تیمور صاحب آپ اپنے لئے دعا کیا کریں کہ آپ کا انجام عاصمہ جہانگیر کے ساتھ ھو ھم دعا کرتے ہیں کہ اللہ ھمارا انجام مولانا مودودی رح کے ساتھ فرمائے

📌21 November 1945 M.A Jinnah said in Frontier Muslim League Confrence : "We have to fight at double edged battle, one against the Hindu congess and the British imperialist, The Muslim demand Pakistan where they could rule according to their own code of life and according to their own cultural growth, traditions and Islamic law's" The key word is "Muslim" "rule" and "Islamic laws"

Molana was a greatest person

The fact that there is disagreement, 75 years later, about why Pakistan was created, shows where it is headed 😢

The reason why Pakistan was created is to protect the wealth of rich Muslims mostly those Muslims were either Gujurati or Sayyed origins. Sayyeds or Persians still hold the majority Land in Pakistan 🇵🇰 while Gujuratis are the big business tycoons. That was the reason for the creation of Pakistan.

Two things, first I don't think Maududi was saying that ideology of Pakistan had not any connection with Islamic theocracy, I think he pronounced that the people establishing it on the popular level are not honest and their claim is superficial. I think he was right saying that League leaders didn't express the intention to create an Islamic country in clear cut words but used as a mere slogan to gain sympathies of politically immature public. Second, I think this debate about whether Pakistan was Islamic or not is pretty useless. Imagine you wake up in a place and are told that the people before you didn't want it to be a good place. Even though, you would have the urge to make it a good place. I think when the majority is Muslim and wants Sharia law as the constitution, it is of no use that the founding father was even Muslim or even an atheist!

I would not be able to decide on the matter unless I heard from both sides but one thing I know is maulana modudi understood Quran, Islamic Law, and politics from the Quran and Sunnah far better than most of the scholars of his time till today. (Waiting for the next episode keenly).

I haven't read molana moddodi, but i think he was right all along.

Wow! Molana was really harsh. How ironic that not only he accepted Pakistan's formation but his political party took part in democracy. Now his party is considered the most democratic party of Pakistan.

Dono cheezain Theek Hain Apny Hisaab se, Muslim league ny Public ko Bewakoof banaya islaam ke name par, to public to yehi smjhy gi Islamic state bnana maqsad tha, dosri tarf Agar aik expert ki nazar se dekha jaye jaisy molana moududi ny dekha to Muslim league sirf mufaad parasat jamat thi or ye batt sabat bhi hoi. Tab b awam aisy e Bewakoof bani thi Islam ke name par aj bhi ban rahi.

Thanks for your v.good real analyses.

Dr. Israr asked: if you wanted secularism, then why partition from India? Because India chose secularism, and the Muslims who chose the same refused to migrate to Pakistan, i.e. the only people migrating were those who did not want secularism. If both countries are secular, the partition is pointless.

What difference does it make now. Pakistan is reality. Just run it whichever way you want with civilised relationship with your neighbors.

🌟 Agar secular mulk hi chahiye tha toh Partition kyu hua? 🤦🏻‍♂️ I'm a Leftist myself but I'm sorry this is sheer cope by liberals and leftists in implying Pakistan was imagined as a secular state and not an Islamic one. QeA Jinnah has only one speech talking about Secularism compared to 100s where he talks about an Islamic State and how Muslims are a different Nation. Historical Revisionism by Ayesha Jalal is unfortunate.

Maududi has great polemical writing skills

I think that even if the Molana considered League's leaders to be Muslims only by name, it was evident that Pakistan's constitution would be Islamic in nature.

Bhot aala sir, esi videos bnaty rhen

In which book maudoodi said this kindly update that

Maududi was a great man and his party jamat e islami in pakistan is real democratic party

📍On Feb 19, 1948, in a broadcast Jinnah proclaimed: "Make no mistake, Pakistan is not a theocracy, or anything like it. " Jinnah ki is baat se hum kya muraad lein? 📍On August 11 1947, he said You are free, you are free to go to ur temples, u r free to go to mosques or to any other place of worship in the state of Pakistan. ye secularism ni hai?.... what is secular state: State which guarantees religious freedom for every citizen.. Then where is لیکون الدین کلہ للہ۔۔ Just humble qs ...if u can answer 🙂

Might be a good idea to date the works you quoted because Mr. Maududi was initially against the creation of Pakistan and Muslim League, but later reneged on his stance. It appears you quoted his older works while ignoring his later, revised stance. It also appears you have an ulterior agenda against Islam in Pakistan; in other videos, you misquoted Maududi and Dr. Israr so blatantly that one is left wondering how you even became a professor in the first place.

Excellent video, very informative. I was informed in this regard but i dod not have direct quotes as you have provided in this video. Every member of Jamyat should read these writings of Moududi and understand that they are (probably) mistaken about Pakistan.

I read the book (Mawjoda Siasi Kashmakash awar Muslam) around twenty years ago and I knew how Maudodi staunchly opposed the creation of Pakistan just because he did not agree with the idea of Muslim or Islamic nationalism. But if we look into the issue from a different perspective we will be able to see that It was not because of Islamic teaching rather his personal understanding of Islam which he believed in. Obviously he found the whole religious justification for a separate state irreconcilable for what he stood for. He was not alone in his condemnation and mocking of the Muslim League leadership. Jamiat Ulema Hind, which included towering scholars and learned theologists in its files and ranks, also did not buy the notion of Islamic or Muslim nation. Ahrar too opposed the AIML. So because of all such religious opposition do we still believe that Pakistan was created for the sole purpose of enforcing Sharia or creating a secular state for Muslims of the subcontinent.. Mr. Jinnah never ever hinted that Pakistan would be a secular state but at the same time also did not promise a Sharia system. If we claim that he stood for a secular state then it would hit the root of the very concept of the state. Because the very genesis of the country was based on two nations (Muslim Nation and the rest as separate nation) theory. If it was not secular then was it a theocratic state. If it was theocratic then why all these religious scholars and best theologists opposed it? Why did none of the AIML leadership have any authority on theology? I have my own views. I believe It was not the AIML who strived and then succeeded in achieving a separate state of Pakistan. In fact it was the mix of few historical incidents, needs, understanding, co-incidents and the future needs of the dying/rising of colonial power. Indian National Congress nonetheless; boasted of secularism and claim of representing the Indian masses irrespective of their color and creed but few important leaders in their ranks were infected with communal pest. Besides the INC also committed political blunders and when they were needed to accommodate, they shun their opponents. The drying British colonialists and the rising American Imperialists need to have a piece of land to continue the great game against its historical rival - Soviet Union. Finally Muslims were numerically in majority where the present Pakistan was established. We had no problem and even there was no chance for the non Muslim to have won elections and ruled us in near future. Unfortunately those Muslims who feared the Hindu dominance and loss of their Muslim identity once the British departed India and democracy set in, were left to face the brunt of communal hatred. As far as the massacre of around half a million Hindu, Sikh and Muslims during pre and post partition is concerned, that was not for the sake of their struggle for freedom. Pathetically the British sown the seeds of communalism, hatred and division on the basis of faith around a hundred years ago but harvested by Indians with the blood and tears. None of these Sikh, Muslim, Hindu etc died in the path of fighting for freedom but they were killed by the opposite faith believers. Sadly enough the leadership of AIML, Congress and Sikh were too to be blamed for their apathy, selfishness and at times political expediency .

@taimoor_urdu did you discussed this topic with engineer mirza?

I think the most accepted and Muslim scholar of that the was Moulana Abdul kalam Azad.who predicted was 100% proved and will be proved right.

Book name please

Molana was not perfect neither are we. Change of opinion is normal in intellectuals. But as a nation are far away from the intellect and like past narratives rather than supporting the current one. Which party was in favour of Pakistan? ANP? JUI-H? Communist?? But people only talk about JI because they find nothing else to defame them. Although Professor Taimur is a gem, and I liked this video because he is a scholar and it is a scholarly discussion, I am feeling strange about how people are using this video for political purposes.

اگر جناح ایک سیکولر ریاست بنانا چاہتے تھے تو پھر قرارداد مقاصد کیوں کیوں منظور کی گئی ڈاکٹر تمور صاحب میرا یہ اپ سے سوال ہے اگر مسلم لیگ اتنی سیکولر تھی تو انہوں نے قرارداد مقاصد کیوں منظور کی۔

I think it's crucial to distinguish the political narrative of a political party from the personal/ private actions and beliefs of its leaders/organizers. Political persona/image of the party should be set apart from the private individual. The political narrative is influenced by many factors, among which, the popular sentiment of the community whose support the political party aims to garner is the most significant one. Thus, the secular lifestyles of the leaders of Muslim League did not hold them back from using religion as a tool for popular appeal. They effectively used the religio-nationalist rhetoric as a means to a political end. One such piece of rhetoric will suffice to support this claim: In his speech at the Frontier Muslim League Conference on November 21, 1945, MA Jinnah said: “We have to fight a double edged battle, one against the Hindu Congress and the British Imperialists, both of them being capitalists. The Muslims demand Pakistan where they could rule according to their own code of life and according to their own cultural growth, traditions and Islamic laws.” The key words are "Muslims", "rule", and "Islamic Law".

تیمور صاحب تو کیا پاکستان کا مقصد ایک سیکولر کمیونسٹ ریاست بنانا تھا؟

Did you intensionally left the name of Dr. Istiyaq Ahmed out, while mentioning Dr. Ayesha Jalal? He has written a book debunkink Dr. Jalal's theory with compelling references. He also mentions with references about the written communication between British higher-ups of that time that subcontinent was divided to prevent a possible super power of the future. He says that Jinnah was just a politician who was used for this purpose, he was not a true leader.

Before independence it was Muslim League who took the lead in uniting the Muslims of sub continent for a just cause, whereas, leadership of Jammat-e-Islami was as pathetic and lousy as it is now- meaning they were never able to fight for a cause. Infact due to the lack of funding they even go against creation of Pakistan, and Maududi was ethical enough not to oppose like today's vulgar politicians infact he was as pathetic and lousy as his other members of the party. At least he is right on one thing, Pakistan is definitely a Miracle of Allah, even if Maududi is so idealogical then he should had that much of shame of not migrating to Pakistan. Jihad (Hand, words or by heart) is required at all times under some single leadership to overcome the corruption in a society. Wal Khat Hussaini

It would have been more interesting if the title had name like ' A teaser for jamatis '. ( Based on the sarcastic and rehtorical way you are speaking to them in the end ).😅😅 Waiting for the episode 2 in which you should describe how they substantiate against this and what's your answer then.

Sir book name or refrence batya karain

Thank you so much Sir 😢

Love him or Hate him, Maududi was Honest unlike Jinnah and Liaquat Ali Khan.

Sar G muj likina nei atia viruna ma ap ka sat pori bais kirta visa ap ke video muj bhot pisen aye good sar G full Bacha khani pikar da

Brilliant analysis and well researched.

آپ نے تو جماعت اسلامی سے بہت ہی مشکل سوالات پوچھ لئے ہیں۔ ❤️

How can one build argument on the basis of one man? There were many ulemas in favour of the establishment of Pakistan including Shabeer Ahmad Usmani, Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi, Pir of Golra etc. Your all questions were answered in 1949's objective resolution

in 1946,there was slogan in Pakistan 'Pakistan ka matlab kya La ilah il Allah,After 2014 there is slogan in India Hindustan ka matlab kya Jai shri Ram

اس وقت پاکستان کے قیام کا مقصد ایک الگ ریاست کا تھا جس کو اسلام کا نام دیا گیا لیکن جب یہ ایک الگ ریاست بن گئی تو اس کی اولین ترجیح یہ ہے کہ اس میں اسلامی نظام حکومت نافذ کیا جائے۔ جس کی پہلی اینٹ ملانا مودودی نے مسلہ قادنیت لکھ کر کیا اور اس کے بعد مولانا نے قرارداد مقاصد میں بھی اہم کردار ادا کیا

Jamooriat par molana ke old views bta raye ap. Update karain khud ko. Molana jamooriat ke haami thy lekin Allah ki Itaa'at main rehty howy, Jb "Hakmiat Allah ki " ye law bana to onho ny kaha tha ap riasat ny Qalma parh lia hai

Quo vadis Comrade Taimur Rahman? It's absolutely not mandatory to accept one or other of the suggested options, both of these could be misleading. Surprisingly you have missed to quote a third option, which has been suggested by Dr. Ishtiaq Ahmed and which seems to be the most important and contemporary one. Is it only a matter of coincidence?

Very right.The law maker at the time of Independence was a HINDU and the foreign minister was AHMADI.This clearly indicates the fact that Pakistan was originally a secular nation as this involvement of other religions in big authorities is unacceptable in Islam

Agr sahih maini mai islami riasat k asool apna liye jayen to kisi bhi mazhab, zuban aur nasl sy taaluq rkhny walon k haqooq ghazab nhe hon gy.....hmara almia ye hai k hum ny Islam ko samjha he nhe.

Sir book reference please

Marx would never misquote Martin Luther. Intellectual honesty is rare in Pakistan

Molana moududi theek thy...💔

Great Mawlana saab, you were way ahead of your time.

Knowledge is power and ignorance is not a bliss. Ignorants are found in all forms and colours: with beards, without beards, laal, Sabaz… Read history without agenda and prejudice, then you will discover the truth, otherwise stories are fabricated to promote one agenda or another. Lies have many colours, truth has just one. In this case the truth is in the words of great Jinnah, not taken from one speech but all what he said before and after partition, and the words of those who advised him and stood with him against Maududis, Muftis, father of Fazlur Rahman, Madnis, Azads … Truth is difficult to find in the sea of lies, but the truth is there for those who have no agenda and intellect that is drawn to truth.

Chad maududi bashed everyone else but always supported military takeovers, supported Zia in the execution of Zulifiqar Ali Bhutto, JUI was formed by the backing of the establishment after partition, and supported the Islamization program of Zia Ul Haq. One can see clear dualism in his personality. What kind of political Islam supports the actions of a tyrant (military coup), which are directly against the fundamental rights of the citizens. Undoubtedly, maududi had a firm grip on Islamic principles but he always backed authoritarianism politically, which is sad. I was an ardent supporter of Maududi and read a lot about his views. Alas! I read too much and know his blunders.

Minitey of education ko bhi pharhaye ta k syllabus darust kia ja ske...

Majority of the (myopic) moolahs opposed the establishment of Pakistan but quickly hijacked Pakistan soon after Jinnah had made it

😭😭😭... Agar Quaid RA aaaj zinda hotay to bohot pachtaaatay k hy ye kiaaa hogiaaa may to Pakistaaan bananaaa chahta tha magar ye to chorooon dakowooon qatelooon aor zamir faroshooon kaliye falaaahy markaz ban giaaa ??? Molana Ubaid Ullaaah Sindhy RA 1939 may 25 saaal ky jala watny k bad wapas aaaye to bohot khafa rahnay lagay, Baity na kahaaa ab to Pakistaaan bun raha hay angraiz ja raha hay ab kia pareshaaany hay to aaap nay jawaaab dia k jin ko chorh kar ja rahay to onkay kartooot daikhkar awaaam yahy kahaingay k insay to angraiz acha thaaa ??? Isliye barai meherbaaany Modooody saaab par zyada noqta cheny karnaiky bilkol zarorat nahy ???

Allama Iqbal's critique of democracy [Bang e Dra -196]: _Utha ke phenk do bahir gali mein,_ _Nayi tezheeb ke ande hain gande._ _Election, memberi, council, sadarat,_ _Banaye khoob azaadi ne phande._ _Mian najjar bhi cheele gaye saath,_ _Nihayat tez hain Europe ke rande._

More power to u❤

بہترین👍

It is such a sad thing that our history which doesn't spans over thougsands of years but still we can't seem to get historc clearity its really someting which is bothersam ...

Can any Pakistanis tell us what version of Quran is correct. Out of 30 or so different Qurans?

Maududi and Socrates both hated democracy difference is Maududi was muslim and Socrates was atheist.

Ut Maududi came to Pakistan after its inception and joined politics. Why?

There can be a third opinion as well : that is It's a good discussion whether Muslim league leaders internally want Pakistan to be an Islamic state or otherwise but this is vividly clear that their mandate on which Indian-Muslims support them was completely of the Islamic state. Proofs: 1> Khilafat Movement 2> Quaid sayings i.e.: "Quran will be our constitution". 3> The whole narrative, though & poetry of Iqbal. 4> The demand for Islamic implementation on the state level after independence which led to Objective Resolution and many other things. There is so much more that can be said on this topic, but I leave it for some other day. Thanks

ڈاکٹر تیمور صاحب! کیا ہی اچھا ہوتا کہ آپ مودودی صاحب کی کتب/تحریر سے مذکورہ تمام مواد جن کا آپ نے ذکر کیا ، دکھایا جاتا۔ جس کتاب سے آپ یہ مواد لے رہے ہیں وہ مودودی صاحب کی کتب یا ان کے شائع کردہ کسی رسالے سے ماخوذ نہیں ہیں۔ خود مودودی صاحب کی کتب / رسالے کا تحریری عکس دکھائے بغیر تحقیق یا حوالہ مکمل ن ہیں ہوگا۔

thought provoking

👍👍

Sir! I am again commenting to remind you that you are going wrong again. I am looking often dumbfounded by the fact that a political scientist has to consult a prejudiced source to know about a person's views instead of reading his works firsthand. I can't think of any other reason except that you are prejudiced against Maududi to an extent that you find sources misquoting him. In your previous videos, I mentioned the books too which must be consulted in this regard but you are not ready to shun your intellectual dishonesty and lethargy. This video started with a grand claim but ultimately shrunk pathetically. Propaganda. Yet another propaganda piece.

Why you not talking about bacha khan He was also against Pakistan

Well analyize

No reference of any book of syyed Abu aala modudi

If Democracy was so wrong why Mododi made Jamat e Islami ?

مولانا کی بات ٹھیک ہے

I have great respect for you and agree with you on some things but u started your video by saying some people believes that Pakistan was created for Islam and some says it was for secular reasons. You said that you'll give both sides and will not agree on one thing but u created whole video on quoting Maududi that Pakistan was not meant for Islam, Then where is that point of view which negates the point that Pakistan is created for secularism? Maulana did great work for Islam but if you take his words last words for everything my question to you is that what about other things which Maulana says will you also take them as last and right words?

One should know and ask about the intentions of 'Pakistan Movement' and of 'the creation of Pakistan' from the people and the founders (Muhammad Ali Jinnah and Allama Iqbal) of Pakistan and not from the third party who were not, as it is known, in favour or movement of Pakistan. What did Muhammad Ali Jinnah say about the intentions behind the creation of Pakistan. ?

❤❤❤

One thing that Jinnah was not pro Islamic but a true democrat and a statesman is very true.

Molana moududi was right that democracy was not ideal for Islam. But Mr. Jinnah had no choice as it was not an easy task to get a separate Muslim welfare state in those circumstances. We can realize the importance of Pakistan for Muslims by looking at the pitiable situation of Muslims in India especially in Kashmir.

South asians ko bass kisi na kisi k mureed/follower/ghulam banney ki itni gandi or shadeed bimari hy k . .. Koi khanay peenay ki maujaan marney ki baat kro.sochnay ka time nai awam k pass🤣

Molana Maududi RA is greatest the scholar of our time

Started going through your videos for historical clarity, but they contain the same biasness and just one sided tendencies to promote liberalism. What's the point of the channel if this is only about shifting views towards "your" idealogy more than "clarification" of ideologies that was needed.

مولانا مودودی ایک بہترین مبلغ تھے. آپ ماشاءاللہ سےتاریخ پر بھی نظر رکھتے ہیں. آپ کو یہ بھی بتانا چاہیے تھا کہ کس ماحول اور کیسے دور میں مولانا نے کیا بات کی. جس قسم کا دور تھا اور جیسے جیسے تبدیل ہو رہا تھا وقت اور حالات کے مطابق تجزیہ دیا جانا تھا. اور وہ مولانا نے دیا. آپ کا مسئلہ مولانا نہیں اسلام ہے. کم از کم مجھے تو ایسا ہی لگا ان سب باتوں سے جو آپ نے اس ویڈیو میں کیں

According to me the answer is very very simple........the ultimate goal of getting a separate land from India was to apply totally Islamic laws.....if during separation they wanted to make a circular state then they were faulted...It doesn't matter what were qaid e Azam's intentions relating secularism and Islam because he was not a prophet and we have to follow our prophet in this matter.....

The Muslim League already lost its credibility when it accepted the Cabinet Mission Plan of 1946. The continued rejection of every proposal tabled by the Congress for funds approval in front of the finance minister, Liaquat Ali Khan, finally convinced Vallabhai Patel and Nehru who then convinced Gandhi to get rid of The League by giving them, in the words of Jinnah, a 'Moth-Eaten' state. Quoting K.K. Aziz from his book 'The Murder of the History', "Pakistan was created by the Hindus. Had the Hindu leaders shown greater wisdom, more flexibility, less ignorance, the Muslim League would not have insisted on a partition of India."

💯 % True about the Muslim leagie leaders and nazria e islam. However, if given a chance to the jamiet islami like parties, the situation would be as bad as now.

ڈاکٹر صاحب آپ ہمارے لئے نہایت قابل احترام ہیں لیکن مولانا سید ابو اعلی مودودی مسلمانوں کے اقبال کے سب سے بڑے مفکر تھے، اچھا ہوتا اگر آپ پہلے ان کی تبحر علمی اور انکے علمی کارناموں پر روشنی ڈالتے اس کے بعد ان کے نظریات پر نقد کرتے تو سننے والے ان سے اختلاف تو رکھتے مگر ان کے علمی کام سے بھی آگاہ ہو جاتے

Who is the author of your reference book ? I can't read his name it's Chaudhary Habib or what's the name of author it's blurry in the video. Mr Jinnah was a secular Muslim no doubt in it his personal life style is witness of it. As far as his political views I think it was mixture of secularism and Islamic teachings as he had never explained clearly in his speech es that what exact system would be of Pakistan nor they have prepared any document or constitution as Indian leadership was clear what will be the system of India or it can be a political move so keep people in disguise because if clearly he will say a secular state then what's the reason for partition and two nation theory which already congress Muslim and deoband leaders were saying so he had used and given the full Islamic touch to Tehreek Pakistan as he was a great politician of his time. Molana Muduade was critic of Mr Jinnah as you explained in the end of your video that Jinnah was not clearly explaining how they will run the country sometime they say as per Islamic teachings but they don't show or prepare any constitution as per Islamic laws. On western democracy Molana Muduade said it's against islam because in western democracy any law can be made as per will of people but Islamic laws can't be change as per will of people that's why he is against western democracy. As far selection of government is concern according to voting system he is always in favor of it and JI has always taken part in elections. He is also not like typical Madarsa molana he has changed his views also as per the present situation of world if anything is not colliding with Islamic principles he is accepting it if it was not done in past by Muslims.

if socialism is not adopted, it is against the principle of Islam.See the gap between HAVES and Haves Not in Pakistan and compare per capita GDP OF Pakistan ,India and Bangladesh

Sir why did then Maududi come to Pakistan and participate in democratic system? Even today his party is participating in the democratic system.

He was part of the parliament which was jumhuriyat

I can smell a hatred in ur hearts for those who demand Pakistan to be islamic republic of Pakistan.😊

جو بھی بننا ہے بس کچھ بن جائے پاکستان ہماری بلا سے سیکولر بنے یا اسلامی۔ اسلامی سے مراد اگر ملائیت ہے تو ہماری توبہ ہمیں نہیں چاہیے انکا اسلام

Look the question here is pretty simple, if Jinnah wanted to make an absolutely secular state, there was no need for pakistan then.

Tehalka khaiz, comrade sir

المضتصر۔:: پاکستان کا مسلہ کیا؟۔ لا الہ اللہ ۔۔😂😂😂

you sound like Chahat Fateh Ali khan in between especially listen to the way he pronounces Balkey"

Yet another failed attempt to malign Maududi, just showing your incompetence or precisely academic dishonesty to explain the point of view of Maulana Maududi on Islamic state, and Pakistan. At least person should know the history of some party that's unfortunately manifested even in comment section...

this was so good....he gave jamaatis a hiding!

Brother! I think you misunderstood his narrations . He never said that Pakistan is MEANT to be a secular state rather he commented that it would LED to a secular state with the conduct of affairs Muslims had at that time. ( And we can see it clearly today) It might be an aspiration for them but their conduct was not as per the aspirations. And this is nothing different from the spirit of the common man in the subcontinent. I.e we want to tag with Islam but our conduct of affairs is exactly opposite to what we aspire as ummah. This is what he emphasized in the fundamental literature of tehreek as well: ہر فرد کو اپنی ذات میں موجود نفاق ، غیر اسلامی طرز فکر و عمل کو پہچاننے اور دور کرنے کی فکر کرنی چاہیے ۔ For reference you may read the دستور تحریک اسلامی (ہماری دعوت کیا ہے) But at the same time as you quoted his words " through un-islamic ways if Islam comes in true spirit it would be no less than a Miracle." Which means it's highly unlikely that with the wishful thinking Muslims have in general along with the opposing conduct of affairs Islam could ever re-emerge as the glorious 1st century of Islam.

Moreover Maududi didn't have technical skills and contemporary political know how. Mr Taimur you are just dragging and forcing an unnecessary narrative here. Cherry picked something that justifies your Marxist position subtly.

پھر مولانا مودودی کو قائد اعظم نے قیام پاکستان کے بعد ریڈیو پاکستان پر کیوں لیکچر دینے کا بولا گیا تھا؟