I love your videos!

Where can I buy that hoodie?

What do you think about cat diesel engines vs Cummins.

My bronco ll has 493,673.3 miles on it

Chevrolet s10 was in The Last of Us

Thanks bro my dream car is a lot of cars it’s probably mostly laguna sega

I don't usually see people like you too often. Thank bro,I wish the same for you.

I need a Toyota Land Cruiser.

Toyota GR Corolla hatchback for me. I wish it's the first car I buy soon.

Thanks bro. For now I'll take any car at all. Habing to pay for uber to get groceties or medicine is making it impossible to save up for a car.

Ranger,mine was a 94 and had 198000 miles and ran great, then a storm blew a tree over on it and totaled it out

I had 2006 ranger its was a warrior😊

@@user-qs2vs6ji4b I still daily mine to work,im at 507,000+ miles! Blows my mind!

i work with a bunch of guys that drive old rangers and mazdas as their dailies. i work at a rock quarry so most guys buy high mileage beaters to drive to work. the rock dust will scratch the piss out of paint. those old rangers are like roaches, you cant kill them. they will be the last thing on the planet once we all go extinct. I learned how to drive on a old late 80s 5 speed ranger.

@@BadaBing_BadaBoop I've always run a work rat, old asphalt paving guy. Dirty and stinky, if it's not the asphalt its the diesel fuel and I know all about quarry dust! Lol I bought this truck 13 years ago with 223,000 miles for $1400 I'm at 509,000 miles as I'm writing this 💯🔥💪🇺🇲 in

Yep. Pretty much

Worst truck ever bro wtf....you got lucky

I would put my 2004 6.0 Ford cat motor against any of the old boys and most of the newer trucks odometer reads 443,829 miles currently. Got it in 2018 and haven’t spent more than 1k in parts

@@shuruff904 people now a days want a truck with all those fancy features. I once had a Titan, it was such a basic truck. 180k miles. Truck felt very reliable and the 5.6 had lots of power. I sold it cause the truck was very boring. Now have a 2013 raptor it’s a way better truck with comfort and features. Bigger price tag too. when it comes to doing truck things the Titan can do the same but at a fraction of the cost 😂

​@@shuruff904 no. They had issues the first few years but after that they are bulletproof.

@@Shitnugget69 put a cover on the back though, and those butt ugly Titans become Amazon delivery trucks....at least the older crappy ones looked decent enough to sell....Nissan-Mitsubishi-[insert name of parent company here] is struggling badly...

They would run out of gas, and have to be refueled to blow them up. I can't believe how much of a debacle cfc was, and now everyone is paying for it.

yep the 4.9s are way overbuilt, some were even industrially used as stationary power generators.. think 80s mercedes

@@fsouzajr I know about the power station thing. Power Nation here.on KZfaq uploaded their 300 i6 build not too long ago and they started with one of those power station 300's

We had an 83 F100 with the 300 i6. My grandpa bought it new, towed a camper all over the country as a traveling preacher, sold it to my stepdad with over 200K miles on it, stepdad drove it (beat the hell out of it) for another 200K+ and the transmission finally died.

I heard that some of the Expeditions would lockup temporarily then would cool down and restart. Per mechanic at a Toyota dealership.

I was looking to buy one 8 years ago and I read the same things so I bought a full size 5.7 and have done nearly nothing to it. The full size v-8s are always better.

Sounds like a good vehicle in your shoes🤑🤑

I heard for the s10 you need the later one with the 5.3 v8 but still if you can score a deal on a 1500 or 2500 that would be a better buy

That Suzuki engine?

I just bought an old S10 blazer...had to do everything on your list and more.

Mines at 280k and also still running well. Only issue I’ve had recently was with the door not wanting to open

Unfortunately around here most of them rusted away years ago

I drive a Pathfinder D21 V6 3.0 petrol, 326606 kms on it. Original engine, works absolutely fine, doesn't use any oil, love it

​@jeffersongarcia8257 dude my interior door handle on mine takes like 7 pulls to open

Crashed my 97 with only 170k on it 😢 miss it everyday. Was such a good truck

I don't put it down to just 'money'. They are getting feedback on 90-day old and 12-month old vehicles, and looking at the 'small stuff' you mentioned. If you want to get the nicer of the brand new cars, and you're going to sell it in 3-4 years, that's what JD Powers is most useful for.

"JD POWA-" "Don't touch me"!

They lost me with the ridgeline. It's a CAR with a lid-less trunk.

Subarus are known for not being reliable so I wouldn’t be surprised of anything being above them

Never quite understood why JD Power glosses over Mazda, the Skyactiv engines are probably the most reliable direct injection engines out there and Mazda has the best interiors outside of a luxury brand. And they also manage to make even the pedestrian CX-5 feel like a sporty, luxury SUV for probably less money OTD than a CR-V or RAV4

Tried to import one but they wouldn't allow it at the time. Sucks

There was a letter that USSOCOM sent to Toyota because they had imported some of the Tacomas into Afghanistan and in the letter they praised Toyota's reliability. They claimed the Tacoma withstood absolutely everything that was literally thrown at it, including RPGs and it never broke down once.

Yep 👍 I worked in Afghanistan for over 6 years , those Toyota Hilux pickups were indestructible, literally bullet proof. And here’s a bonus ( how about those Kawasaki Mules ! ) those things took neglect and punishment like I’ve never seen before and you couldn’t kill em’ !

Hahaha you ain't lying. I saw the ANA get hit by two, IEDs, and still repurpose the truck after they towed it. Replace the axle, and the rear drive shaft. No truck bed left and nothing left of the bed.

You just have to watch out for those 1989 Toyota Corollas. They tend to blow up a lot. Lol

late 90s were tanks... the earlier, non-turbo diesels.. not so much.

@@NXT_LVL they may have had less power than their turbo successors but those old 7.3 idi motors were very reliable

Yes sir. We ran a 7.3 for our construction company. It had over 300k miles o it, bagged two deer, hauled tools/materials daily, through Seattle and Portland traffic as well as the outback with NO engine issues, ever. Then that stupid kid thought he had room to make a left turn.. RIP our diesel work horse.

​@Billy Reece agreed. Had many 7.3s thry were more reliable than any Powerstroke versions but the power was terrible.

My daily driver 97 powerstroke has 400k on it and is totally reliable. Never leaves me stranded.

What happened to the Power Wagon name? Is it still in use in the US? It’s an awesome branding option.

@Ben D Geddes When Ram was separated from The original Dodge it went away.

That 401 is an AMC engine. International Harvester used AMC engines in some applications.

@Walt Moore you have that backwards. AMC was not producing many of their own parts. They cut deals with others to build their products for awhile. I took a 401 out of an old international grain truck and put into a 1974 Jeep Cherokee. I had a 1976 J10 that had a blown engine and used parts out of a Ford 360 to get it back on the road. AMC in the 60's and 70's was struggling and using a lot of parts from other manufacturers. You could bolt Ford and International parts right in with no modifications or very few.

@@desertdan100 external parts yes, not rotating parts. Starters,water pump, alternator. I've worked on a lot of AMC and IH trucks.

2011?

@@quasitoantrax Yes. The last year of production for the last generation of the Ranger

I’m no ranger fan but I do know people who’ve gotten 200k+ out of them and other ford products. That seems pretty good from my perspective for anything.

I nearly bought a Ranger in 2005 and regret it. What put me off was the untried 2.5 diesel. It was a new engine replacing the previous 2.6 gas found in the Courier. Don't know if they did have problems but after 8 years I never sore them on the road. They didn't seem to last.

@@2DogsVlogs I’ve never owned or ever heard of a diesel engine in a Ranger. The most durable engine in the Ranger was the 2.3L naturally aspirated gasoline engine. We’ve own 2 of them with the 2.3L. The first one we put over 500K miles on it and the second one we put almost 700K miles on it. Back then we changed the oil every 3K miles with conventional Valvoline motor oil. We now change our oil every 6 months (which is only about 1,500 miles) with Valvoline full synthetic (high mileage) oil, even though our Ranger has only 36K original miles. We change the oil on our Subaru’s every 5K miles with Valvoline full synthetic (high mileage) oil. My wife’s Outback has less than 30K miles and my Forester just hit 13K miles. High mileage oil has additives that reduce engine wear.

I’ll be happy to be first in line when it needs a new home.

Ranger's 2.3L I4 engine was designed by Mazda for Ford.

My second vehicle is a 2022 Toyota Supra. My primary vehicle is a 1988 K1500 chevy with over 700,000 miles on the chassis (LS3) ( second engine and rebuilt transmission) Still runs great. The usefulness of a truck for me means I have always owned a truck even when I could afford only one vehicle.

GMC used to be King. You got a good generation. Todays GMCs are garbage. Overpriced, too chromy (especially the trucks) and their Gear box is awkward af

@@johnappleseed9290They aren’t bad, all new vehicles aren’t as good as they used to be…

How many transmissions have you gone through? It is rare for a Chevy transmission to last more than 150,000 miles. Dodge Dakota was a piece of junk. One was lucky to get 100,000 miles out of them without a major repair. Few of those lasted past 175,000 miles before being junked. Ford Ecoboost engines are nowhere nearly as reliable as the 5.0 V8 Coyote. The second generation 5.0, which was sold from 2015 to 2017, may have been the most reliable pickup engine ever made. Then Ford messed it up in 2018.....

@@herbb8547 Doubt he’s been through a lot, there’s tons of Chevys with over 200k on their stock transmissions. Especially the older gmt800s very reliable trucks.

@Wesley Garrison I was thinking of the half ton Silverado 1500. The 2500 has a heavier transmission. Everyone I know with a 1500 needed a new transmission by 150,000 miles. Some a lot sooner if they didn't maintain them properly or if they pulled in over drive. It amazes me how so many don't understand what "Tow Mode" is.

I'm the same with 96-98 5.7 Chevy, had good luck with several in a row. The 07-08 were ok, not quite as good. Actually was eyeballing a sr5 the other day, might be nice to drive something different.

@@kingpest13 I had a '90 Silverado for a decade, had no issues until 185,000, then within a few months the transmission and engine needed rebuilding. Also owned a '97 and 2010. The '97 was old when I got it but it was a solid rig. The 2010 was a lemon. I've had all Toyota since 2012, zero issues with any of them, from two Corollas, a 2002 Tundra, a 2018 Camry, 2010 Tundra, 2010 Camry, 2019 Tundra. We still own all but the Corollas, they were just kid & work cars. Haven't had a mechanical issue with any of them. I still love the old squarebodies & 88-98 Chevy trucks. I have two 5.7 SR5 TRD 4x4 extended cabs now, 300,000 on the 2010 and it pulls my lawn care trailer all season, zero issues or complaints. The '19 is still our going to town rig, but it'll eventually be making us money like the other ones. Not trying to slam GM at all just stating my experiences.

Mostly twinky trucks on this list

Nope the 12 valve Cummins is number one what a ford fanatic you are but I could agree 7.3 is second

The 06 duramax and 08 toyota tundra are in the million mile club, if i had that many miles on an engine i would be reporting it to them, toyota gave the guy who got to 1 million miles a brand new tundra for free

@@LizCal-yp3jr ...what about the KDP???? Buddy with an old 5.9 Cummins Power Wagon had the KDP and the motor instantly swallowed all 12 valves! SO much for 1st place! 😂😂🤣🤣😂😂

@@jamesbasye2362 ...funny! Toyota gives a million mile Tundra owner a new one when there's almost 500 'million-milers' on the 7.3 forum! 🤣😂

My brother and I spent many years trying to kill a ‘93 Mighty Max. We finally donated it to a church. I’m sure it’s still going.

I have a 92. Multiport injection 2.4 and 5 speed. Starts when it shouldn’t, as long as it has battery, no matter how cold it is. Even taught all three kids to drive manual in it. Never expected it to still be here.

1957 gm 3 on the tree rules

Definitely not on original motor and transmission

Yes original motor on both, u cant kill them. Even running out of oil the engine wont turn over. Uses oil pressure to fire the injectors. One had thr 4r100 trans and was rebuilt twice. The other was a ZF and original

You’re lucky with your 4l60e, my 05 had a little over 100k on it and decided to take a shit while I was headed home. Lost 3rd & 4th. Now the 80e was way more reliable and that’s why people would switch them out if they could. As for manual transmissions most companies don’t even really offer them, at least not here in the states, which I find ridiculous but a lot of it is because this new generation doesn’t want to try and learn to drive it.

o2 chev crew 2500 hd 6.0 NV standard, like a 7.62 sks, wont let you down

That “dodge” was a rebadged Mitsubishi. My first vehicle and I miss it everyday

Good Ole slant six, The Leaning Tower of Power.. great engine, difficult to kill those old girls..

i had 1 with 4x4 put 300,000 on it when the tranny went, up graded to a f150 and still wish i had the dakota ,the were a big little truck , much more comfortable to sit in.

@@davemcewen9991 big little truck👍

Had one. Blew the tranny at 80k. Had professionally rebuilt. Blew again at 160k. Had it rebuilt again. At 230k it was shifting poorly again and sold it. Everything else held up well. Was getting rusty the last few yrs as all vehicles in the Midwest.

@@markneukirch577 1992 had a 5 speed manual had to changed clutch at 120k also changed water pump around then . clutch was failing again at 198k and gave it away I could have gotten another 50k easily tho.

Could not agree with you more - Ive got a dakota with the 4.7 in it and even after moving up several tire sizes it lost NONE of its power or throttle response. Crank shaft and cam shaft sensors were replaced and the truck is insanely reliable. Its 4x4 prowess is insane - I know I can depend on it at ANY given time. I have jumped hills and it lands like it was built for it - 75mph on Klevar 265s 75 15s on dirt roads no issue - 35 mph offroad easy - will not get you stuck in mud or sand unless its you who did it. I loved that truck so much I bought a dodge durango - same generation with the 4.7 except this ones AWD and this impresses the heck out of me. Gave it a 2 inch life, 275 75 18s, 2 chamber muffler exhaust - also insane prowess in mud and rough terrain. Tons of room in it for taking the family literally anywhere at any given time. This also starts up every time, I should upgrade sensors while Im thinking about it - only weak spot is ball joints but I have spares. At no point do I ever feel worried Im going to be stranded, or cant go somewhere because of weather. The transfer case output shafts must be made of tungsten or something - because you literally cant put enough force on the system to break it. Rock freaking solid. Ive owned rams, fords and chevies - I wont buy chevys anymore because of the transmissions but my trucks both have 200k on them and transmissions are shifting like they should even after everything I put them through. Cant say enough things, I love that Im seeing more and more dakotas in my area where people are putting money and upgrades into them. I think I started a thing in my local town.

THAT 5.7 CHRYSLER MOTOR IS A SCREAMER. IT IS SO FAST IT WILL SCARE YOU. I MEAN FAST AND HOLDS TOGETHER.

@@crazyhorseaz5224 ...and I've heard they STILL don't oil very well when they're idling. 🤔

They moved to the newer generation ecoboost because of the success they were having with their regular F-150s...they realized how much they could actually get out of the ecoboost engine and still keep it reliable.

They are known for having the weakest frames ever lol

@@garrettspivey not really when you're not jumping them 10 feet in the air

@@danamullins2723 the eco isn't bad but it isn't close to the NA 6.2. It can't be

Check out the new 2500 Rebel. Doesn't quite have all the PW offroad goodies though

Don’t know if I’d switch out a Tacoma for a diesel unless you need a much bigger truck. No matter how good the 06 dmax are; they won’t hold a candle to a Tacoma in year over year repair costs

@@justinmartin8887 sometimes you just WANT the bigger truck haha doesn't always have to be a need

Man you’re lucky I got an 05 with the same engine and it started to rattle due to low oil pressure before 200,000 miles. I was worried I would blow the engine at some point if I didn’t go in an repair it, but my transmission decided to blow before…

The 3 valve will last but only with strict following of basic maintenance, change and check the oil every 3k miles, with synthetic oil, and high quality oil filters. I have seen them with over 300k and still running great. Most don’t make it past a 150k before trouble starts.

@@alexgrindnshine2522 exactly

Mines ran good with no issues and I’m at bout 213,000

Save your money judgement day is coming 😂

Yeah when he said power strokes weren’t so reliable I’m like has he ever heard of the 7.3. Which for all intents and purposes was maybe the most reliable diesel in heavy duty trucks and would easily go 1m miles. They may not have had the power gain capabilities from tuning and go fast goodies of the Cummins or duramax but I’d take it over any of them. It does what it’s suppose to do.

@@billyreece4445 you can tell he's just a hater

All original?

Tundra pulls 10k pounds and goes to 1 million miles on original motor and transmission

@@isaacgonzales3347 hahaha. Thats all ?? Those f250s can tow twice that all day. That Toyota isn't able to carry the weight those Ford work trucks carry. Not even close. And they aren't going "a million miles" either, shut that crap up. Those "Toys" can't carry the tools our work trucks carry. There's a reason I've NEVER seen any of our contractors buying Toys trucks to use as a work truck.

I thought you said tundras don’t go to 1 million miles original motor and transmission, i proved your wrong ! Your said f250 tows twice as much, 2022 tundra tows 12k, 2022 f250 tows 12k, (not twice as much). Ford is know for not being reliable, this is a statistical fact. You are a ford fan boy peasant, This we know for certain

Good old R12 refrigerant. Had a 92 Celica that blew ice cold. It would freeze you out in 100 degree weather! None of these new vehicles cool like older ones with R12.

the biden broncos shoulda been called donkos?,they only made real 1s 66-96 R.I.P. LOVE MY 92 CUSTOM!!!!!!!

40k on my ‘21. Just maintenance.

Stay on the timing belt 😊

Mercedes has got a pickup truck to offer too.

@@deller5924 if you're thinking of the X Class, that's just a rebadged Nissan Navara...with a Renault engine.

@@damilolaakanni Oh! I didn't know that. Thanks, mate!

That $1000.00 is what you expect to pay for most timing belt work.

That thing can go 1mm miles. At your rate, it’ll 70-80 more years haha

I've the 2003 TRD 4X4, just rolled 200K. Love this truck. Looking at the timing belt/water pump job. And a bunch of other stuff to do.

@@pennmikael only 1 problem, I'm almost 75. I'll have to give it to my grandson.

I just bought a 2004 with 273k last month and just changed the timing belt for the same price and my mechanic said it was the original timing belt which is absolutely insane to me that it lasted that long but feel immaculate and I plan on keeping her alive another 15-20 years I’m hoping

4.3 V6 was as a quick truck

@@youtubecarspottersguide1 ur right about that. i own the V6 variant :)

Yes, there was nothing Mitsubishi in the Dakota/Durango line.

I have an 08 f150 pushing 300k. While these engines are susceptible to poor maintenance, if you use premium synthetic and change every 5000 miles, they can last well over 400k. I know of several fleet vehicles where the oil was changed religiously that have well over 400k. Carbon build up is what caused the problems. Super pro tip. Keep your foot out of it and keep clean oil in it, they are excellent engines.

@Brian Jake Gaming S 10 is the best Chevy ever made. 1500 from 88-97 comes 2nd. I've owned all 3 and my F 150 justifies why it's the best selling truck of all time, and the #1 Most sold vehicle in general in the US. Chevy fan boys hate that big ass pill to swallow. I understand tho. U owned an Avalanche, didn't u? Or maybe a Colorado? You have fake "vintage" Chevrolet tin signs in your garage, don't u? Maybe a bowtie tattoo?

There was an 86 f150 stright 6 that had 550,000+ miles that just would sit at my shop but we drove chevy express for work trucks. All guys beat the fucking balls off them. Would them so low on oil for so long. There was an 01 , 03 , 05 that all still run as back ups and new guys trucks. The 05 is an everyday truck and needed a transmission rebuild that costed 3k which was cheap around here for that work. I just picked up a 2014 f150 5.0 with 100k miles as my personal. Both chevy and Ford make some good vehicles. If I didn't see those chevy express vans with the Spartans box body get the absolute balls beaten off them and run 99% of the times I'd hate on chevys all day lol.

The old 4cyl rangers (the twin spark SOHC ones) do it routinely

My gmt 400 has about 633,000km and it still running strong and is still on the stock engine and 4l60 that being said I the Trans has been slightly modified with a shift kit and a bigger trans cooler but that’s about it

E150 with a 4.6, 670k, and ran like a champ, but the floor started to rust out. Edit: only one spark plug change, and when I say it ran like a champ, I mean you'd think it had maybe 150k on it.

🤔

LBZ and LLY are NOT the same at all, other than the basic block design and a few shared parts. Most of the engine is very different. If you really knew about the Duramax, you'd know why everyone wants the LBZ over the LLY

@@Chevtec that's pretty much the difference. Less emission components, and a different tune/parts. And the LBZ is easier to work with and has the cp3 pump instead of cp4 (I think the lly has). And yes, they are the same engines, same size, same exact blocks, just minor things changed on them.

I own a 1994 4.2 landcruiser 80 series

BS on "popped turbos"

Coyote v8 has issues too

It won’t ever break down if you keep up with maintenance

dont wait for it to break sell it now, it will be worth less if it breaks.

Therw are two million mile tundras with that same 4.7 v8 with no repairs done to the engine, and these trucks hauled and towed well over their rated capacities. They were hotshot trucks for the oilfield. Keep the timing belts changed and it will last forever.

@@Jackmerius_Tacktheretrix i believe there are 3 now and 1 Tacoma, original motor and transmission, 1 million miles

forever if you take care of it.

Ya, 6.4 could have a bunch of power(high rail pressure), but that thing was a garbage heap. When it failed it failed massively. Its an extremely expensive engine to fix, if it could be fixed. At least the 6.0 could be fixed and could be made decently reliable, but Fuc* the 6.4

Ya fuck the 6.4 that's the biggest POS

@@SwingArmCity yea, my dad had an 08 king ranch 6.4 and we deleted it at 130k and luckily after it was an extremely solid truck with great power. We sold it at 170k with no issues in between then other than an up pipe leak. To my knowledge the truck is still running strong

@@ethanhenneberry2625 When it goes bad ( and it will) its going to be $$$$ to fix, maybe a new motor.

Cant beat the old 7.3's IMOH.

The thing is most trucks are driven hard and have high mileage and show reliability. I had a Toyota T100 and used hard daily. Had a stakebed and had a load most of the time. 450,000 miles original engine, tranny and clutch. It was driven hard daily

The truck will rust out around that engine until it falls out. Then gets turbocharged in an fbody junkyard swap and runs for years at 600hp.

Agreed I have a 2008 2500hd never had an issue well over 200k miles....

@@JakeArmyRetired They are pretty bulletproof!. I have a brother that bought an 05 with under a 100k now hes got like 400k on it, And he uses it as a plow truck during the Winter! Never had a single issue.

35,000 from 600k 2012 6.0

​@@freddiecliburn9711 so, 565,000?

What year is yours? Mine's a '97 GMC with the same engine and tranny and close to 300, 000 kilometers (Canadian miles).

@@jimervin1637 Well, it a '95 which replaces my last truck, also 4.3 motor. In this case a '97 Chev that was a former ATT&T truck. I believe I got something like 275 before the automatic trans began failing so I parked it at my first wife's place and use it for parts. The truck ran great but used a quart of oil a week which was not so bad considering I drove about 400 miles at the time and that was cheaper than buying a new motor, but the worst problem was water/antifreeze consumption--you had to check and add every day. The damn thing had a cracked block but kept right on ticking!!

1996 gmc Sierra 4.3 700r4 transmission.. approaching 700 000 kms.. ( Canada 🇨🇦).. the body is starting to go though, unfortunately..

@@h8troodoh Well, mine ain't no beauty queen--Typical cab corner rust and a dented fender, but this little truck is terrific.

@@RC-ml3ne mine either,she's suffering from a typical Canadian climate, cab corners,etc,all starting to go,but agreed they're good Ole trucks..