😂

Ich könnte mir vorstellen, dass Austria mit Italien vertauscht wurde. Wo ist Rumänin, die Tschechei, die Slowakei, Norwegen, Australien, Kanada, u.s.w.

You are right.... Additionally Germany constructed 30.000 tanks and according the video lost the double number... Miracle!!!

​@@christianstaffa3789 Die Tschechoslowakei existierte damals nicht mehr. Das Sudetenland wurde in das Deutsche Reich eingegliedert, Böhmen und Mähren als Protektorate auch. Das war die Zerschlagung der sogenannten Resttschechei. Dadurch kamen die tschechischen Panzer 35T und 38T auf deutscher Seite zum Einsatz. Auch fanden französische Panzer wie zum Beispiel der Char B in den besetzten Gebieten noch eine Verwendung. Die Franzosen hingegen haben nach dem D-Day auch erbeutete Panzer V Panther eingesetzt, da sie mit den amerikanischen Sherman M4 nicht sonderlich zufrieden waren. Die "Pantherfibel" wurde dafür extra ins französische übersetzt. Die letzten Panther sind dort erst 1965 ausgemustert worden, wenn ich mich nicht irre.

Not a complete miracle if you consider the many "Beute-Panzer" = captured enemy tanks.

Yeah this moron of military must be an expert...

Maybe they meant the tank production in the Austrian part of the Reich (Nibelungenwerk, St. Valentin). But the production there was 4,800 PzKpfw IV.

@@nornje That would be an explanation

Romania left the chat

Italy Canada and Romania have no Lost one tank

Italy did not fight in World War II. She was hiding behind the backs of the Spaniards. Thanks to Spain, Germany lost the war

@@marcobaldini4326 Yes and Canada had two armoured divisions. One in France and one fighting in Italy.

In WW II Austria belogend to the German Reich since 1938 als the German district "Deutsche Ostmark". And in WWII the former Austrian men were only German citizenas and soldiers. And they had only German tanks! In 1945 the Russians, Americans and British reinvented Austria as a sepate country from Germany, after they had occupied Austria until 1953. Romania was an ally of Germany and fought aiganst the USSR until September 1944, When it was occuopied by the Soviet army Romania declared war on Germany and got an alliance with the USSR!

Romania ..los gipsy..se dieron vuelta rápidamente..

eine der größten panzerschlachten des 2. weltkrieges überhaupt, die den ausgang des krieges maßgeblich beeinflußt hat!

Liechtenstein won. They showed-up.

🤡👍

Brasile fought with 25.000 troops to take the Gothic line in Italy

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Венгрия была, а Италию и Румынию пропустили.

Тебе показали что куев взяли на праздник 7ноября. И все танками завалили. p.s. в 1940 году у англо-франко-бельгийцев ВСЕГО против немцев на фронте было менее 3тыс. танков. Но это так, в коллекцию ляпов этого ролика

источник видимо ППП(пол-палец-потолок).

чехов было немного при нападении на СССР чуть больше пятисотен, французов на фронте немцы использовали мало - они не понимали как в башне может быть один чел - у них даже на тройках в башне было 3 чела

@@greatnoblelord а спорим, что речь шла не исключительно о танках, а о всякой бронетехнике на их шасси: ПТ САУ, САУ! А вот здесь техника Чешская и французская доберёт баллов. Плюс переоборудки под их шасси.

Austria was annexed by Germany before the war started.

И Румынию пропустили.

Italy has no Lost one tank. Austria is the abbrevation of Australia

@@marcobaldini4326 Italy lost thousands of tanks during the war.

Есть же Австрия

Solo ad El Alamein l'Italia perse due divisioni Corazzate (132 e 133)

Had armour ? Had some gun ? Yes, M8 was more a thank that some tankette without turret.

@@sandroschmitt5660 Wheeled vehicles, no matter how powerful their armament, are not considered "tanks"; but only "armored". Especially because its incipient armor, compared to that of a "tank" (on tracks, heavily armored, etc.) is extremely weak. A layman might even call a light armored reconnaissance vehicle a “tank”. However, someone who is interested in military matters can never make this mistake.

Read:Austria

@@marcobaldini4326 Yeah, the great army of Austria eh?

The one excuse here might be that it's included into the UK's losses. And looking at the Wikipedia article they took the numbers from, seems like that's exactly the case.

@@Koukheras That excuse doesn’t account for Australia’s war against Japan in the Pacific and South East Asia where the UK ran away from in 1942.

@@seanlander9321 well, unfair as that may be, it's still counted as The Commonwealth I believe. Also, why am I defending this...

Как, если бежали по 50 км в день до Москвы.

@@alexanderjung7361 The jury is out on that one my friend.

@@PortmanRd First, Russia has not existed since 1918. The Germans in the Soviet Union were enslaved and built new factories behind the Urals from the USA.

Советские танки легко ремонтировались в полевых условиях. Поэтому эти данные можно назвать мусорными. С учётом ремонта машины и последующим её вводом в строй - один и тот же танк мог быть подбит по несколько раз.

​@@alexanderjung7361сам то понял, что написал про немцев? Или переводчик паршивый попался?!

And Canada, Australia, New Zeland..."" 🤔

Bulgaria was there in the beginning of the video with 47 losses. They took those losses fighting against the Germans from September 1944 to the end of the war.

​@@Filomeno28I believe those are counted as UK still, as The Commonwealth.

Да, тут не сказано, что Германия всю Европу и их танки использовали как свои.

Логичнее всю Западную Европу с танками записать, кроме Британии и США. Да, Югославия, Польша. Остальные на СССР шли.

​@@user-il4os7lv8s😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

Русские как всегда задавили тоннами мяса

Тонны мяса были от союзников СССР. Тонны мяса были от Германии, а Азе посоветую побывать в шкуре солдата и понять что такое мясо!

Dieses Video enthält dumme Fehler. Austria wurde erst 1945 nach dem Ende des 2. Weltkrieges von seinen 3 Besatzungsmächte UdSSR, USA und UK als selbstständiger Staat vom untergegangenen Deutschen Reich getrennt und wiederhergestellt. Im 2. Weltkrieg war es nur "Deutsche Ostmark" des Deutschen Reiches und hatte auch keine eigene Armee mehr.

Hungary developed and made their own armored vehicles and Austria had those.

По количеству было меньше на много чем у Совка.

@@alexanderjung7361 da questa stima superficiale : il totale carri alleati ammontano a 121.000 contro le forze dell'Asse 74.000

​@@alexanderjung7361перед началом ВОВ у СССР было 25000 танков, но числилось в РККА около 35 тысяч танков, из них более 9000 в ремонте. 90% это были лёгкие танки, и 80% всей техники было уничтожено без боя из-за плохой организованности войск. В остальном, по численности танков германская армия превосходила армию РККА. На начало ВОВ 80% танков в Германии состояли из танков Франции и Чехословакии. Каждый второй водитель механик у не цов был чех.

@@vitalykhen7855 The Red Army had 23,317 tanks on 22nd. June 1941. As you said, 90% were light tanks but excluding 3,500 tankettes, all the rest had 45mm tank guns, so nearly 20,000 Soviet tanks were armed with 45mm or over, as against 1,146 (with 50mm and short 75mm) on the German side. According to A.G. Solyankin, only 16.5%, or 2,300 were non operational or under repair.

@@joegatt2306 на самом деле, официальная информация в архивах СССР не полные, ввиду того, что в красной армии был полный непорядок. Части снабжения находились очень далеко, за неделю до начала войны начались учения во многих воинских частях, из-за этого снаряды были не боевые топлива не было, и технику просто бросали на дорогах, так и не вступив в бой. Перед учениями информация от снабжения была не точной, потому что, снабженцы боялись быть привлечены за беспорядок в армии, поэтому нет точной информации о количестве и военной техники перед войной. Информация, что есть точная информация о состоянии армии перед войной - фейк, потому что тогда вся истинная картина станет катастрофой. А если поддержать эту информацию, то тогда очнутся либеральные историки, которые прибавили лжи в реальность. Есть статистика по производству танков в СССР с 1922 года, но не учитывается статистика взятых в качестве плена в Первой Мировой войне и в гражданской в 1917-1922 годов. Я читал, что в СССР имелось 35 000 танков, из которых 9000 танков находились в ремонте, но в реальности, в ремонте находилось 14 000 танков, все боялись репрессий за бесхозяйственность и не докладывали руководству.

And where is Romania?

Strange

They only had 25 tanks and 12 of those they accidentally blew up themselves so they just left them out ◻️😂

Совкодрочун, ваши солдаты ничем от солдатов вермахта не отличались. Одно зло победило другое.

Без Ленд-лиза вы проигрывали и чуть Москву не потеряли, скажи спасибо Америке и Британии

@@Husker513 по любому бы победили бы. С помощью или без!

@@Rraakkee почему тогда совок до Москвы отступал? Вам этот момент в школах не договаривают?

@@Husker513 совок у тебя место головы хохломон ты

times 4 tank members per tank 340 to 350 thousand

Straszna masa żelaza .

A lot of the allied losses were including those that were in ships sunk by German and Japanese submarines. Germans lost quite a few in the Med due to transport destruction both sea and air. Japan lost most of their tanks in China and Eastern Russia. They only use a few on the islands and the Philippines. Most of those being light tanks and tankettes with some armored cars. They kept the big new ones for the defense of the home islands.

Annexed before the war

@@johncraig7823 yes I mean it was (already) annexed at the start.

Annexed? More than 90% of them wanted this after a vote!

Free French forces I expect. General Leclerc etc.

France had 4071 tanks in 1940, see 'Panzer IV vs Char B1 bis: France 1940' by S. Zaloga.

I think the video is including all armored fighting vehicles as 'tanks'. Also Free French forces grew quite large from 1944 onwards, mostly using U.S. equipment

La France a continué le combat avec les français libre en Afrique ou ils ont perdu des chars..puis pendant la campagne d'Italie..puis en France et en Allemagne.

maybe they lost the tanks that they didnt own

Regarding German losses, the number indicated is far off the mark, even if you add armored cars although the feature is supposedly only about tanks and SPGs. Germany produced 49,878 fully tracked gun-armed AFVs (which exclude maintenance vehicles, ammo carriers and the like) from 1932 to May 1945. This total includes over 5,630 PzKw 38(t) and its SPG derivatives and 407 Italian tanks built after 8th Sept.1943. The Germans also confiscated 219 PzKw 35(t) from Czechoslovakia and 399 Italian tanks, mainly Semovente types. They captured about 1,800 French tanks including 500 Renault FT 17/18 (few of these saw service but 100 did serve with Luftflotten Kdo 3). Of the rest, 670 R-35, H-38, S-35 and B2 tanks went into combat units, (180 surviving by the time of Operation Overlord) with another 576 chassis that were converted to SP artillery and A/T guns. They also captured just under 700 British tanks after Dunkirk and in North Africa of which one report claims that they made use of about 350, (which I seriously doubt) and about 50 to 60 Shermans from U.S. forces, (12 surrendered without firing a shot and ended up with the 10th. SS fighting the Russians in Stettin). On captured Soviet tanks, reports of 75 to 100 light tanks, (T-26, BT-5/7, T-60 & T-70) and 100 to 300 T-34 and KV tanks and the odd SU/ISU, in operational units, (out of about 800 captured) are mentioned on the Internet but official OKH report of 31st. May 1943, only lists 50 T-34, (17 serviceable), 3 KVs and 6 T-26 & T-70 while OKH report of 30 Dec.1944 gives 40 T-34 and 4 light tanks. So if you add up the entire German tank production of 49,878 AFVs and add to this figure, the maximum possible Beutepanzer, (captured tanks) of 2,700, the Germans would, at most, have had just over 52,600, which is nearly 15,000 short of 67,429! (a figure coming straight out of the usual unreliable Wikipedia) Sources: 'Encyclopedia of German Tanks of World War Two' by Chamberlain and Doyle and 'Panzer Tracts Nr.19-1 & 2 - Beute-Panzerkampfwagen' by Jentz and Regenberg.

Известно что немцы потеряли 30 тысяч танков, СССР 92 тысячи

@@user-qd9yb4vd9e Close, but that is exactly my point. The owner of the above feature video does not. He even included Austria as a separate warring nation and forgot Italy with 3,500 tank losses.

Так же как и бронетехника всех других стран.

Germany lost 155% of all the tanks they produced.

Трофеи

​@@user-ky3wn4he3z Germany built 49,888 tanks in WW2 including Czech and Italian produced tanks under German control. The Germans captured about 100 Polish (unknown number to combat units), 1,800 French, including 500 Renault FT 17/18 (few of the latter used but 100 did serve with Luftflotten Kdo 3) and 670 R-35, H-38, S-35 and B2 tanks which went into combat units, (180 surviving by the time of Operation Overlord). The rest were converted to mount German or Czech guns and are included with the German production total. They also captured just under 700 British tanks after Dunkirk and in North Africa of which they used about 350 and about 50 Shermans from U.S. forces. After the Italian armistice, they confiscated and used about 400 tanks, (with another 560 newly built but these are included with the 49,888 total). On captured Soviet tanks, reports of 80 to 100 light tanks, (T-26, BT-5/7, T-60 & T-70) and 100 to 300 T-34 and KV tanks in operational units, (out of about 800 captured) are mentioned on the Internet but official OKH report of 31st. May 1943, only lists 50 T-34, (17 serviceable), 3 KVs and 6 T-26 & T-70 while OKH report of 30 Dec.1944 gives 40 T-34 and 4 light tanks. That brings up the total to just over 51,500, or 52,000 if the higher number of captured (and used) Soviet tanks is considered. That is 16,000 to 16,500 less than the 67,429, which is straight from a Wikipedia site (with no listed source). As for Soviet number of tanks destroyed, the 86,500 figure is only for tanks. Actually, it was 83,500 but they lost another 13,000 SPGs for a total of 96,500. Source: Grigory F. Krivosheev - "Soviet Casualties and Combat Losses" (1997). And these losses do not include 'Trophy' tanks they lost in combat. At least 1,200 SU-76i on PzKw III chassis were converted by Zavod Nr. 38 alone not to mention entire companies composed of Panthers whose losses are unrecorded.

​@@joegatt2306 Thanks for your investigations.

А Советский Союз около 90000. Получается что все танки потерял. Только у него было 6 танковых армий. И куда-то пропала Италия с Румынией.

Кому интересно, почему советы потеряли больше танков чем Германия, то нужно учитывать, что Румыния воевала против СССР а так же Австрия.

Também achei estranho. 104 tanques de onde?

@@dorianesteves6120 ,o Brasil tinha uma unidade em treinamento nos EUA, com M4 Sherman. Mas não foram para a Europa, pois a guerra acabou antes.

Para o bem da verdade, e para o conhecimento dos ufanistas, o Brasil entrou na guerra ao final de 1944, e ela terminou ao final de Abril de 1945...ao final de 1944, a Alemanha já estava batida, lutando basicamente, com jovens de 14, 15, 16 anos, velhos, e pessoal de serviço, como cozinheiros, etc...a única unidade profissional, atuou em Dezembro de 1944, especificamente na batalha pelo porto de Antuérpia, quando os alemães pegaram os aliados de surpresa, e causaram um grande estrago naquelas tropas, a contar daí, a partir de Janeiro de 1945, veio a derrocada germânica...

O Brasil usou varios tanques na tomada de monte castello e principalmente em Montesi, sim o Brasil empregou muitos tanques nas tomadas de varias cidades e vilarejos na Italia e ao contrario que dizem os brasileiros enfrentaram tropas alemans bastante experientes no frente sovietico, inclusive fizeram a maior apreensão de tropas ou seja uma divisão inteira se rendeu aos Brasileiros em um total de 20 mil soldados alemães, vamos estudar e aprender a dar valor aos nossos heróis que sim fizeram a diferença na segunda guerra mundial

@@luizparagua é um desejo natural de muitos brasileiros, enaltecerem os 25.000 soldados que foram lutar na Itália, ao final do ano de 1944, ( a guerra terminou oficialmente no início de maio de 1945, cinco meses após o início da participação brasileira). Lembramos que a Alemanha estava em guerra contra o Mundo, desde primeiro de setembro de 1939, portanto, há mais de cinco anos...enquanto era estratégica e taticamente os Alemães operarem na região de Monte Cassino, o mais importante da região, eles ficaram. Exemplo disso, apenas um batalhao paraquedista Alemão, segurou, de dezembro de 1943 até maio de 1944, todo o grande exército liderado pelo norte americano Mark Clarke, composto por tropas americanas, francesas, inglesas, polonesas, australianas, neo-zelandesas, africanas, gurcas, etc., no Monte Cassino...após, os Alemães recuaram suas tropas mais qualificadas, e deixaram pedaços de divisões, compostas pelo pessoal de intendência, administrativo, soldados com 15, 16 anos de idade, sem experiência de combate, soldados com mais de 50 anos, para defender alguns pontos, como Monte Castelo, por exemplo...isso foi feito, porque os Generais Alemães viram que os Aliados estavam com pouco ímpeto, e os Alemães necessitavam de tropas experientes no front Leste, onde as hordas dos exércitos russos, usavam seus grandes efetivos, como "carne de canhão", com desprezo total a vida dos seus soldados, vide o número absurdo de russos mortos em relação aos Alemaes...portanto, após a retirada dos Alemães de Monte Cassino, toda a área passou a ser de importância secundária, porisso, o uso de tropas de segunda e terceira linhas, mesmo porque, os Alemães não dispunham mais de tropas de reserva, para realizar recompletamentos...Os Brasileiros pegaram, como se diz vulgarmente, uma "moleza", uma "lazanha", basta ver a quantidade de baixas dos Brasileiros, nos 05 meses que estiveram no teatro de guerra: pouco mais de 400 BAIXAS...Os Russos: mais de 25 milhões, os Alemães: mais de 05 milhões, os Indianos: mais de Dois Milhões e Meio, os Ingleses: mais de 650.000, os Franceses: mais de 550.000, os Norte-Americanos, mais de 500.000 baixas, apenas para citar alguns exemplos, a título de comparação...já que estamos falando do Exército Brasileiro, próximo do final do ano de 1944, quando chegaram na Itália, os Norte-Americanos tiveram que desensitizar os soldados brasileiros, que estavam repletos de piolhos e pulgas, dar roupa e botas adequadas, pois do contrário morreriam de frio com a roupa leve do Exército Brasileiro, bem como foram treinados por norte-americanos, haja vista o treinamento um tanto primitivo que receberam no Brasil, o que demandou um tempo considerável, para que, finalmente, ficassem operacionais...obs. Parece não ser adequado, "passarmos a mão na cabeça" dos Brasileiros, contando histórias ufanistas...Guerra é algo muito sério, e não é para amadores, por sorte dos nossos "pracinhas", chegaram quando os Alemães estavam semi-batidos, e tiveram um excelente "padrinho", que os acolheu, limpou, vestiu, armou, treinou e só então os colocou no "front": Os Norte-Americanos...

Maybe it’s about navy.

@@not_siddhant ?

I'm sick of Canada's war time effort being subsumed by the British or not recognized at all. What about the Australians, South Africans and New Zealanders too?

@@ravenclaw8975 Usually it's the Americans doing that but yup, the Brits are oblivious. The Americans are the biggest most bigliest big that is bigger than the biggest big ever and the Brits are just dozy.

@@abrahamdozer6273 That's the funniest stream of superlatives I've ever heard. It really cracked me up. If you did stand up comedy, I'd pay to go and see you. Thanks for cheering up my day! Cheers, RC

@@ravenclaw8975 It was AWESOME !!!!!

@@abrahamdozer6273 We can't see you over here, we only see Canada and Mexico, and if we squint really hard off into the horizon, we see a little island with a palace where the king sips his tea.

США

@@Husker513 и по Луне тоже ходили

из этого ролика ясно что СССР сделал наибольший вклад людскими жертвами (по разным причинам), и тем страннее слышать фразу "можем повторить". Ибо именно какими то тратами, расходами, экономической составляюшей, повторять особо нечего. Данные по расходам можете посмотреть сами. Среди этих танков же в ролике, не малая часть американских и британских, а многие Т-34 и прочие сделаны при помощи союзников

​@@Husker513 Это говорит что у вас у свидомвх рабская сущность!

@@AlexKoso благодарю за правду!

Austria was occupied from September 1938 until 27th April 1945 by Germany and form 27th April 1945 until 1953 by the Russans, Americans and British, who separated this country from Germany and made "Austria" without an own army!

@@WilloSNoack Austria had been "annexed" by Germany (It was not "occupied"). It was officially part of the Third Reich called "Ostmark" .

@@JohnMotamed Listen: Hitler wanted to reunify his German Reich with his motherland Austria, which belonged to Germany until 1866. In 1938 he let the German Wehrmacht invade his motherland. Aftre this occupation Seys-Inquart was chancler of the Republik Austria. Now Hitler let vote the Austrians for the entry of their country to the German Reich by a ballot. Most of the Austrians aggreed. Now Austria got back his old German name "Deutsche Ostmark" and Hitler was chancellor and ruled his motherland.

@@WilloSNoack независимая нейтральная Австрия имеет хорошую Армию и военную промышленность. ЛТ "Кирасир" например.

@@WilloSNoack Австрия была освобождена лишь в апреле 1945 года. В ВМВ не участвовала. Относительно войск освободителей ты забыл Францию.

Всё верно. Тебя наипале, про дидываевале. Берлин чей ? поджопник... и диды ускакале. 😂😂😂

Непонятно что имеется ввиду под потерянным танком. Поврежденные могли ремонтироваться и опять вводиться в строй.

Хоть кто-то вменяемый в комментариях

Перед войной в ссср было около 30000 танков. Произвели только т34 около 80000, плюс ленд лиз

@@user-rw6pf4jb1d Мельтюхов пересчитал буквально все советские танки перед войной, включая учебные и неисправные, получилось около 25000.

тоесть, вы реально верите, что гитлеровский евросоюз, все промышленные мощности Европы нашлёпали танков меньше, чем СССР в одиночку?

@@user-xp6hh9mp5y Germany built 48,870 tanks and used about 2,700 captured from France, Czechoslovakia and Italy. Romania and Hungary built 1,187 tanks between them. Italy's 3,500 tanks were concentrated in Africa or defense of the Peninsula.

@@user-xp6hh9mp5y НСДАП - национальная, социалистическая, рабочая партия Германии, самая близкая быдлосовку-404 партия по борьбе с западным капитализьмом. 😜😜😜

А у Советов будто было. Какие то дикие цифры

@@johnwick2745 НСДАП - национальная, социалистическая, рабочая партия Германии, самый близкий ученик и партнёр коммунячьей диктатуры-нквд, по борьбе с западными капитализьмами, демократиями, лгбт, джинсами, наглосаксами и жувачками. 😜😜😜

Captured, allied-made, or maybe some types of armored vehicle counted

Не забывай про трофейные танки: от Рz-38(t) до Рz КW-ll 754 "Призрак". А ещё помни про заводы покоренных Германией стран и торговлю с Рено. Австрия, Чехия, Франция... немецкие танки. Чьи танки Колобанов под Ленинградом в 1942 г бил?!

probably wikipedia. Germany built about 50,000 fully tracked armored fighting vehicles for the entire war.

They obviously just made it up as its so full of bullshit.

O Brasil enviou um divisão que lutou na Itália em 1944/45 e aviação de caça equipada com P-47.

Brazilian soldiers made way for the US army, equipped by it and under its command.

I learn something new about the world every day on youtube

Some serious combat in Italy under U.S. command and mostly U.S. supplies.

Экспедиционный корпус Бразилии участвовал в боях в Италии с 1943 года. Было задействовано 35 тыс бразильских солдат, 10 эскадрилий авиации и флот.

Brazilian soldiers were US Army units with US equipment, uniform and command. Fully integrated into the US military.

@@ivotorelli424 I knew. Brazil declared war I didn’t know they had tank troops deployed Thanks

Brazilian troops fought in major battles in Italy from 1943 onwards

@@scottabc72 that is interesting, I’m a history nerd and studied the Italian campaigns but had never known this.

@@scottabc72 No, just after 1944, november.

Well, Germany lost them all because of the Austrian commander.

@@lucasbatista1453 yes true but only after they took them all off austria in the first place. and well the same thing happened to the czechs.

true they also managed to pickup a few from the french in 1940 as well, and a handful of matilda 1s and light tanks from the british.

@@lucasbatista1453très jolie blague

They barely got any tanks in WW2

@@AutherComrade yeah. That seems logic man

@@martinhektor1498those were only tanks brought from Germany

@@factorerivative and USSR with US. After 1939 they give China tanks and others weapons

Check out the Ausgleich (Compromise) 1867. That will answer your question.

@@Steven-dt5nu what does a treaty from 1862 had to do with WW2 when Germany and Austria were a single state?

Ещё Германия воевала на три фронта против 52 стран мира.

​@@alexanderjung7361это же сверхлюди, надо понимать. Черепа правильные

The french fought for the soviets too, in an air force squad in Yak 1 or 3s.

@@justforfun_ger7137 only a squad.

@@user-RedStar each bitte helps , or not?

Si eso es cierto, los alemanes protegian mucho su tecnologia en esos tiempos! Ahora Rusia los captura en ucrania muy faciles. Se nota que Alemania es muy debil!

Советская армия того времени была самой боеспособной армией на планете. А сухопутное вооружение было лучшим. Танковый парк 41 года состоял на 90% из лёгких танков, которые пробивались из противотанковых ружей и зенитных автоматических лёгких пушек. Танковый парк 45 года на более чем 80% состоял из средних и тяжёлых танков. В целом, армия СССР 45 года минимум втрое уступала армии союзников по силе. А экономически, СССР был ещё более слабым и истощенным. Пропаганда западных стран часто манипулирует цифрами. Но СССР никогда не был мощным государством, его сила была не в сильном централизованном правительстве (до 1980 года), сильной идейной культуре и пропаганде, а также в достаточном количестве человеческого ресурса. Так или иначе, но СССР, после 1980 года под действием национальных сил стал рушиться. Сегодня, Россия не имеет и трети потенциала СССР 1980 года.

@@Manuel_Fal_Conde All forces around the world were 100% combat ready. Idk what you mean by the Soviet army was the most combat-ready of all. How can you even make such statement. These nations were in a total war for over 5 years. The Soviet army was huge but so was the American army. At that time the US forces had more available tanks and much bigger indusrty to support their war efforts. Not just more tanks but more trucks, more armored cars, more planes more of everything. What they had less is deployed soldiers in Europe as America was fighting 2 fronts. That would have changed tho and could have changed very very quickly. The USSR was in ruins and huge part of their population was no more.

​@@napobg6842 согласен с тобой.

И что США могли по сущности солдаты США были не кудышными войнами, толко с помощью Советской армией они смогли победить японцев, американских танки тоже были не кудычными их в России заказывали в землю по башню и использовали как огневую точку!

@@user-tc7ih8ko6s The Soviets never helped with anything. They attacked what was a defeated enemy. If it wasn't for the Americans the Soviets would have decisively lost WW2 to the Germans. This is also supported by people like Stalin and Zhukov

Specifically many were Croatian. This video just didn't distinguish them from Serbian or any other Slavic group within those borders.

+ 20000 Panzer 1 , 2 , 3 ,4 Germany build 30000 main battle tanks .30000 ,but not more. 70000 maybe included the infantrie support tanks Sturmgeschütz 2,3,4 and included the tank destroyers Marder,Hetzer,Elefant,Ferdinand,Jagdpanzer4,Jagdpanther,Jagdtiger.

Красная Армия КПК принимала активное участие в боевых действиях. Что касается танков - их поставлял в Китай СССР с 1937 года.