Watch This Next! The Future is pretty fked kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mMldn7eYp56qlmw.html Check out the Arc cards I used: As a retail affiliate, I am paid a percentage of qualifying purchases at the expense of the retailer. 💎 Arc A770 16GB - newegg.io/nc644e2d2a 💎 Arc A750 - newegg.io/ncccf517f6 💎 Arc A580 - newegg.io/ncd1ad6c1a 💎 Arc A380 - newegg.io/nc61a41f4

I adopted ARC upon launch and the journey has been interesting and fun despite the challenges. I knew there were going to be some rough patches so i stuck specifically with DX12 titles and used Intel report a problem link whenever i encountered issues. Intel gave me a number of occasions to work one on one with engineers and even do some live screenshares so they could observe my experiences live. All in all, i am EXTREMELY happy with the the A770's that we have here and look forward to battlemage when it launches. Ultimately what attracts me to these products is that being a 32+ year custom PC builder, it is so refreshing to have a genuinely new and refreshing product to work with versus the very old and stale Radeon and GeForce branding. No to mention that the price creep from those 2 brands is just beyond the pale of comprehension which is majority based in shareholder greed. From here and based on what i have experience so far with ARC, i see no personal reason to by another Radeon or GeForce product again for the foreseeable future. I personally just can't justify their ridiculous prices for an occasional pastime.

I have been saying this for the past three years. We have no choice!! Nvidia no longer cares about the gaming market . We only have AMD and Intel. So, intel need to put more emphasis on their Gaming Graphics. There is no way either AMD or Intel will catch Nvidia in AI. So, the Gaming market that Nvidia left in the trash, is there for the taking. Someone needs to step and take it.

Intel Arc is very important to the future of mainstream PC gaming. Nvidia have shown that they are no longer interested in the low and mid range, only the $1000 and up cards. In fact they're not even particularly interested in GPUs at all at the moment because of AI. AMD are incapable of competing at the high end so have a virtual monopoly in the sub $500 market. Steam hardware surveys seem to suggest that for the vast majority of gamers, sub $400 is the sweet spot so if Intel can be truly competitive here they could get a reasonable slice of that market. Looking forward to Battlemage but even more so Celestial & Druid. 🤞🏻

As an AMD convert from Intel, honestly, we need them. Nvidia, in their dominance, has treated gamers, their core audience that is responsible for their dominance, like absolute trash.

I love my A750. The issue I ran into was a pixelazation of planet atmospheric effects in orbit for one games that I play called star trek online. That issue appears to have been resolved. That same issue was also present in no man's sky and it too appears to have been resolved

A former anti consumer monopolist like intel is now our only hope in the GPU market. Things went downhill hard in the past few years.

I'd like to see Intel become the third big player in the GPU market.

I already bought 6 cards: 2x sparkle a310 eco(1slot Av encoder), 2x 380, 2x 770. I did my part!

I use a sparkle a770 for vr and I gotta say I really enjoy the performance. Seeing that I play vrchat that 16gb of vram comes in handy big time

I got an arc card when I built my computer earlier this year. The only issues I've had frame drops in would be when messing with shader settings in Minecraft Java, and spamming particles in Dungeon Defenders 9(Though it was still playable). Overall I like my purchase of my A770 and would be inclined to recommend it to other people who need a new graphics card.

As an AMD guy, I've been praying for Intel to succeed, and as an XTX owner, have been hoping to be able to switch to Battlemage if performance is comparable. Because ultimately, I'm competition first and foremost.

Arc had many advantages like AV1 encoding support in programs like Handbrake right out of the gate. AV1 is an absolute gamechanger. Nvidia only added support for it in May 2024 despite the 40 series having at least one AV1 encoder. Since their release in 2022, they've only enabled AV1 support for OBS.

I actually bought an A770 LE; had it since launch month or so. The improvements have been very welcome, and it's not so far away from being in an ideal situation imho. Once the DX11/DX12 rework is rolled out as it was hinted to in Gamers Nexus' 2024 revisit, I have a feeling the A770 will be one of the best modern fine wine GPUs out there.

I'm rooting for Intel

I have the A750 from Intel. The card has a few issues. Idle power draw is still insanely high even after enabling Native Power management in the BIOS per Intel guideline. However, the GPU has been very good at games I play. Most games I play are DX12 or just aren't that intense. I also do a fair amount of video transcoding and here it excels in Handbrake. I often get 20:1 ratios when transcoding.

Just upgraded to an Acer BiFrost Arc A770 16GB from my Vega 64 3 days ago. I was honestly worried that I was making a terrible mistake, but it's currently £230 at Currys which is an amazing deal for a GPU with 16GB of VRAM. Obviously haven't spent much time with it, but so far I'm very, very pleased with it. I'm addicted to the Resident Evil 4 remake and it runs like a dream on it. You can crank the textures all the way up which makes the game use almost 15GB of VRAM and there's no issue. I have had stutter in Overwatch 2 after switching to it. It's not common and doesn't last long; it's probably around 4 seconds every 3 matches or so. I play it casually and not that often so it's not something I mind too much, but that'd be a deal breaker for a lot of people. I think esports titles should be the #1 priority honestly, as those titles are always popular and the players tend to be the most vocal about performance issues. I'm just happy the card is far more stable than I thought it'd be. No random BSODs or black screens and great performance in the titles I've played. I would have felt sad going for the RX 7600 or RTX 4060 over this as those cards simply have much less "GPU" for your buck if you know what I mean. The A770 having 16GB of VRAM on a 256 bit bus and plenty of cores for ray tracing and AI upscaling just make it feel so premium despite it being so cheap. It should age beautifully.

The Arc control windows was unresponsive for months until I found a post on reddit that indetified the issue to be with ASUS AI noise cancellation technology. I disabled those audio devices, and everything worked normally.

Now I'm curious if DX9 games would perform better on a Linux based OS with proton.

I have the Asrock A770 you were showing in the video and it's been great in the last 6 months I've had it. One of the main reasons I bought it was for video editing/recording and it's very good at this. It also does well in games at 1440p. I'd actually call the drivers pretty optimized now because I mostly play niche jrpgs but haven't had any driver issues with them (for example, Scarlet Nexus and Persona 4 Golden work great, and those games, especially Scarlet Nexus, aren't anywhere near mainstream titles). I know I'll be recommending Arc gpus to others.

When I had a 6700XT I prefered XESS for upscaling instead of FSR. Now, on a 7900XTX, I dont use upscalers, but if I needed a a card in that price segment, Intel Arc would be a serious competitor, especially for rendering and in terms of raw hardware/potential. Im mostly impressed of how far they got in such a short time with they driver support and Im still curious how the battlemage wil perform and for what price.

If intell has it dialed in by the time I build my next PC or need a upgrade I will be converting

My guess is that corporate greed bit their backs because the higher-ups didn't let the developers and engineers do what had to be done. You just can't afford to make this kind of mistake when entering a market that's been controlled by two companies for decades. Seeing just how well their cards perform now, they had a ton of potential to be major competitors, but that all went down the drain with a hundred billion dollars and one train-wreck of a launch.

I have the A770 and it has only gotten better with time. I really only play World of Warships, but I had issues in the start. Now it is solid. I had figured it wouldn't take Intel long to work things out. I'm looking forward to the next level of Intel gpu's!

*Thank you!* 🙏🏼 🤗 I own the VERY A770 you had in front of you during the video (I'm a dyed in the wool *ASRock* fanboi and _I don't care who knows it!_ 😊), but I have yet to install it because I'm working on 4 different builds simultaneously (all with ASRock 600 series motherboards 😁) and my focus has been on speccing them all out, grabbing the individual components whenever they go on sale, and then paying my credit card balance back down (so I can grab more Stuff™ 😆). Soon (hopefully during July) I'll be completing this first (A770) build (the case I'm using for it should be arriving next week, along with an AIO and some extra case fans), but in the meantime I'll be lying in wait for the *Prime Day* sales so I can snatch up an (ASRock) AMD GPU (probably a 7800XT or 7900GRE) for one of the other builds - but I *WILL* be snatching up Intel's _very first_ Xe2 (a.k.a. Battlemage 🧙🏼‍♂) offering when they drop later this year. If it all possible (and I'm sure it will be), it's going to be an _ASRock_ product. I like your style and manner of presentation, and I _really_ appreciate that you've been doing this series of videos. 👍🏼 Please keep up the great work! Stay safe & be well. 🖖🏼

I bought the A770 at launch knowing that the drivers would not be optimal for at least a year after release. I have been building pc's for a very long time (35 years plus) and so I have seen the early days of all the gpu makers and Intel started out like AMD and NVIDIA with teething issues, no difference, but they kept at it and now the card is starting to see the kind of performance that everyone has come to expect from Intel. Today's PC builders are a lot different from when I began, back then computing was a hobbyist culture were things didn't just work out of the box, it took time and a ton of effort to get a computer running, those days are long gone which in a way is real shame.😊

It's kind of funny that over time it's actually getting harder to find Intel Arc cards now. Like, I wanted to buy a Low Profile A380 just for AV1 encoding and I can't find one from my usual sources which is really wierd and nice.

Just curious to know for Sure; But is the game: 'Robo Cop Rogue City' optimized for the Intel Arc? Because there is an 'Intel Arc Splash Screen' as the Game is Launching.

I got a new computer at work. Needed a video card because I use 3 monitors. I dont game on it, but I need good video for opening and navigating large blueprint documents. I got the 750 when it was first out, because it was cheap and powerful. I was terrified of it for a while because of so many issues people were having. I never had any problems with it. I then got a 770 for home. That one ended up in a box, replaced by a 7800 XT.

I like the idea of both Intel and AMD making their own CPUs and GPUs, owners can make full team blue or team red computers and ignore the greedy green

I bought one for my sisters rig. She’s mainly dx12. Works pretty much all the time with small glitches here and there. She games on a 1080p ultra wide @60hz. The a770 doesn’t even sweat.

I think their most expensive mistake would be the self destructing 13th and 14th gen CPUs

To be honest, i'm very happy with my A750 ORC OC. I play Battlefield 2043 @ 1440/ medium to high @60-80 fps CS2 is now also stable @1440 @120 fps medium/high Games like Age of Empires 4 and etc. run just amazing. So i'am happy as a user. Especially for the price of 220 euro I got it for. In lots of games it goes above RX7600 which costs 310+ euros On TimeSpy (3D Mark) I get 12000+ points. The GPU is powerful, the drivers are hit and miss, but generally they release updates once or twice per month with fairly nice improvements. So, nothing to complain about.

I’m thinking of buying one for my new pc build gaming at 1440p but I’m hesitating on this arc770 gpu or with the rtx 4070 super can someone help me decide please thanks or should i keep my 1080ti and wait for improvements on the arc770

Always been a ATi/AMD fan and they have gone through the same process. (I used to mod ati/amd drivers to push the drivers for more performance and make them work throughout their while range of cards “all in one package” before they did it them selves) and it took team red 2 decades (same for team green by the way). If anything I’m pleased to see what Intel is doing and within the timeline they are doing it.

I love my Arc 770, and it's installed in an Intel NUC 12 extreme i9. Performant and silent. Drivers updates come very regularly.

Hi, could you put this card up against a quadro, could be a great alternative for a content creator?

I got an A750 in March ( $200 new ) to do my first PC build in over 10 years. I run Linux and mainly Blender. The only issues I had was when Blender updates needed an updated driver, I reported it to Intel and they got a new driver out in a few days sometimes in hours. It was a huge step up from a Dell desktop + GTX 1650. I don't do much gaming on it just 0AD , Warzone 2100, and openttd. Most gaming I do is on PlayStation.

I bought my ASRock Phantom Gaming Arc a770 16gb oc card in august of 2023 for a product review and its been a good choice since day one, so Mutch so that I decided to build an intel balanced build around it a few months ago and glad I did.

im running an a380 currently and have had zero problems. i play mostly single player offline games.

Pulled a trigger on used Arc a770 Acer Bifrost and so far so good.

I'm watching this video with Arc A380 LP

Have an A770, Arc drivers are in a lot better place now. Still have issues with Arkham Knight and Kingdoms of Amalur Re-Reckoning, but that's about it out of the slate of games I usually play. Everything else from Fallout to Assassin's Creed generally plays well.

intel was the only big company that could still come out with such a good performer. if they didnt have igpu experience it would've been a waste from the start.

I bought a Sparkle A770 Titan about 2 months ago and have been running it on Linux. It's performing fine with one issue that may likely turn it into a deal breaker for gaming. There has been mixed reviews from people saying the HDMI ports suffer from random small blackouts but it seemingly did not affect the DP's. This card has this issue on every single port, HDMI or DP. Playing a game where death or quick reaction time matters, a random blackout for up to 3 seconds is enough to ruin everything for you. The blackouts are not extremely common, but they do occur a handful of times a day. This is not safe to game on for me personally.

i use an arc a770 and it has served me well I do both Gaming and editing and with gaming its pretty good with no problems with the games I play (skyrim, Tf2, Madden, Fortnite city skylines, cookie clicker, poker night at the inventory, civ 6 sims 4 and minecraft) my only issues come with editing where it seems intel has not worked out issues with gpu accceleraton giving constant artifacts when exporting in this style. The workaround is easy and just using the cpu for exporting, but that means i cant use fancy editing techniques like motion transitons making my edits sometimes look cheaper.

Looking at their 13 and 14th gen issues, Arc might not have been their most expensive mistake.

My Asus x370f motherboard and 3800x ryzen CPU through bios and chipset updates support rebar. Zen 2 works too. Not just Zen 3 and above.

I got a arc card at Christmas of 2022 and was ok but when i got a new pc and used the a770 le it was so much better and the stability is much better. When i first got it i have artifacts when playing video but not in game i have not gotten any artifacts in many months

It's been about a year since I built a pc strictly for the A750. Now it's July 2024 and I wouldn't dream of pulling that card out of that machine. It's an 11th gen i5 and with the A750 it runs very well. I use it mainly for testing my Steam Library games.

I switched from Nvidia to Intel A770 16 GB and love it. Note that I only use DX12 and for Flight Simulator 2020 only. Ready to purchase the upcoming Intel Battlemage GPU.

alright equivalent would be smth like i5 10400f + rtx3060ti or arc770, and i can assure you if those are minimum spec lowest games will look like, maybe ac origins very high w raytracing enabled

Im gald for people who just want test out things with these cards, but i just want things to work. Oh and what im missing in this video is, the mentioning of power consumptionm, as i sse it, they are not that effiicent, i for sure hope they will be in the future

I was tempted to go for a750 although the cost went up in my area around the time the rx 7600 came out Making it worse in terms of price to performance. My cousins GPU died so he has my rx 7600 which was my guest PC card, currently have no GPU in that PC still tempted to pick one up. Edit the a750 is now really cheap less than a 3050 6gb or rx 6600

I have used a sparkle a770 16gb with an AMD cpu for around 2 months, and so far, it works great on Windows and Linux with zero issues.

I'm still waiting for them to officially support VR. In any other scenario, the GPU rocks, but on OpenXR/Vulkan API related things, the driver has missing instructions, but the capability is there.

I got a A750 LE for $284 AUD, absolute bargain and i'm super happy with my card, but as you went through that list of games not supported well, it occurred to me that i luckily don't play any of those games. :D Thank Odin!

running a a770 on a old x99 xeon e5 2695 v3, and i love it

What about Linux support, did they address that.

Im in on Battlemage. I wana give intel a try and im realy interessting to see what the b980 can do :)

I have had both green and red cards but Intel stepping into the space has been one of the most exciting things to happen in the pc tech space since I started building. I am looking forward to their next generation and what it will mean for the market.

I would have bought one last week for a new PC I'm building if they'd be close to the competition in power consumption.

Would you rather sell silicon for 2K or 40K?

You're underselling just how much of a budget banger the Arc cards are, especially if you do streaming or video encoding.

I got a770 sparkle over clocked it to 2640mhz I well over 60fps onforza motorsport1440p and 4k 60fps or more

I have been using a750 for about 6 months. If it helps people, I paired it with a 12600kf processor. In these 6 months; I played black&desert online, path of exile, dota 2, pubg, gta san andreas, hitman 2, frostpunk, albion online and ghost of tsushima games completely without any problems and with ultra settings.

Arrow lake plus battlemage should be a great combination.

This was a good video, thank you. I've been considering an ARC A580 to swap out my RX-6600, and give my RX-6600 to our daughter. She's running a Radeon 5700, and her room gets HOT. I run the 6600 and it's cool. My CPU is a 5600X, daughter is running a 5600. I could get an A580 and give my 6600 to my daughter, the 5700 can then be sold I guess.

I got my A750 May-23 and all mayor issues were essentielly gone, sure I can't get the extra boost from 200 to 300FPS in 1080p in all games, but I can go to 1440p and keep the same FPS in those games. With new drivers it's only getting better, gaining 10% FPS in a couple of games every month. I got the LE version and it's silent as a mouse, but it does draw some power, especially when overclocked to compete with the 7600 & 4060. Raytracing & upscaling it's rivaling Nvidia, the A750 actually beats the 4060 in 1440p in some titles, probably due to it's 256-bit bus.

I have an Acer Predator Bifrost A770 16GB. Amazing card. Handles Helldivers 2 and War Thunder like a champ

I bought an a750 and though I had some issues with it I had a good experience with it and would recommend either the 580 750 or 770 to anybody trying to build a new PC on a budget it's not really worth spending 800 buck on an invidia card when cheaper options perform better

I bought my Arc A750 for 170€ and put it on my remodeled computer 9 months ago. I bought it just to test how Intel worked with a view to perhaps buying or at least having among the alternatives to their Battlemage... ironically it works so well, that I don't know if I'll buy a Battlemage or wait for a Celestial. So it was already working very well, because Intel's work was extensive, but I have to admit that in these 9 months, it has also been intensive, and the card performs better with each update. Its big problem is that games mostly do not use XeSS technology as it happens with Dlss and FSR (although this one is honestly worse, than XeSS at least, it is an alternative when it is not implemented). So although XeSS is a better solution than FSR to act as Super Scaling for any graphics card, let alone XMX mode for graphics with XeSS hardware, the reality is that Intel's real limit is still in the game developers who implement it. Perhaps with the Windows 24H2 version, this will change as games call up the windows libraries and they use the most successful solution, but for now, the introduction of XeSS is the most serious issue that Intel has to tackle. Not only for the sake of the Arc, but also for their future Battlemage.

think dx12/vulkan optimisation are more on developers side; not much on hardware vendors; unlike older dx versions

I run a A750 on a Ryzen 7 5700, I usually play single player games and have had really no issues. I would get some slow down and some artifacts in the beginning but they were resolved rather quickly and being I started with PC gaming back in 1987 this is how most of the cards on the market started out. ATI didn't just make a card and it be the best on the market it took a couple of years with the Rage chips, if you go back and look a lot of the first gen Rage were used in servers and not as gaming GPU. Nvidia hit it out of the park with the TNT line, and is one of the reasons we don't have 3dFX any more along with a lot of others, but they too did have a lot of bumps on the way.

Intel Arc has a lot of potential. My hope is that more AIB partners, like Sapphire or XFX or Gigabyte, might start working with Intel to offer different versions of Intel's graphics cards.

i was an team green 100% before the intel Arc but i am now a team Blue and looking forward to the new releases .. my hope for intel is to release a card that knocks on the door of Nvidia and Radeon and forces them to stop hicking the prices so that they become more competitive , as people what and need graphics card but can't afford 2 - 3k for a card .. i will be buying the next team blue

We downplay AMDs hold on the APU based gaming market with these talks, just like Intel and AMD is behind in the dedicated GPU market It also doesn't seem like Intel and Nvidia won't catch up with APUs which is all narrowing Intel's reach

My first gaming pc was a Arc A770 LE I'd say its well worth the value

they should not only focus on gamming, but also in creative and engineering application performance. being a student both are really important. they got the pricing and the potential for future improvement in performance(they already proved that ) which amd and nvdia are lacking.

Bruh it's CS2 now which is based on DX11

The translation analogy with emulation is not correct. Playing PS3 on PC, means a program that completly emulates a entirely different hardware architecture on software. What Intel did is somethiong similar WINE does on Linux, is a layer that reads the calls and translate them into something understandable and it can be as fast as native. Steam Deck does this through proton.

A mist effect in Wolfenstien New Order tanked my A730m What a garbage occurance.

Gotta break that Nvidia chokehold honestly, getting that Sparkle A380 for an ITX build with sober optimism

For me the only downside to ARC now is the power consumption compared to performance. If Battlemage can deliver more fps and much better efficiency, then I'll view it as a viable alternative option.

They better pull a rabbit out of the hat with Battlemage, and their next gen CPUs. Given how issue plagued 13th and 14th gen i9s have been.

I can't wait for Battle mage

Totally surreal to see Intel, who used to be totally anti-consumer with their CPU's for nearly a decade, (with only 4 cores and hardly any significant performance improvements), until AMD Ryzen launched, be touted as the pro-consumer alternative for graphics cards now. But if Battlemage comes out strong for the mainstream, with price to performance, I'll be trying out team Blue.

I would love to continue messing with my A770, but when I got my 7900XT I upgraded my PSU and it no longer has a 6 pin sadly. ARC is defintely good for budget gamers and even streamers. Intel had AV1 support before AMD and Nvidia. Strangely Nvidia was the last to implement it into OBS and even more strange they have the most stability issues and bugs with AV1. Both Intel and AMD seem to have solid implementations there from some of my own testing.

You should say paid promotion if youre sponsored

I'm prolly gonna finish my all amd build, but when battlemage settles on the market, I'll probably go intel for my upgrade at this rate.

I have bought 2 Arc A770 and 1 Arc A 580. They seem to be the best of mid terar cards. The A770 16gb have been good cards. i hope i helped Intel. The A580 I gave away and do noy knoe hoe iy eill nr udrf in build I did for My granddaughter.

The HUGE CAVEAT for the Intel Arc cards is they are supporting only games with DirectX 12, any previous other game cannot run properly on those cards.

This video aged like a milk in just a month. AMD does better in GPU power effiency, Integrated gpu, and in CPU stability being in the industry for a long time doesn't mean Intel does it better they're still greedy AF now their cpus are dying here and there.

Intel Arc Xe2 Battlemage looks very promising. Xe2 is one micro architecture that scales from Low Power Gaming (Xe2-LPG) for iGPUs to High Power Gaming (Xe2-HPG) for dGPUs. The reason DX9 games are very popular is because most people are using much older cards. When Battlemage comes out there will be very cheap Alchemist cards available in the used market that people can upgrade from those older Nvidia cards. Intel used F1 2024 to demo the Xe2 iGPU on Lunar Lake. A new game that was not yet released working well on an unreleased GPU. Intel is working hard to get day 1 game ready drivers for popular titles. A very different start with Battlemage than with Alchemist. I think more people will buy Battlemage compared to Alchemist buy a significant margin.

I’m rooting for Arc. But unless it’s the best GPU I won’t put it in my main PC.

if things keep going sour with china and imports become more expensive, maybe not next gen, but the gen after, intel GPUs may look like a pretty peach as the costs start to stack up

A770 got relevant 2023 January driver updates. A770 is a bit odd card where at 1080p you could say it is behind the competition but we are talking high FPS and in reality it really makes very little difference (pont 1). 1440p the drop is lot less than competition pulling level if not ahead on FPS count at compared cards. At 4k it is well ahead where it shines as the entry level card with 16gb VRAM and 256 bit bus. I use mine with 4k and works well at mid and high settings and also can handle RT most of the time. Peter let the cat out of the bag and most missed it. ARC paired with INTEL CPU gives a better performance. ARC is almost doubling it performance with INTEL CPU via REBAR/E cores but you do not see this performance on FPS count (point 2). This is why the experience often is lot better than competition with double the FPS count. None of the sponsored channels are willing to say this. GN sort of did letting Peter demonstrate how the ARC works. The speed of rendering where ARC shines as productivity card gives you a good hint where the performance actually is. Hence INTEL offering a tool for pairing. Also need to point out INTEL XeSS XMX is different to XeSS DP4A. Often missed or mixed in purpose to give worse results. Overclocks really easy for good performance boost. 2786MHz at 1.16V at 271W. Base is 2100MHz (2400MHz) 225W. Point 1: Some games are FPS capped so for example at 1080p if the game is capped at 200 FPS you often get around 100 FPS with ARC. Peter pointed the pairing with CPU and here you double the performance. Would show 100 FPS but no waiting. In reality 100 FPS performance equal the 200 FPS performance from the competition. 1440p the cap allows ARC to perform better numbers. 4k you see even less drop to the competition. I believe this is mostly about the capped games and higher the resolution less restriction there is for the ARC. Point 2: This means every FPS counts and no stutter. 100 FPS is 100 FPS not like 200 FPS from the competition where the extra 100 FPS is targeted to fill the badly timed and missed FPS with long waiting times. It often means that good 100 FPS is better than 200 FPS that are imperfect. For last I would like to point out Intel® Application Optimization (APO). This is upcoming performance that will further boost the ARC and INTEL CPU pairing by 10-50% depending of the application and game. It will be relevant for the Alchemist but more for Battlemage and standard with Celestial. So A770 is just going to get better and better with time.

Intel biggest mistake was Itanium

all servers Stuff inteL is listening but I need assistance then I Will do more arc

my A770 at least better than i expected. not by much. just need their driver to mature. i still think A770 still have more potential