Don't mess with QA 🤭

snap i was thinking the same thing

NOOOOOOOOO! Save your sanity! Save your soul! Save whatever shred of faith you may have left in human work ethic! That ^ is my actual job. I. Will. Never. Be. The. Same. Again. 😳🤬🤪🤪

@@wipjenniyou can never look at random websites the same way again hahaha

​@stephaniemoura9325 it's painfully true! And what's also true is that after 6 years, I was fired by the new manager days after I posted that comment. (I QCd site builds pre-launch.) The reason was (this is the exact quote): "We need to get someone in who is OK doing the same QC issues over and over and over, and be OK with that." She actually said "over" three times! She was also wrong with "three". In the previous 2 months, I had reported 43 instances of devs using white text on white backgrounds in menus alone! 😂

yep!

so youre sayin youtube needs QA?

@@instalocktaka9628 KZfaq needs a lot more than QA, it needs Jesus

lmao

thank you nice video

None of errors are acceptable. Warnings are lets say okey - not so important and can be skipped

Same here Please do you have any learning materials

Contact support, no

could you imagine that ? "hello is this BK ? yeah i found a bug on your website" "oh holy shit sir, thank you. here, have 20 bucks"

@@TraneGraffMaster well yes, that would be very nice :( lol

Me too! That's ridiculous

as a tester i wanted your advice i really wanna get this job

its a program called XRAY

In most software development environments, testers are responsible for identifying and reporting bugs, while developers are responsible for fixing them. This separation of roles helps maintain a clear division of labor and ensures a thorough and unbiased approach to quality assurance. Here's why testers typically do not fix bugs themselves: Independence and Impartiality: Testers are focused on objectively evaluating the software's functionality and quality. By not fixing bugs themselves, they avoid potential conflicts of interest that could arise if they were also responsible for implementing fixes. Specialization: Testers specialize in testing methodologies, techniques, and practices. Their expertise lies in identifying and documenting defects, as well as ensuring the overall quality and usability of the software. Efficiency: Developers are trained and experienced in programming and codebase intricacies. Allowing them to fix the bugs streamlines the process, as they have the skills to directly address the root causes of issues. Collaboration: The interaction between testers and developers is crucial for a successful software development process. Testers provide valuable information about defects, which developers then use to address the issues effectively. Time Management: Separating the roles of testing and development enables both testers and developers to focus on their respective tasks, leading to better time management and efficiency. Quality Control: Collaboration between testers and developers helps ensure that issues are properly understood, addressed, and validated before the software is released to end-users. However, it's essential to note that the level of collaboration between testers and developers can vary based on the team's dynamics and the specific organization's processes. Some organizations might have a more collaborative approach where testers and developers work closely together to investigate and address defects. Ultimately, while testers are not typically responsible for fixing bugs themselves, they play a critical role in identifying and reporting issues, which contributes to the overall quality of the software product.

hand it over

Easy learn manual testing techniques , then jump into some automation testing if you are comfortable

Absolutely. The text field should only allow you to enter a max amount for the phone number

Yeah boundary value must have to be fixed by the developers..

i don't think they even have a tester lol

​@@kazakukogthey don't because that's too many.bugs

How so?