finally someone who understands

ONG

Yes finally someone who said it.

Imagine T-Rex's moving at the speed of a elephant and not catching anything lol

@@electricradcliffe82exactly

LOL

“I’m gonna phuq you up.” - Iguanadong

@@activatekruger446 lmao

Exactly 💯

It’s one reason why I appreciate how Therizinosaurus was portrayed in Jurassic World Dominion. It may have been a herbivore, but it sure as heck wasn’t friendly.

Yeah just play ark survival lol

also herbivores can bite so if there’s an aggressive herbivore, a dino that casually eats tough leaves and rotten wood as a daily diet,,,definitely gonna be rough

And that should include the HADROSAURS. Seriously, hadrosaurs don't get enough credits they deserve.

I was thinking about that lol

Except for the hilarious descriptions and snarky comments, other than that, very much

Literally though

The only difference is that this guy is more serious

Fax I really want them to collab if he became more popular

Than why does he put scary background music in literally all of these videos?

Id argue he does the contrary, dinos have lost some of their fanfare since now, accurate dinosaurs are depicted as animals. So he depicts the accurate dinosaurs as monsters again to make them atractive to the general audience without selling them the fake stuff.

@@user-nw1je1ur6t he still respects dinosaurs stop getting mad about everything😑 also animals can be scary. he’s not saying they’re monsters 😑

@@cartooncatboy3009 im not mad at anything, im just pointing facts, like, you are mad at me

I agree. If I were to rank the dinosaurs I would want to be killed by, Dromaeosaurs would be at the bottom of the list.

Yeah it’s more like a stabbing weapon

Don't bears start eating instead of killing it first too

@@jj-ce8bb Kinda yeah, they tend to maul their prey until it can't fight back anymore, either due to dying or from being paralyzed/to weak to fight back. then it is dinner time.

Or in younger individuals, to possibly climb trees

you can’t really compare modern carnivores to dinosaurs in terms of intelligence

@@corythecorythosaurus1983 Why not? It's not like they weren't animals or something

@@minorlover6938 you can’t because mammals and dinosaurs are completely different species and i never said they weren’t animals what tf do you mean 💀

@@corythecorythosaurus1983 Ah yes because all carnivores are mammals

@@minorlover6938 never said that man and he’s talking about social behavior and mammals have that

Carnivorous? I thought the whole character of the Night Feeder is that he’s a serial killer in Dino skin?

Yeah that’s pretty funny ngl

Elephants don't have much in terms of predation either, yet males get aggressive regularly, even more so when it are young males with no old males around to keep them in check. To the point of fighting and killing Rhinos for the fun of it. While i do not think a Sauropod will be as aggressive, i can absolutely see it sending a smaller animal flying because it was in it's personal space/ in the way.

​@@charchadonto We should also think about the fact that all of the animals I've heard brought up and compared to sauropods have been mammalian. You can't and really shouldn't be compared a reptile to a mammal when speculating about behavioral traits, as it is speculation and is easily thrown off in this way. Bull elephants get incredibly aggressive due to hormones, kinda like puberty. Reptiles and mammals have different reproductive systems/cycles in some ways and similar in others. In other words, you should try to find an animal closer related to sauropods and go from there, as using mammals is not sufficient evidence.

@@Kitty-xi1sb Dinosaurs are birds. And there's no evidence suggesting sauropods were territorial.

Dinosaurs are/were not birds, birds are dinosaurs. Sauropods are not too closely related to birds, either. Theropods were.

@@Kitty-xi1sb sorry for late reply While true, we simply have no modern analogs to extrapolate from. As the largest herbivorous reptiles and birds are either aquatic or treedwelling and only a fraction of the size of a sauropod. So behaviour wise it will always be speculation until we find some fossil evidence of behaviour/interaction.

If you really want to get into a prehistory deep dive I'd recommend the channels Paleo Analysis, Pbs eons, and (while no exclusive to paleontology stuff) Ben G Thomas and The budget museum. Even the unnatural history channel while his videos are on fictional creature's they are VERY informative about a huge variety of things

Totally agree, nice to see someone else mentioning the fact that we would be too small to be worth the effort for a mega-theropod like tyrannosaurus rex, and how dinosaurs were almost definitely curious and intelligent animals looking at borderline all modren animals with a brain, although large dromaeosaurs(raptors) like utahraptor, dakotaraptor, and achillobator would be the perfect size to eat people ie: big enough to easily kill us but small enough a human would still be plenty of food, of course that doesn’t make them monsters everything has to eat and predators have to hunt, us being the perfect food size for them isn’t their fault just a cool fact i wanted to share and why i would be more scared of a utahraptor then a tyrannosaurus, Also a triceratops or ankylosaurus would likely be a incredibly animal dangerous looking at similarly sized herbivores like rhinos and elephants today, again doesn’t make them monsters just as elephants and rhinos aren’t but they would still probably be very dangerous.

I think if presented with the opportunity to tyrannosaurus would totally try to eat a person. Granted and Nile crocodile will do the same but I still love them! I feel the same way about dinosaurs.

@@Rx2equalsRR see, even if they're perfectly sized, would they WANT to eat us? We're one of the few animals God made that sweats ammonia, which not a whole lot of animals like. That, and if they saw us carrying even a simple spear, they recognize that as danger and would not see us as worth while calories, especially if they see Old Raptor Bob get impaled by one or several

@@Rx2equalsRR I think raptors wouldn't attack a human at first if they have never seen one. They probably would be very curious. However, they could suddenly start attacking you. Not a full on attack, but probably just biting or charge attacks, just to see how a human reacts. Once they understand how the human reacts and they spot a weakness, then thats going to be a problem.

@@obambagaming1467I agree i dont see them immediately attacking the first time they see a human unless they were starving, because they have no idea what you are but after they got used to you you’d start to look like food

Pretty much any predatory animals would do, even T-rex does the same

​@@sweethomealabama4381 bruh loose gangs

He didn’t say it was confirmed😑

Wouldn’t say most powerful, just the most well known (apart from modern animals).

@@raptorzilla0710 oh yeah you’re right But I said powerful because some of these creatures were strong

@@raptorzilla0710 T Rex was literally the most powerful terrestrial predator of all time

@@minorlover6938 what about gigantosaurus?

​@@aidengardiner2268 giga was smaller and if u say length in biology we determine size with mass so yes trex was larger

100% Just because an animal is scary doesn't mean it isn't also brilliant or beautiful

Yes

Depends on the species of Parasaurolophus

I believe herbivores kill more people a year than carnivores, so there is that.

@@TheDinoFax Yeah carnivores have little reason to kill humans or even kill that much on a normal diet they would probably go on large breaks of eating

🤦Trex is the Apex predator

what about the Giga?

​@@potatowestandforukraine5574 giga was smaller

Loose gangs only

They would fight over dead body

Thank you!

That whole "breaking the sound barrier" thing has since been proven false, and hell sauropods didn't even need to do that, rather they'd use their massive tails to shove, rather than beat or whip, and considering that especially the large sauropod's tails can weigh several tonnes, it is a VERY effective tool

Thanks for updating me. 👍Yeah, getting shoved by a sauropod tail sounds like getting whacked with an entire tree.

@@sammykat2hbyeah I wouldn't imagine there's much difference between a tree and a sauropod tail when you're getting hit by them lmao

Technology?

We should also think about the fact that all of the animals I've heard brought up and compared to sauropods have been mammals. You can't and really shouldn't be compared a reptile to a mammal when speculating about behavioral traits, as it is speculation and is easily thrown off in this way. Bull elephants get incredibly aggressive due to hormones, kinda like puberty. Reptiles and mammals have different reproductive systems/cycles in some ways and similar in others. In other words, you should try to find an animal closer related to sauropods and go from there, as using mammals is not sufficient evidence. Also, isn't either debated or disproven that they would use their tails in such a manner?

@@Kitty-xi1sb i mean, if we want to have a "closer" species, we propably should go with ostriches or other non-flying birds. But even they have sudden aggressive eruptions and charge towards you, so i think we're pretty much on the same page wether we use an Ostrich or and Elephant. I am not up to date with the Sauropod defensive behavior but i thought they used their tails for intimidation at least. But yes if the Tail would get injured or else the Animal would have a Problem with its Balance so i see the Point why they wouldn't have used them.

@@bikelifenezha3061 Not really, as sauropods aren't really closely related to birds. Birds came from theropod dinosaurs, not sauropod. Due to this, birds are also unreliable. We don't really have any reliable modern-day substitutes, the closest thing would probably be crocodiles. Seeing as birds and crocodiles are both archosaurs (Except birds came FROM a different kind of dinosaur, whereas crocodiles are more similar to the ancestors of dinosaurs), both birds and crocodiles would be the most reliable, however, I feel like crocodiles are more reliable. And I'm glad that you noticed a main issue with using the tail as a weapon, balance. Requires a sharp mind and good thinking for that. I can tell you're smart, unlike many people I argue with on here. Which is why you may also understand that at the end of the day, this is all speculation, and we may never know for sure.

@@Kitty-xi1sb If your doing behavior there is no reason to not compare to species which are semi analogous to the theorized lifestyle. It makes no sense to compare something like a sauropod to a crocodile when crocodiles are incredibly specialized and also a literal carnivore not a herbivore. Crocodilians are far removed from most dinosaur lifestyles and using them to base behavior purely because of phylogeny is worse than basing behavior off analogous or semi analogous modern species despite their distance on the evolutionary tree. Speculation in paleoartistry is probably the most needed thing right now considering dinosaurs have incredibly different lifestyles to anything today and you'll be surprised to find the amount of weird adaptions modern day animals have as well. We have no choice to base behavior off of the species we have now but we should also try thinking entirely abstractly outside of purely comparisons and analogies

@@JuanGonzalez-iw1hi I never said it was a good one. I said it was likely the best one. It's a terrible comparison, I'm aware of that.

He's saying that Spinosaurus is *ONE OF* the largest, not *THE* largest. Spinosaurus (at least the Spinosaurinae indent) is definitely one of the largest, being in the top 10, but is not THE largest

Pack hunting?

Dude..

They more likely mobbed