r u nuts, sometimes, but sometimes its the opposite!

sagara4e yeah, like jumping of a cliff..

Well, no, he says, to do the test.. Because you often find out that the fear is absolutely justified.. At least he did in his talk ten years later.

@@i-am-your-conscience yes, true :)

Glad you notice also! I was so inspired!

You're just an idiot. Ferriss is a huge con artist.

@@garyj9270 no u

I agree! What he talks about is effective hard work: this means doing the right things :)

F

I would argue that his point is the opposite: do what you have to do despute your lack of confidence

Intelligence, not everyone has it to the same degree.

Correct

Jonathan TerryI know right? Jealous people can be so irritating and when we point it out to them, they deny it.

Jonathan Terry I've liked what Tim Ferriss says, but like any professional he can cover up his issues and make some of the most elementary mistakes where I can see him being very secretive in a lot of ways. That's where you shouldn't take anyone too seriously or blindly follow them. There can always be a better way, and he can be behind in a lot of ways in some of the knowledge he talks about. He could be having problems his system doesn't address to where his system can have some holes in it just like anyone else. Some people can be more skeptical because they can see this. He can be jaded to where I don't think there's certain information he'll look at, or there's more ways he can evolve his knowledge but he closes off too many people to himself to where he won't communicate with them or get more knowledge from broader amounts of people. He's privy to his select group but it greatly limits him. I think he plateaued after Four Hour Body. For a lot of what he talks about, there's much greater ways to where he can progress much further but instead he only looks at certain levels to where a lot of it can be on a very basic level that isn't that great. But other things I'm highly impressed by where he's shared some top research where it's life changing the power in much of his science that's much needed for today. He tries to create this image of being impenetrable but I see it as a weakness, and can see he disguises his weaknesses which they're very basic. It will limit him in the long run, like how come he's not a billionaire yet? He's been sticking to just a millionaire, and he hasn't been taking it to the level he talks of. He churches up a lot of things to where he does all of these things and then he makes you feel obligated to do them. Then the person does it but they don't like it. That's where the question of self identity comes in, and he's just sharing what he does to where you might not like it and would want to do something else. That's just where his life has taken him. He might have gotten stuck into doing things he doesn't like, just for his system of the sake of doing things. He's not necessarily that great at a lot of things either, where he's more obligated to do it. He's very good at other things. That's where a person wants to look at what they can get out of something where you can combine concepts to do far less things, and only do those things for a period until it's no longer necessary cutting out quantity and just getting the desired quality to make far more time, and then to get into much higher level things with that. He could get into the commercial aspects too much for the redundant type watered down selling stuff to where it's more like a jaded thing as opposed to actually enjoying doing it. Then he's turned everything into churched of obligation of just doing things. I've seen that at anything he does, many of those he could be significantly better to where maybe there's other areas of his identity he needs to explore. A lot of it can just be bells and whistles, and cannon fodder. I've also been very impressed by many of the scientific concepts he talks about, and I've liked many of the subjects he's gotten into. What are you without those things, that's another important question of what do you have that's eternal, but that isn't physical. And vice versa where the left brained aspect of knowledge and application in the world where you need knowledge and physical skills to experience the physical reality. He can exaggerate himself and blow himself out of proportion. He could possibly have confidence issues he masks. To where you can say all that and then you see you weren't supposed to say that, like ooohhh I shouldn't have said that.

Right, nobody's perfect. Nevertheless, there's a lot of unjustified hate surrounding Tim. I think a lot of it has to do with the outlandish amount of hype (and it's obviously working for him) that he puts into his products. As far as his plateau being reached, it's a matter of perspective. On one hand he was making way more than he is now with his company that inspired the 4 hour work week. On the other hand he has his own highly successful television show now and has a trilogy of highly successful books. I guess it depends on where your priorities lie. PS I've visited his blog a couple times. He doesn't hide the fact that he's human.

Jonathan Terry Maybe he's settled down with a wife and has some children. If he ages well he can have any woman he wants for decades to come. I thought he could take it further but maybe he just doesn't have the right team for something along those lines, but what he is great at is sharing very good scientific information and experience with application. If he did worse on the SATs then where would he be today. It's kind of weak in my opinion that he puts so much emphasis on success on that education, where while it's good shouldn't there be something else he should consider of value to where he's way too dependent on that opportunity he almost didn't have because he barely made it in his SATs scores. The opportunity where he barely made it to Harvard. He probably still would have gotten an education in college university if he did worse on the test and didn't go to Harvard, to where he would still have a lot of strengths today. There's that point when some people have to put down the hand they have even though it's a good hand to where they can delve into that more. While others will continue with those hands but it goes downhill where they're trying to go for the high point but not the content or quality. Within any stage they have their choices. I personally haven't read any bad reviews or bad information on Tim Ferriss, I wonder where you're hearing of people that have some objections to Tim Ferriss. Tim Ferriss could come up with some other big things in his 40s and if he can keep doing that into his 50s and 60s that would be cool to where he still considers himself that level of a name into his 50s and 60s instead of retiring in his 30s. There's cool stuff he wants to take further but hasn't figured out the best system for it like new types of education for many people where I can think of ways to improve that or the people it should be meant for.

Daniel Holt Sorry man, I'm not really understanding your message.

Favoriate person of all time!

Perhaps after Elon Musk

@@saransh85 elon musk is just a pop celeb at this point.

so now you can swim, learn languages and do the tango nice one tim is a wizard

At this point, he looks like a mix of Michael and the Tank. But now 2020, he looks like scofield lol.

the 1st thing you do is wait for tim to reply to your comment i'm sure he'll reply within 2 years so just sit tight i asked tim a question in the comments section over 5 years ago and i'm still waiting, but i have faith he will get back to me - it may be as soon as tomorrow or next week

Koi bat nhi..der aaye durust aaye😂