Amen

Warm up

Stay brave. 💪

agreed

T1mTenn1s I care. Also, dayasotical's comment got 32 likes while yours got zero, so that's a good indication of how many people care.

@@hamzaabbaszaidi8788 78 now and i cant see the comment you referring for

@@razoo911 I think the comment I referred to was somebody saying "nobody cares".

That’s why she is. It judging at wimbkedon

the problem here is that some times, the chair umpire simply cannot remember if the call came before or after the shot was made. They have to watch the other player/s motion for a challenge, indicate a challenge on her device, then call it in, then wait for the review. A simple remedy would be to just allow them to view a replay, it takes less time than having players argue it.

Nah bro, Perez hit the ball out.

No she wasnt at all

As a tennis umpire myself I can confirm. She is absolutely right it should have been called a hindrance, and the point should have been replayed

Hass on that match: "you're sooo wrong agaaain..." I don't like her. Seems like she is acting, playing her role.

flexible dude?

@@lobomalsano its a joke

Pathetic insecure male loser.

@@zafferung4440 I literally complemented on her strength, but whatever you say, boomer.

Yeah, strong indeed. Reminds me of Stan Wawrinka xD

I tried to break my Head Youtek Prestige racquet by that way... but it is impossible... jajajaja.

@@hamaja18 ,If you were boiling like she was you would probably make it.

Her honesty is amazing, especially on that point

@@wonderlandian8465 Im on truth serum, pls enjoy :) kzfaq.info/sun/PLJ_6YpUob3JSzMkE8SyuYwWEIBt6IqSuD

I was going to say the same thing, you rarely see sportsmanship on the women's tour. Sure, a few are friendly at the net but never during the actual match.

haha, who's in power ;)

@@Walkman0007 ,And then she broke the racquet got a point penalty and lost the match in the end,she probably wanted to kill him 🤣

First, Vandeweghe had a good argument as the call & her swing were nearly simultaneous. Second, she uses no bad language or personal insults. Only says, "I hope you get fined for this" & gets a violation when she done & walking to playing position. WTF ?? If Serena Williams were treated like this there were several GS events she would have racked up all the violations to be disqualified on a single dispute.

Chuck Smith factsss🙌🏽

@@1158scott If the hit and call were nearly simultaneous, the call would've had no bearing on her swing; so she really didn't have a good argument.

@T1mTenn1s lol

I agree that Martic showed a great sportsmanship here, but didn't she flipped off Mladenovic at Wuhan Open?

@@casek7531 yiiiiiikes yeah, you're right. I didn't know that. Time to edit my comment.

@@casek7531 This may have been her way of apologizing plus why make a permanent enemy in Mlad by standing by on this call?

🤣🤣🤣🤣she HULKED up and fractured that racket.....!

She’s super aggressive!

He's the best. My mom calls him "the kindergarten teacher" because of the soothingly firm way he handles the players. :)

Ikr, its so tough to do that

@@santiagomunez341 its really not hard, its the angle you hit the ground with it.

@@davidca96 she was breaking it over the knee, wasnt she?

She was boiling,that's how,she probably wanted to break that racquet on the umpire's head 🤣

well, she looks like she could kick the butt of some scrawnier guy imo lol...that woman is powerfull!

Actually is Teichmann who speaks a lot of language during the match normally (she speaks 6 languages)

I'm not 100% sure about this, but I'm pretty sure that in tennis you can hit the ball multiple times as long as it's in one motion. That is indeed a rule. However, I think the umpire was saying that she did two motions and the second motion was trying to correct the miss hit of the first motion.

Hi, the umpire was right and wrong at the same time. She was right because the ball clearly bounced twice. But, she was wrong in a way that she said that Sakkari had a foul shot that did not occur. Fortunately, she gave the point to Cornet, what was the right thing.

@Einars Dubrovskis This is not the bounce on the floor which is contested but those on the raquet , if you look right , the ball hit twice the raquet of sakkari

@Einars Dubrovskis are you drugs or something😂 you can clearly seen it bounced twice even at 0.25, I suppose your not that transparent at all then!🤣

It means the ball made contact with the racket twice in the same shot.

I think it depends on the umpire's interpretation of the rules. In the section on verbal abuse, the Official Grand Slam Rulebook states: *For the purposes of this Rule, verbal abuse is defined as a statement about an official, opponent, sponsor, spectator or other person that implies dishonesty or is derogatory, insulting or otherwise abusive* So if you called the umpire "corrupt" or "a liar", that's an indisputable violation, as you're implying dishonesty. But mild insults like "idiot" are debatable I guess, as the umpire may or may not deem it offensive enough to justify a violation of the rule.

Yeah how on earth could she think she won the point ?? Call was way before she hit the ball, and also she hit it back in

This! Her complaining made no sense. Even if the out call *had* been after Wang hit... Wang hit the ball back into play... so it makes no difference, it's still a replay.

k m she clearly did. That happens all the time. Have you ever fucking watched tennis before?

@@JamesFrew1 so your saying after it was called out before she hit it (which im not denying) she then proceeded to deliberately hit the ball long? why would she do this and what would she gain? all i was doing was pointing out she had a floored argument so maybe you have never fucking watched tennis before

k m I’ve covered tennis and am a former player. The entire point of this highlight is that the umpire was wrong. Once you hear ‘out’ players often ‘dump’ the ball, which is taking your frustration out, or hitting in the direction of a ballperson. That’s what happened here. She heard out, and she didn’t play the ball, she just hit it. She was correct however you look at it-those are the rules.

@@JamesFrew1 I agree. That is something I could do. If I call a ball out, I could just blast it back ten feet out.

Well, maybe she was looking for other arguments to make because the factual one, that linesman called it out before she hit the shot did not hold.

Haha vandeweghe is COCOnuts

Jack C i knew right when she began arguing that she was american just so annoying lol

@@tranquilizer3060 ,Yeah you can say that she was kind of a little angry there nothing much 🤣

If you look closely at the slow motion replay, you can see that Sakkari intentionally hit the ball twice. As the umpire explained, the only time it is legal to make contact with the ball twice on the same shot is if it's done inadvertently with the one swing. But if you intentionally make contact twice in order to correct the ball's trajectory, as Sakkari did, that's a foul shot.

But she’s right!

The ball bounced a second time before Sakkari hit it, which is illegal. The umpire was stating that the way Sakkari controlled her racket to hit the ball was proof that she didn't get to it on time, and Maria couldn't argue with her because she knew the umpire was right.

Yes, Cicak ruled it a foul shot as sakkari made (in cicak’s opinion) two distinctly different motions to contact the ball (thus why it the ball hit racquet twice before going over). As Cicak explains, it would’ve been a legal shot if sakkari had only made one continuous motion to hit the ball (even if the racquet struck the ball twice).

@@dayostical The ball didn't bounce twice - Sakkari hit the ball twice in one stroke, and she modified her stroke after the first hit, then rolled it off the racket to avoid the ball going out, which is an illegal shot. (If she hadn't modified her stroke and accidentally hit the ball twice, it would have been ok)

The umpire called the equivalent of a double hit - aka "not up" because of the scooping motion.

basically Sakkari hit twice the ball involuntary and apparently the umpire thought it wasn't allowed but I read somewhere that, if it's not voluntar, you keep playing the point

Gosh its been so long since i've played but. A deliberate double hit is deemed as illegal right? So the umpire considered this as deliberate because of the scooping motion? Is that deliberat ethough?

She hit it flat first and then she scooped it upwards hitting it again?

@@Adrianisasianwbu I wouldn't have called it, as it looked like one motion. Even Cornet was confused, so a call like that really wasn't all that necessary, but that's just from my view.

lol perez did not miss that on purpose. These are pros! With $ and points on the line you just put it back into the court and let the umpires do their job.

Coco.... is a powerful woman!

Anto Galbraith not to be rude but i personally think she wasn’t? and on top of that she was just so disrespectful to the umpire which didn’t help her case

@@kaylaosorio7730 aw you think so? I honestly thought she was right.

I think you're making this more complicated than it needs to be. If any part of the ball touches the line then the ball is good...whether or not the touch is the result of the ball deforming is immaterial--you consider the entire ball/sphere and not the pin point of first contact.

@@bobcrane4801 Could also just look at it as a bird's eye view - when the ball touches the court, if any part of said ball is over top of the line, whether it's touching or not, it's in.

I think its fine the way it is, you know one point can make a difference in tennis match. And it is very hard to win a point/hit a winner.

Ricc Lee I think it’s usually too close to call and it’s not something you particularly look out for

@@elliotthomas8346 Umpires are only meant to award the point if there is no doubt at all about the timing of the call (relative to the timing of contact). It's an issue with improper enforcement.

Gregory C it’s such a difficult thing to judge imo but they seem to award points quite often

Wow generalisation much? Outside of Kyrgios and Tomic the majority of Australian players have GREAT attitudes!

@@kalemarnica32 Hewitt was another obnoxious prick

@@kalemarnica32 Lleyton hewitt also, I wasn't just talking about the players, I was talking about supporters too. I remember watching a match, it must have been Hewitt playing Radek Stepanek, and Hewitt came back from 0-2 down in sets to level at 2-2. and the crowd started chanting we're gonna win it 3-2. just completely unnecessary and disrespectful.

@@poplova Sorry but your comment specially stated tennis players only. And come on, all all tennis crowds are bias towards there own player at all the tournaments, just look at the french at Roland Garros who are we kidding here?

@@kalemarnica32 Don't get me wrong. there's bias, and then there's just pure disrespect. of course we all have our favourites

But in this case she’s right. They should have replayed the point!

On second viewing. She is actually wrong.

You my friend just gave a whole new life to this video.