Hi Taylor Jackson love your video so please can you suggest me one or two lens for all day shoot for Fujifilm x mount camera

​@@paolenmangkhongsai2172 ~~~~

I sold both a Sigma 24 70 2.8 DG DN, and Tamron's then only about a year old 70-180 2.8, to get the 35-150 2-2.8 a month from release (since then being backordered in almost every country and online shop). It's a large, heavy lens (a bit smaller and lighter than a standard 70-200 2.8), but for what is does (replacing a 35mm 1.8, a 50mm, 85mm, 105mm, 135mm, and everything in-between and up to 150mm) and the sharpness, very low CA, and great AF performance it has, it's all worth it. Tamron, however, markets it as a "travel lens", but it certainly highly appeals wedding & event photographers, as well as some portait photographers (that prefer versatility, and want to have f/1.4 and f/1.2, or that stick to one or two focal lenghts). And if 35mm is not enough, you can have another body with either a small and light Tamron 20-40mm 2.8, or 17-28 2.8, or Sigma 16-28 2.8, or Sony 16-35 f4 PZ. Or even an APS-C body with the ultra-sharp and light Tamron 11-20mm 2.8 (about 16.5-30mm f/4.2 equiv. on full frame). Or, of course, a 14-24mm f/2.8, or the superb, very expensive, quite light, Sony 12-24mm f/2.8 GM. Regarding the switch to Sony, there are a (whole) lot of reasons to switch. The first enormous success was the Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 RXD, it made a lot of people to switch to using the Sony a7 III. Today, on the 24-70/28-70/75 f/2.8 range, there are no less than 7 native lenses (2 Sony, 2 Tamron, 2 Sigma, 1 Samyang) each with their own advantages and disadvantages. Compare that to 2 on L-mount (1 Panasonic, 1 Sigma), 1 on Canon RF, 2 on Nikon Z (24-70 + rebadged Tamron 28-75 G1). The 35-150 2-2.8 is not just a unique lens that has a great build quality and great image quality, but it's also extremely versatile and useful for a lot of real-life photo applications and genres.

I've been using it on both my Sony and Nikon bodies. The Megadap ETZ21 works really, really well with this lens. Currently playing with the 20-40 as a complement. So far so happy.

This lens is part of the reason why I switched back to Sony. I do have sigma’s 24 and 85 1.4 though for if I need something wider or something brighter

The biggest reason for astrophotographers is Sony 20mm G, for wildlife 200-600 G, for prime shooters 35 GM is arguably THE best lens ever on any mount, followed by 24 and 50mm GM's. This Tamron would have been a much bigger success than what it already is if Sony had not released the GM II 70-200, that lens is crazy light, with OSS and renders beautifully and is compatible with teleconverters. GM II is just a dream lens. I wish Tamron went with 28-135 or 24-105 (my fav lens is 24-105 G) instead of 35-150. This lens still warrants carrying a 16-35 GM or PZ.

Just got mine. Heavy but fun to shoot with

Silly mistake pal - you cant compare a beautiful 1.4 look with a random everything in focus do it all zoom lens

@Mich McGowen How is the lens random? And with f2.2 at 50mm you are far from everything is in focus, least to say at 150mm f2.8.

@@michmcgowen619 Bad take

I deliver everything in colour as well. They’re more than good enough in colour, I just prefer the back and whites

so you send two folder? B&W and Color to the client? And in the b&w just some photo or you love to export all the wedding too in b&w? Thanks for the response 💪 love your content @@TaylorJacksonPhoto

I usually make them more matte feeling with my preset. I like the tamron colours personally out of the lens tho

@@TaylorJacksonPhoto Ah, ok. Thanks for responding. Keep up the good work!

Then no need to get a f2-2.8 lens :)

Rolling shutter performance isn’t great with electronic. I also don’t trust it in artificial lighting

Yah it would be interesting to see an Apsc equivalent of this. Might end up being huge though

the 18-120 f4 is the closest match. if they made it a 2.8, it'd probably be bigger than 100-400.

If you bought that preset collection in the past 3 years, I just keep updating the collection with the new additions

I used to be a member but canceled my subscription last year due to switching photography genres (still enjoy these videos). When I log on to your website to pickup your summer 2022 collection, it prompts me to purchase the full collection. Am I doing something wrong in this case? Thank you for your reply!

lmao.. imaging the size of a lens like this with a 1.2 aperture.. and the PRICE TAG!! geezz lol

@@Meth0z Hence sticking with GM primes mate, I shoot some REALLY dark venues 👍🏻

It really is

I just ordered one that was in stock at a store in Canada. Maybe got lucky?

I even use it as a rolling pin for cooking

They’ve already ported one lens over. Nikon would gain market percentage by allowing it to happen.

​@@TaylorJacksonPhotowell well well

Depends on preset. TI should always be a bit faded

@@TaylorJacksonPhoto the preset is T1 right? From the summer 2022 pack? If so, then maybe I downloaded it wrong? On the tone curve, it’s a slight check mark shape but the blacks are at zero and so are the whites. Not sure if I did something wrong?

@@Rockinkid59 weird that should be the right one. Try the other packs perhaps, I used to have them a lot more faded. I don’t usually do anything manually other than exposure

@@TaylorJacksonPhoto yeah I checked the other packs and they all are pretty faded with some exceptions. Which seems right. But I noticed this one in the video seems really out of camera-esque with the fading but when I tried it, it didn’t look close at all so I was confused. I just recently bought all the packs too haha so I’m not sure if maybe my laptop just bugged out

@@TaylorJacksonPhoto yea I just shut everything down and deleted the preset and added it again and it’s the same thing

That’s very weird. They would be exact same. I downloaded them when i did a new computer install a few weeks ago. Wonder what it could be

I like the separation from ungelled

Yah it seems to mist filter at different points in the zoom ring. I don’t really know how to test it haha. Wide open, it feels really great

Yah for sure it makes sense to have something for darker receptions. You could also do an easy noise reduction on them. I haven’t heard of any photographers getting emailed after the wedding because reception images have grain. Might be something only we really care about

@@TaylorJacksonPhoto A photography friend of mine (well known in my city) got blasted on her Facebook page by one of her wedding clients for grainy photos. Then people gradually stopped hiring her for weddings and events. Now all she does is portraiture. I guess it depends on the client.

Haha there’s more to the story than that.

@@TaylorJacksonPhoto lol perhaps you're right. I think it might be a 70/30 ratio. 30% of clients are in fact aware of picture quality, some might be into or have dabbled in photography at some point in there life. Some might say they're happy with the photos, but really aren't or they like some of them. Every now and then someone will actually go on social media to do some damage lol.

@@TaylorJacksonPhoto His source... Trust me bro!

I just got it a couple of weeks ago after waiting months for it! It's really heavy I'm not sure how I feel about it yet lol

@@gabemiranda3121 ive had it since it launched. Every event I have used it for has been easy. No extra weight on your body. The only other lens I carry is the 24 samyang for those group/night shots up close. Its def worth the extra heft but you'll get used to it 👍

How long ago did you order before you got it?

@@kazouayang i didn't wait very long. I searched for a few hours though. Everything was sold out on the west coast when it launched so I tried different vendors out east. Are they still out of stock?

@@jjjaspw I order from BH since August 2022 and still on backorder as of now. That's where I always order my lens.

I'm from nagaland too

There’s a video on the channel about it

Thanks!

I prefer to eat alone. It’s not problem

@@TaylorJacksonPhoto My clients usually have a vendors table for like the DJ, officiant, video, and photographer etc

@@MaunoKoivistoOfficial you’re the photographer, you’re in the position.

I think a lot of people have made the switch because of it

It is both of these lenses as one. Weighs more like an older 70-200

@@TaylorJacksonPhoto Thank! i just sold 85GM and 35 GM to buy this lens. Hope it is the perfect replacement

Awb on Sony A7IV isn’t good

Why not just have it all as one lens?

This version of the lens doesn’t come for canon

@@TaylorJacksonPhoto that's totally beyond the point

Have you used the lens in real life? It’s plenty great

@@TaylorJacksonPhoto its 80% great, but not quite, especially in the corners with poor sharpness and vignetting at low apertures. you also talked about the mist effect which is true. this lense will serve most people well. But those who want the absolute best of the best should still stick to their standard range G master or RF zoom lenses, or primes

It would bring a lot of people to Z for sure. Or even do what they did with the 28-70 and put a new shell around a tamron lens and call it Nikon haha

@@TaylorJacksonPhoto I would get this lens, for z

@@Peachers July 2023, I have heard it is coming for Z mount soon.

Are you saying that the 35-150 is a budget lens? It's like $2000.

@@estebanmarquez6636 read my comment

@@Snapit551 i did, why do you think i wrote mine

Hard to judge if you haven’t seen the end results 🤔