The Battle of Midway (1942): A Turning point during the Pacific War.

  Рет қаралды 337,631

The Pacific War Channel

The Pacific War Channel

4 жыл бұрын

This video is about the Battle of Midway one of the most important naval battles of the Pacific War, includes an animated battle map.
➡️The battle of Midway is one of the major turning points of the Pacific War during WW2. It was also one of the greatest naval battles in all history. This video also includes Nagumo' Dilemma, an animated battle map of of the battle of Midway, the battle of Coral Sea and much more.
➡️Japan's carriers: Akagi, Kaga, Hiryū, Sōryū faced off against America's USS Hornet, Enterprise and Yorktown. Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto with Vice admiral Chuichi Nagumo faced off against Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz Rear Admiral Frank J. Fletcher and Rear Admiral Raymond A. Spruance. The perceived invincible Mitsubishi A6M "Zero" fighter faced off against America's less advanced fighters. The fate of the Pacific War held in the balance as the two great naval powers collided.
➡️This video incorporates a step-by-step account of the event's using an animated map, actual battle footage and cinematic footage. It deals with the set up to the battle of Midway (The attack on Pearl Harbor & The Battle of Coral Sea), every major ship, all commanders, complete battle orders, significant factors that led to the outcome and its significance in global history.
**There is a slip of the tongue in this video when speaking about the Doolittle Raid, meant to say B-25's and not B-52's!**
The video was made in respect to those that served and died during this event.
As one of the contributing factors of the Pacific War, we’ll be exploring how the battle of Midway effected the Pacific War.
🎼 If you are interested in more in-depth information, check out our Podcast:
PacificWarChannel.podbean.com
To see the episode explaining the background to how we got into this event click here:
✅ "The Battle of Midway (1942): A Turning point during the Pacific War."
• Pacific War Podcast 🎙️...
Subscribe for more Videos of the Pacific War Channel using this Link ⤵️
kzfaq.info...
********************
🎬 Welcome to the Pacific War Channel 🌏
Welcome to the Pacific War Channel, the channel where we cover the entire history of the Asia-Pacific war of 1937-1945.
My name is Craig, and I am a University Graduate of both History and Neuroscience, currently working for an education center in Canada.
▶️ This channel includes all the major events that led up to the Pacific War and reflect on the historical moments that contributed towards one of the biggest events in east-Asian history.
From this channel, you can expect to enjoy episodes dedicated to major events, book and film reviews related to the Pacific War, and a look at the Pacific War Podcast where we discuss the KZfaq episodes and more! 🗺
▶️ Don’t forget to subscribe to the Channel, hit the bell button, and never miss a video! 🛎
********************
🌟 Connect with the Pacific War Channel on Social Media:
Facebook ➡️ / thepacificwarchannel
Instagram ➡️ / thepacificwarchannel
Twitter ➡️ / the_pacificwar
Don’t forget to follow us on Twitch:
▶️ / thepacificwarchannel
********************
#ww2 #Midway #ThePacificWarChannel

Пікірлер: 308
@ThePacificWarChannel
@ThePacificWarChannel 3 жыл бұрын
Hello everyone, boy this video took off after a year of being out? Learnt a lot from your messages and yes a lot of corrections to be made! Wanted to express my thanks and address the new channel direction. Please stay tuned for Pacific War content, next stop is the Opium Wars!
@wadep9916
@wadep9916 3 жыл бұрын
Hi I wish the 1976 battle of midway movie was available free on TV. During the pandemic everything now on TV is all reruns.. I never seen this movie, but then watching a biographys about the Battle of Midway on KZfaq..How the Dauntlas plane won the war on Japanese carriers..
@baxfrias1153
@baxfrias1153 3 жыл бұрын
Ç
@elymayer4860
@elymayer4860 3 жыл бұрын
Morsby. Not Mores Berry
@elymayer4860
@elymayer4860 3 жыл бұрын
Halsey. Not Hasely. I’ve had enough.
@douglasturner6153
@douglasturner6153 3 жыл бұрын
Ppl
@joeturnip4216
@joeturnip4216 3 жыл бұрын
The Citizens of Tokyo must have been highly surprised when all those "B-52 JET BOMBERS" flew over in 1942. After all, they were really expecting B-25 BOMBERS.......
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
They weren't expecting any bombers. That's one reason the Doolittle Raid was effective and provoked the IJN into extending its lines.
@joeturnip4216
@joeturnip4216 3 жыл бұрын
@@chucksteward2615 I easily got this right because General Doolittle's beautiful granddaughter Jodie lived in the house behind mine in the 1960's which makes still me think about the Doolittle Raid to this day.....
@VeiledVerities
@VeiledVerities 3 жыл бұрын
Launching B-52s from those carriers would have been some feat
@andrewtaylor940
@andrewtaylor940 3 жыл бұрын
Kenneth Dawson They were expecting bombers. Just naval bombers. Which had a third the range and much less payload than the B-25’s. The Japanese picket boats had reported the carriers before they were sunk. But Yamamoto thought he had another full day before they would get in range to launch. He also thought he could then catch them in range of his land based aircraft. The Japanese weren’t expecting the bombers to hit a short time after the outer picket boats spotted Halsey’s fleet. The fact that the US could suddenly put multi engine long range bombers over Tokyo, via Carrier, from outside his defensive range, horrified him. The American’s weren’t supposed to do things like that! Sending bombers on a one way trip over Tokyo that the crews had little hope of surviving? They never imagined the soft Yankee’s capable of such. (I think it bothered and terrified them even more when most of the bomber crews successfully made it back to the US within a few weeks.
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
@@andrewtaylor940 This was an excellent reply.
@ThePacificWarChannel
@ThePacificWarChannel 3 жыл бұрын
Hello everyone! Quite the surprise that this video has received so many views recently O.O! Thought I might say this here, I unbelievably did a poor narration job on this video and have taken all the commentary to heart going forward. This channel is actually changing completely in the next few months towards being a channel based solely on the Pacific War of 1937-1945 featuring a lot of background history of China/Japan during the 1800's! A lot of work has been done and it will be coming out soon! Thank you for watching and your comments! =3
@doug8525
@doug8525 3 жыл бұрын
NBS History he also said Port Morsberry and a circuous route and I’m only a minute or so in.....
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
You did fine. History has never been certain about Midway. In my opinion, the IJN expected one or two "Enterprise Class" carriers. One may have been dispatched to Alaska. For those of you who want to correct me for describing the Yorktown Class ships as "Enterprise Class," I'm using the IJN description. They reported "Enterprise Class" carriers; Ironically the Yorktown each time. The Enterprise and Hornet were both Yorktown Class. Another reason I believe the IJN believed the USN had only two carriers at Midway was reported her pilots were sitting, drinking tea, and eating rice balls when the fatal attack on the Hiryu occurred. It didn't seem they were believed they were engaged in battle with a third carrier. It's just an opinion.
@captmikedunatov
@captmikedunatov 3 жыл бұрын
I am going to say it straight with no chaser...there are content providers here on KZfaq who produce far more informative presentations without the glaring and too numerous errors. Take this to heart before you present more of these if you intend to continue or you will be on the receiving end of more heavy calibre naval rifles than you ever believe existed here.
@johnnyg3166
@johnnyg3166 3 жыл бұрын
Just to help you out. The yorktown was repaired in 36 hours, not 2 weeks.
@Kevin.morales682
@Kevin.morales682 3 жыл бұрын
Come on he is trying his best
@johnnyg3166
@johnnyg3166 3 жыл бұрын
@@Kevin.morales682 i understand that. After all the comments ripping on him, maybe he could use a friendly tip
@bobbailey2587
@bobbailey2587 3 жыл бұрын
@@Kevin.morales682 his best sucks. He needs to try and reed up on simple facts that should be common knowledge. If your not going to take the time to find out the basic facts. If you do not know what you're talkin about don't bother posting anything
@shelliecarlson7015
@shelliecarlson7015 3 жыл бұрын
That, and B52s won't fit on any carriers, let alone, Enterprise. Oh, and it wasn't thought up yet.
@tomupchurch4911
@tomupchurch4911 3 жыл бұрын
16 B-52's launching from The Hornet!! Marvelous.
@Kevin.morales682
@Kevin.morales682 3 жыл бұрын
Keep goin with your channel man
@ThePacificWarChannel
@ThePacificWarChannel 4 жыл бұрын
What did you think of the Battle of Midway? Was it the turning point of the Pacific War? Let me know in the comments below!
@dartmaster501
@dartmaster501 4 жыл бұрын
First, they were no B-52s in 1942. The planes that participated in the Doolittle Raid were B-25 Mitchell bombers. It was Spruance, like nuance, not sure what you actually said. And, it was Port Moresby (there is no Morseberry). And yes, it was THE turning point for the war in the Pacific. The IJN could not kept up with our technological advances, industrial production and replacement of trained and effective pilots and crews.
@ThePacificWarChannel
@ThePacificWarChannel 4 жыл бұрын
@@dartmaster501 Yes it was a dyslexic slip of the tongue with the B-25's I am cringing over it.
@f430ferrari5
@f430ferrari5 4 жыл бұрын
Yes. Midway was the turning point. It was the most critical battle in the Pacific. The IJN really had all the advantages to win it but many blunders led to a catastrophic loss. This loss bought the US valuable time. Had the IJN won at Midway it’s very difficult for the US to get out of 1942. The Us mass production didn’t really start to ramp up and show results until 1944.
@robinsattahip6269
@robinsattahip6269 3 жыл бұрын
Once America was a great country, in my last 44 years as an adult I've watched it deteriorate into the joke it is now.
@davidvogel1756
@davidvogel1756 3 жыл бұрын
@@ThePacificWarChannel So was I (cringing over "B-52s," that is). Every time I heard it, another blood vessel burst in my left eyeball. And every time I heard "IJN" pronounced "IGN," another burst in my right. The comedic value of "Waldron's squall-dron'" almost made up for it, though.
@Looshmal
@Looshmal 3 жыл бұрын
Good channel. You're doing good and getting better. Got yourself a sub.
@adrianopucdihon2265
@adrianopucdihon2265 3 жыл бұрын
Learning history is great.thank you for sharing this document
@VeiledVerities
@VeiledVerities 3 жыл бұрын
Love your graphics
@ThePacificWarChannel
@ThePacificWarChannel 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you, I have no background in animating or editing so this was all very new to me haha.
@jonmajarucon51
@jonmajarucon51 3 жыл бұрын
Except for a couple of mispronunciations and punctuation errors, I think this was a great summary. Obviously a lot of work went into this. You will only get better. Thank you for your research and creation
@ThePacificWarChannel
@ThePacificWarChannel 3 жыл бұрын
Probably the nicest comment I've received for this episode thank you.
@user-qz7nu3mm9r
@user-qz7nu3mm9r 3 жыл бұрын
nice video!
@jasonyoung7635
@jasonyoung7635 3 жыл бұрын
enjoyed the video. One very very important thing to point out is the Yorktown was deemed for 3 to 6 months of repair and reshape by the Navy expert from the damage from the Coral sea battle. However, Nimitz knew the japanese operation is about to begin to hit Midway in pending, given 3 days for yorktown repair. so they had to carry out the work that's absolutely crucial to Yorktown instead of total repair thanks to Shipyard workers dedication. It should never be forgotten. Shipyard isn't a lego world to disassemble and assemble it back, which is one of the hardest workplace in industry.
@andrewtaylor940
@andrewtaylor940 3 жыл бұрын
Oh another polite correction. Yamamoto and Nagumo both expected the American Carriers to be commanded by “Bull” Halsey. He was sidelined shortly before the carriers sailed with a really nasty and threatening skin condition. Spruance, Halsey’s Destroyer Group Admiral was given those two Carriers in Halsey’s stead. With Jack Fletcher on Yorktown in overall command. The Japanese had no idea who Spruance was. Much of Yamamoto’s plan counted on Halsey being Halsey. The Bull. (See how well a similar plan to Midway almost worked by baiting Halsey after carriers at Leyte Gulf later in the War). But Spruance was an almost perfect foil to the Japanese plans. It was nearly impossible to bait him. He was an incredibly cold calculating chess player who was a master at denying the Japanese the type of battles they wanted. He was that rarest of gambler, one who knew when to cash in and get out without over extending himself. (For a great look at Spruance I recommend Jame’s Hornfischer’s “The Fleet at Flood Tide”. Easily on par with his better known “Last Stand of the Tin Can Salors”) Spruance’s task focused calm under pressure and ability to see the bigger picture instead of chasing the enemy around led to the wild success of the a Great Marianas Turkey Shoot.
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
Andrew, do you have a channel I can subscribe to? You know your stuff.
@andrewtaylor940
@andrewtaylor940 3 жыл бұрын
Kenneth Dawson No channel. Just well read.
@frankousley1092
@frankousley1092 3 жыл бұрын
You need to learn to pronounce names correctly. Halsey, Spruance are household names to anyone who has knowledge of WWII Pacific action. Code breaking won the battle.
@theodoresmith5272
@theodoresmith5272 3 жыл бұрын
Yes we knew to have our ships in an ambush location. As soon as they committed to attacking midway, they were in a pickle they had to land those planes before launching any other strike. To not would mean having the planes in the air running out of fuel. Way to much is made of the rearming less then 20 planes. It was the armed strike force on the decks and in the hangers trying to launch that really caused the damage not bombs laying around from rearming
@andrewtaylor940
@andrewtaylor940 3 жыл бұрын
Theodore Smith Not exactly, although the planes and bombs lying around sure did help in the destruction. Especially the Akagi. What really killed the Japanese Carriers was the same thing that killed most Carriers lost in the war. AV Fuel Fire. Carriers had and still have an extensive network of plumbing throughout the ship that brings aviation fuel from bunkers in the bottom of the ship, to fueling points located throughout the hangers and flight decks. When the fuel filled pipes get shattered by a bomb, burning AV fuel goes everywhere and is often uncontrollable. It’s the fuel fire that then cooks off any misplaced bombs or Torpedos. The US lost the carriers Lexington to just such a fire at the Battle of Coral Sea, a few weeks before Midway. While the wounded Yorktown limped home from that battle, one of her enlisted crewmen came up with a system to purge the AV Fuel lines using CO2, when they were not actively fueling planes, and at the first sign of trouble. When Yorktown got back to Pearl the system was installed on Enterprise and Hornet as well, in the 24 hours before they sailed for Midway. The CO2 system worked incredibly. And saved the Yorktown from the first wave of dive bomber hits from Hiryu’s counter attack. The fire and damage from the bombs was dealt with in about an hour and the Carrier resumed operations. (It didn’t do much to prevent the later torpedo hits, although it did prevent fires from them.) The Akagi was particularly vulnerable to the dive bombers. She was fueling planes in the hanger and switching ordinance, when the single bomb hit the middle of the hanger, igniting everything, while at the same time landing on top of the ships specialist firefighting crew. The other problem the a Japanese Carriers had was the water mains running throughout the ships were often cast iron plumbing. Which just shattered in a bomb hit. Cutting off firefighting water supplies.
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
@@andrewtaylor940 These are the sort of comments that make a KZfaq video relevant, as opposed to criticisms that the KZfaqr should pronounce Spruance with a T or Halsey with a Z. Thank you, Andrew.
@andrewtaylor940
@andrewtaylor940 3 жыл бұрын
Ching Hung it’s KZfaq.horrible pronunciations are part of the charm. And besides it’s oddly better than the creepy robot voices autoreading a script that so many channels use.
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
@@andrewtaylor940 Andrew, the reason I read comments is for factual information which was added by someone with more knowledge. Your comments are that. Thank you. As for the Battle of Midway, accounts have varied, What did the Japanese really think was their position. This afternoon, I read from "Finding Victory," which was written by Admiral Matome Ugaki. He reported they believed both the Yorktown and Lexington had been sunk at the battle of Coral Sea. They expected to engage maybe two USN carriers, three at most (possibly the Saratoga days layer). His accounts shortly after the Battle indicated they believed the Americans had three carriers, including the Yorktown and two converted carriers. That is consistent with post-war interrogations of other IJN officers. By the end of the Battle, they were convinced the Americans had 5 carriers! With that understanding. zThat allowed them to withdraw without losing facd. One thing that puzzles me are accounts that aircrews aboard the Hiryu sat on the deck, drank saki and ate rice after attacking the Yorktown the second time. Of course, they believed they had sunk two "Enterprise" class carriers, which could/would have been the Hornet and Enterprise. The Daratoga sas days away. I question why they took such a leisurely break, if they believed another enemy carrier was searching for them. It could have already launched an airstrike. Yeah, they were tired, but that's better than being dead! Unless I'm mistaken, they had only nine dive bombers/torpedo planes, so maybe they were truly spent. I'm not sure what were their planes' condition. If they truly believed there were three carriers, much less five, why didn't they withdraw the Hiryu after their retaliatory strike against the Yorktown? Even that risked their last front line carrier (The Suikaki and Zukaka were being repaired from the Battle of Coral Sea). What is your informed opinion?
@stevegillis1510
@stevegillis1510 3 жыл бұрын
You did a great job, don't be hard on yourself. Again you did a great job.
@bobbailey2587
@bobbailey2587 3 жыл бұрын
Did a great job of not knowing Jack shit about what he was talking about
@kennedymcgovern5413
@kennedymcgovern5413 3 жыл бұрын
Oh my God. "SPRU-INTS," not "Sprontz." "HAUL- SEE." Halsey "Vin-SENS," not...whatever you said. "GRuH-Man," not "Grooman." "Aircraft," plural, is "Aircraft," not "Aircrafts." And "I.J.N." --Not "I.G.N." And I am only 11 minutes in. I don't even want to know what you are probably doing to the names of the Nip ships. Who hired you for the "narrator" job?
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
There is no "t" in Spruance, so you are also incorrect. Further, you do realize you did not write a single sentence in your reply? It's alright, few other critics did, either. I suggest you and others produce your own videos and invite the same critics to review them.
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
@mOejOe33 Since our replies tend to criticize this youtuber for his grammar and pronunciation, we too should be critiqued. You did better than most others, in that you actually wrote a sentence in your reply. However, you failed to write a sentence in the first two attempts. You failed to properly use a semicolon in the second attempted sentence. Semicolons are used to connect two independent clauses. However, I did understood your reply. So, isn't my criticism excessive? Is the criticism of others in this thread excessive as well? I liked the video with its lifelike footage. It had information not contained in other videos. Unlike others, I'm familiar enough with the War in the South Pacific to understand the mispronounced names.
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
@Joe Guitar If you've never made the effort, how can you claim another made a "poor effort?" ... or, as you write, a "POOR EFFORT?" Let me restate it in caps, as did you. IF YOU NEVER MADE THE EFFORT, HOW CAN YOU CRITICIZE ONE WHO HAS? Since we disagree, should I refer to you as a "fat head," or some other derogatory term? I was also in the third grade once. My ridiculous comments about spelling, grammar, slight inaccuracies parody others in this thread, such as yours. Should this young man "really" pronounce Spruance with a "T," as some of you demanded? Your reply was a BAD EFFORT, Joe (But you were almost grammatically correct through your first sentence! Among other criticisms, please explain how can anything be "badly" wrong?" Are there things that are "goodly" wrong?)
@aaronseet2738
@aaronseet2738 3 жыл бұрын
He couldn't get Yamamoto's given name correct either. i so ro ku = eee-so-roh-koo And I don't know either how he sees Hiryuu as "Horyu".
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
@@aaronseet2738 You know, the video was made to discuss the Battle of Midway. Although you and others seem to believe it is a contest about pronouncing names, which you likely mispronounce. For example, pronounce Hiryu to a native Japanese Speaker. Tell him that is how he should pronounce it. Do the same with Admiral Yamamoto's names. Henceforward, everyone in Japan will pronounce as you taught them. Also, please teach Australians how to correctly pronounce their country's name. Then, please have your friends teach at military colleges that Spruance, which is spelled without a "t," is however pronounced with a "t," and that Halsey, which is spelled without a "z," is pronounced with a "z." Its comical how critics of NBS History have gone berserk for challenging their own monopolies of mispronunciations.
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
"We won a great tactical victory at Pearl Harbor and thus lost the war." That was true. Note he did not claim a strategic victory. For example, the Battle of Coral Sea is often deemed a tactical victory for the IJN while a strategic victory for the USN. The IJN sank a fleet carrier, badly damaged another, 1 or 2 destroyers and an oiler. The US sank a light carrier and a few surface ships. The IJN sank more tonnage, but it had to withdraw. The invasion of Port Moresby was averted. Further, Yamamoto was denied two top-line fleet carriers for his planned Battle of Midway. Of the five carriers at Coral Sea, only one fought at Midway - the Yorktown. I believe her planes sank the Soryu. Similarly, Pearl Harbor was a tactical victory against a party against whom it had not declared war, but strategically it invited disaster. It had no chance against American industrial capacity. Had the IJN sunk all three American carriers at Midway without loss, Japan was destined to lose. If you doubt that, check records on how many fleet carriers and light carriers were produced before the end of 1943 and afterwards. The first Essex class carrier was launched shortly after Midway. Battleships, cruisers and destroyers were launched in massive numbers the IJN could not match. The US produced improved, lethal torpedoes. Check statistics on how many Japanese ships were sunk by subs. They sank two IJN carriers at the Battle of the Philippine Sea. After Midway, America produced advanced aircraft in huge numbers which were faster, more powerful than their Japanese counterparts. In fact, Nimitz considered before Midway not engaging the IJN there. He knew the USN was rapidly growing in power and number, and it would soon overwhelm the IJN . As example, look at the Battle of Philippines Sea. The US had fifteen aircraft carriers in that engagement.
@JamesB21a
@JamesB21a 3 жыл бұрын
I think you mean the invasion of Port Morris-Berry was averted. Aside from pronunciations, a good use of graphics and pictures.
@winoodlesnoodles1984
@winoodlesnoodles1984 3 жыл бұрын
While I agree Japan sealed it's fate with the attack on Pearl Harbor. It was a solid tactical decision, since Japan had assumed there was no way to avoid an inevitable conflict with the US. Had Japan managed to sink the carriers during the attack on Pearl Harbor, they could have bought themselves lots of time in the Pacific. This time could have been used to spread propaganda in the new acquired territories in an effort to get the people on their side and possibly get more recruits for their military. So, while I agree that sinking the carriers would not have changed the result of the outcome, it would have greatly changed the path to the outcome. The result we got was likely much better for people of Japanese ancestry in the US.
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
@@winoodlesnoodles1984 Good read. However, many people believe the USN had four carriers in the Pacific. Some say three, because three carriers were assigned to the Pacific Fleet. The Saratoga was in San Diego to embark her air group and cargo. She was nowhere near Pearl. Tge Enterprise was ferring planes to Mudway Island. She had been scheduled to return to Pearl on 12/7/41. However. tgat doezn't suggest sge would by in the Harbir wgen the IJN attacked Pearl. Had sge been wjtjin striming dustance of the Kito Butai, the Enterprise may have sunk several Japanese carriers. She was commanded by Bull Halsey. There was little chance and no reason to have those carriers sitting in Pearl as sitting targets. For arguments sake, assume the Enterprise was docked in Pearl. Would she simply be idle? Woukd Bull Halsey be content to polish the railings while he had 90 combat aircraft aboard? Would he have kept an air patrol in the air, which could have given early warning to the sneak attack?
@winoodlesnoodles1984
@winoodlesnoodles1984 3 жыл бұрын
​@@Zerox_Prime, you do bring up an excellent point about idle aircraft. The carriers were on maneuvers, there should have been some reconnaissance out. Were scout planes in the air at the time of the attack? If so, were they just on a limited range scouting runs to get the pilots some flying time? If these planes weren't out while the carriers were embarked, it is less likely they would have been if the carrier had been docked. When ships are docked, this time is used to give the crew a break, let them go ashore and unwind. As such, I doubt more than a single plane would have been out if the carriers were docked. Also, top brass may not have been onboard to take charge when the attack hit. Let's also be fair to Japan. They did their homework and the timing of the attack was well planned. The attack planned to begin just before 0800 (8am) on a Sunday morning when crew would be relaxed and allowed to sleep in. As such, IF a carrier were docked in Pearl at the time of the attack, it is more likely that any reconnaissance mission would be just getting under way at the crack of dawn between 0700 and 0800 (7am and 8am). As such, if a plane had gotten into the air before the attack, the odds are more likely it would have been shot down before getting off a warning or the warning would not have been adequate to prepare any extra defenses. This is why I feel that if any carriers had been docked at Pearl during the attack, they would have done little to change the outcome of the attack.
@chockwalden123
@chockwalden123 3 жыл бұрын
Love what you are doing.. Keep up the great work.. Please learn more about pronunciation of the Japanese people and ships... so... as someone said earlier... Yorktown repair time is critical. There are great references to this story... brush up on the history/story... a good and easy start would be watching the 1976 Movie "Midway".. I fully support you and have subscribed... Godspeed
@fredrickmarsiello4395
@fredrickmarsiello4395 3 жыл бұрын
Ok NBS History, you're forgiven. My father fought in the Pacific during WW2, and took me through most of it, so those names developed a sort of sanctity and one can forget that some of those names can be as difficult to pronounce as those in the "Old Testament". It will just take a little practice. You did ok.
@davidroby7290
@davidroby7290 3 жыл бұрын
my dad was army in the Pacific theater he hated mcarthur but loved halsey said he wanted his men to survive
@ThePacificWarChannel
@ThePacificWarChannel 3 жыл бұрын
I promise to pronounce things better in the future haha.
@shannonmichael9570
@shannonmichael9570 3 жыл бұрын
NBS History I liked the Video and thanks. Just keep getting better. FYI Vincennes is pronounced Vin-sins.
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
Those who can't do become critics. Don't be discouraged by ridiculous, negative comments. Do NOT pronounce Spruance with a "T" as suggested.
@richardbachman1260
@richardbachman1260 3 жыл бұрын
I think you did a good job despite the technical shortcomings. The information is a bit disorganized and less detailed (We military nerds love details) but overall it's a fun video and it does offer bits and pieces of new information that is not commonly known as the outcome of the Japanese captain that murdered the US POWs recovered from the ocean.
@davidvogel1756
@davidvogel1756 3 жыл бұрын
Add to "technical shortcomings" the random insertions of advertisements in the middle of sentences, words and syllables. Pet peeve of mine.
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Mr. Bachman for a helpful reply.
@don2458
@don2458 3 жыл бұрын
The presentation is too confusing for the novice to the Midway Battle. The proper sequence of events were either omitted or presented wrongly. The Yorktown was repaired in 72 hours. In fact, Nimitz ordered the carrier to leave Hawaii while workers were still putting the finishing touch on the Yorktown. The workers were taken off the carrier while at sea and transported on to a ship that had been sailing along side of the carrier. This is proper presentations. The visual, too, were too confusing with aircrafts flying to the right, and to the left, and back-and-forth. Now, I did like the effort, but requires much more work. Great effort, though. Polishing it up and bring it back, again. Thank you.
@maxdugan7449
@maxdugan7449 3 жыл бұрын
Doolittle and his raiders were flying B-25s not B-52s. The B-52 did not come into service until 1956
@rickwood9938
@rickwood9938 3 жыл бұрын
It would be a good idea to learn the difference between what is northeast from northwest.
@adamthrussell7466
@adamthrussell7466 2 жыл бұрын
Adam Thrussell @ Very important battle of Midway. If fortunes changed Alaska and West Coast of United States of America would of been invaded. Well done United States of America Navy and Air force. Thank you very much for your effort. Stay healthy and fit Big M 1981 Marathon Frankston to Melbourne Town Hall
@stevenlong490
@stevenlong490 3 жыл бұрын
man, l wish they had vid of B52's launching from the Yorktown in 1942.😅😅
@Smoshy16
@Smoshy16 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for making this. My constructive criticism would be to make the voice over sentences less disjointed/cut up so as to not break the flow of natural speech. The one thing that really got me though was the use of the word "aircrafts" instead of "aircraft". Multiple aircraft don't need the s on the end. Other than that; I really enjoyed your explanation and look forward to more of your videos.
@JewYai
@JewYai 4 жыл бұрын
that's the least of the mispronunciations and terrible grammar.
@Halfhyde
@Halfhyde 4 жыл бұрын
'Sproo ence and 'Hall zee
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
@@JewYai You did not write your sentence correctly. sentences are generally begun with the first word being capitalized. Thus, your reply should have been, "That's the least of the mispronunciations and terrible grammar." If you preferred a shorter word, you could have used "cacoepy" for "mispronunciation." It has three syllables instead of six. Am I being overly critical?
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
@@Halfhyde That's not bad. Other commenters are telling our youtuber to pronounce Spruance with a "t." I like they way you did it.
@andrewtaylor940
@andrewtaylor940 3 жыл бұрын
A few more bits to tighten things up. While it always gets bandied about what “single acts” the battle hinged on. It really turned on a number of small events that the US was able to better exploit. But while the Japanese Advantages are often talked up. Few ever note the American advantages going into the battle. The American’s had much better ship and shore based anti-aircraft Fire. It was literally a massive technological leap over the Japanese at this point. Japanese AA was still mostly visually aimed by the Gun crews. The American’s had powered controlled guns linked to their very advanced fire control directors. Midway Island itself was expecting the attack and was able to put up a withering curtain of steel and fire. 23% of the Japanese planes in the first wave were either shot down or rendered too badly damaged and thrown overboard when they limped back to the Carriers. Most of this was from the withering ground fire. And most of the Japanese planes lost were the Torpedo planes from Hiryu and Soryu. This is why the strike leader called for a second strike. And why Nagumo first ordered the re-arming. The first strike had done nothing to neutralize Midways airfields. Let’s contrast this with the Japanese AA fire. Over the three days of the actual battle, only 3 American planes were lost to Japanese AA fire. A PBY rigged with a torpedo and sent against the invasion force the day before the battle. A Dauntless shot down by the crippled cruiser Mogami the day after. And one Dauntless that the Kaga happened to catch with a lucky shot on his climb out. The AA was so bad that Kaga and Akagi could not shoot directly upwards. Their flight decks hung over the larger AA artillery. So once the American dive bombers were above the carriers they were home free. Another thing that doesn’t get much attention is where American planes had advantages and Japanese disadvantages. The legend of the zero is a bit overdone. The Japanese had the far better torpedo plane and Torpedos. They were the IJN’s single best weapon. But due to Midways insanely good AA fire, Hiryu only had 9 badly shot up and barely flyable torpedo planes left to counter strike with. The American Torpedo planes. The mis named “Devastators” were by comparison the worst, most useless weapon in the American arsenal. Slow, fragile, and with Torpedos that did not work. Their losses were staggering. Whereas the Americans had the superior Dive Bomber. Better speed. Better payload. Devastatingly effective twin 50’s guarding the tail. And once it drops it’s bombs a strikingly agile fighter. (The first Zero kills of the war were by Dauntless’s). The Dauntless’s quickly proved to be the American’s best weapons. The Japanese Dive Bombers we’re nearing the obsolescence. They were effective in their role. But were badly chewed up by AA fire and Wildcats. Of 18 sent against Yorktown only 3 made it away from the American’s (to be lost later). And then there was the Zero vs the Wildcat. The Zero has this legendary rep. And yes it was the best dog fighter of the time. But it had a problem. It only had 7 seconds of cannon ammo. And the Zero pilots, who were mostly meeting the Wildcats for the first time at Midway, were discovering that the Grumman’s were like flying tanks. It would take all of a zero’s 7 seconds of cannon Ammo to take down one Wildcat or Dauntless. Their machine guns were all but useless against them. The Grumman’s each had 4 or 6 Cannons to the Zero’s 2. With each cannon having 30 seconds of ammo. And the pilot could selectively fire to preserve ammo. So only shooting 2 cannon at a time. And it only took a 2 second cannon burst to flame a zero. The Zero’s could out dance the Wildcats. But the Cats could out shoot the Zeros. It was a much more closely matched pairing than the myths would leave you to believe. With the advantage going to the Wildcat once the pilots learned to not play the zeros game. And one last correction. You misread something about the Yorktown. The Yorktown was able to resume flight operations an hour after being bombed. Her flight deck was patched, the fires were out and she was making 20 knots speed. That’s why when Hiryu’s torpedo planes showed up they thought they had found a new undamaged carrier. Either Hornet or Enterprise. Also the Yorktown didn’t get two weeks of repairs after Coral Sea. It took her two weeks to limp home to Pearl at 16 knots. Leaking oil. She got 2 days of emergency repairs before leaving for midway. 5 of her 8 boilers were offline and her hull was cracked and duct taped. She should not have been operational. Here’s the other fun fact that always gets overlooked. Yamamoto thought he would be facing 2 Carriers, he actually faced 3. But if the battle had happened on his planned schedule, and not 3 days early, he would have faced 5 American Fleet Carriers. Saratoga was repaired had already left San Diego and was 2 days out from Point Luck when the Battle started. Wasp had just transitioned the Panama Canal and was similarly making flank speed to join the fray. At no point in the Pacific War, from December 7th until the day of his death in ‘43, did Yamamoto ever correctly predict where the American Carriers would be. At least not before the bombs started falling.
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
These are the gems that many of us seek uncomment sections.
@Purplexity-ww8nb
@Purplexity-ww8nb 3 жыл бұрын
I read your entire post, and enjoyed it.
@andrewtaylor940
@andrewtaylor940 3 жыл бұрын
Oh a few other little tidbits. Once Midway happened and Nimitz knew Nagumo’s carriers were burning he redirected the Saratoga to Pearl, quickly loaded it up with extra planes and sent it to meet up with Hornet and Enterprise and bring their flight groups back up to full combat strength. So by day 4-5 the American Carriers had been replenished. People also talk a lot about “why didn’t Yamamoto use Shokaku’s airplanes to restock Zuikako’s depleted flight groups, following Coral Sea, so he could get the fifth Carrier. Everyone talks about how Japanese air groups were organic to the ship and not cross trained, etc. which is true. But I went digging a bit and realized the other reason, that never gets mentioned. While Zuikako pulled into port with 4 squadrons of planes on board, hers and Shokaku’s, they were almost all Zero’s. The attack planes had mostly been wiped out from both Carriers. Even with her hangers full of the combined flight groups Zuikako had no striking power.
@Daniel-de2jh
@Daniel-de2jh 4 жыл бұрын
2:15 B25s not B52s*
@jeffwaite6624
@jeffwaite6624 3 жыл бұрын
the B52 is an 8 engine Jet bomber that could never land on a carrier ever
@andrewtaylor940
@andrewtaylor940 3 жыл бұрын
Jeff Waite although insane the US Navy in later years did manage to successfully land and launch a C-130, with no Naval modifications (no tail hook, reinforced undercarriage or catapult launch gear) Hercules from the USS Nimitz. They did a number of tests and determined that they could pull this trick off with the Herc pretty close to fully loaded. The C-130 actually landed beautifully and only took about a third of the deck to stop. It could take off from the same spot it stopped at. While a neat trick, they mostly ruled it out as a standard operation. It required the carrier to put everything in the hanger. There was only about 15-20’ margin of safety between the Herc’s right wing and the carriers island. And once landed the carriers decks were effectively fouled until it took off. Without folding wings they had no place to put it. But here’s the fun fact that most don’t realize. The C-130 can and is also used for certain types of bombing. It is the delivery system for the infamous MOAB. Wouldn’t that be fun to launch off a carrier?
@stinks2hiheaven894
@stinks2hiheaven894 3 жыл бұрын
They were B-29S
@alexius23
@alexius23 3 жыл бұрын
I believe the reason the Japanese called the SBD’s “ Helldivers” was because of the very early Clark Gable movie 🎥 called Helldivers about dive bombers on the USS Saratoga....film made in the early 30’s
@jhmoonbay
@jhmoonbay 3 жыл бұрын
They launched 16 B-52's from carriers? Just how big were those carriers? LMAO!
@remorselesscuckslayerii8276
@remorselesscuckslayerii8276 3 жыл бұрын
I watched the battle from a fishing boat. It was very loud.
@kennethjohnson5687
@kennethjohnson5687 3 жыл бұрын
it wasnt two weeks it was the trip back to pearl harbor plus 3 days to make the battle of midway for the yorktown
@mattbalboa1349
@mattbalboa1349 3 жыл бұрын
By the way... the Navy/ Marine Corps designated their aircraft differently from the US Army Air Corps. Army Fighter or Pursuit aircraft were designated P as in the P40, and came in order of their development. Naval aviation was a bit different. Take the F4F Wildcat for example. The F stood for Fighter. The 4 was the fourth fighter type adopted by the Navy, and the last F stood for Grumman. In other words, the F4F was the fourth Grumman fighter in US Naval service. F4F -3 was the 3rd production version, etc. The SBD Dauntlass was a Scout Bomber - Douglas. The 3rd designator points to the manufacturer.. The Navy used this system until Robert McNamara became Secretary of Defence.
@mohamedbinelias3246
@mohamedbinelias3246 3 жыл бұрын
I love you
@johnthompson7906
@johnthompson7906 3 жыл бұрын
Yorktown was repaired in 2 days not 2 weeks
@tommysimmons3258
@tommysimmons3258 3 жыл бұрын
Think it was a two period from getting damaged to getting it back repaired and put in position for midway is what he might of been trying to say.
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
So, the crew was not repairing the Yorktown after the Battle of Coral Sea? They did a hell of a job getting that ship back to Pearl.
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
@@tommysimmons3258 For more information, read the following article. www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/youve-got-three-days-repairing-the-yorktown-after-coral-sea/
@chinareds54
@chinareds54 3 жыл бұрын
"Kaga receives 5 direct hits".... shows the clip from the movie of Dick Best's single bomb hitting the Akagi. :p
@nickdodson8772
@nickdodson8772 3 жыл бұрын
I would have enjoyed this more if the narrator would have pronounced the names of the American admirals correctly. He also mentioned B-52s were involved in the Coral Sea battle???
@HamanKarn567
@HamanKarn567 2 жыл бұрын
To me it always felt like Midway was definitely the turning point but GuadalCanal was just as important same with Australian holding Port Moresby so three sides of the same.
@ThePacificWarChannel
@ThePacificWarChannel 2 жыл бұрын
Guadalcanal was the real turning point.
@gatorred157
@gatorred157 3 жыл бұрын
dolittle used b-25b Mitchel planes
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
Exactly.
@richardchisholm2073
@richardchisholm2073 3 жыл бұрын
Sorry I checked in. I see you acknowledge the poor narration. Hope you do some study before any other videos.
@Kristopherf1
@Kristopherf1 3 жыл бұрын
The Yorktown was finally torpedoed by a Japanese submarine which is why she went down. She was being towed back to Pearl
@leodouskyron5671
@leodouskyron5671 3 жыл бұрын
They were rigging her to be towed back to Pearl. They had not gotten under way at that time. But good correction otherwise 👍
@justtruth8281
@justtruth8281 3 жыл бұрын
Love the channel but 16 B-52s launch from the Hornet wrong plnes wrong time they were Mitchell B-25s
@mechengineer4894
@mechengineer4894 3 жыл бұрын
You need to use top views for the aircraft.
@paulheinrich7645
@paulheinrich7645 3 жыл бұрын
What’s IGN? Does he mean IJN?
@patsmith8523
@patsmith8523 3 жыл бұрын
Two corrects: Not the IGN but the IJN. The Dooltiitle Raid was carried out by B-26s not B-52s
@Purplexity-ww8nb
@Purplexity-ww8nb 3 жыл бұрын
B-25's
@patsmith8523
@patsmith8523 3 жыл бұрын
@@Purplexity-ww8nb You are right. Mistyped.
@JamesB21a
@JamesB21a 3 жыл бұрын
First, nice effort on pictures and graphics. I liked the video, however the pronunciation of many of the names was very distracting. I began to wonder if this was a GPS computer reading a script.
@kempmt1
@kempmt1 3 жыл бұрын
2:16-don't you mean 'B-25s', not B-52s?
@jessfrankel5212
@jessfrankel5212 3 жыл бұрын
"Port Moresbury?" "Horyu?" I think you meant Port Moresby and Hiryu (pronounced Hee-ryu) respectively. There are other pronunciation slip-ups as well, but the facts should be presented as facts. The Yorktown was repaired in 48 hours, not a couple of weeks. It wasn't a bad presentation, but you should really get the facts right. Having said that, it was a pretty interesting video.
@user-mj5ku7yz2q
@user-mj5ku7yz2q 3 жыл бұрын
あのとき最初の米攻撃隊の後をつけ張れば 空母の位置わかったはず。
@LIbertyorDeath419
@LIbertyorDeath419 2 жыл бұрын
The planes used in the Doolittle raid were B-25s. Not B-52s.
@leonardmichaelmarkrandrup7327
@leonardmichaelmarkrandrup7327 3 жыл бұрын
the japanese delay in securing the philippines because of the stand of filipino and american forces in bataan and corregidor was a major factor in their defeat in coral sea and midway.
@f430ferrari5
@f430ferrari5 3 жыл бұрын
Can you elaborate on this point. I don’t see this type of impact. The IJN had Midway in the palm of its hand. They blew it. They brought along a much larger and superior vessel force and fail to utilize them properly.
@leodouskyron5671
@leodouskyron5671 3 жыл бұрын
So glad you are starting off in this area but some things you may want to try look at other persons pronunciation of the ships and planes. Also a lot of events timing is off and this is big: They did not launch “pease meals” or piecemeal. Actually the American carriers launched in two distinct waves but due to poor coordination many of the attacks hit the Japanese in a piecemeal fashion. Everyone is going to pick your video apart but remember this - America made lots of mistakes in WWII and stayed with it to win. That is your mission with this channel- be brave and keep going till you win.
@hawssie1
@hawssie1 3 жыл бұрын
Doolittle raid didn't use b-52s! They weren't even around until well after the war. Maybe it was a dyslexia slip, Don't ask me why, but I can relate to that. They were actually b-25s.
@huskieheart9340
@huskieheart9340 3 жыл бұрын
You need someone to proof read and edit your material.
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
That's a good recommendation. Authors, including the best ones, routinely have editors review their work before publication.
@danhaas8310
@danhaas8310 3 жыл бұрын
The 15 planes that bombed Tokyo in the Doolittle raid were B-25 Mitchell bombers not B-52's as it is spoken in the Video.
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
Yes, we know.
@elymayer4860
@elymayer4860 3 жыл бұрын
3:42. Spruance. Not Sprouse.
@andrewtaylor940
@andrewtaylor940 3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, one other thing to watch for as you further dive into the Pacific war. Fuchida is at best what is described as a full on “Bullshit Artist”. The Japanese flagged him as such decades ago. But for some reason his accounts of the battle from the Japanese side were one of the few translated to English. So most of the English language falsehoods about midway come from him. Things like “the Japanese Strike Force was on the deck, minutes from launch”. Yeah no. A big tip-off should be “the a Japanese lookout screamed “HellDivers!”” A name and word that would not enter either the Japanese or the American English vernacular for at least a year.
@gnolan4281
@gnolan4281 3 жыл бұрын
Admiral Sprance? Admiral Hasely?
@7891ph
@7891ph 3 жыл бұрын
The Doolittle raid did not use B52's: they weren't designed until the 1950's.
@jmrodas9
@jmrodas9 Жыл бұрын
Of course he ineadvertedly inverted the numbers writing B52s when he should have wrote B25s
@larryblevins3031
@larryblevins3031 3 жыл бұрын
Just wanted to point out hat Dolittles Raiders flew B25 Mitchells not the B52 as was stated.
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
I just want to point out the word "that" begins with a "t." Also "Doolittles" should be Doolittle's. Am I being overly critical? I think so.
@larryblevins3031
@larryblevins3031 3 жыл бұрын
@@Zerox_Prime Did not want to offend you and will not make any further comments .
@ronmartin3755
@ronmartin3755 3 жыл бұрын
At 2:17 in this video, the commentator states the Doolittle Raid was performed by 16 B 52's! This is a HUGE mistake! The planes Doolittle used were B 25's! The B 52 is a 4 engine Huge Jet Bomber still in service!
@jmrodas9
@jmrodas9 Жыл бұрын
Correction. the B52 has eight engines not four.
@superserial1
@superserial1 3 жыл бұрын
2:12 “b-52’s” bombed Tokyo?
@brianpencall4882
@brianpencall4882 3 жыл бұрын
Moresberry?
@user-dy8pp3br4q
@user-dy8pp3br4q 3 жыл бұрын
山本長官が東郷元帥と同じく、陣頭指揮を取ってさえいれば、真珠湾もミッドウェーにおいて貯蔵施設のうち漏らしも、換装の判断ミスも無かったものを。山本長官は結果責任をとらねばならなかった。撃墜死は覚悟の上であったろう。
@kennypool
@kennypool 3 жыл бұрын
Yamato was not at midway. , Yorktown was repaired in 2 days not 2 weeks. Anyway I'm subscribed
@fett333
@fett333 Жыл бұрын
You are correct - the Yamato was on its way to Iscandar 😉
@hansfischer8239
@hansfischer8239 3 жыл бұрын
Yorktown was repaired in 2 days, not 2 weeks
@northwoodsliving101
@northwoodsliving101 3 жыл бұрын
B 25 not B 52 which had not been made yet for decades
@darkknight1340
@darkknight1340 3 жыл бұрын
That was nothing short of murder on the part of the US Navy high command sending the slow lumbering devastators into combat without a fighter escort.
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
And with torpedoes that wouldn't sink anything.
@locomoco4389
@locomoco4389 3 жыл бұрын
Keep it up dude, love the effort. Maybe practice your delivery a bit more and check your pronunciations? Clearly you were reading from a prepared script, but it’s all good man, practice makes perfect right?
@davebnsfnscale4433
@davebnsfnscale4433 3 жыл бұрын
Aircrafts?
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
I actually googled "aircrafts" and received results. However, you are correct. The plural of "aircraft" is "aircraft."
@georgeforgerty2875
@georgeforgerty2875 3 жыл бұрын
Sorry but lots of wrong information on this. Spruance did not take command until midway because Halsey became sick with the singles. Halsey recommended Spruance to take his command.
@williamwhite9430
@williamwhite9430 3 жыл бұрын
It’s not IGN, It’s IJN. Imperial Japanese Navy
@felipeumingajr.1346
@felipeumingajr.1346 3 жыл бұрын
Kung mangyari sa laban US vs china ito tinatawag second bathel of spratly island sea ang SCS- WPS..
@kennedymcgovern5413
@kennedymcgovern5413 3 жыл бұрын
Dude... "SPRU - INTS." Read it that way, aloud, seven times...and then pronounce "Spruance." Who the hell is "Admiral Sprontz?"
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
There is no "T" in Spruance. Would you pronounce Seance" as "Say Yontz?" Am I being overly critical? If you can't pronounce Spruance, why criticize NBS History? If you read "SPRU-INTS" seven times aloud, you would have mispronounced the Admiral's name seven times.
@felixhar3696
@felixhar3696 3 жыл бұрын
Desember 7 ,1941 pearl harbor has been attack by japan more than 2000 sailor death and many battleship has destroyed and damage,few month later american army is payback to japan and good war strategy also solid between fleet and bomber squadron also torpedo squadron.And who win battle in midway also ending war pasific 1945
@1mattadams
@1mattadams 3 жыл бұрын
B52Jet bombersweren’t around in 1942. They were introduced in the mid 50’s The first operational jet was the German ME-262 jet fighter too late to make a difference
@henriqueamaral3852
@henriqueamaral3852 3 жыл бұрын
Bom se fosse traduzido em portugues
@TheStevenWhiting
@TheStevenWhiting 3 жыл бұрын
Just watched the film Midway on Amazon and one of the Japanese carriers is destroyed and the captain says he must scuttle the ship so it doesn't end up in enemy hands and he'll go down with it. If this happened and was Japanese honour, surely someone should of said "Sod honour. We need your experience on other ships. Come with us" seems like such a waste of experience and knowledge just for honour.
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
You're writing about the Hiryu. Yeah, I agree with you.
@andrewtaylor940
@andrewtaylor940 3 жыл бұрын
Uncharacteristically for Hollywood, almost all of the named character dialogue (that isn’t exposition) is actually taken directly from the well established historical record. It’s the actual battle scenes that they get horribly wrong. But for once they treated the people with amazing respect. The scene with Admiral Yamaguchi wishing to stay behind, that he and the a Captain will “sit and watch the moon” is what was reported by survivors of the Hiryu. Oddly, assembling all the men on deck to give a poetic speech, while the ship is burning and sinking around them was a thing for Japanese Admirals. It shows up again later in the war with much more tragic results with one of the other carriers later in the war. (The carrier exploded and started to dive like a sub mid speech throwing the admirals audience into the sea. Horrible sense of timing) All of the seemingly outlandish bits of dialog in that movie were largely lifted straight from witness accounts and historic record. Of course the movie doesn’t show the follow up to the admirals poetic scene. The Hiryu’s crew evacuates to the destroyers. They fire two Torpedos into her, and leave before the Americans show up. But the ship didn’t sink. haha, funny story, nobody bothered to tell the engine room crews they were abandoning ship. After the Torpedos hit the Chief Engineer thought maybe it was time to go topside, as it was getting quite hot in the engine rooms. Around 50 engineers begin the hellish climb through the burning and exploding ship. Finally to make it to the flight deck just after dawn. They get spotted by both Japanese and American Scout planes. Shortly after Hiryu finally starts to sink. The remaining 30 or so surviving engineers find a few cases of beer and one of the ships launches. So they get away just as she goes under. And drift away to be found 2 weeks later by an American ship. Engaged in a mutiny against the Chief Engineer who was keeping all the beer for himself. At dawn the Japanese send the Destroyer Tanikaze out to find the Hiryu, pick up survivors and sink her properly this time! The American’s send every single plane they have from both the carriers and Midway. The Tanikaze arrives, finds no sign of the Hiryu. But does find itself dodging 200,000 pounds of bombs from the Carrier Bombers and two squadrons of B-17’s. The ship somehow through aggressive driving and shear luck manages to dodge every bomb, and escapes with light damage from near misses. The American’s lose 1 B-17 when they accidentally drop their (needed) auxiliary fuel tank on the Tanikaze instead of their bombs.
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
@@andrewtaylor940 Interesting.
@mitchrc3
@mitchrc3 3 жыл бұрын
Why are actors from a movie presentated as if they were the real thing?
@ThaFunkster100
@ThaFunkster100 3 жыл бұрын
Oh wow they used B52s in the doolittle raid! Amazing they were really ahead of their time, and they are still in service today! Amazing!
@iancostigan5047
@iancostigan5047 2 жыл бұрын
Sprew-ence, hall-zee. Hard to take this serious, When legendary American commanders names are pronounced wrong.
@ontheland5055
@ontheland5055 3 жыл бұрын
Yamamoto had it right. Nugumo should have gone after the carriers with whatever he had. The land based aircraft were a threat, but nothing compared to the American carriers. He blinked under pressure. So what was the response of the Navy? To put him in charge of the Leyte Gulf battle, in which Japan was humiliated and lost the war, by not forming a battle line before bringing his ships into action against a force 1/10 his size. The War Council in Japan was simply out of touch to give this proven failure a second chance to fail one last spectacular time.
@f430ferrari5
@f430ferrari5 3 жыл бұрын
@Ben Stewart. I don’t think Yamamoto ever had it right...especially from the beginning for the battle of Midway. Yamamoto approved a flawed battle plan. The “carrier attack” approach was never going to work for the IJN in the long run. The IJN didn’t even learn their lesson from the Battle of Coral Sea. It costs too many valuable pilots to sink a Us carrier. The IJN should have realized this after the Battle of Coral Sea. So even at Midway and even if the IJN launched and even if the IJN sunk all 3 Us carriers this would have come at a cost of many pilots’ lives and still out the IJN carriers at risk themselves to being sunk. This trade off in carrier losses and pilots isn’t a win for the IJN. It would have been really hard for the IJN to stay on the offensive going forward. Let’s say Hiryu survived because the IJN thinks they got all 3 Us carriers and the IJN lost 3 carriers themselves. Let’s even say that the IJN captured Midway. Based on BCS results..just like how Yorktown survived plane attacks let’s say Enterprise survived and only Hornet was additionally sunk at Midway. Enterprise is eventually repaired. The Us still brings over Wasp and the Us has 3 main carriers still. The IJN brings Hiryu back and joins it with Zuikaku and Shokaku and the IJN still has 5 smaller carriers. Junyo, Ryujo, Zuiho, Hosho, and recently completed Hiyo 53 planes. The problem is what does the IJN do next. They have to force the Us into a cease fire and the only way they were going to do this was to be able to confidently attack Hawaii for a 2nd time. The IJN didn’t have enough aerial fire power left after losing 3 main carriers and good pilots. There is too much uncertainty. The IJN commanders are not going to fully believe the pilots who claimed they sunk all 3 carriers. The IJN simply doesn’t have enough planes to launch a 2nd attack on Hawaii even if they led with their battleships with both Yamato and the recently completed Musashi in Aug 1942. The Us would have too many landed based planes...perhaps 400-500 plus they have an additional 150-230 planes for the Us carriers depending on how we work out the scenarios for Wasp and Saratoga. Both got hit by IJN sub torpedos. Wasp was sunk. Saratoga damaged and in for more repairs. Still it seems very risky for the IJN. What the IJN and Yamamoto should have done for Midway was utilize their battleships and cruisers and destroyers and keep the carriers back. This could have saved all the IJN carriers and the IJN could have sunk all 3 US carriers and confirmed it.
@robertcrawford2949
@robertcrawford2949 3 жыл бұрын
Doolittle used B 25s not B52s
@michaelseales604
@michaelseales604 3 жыл бұрын
Bombers ised were B-25 mitchell 16 planes. B-52 were not built yet. Jets weren't built till Korean war.
@isee7668
@isee7668 3 жыл бұрын
Jets were built and flown in WW2.
@joeedge576
@joeedge576 3 жыл бұрын
in the first 2 minutes, while describing the Dolittle raid on Tokyo, the narrator says that '16 B-52's' dropped bombs... They were B-25's... The B-52 was a jet powered bomber not developed until 1955.... 10 years after the war ended....
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
Joe, if you're going to fact check, please get your own facts straight. The first B-52 was produced in 1951. The original production aircraft were rolled out in 1954. Boeing states that 744 B-52s were produced between 1952 and 1962.
@joeedge576
@joeedge576 3 жыл бұрын
@@Zerox_Prime: Yes... how fun it is... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_B-52_Stratofortress First YB-52 flight was April 1952, and that was followed by the XB-52 in October 1952... The roll-out ceremony was on 18 March 1954 but the US Air Force did NOT put it into full service until 1955...
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
@@joeedge576 You specifically criticized the youtuber with a reply that stated the B-52 was not "developed" until 1955. As I wrote, Boeing reports that 744 B-52s were produced between 1952 and 1962. I submit it is impossible to produce a plane that has not been "developed." Am I being overly critical? Not in this thread, where the youtuber is chastised for not pronouncing Spruance with a "T," or that B-52s were not developed until "ten years after the war ended." Someone once told me, "those who do, actually do things. Those who don't do, criticize." Why don't you produce a video about how the B-52 was not "developed" until after August 1955? I want to see it.
@joeedge576
@joeedge576 3 жыл бұрын
@@Zerox_Prime: Ohhhhhh Noooo... I used the wrong word.... Now that is a crime that should be punishable by .... wait for it..... the Big D...... Well, go ahead. I"m already over 75, so get to it.... /s
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
@@joeedge576 LOL!
@fett333
@fett333 Жыл бұрын
Why didn’t Yamato use the Wave Motion Gun? 😉 jk but seriously a fine video even if you mispronounced “Spruance” The tide in the Pacific truly turned in the space of a few minutes when the American dive bombers commenced their initial attack after the torpedo planes brace but doomed attack. The gallant but hopeless torpedo attacks by Navy aviators in slow outdated devastators cleared the sky of zeros for the dive bombers to truly rain death from above on the imperial carriers.
@hiccurps
@hiccurps 3 жыл бұрын
I hate to tell you this there were not any B -52 bombers in WW2. It was 16 B-25 medium bombers that took off from the US Carrier USS Hornet that bombed Japan.
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
Critics would feel like real arses if they discovered the producer was dyslexic.
@mohamedbinelias8045
@mohamedbinelias8045 3 жыл бұрын
Hey Daye
@rogerclark3878
@rogerclark3878 3 жыл бұрын
B52? THINK you meant B29
@waynesnyder4906
@waynesnyder4906 3 жыл бұрын
No offense intended - BUT you called Dolittle's planes B-52s. They were B-25s. I'm sure it was just a "flub".
@gkocourek6274
@gkocourek6274 3 жыл бұрын
B-25s not B-52s. One B-52 bomb load is more than 10 times that of a B-25. When you add in cruising speed, cruising altitude and greater range Tokyo would have been badly damaged.
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
Yes, we know.
@o-h7567
@o-h7567 3 жыл бұрын
Audio is poor...even a robo voice would be an improvement.
@user-zc8gc2ij7x
@user-zc8gc2ij7x 3 жыл бұрын
god judges when the cup of sin is full。wormwood。
@bradosborne1706
@bradosborne1706 3 жыл бұрын
"Sanked"?
@6handicap604
@6handicap604 3 жыл бұрын
I take exception to your statement that if the IJN battle fleet had found the U.S. carrier fleet, the U.S, carriers would have been destroyed. What makes you think this, just superior numbers or the infamous Yamato? I can not think of one instance in either theaters of the war in which a surface battle fleet without air support defeated a carrier fleet, not once. Should I list the number of battleships sunk by aircraft during the war? By the second day, the Saratoga was in route from Pearl with replacement planes for Enterprise and Hornet. The U.S. would have 3 operational carriers against a surface fleet with no aircraft and no carriers. Yet you think the IJN would have won? You seem to forget the U.S. planes sunk and damaged several cruisers without air cover, a battleship would fare no better. I will take a planes over a battleship any day. Carriers can strike a battleship from 200 miles away, a battleship must be within 20 miles to even fire its guns. Carriers would never close with a battleship, they would run and launch aircraft. Basic naval tactics, even in WWII. I won't comment of the audio and pronunciations, enough has already been said.
@PeterAngerani
@PeterAngerani 3 жыл бұрын
Not to mention that the surface group would have zero idea where the carrier group was. If they tried to send out the battleships search planes they would be shot down.
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
It would have been a night engagement, giving the IJN an advantage, and yes a fleet aircraft carrier was sunk by surface ships (HMS Glorious) not to mention jeep carriers in Leyte Gulf.
@6handicap604
@6handicap604 3 жыл бұрын
@@Zerox_Prime I did not say it never happened, but it was very very rare. How would the IJN find the U.S. carriers at night? The IJN had no radar. The Pacific is a very very large ocean. The HMS Glorious was not a fleet carrier, she carried only 48 aircraft, all bi-planes. and inexplicably was not flying any recon when she was spotted. Jeep carriers were also not fleet carriers, they were small and slow with little armor and simply used to transport aircraft. These ships were not designed nor intended to fight fleet battles. Most smaller carriers had one offensive gun, a 5 incher mounted at the stern. Yes, they were no match for a battleship or cruiser. However, look at what was much more common. IJN Battleships sunk by aircraft, IJN Haruna, IJN Hiei, IJN Hyuga, IJN Ise, IJN Musashi, IJN Yamato. The Royal Navy fared no better with HMS Prince of Wales and HMS Repulse off of Singapore Then of course is Pearl Harbor, 8 battleships sunk or damaged by aircraft when having no air cover. There are always exceptions, but one must not lose track of the rule.
@f430ferrari5
@f430ferrari5 3 жыл бұрын
Albert Sidell dude the IJN had 11 battleships and we are talking 1942. There is no way the Us could have defeated these types of vessels in 1942 because the Us torpedo planes were junk. The IJN could have easily had CAP for many of the battleships too. The Us simply didn’t have enough planes. The Midway planes were obsolete. Why are you suddenly claiming there are no aircraft or carriers also. It doesn’t make sense. The IJN still had the 4 main carriers and in reality should have also used Junyo and Ryujo. Saratoga made it to Pearl on the last day of battle. She couldn’t have gotten to Midway in time. Her planes would have been wiped out too by the 350 fighter planes the IJN potentially could have had. I recall your name. We’ve debated before and you lost. The odds were potentially like this for Midway: Battleships - IJN 11 including Yamato and the US had zero Carriers - IJN 9 vs Us 3 with an already wounded Yorktown. Cruisers - 22 vs 8 Destroyers - 64 vs 15. Come on. Give it up. Had the IJN used their vessels properly and incorporated night fighting it’s total annihilation for the Us.
@Zerox_Prime
@Zerox_Prime 3 жыл бұрын
@@6handicap604 I like your reply. It is informative and invites discussion. Thank you. You ask a good question, "how would the Japanese find the US carriers at night?" Maybe they wouldn't. They didn't then have radar (to my knowledge). However, their night fighting prowess was extraordinary. The Battle of Savo Island is an example. It is different in that the IJN knew their destination. In the proposed scenario, they would have to make their best guess. Savo island was fought shortly after Marines were landed at Guadalcanal. A cruiser group was guarding approach to Guadalcanal, but all but one cruiser was sunk or badly damaged. I believe the Chicago lived to fight another day, as did an Australian cruiser. We relied on Radar, but the IJN relied on extraordinary optics. IMHO, I believe the IJN surface fleet had a good chance at locating our surviving carriers and escort vessels and engaging them. It was a wise move to retire the carriers east, away from Midway. Had the surface fleet not withdrawn, they could attack it with whatever planes had survived the previous engagements (Hint - not torpedo planes). Your reply creates productive discussion. Excellent.
@mohamedbinelias3246
@mohamedbinelias3246 3 жыл бұрын
The me.
@thomashoban6888
@thomashoban6888 3 жыл бұрын
IGN??? Don't you mean IJN??
@elymayer4860
@elymayer4860 3 жыл бұрын
IJN. Not IGN.
History Buffs: Midway Part One
31:04
History Buffs
Рет қаралды 4,1 МЛН
The Battle of Midway 1942: Told from the Japanese Perspective (1/3)
41:46
路飞被小孩吓到了#海贼王#路飞
00:41
路飞与唐舞桐
Рет қаралды 69 МЛН
Вечный ДВИГАТЕЛЬ!⚙️ #shorts
00:27
Гараж 54
Рет қаралды 14 МЛН
Survival skills: A great idea with duct tape #survival #lifehacks #camping
00:27
How Many Balloons Does It Take To Fly?
00:18
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 106 МЛН
How did the US Navy win the Battle of Midway?
23:48
Invicta
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
USS Salem - Last of the heavy cruisers
43:12
Drachinifel
Рет қаралды 269 М.
The Battle of Midway - Animated
15:29
The Operations Room
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
World War 1 (All Parts)
1:04:50
Epic History
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
How the Bismarck Sank HMS Hood - Documentary
46:40
Banijay History
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
The US Naval Dominance At The Battle Of Midway | Battles Won And Lost | Timeline
49:33
Timeline - World History Documentaries
Рет қаралды 2,2 МЛН
⚓ Naval Legends Marathon: Yamato. The largest battleship ever built | 🔊 Now in 6 languages!
17:12
World of Warships Official Channel
Рет қаралды 17 МЛН
The Wrecks of Midway-Diving on AKAGI, Yorktown,and KAGA with Jon Parshall September 2023-Episode 307
1:56:28
Unauthorized History of the Pacific War Podcast
Рет қаралды 46 М.
IJN Taiho - Always Train Your Crew
13:39
Drachinifel
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
路飞被小孩吓到了#海贼王#路飞
00:41
路飞与唐舞桐
Рет қаралды 69 МЛН