North Korea's NEW Tank is a Nightmare

  Рет қаралды 3,438,536

Task & Purpose

Task & Purpose

Күн бұрын

If you’re ever injured in an accident, you can check out Morgan & Morgan. You can start your claim in just a click without having to leave your couch. To start your claim, visit: www.forthepeople.com/TaskandP...
The M2020 was first unveiled in October of 2020, during a military parade celebrating the 75th anniversary of the North Korean Communist Workers’ Party. A total of nine drove down the main avenue during the parade, sporting what looked like modern optics, armor plating, and even active protection systems. The prototype tanks were shown off along with their new rocket systems, and a mobile gun system that’s definitely not a stryker at all.
MERCH Drop: taskandpurpose.myspreadshop.com/
By all accounts, the M2020 is still in its prototyping and testing phase, and each time this tank has popped up, it’s been a bit more developed. But based on current information and looking at the rest of the DPRK’s tank fleet, we have a good idea of where the tank is at in production, and what its rough capabilities are.
One of the first things you’ll notice about the M2020 is just how visually distinct it is compared to what North Korea has shown off in the past. Historically the country has used a derivative of Russian T-62 tank designs. Trade embargos on the country, especially in the realm of military equipment have largely prevented North Korea from obtaining modern tank technology. The tanks we do see are generally frankensteined designs incorporating a base model T-62 design, with various overlapping additions from other tanks like T-72s and Type 88s as they’ve managed to get pieces of them.
Currently North Korea fields three designs, the Chonma-ho, the Pokpung-ho, and Songun-915, the latter of which was equipped with a standard 125mm smoothbore cannon.
Typically with each newer iteration of North Korean tank, a few incremental upgrades are all that are done with each, but the M2020 quickly broke this trend.
On the surface the new tank looks like a rough combination of an M1 Abrams, the T-14 Armata, and Chinese VT-4 in some areas. This has led to some speculation that China or Russia provided some level of assistance in designing the tank, which would fall in line with trends of greater cooperation between North Korea and the other two countries. This comparison to Western tanks was highlighted with its choice of desert camo, which by all accounts is useless in the Korean peninsula, but similar to a majority of modern tanks it would be based on. The latest images of the M2020 post 2023 and into 2024 now show them sporting a darker greener look, which is more suited to North Korea’s geography. Additionally with the new paint came the addition of explosive reactive armor bricks on the turret, and what appears to be T-14-like ERA plating on the side, which was absent in the initial introduction in 2020.
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @taskandpurpose
Task & Purpose is a military news and culture oriented channel. We want to foster discussion about the defense industry.
Email capelluto@taskandpurpose.com for inquires.
#TANK #WAR #northkorea

Пікірлер: 5 200
@Taskandpurpose
@Taskandpurpose 3 ай бұрын
If you’re ever injured in an accident, you can check out Morgan & Morgan. You can start your claim in just a click without having to leave your couch. To start your claim, visit: www.forthepeople.com/TaskandPurpose?s=86%3A2313
@KC-nd7nt
@KC-nd7nt 3 ай бұрын
Read the website comments . Hilarious
@gordonprice695
@gordonprice695 3 ай бұрын
Hod, ambulance chaser ads were the worst part of 1970's & 80's TV. Now KZfaq is doing it, only 99.999% of KZfaq is garbage also. Goggle really does just suck as a company.
@boutinpowered8373
@boutinpowered8373 3 ай бұрын
Imagine investing in upgraded tank designs and when nearing completion you watch videos from Ukraine taking tanks out with handheld drones.
@tusk3260
@tusk3260 3 ай бұрын
The microchip myth is stupid. Why would only US allies and the US themselves be able to make microchips. Its really not hard to make those: By or steal the plans to make the machines to make them. Step 2, build the machine. Step 3 watch the microchips being made as all you need to do is feed the machine with energy and materials.
@tusk3260
@tusk3260 3 ай бұрын
the bradleys sent to Ukraine dont have a reloading capacity for their tow missiles.
@user-kl4iz8ut1w
@user-kl4iz8ut1w 3 ай бұрын
Rather than knowing how bad North Korea's new tanks are, I'm more shocked that they even have "new" tanks
@AbuHajarAlBugatti
@AbuHajarAlBugatti 3 ай бұрын
Its still a tank and they are still able to produce their own with modern technical equipment so underestimating that is BS
@Matthew-is7zs
@Matthew-is7zs 3 ай бұрын
I'm not that shocked I was waiting for either Russia of China or even both countries to slighly help the DPRK get fairly modern tanks to help keep the balance against what they see as American imperalism
@VeioooOOO
@VeioooOOO 3 ай бұрын
You are so naive to underestimate them so much.
@user-kl4iz8ut1w
@user-kl4iz8ut1w 3 ай бұрын
@@Matthew-is7zs Our country's tanks have not launched new products for several years. On the Chinese Internet, we will complain that the Army's tanks are too old compared to the Navy's warships and Air Force aircraft. As for the Russian tanks... at least they're still trying to move in Ukraine, right?
@Bernoris
@Bernoris 3 ай бұрын
I'm honestly more shocked that they made a working APS system, that's honestly impressive
@AvocadoAfficionado
@AvocadoAfficionado 3 ай бұрын
Kim wanted a twin-barrelled tank but they had to talk him down to bolt-on ATGMs instead.
@dorivaldojunior2254
@dorivaldojunior2254 3 ай бұрын
He wanted a mammoth tank hahaha
@Daginni1
@Daginni1 3 ай бұрын
@@dorivaldojunior2254 Kim has the only computer in North Korea. It is only able to play Red Alert 1. He is playing Red Alert 1 to learn how to fight the Western countries. Twin barrel big tank with anti-air missile launcher will win the day.
@Wolfen443
@Wolfen443 3 ай бұрын
@@dorivaldojunior2254 , the War Elephant design seems like overkill for an armor vehicle but sure, someone like Kim can dream that up. I can see it possible for mobile artillery, but not for tanks.
@joedoe6444
@joedoe6444 3 ай бұрын
on a serious note, i don't know the capabilities of the russian kornet ATGMs, but if it is like Ukraine's Stugna-Ps that can also be used on low flying helicopters, i could see a possible use for them. other than that, they would be more of a liability between cost, additional maintenance, and an exposed weakness on the turret.
@breadtoasted2269
@breadtoasted2269 3 ай бұрын
@@dorivaldojunior2254he probably plays halo wars
@kurdtcoben
@kurdtcoben 2 ай бұрын
Kim Jong Un has been playing World of Tanks recently, pointed at every single model available and told his staff "I want this one!"
@user-ne6xw1sv4u
@user-ne6xw1sv4u Ай бұрын
So many fools comment so many craps.
@Jimbeaux
@Jimbeaux Ай бұрын
I heard that when the turret is blown off, and it lands upside down, it can be converted into a wok .
@sorecawk
@sorecawk Ай бұрын
you win😂
@gilibran
@gilibran Ай бұрын
That;s whishfull thinking on the NK side becasue they have no food to put into said wok
@EduardoAchondo
@EduardoAchondo 28 күн бұрын
😂
@IAMZERG
@IAMZERG 27 күн бұрын
​@@gilibrandarn you. You beat me to it 😤
@edwinchristensen1439
@edwinchristensen1439 26 күн бұрын
Do tankers taste like pork
@Byepolarchaos
@Byepolarchaos 3 ай бұрын
The fourth guy is down deep inside the tank, pedaling as hard as he can
@TheJustinJ
@TheJustinJ 2 ай бұрын
😂
@cryonic.
@cryonic. 2 ай бұрын
some flinstones type shit, hes walking that hunk of junk all the way
@cloudpandarism2627
@cloudpandarism2627 2 ай бұрын
i am in stitches. comment section didnt disappoint as expected! 🤣
@scocon8658
@scocon8658 2 ай бұрын
Well that's one way of peddling their wares, I suppose...
@user-ne6xw1sv4u
@user-ne6xw1sv4u Ай бұрын
I guess u talked about the future Abrams tank, as footprint carbon matters.
@nattananchunbunluesook8474
@nattananchunbunluesook8474 2 ай бұрын
🇰🇵: We have new tanks, but we won’t reveal much information about it tho. War Thunder Players: *nuh uh*
@lcm1220
@lcm1220 2 ай бұрын
fr
@komiks42
@komiks42 Ай бұрын
​@@KPH1992We told you to be quiet..
@beanman929
@beanman929 Ай бұрын
​@@KPH1992what in the hell is wrong with you
@IRateVideosInTheComments
@IRateVideosInTheComments Ай бұрын
@@KPH1992what?
@Crow_Harder24
@Crow_Harder24 Ай бұрын
​@@KPH1992 Reported for spam 😂
@donktheclown
@donktheclown 24 күн бұрын
Some KZfaqr that defected from north korea states that the parades that feature enormous missile carriers have simple hollow steel tubes made to look like missiles.
@BaconLover100
@BaconLover100 12 күн бұрын
Link?
@hotcakesism
@hotcakesism 12 күн бұрын
Well yeah why would they bring live munitions to the parade ground? Use your damn minds people
@enlightendbel
@enlightendbel Ай бұрын
This feels a lot like those ricer cars that have a ton of stickers, bolt on chrome exhaust nozzles and huge spoilers, but nothing under the hood but a bare stock engine. Lotsa visuals, but none of it actually does anything.
@LMaudy
@LMaudy 3 ай бұрын
my Chinese friend said the tank was built with the spirit of the people, he then said: "i mean literally, dead people's souls"
@allentertainment1512
@allentertainment1512 3 ай бұрын
I see what you did there. 💀💀
@stc2828
@stc2828 3 ай бұрын
Can’t blame them, gotta please the machine god 😊
@TheRezro
@TheRezro 3 ай бұрын
He most likely say the truth.
@markpozsar5785
@markpozsar5785 3 ай бұрын
How is your friend being Chinese relevant here
@LMaudy
@LMaudy 3 ай бұрын
@@markpozsar5785 Because they have a better understanding of NK than me?Because he went there as a Chinese tourist for one day? Because they have tighter trade with NK than the west? Because NK students studies at his school? Why is that irrelevant when it’s factual?
@martinantab3520
@martinantab3520 3 ай бұрын
My first question when i saw the M2020: "Wait...why the hell it looks like an M1A2 Abrams tank?"
@rustynail6819
@rustynail6819 3 ай бұрын
The Chinese got a lot of them from Afghanistan. We left a LOT there and not just old M1A-1 but newer ones. The CCP got a lot of gear from their.
@4411825
@4411825 3 ай бұрын
Most modern MBT have that same boxy layout the same as stealth fighters have the save general design features because of the function dictates the form!
@Mrwhomeyou
@Mrwhomeyou 3 ай бұрын
@@rustynail6819 i'm kinda upset that they acquired the hummer h1 but didn't make anymore of them for sale
@haroldcarfrey4206
@haroldcarfrey4206 3 ай бұрын
@@rustynail6819 We left gear, but we did not leave an Abrams... Given the number of UH60 left behind, do not be suprised a chinese copy of that comes out soon...
@stephaneric3021
@stephaneric3021 3 ай бұрын
Put on your reading glasses Peggy Sue
@reloads223
@reloads223 Ай бұрын
I called Kim, he said the ATGM are more cost effective, addresses logistical resupply problems, saves on barrel wear , and to be employed from defensive and commanding heights positions. Also Kim said his tank is loosely based on the Japanese MBT type 10. Kim also said he really likes your show and hopes you come for a visit sometime.
@hanswurst6712
@hanswurst6712 Ай бұрын
Great to have an embassador of the great leader Kim here in this comment section. :)
@BaconLover100
@BaconLover100 12 күн бұрын
What a nice guy, I'm sure his country is lovely!
@AryanJYOLO
@AryanJYOLO 10 күн бұрын
This comment underrated af 😢
@vralingfrostmere1561
@vralingfrostmere1561 2 ай бұрын
i think with the atgms they aren't designed to be reloaded in the middle of combat, people always think "oh how would you ever reload those in battle and how would you constantly keep them supplied with the missiles" and i think it's more of a thing where they start out with them, they use them, and then they don't get reloaded until they're out of combat and the missiles are available, the tank would still be perfectly capable of being deployed just without the missiles loaded
@theimmortal4718
@theimmortal4718 Ай бұрын
I agree. Allows the tank to tp engage from long range without having to give away its position. Tanl gun muzzle blasts are very loud, dusty, and flashy
@The_Foxymew
@The_Foxymew 22 күн бұрын
@@theimmortal4718 I'd argue that a much slower, fire propelled missile, probably with a guide wire leading directly to the tank firing it, which has to stay in sight of their target... Is a lot less stealthy than firing a single, extremely fast dart and driving away. Addendum: It is not wire guided, but laser guided. So no guide wire, but you still have to stay and guide the missile to its target. The newest specs for the updated Kornet is 250/300m/s or so for velocity. A 125mm canon firing APFSDS will likely be firing above 1700m/s.
@theimmortal4718
@theimmortal4718 22 күн бұрын
@@The_Foxymew A 125mm gun blast is much less stealthy than a missile launch. There's no way anyone would witness both and think otherwise
@The_Foxymew
@The_Foxymew 22 күн бұрын
@@theimmortal4718 In a vacuum, maybe. But I feel the long travel time, and the fact that missiles aren't exactly quiet, kinda offset that. I think both would be noticed, just that the gun blast would be noticed when the target's already hit. The missile will still be in transit by the time you're spotted, and you can't even move until you hit your target, because it's laser guided. It's not a fire-and-forget system. Addendum: An APFSDS travels several times faster than the speed of sound. At something like 4 kilometres of distance, you'll have barely 3 seconds to react to a flash of light, before something has been struck. An ATGM travels slower than the speed of light. At the same 4 kilometres, you have what? 13 seconds from launch to impact. 13 seconds you have to stay in sight of your target, guiding a laser at it.
@theimmortal4718
@theimmortal4718 22 күн бұрын
@@The_Foxymew Wait- Are you under the impression that combat is one on one like call of duty? Do you think tanks are fighting alone?
@austenlindberg3615
@austenlindberg3615 3 ай бұрын
"Tractor parts and cardboard held together by duct tape" Don't diss my boy Bob Semple tank like that
@Attaxalotl
@Attaxalotl 3 ай бұрын
That was corrugated steel, TYVM
@Gerhardium
@Gerhardium 3 ай бұрын
@@Attaxalotl and chewing gum plus some laminated crustacean shells as a spall liner.
@ligametis
@ligametis 3 ай бұрын
RedEffect wasn't this sceptical
@Attaxalotl
@Attaxalotl 3 ай бұрын
@@ligametis Because he's an authoritarian rooster suckler
@goonbuggy1135
@goonbuggy1135 3 ай бұрын
Every 10 yr olds, 40k titan made out of pringles cans.
@hernerweisenberg7052
@hernerweisenberg7052 3 ай бұрын
Looks funny how the main gun is wobbling around in that parade footage. This tank will not be able to hold a beer.
@borris542
@borris542 2 ай бұрын
Tanks dont usually drive around with the stabiliser on at all times due to a increased maintenance cost but I do agree it looks funny
@ojjuiceman
@ojjuiceman 2 ай бұрын
It's funny I already know what video you are talking about.
@alexorehowski3387
@alexorehowski3387 2 ай бұрын
Like Abrams can. Western tanks have not been battle tested until Ukraine where they failed miserably.
@kylerogers175
@kylerogers175 2 ай бұрын
@@alexorehowski3387 I want whatever it is that you're smoking. Russia has lost somewhere in the neighborhood of 5,000 tanks over the course of its illegal invasion of Ukraine. Ukraine has lost a handful of Leopard 2's and at least one Challenger 2.
@boltok9584
@boltok9584 2 ай бұрын
@@kylerogers175 while also the biggest note not being used by American Troops who have much more extensive training/combat use with said Tanks. Its like watching an amateur gun enthusiast use a m60 vs a highly trainer Marine. The results will be massively different.
@jameskress6608
@jameskress6608 Ай бұрын
Chris, your programs are first class in all respects. Your research and analysis are thorough; your presentations very clear, highly informative and yes, entertaining as well. You are one very smart and exceptionally well informed "Mud Soldier." Your contribution to the American people is greatly appreciated by this old soldier. "NEVER Quit", Col. J. P. Kress, USA (Ret.)
@johnlong7504
@johnlong7504 2 ай бұрын
Thanks for your large efforts to update us about their monster tanks, take care and be safe!
@Redawesomeoby
@Redawesomeoby 3 ай бұрын
bro bought an abrams off temu for 90% off 💀
@phaexus
@phaexus 2 ай бұрын
Free shipping on all orders. Limited-time offer.
@m1a2_sepv4_abrams
@m1a2_sepv4_abrams 2 ай бұрын
kimbrams
@lcm1220
@lcm1220 2 ай бұрын
@@m1a2_sepv4_abrams lmao
@user-ne6xw1sv4u
@user-ne6xw1sv4u Ай бұрын
Oh! Abrams tanks lose so many values.
@josephdias5859
@josephdias5859 Ай бұрын
n1 willjams
@S.O.A.R.
@S.O.A.R. 3 ай бұрын
First rule of warfare, NEVER underestimate your opponent. Even if they were made from wood, you should treat them like they are more advanced than yours, until you know for certain it's not.
@stlawstlaw7585
@stlawstlaw7585 3 ай бұрын
90% of YT videos are nothing but Murican propaganda (including this bs)
@TovKafur
@TovKafur 3 ай бұрын
Overestimating can be even worse than underestimating, especially if a general knows how to use his reputation.
@TankboiDeng
@TankboiDeng 3 ай бұрын
underestimating is more fatal than overestimation! do you hear yourself?@@TovKafur
@TovKafur
@TovKafur 3 ай бұрын
@@TankboiDeng Yes, i hear myself. I also know lots of situations when the battles and wars were lost solely due to overestimating, like famous ploy of a fortress being defended by a sole musician, or like entire history of Rommel's adventures in Africa.
@PPKwazz999
@PPKwazz999 3 ай бұрын
@@TovKafur respectfully, can you name a war that was lost due to overestimating the enemy
@etiennebouddha6352
@etiennebouddha6352 2 ай бұрын
The advantage of Abrams tank is that they can be seen by satellite because of the intense heat they exhale. 😂
@fobbitoperator3620
@fobbitoperator3620 2 ай бұрын
It's probably a heavily up-armored Yugo GT 4 door wagon, nicknamed, the "Wego..."
@SuperDrake85
@SuperDrake85 3 ай бұрын
They had 9 of them that were apparently able to move under their own power for an entire parade. Say what you will but its still better than the T-14 Armata.
@gonfreaks937
@gonfreaks937 3 ай бұрын
The tank itself or the impression given by the presentation?
@TheManOfMyriad
@TheManOfMyriad 3 ай бұрын
Design wise it's got a lot of similarities to the T-14 Armata doesn't it?
@elliottapfel3609
@elliottapfel3609 3 ай бұрын
I read that the reason the T-14 actually looked broke down was because the crew had absolutely zero training on it outside turning on and giving gas. Not sure if it's true but read the driver accidentally hit the parking brake and didn't understand why it would not move.. not sure it true but seems kind of believable.
@4411825
@4411825 3 ай бұрын
The T-14 is a next generation tank that all others must compete against 🫡
@MaxTheLegend_YT
@MaxTheLegend_YT 3 ай бұрын
@@4411825they are already fighting against getting canceled by ruZZian MOD
@Th3Shrike
@Th3Shrike 3 ай бұрын
Meanwhile the other Korea's k2 can function as a pseudo artillery with smart rounds, and their actual artillery can give the topographer a job every seven seconds
@ghostofmarx867
@ghostofmarx867 3 ай бұрын
The T-series tanks they have most technical experience with all have the ability to do this, either with manual range tables, or electronic range calculation. The Russians have been doing this for years, and the North Koreans almost certainly have this ability as well.
@MrAxeofcapitalism
@MrAxeofcapitalism 3 ай бұрын
Doesnt matter if they have no south koreans to man them in 20 years
@AbuHajarAlBugatti
@AbuHajarAlBugatti 3 ай бұрын
@@MrAxeofcapitalismyeah horrible demographics and now the women go on feminist NoChild strike
@ghostofmarx867
@ghostofmarx867 3 ай бұрын
@@MrAxeofcapitalism lol, almost like pricing your own population out of having a family is a bad idea 🤣
@Khornecussion
@Khornecussion 3 ай бұрын
@@ghostofmarx867 Fair. If they want more kids, should start a program to incentivize having one or two children.
@oldencreek6587
@oldencreek6587 2 ай бұрын
I did the math. According to the numbers displayed at 11:16, NK's gdp isn't "about 100 times less " than SK's gdp, it's 34.6 times less.
@surferdude4487
@surferdude4487 17 күн бұрын
Grammar nazi checking in here. WTF do you mean?
@pyroprayerpreyx9692
@pyroprayerpreyx9692 2 ай бұрын
One note, at 7:51, you mention bright feathers to scare off predators, you're in the right realm of Asomatic coloration, but its not feathers and birds in this case usually, its mostly Amphibians and some reptiles, such as snakes. Feather color is mostly used to attract mates. Great video though.
@ShihanQu
@ShihanQu 2 ай бұрын
You telling me I won't get laid if I garage one of these?
@nathanwright8598
@nathanwright8598 3 ай бұрын
“….. is the factory that I just mispronounced …..” hahaha. This is why I love this channel.
@nerfherder4284
@nerfherder4284 3 ай бұрын
I added the same comment....you know for the grithm
@slypear
@slypear 3 ай бұрын
Glad to see this comment! Great humour - haha
@jhmartin641
@jhmartin641 3 ай бұрын
"Why do you watch Task & Purpose instead of other military channels?" This. This right here.
@thekingsilverado3266
@thekingsilverado3266 3 ай бұрын
Like everything else the engines are probably provided by China and as well tuned for climate and environment as is all the junk they produce. Being all speculation from what I know if it is a diesel engine top range would be about 60 to 75 miles if that. One can clearly see by the things profile there is no spare fuel spaces on the thing. Not even a tool compartment either by appearances I make that subjective statement. Part of the height of the Abrams is the fuel tank under it. Otherwise if would look a lot like that 2020 abortion on treads. Being made in NK that produces next to nothing mechanical the hydraulic systems are probably the worst of their kind as far as surviving diff climates and the engines surviving diff blends of fuels. Thee epitome of the reasons Russian tanks ain't so popular in South America. Mexico had quite a few T34s and T72s. Over the years they just stopped running because of lousy fuels. Most South American truck drivers fill up in the USA and take reserves back. I have noticed quite a few trucks going back and forth over border with extra saddle tanks on em even 100 gallon main fuel tanks for just such purposes.
@robertporter6683
@robertporter6683 3 ай бұрын
It's incredibly efficient! Inside the rear compartment are 4 wheels with 9 year old Korean kids running like hell.
@AimeeGirl
@AimeeGirl 3 ай бұрын
Powered by Fred Flintstone!
@NorthKorean_dictatorship
@NorthKorean_dictatorship 3 ай бұрын
We know where you live
@erictruong6551
@erictruong6551 3 ай бұрын
​@@NorthKorean_dictatorship you funny boy Jung-Un. Congratulations on this new 'best tank in the world' comrade. Look very pretty. Da da. It's nice.😊
@Ducaso
@Ducaso 3 ай бұрын
Ah, is the old flintstone engine design making a comeback?
@darnit1944
@darnit1944 3 ай бұрын
How many horsepowers does a 9 year old create?
@DeeP-_PerspectivE
@DeeP-_PerspectivE Ай бұрын
1 $500 inhouse made drone will take care of that ATGM attachment ... and the whole tank 😂
@awakendsails
@awakendsails 27 күн бұрын
There is no tank that can get through a field where drones fly in swarms. They all go boom. lol
@angel_cheon-sa
@angel_cheon-sa 3 ай бұрын
Bradley has entered the chat. Bradley's main gun actually killed more tanks than tanks have killed tanks. One benefit of the TOW though, is that it has a longer range than the main gun. You can hit the enemy before they're able to hit back.
@Chris-fn4df
@Chris-fn4df 3 ай бұрын
It killed more _obsoletely armored_ tanks than other tanks in the same theater killed tanks. Fixed it for you.
@smyers820gm
@smyers820gm 3 ай бұрын
@@Chris-fn4dfno you really didn’t fix shit. You just showed the whole internet that you’re a windbag that likes to hear his own voice
@pbinnj3250
@pbinnj3250 3 ай бұрын
The TOW is wire guided, correct? If so, how’s it possible to have a wire that is thin enough, spools out fast enough, and knows when to let go of the originating weapon? I mean, how does it work. I understand some submarine torpedoes operate the same way. And for miles, right?
@4411825
@4411825 3 ай бұрын
Exactly about the ATGM and why the lack of professionalism of this video didn’t understand that is funny! All Russian MBT beyond the T-62 series have this capability 🤦🏾‍♂️
@lonurad1259
@lonurad1259 3 ай бұрын
@@4411825 I was gonna say the same lol. The question isn't why a tank has an atgm. Spoiler alert many tanks around the world have atgms on it that's not the problem. If these are top attack atgms then they're actually useful. Problem with a main gun fired atgm or shell is that it has to go through armour. Top down attack missiles... don't. I don't think this guy knows much about tank weapons. As for it being on a launcher. Technically makes it more versatile. Like it can at theory kill a tank with the atgm then follow up with a shot from the main gun. The atgm is a guaranteed hit essentially but the gun can still deviate. also the talk about a grenade launcher being on top instead of a 50 cal. Yeah. That's pretty obvious why you'd want that lol. The whole point of the 50 cal was to take out armoured vehicles and these days just light armoured vehicles. However how useful that actually is compared to a normal machine gun and more importantly, a fully automatic grenade launcher that can fire dual purpose rounds for anti armour and anti infantry... yeah a grenade launcher is a bit more useful. Israel already uses them. So does the US but the US doesn't mount them on tanks. Not that it makes much sense to me because if you're forced into an urban environment an automatic grenade launcher is hands down more effective than a main gun, coax or 50 cal. Whatever though.
@bro1161
@bro1161 29 күн бұрын
I have a feeling it’s just like a flint stones contraption where they have like a bunch of men running on a treadmill to power it and everything is just sheet metal
@cr4yv3n
@cr4yv3n 21 күн бұрын
Kim: "Hey bro i put an anti-tank weapon on your anti-tank vehicle equipped with an anti-tank weapon so you can take out tanks!"
@stacymcmahon453
@stacymcmahon453 3 ай бұрын
Those slots in the turret armor for the APS mean it's probably not actual armor, just a skirt or spaced armor over the same old cast turret.
@Lurch-Bot
@Lurch-Bot 3 ай бұрын
Yeah, IDK what OP is smoking. Pretty obvious that isn't armor plating and the real armor is behind it.
@Griffin_Clan
@Griffin_Clan 3 ай бұрын
They probably mounted a slot for an APS just so that when other countries ask where their armour is they can say "an APS goes there, we just don't have the APS. There's armour underneath there though." "How much armour?" "I'm late for school and my dog ate my homework" "How much armour is under that APS slot?" "Byeeeeee!"
@AlphaHorst
@AlphaHorst 2 ай бұрын
​@@Lurch-Botyou do realise how modern armour works do you? Composite armour is a sandwhich. you have a baseplate and an outer plate, at times there is a middle plate. All of those are traditional facehardened steel. Inbetween you have layers of composite materials stacked and angled. It is 100% possible to have holes in that stack for mounting of systems. And every tank using such a system on its turret has done just that. Optics are all mounted in exactly that way.
@AlphaHorst
@AlphaHorst 2 ай бұрын
@@cryhavocandletslipthedogso1873 oh, your problem is that you go with that as "armour" but no modern mbt uses it as armour. it is the material used to sourround armour and guard it. All steel plates are either face hardened or just hardened depending on the quality, it does not really matter. Lighter vehicles use aluminium for the same purpose. Composite armour is the mix of it all but it needs a frame and that frame is still usually steel. Exact composition remain a secret. It would make sense that only one plate is treated specially while the internal one is softer on purpose to reduce spalling, but again most people will probably never know. I donˋt know for the M1A2 or leo 2, but the T72s use(d?) face hardeing on their upper front plate with the composit materials behind it in a sligtly milder angle than the front plate. but the exact material really does not matter to my point. it is just a shell meant to cover the composite armour inside, which is usually multiple slates of ceramic and other materials arranged in a specific form to increase protection.
@brentfarvors192
@brentfarvors192 2 ай бұрын
Prob also why it's equipped with the APG...Most likely a primitive response to drone warfare...
@derantorkiarig4592
@derantorkiarig4592 3 ай бұрын
"A break in the armor would be a weak point" Yeah, well, that is if that *is* armor, and not just a bit of superstructure on top of a normal T62 turret hiding beneath. :P
@davidpowell6098
@davidpowell6098 3 ай бұрын
It looks like plywood to me, a bad try at pimping their T62's. I'm not convinced they are real.
@thekingsilverado3266
@thekingsilverado3266 3 ай бұрын
@@davidpowell6098 Who do ya think China has been selling all our used recycled washers and dryers too?
@powerkingez9682
@powerkingez9682 2 ай бұрын
not to even mention the huge weakpoints in the armour they made in the turret to simply carve in the smoke grenades in it instead of simply putting them on the outside of the armour that every tank in history have
@GuPKay
@GuPKay 2 ай бұрын
Kim is just trying to compensate for somthing...
@kingvonderwelt5090
@kingvonderwelt5090 2 ай бұрын
If we learned one thing from the Ukraine war then it would be that a tank, no matter how bad it might be in comparison to our western tanks, is still a tank.
@MrMontanaNights
@MrMontanaNights 3 ай бұрын
I like how every time Russia, China, NK, etc comes out with a new piece of military kit the internet decides to critique the designs so they can go back and fix the critiques in the next iteration.
@jumpergamer1913
@jumpergamer1913 3 ай бұрын
Are you amazed that they do the basics of iteration to their BIGDILDOX9000 9th version that will cripple and destrory the homesex west, while western designs are either at 4th gen with minimal compromises or at the 6th generation in the state of the art equipament. T4 Armata might as well be considered a fairy tale instead of a tank.
@MrMontanaNights
@MrMontanaNights 3 ай бұрын
@@jumpergamer1913 I'm more amazed that they don't bother taking the information and actually putting it to use yeah. It was more a comment on the situation more than anything else.
@kenirawadi4689
@kenirawadi4689 3 ай бұрын
A very smart way to get a free consultacy.
@jumpergamer1913
@jumpergamer1913 26 күн бұрын
@@MrMontanaNights ok
@benswan9133
@benswan9133 3 ай бұрын
I preordered 5 of these when the Kickstarter was launches. They work well as dimmer/volume switches (Hue & Sonos) and even managed to get a button press to trigger a specific playlist. I got excited about all the more complicated things it might do, but quickly discovered it can't do any of them.
@temper44
@temper44 3 ай бұрын
How did you get around the sanctions to buy those tanks?
@yichlyichl4204
@yichlyichl4204 3 ай бұрын
@@temper44Don't worry about it
@benswan9133
@benswan9133 3 ай бұрын
Lmao this is very much not the video this comment was intended for
@fmjjjjn7510
@fmjjjjn7510 3 ай бұрын
💀
@amandahugankiss4110
@amandahugankiss4110 3 ай бұрын
it nearly works though. :)
@downloading01
@downloading01 2 ай бұрын
its like those dogs who barks a lot to other dogs but when the gate opens he doesnt do anything
@stevetomato1188
@stevetomato1188 2 ай бұрын
Instead of an ATGM what if its a SAM. The inability to defend against helicopters effectively is always a concern for tank crews from my experience.I know its a stretch seeing as none of them look to have any elevation but is fun to think about
@jimmy-jermz4469
@jimmy-jermz4469 Ай бұрын
Mostly not especially for Nato Doctrine. You have to control the skies before you're sending tanks and infantry in.
@surferdude4487
@surferdude4487 17 күн бұрын
When I played on the M1A1 tank simulator back in the 80s, I used AX wire guided rounds to take out helicopters. Don't know how real that was.
@nekogaming1715
@nekogaming1715 3 ай бұрын
I'm actually impressed to the fact that they produced a tank that looks modern without thinking it's capabilities is modern too
@h.a.9880
@h.a.9880 3 ай бұрын
And unlike the T-14 Atrapa, it actually managed to get through its first parade without breaking down.
@silvermix5093
@silvermix5093 3 ай бұрын
Of course it's made for show off their current tactic is just nuclear bombs and show of some fake thanks it's not like these times needs to be in war
@TheRezro
@TheRezro 3 ай бұрын
My uncle in garage can make modern looking tank. It is based on tractor, but still.
@TheRezro
@TheRezro 3 ай бұрын
@@h.a.9880 TBH T-14 is probably over-complicated but unrefined tank. M2020 is clearly just a prop.
@korana6308
@korana6308 3 ай бұрын
@@h.a.9880 Armata T14 got through its first parade just fine.
@arthurp-er1yz
@arthurp-er1yz 3 ай бұрын
IDK! Did you see his generals at the military parade? They had service metals down past the belt!!
@hckr_-gh7se
@hckr_-gh7se 3 ай бұрын
Medals*
@Sir_Godz
@Sir_Godz 3 ай бұрын
metals are correct, they are what you wear to pretend you did something@@hckr_-gh7se
@damianodonnell5844
@damianodonnell5844 3 ай бұрын
Thats because in North Korea the generals wear medals that their grand parents or great grand parents had won
@Amped4Life
@Amped4Life 3 ай бұрын
It has been this way since before you were born. If you just now saw that they wear an unholy amt of medals, you are uninformed / stupid.
@Kim_YoJong
@Kim_YoJong 3 ай бұрын
​@@damianodonnell5844👏 congratulations
@niapsoahc9336
@niapsoahc9336 2 ай бұрын
@taskandpurpose did you notice in the picture ( at 17.08) with the tank crew that 2 tanks are damaged and the tracks are visible. from right to left it is the second and the fourth tank. The second one is missing the track cover on the right and the fourth one is heavily bent and torn out on the side
@galesams4205
@galesams4205 Ай бұрын
The NVA used the T-62 in vietnam war, though not very many made it passed HUE. B co. 4th inf div. ARMOR recon.
@victorpapaavp
@victorpapaavp 3 ай бұрын
If only this new tank was a symbol of North Korea's ability to feed its population instead of launching nuclear firecrackers into the Pacific Ocean, lmao...
@Namkify
@Namkify 3 ай бұрын
If you wanna go there: - It actually is. Korea aint experiencing a (US induced) famine as of now. At the same time tho: 44 Million americans go hungry to bed every day and that despite the Dozens of Billions in Taxes being gifted to people like Elon Musk.
@robertbennett9949
@robertbennett9949 3 ай бұрын
If only the USA was a force for good in the world and it's diabetics did not have to make a choice between buying food or insulin...........
@timspiker
@timspiker 3 ай бұрын
Those soldiers look quite buff. They can't obtain that physique from being under fed. I don't think we should underestimate opponents. It is well demonstrated how underestimation can lead to defeat. Ask Ukraine.
@aleksazunjic9672
@aleksazunjic9672 3 ай бұрын
NK just sold few million shells to a certain country ... that is world greatest exporter of wheat ... Hmmm 🤔
@joshpatton757
@joshpatton757 3 ай бұрын
@@robertbennett9949 Bit outdated on that burn, Insulin is price controlled in the U.S. now, as of January of last year.
@vojtechpribyl7386
@vojtechpribyl7386 3 ай бұрын
One thing toward the turret - look at the Israeli M60 upgrades, namely Magach 7A and 7C. There is still a cast and rounded turret under that boxy shape with all of the new shape being aplique armor, so there might actually be a rounded cast turret that we know from previous DPRK tanks.
@PenskePC17
@PenskePC17 3 ай бұрын
They don't just completely replace the turrets Magach?
@apyllyon
@apyllyon 3 ай бұрын
It´s a plausibility. French and israeli did uparm shermans well into the cold war the latin american countries operated the shermans with experimental 60mm high velocty guns,as well as other models well in to the cold war, the reason was that there was large number of them and they were quickly growing obsolet, so they were dirt cheap, and in many cases USA, didn´t even want to get paid for sharing their toys. The 75mm autoloader was a gun inspired by the panther´s gun in terms of ballistic performance. Not only regional refurbishment´s of pattons were made by individual nations, but US arms industry did supply several nato and asian countries with either kit´s or fully refurbished M47´s,M48´s and M60´s during the cold war, meanwhile the soviets were not willing to supply their T-64´s outside the USSR, instead choosing to supply T-54/55,T-62 and T-72 for export´s.
@not_stardust
@not_stardust 3 ай бұрын
Adding to this, South Africa has done the same thing with the Olifant 1B and Olifant 2 which are modernized British Centurions
@vojtechpribyl7386
@vojtechpribyl7386 3 ай бұрын
@@not_stardust Indeed, but Centurion turret was far less of an egg shape.
@thekingsilverado3266
@thekingsilverado3266 3 ай бұрын
I remember Richard Deutsch of the Farmboorke regiment in Austria allegedly said that Israel and the Brits found a way to inject concrete between the mated pieces. Could be his assumptions were correct? I used to talk to the guy pretty regular but he passed away in 2021. He was a military contractor and kind of a Mentor. He said the UK did that with some obsolete tanks they mothballed for just in case purposes. To me it does sound plausible.
@FerroEquus-262
@FerroEquus-262 13 күн бұрын
North Korea: Can produce advanced Main Battle Tanks Also North Korea: Cannot produce antibiotics and food 🤣
@mytwocents777
@mytwocents777 2 ай бұрын
The absurdly tall brims of the officer's hats to make them look taller always gets me
@pilkjaer
@pilkjaer 3 ай бұрын
As long as you don't plan to use them in action, they can be as fancy and look as fierce as you want. All they need is to look shiny during the parades.
@baomao7243
@baomao7243 2 ай бұрын
Same playbook as the guys who “produced” reactive armor out of cardboard for Russia. “No way they’ll ever use this… oh, snap!”
@jsanf44373
@jsanf44373 2 ай бұрын
⁠@@baomao7243 So the military industrial complex can scam American tax dollar
@baomao7243
@baomao7243 2 ай бұрын
@@jsanf44373 “The pot calling the kettle black”
@ruzziasht349
@ruzziasht349 2 ай бұрын
Remember when the USA underestimated the Viet Cong and how very badly that ended.
@jsanf44373
@jsanf44373 2 ай бұрын
@@ruzziasht349 Your memories are bad you forgot it's endless wars to scam your guilbile tax dollar
@jmantime
@jmantime 3 ай бұрын
North Korea also designed a new Wheeled Tank Destroyer also called " M2020/2024 ", it resembles an American Strike IFV / Russian BMP-3 but with a 155mm duel purpose anti-tank / field gun and 4 ATGM systems.
@Taskandpurpose
@Taskandpurpose 3 ай бұрын
Planning on doing a video on the Stryker knock off ! That was my ride in iraq so I’m flattered they made one haha
@marcogenovesi8570
@marcogenovesi8570 3 ай бұрын
"designed" is a strong word
@TheRezro
@TheRezro 3 ай бұрын
Is it as good as Russian Terminator? (Sarcasm)
@JeRefuseDeBienPrononcerBaleine
@JeRefuseDeBienPrononcerBaleine 3 ай бұрын
@@TheRezro Probably less as the Russians have at least designed some good tanks/IFV (for the time) so they have SOME experience.
@chrisburke624
@chrisburke624 3 ай бұрын
"Designed" designed? Or like they sketched one out on a napkin because "Dat be soooo cool!" designed? ^ said with NK accent, ofcourse...
@therealspeedwagon1451
@therealspeedwagon1451 Ай бұрын
The thing about the weaker armor on the roof: they could always just place a cope cage on top of it like Russia is doing. If WWIII were to ever happen and conflict did happen in the Korean Peninsula it would be very interesting to see the cope cages attached to North Korean tanks, or maybe even the North Korean equivalent to Russia’s turtle tanks.
@catontiger
@catontiger 2 ай бұрын
5:14 not only those things listed, but also the added logistics and space required. Generally speaking, the tank’s gunner or commander would man the ATGM launcher, but with added space required in the turret, the tank (or vehicle) would need to be built with that and/or a smaller weapon in mind, such as the M3A3 Bradley IFV (Infantry Fighting Vehicle)
@arvypolanco
@arvypolanco 3 ай бұрын
Playing devil's advocate regarding the ATGM's: As mentioned, tank on tank combat is relatively rare. Having a couple of ATGMs can allow the tank to carry more HE rounds and use the expensive ATGMs for other tanks (though probably still carrying sabot, only less of them). ATGMs are quieter and harder to spot where they are fired from, and can fire from longer ranges, not to mention may hit other tanks behind cover with a top attack (assuming the missile has the capability). They might also make sense if used against other tanks with active protection, allowing a quick double tap ATGM+Sabot in an attempt to defeat the APS (depending on the APS, this may or may not be effective). ATGMs can also be used against low flying aircraft, giving the tank limited AA capability. I think ATGMs can make sense on MBT's if they are used sparingly for those niche cases. With this in mind, awkward reloading of the missiles is not such a big deal, as they can fall back to SABOT from the main cannon if they expend both missiles in combat.
@johanmetreus1268
@johanmetreus1268 3 ай бұрын
Increased HE complement was my first thought as well. The other very valid reason to add missiles is if the gun lacks in long range precision. Might be the sights, firecontrol system or the gun barrel, but either way a missile would solve that problem, leaving the shorter range engagements to the gun. A third reason is if NK has problems producing long rod APFSDS capable of reliably punch through modern armour, thus limiting them to HEAT rounds that are notoriously difficult to use at long range due to their slower speed and thus long travel times (which was the reason Soviet Union dabbled in gun launched missiles to begin with).
@Taskandpurpose
@Taskandpurpose 3 ай бұрын
I’m always willing to keep an open mind ! They could be dope as heck for all I know
@tomk3732
@tomk3732 3 ай бұрын
ATGM idea is great! Not only tank on tank combat is rare, it can be used to engage at long distances. It can be used against helicopters.
@johanmetreus1268
@johanmetreus1268 3 ай бұрын
@@Taskandpurpose could also be like the 75mm B-25 guns (Military Aviation History put up a video recently), solid reasons and flawless solution but in the end the application was so limited that it in hindsight was a waste of time and resources.
@rorythomas9469
@rorythomas9469 3 ай бұрын
The ATGMs could also allow for engaging targets at a wider depression/elevation range than the main gun, which is relevant in the very hilly Korean peninsula.
@rygull
@rygull 3 ай бұрын
I really enjoy all the humor you slip into your videos without emphasizing what you just did making it subtle. Good stuff!
@Taskandpurpose
@Taskandpurpose 3 ай бұрын
@@levelaznif the CIA asked me to Join I totally would ! Unfortunately they haven’t reached out yet :/
@klas666
@klas666 3 ай бұрын
@@Taskandpurpose Central Infantrial Averageness
@abdushmul
@abdushmul 2 ай бұрын
A tank must resemble a garage to be effective.
@MadSodaz
@MadSodaz Ай бұрын
Props for the clip of my unit in Australia 👌🤙
@kkang2828
@kkang2828 3 ай бұрын
A recent video from a major South Korean youtuber interviewed a defected North Korean engineer, saying that after the first Gulf War, Kim Jong-Il was shocked by the poor combat performance of Soviet equipment. The Supreme Leader gave an order to obtain an actual example of the M1A1 Abrams and to copy it as best as possible. According to the engineer, they did indeed succeed in getting one, and the copying work was well underway when he defected in the mid 2000s. He says that the M2020 should be the result of this 3 decades long project and is indeed based on the Abrams, with some of the more advanced(less copy-able) tech coming from China, Russia, and/or Iran.
@adamwsaxe
@adamwsaxe 3 ай бұрын
Just because you have a copy of something does not mean you can easily reverse engineer it. I'd be interested in what the defector engineer has to say about NK actually got an M1. An entire vehicle? Doubtful.
@daviddavidson2357
@daviddavidson2357 3 ай бұрын
@@adamwsaxe "Just because you have a copy of something does not mean you can easily reverse engineer it." Sidewinder missiles and the USSR would like to have a word with you. One ended up in the side of a Chinese MIG, undetonated. The official statement from the USSR was "thanks for the university course in AA missile design" NK is greatly underestimated. Same with Iran, given they got a free predator drone a while back.
@TheStacato
@TheStacato 3 ай бұрын
@@daviddavidson2357 the Predator drone is 90's technology. It's not like some cutting edge super weapon, and where has that drone lead Iran in their drone techology? Oh right yeah they're using Shahed drones that sound like flying lawnmowers powered by a turboprop engine.
@Lechuga1815
@Lechuga1815 3 ай бұрын
To be fair, they spent 30 years reverse engineering a tank that was in combat 30 years ago. While the modern Abrams may not be too different, It's still a gulf war era tank going up against the next generation. I also have a theory that the military technology that the public is aware of is 5-10+ years behind the true cutting edge of military design. All that plus the poor tank design of the East along with the reduced industrial capacity of NK means I don't think this tank is going to be a huge issue. The attached ATGM means that even if they have Abrams designs, they're still gonna make a lot of stupid tank decisions on their own.
@kkang2828
@kkang2828 2 ай бұрын
@@TheStacato Shaheds are meant to be cheap and disposable. They’re suicide attack drones, in case you haven’t noticed. Nobody, not even the US, is going to put super-high-tech stuff on a suicide attack drone. It’s hardly a worthy comparison with something like the Predator. Iran has a bunch of recon/strike drones as well, and from what I’ve seen, they seem to be more or less comparable with the early Predator models at least.
@phillramirez8323
@phillramirez8323 19 күн бұрын
The M2020 that Kim was riding was upgraded with a mini fridge and a portable microwave that's the only thing that works besides driving it😬
@cloudpandarism2627
@cloudpandarism2627 2 ай бұрын
North Korea engineers in the youtube comments: "WRITE THAT SHIAT DOWN!"
@dootanator_
@dootanator_ 3 ай бұрын
Can’t wait for this to be added to war thunder and have it’s documents leaked.
@vedat3600
@vedat3600 2 ай бұрын
Xdd but imagine if they add North Korea 💀💀💀
@hildabanes5066
@hildabanes5066 2 ай бұрын
:) what could possibly go wrong?
@markanderson4163
@markanderson4163 2 ай бұрын
lol
@Babytiguer
@Babytiguer 3 ай бұрын
Cappy never disappoints in producing the most entertaining videos to just chill, learn, and have a good laugh 😄
@Taskandpurpose
@Taskandpurpose 3 ай бұрын
Hooah ❤
@summersoldier1003
@summersoldier1003 2 ай бұрын
just casually drops 'oh they made it here' everyone is just fighting for 2nd.
@preytor4639
@preytor4639 2 ай бұрын
ATGMs offer beyond line of sight targeting as well as lock on after launch capabilities. Both features a regular tank gun is lacking, so in theory a mbt could score two hits against enemy armor without even leaving cover and being detected by the enemy.
@pbinnj3250
@pbinnj3250 3 ай бұрын
Chris, I’d watch your videos even if I were blind. Besides the information, you have a viciously hilarious and increasingly subtle sense of humor that makes me look forward to every posts. Even if you have others to help do research, only you could pull off that delivery.
@joestudebaker7726
@joestudebaker7726 3 ай бұрын
"10 years dungeon for you" had me dead ☠️😅
@Yaboidavey
@Yaboidavey 2 ай бұрын
The only good reason for the ATGM is in a situation where your main fails. Basically a gigantic sidearm 😂
@aleue
@aleue 13 күн бұрын
Tank on tank battles are always rare. When a tank shows up, officers send something to kill the tank, and don't risk losing their own tank. It is a rock paper scissors that we can trust the brass to make.
@D-DiazCousins
@D-DiazCousins 3 ай бұрын
It is possible that their tank's main gun is not capable of firing ATGMs and they have to put an ATGM launcher from the outside, the best way to fix this problem is to not rush your tank production and actually just make a better gun.
@sergeyalaev9393
@sergeyalaev9393 3 ай бұрын
Yeah...Only problem being that is a 2A46 derivative, which CAN shoot TGMs. Having an additional bolt-on ATGM system, which is a Kornet-type laser-guided launcher which is capable of HE-VT Anti-Air capabilities, Thermobaric Warhead capabilities, Tandem AT capabilities on a range from 5 to 10 km....That gives you a lot more capabilities while keeping it relatively cheap. Also, before you talk about things being "jury-rigged" and "poor", take a look on the Ukraine front and what got the Leopard, the Abrams, the T-s. The West laughed at "cope-cages mhahaha copium so hard ruzzia lose" and then what? Everyone started doing it, what do you know.
@Noname-rc8uc
@Noname-rc8uc 3 ай бұрын
External ATGM's don't have limitation of being squized through the barrel. It means they can have longer range, bigger warhead, easier way to upgrade...
@D-DiazCousins
@D-DiazCousins 3 ай бұрын
@@sergeyalaev9393 Having an unnecessary external atgm launcher creates a weak spot on the side armor, they added ERA for a reason and it may just be that the hull armor isn't enough protection, so taking up space for an atgm launcher instead of ERA will only make it another weak spot with the APS placement, kornet is good, yes. However, it will only be a logistical problem with it being external (this also applies to other external launchers other than kornet) the crew will have to add another stress on resupplying those atgms once they all get used up, also the probability that north Korea has low numbers of atgms designed for the m2020 may force them to remove it to the design completely. Ps, the wars in Ukraine and the middle east Aren't being won, one is just in an advantage than the other, in the end we are just shoving each other down. No matter how strong or well protected your war machines could be, there's no guarantee that it won't be destroyed, it is a factor of war to lose something to gain.
@Liv1nMohawk
@Liv1nMohawk 3 ай бұрын
And maybe the Armor piercing round of the tank isn't good enough to fight modern tanks. Usually North Korea recycle part design from older vehicles like the canon or put add on armor on an older tank.
@theidiotictroublemaker2281
@theidiotictroublemaker2281 3 ай бұрын
Lol what? The wested billions of dollars on a tank that can shoot atgms. Even then the gun was overly changed in coming years because of problem after problem. Meanwhile having a atgm launcher outside is better since it can help in targeting multiple targets as well as equipping higher calibre atgms
@DroneStrike1776
@DroneStrike1776 3 ай бұрын
A tank that needs an anti-tank guided missile. Defeats the purpose of what a tank's cannon is design to do.
@anrw886
@anrw886 3 ай бұрын
Not really. Tanks job since forever is for the most part to lob HE at positions. It's very weird though yeah, but it doesn't defeat the entire purpose
@nickpruyn597
@nickpruyn597 3 ай бұрын
Russia's ATGM has range overmatch over the Abrams 120mm cannon.
@haganshows
@haganshows 3 ай бұрын
No, ATGMs are used for long distance combat and low flying aircraft.
@lordyoda607
@lordyoda607 3 ай бұрын
Lol, tanks basically never get the chance to shoot sabot rounds at other tanks anyway.
@nathanrigger15
@nathanrigger15 3 ай бұрын
ATGMs are better for moving targets and helicopters, have more range and accuracy than shells, and aren't affected by velocity drop off from range like most shells because they have warheads instead of kinetic penetrators and can carry a larger payload
@froshure5212
@froshure5212 Күн бұрын
4:21 lmao that's the game Simple Planes
@Thebibs
@Thebibs 2 ай бұрын
I hear that those new tanks have a neat blue neon light underneath them , for when they are driving around the blocks, showing off
@dennishou6399
@dennishou6399 2 ай бұрын
M2020: a repurposed bob Semple with the maneuverability of the kursk submarine, the protectiveness of the m113, the fire rate of the yamato, caliber of that one Japanese light tank from ww2, and the blessing from our great leader Kimmy. perfection.
@alexorehowski3387
@alexorehowski3387 2 ай бұрын
$10 million Abrams tanks are taken out by $500 RPG-7. It does not matter what tanks are built of today, they are just too expensive for any real combat. Small drones and unmanned launching platforms are the future, just like terminators.
@GuPKay
@GuPKay 2 ай бұрын
​ @alexorehowski3387 thats always been the case, old tanks could be taken out by cheap explosives too, perhaps since you are such the strategic military genius why doesn't the government have you remove tanks from combat?
@alexorehowski3387
@alexorehowski3387 2 ай бұрын
@@GuPKay Says a person with girl's anime avatar. Dumb.
@therealspeedwagon1451
@therealspeedwagon1451 Ай бұрын
It’s also made with Kiminium. Which is like glorious Stalinium but with the blessing of our Great Respected Supreme Leader Kim Jong Un.
@GuPKay
@GuPKay Ай бұрын
@@therealspeedwagon1451 its basically shitty stalinium
@lore.keeper
@lore.keeper 3 ай бұрын
There was an old PC game called "Army Men" where you fight with little plastic soldiers and tiny toy equipment. This is the first thing that came to my mind when I saw this LOL
@aleksazunjic9672
@aleksazunjic9672 3 ай бұрын
This is the video about NK army, not about US army, dude 😋
@otectus2187
@otectus2187 3 ай бұрын
@@aleksazunjic9672 You're joking, right? Comparing NK to the US in terms of military might and technological advancement. What a joke lmao.
@aleksazunjic9672
@aleksazunjic9672 3 ай бұрын
@@otectus2187 Well, US army is now full of little plastic "men" i.e. "persons" , with sensitivity training and high heels 🤣😆
@rambo-cambo3581
@rambo-cambo3581 3 ай бұрын
Army Men RTS was gold
@pflaffik
@pflaffik 3 ай бұрын
@@otectus2187NK defeated US Army once before. You may call it a cease fire but we all know why the Korean war stopped. USA lost. Thats all there was to it. Then they lost in Vietnam, once again a loss to a primitive enemy. Then latest they lost to Taliban, a bunch of bearded guys who are afraid of little girls in school, what is your point here??
@re4796
@re4796 2 ай бұрын
I love how this video immediately turned into propaganda in the end
@budsgalore3786
@budsgalore3786 11 күн бұрын
It looks like a Lego mash-up of what would happen if an M1 and a Bradley had a baby.
@SrbijaGaleb
@SrbijaGaleb 3 ай бұрын
It is possible that the ATGM launcher was added so that it could achieve standoff with potential enemies. ATGM’s usually have longer range than a tank’s main gun, so standoff would be possible with that weapon system.
@vizender
@vizender 3 ай бұрын
Most missiles will have ranges of about 3.5-4km. Most modern APFSDS fired from western MBTs should be able to deal with Russian tanks from 3+km away with their modern anti-era tips, so the distances are actually somewhat similar, if we consider the armor to be on similar level for the mbt2020. European countries are also installing new fire and forget ATGMs on their IFVs with range of 5+km like the AKERON and spike missiles, which would be the bane of tanks on long range engagements. So while the ATGM might look like a good idea on paper, I think it’s uses are still pretty limited.
@IonorRea
@IonorRea 3 ай бұрын
@@vizender Smoothbore guns using fin-stabilized ammunition aren't as accurate as rifled barrels using spin-stabilized ammunition like British 120mm HESH. So, over longer ranges of 4km or more, smoothbores aren't especially accurate, not to mention that you need to wait 2 seconds for a 120mm APFSDS round from M1 Abrams to hit a target 5km away which will likely miss a target going at high speed over rough terrain, while ATGM can constantly update trajectory and thus it's plausible to hit even slow airborne targets like helicopters or low flying drones which is why you got smart guided munition on modern tanks like Israeli Merkva MK4 or South Korean K2, not to mention beyond visual range wire-guided missiles on IFVs like latest versions of CV90 with Trophy APS that can kill your fancy but obsolete M1A2 Abrams without active ballistic protection from behind a hill by top attack or even by an insurgent using cheap modified civilian drone...
@vizender
@vizender 3 ай бұрын
@@IonorRea France advertise that they can hit a target moving at over 40ph when they themselves move at that speed over 2km away. From interviews of crew commander they also claim that, with an APFSDS they are able to hit in an area of a disk with a diameter of about 50cm from 4km away. Modern FCS and rods can still be very precise at such distances
@Taskandpurpose
@Taskandpurpose 3 ай бұрын
It’s a good point ! Personally I don’t think ranges over 100km are likely in Korea geography , it’s not the desert . Not sure you’d need more range there , maybe in Iraq geography .
@DavidGirling
@DavidGirling 3 ай бұрын
But what is the point of anything long range in a country like North Korea which is mostly rough mountains with steep sided winding valleys? To use range they would need to place the tanks on the mountain peaks which would leave them as sitting ducks.
@ShurkMan413
@ShurkMan413 3 ай бұрын
For the tanks having ATGMs, one other explanation could be they aren't confident that their FCS is capable of matching or beating M1/K2 FCS in terms of first round hit probability at range, so similar to the logic of gun/missile hybrids in the 60's and 70's, they slapped on an ATGM to cover off on the "short" range envelope with the main cannon and for things they deem in excess of the cannon's effective range, they have at least a pair of missiles on tap.
@4411825
@4411825 3 ай бұрын
False!
@hermes7587
@hermes7587 3 ай бұрын
If ATGMs on tanks would have any tactical value actual army would have already deployed these. I am quite sure that these "ATGM" launchers on this North Korean "tank" are just mock-ups. The econimic capabilities of North Korea and the military capababiites they claim to have do not match at all.
@4schitzangiggles
@4schitzangiggles 2 ай бұрын
The ATGM can engage out to 10+km. What tank main gun can reachnout that far? Iirc theybcan also engage aircraft/helos and because its wire guided, good lucknwith coubtermeasures because they wont be spoofed by flares, chaff or ECM
@gavinjenkins899
@gavinjenkins899 2 ай бұрын
Seems like it makes the most sense to me that they don't believe their darts can pen certain potential enemies (possibly due to the gun being made of tofu dreg), and the TOW is a backup. It might not HAVE more than 2 rounds, if you're not supposed to use it as a first choice.
@rorypotatochip1373
@rorypotatochip1373 3 ай бұрын
When you can’t feed anyone, who are you fighting??? 🤣🤣🤣
@jimbomoosio2184
@jimbomoosio2184 3 ай бұрын
A tank that has not seen combat designed by committee with an infallible leader, what could possibly go wrong?
@ahmadloai2378
@ahmadloai2378 3 ай бұрын
Keep the " not seen combat" out of this .. we seen how "combat proven" Western tanks are. Nothing survive in a war specially when you come against a determined enemy with enough capabilities to fight back
@devildolphin2102
@devildolphin2102 3 ай бұрын
@@ahmadloai2378 Except our tanks Will keep the Crew alive. Russian tanks throw the crew and turret in the air.
@AbuHajarAlBugatti
@AbuHajarAlBugatti 3 ай бұрын
@@Pesky_Anon Its just a western hating, russia cheerleading muslim/arab. None special
@Kim_YoJong
@Kim_YoJong 3 ай бұрын
​@@AbuHajarAlBugatti👏
@Kim_YoJong
@Kim_YoJong 3 ай бұрын
Your dissent has been noted, gentlemen. ✍️
@enigma4430
@enigma4430 27 күн бұрын
you know its a great tank when the barrel shakes and bounces around as it slowly drives down a flat paved parade road.
@banquo60615
@banquo60615 2 күн бұрын
Kim Jong Un just made himself into the Michael Dukakis of North Korea.
@patrikekman5969
@patrikekman5969 3 ай бұрын
Good video, great level of details, I'm just amazed you are able to present everything so well.
@thekingsilverado3266
@thekingsilverado3266 3 ай бұрын
He did not present how it will stand up against Bidens new EV tanks that shoot them giant pink dildos and glitter bombs.
@robinkelly1770
@robinkelly1770 3 ай бұрын
Actually the bright feathers on birds are to attract mates, not scare predators. One has to wonder what type of mate a tank is trying to attract.. 😅😅😅
@Jeth1093
@Jeth1093 2 ай бұрын
This looks like one of those Movie prop tanks where they convert a tank to look like another tank for the film, this one seems like a T-72 tha has been converted to an Abrams
@Joelontugs
@Joelontugs 22 күн бұрын
I wonder how much extra points you get if your the one that cries the hardest when you see him and your in the army lol
@eruantien9932
@eruantien9932 2 ай бұрын
Missiles on MBTs is a "common" thing for North Korea. Chonma-215, Chonma-216 and Songun-915 have all been seen mounting MANPADS (SA-7 for the -215, and SA-16 for the other two), and the -216 and -915 with Busae-3 and -5 respectively. It's not a good idea, but NK procurement seems to like how it looks.
@ThoughtlessDestiny
@ThoughtlessDestiny 3 ай бұрын
I like to think that the tank gunner optics are dude with a periscope passing hand drawings to the Gunner below him.
@cruisinguy6024
@cruisinguy6024 3 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂 I will now also adopt this view of their tanks
@davidkanengieter
@davidkanengieter 3 ай бұрын
A kaleidoscope. To aim, rotate the lens till the top of the images all touch.
@Artificial-Stupidity
@Artificial-Stupidity 29 күн бұрын
Sooo... did North Korea just make a tank that looks like an Abrams, so that US tankers won't know who's friendly and who isn't? 😂
@briantan6264
@briantan6264 Ай бұрын
Kim jong un's logic admiral general aladeen, "anti tank missile on a tank is scary, normal tanks puts a smile on the faces of the enemy, they will think its a cute little puppy who is attacking them"
@arthurp-er1yz
@arthurp-er1yz 3 ай бұрын
HEYY!! I GOTTA LET YOU KNOW. I WATCHed a handful of channels with military Info, with older guys, most of which are prior military pilots. But, you do a really good job! You give accurate info, even include/explain,vital side notes, where relevant. I've been following you for a pretty good while now. Never commented. Thanks again!
@dirtyp.132
@dirtyp.132 3 ай бұрын
Peacocks use those feathers to attract a mate, they don’t scare away predators
@Mortarion-xt9wp
@Mortarion-xt9wp 3 ай бұрын
They gotta keep Russia and China don't they? Edit: I am fairly sure that it's the males who have those feathers to attract the females.
@Shoelessjoe78
@Shoelessjoe78 3 ай бұрын
Maybe that's the plan... If they can attract and mate with an Abrams. They might be able to breed a real modern tank. 4d chess glorious leader always one step ahead of the West
@yowtfputthemaskbackon9202
@yowtfputthemaskbackon9202 2 ай бұрын
@@Mortarion-xt9wp are you, sir, implying that vladimir putin and glorious leader xi jingping are infact, femboys?
@doggonemess1
@doggonemess1 Ай бұрын
14:30 Tank on tank combat is so rare in fact that the video clip shown is two Bradleys taking out a Russian T-90(?) with their 25mm cannons. XD
@flyingspirit3549
@flyingspirit3549 2 ай бұрын
Excellent presentation on an area where very few of us have any reliable knowledge.
@neilgibbs3880
@neilgibbs3880 3 ай бұрын
Thanks Cappy now I’m worried about “barrel droop” 😂😂😂
@Taskandpurpose
@Taskandpurpose 3 ай бұрын
See a doctor if you notice signs of barrel droop
@leonelvaa3169
@leonelvaa3169 3 ай бұрын
at 4:22 the game simple games was used to show a 3d diagram of the tank its cool how the community for that game makes so many vehicles
@r0cketplumber
@r0cketplumber 2 ай бұрын
Most honest description evar: "Ryu Kyung-Su is the North Korean defense industry plant that I just mispronounced." Comedy gold.
@lunkholhou
@lunkholhou Ай бұрын
😂😂😂 tractor parts 😂😂😂 oh god!!! You made my day brother 😂 thank you
@davestier6247
@davestier6247 3 ай бұрын
From Raytheon to ambulance chasers, the ads just keep getting better 😂😂
@liamreich8486
@liamreich8486 3 ай бұрын
Says you with 1.5million subscribers......
@gmoney8087
@gmoney8087 3 ай бұрын
For real
@cruisinguy6024
@cruisinguy6024 3 ай бұрын
I’ve noticed lately the ambulance chasers have really been flooding KZfaq with their sponsored adds
China's NEW Giant Infantry Vehicle is a Nightmare
22:30
Task & Purpose
Рет қаралды 3,4 МЛН
What Happened to China's "Apache Attack Helicopter" ?
21:52
Task & Purpose
Рет қаралды 2,6 МЛН
50 YouTubers Fight For $1,000,000
41:27
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 169 МЛН
Heartwarming moment as priest rescues ceremony with kindness #shorts
00:33
Fabiosa Best Lifehacks
Рет қаралды 37 МЛН
تجربة أغرب توصيلة شحن ضد القطع تماما
00:56
صدام العزي
Рет қаралды 57 МЛН
Red❤️+Green💚=
00:38
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 76 МЛН
Why Korean Army Artillery is the Best in the World
19:48
Task & Purpose
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН
How U.S Forces Pulverized Iran’s Navy
22:08
Task & Purpose
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
Oshkosh Defense unveils first-ever silent drive hybrid electric JLTV
2:00
Oshkosh Corporation
Рет қаралды 35 М.
North Korea - Faces of an Alienated Country
21:55
Get.factual
Рет қаралды 2 МЛН
Dictatorship, Paranoia, Famine: Welcome to North Korea!
54:18
Best Documentary
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
Britain's New Tank is Legitimately Insane
21:05
Task & Purpose
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
China's Gatling Missile Air Defense is a Nightmare
18:45
Task & Purpose
Рет қаралды 701 М.
Why Ukraine’s Taking the Turtle Tank Seriously
18:22
Task & Purpose
Рет қаралды 852 М.
50 YouTubers Fight For $1,000,000
41:27
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 169 МЛН