You will have Super barons, like Mark Zuckenberg, Larry page ,Sergei Brin, Elon Musk,kuzweil, Bill Gates, Obama, François Hollande, Georges Bush,Netanyahu , just to name a few, who will be the overlords of the world. They will either starve, genocide or use the other billions of people as slaves, sex laves in case of the women. Imagine you have Robots working for you, they system and the police are paid by you, you can do anything. Will they choose evil or Good? Elon musk got ten children on his own but he advise the rest of the population to restring at having children . Larry Page is designing his children to be genetically perfect and he is also working on his longevity, tweaking his DNA editing in other to reach 200 years. All those future clans will want their progénitures to multiply and take up the lands of undesirable, defective humans like us. Only engeneers, like them, will survive

Errrr... ever watched Divergent? (& possibly every other movie in that genre) that's where the world is going. Maybe not the crazy destruction... but definitely 'factions' ultimately it wont be about money anymore.

+Alberto Humova and you will be a pawn to these horrible people....

@alberto you need weed in your life bro.....

+jaime almonte I forgive you, for you are judging me because you can't t undrstand me and you are limited by a so poor experience life experience . Forthough, anticipation, analytic from the past and present doesn't need weed for mind clarity, I just need coffe and a good sleep . I didn't mean that those events would certainly happened, but since I do know that history is a perpetual wheel who redo itself perpetually , It's easy then to feagure the consequences of a powegrab by a minority. The powerful CEO, billionaires it today remind me of the divers warlords that shares the italium territory during the Ancient Roman era.

This video assumes most people will be able to struggle and not get "left behind." The reality is that vast numbers of people are and will be "left behind," so society is going to have to deal with that. This new automation doesn't create anywhere near as many jobs as it takes over. Is it the growing welfare state that has put the US $20 trillion in debt?

Why do you think that you need to spend 20 grand to learn a new skill?

These vast numbers of people might not accept their faith just as the French didn't in 1789 and as the Russians didn't in 1917, a dangerous path this is.

General ignorance is the problem. If machines are capable of doing the work why in the world would we have to hang on the old Concepts like Monetary Exchange? It's automated an autonomous technology is capable of doing the work and are capable of producing an abundance there's no reason to have Monetary Exchange. Without Monetary Exchange we can simply solve problems and offer goods and services without a price tag.

@MrHoppers002 Please tell me you don't seriously believe this horse crap? We millennials we Generation Z are the next ones to take on this world why would we do that to each other when there is a clear solution. We have live so long with money that some people are not capable of seeing past such a concept but you forget that it was simply a tool and tools can become outdated Obsolete and be replaced by better systems. Look up a resource-based economy and that's what we're going to do if machines are doing the work there is no longer than need to hold on to the concept of money this is not a pipe dream or science fiction this is clearly reality. There's no need for any man woman or child after fight or struggle to get the needs of life and there is plenty enough to have access to any good or service you could ever want.

I mean...your not wrong

Common sense ;)

Top of the line and never breaks down. Sorry pal, unless you upgrade yourself, you get replaced by newer and better.

bionics.

Computers make daily life so much easier. ?

Mavericks i too could go for Sum Coffin shoppin rn

Damn it’s that real now huh!

Call it sales of the crypt

And a robot will make the coffin you'll be buried in.....for a fraction of what it use to cost. Dying is getting cheaper and cheaper.

@@sinebar you’ll have to rent the coffin aswell

Technology is too volatile and changig at too fast of a pace for you to be able to predict a job where you can't be replaced in 100 years... I don't think, from now on, there will be a irreplaceable job that stays irreplaceable for that long...

Learning how to learn fast and adapt yourself to getting as much out of your current job is key. I work in technology and I came in with the understanding that my job will probably not survive the decade and I'll probably need to learn the role that is up and coming.

20 years. Not 100. Tech progress increases very rapidly the further down the timeline we go.

How about animation or game design? Art? WaLkInG!?!?!

no industry is safe. I work as a 3d animator, and while it is more future proof than a driving or manufacturing job what is to say that a more advanced ai cant make faster more consistent decisions always on show style. not only that it could animate hundreds of thousands of frames per day for the cost of the electricity to run its still way to early now but eventually even creative professional jobs can be automated

Calvin Wong so we’re gonna get fat i.e. wall-e?

No extra jobs or work hours. Just more free time to explore, discover, and invent new techniques and technologies and spend time with friends and family.

How are people gonna afford to do anything if they don’t have a job?

The rich will probably create a communist society or a bunch of us will have to die. Lest there be revolution due to the loss of jobs to AI and tech

@@couragecrusader7649 They want us to go the way of the horse. We're nothing but serfs.

fungussa PLS don't

Even if sufficient new jobs were to be created, they'd be tech jobs, requiring degrees or high-end skills. The poor and the stupid will just become poorer. South Korea is testing out a new robot that'll deliver a pizza instead of a person. Say goodbye to delivery jobs.

Maybe, society will no longer be on money.....

@@mikewashington4188 What would compensation be without money, whether digital, paper, or a physical commodity?

True .. I think we all will be living on charity from the richest people (who will keep on becoming richer and richer).

Pretty much. College are projected to close and merger in the next 10 years.

Yes.So that the rich can become richer.

I wouldn’t want an ai doctor

Actually looks like a decent channel!

I don’t understand how they calculated some of these

This is pretty wild but I don’t trust machines

U still working there or did they let go?

More than 40% of the American population makes less than $15/hr. I suppose the powers that be expect those people who are replaced by technology to find a way to survive on their own.

The reality is the fact that more "middle class" will be pushed into poverty and corporations simply outsources the jobs and profit overseas to dodge healthcare and taxes obligations. Nations will bankrupt themselves by over printing and over borrowing money. Weaken finance and job securities will lead to xenophobia and favor even more cuts on social benefits and government healthcare spending. Eventually, governments across the globe will lose power over these multi national & multi industries companies, taxing them even less and deregulation will be the theme of the future. The "modernization" system is heading for total disaster.

Where are the corporations going to get more money from if nobody has jobs? They'll be destroyed as well, its in their best interest for UBI to be a thing.

More likely that the army becomes made up of drones and AI. When the elites realize you are not contributing to their wealth , they have no need for you and send you to a special camp by force.

Anti corporation's​ with no customers will have no money or power. jobless customers can't buy anything.

Tnb Spotter dead customers can't buy anything.

robot maintenance can be automated by building maintenance robots to service the rest... new robot design is done by artificial intelligence... not humans no human is needed at any point... they can never compete with the machine

@@ethangray8527 i guess so, but as soon as you start to include biological components in a system, you have slowed it down dramatically, and added a lot of vulnerability

It's not evolution. It is deliberate (& deliberatly hidden) Yet the answer is so simple.

So how are you going to obtain a loaf of bread?

Have you ever heard of the Venus Project? The founder Jaque fresco worked his whole life 80+ years on designing a world without money. Where machines can take care 90%+ jobs (back in the 50s so you take a guess where were at now). I'd recommend looking them up! You will not be dissapointed.

if nobody made money everyone would be an obese, defecating on their own seat, sack of useless shit, hungry, greedy ass, selfish, good for nothing moron who would be comfortable with being told what to do by the owners of your country, but uncomfortable with dealing with actual real life problems. books will be burned, porn would be favored, people will become lazy and dumb, no one will have the will to make a difference in the world because no one has an actual motive to do anything. if everything was handed to us for free, the world would be filled with even more lunatics ready to eat you alive over the last stock of whatever commercial bullshit product you mightve been craving for. also overpopulation would be an even detrimental problem as there would not be enough products to sustain the whole world. Nature will be replaced with machines, art will lose its value as people degrade their skills overtime, nobody would even know how to tie their own shoelaces anymore with the introduction of shoes that are adjustable with fancy lights in them. there would be even more shopping malls to fulfill everyone's satisfactions and slowly humanity will disintegrate into nothingness amid the robots who have replaced our purposes in life. civilization will crumble, more problems will emerge as people are never happy with what they got and always want more for themselves. there will then be a war among humans and machines then it'll be like the matrix and the terminator combined into one fucking movie but the difference is there is no protagonist cus everyone is a dumb, brainless waste of space that wouldn't do shit if a robot apocalypse happened at our doorsteps

@@byob7728 Your analysis was good at first but devolved into factually wrong science-fictional rambles.

Eventually, all jobs will be automated.

@Michael Taylor according to who? Name me a time in history where every job was automated ? I’ll wait

Jeremiah, half the world's population are morons. Why would you expect a society of intellects?

Yep

Yep

Universal Basic Income

Vote for Andrew Yang and you will receive that

Definately

I knowww as soon as I heard that voice I was certain it was him

No, me too

that is 100% true but also this paragraph im about to wright tell you why we even though we will lose alot of jobs we will gain alot more Somehow we are increasing the amount of human labor even though we are trying to decrease the amount of human labor ie. banks etc. Machines really depend on us to keep them working and for them to be used by customers and employers etc. and also the machines increase the importance of our work, judgement and creativity. Technology is removing the middle class jobs but drastically increasing lower and higher class jobs. We now have smarter students for jobs because we need to stay in school until we are 16 at least but recommended 18 instead of 14.

Friar Jean 5G is coming soon

Omar you can't hold back progress, the future is coming no matter what... human jobs will start to dry up. if you ran a store that had humans working there, your prices would have to be much higher to pay them all... but the store down the street is all automatic, self service and the prices are far cheaper... you can just decide to stick with the old system

Cool story what new jobs?

That'll be one small niche. Personally, I'd rather buy from a bot.

what about products made "of" humans.. hehehehe

How they supposed to do that with no job and money?

slappy, that might work for awhile, then that person gets their ass thrown out.

I dont need robots, i prefer to do it myself, fuck robots. Traditional things are better than a fake emotionless robot that isn't human.

there will be the wealthy elite class who own the AI and robots, and they will be each others customers buying each others robots and services and power... but the average person will have nothing to spend on products and no work

Not all mechanical systems will have full autonomy. A burger flipping robot will just be a machine built for flipping burgers. It would make no sense for it to have self awareness or a broad scope of intelligence.

The robots will become unemployed.

Not yet, anyway. Fully functioning androids are probably only a few decades away.

@@mjt1517 Im sceptical about that. There's a lot of hype regarding AI much of it is BS.

James Roscoe your skepticism will melt away as the tech develops.

@@mjt1517 I work in transportation and there are companies already working on autonomous vehicles, so I'm concerned and I'm in my early 30s. That's why I'm planning on learning a new skill which can lead to running my own business.

boldsign... Uh...No....machines will be repairing machines....humans will are not technical and precise enough to fix those advances technologies....

Cars break down but you don't see horses pulling carriages again.

You don’t think they’ll find ways to deal with malfunctioning machines?...

MostEnigmatic More machines.....machines will be repairing machines that repair machines....

Ghana Mafia ya... No people will be repairing them

The problem is I cannot predict when an EMP is about to happen

*we

there are ways futurism.com/for-first-time-ever-carbon-nanotube-transistors-have-outperformed-silicon/

Moore's law does not describe the entirety of technological advancement. It's only about silicon semiconductors and goes as far as silicon wafer processes can go. From there we will need a new law describing the optimization of electrical technology.

It's important to note that Moore's law affects hardware only. Software can improve much more significantly and more flexibly, and does not necessarily require better hardware to do so. A lot of "intelligent" apps and programs do NOT need all those 3.4 Ghz in four cores that the phone company advertises. Many AI programs can run on very basic hardware. Also, you could always vertically stack circuit wavers. The tech isn't quite there yet but many companies are pushing for it precisely because of the huge performance improvements it could bring.

Most of the big futurists don't see the ending of Moore's law as the end, they see the start of another form of Moore's Law continuing the exponential growth of technology.