That new toyota is horrible. They need to go back to the 5.7

As if all of them aren't self-destructing. 🙄

@@doug6191truth…the issue is on 2022-2023 Toyota…not 2024 Tundras

​@@Voodoo-cz5hkband-aid

Ha!

😭😭😭😭

They're not "suffering" they're making them to fall apart on purpose. Planned obsolescence it's horrible. Especially like you said when the prices are this high. Either make cheap crap vehicles and get pushed out of the market, or make good reliable quality vehicles that you can charge a premium for and ppl will willingly pay for that reliability. That's the whole reason Toyota ever got a foot hold in the US to begin with. 🤦

@@Fly-aaron92 as that is true if you look at stellantis for the ram factories, the manufactures are suffering, what’s the CEO is doing to them is terrible, I own a 2018 ram but at that time they were better now they are literally coming off the lines with problems before even being shipped to dealerships… the UAW workers are even suffering still, if you look up with the CEOs done to those as well it’s just terrible while he made a $38-$39 million profit less than a year while under paying the workers having the factories be gross and not giving a shit about products when it leaves the line while residing at the factory still.

He's not wrong

The problem is the EPA drove them to make unreliable trucks and the manufacturers bowed down to it instead of fighting to the supreme court. Why would they though, by submitting to the EPA overreach, the manufacturers get to make and sell more vehicles because they have short lifespans.

I used to tow heavy crap all the time at work with 1 tons, then years later at a different job I pulled a trailer with a Ram 1500 (with the Hemi), and I was like, "This sucks."

I agree. No way I’d max it out on these trucks. I’d consider it for short distances but no way I’d go any major distance pulling 10k with any of those

They can handle up to 13,200 idk where tf these guys got that GMC without any towing features

See, I’m right on that edge. Towing a 7500 lbs camper with heavy tongue weight that takes away from GVWR.

@@Ringmacherexactly. Drivers think because the manufacturer claims a certain tow rating, they can pull that max weight. They don’t take into account how much payload they have with said weight. Payload ratings are based on dry weight. Fuel alone adds 150-220 depending on tank size.

That’s hilarious!! 🤣

😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

Read this as he said it 😆

Agreed. Keep Roman in the office.

no rust on the ford ;)

@@OverKill440Well there differentials will 😂

All will be in junkyards in 6 years. They are only designed to last the 5 years of an initial lease period

There's a new RAM that was just delivered to my local dealer that has the bed liner de-laminating already after sitting in the sun for a few days. Probably a one off issue but jeez the truck is $83k...come on

​@mikexyz7461 really? How come my 2015 2.7l ecobeast f150 with 156,000 miles is still going strong?

So new synthetic oils last 7k-9k, so just continue to change your oil every 5k and you'll be ok. You guys with these dipsticks, lolol

Yeah, checking fluids in your vehicle is silly. Best to leave it to the dealerships who never lie to customers.

@@richardalexander1838 They removed it for a reason. They want to hide oil consumption behind a digital display. And going 7k+ miles between oil changes causes many of the reliability and oil consumption issues today. The oil might have life left, but it's loaded with the diesel like soot that GDI engines generate and that additives do little to negate.

​@@kevinwasilauskis8943Any issue with oil in the engine is covered under warranty. Why else would they not have a dipstick

@@richardalexander1838 "You guys with these dipsticks" lol too - RAM REV and be done with it.

They are 120k up here in Montreal 😂

Buy an older model and rebuild it

Did they mention the price? I must have missed it. When was that?

So buying a truck is gonna stop you from retiring in comfort? Sounds like you didn't have a good plan🤣🤣

​@@atg1338 at least he has a plan. Unlike most today complaining about not affording a house, student loan debt and "Living Wage" Some of the nicest vehicles I've seen belong to broke A$$ fools

Uh, people can afford them because they're selling. YOU can't afford them.

@@TheCapn23people are also not making payments, 2023s still on the lot and 0% interest deals in near future! Watch!

​@@TheCapn23You mean the bank can afford them

What about Roman and him talking out of his ass with all his opinionated gibberish? Hahaha!

Bingo. While under warranty there's no discernable difference. After that point I'd trust the Coyote and the 5.7 Hemi most.

@@omardevonlittle3817Any naturally aspirated is a more known factor; the 5.7 in the Tundra was great too. That being said, we don’t know how reliable the new Hurricane or updated EcoBoost engines will be in 10+ years; history shows that turbos are more likely to have issues, but those turbos have also been improved to increase reliability, and only time will tell the real story.

Great way to look at things. Very practical. Hopefully you don't pull up next to a Ram and have buyers regret over a few thousand dollars.

@@Cloud30000 According to anecdotal evidence on the forums over the past 10 years, the 2.7 appears to be Ford's most reliable F-150 engine. I love mine. If your towing needs are modest I highly recommend it. And to be clear, it tows up to its rated limit better than the 5.0 and nearly as well as the 3.5. It just maxes out sooner than they do. The 5.0 has had some pretty serious issues. Not sure if they worked those out yet, but now they added cylinder deactivation, which is probably going to offset any improvements. But as Toyota has shown us, no modern truck is a sure thing when it comes to reliability. May as well just buy why you like and not worry about what you can't control.

Same here. Got a f-150 tremor. 2022. So excited still. The only thing that keeps me from driving it is my 911

There will probably be an aftermarket dipstick

The Hurricane is based on the Alfa Romeo Giorgio 4-cylinder. It’s a true Fiat engine. The Hurricane will prove to be junk long term. Mark my words

​@@BC08hemi will be back in 5 years.

@@HemiJB91 Seriously doubt it. The production line tooling is going away - to bring it back and meet new regulation would cost a (a few) hundred million at this point.

@@BC08 come back to this comment in 5 years. 🤡

or a landcruiser LC200 with a fubar transmission. Toyota sucks!!

The GM will likely smoke lifters then main bearings before 100K

@@rameylewis7730I take my chance with Toyota I always own Chevy gmc and ford and al of them have problems with engine transmission at early age

@@BC08 My buddys lifters collapsed at 8k miles, had to wait a month for an engine.

@@OtisFlint Very, very common

You, sir need a 2017 F150 XL, because you just described my 90-year-old dad’s truck.

@@markhavelka4924 I will take a square body Chevy. Fords don’t have great engines. Or 1995 2500 Silverado

Ram made the ram classic which was kinda that idea. Idk if they still do

@@marcpomaville9429 I have never heard of that.

your statement is moronic. Prices haven't changed.

If you towing anywhere near 11k pounds get a HD

If you're towing anything over 8,500lbs you shouldn't have a half ton in the first place

But towing 11750 with 1200 on an F150 is ok?

@@hellkitty1014 maybe for a year or two then it all falls apart

GM, Ford and Ram might be forced to cooperate

and the cost is literally the same as 20 years ago.

Free market. People need to speak with their wallets and not buy them. Only way to force the manufacturers to offer better pricing/incentives

@@GreenMountain565 see above

I have one and unfortunately it does lol

Sir, my V8 Hyundai sounds WAY better than that when it revs.

What is your opinion of the 3.6L V6?

@@Man_in_a_Gucci_Suit It is underpowered for a pickup, but is relatively reliable and easy to service. Keep up with regular maintenance and it will last a long time. My personal Ram has the 5.7 Hemi which is smooth and great for towing. I get about 18 mph on my 50 mile round trip commute. The 3.6 would do a little better mpg, but could not tow my toy hauler.

@@Springfield2016 I was looking at the 2025 Ram Charger is why I ask about the 3.6L

@@Springfield2016 Common follower failures, common timing chain issues. Pentastar is junk

I hate working on a dodge never seen one easy to work on not a fan of dodge yeah there trucks are nice but when it's time to work on it nightmare

It was not professional grade

I purchased a new 1980 F150 Lariat for a little over $8K, a significant price jump from the '75 model I bought new for $4K. The '75 was a base model with a V8, standard transmission, and no AC, while the '80 had a V8, automatic transmission, and AC; both had power steering, power brakes, but lacked power windows or locks, and were 2WD, long bed. In snow country, Fords suffered from rust issues, with salt on the roads corroding the body, chassis, and underparts. The '80 had better quality than the '75, but Ford's overall quality wasn't the best. Now, I own a 1971 F100, which was well-made for its time and remains clean and rust-free, having spent its life in the south. Ford's rust problems were notorious in the late '80s and '90s. Perhaps this was a source of dissatisfaction for your father, along with the introduction of more plastic components, problematic engines like the 5.4 3V in my 2005 model, and uncomfortable seats. However, the newer models seem to be improving in quality. Given their cost, one would hope for continued enhancements in Ford's quality. It's curious whether the trucks they manufacture today will last 50 years like their predecessors.

As long as repair parts are available it can last 100 years

They are as honest as they can be, but if they want to keep getting test vehicles from the manufacturers, they need to say something positive. They were less than glowing about a Subaru and now Subaru won’t talk to them….

@@randykuta5146 sad but true

I miss my '07 Ranger badly.

That era of Ford Ranger was so good. I miss my 2000.

It also didn't have all the safety equipments, all the leather, all the gizmos and things that weigh down modern vehicles. You want big payload, get a 2500 or larger.

make more money

Why are you here? Get to work!

@@cwqrpportable haha im at work right now good point

@@tsu.cameron You have a good day. Prices have gotten crazy for everything.

@@cwqrpportable thanks

Payload on all three is sad, my 2021 Ranger crew cab had more payload...

That's all rams are don't you know?

Everybody knows that the payload rating is for all types of situations, mostly the brakes, all of those trucks will take way more weight than that and be perfectly fine

Ram knows that 90 percent of truck drivers never haul anything heavier than bags of dirt from home Depot

I don't know anyone buying a half ton trying to tow a ton, let alone knowing how to back them up. The half tons look great, able to show off at the golf course, and travel in comfort. If you are towing just go with a 3/4 or 1 ton. The half tons are just a man's SUV is all (marketing towards the man in the relationship)

And 150,000 real world miles with service records to get longevity data, not just warranty period. Show who has the least planned obsolescence built in.

One of the best vehicles to buy for options is a Range Rover. The worst vehicle to buy based on reliability is a 1 year old Range Rover.😂

you shouldn't reproduce because your post makes absolutely no sense

​@@spec1923another moronic post. 150K miles about the designated lifetime.

@@davidporter7051 you can accept but I do not have to. I have always put around 200,000 with minor repairs.

The Hurricane is based on the Alfa Romeo Giorgio 4-cylinder. It’s a true Fiat engine. The Hurricane will prove to be junk. Mark my words

The hurricane ho. Gonna drink the gas. And if you tow with it, its gonna guzzle the gas. Tow over 7k don't go 1/2 ton start at 3/4 ton and diesel engine. The chevy 1500 3.0 diesel is a great truck but heavy loads I go 3/4 duramax at 975lbs of torque.

@@ericj810 Ain't nobody buyin the HO. The base one is the what's going to get used, and no need to buy a HD truck if you don't tow all the time. The standard 3.0 will be fine. Buncha guys lying to their wives and stealing from their kids' futures to buy 3/4 and 1-ton trucks for weekend playing.

Just get a Chevy or ford V8 delete the 4 cylinder mode and put a Boris exhaust on it then

24 feet is a long truck

You can or can't go wrong with any of them. Meaning they are all awesome trucks, but they all can have serious issues as well.

​@@plmn93That's the unfortunate truth. On paper and probably for the majority of people driving these trucks they're built pretty well, they'll probably be reliable, and they'll probably last a long while But a bad dice roll for any given one of them brand new off the lot can be an unexpected nightmare. The thing about research online is that you're going to see way more horror stories compared to people who are satisfied with the vehicle. Because you're far more likely to be vocal if something's going wrong. Not that you shouldn't be vocal with something's going wrong, but I would wager it is still ultimately the minority

you realize this is a channel which does mostly new pickup reviews? You should only watch Dave Ramsey so he can preach you are a poor worthless peasant and you should live like one.

Lawyers* all of these trucks are underrated on payload by at least 30%

They have long had terrible payloads. Coil springs typically can't support as much weight because they connect to a single point on the frame, while leaf springs spread out that weight over a few feet. This is also why air springs are a bad idea on a leaf sprung vehicle. You are focusing a high load on a part of the frame that wasn't designed for it.

@@plmn93 Doesnt the raptor use coils and has more payload than the ram? I think there is more that factors into than just the coils. New tundra went from leafs to coils and saw an increase in payload. So there are definitely other factors

@@YerBoyTroy Yes there are other factors, but with all else being equal, leaf springs are going to be able to handle more weight which is why they have been used in trucks for so long.

​@@plmn93 To be fair ram knows their user base. I would say a higher percentage of owners benefit from the increased unladen ride stability vs max payload capabilities. Most folks in fullsizes these days aren't utilitizing the max payload often

The cost of ownership for the LZO option, diesel fuel, maintenance, and def quickly negate the MPG. Not even including the cost to replace the belt driven oil pump at the 100k recommended interval.

@@murrkem8239the oil pump belt service interval is 200k fyi.

​@@murrkem8239belt replacement is now at 150k miles

@@murrkem8239 the belt driven oil pump is 200k interval. GM did say that 100k would probably include a fuel pump replacement though and that is also on the back of the engine. The LZ0 is pretty much universally agreed to be awesome though. I could understand getting the 6.2 if you wanted to buy an aftermarket supercharger or something down the line but the ECU isn't even tunable yet afik.

@@murrkem8239Where I live diesel is only 40 cents more than 87, and the def consumption is next to nothing unless you’re towing a lot, and it’s cheap when you do get it. I only need to fill it every 5k miles or so. My drive to work is mostly highway and I get around 24 mpg in an at4. Would recommend the LZO to people considering a gm

It's a demo.

I can't believe after all these videos they still brake torque them! Just floor it and it's way faster off the line

So true. I see a bunch of the 6.2 powered trucks where I live and they are definitely way faster than what they got. Even my old 2012 Silverado is the same way. If you brake torque it, it's slow, but if you just punch it it's much quicker.

It's still slow as shit...just goes to show that V8's aren't necessary today. You're basically paying for the sound which is stupid.

@@ducktails1695 5.4 seconds to 60 without brake torquing is slow then i guess so. If you don’t believe me. Check car and driver and also motor trend. I myself have a high country with this engine so i know from personal experience that it’s quicker than this. I’m sure you probably drive a civic si or something. lol

@@jcrews3 Sure....I bet you really got 5.4 seconds lol. Good one!

I bought a 2017 F150 xlt supercab a year ago as I was planning on getting a new truck but didn’t like what I saw at the prices they were at! I absolutely love this truck with the 5.0 as it’s such a pleasure to drive! It has everything that I was looking for in a truck and nothing that I didn’t want! It also has a payload rating of 1958 lbs.

it's just Ram quality. They fooled a lot of people with an upscale plastic interior but Ram has never been the best built truck.

Boring zzzzz

Wow that's great! You just grossly overpaid for a midsized truck. Congratulations! I get it, full size truck are over priced, just like most vehicles at this point. But, if there's one group of vehicles that are ridiculously overpriced for what they are it's mid size trucks! Great job my guy! You just paid 63k for a mid size truck lmao😅!!!! You could have has a full size well equipped elevation or something for the same price! You paid 63k for a dinky truck hahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahaha

Should’ve got A Maverick imo Only reasonably priced truck rn

@Sir_Mack 52K. Like I said...expensive. But the same features in a FS would go close to 90K. Handles better...easier to get around town...fun to drive. I'm pretty happy. If you don't have the money, keep driving your Prius, lad. Maybe you should be watching videos about old shitboxes, and not new trucks.

@@Man_in_a_Gucci_Suit A MAVERICK!! 😄 🤣

@MrHand-ih4sz you have no clue what I drive and you wouldn't believe me if I told you anyway so. Enjoy your 60k overpriced dinky truck bud

I always custom order my trucks; the dealers always add BS to the lot trucks to increase the profit\asking price and I end up paying less by ordering exactly what I want, even if they are offering a slightly bigger discount on a lot vehicle. In this case, having the 7.2kw as an option makes more sense then increasing the whole line by $400 and making it standard.

That being said, any dealer that skips the 7.2kw option is an idiot.

@@Cloud30000 yuuup. & bedliners! For whatever reason, fords around me never have them. Every GM dealer has their trucks bed lined. I don’t get it lol.

You can always order your truck the way you want . Ford is cheap that’s why they don’t add stuff as a mandated thing that hikes the price as some may not want it but most will then you pay which makes prices competitive but really it’s bull. it’s up to the dealer to option out or add stuff then charge what they want for lot trucks upon allocation. This is why it makes sense to make your own orders as the other gentleman suggested above.

Ford is cheap!!!!😂 cheap made and then nickel and dime you to death for every little option you want.

Good for sheet metal, but the Ford still has a steel frame, rear axle and some suspension components

@@BC08 yeah and all that takes is spray some fluid film on the frame once a year. I have never had a problem with a frame getting anymore than surface rust.

Was the 3.6L V6 reliable atleast? I wouldn’t buy a hemi

@@Man_in_a_Gucci_Suit The Pentastar 3.6 is a massive hunk of crap

of course. Anyone with a pulse could say this

No shit, you have a platinum. Platinum seats are different to the rest.

@@HemiJB91 Yea no shit, that was exactly my point. I commented about the seats they said were uncomfortable in the Lariat and said I noticed the same. Thanks for letting me know that my seats are different 👍

@@cjsaint09 welcome 🤡

Funny thing about seats, they change so much over the years and not always for the better. After 12 trucks my hands down favorite seats were the captain seats in my 93 F-250. I later had a 2001 F-250 with captain seats and they were crap. After that had a 2006 Silverado 2500, those seats were quite comfortable. I now have a 2018 F-150 and the seats are so so. Something to be said of old big Buicks from the early 80's, they were always comfortable.

Seats are very subjective. Fords have always been some of the best for me, but some of that is just how they tend to position the seats.

I have a 2018 F150 with leather and the seats in my 2004 Expedition are so much more comfortable

Yes many fords have been doing this since around 2015 as far back as I am aware.

@@alexnelson09 wow, you know, I just wouldn't feel like a man if my pickup truck had to use its stereo to make vroom vroom noises lol

@@MegaBlackley I think it started when then put the 4 cylinder turbo in the mustang. Then they just couldn’t stop

They started putting 4 cylinders in mustangs in 84 with the mustang SVO fox body. Don’t think they used the stereo then to amplify. Probably around 2015 because I don’t remember anything prior to that.

@@joshreynolds729 first 4cyl was in 74. First turbo 4 cyl was 79. I test drove the 79 back in the day. It was very used and very much a dog.

None of em

Even the Toyota fanboys are suddenly silent on that, lol. The fact is that ALL modern trucks are full of expensive technology that can be very expensive to repair.

Titan 😂

Sadly it's in its final production year and discontinued after 2024!​@@Drg24800

Most reliable truck made in the last 15 years 15-17 5.0 F150. Yes, it’s also more reliable than the 5.7 Tundra

At near sea level, the 5.0 F150 is best overall half-ton going.

@@BC08Absolutely!

America would say differently

#1 truck sold

@@richardtellez00tellez77 #1 truck sold would be GM. Chevy and gmc sell more than ford do. Ford has been in decline for last 5 years since they moved to these smaller engines and electric. GMC and Chevy use same engines, same drivetrains, same parts, just different interiors, but made by same company. So America seems to be buying v8s and diesels more than stupid unrealible turbo 6 and electric trucks

@@richardtellez00tellez77 that schooling is free. You are welcome

@@richardtellez00tellez77 830k GM trucks sold 2023 vs 750k ford trucks and the gap is growing.

Does the f150 have any problems so far?

@@Man_in_a_Gucci_Suit nope

I have a 2017 XLT and the interior still looks like it’s brand new! 5.0 and it purrs like a kitten!

You obviously are full of crap! there is no boot in the Ram limited with the dial shifter!

Exactly. Most people are going to hit the payload limit before the tow limit. That's why Tundras and Tacomas were so worthless for so long, they had absolutely pathetic payloads. Oh, and the rule is 10-15%, so you were being generous.

Load distributing hitch. Allows for towing heavier trailer weights.

@@danielkampfhenkel7993 weight distribution hitches DO NOT increase the payload or towing capability of a vehicle.

@@nathanlewis3462they do decrease felt tongue weight allowing you to be able to tow max trailer weight for that vehicle. GVWR is GVWR, you’re correct. I own a RAM and yes their payload sucks in comparison, but I still love it.

Same thing for Ford. 11,000 tow capability. However, assuming 10% tongue weight, 1100 lbs from 1284 lbs= 184 lbs for a driver and nothing else. That means that if Andre or Nathan were to tow this Ford at max tow capacity, neither one could legally drive it!

Whistling Diesel?

yeah give these trucks to Whistling Diesel haha

WD :)

My customer had the rear window seal fail and mildew his entire interior from Rain

That video would be short. None of them

Why?