10-15 years ahead of the competition!!!

​You are 20 to 30 years short on your estimate. 😮😅😂😂

@@gilbertsmith3087 what country do you represent??

​@@Optionsforall:THE 🇺🇸 USA WE ARE DECADES AHEAD OF EVERYONE, DOUBT IT AT YOUR OWN RISK. 😮😢😅😂😂

You just had to add that didn't you. 10 -15 is closer on weapons at the time of when then first go into production. The B-52 is about 80 years out of date now but was almost cutting edge when released. So there's quibbling about dates is just silly.@@gilbertsmith3087

lol ho ho ho. No way. They are so vulnerable to the newly developed countermeasures. People used to say the attack helicopter was the end of every fighting vehicle on the modern battlefield. Now every infantry section carries RBS 70 NG. MANPADS or Starstreak Anti-Aircraft Guided Missile System. Go ask the russian and ukrainian orcs how that has turned out.

@@gusgone4527 your manpad shot down the drone, you lost. Your manpad didn't shoot down the drone, you lost big.

HRVATSKA je kupila Bradly IFV. jako dobra stvar. ALI MORA KUPITI novi Abrams X Nove Abrams X model je najbolji novi tenk na svijetu. I još 150 komada KF 51 tenk iz Njemačke. ALI novi Abrams X ne ima nosi novi top iz Njemačkig KF 51. kalibar 130mm.

@@zlatkodzakula8626 jibber jabber tosh bladder.

@@gusgone4527 CROATIA bought Bradly IFV. very good thing. BUT MUST BUY the new Abrams X The new Abrams X model is the best new tank in the world. And another 150 pieces of KF 51 tanks from Germany. BUT the new Abrams X does not have a new cannon from the German KF 51 caliber 130mm. Croatia must buy new armor. Croatia has a border with Serbia. We know that Serbia is allied with Putin and Russia. This is the reason why he has to buy a new tank. It must defend the EU's eastern borders. (Excuse me for my bad English)

Lol

That y America will have a hard time fighting a long war,the cost.

Updates...

@@martinrasmussen7754 still kicking butt

3 loaded

Why? What makes you believe in an army that has never won a war on its own since the Mexico war

@@user-qx6iw3sx2l - Politics. Different story on the ground.

@@MiltonFindley you need to go get some help or write In your own language as you make absolutely no sense at all 🤯

@@user-qx6iw3sx2l - I wrote a doctoral dissertation and survived several firefights. My guess is that you haven't done either.

Vietnamese had to fight from caves never on a battlefield.

Let’s get real here. If the US was like Russia or China we could flatten the majority of the countries in the world. We just rarely do that . We go in and try n put governments back together which never works. Our military would never get the green light if they didn’t try. Ok here is one time that we 100% was not ready for our enemy. Vietnam in the beginning hit us with them underground tunneling systems that killed n wounded so many of our troops. They slowed our push forward and the terrain there was probably one of their biggest weapons against us. However, by the end of the war we started destroying tunnels and just flattening cities. Inevitably by time we figured out how to fight them and the change in political structures along with American citizens rioting and protesting in the streets we no longer had an agenda worth fighting for. The read we lost that war was not bc they killed and destroyed us as much as the fight was far more taxing on the battlefield, pockets, at home and to our political image to continue with what we had to do to continue. I can’t remember what the amount was but u can google it. Once we seen how tough the tunnels were we dropped 1000’s of 1000 lb bombs destroying whole networks of tunnels n cities. It had become savage!

Thanks to the biden administration

Should of never went and better they left....2 trillion could of been used better...

Can’t be impressed if you’re ignorant

@@haroldayat2066well, thank you.

If you had been there you would have realized they were impressed and fearful of our weapons. That's why they rarely made frontal attacks.

@@Bronco46tube how do you know I was not there? Obviously, they won the war without frontal attacks or high tech weapons. We are the ones who left the battlefield (rightfully so) along with our allies and the Soviets. We had 20 years and numerous troop surges to defeat them and failed to do it. Empires go there to die.

​@@haroldayat2066no you are the one that is ignorant hahaha

A MUCH MORE RIGOROUS K-12 PRIMARY EDUCATIONAL SCHOOL SYSTEM IN ASIA, INDIA, EASTERN EUROPE, AND MANY MORE HAVE made these countries enormously powerful and great. Early RIGEROUS CHILDHOOD EDUCATION MAKES A STRONG country. Not, tattoos, dinted colorful hair, dirty beards, overweight Americans.

The US needs weapons to help keep Democracy alive in as many countries as possible. When did you serve,. What was your MOS? Where did you get you information from? It doesn't't like personal experience.

@@Bronco46tubelet’s be honest, us needs them to bully and oppress other countries 😂 no one is trying to kill democracy, just lies you tell yourself.

​@@Bronco46tubejust wait a minute the USA does not care about democracy in another country all they care about is their interests and that it

Ahh, it was originally released with a 105mm until August of 1985. As of 1985 the M-1A1 went into production with the german made 125 smooth bore cannon. Most of the original M-1's were upgraded.

​@@Bronco46tube M256 is a built in America Licensed Copy of L-44 RH 120mm. M-1A1 and M1A2 were tested with the L-55. Tests failed because we couldn't fully stabilize it well enough. The person told me that the rest of the TRIALS are Classified but not top secret or etc, OBTW, the 105mm M-68 is a Lic Copy of the British L-7. I was on Panzer Kaserne in Feb of 1985 when we picked up M1/105mm.

$179000,000,000,000,000.oo

Not yet the time

True

We won every battle and politics lost the war not our solders and equipment.

They have both.

@@tommygun5038 I know they do and they are complimentary rather than HIMARS replacing MLRS. I watched MLRS letting rip during Desert Storm. Truly awesome kit and that was with the older generation rockets.

@@gusgone4527 .....They both fire the same rockets. It's just ones tracked and carries twice the rockets but doesn't shoot and scoot as fast as the himars.

@@tommygun5038 I'm well aware of that too. But the selection of projectiles has grown since my time in uniform. MLRS is no slouch when it comes to scooting, trust me. Our local reserve unit has them, 101st Reg, Royal Artillery. Often see them out and about training.

@@gusgone4527 ....Any tracked vehicle is going to be more maintenance though.

what a total BS. Kinzhal was intrecepeted MULTIPLE times by Patriot, proved to be a joke instead on hypersonic missile. Lancet does not run up to 80km, educate yourself. Not even mentioning that S300-400 is TOTALLY incapable of intercepting ATACMS missiles. Hiamars does not not have to be on the frontline. And by the way, Iraq army notest the difference. Read some history.

That we are allowed to know about at the moment, we all might be surprised in our next war at what the USA put on the battlefield, and in the skies I'm sure of IT. 😮🫨😉🙃🫠😜🤪🫣😅😂😂🫡🫡❤❤

I guess the US army only being on US territory might sound like some tough talk but we love our army and they are backed by the largest militia in the world, bigger than all militaries combined, and if we have to quit our jobs to make tank parts that is what will happen.

Cry 😂

Lol

Freedom fighters ? ? Thouse with sandals that shoots you and then they run and used women and children as Shell ? ? ?

The United States still powerful tho🤪

@@catrinawilliamson5488 Of course the strongest most advanced millitary on earth. I dont even understand how people can compare Russia that still uces WW2 stuff to such a country the US is.. Hell... They compare Russia to NATO XD