😂

​@bruhh5933I am in support of indian invasion ...on Pakistan💀

Telugus migrated from California and Texas

So don't watch

@@Aparup985 feedback is not for you. So, you can relax.

I agree

@@Aparup985 are you serious? If the point is to educate Hindus then these types of things matter

This clearly looks like ad-hoc arrangement. You could rarely plan to get such guests at same time. Don't be so pedantic instead use some common sense

It also has name for snow even though it doesn't snow in India. Has word for spring and autumn even though this season doesn't exist in India. India only experiences summer, monsoon and winter. There isn't even a transition period of more than a month.

​@@praz7it does snow in indian subcontinent

More precisely they ignore how just 1000 people may change language of people their population may more than lakh this shit its pure bollocks

@@veerswami7175 Proponents of Aryan Invasion Theory simply lacks common sense.

@@MrLee-gj2jz first of all linguistics is not an exact science . Therefore nothing concrete can be derived from linguistics. While, in case of Genetics all depend upon the number of sample collected and the specific location to which they belong. I doubt enough genetic sample has ever been collected to correctly determine the ancestry of even a fraction of the population of India. Only Evidence which could prove or disprove Aryan invasion Theory is the ARCHEOLOGICAL one. Which has find nothing about so called ARYAN INVASION THEORY. Moreover, Roots of Aryan Invasion Theory lies in Systemic Racism and Nazism.

Sir Julian Sorell Huxley underwent another evolution of thought concerning race. In *We Europeans, published in 1936* _in which he explicitly says_ ""Moreover Max Muller threw another apple of discord. He introduced a proposition *which is demonstrably false* . He spoke not only of a definite Aryan language and its descendants, but also of a Corresponding "Aryan race." "" The renowned natural scientist, Sir Julian Huxley argues that: In England and America *the phrase 'Aryan race' has quite ceased to be used by writers with scientific knowledge* , though *it appears occasionally in political and propagandist literature*

So how come India was invaded and conquered many times through same mountains by differing forces and different cultures Vedic aryans were fish eating Brahmins

No, rigveda is strictly about puru bharata clan only, it's not pan India.

​@@praz7actually it is about India since it talks about about 17 rivers of India And India is Bharat.

Fun fact : pre independence almost all political leaders believed in Aryan invasion theory and considered themselves Aryan eg Gandhi, Tilak, Nehru,savarkar, golvelkar etc only Ambedkar opposed it. Now right wing opposes it and left believe in it.

🧢

🧢

@@alpeshmittal3779 Colonial thought process has deep root, right wing/left wing doesn't matter.

@@ppchowdhury9332 it's not colonial thought it's their own

Stop pushing your fantasy. There is a clear gap between classical Sanskrit and other indo Europeans languages that's why they are siblings and their mother is proto indo Europeans language

@@gagadonim3354 The simple point is what should PIE be called. The parent / ancestral language of Vedic Sanskrit originated in India, it was spoken by the direct genetic ancestors of the developers of Vedic Sanskrit who were the composers of the Vedas i.e.., the Puru-Bharatas. Therefore this parent / ancestral language should be called Proto Sanskrit and NOT PIE. Europeans only took the language from people who had migrated from India, thus Europeans are not the related Genetically to the Proto-Sanskrit speakers. So naming the Proto language 'European' is fundamentally wrong. Developers should get credit, NOT users.

@@DiatomAlgae I see your points. But we need more evidence for sure

@@gagadonim3354 Indo-European is a silly name. Only one location name must be used, based on your opinion of location of origin of Vedic Sanskrit. If it is India - Proto Sanskrit. Europe - Proto European. Steppe - Proto Yamnaya Anatolia - Proto Anatolian. There are no Bronze Age civilizations in Europe, Steppe and Anatolia. 'PIE' is used by Europeans to claim that there is ambiguity. There is no ambiguity. All the evidence is available. Vedic Sanskrit is the Oldest language in the So-Called 'Indo European' language family. The Bronze Age civilization started in India around 3300 BCE. What was the language of this civilization? It has to be Sanskrit, it can't be any other language. There is ZERO / NIL evidence of any other language ever having been used in this part of India [ Sind, Gujarat, Punjab, Shekawat, Marwar, Haryana, etc.], other than Sanskrit.

also, there are 0 evidence of AMT. one should not confuse these migrations with AMT.

the migration was gradual it took 2000 yrs it start from 1400bce to 400 ce .... and this steppes people also had R1A DNA almost every iindian had it ( excl. NE and Andaman).... remember don't consider this steppe with aaryan ... also in kashmir scientist found some samples which found to be around 2700 BCE and this dna is similar to present day kashmiri bbrahmin ( pundits) .....

@@VanaraVegeta Its the opposite,theres too many evidence of AMT that even OOT cant even answer basic questions. Questions such as why genetic shows steppe ancestry to be absent in Harappan people but present everywhere in India after 1500 BC. Questions such as why earliest finding of a proto sankrit language existed outside of India but nowhere it is find in India. Such as the prevalance of old Vedic gods in Mittani empire but nowhere to be found in Indian history

source: THE SPREAD OF ZEBU CATTLE FROM SOUTH ASIA TO THE EAST MEDITERRANEAN REGION AS A MARKER OF INDO-EUROPEAN POPULATION DISPERSAL ~ Semenenko, Aleksandr Andreyevich *INTRODUCTION* Zebu cattle endemic in South Asia were domesticated in the Indus valley around 7000 BC. Zebu bulls played an important role in the religion and mythology of Indo-Aryans native to Hindustan since the composition of Rigveda where they are mentioned in an exclusive connection with Indo-Aryan Devas in all main chronological layers of the text (I.46.3; I.121.4; I.181.5; I.184.3; IV.44.2; V.73.7; V.75.4; VIII.20.21; X.8.2; X.102.7). The spread of zebu cattle (depictions) from India through Afghanistan, southern Central Asia and modern day Iran to the East Mediterranean region including Syria, Anatolia, Cyprus and Palestine correlates well with the present geographical distribution of human Y- haplogroups L-M11, R2 (R-L266) and R1a-Z93 originating from Hindustan and of South Asian human genome K5 and South Indian human genome K16 (see the maps published by Dr. O. Balanovsky. *CONCLUSION* The spread of zebu cattle (depictions) from the Indus valley to the East Mediterranean region including Syria, Anatolia, Cyprus and Palestine correlates well with the present geographical distribution of human Yhaplogroups L-M11, R2 (R-L266) and R1a Z93 originating from Hindustan and of South Asian human genome K5 and South Indian human genome K16. Both sets of data correlate with maps showing the relative proportions of zebu admixture in the three genomic components (mitochondrial, autosomal and Y-chromosomal) from the present day cattle populations across the Near East. These human population and domestic humped cattle movements are to be connected with the dispersal of Indo-European languages (spoken - Indo-Aryan and Iranian - and extinct - Kassite and Mitanni Aryan and Anatolian) from Hindustan to Asia Minor in 7000-1000 BC.

Even tho Flat Earthers are wrong still all the Globe Earthers debate them regularly so why not in our case debates should be done too (and we aren't even on the wrong side here)? Truth fears no investigation, if they aren't debating this means they know they have holes in their theory which they don't wanna show

​@@MrLee-gj2jz could it be that the Kshatriyas slayed by parshurama were these people?

Because of existing academics of that contemporary which was colonized by the European orientalists mostly

@@praz7 thats a myth not real

😂😂😂 gazab!

Regionalist or subnationalists are already doing what you have mentioned 😂

@@manishsingh9566 Videshi is a word for people from another civilization , When culture was same Videshi cannot be termed to it ..

@Manish Singh but not when they coined aaryavrat or bharat verse or jumbhudivp.

No this is wrong. I don't think you understand the situation. 1. Mammoths where not found in Steppe or Anatolia but Siberia ~5k BC which is not the mainstream homeland of PIE 2. Cognate words of Ibha in Germanic (ulbandus) and Slavic (velibodŭ) have the meaning Camel. In RV it means Elephant. This semantic change won't happen if Elephants were not absent in Central Asia. 3. India is the only IE area were Elephants were found, tamed, traded and used for warfare, transport and menial tasks.

@@raghavarvoltore6517 YAMNAYA and other steppe people were descended from ancestral north Eurasians whi were the primary hunters of these mammoths

@@raghavarvoltore6517 in vedic Sanskrit there are atleast 5 words for elephant in rig veda, wheras only ibha is the only word present in other branches

@@descendedofrigvedicclans2216 what is Ssc and why is yamnaya not related to Ehg

@@descendedofrigvedicclans2216 what is Ssc and why is yamnaya not related to Ehg

Basically he disproved the AMT/AIT & As he noted, there are continuous small migrations in and out of India over a long period of history. Also, he explicitly mentioned that there are some solid evidence of *OIT* (out of India theory).

@@VanaraVegeta oh great. Ty. What is kushaal talking about about new evidence that shows 'Aryan' homeland came from Iran? Is Dr. Rai saying homeland is for Sure in india genetically?

@@VanaraVegeta bruh, the audio is so weak can u summarize the video in brief for me?? just say in few lines and conclusion

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ebuXoqZ_2dLIk4U.html

They were technically talking about that. But the main idea of Aryan Migration Hypothesis Is AIT itself (Mentioned in this discussion ) were the mainstream academia seamlessly spreads it was actually an invasion .

@@MrLee-gj2jz the DNA scientist guy said that the iindian's and iirainian have same dna upto 10000bce ... not todays iiran they have some aarab dna whereas parsis have same iindian dna ... now go find PIE langauge..

In nothern iran armenia region

Sir includes West Asia as part of India while doing sampling because Indian subcontinent isn't enough.

You did not get anything of what's being discussed Both invasion and migration is debunked with respect to present of IE in India. It's Indo-Iranian in origin. So there's no question of invasion OR migration As for violence, the compilation of vedas starts at the culmination of widespread violence in form of tribal wars that's described in Rig Veda. So noone's denying violence in our past Lastly, trying to legitimise their presence in India is how British started this mess pushing the fraud idea of pure superior race leading to Nazism, wars, and racism that exists to this day. And the ethnic conflicts of today's India is the direct consequence of Europeans in India cooking up stories. Such a cooked up story by Europeans killed the entire Tutsi tribe in Rwanda

All this debunking of the Aryan invasion theory is Aryan propaganda. Do not fool us. When the Europeans ruled India the Aryan people were falling at their feet like chamchas. Now when they have left, they are talking in a lofty tone. All the Indians in the USA and Europe are Indian Aryans. You should have said all these things when the Europeans were here. You never did anything. Portraying the Aryans as a innocent race is ridiculous. They are invaders. They are happily enjoying their life in India. Why don''t you go back to Central Asia? @@jignyasu

christian tamil lolololol

Please tell me where I am wrong.@@hanzoY248

Ohh Jesus was Indian??

No one denies this.

@@raghavarvoltore6517 then why do these people keep trying to disprove this and have an issue with it ??

@@himynameiscat1795 That's because they themselves have an hidden agenda that they would like to push. The fact that Indo European languages are related and that's been proven by linguists and philologist, and also there is some DNA markers that have been looked at. So we are on the right track. We can all argue about this till the cows come home, but unless we have a time machine, we can't really prove anything but go by the most accepted hypothesis.

​@@himynameiscat1795 well it looks like you didn't realise that there is not a single evidence of AMT (single large migration). On the other hand we have some solid evidence of *OIT* (out of India theory).

@@himynameiscat1795 No one is disproving we are a mixed population rather they are rejecting the notion that IA and its culture has it roots outside the subcontinent. Don't confuse the two.

Reich support AMT not AIT. Actually the whole world support AMT,youll find only little people who are in denial unable to accept the reality of AMT

Just because a gatekeeper like Reich supports something does not mean it is correct. In data sparse fields like this, available data can be fit to different narratives equally well. Reich's narrative rests on gatekeeping; whereas Rai presents cogent evidence for his views. I find Rai more credible.

​@@RJ-is5uz Who is Reich?