Heavier weight on heart, less weight on inner lever. Outer lever aimed more outward. No hook, timing not right, no-go. (''no wheel moves by heavy blows'' Bessler Mt 52)
Пікірлер: 20
@kukaliemikalie8157Ай бұрын
When you get it to accelerate by itself, you give me a call.
@lindaellison899Ай бұрын
This one is a no-go. Test theory #3 might be closer to Bessler's configuration. thanks
@QuantumEnergySearchАй бұрын
Skinner is the best (and by that I mean the simple one I made). Basically it's like this. When the centrifugal force and gravity counter each other you can use manipulations to get the weight to speed out with almost no force. By moving the center forwards, which isn't possible when the centrifugal force is on the center, it has to be countered with gravity. Why this works so well, I haven't completely figured out yet.
@lindaellison899Ай бұрын
yes, the constantly changing ''up-right-down-left'' forces from wheel to pivot points of levers haven't figured out yet either! thanks=)
@QuantumEnergySearchАй бұрын
@@lindaellison899 it's not complicated. Throw besslers foolish ramblings in the trash and study the simple physics of what is going on. Bessler intentionally wanted to confuse and mesmerize. He was successful.
@lindaellison899Ай бұрын
@@QuantumEnergySearch the physics would be like throwing a duffle bag over the shoulder. First swing in, then swing out and up over.
@QuantumEnergySearchАй бұрын
@@lindaellison899 yes, i do this type of thing moving heavy object all the time, as long as it's not too heavy, but you can for example lift a bucket 2 feet up by manipulating the handle with almost no effort.
@lindaellison899Ай бұрын
@@QuantumEnergySearch Exactly! The ''bucket'' in Weissensteinia prima Figura, MTs 29,46,62,98,101, 122,123. Same bucket/cup ratio/measurement is hearts-14,27,130 paddles-52,55 swing seats-85,86 bellows-81,125,129 hammers-133,139. From the overlaid bible verses, the ''heart'' swings in at 8 o'clock to bounce up/out at 1:30 o'clock and ''rest or dwell'' on the hook. (ps37;3-5, prov3;5, lam3;41, phil3;20, etc)
@soupfloodАй бұрын
What is the goal here?
@blades7558Ай бұрын
I think they're trying to break the laws of physics by making a perpetual motion machine.
@lindaellison899Ай бұрын
These are just some tests/experiments/theories of how Bessler's self-turn wheel of 1712 may have worked. thanks www.besslerwheel.com/
@That_1940s_DelinquentАй бұрын
What is this??
@lindaellison899Ай бұрын
testing a theoretical configuration that may (or may not) have been used in Bessler's self-turn wheel of 1712. thanks www.besslerwheel.com/
@Someone-A3Ай бұрын
Maybe it's time to try a different approach, try combining other methods outside of the wheel instead of only within the wheel.
@lindaellison899Ай бұрын
yes, thankyou. had better Rythm in tests 3 & 4. wondering if flailing can be timed more @ 1 o'clock, before abandoning the approach. You have some ideas for other methods outside of the wheel? (ur right about the fundamentals1sam8;1-20) thanks=)
@Someone-A3Ай бұрын
@@lindaellison899 maybe use a combination of magnet(s) and/or pendulum(s).
@lindaellison899Ай бұрын
@@Someone-A3 yes, good ideas. May be with the right combination. thanks.