costs including any costs not covered by insurance. Been there done that.

Walter H Thank you for tuning in and commenting. Deemed income sets a reasonable amount of child support based on a person’s assets, even if they are not income producing. Based on his testimony, the cattle were worth $40,000. That’s deemed income (the $40k) and someone can be ordered to pay child support off of that amount.

@@JudgeVondaB Thanks for responding. I understand that. I never questioned if it could or could not be done. The law is the law wether we agree or not. I questioned the logic. His child support was based off of 90k annual income. However even if he did sell the cattle he only has that 90k for THAT year. But every year after that he's paying support based on 90k while only bringing in 50k. Again, it makes no logical sense.

Walter H You’re welcome! Oh ok, I got you. I don’t necessarily agree with everything either. I try to educate people through this show of what exists so people will know what’s to expect when headed into child support Court.

@@JudgeVondaB Right, and the reality is what's to expect is for Men to be screwed. Yea I know women get screwed too but numbers don't lie. 82% of women win child support/custody trials. That's a huge number and I strongly doubt that's a coincidence.

Walter H It’s changing, believe me. I have many male clients who now have custody of their children and the mom is paying child support.

You mean the Texas Legislature. It can be done. It will be done. It’s done.

This is legal extortion you're a nut judge

Horrible answer Ms "Peasant Vonda B".. You are no judge just a person who want some TV time.

@@sannd6022 ,listen to the show. She said she paid for the health insurance for the last 6 years and the guy chimed in where did she get the money, meaning he was paying it other than that they were divorced a little over a year. For the record Texas law states you can only go back 12 months for arrears!

@@JudgeVondaB so why not apply it equally in every case?

Welcome to merica. Where judges, lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians dictate what somebody pays for a kid. One person can work and the other one can sit back and enjoy the kid. Disgusting what that judge did. And her terrible smirk

Joseph Morabito so the mother paying for and caring for a child for 16 years and begging for dads help for the last 2 is wrong? Really

Joseph Morabito so true

Nope, she based it off the posdibl6income for the cows. She knew better than to play with the land! If he wasn't going to stay in the business then sell the cows outright and go back to court to modify support the following year. By law you can take the mother back when you have a change in circumstance! She at this point would have to reduce support because he got rid of the income producing cows! The mother git one year at 1200 a month and now will probably get less than half after she reruns those numbers!

@@briw8562 ,it is sad but it was one year not two!

He got lucky

I think legally she can only order back pay for up to 4 years (in TX)

Right? All of these folks on here complaining about the unfair judgment seemed to have forgotten he left the woman for another and then paid NOTHING in child support for 6 years! He got off lucky. Even if she only went back the 4 years she is able to, he got off lucky.

It is pretty easy when you tell them exactly what to say and you know it ahead of time to make yourself look good

She doesnt miss a beat 😂 and he was so rude. I would not be able to hold my temper.

Thank you love!!😎💪🏽

if you really did this in court acted this way you would be disbarred because its unprofessional and unbecoming of a judge

@@jackpumkinhead9583 boy bye.

Heather Bergstad - So what do you think he is doing with the cattle? Their not pets, he is going to use them for breeding and income-

Texas law so don't blame the judge she is following the law in Texas

yo-yo Mary I get but this is dangerous. The number one recruitment tool for Isis and Other Islamic extremist groups is America’s Family Court. If you are Military and deployed overseas and your wife cheats on you depending on the State you are responsible for another mans child.

We will get it one way or another.

You have the right 2b not for long things may change. It can be argued that family court decision to go with the mother is considered sexist

My necessarily, a couple of my friends did cheer and that costs $5000 out of pocket just for the uniforms, and soccer at my school cost something like $1000

@@kierstanbrutus8210 well in court sports is considered a luxury so she'd be shit out of luck on that!

In some states if a MAN mentors a child and spends a huge amount of time with the child, and never having a relationship with the mother at any level..... That dizzy EVIL BITCH can file for CHILD SUPPORT .....CHILD SUPPORT is a God Damn scam and this Satanic Family Court system knows this. As these Judges also get there Indirect CUT $$$ too....period

Thank you!

Ha!

@@JudgeVondaB You yourself know this business is corrupt and damages peoples lives. Why do you do this?

These are lessons for many to manage there lives better because decisions have consequences.

@@opheliafua8102 Apparently it's true only for men. Women can make a bad reproductive choice but still get child support and live off it.

I agree. Thats family asset. And his parents passed away. Like girl how would you like it if your mom gave you a home that’s sentimental and someone forced you to sell it? Cant you sue for emotional distraught?

@@bbwaifuwu Yeah and the big thing for me is that those assets can be used to better his living situation as well as his child's if he doesn't sell them. Not to mention that she's setting the regular child support amount based on forcing him to sell all the cattle for a one time injection of funds instead of a steady income ruining the money making potential of the asset while putting him on the hook to keep it up without that asset; its asinine. It also means he can't pass on a fully functional farm to his son for graduation like he'd planned basically allowing the mother to liquidate the asset out from under her son for her own benefit.