I'm calling BS on any IQ test that assumes knowledge of any kind not provided in the test itself. Literacy or even knowing letters from the latin alphabet shouldn't be a prerequisite for the test. These tests are meant to solvable by kids in Africa who only know Zulu.

It's a hard knock life

its okay paul, he is smarter than all of us.

Literally a slice of bread is smarter than me

It has officially been proven that it took him 2 tests to satisfy him that he's a 138 still. Even if he got a 141, his og test was below genius

@@isaaclupie7078 nahh the first test was inaccurate, thats why the title is “taking a more accurate test…”

It was proven way before that, just watch a few of his hearthstone videos from the past

Toast should take an actual genuine IQ test and upload it on his main channel

@@armaanb.6566 actual genuine iq tests aren't something you can upload on a youtube channel. lol

@@JohnDoe-nm5le actual genuine iq tests dont exist. taking iq tests is a skill that you can practise and yes that includes mensas shitty tests. iq scores while as an idea make sense are in reality highly inaccurate. determining a persons 'real' IQ would take a lot of time and effort since stuff like education will always be a way too big factor.

@@hunzukunz do you think all iq tests are just puzzles like in the video? there are certain things that iq test measure that cannot be learned like working memory, which i believe has a pretty high correlation with iq. digit span, visual memory, etc. are things that you can use to test for iq when tested together with things like problem solving, processing speed, and whatever else. working memory is something that you cannot improve. furthermore, there are plenty of studies that demonstrate that people with high iqs also have better processes that occur in their brain. i.e they have greater neurite density, lower dendrite connectivity due to higher efficiency of cell communication, corticol thickness, glucose uptake, etc. etc. of things i don't remember but researchers are aware of. so, would i be more likely to believe some random dumbass on the internet making a claim that these things aren't real just because their ego won't allow it, or would i listen to neuroscientists who study the brain for a living and have published a lot of research about the relationship between intelligence, iq, and the structure of the brain?

hey you’re that cool clip channel of toast

Me fighting over my second tought

Yess Toast is so smart... He didn't read chat or anything... haha

Do u have the link for this test ?

Really ? Because I managed to get 140 above after taking it 3 times

@@saysamnang9851 after 3 tries?? if you haven't maxed out the test after 3 tries, idk what you're doing

@@quarepercutisproximum9582 Pretty sure it's very randomized, there are a lot more questions that don't actually appear on the test until you take another one

Yeh it’s the average is weighed in this case, so the answer is 40%, right?

@@princess_vanellope4560 I thought it was 25% but I wasn't paying attention, so I am not surprised if you were right.

@@princess_vanellope4560 No. The average for 1992 is the left bar in the right graph, and if you look at the pie chart for 1992, the sections that are above that 700 acres make up about 25% of the chart. You’re definitely right about the data being skewed towards smaller farms. You just underestimated how skewed it was

Agreed

its the third one 😂 u just have to repat the top left figures

bruh it isssss omg

lol yeah he was like sodoko! then there is the fucking things being repeated over and over LOL

Was looking for this comment! Agreed-vertical lined tiles also repeat in both row and column, thus breaking any possible sudoku. Live chat was hyping option 2 :/

I hate to say it, but he has the same IQ as the leader who initiated WWII

@@pyropotassium4076 so? that doesnt mean they are similar

@@frost9602 wdym? Their IQs are the same. They are similar in that regard. I know what you mean though, definitely not.

Probably you were smart for a 13 year old but for a 15 year old you're just above average, and you should take IQ test results with a deviation of 15 Especially online ones the one he gave is totally not accurate and easy

EQ is pseudoscience

Social IQ isn't a thing. It's more a reflection of your personality/mental health. I get what you are saying though. I guess you could try to quantify a social score from an Among Us experiment. That would be fun at the very least.

Yeah yeah keep rationalizing it to yourself

if you do IQ tests back to back your IQ score will become less and less accurate

the norway one is much more accurate than this crap lol

hot take

​@@philj8205 Michael Reeves once said that studying at school made him suck at programming. People need to specialize.

This just sounds like a problem with that test being difficult to design and administer, not that the results are necessarily meaningless for sighted people.

Weird conclusion to make that is riddled in logical fallacy. Just because it isn't accurate for a select group of people doesn't take away the validity or usefulness of the test. Just... don't administer it to those people.

Literally ur the best clip channel

It does actually

It doesn’t

Online iq tests aren’t really accurate I tried the same website a while back and I got an iq of 180. In reality my actual iq is 176

Did you watch the video?