No video

The Beastly Propeller Fighter that Demolished Modern Jets

  Рет қаралды 197,492

Only Planes

Only Planes

Күн бұрын

Grumman’s lineage of feline-named naval fighters became synonymous with American aerial prowess during the Pacific Theatre of World War 2. These rugged and heavily armed and armored aircraft could take a beating and fight the enemy head-on with devastating effects.
As the war neared its end, Grumman introduced the most potent prop-driven fighter, the F8F Bearcat, described by many as an engine with a saddle on it due to its vast powerhouse.
Despite its smaller size, the Bearcat was a force to be reckoned with, outperforming its iconic predecessors. In fact, it was nearly 2,000 pounds lighter than the formidable F6F Hellcat, yet it packed a punch in terms of performance.
The Bearcat’s more petite frame outperformed all its peers regarding overall speed, climbing time, takeoff, and, most importantly, combat maneuverability.
With its ability to take off in less than 1,000 feet, climb to 10,000 feet in under 90 seconds, and execute tight maneuvers, the Bearcat redefined aerial combat. Its unmatched agility and firepower made it a lethal presence in the sky, representing the peak of propeller-driven fighter design just as jets began to take over the skies.

Пікірлер: 300
@matthewnewnham-runner-writer
@matthewnewnham-runner-writer Ай бұрын
Terrifiic fighter... but it clearly didn't "Demolish Modern Jets", so please - no false video titles, please.
@michaelpettersson4919
@michaelpettersson4919 Ай бұрын
True, that would have to require going up against jets and win. In the transitional era such a victory could perhaps been possible in an odd engagement. During WW2 prop fighters did have to deal with german jets after all.
@josefhunne5500
@josefhunne5500 Ай бұрын
@@michaelpettersson4919 ... and they only had a chance when technical problems occured in the jet or they were in approach for landing.
@stuartwillard6558
@stuartwillard6558 Ай бұрын
@@josefhunne5500 there is at least one known downing in air combat of a jet in the Korean War by a Sea Fury, a few others are claimed by piston engined aircraft I believe too. But as rule that statement is true.
@robertsmith9810
@robertsmith9810 Ай бұрын
or the Harries mk one
@josefhunne5500
@josefhunne5500 Ай бұрын
@@stuartwillard6558 m petterson was writing about ww2. korean aircombats jet vs prop ended very few times with a prop victory. How do germans speak: a blind chicken sometimes finds a cerial grain too ...
@billywhizz6965
@billywhizz6965 Ай бұрын
What has the video got to do about demolishing modern fighter jets? Nearly a waste of time especially mine. I thought you had something interesting to say about piston fighters and modern jets
@terry_willis
@terry_willis Ай бұрын
That's why he only has 8100 subs. 👎
@kennethcurtis1856
@kennethcurtis1856 Ай бұрын
Bye.
@stevenleek1254
@stevenleek1254 Ай бұрын
Stop click Bait video titles. They cheapen your product and piss us off.
@kpal2946
@kpal2946 Ай бұрын
Yet still here you are.
@BrimHawk
@BrimHawk Ай бұрын
@@kpal2946 Well.....yeah. Plane.
@johnhickman8094
@johnhickman8094 Ай бұрын
@@kpal2946ò
@gregmacdonald7710
@gregmacdonald7710 Ай бұрын
Well, put ya own site up, or shut up!
@USCG.Brennan
@USCG.Brennan 22 күн бұрын
@@gregmacdonald7710 He's right Greg and you know it!!
@davidc831
@davidc831 Ай бұрын
I hate clickbait titles, though this video did introduce the Bearcat to me.
@maddhatter3564
@maddhatter3564 Ай бұрын
well that may be its only plus. fascinating history
@billfarley9167
@billfarley9167 Ай бұрын
Introduce? Where in hell have you been?
@ifga16
@ifga16 Ай бұрын
If you can't provide in-context footage, then don't use random video of Avengers, Skyraiders and other non F8F. It only confuses the viewer.
@barnarus2547
@barnarus2547 Ай бұрын
You beat me to the comment. Ridiculous mish mash...maybe the creator doesn't know the difference....
@Otokichi786
@Otokichi786 Ай бұрын
I don't recall ever reading/hearing that Grumman's F8F Bearcat was a "jet killer." Oh well, the influence of "Dark Skies" is wide and pervasive.
@brettbuck7362
@brettbuck7362 Ай бұрын
I despise the "dark xxxx" channels, they are garbage from start to finish. This one is a lot less offensive, I think.
@kpal2946
@kpal2946 Ай бұрын
@@brettbuck7362 Why do you think that, I'm not a huge fan of the dark channels but they are better than a lot of other things on you tube.
@michaelshore2300
@michaelshore2300 Ай бұрын
They confuse it with the Hawker Sea fury They look similar and the fury shot down Jets
@stuartwillard6558
@stuartwillard6558 Ай бұрын
@@michaelshore2300 indeed and was the aircraft that Eric Brown described as almost impossible to choose between it and a Bearcat in their qualities. I would presume by then (Korean War) Sea Furies were used in mostly land attack roles so would be far more likely to confront a Mig than a Bearcat which would really only be for Fleet defence and Nth Korean pilots rarely ventured over the sea leading to Sea Fury pilots if engaged would thus dive low and out to sea and shake them off reasonably comfortably.
@erickborling1302
@erickborling1302 Ай бұрын
The Grumman were all in the Pacific theater I believe. The japanese did not have any jets whatsoever. Everyone should already know this!
@jameswaldeck1643
@jameswaldeck1643 Ай бұрын
Somebody needs to bone up on their aircraft ID. At .55 seconds they show an A1 Skyraider taking off then a few shots of the Grumman Tbf Avengers. Next, at 7.45 to 8.00 minutes they show more shots of A1 Skyraiders. Bearcat a jet killer? Maybe they can find some evidence, they did not show any in this presentation. I give the site an F!
@williampage622
@williampage622 Ай бұрын
To many pictures of A1 Skyraiders representing F8F Bearcats.
@stuartwillard6558
@stuartwillard6558 Ай бұрын
Yes noticed that.
@jayshaw63
@jayshaw63 Ай бұрын
Apparently, since they are both painted blue, it's all the same to the author.🙂 smh
@jk-kr8jt
@jk-kr8jt Ай бұрын
Very true and disappointing, but the Skyraider is a special aircraft.
@DeereX748
@DeereX748 Ай бұрын
I saw that too. Much larger and slower, not intended as a fighter
@gendaminoru3195
@gendaminoru3195 Ай бұрын
STOCK FOOTAGE drives me nuts in documentaries.
@marvinellis1517
@marvinellis1517 Ай бұрын
No robot speakers please......😮
@paulbriggs3072
@paulbriggs3072 Ай бұрын
I am glad to be your 20th thumbs up on that!
@kpal2946
@kpal2946 Ай бұрын
@@paulbriggs3072 What is robot speakers, just wondering?
@Ugly_German_Truths
@Ugly_German_Truths Ай бұрын
@@kpal2946 What does it sound like? A Text to speech software used to produce the "read lines" instead of an actual human being that knows how to put the emphasis on the right syllables and when to read through to a word instead of pausing right before it making the enunciation all weird.
@wmffmw1854
@wmffmw1854 Ай бұрын
My Father ran Grummans Flight Test from 1941-1965. He invented a means of airborne stress testing using radio telemetry. One of the many Grumman practices that earned them the name Iron Works.
@joeblow8964
@joeblow8964 Ай бұрын
As an old Grumman Pilot(F-14A/B), I appreciate the Grumman Iron Works...
@syramento
@syramento Ай бұрын
The Bearcat never saw combat service with the US Navy, but the F4U Corsair, a WW2 warrior, saw its combat duty extended into the Korean War. That should tell you all you need to know about the Bearcat.
@mudguy1503
@mudguy1503 Ай бұрын
The reason it didn't see service in Korea is due to the fact that it was built as a point defense fighter, not a long range plane like the Corsair. If the US hadn't dropped the atomic bombs and had to invade Japan, the Bearcats would have been fleet defense fighters to counter the kamikaze menace because it was fast, had a hell of a good climb rate and was very maneuverable. It could also be flown off of the escort carriers that couldn't handle the Corsair or Hellcat safely. By the time of Korea, fleet defense was handled by Banshees. My uncle flew Banshees off of Korea as CAP. He did tell me the Bearcat was the most fun prop plane he ever flew though.
@syramento
@syramento Ай бұрын
​@@mudguy1503Good info - thanks.
@Marc-dm1fh
@Marc-dm1fh Ай бұрын
Gets a downvote for the clickbait title. Didn't bother watching the video after reading the comments.
@Ponchoman07
@Ponchoman07 Ай бұрын
Well, it was interesting to learn about the Bearcat, but yes, sadly turned out to be just a clickbait title. Not giving it a thumbs up due to that.
@1982nsu
@1982nsu Ай бұрын
@@Ponchoman07 This video deserves a "thumbs up" but the click bait title compels me to give it a "THUMBS DOWN". I watch to the end expecting that a Bearcat of another air force shot down a jet post WW2.
@paladin0654
@paladin0654 Ай бұрын
The F-8F did not see combat in WW2, so what "modern jets" were "demolished"? You oversold a great airplane. Most people that watched this already have interest, your headline is written for those that don't have a clue.
@allanwilson8161
@allanwilson8161 Ай бұрын
End of an era for piston engine aircraft Proper aircraft !
@Grossman2868
@Grossman2868 Ай бұрын
Interestingly though, the Bearcat held the 'time to climb' record until the F16 broke it, that alone is quite telling of the machine's ablities.
@HDSME
@HDSME Ай бұрын
It was a nasty bird but came to late
@jackpoage5419
@jackpoage5419 Ай бұрын
A highly modified Bearcat performed that climb.
@DelDredd
@DelDredd 22 күн бұрын
I imagine the English Electric Lightning did it before the F16.
@HDSME
@HDSME 21 күн бұрын
@DelDredd let me guess your from uk lol
@DelDredd
@DelDredd 21 күн бұрын
@@HDSME So?, I just looked up the Time to Climb, if it came from the Wikipedia page the figures do not make sense anyway, as the F8F-1 that supposedly did it had a lower power engine than the F8F-2 which could only manage 4,464 Ft/Min so no way could it get to 10,000 feet in 94 seconds with a Take off Run, probably Wikipedia errors. The Lightning Could climb over 4 times as fast in any case and came out before the F16.
@jonathanhorne6503
@jonathanhorne6503 Ай бұрын
Ensign eliminator is what my pre war naval aviator father called it. If it used full throttle when taking off torque would want to flip the plan. The -2 version had a taller tail to tame the slow speed roll near the ground on takeoff. That said he was a LCdr with two completed tours when he first flew it.
@shawntailor5485
@shawntailor5485 Ай бұрын
I had heard it called that , what could it do with a modern engine ?
@eugeneoreilly9356
@eugeneoreilly9356 Ай бұрын
It never demolished a jet.
@RJHINKL64
@RJHINKL64 Ай бұрын
The Bearcat was able to out climb all early jets until turbine technology advanced. It clearly demolished jets in this category.
@carlcushmanhybels8159
@carlcushmanhybels8159 Ай бұрын
@@RJHINKL64 They should have mentioned this,
@eugeneoreilly9356
@eugeneoreilly9356 Ай бұрын
@@RJHINKL64 it never out climbed any operational WW2 jet.
@HDSME
@HDSME Ай бұрын
No but I believe it cloud
@maddhatter3564
@maddhatter3564 Ай бұрын
@@RJHINKL64 different definition of demolish, the text said it was a "jet killer" which it wasnt.
@maurotolari9215
@maurotolari9215 Ай бұрын
The caption had me intrigued, so I watched it until the end .There is no. mention of combat with jets. I'll add this to the list of BS channels on KZfaq .
@coreyandnathanielchartier3749
@coreyandnathanielchartier3749 Ай бұрын
This is the fighter we needed in 1942- a 450mph Wildcat. Extremely fast at medium altitudes, out-climb anything and out-run most anything, and you can fit a lot of them on a carrier. The 'jet' reference should indicate that the F8F was used for comparison with early jets because of it's climb performance. 'Modern jet' wasn't even a term back then.
@Anderson88ProductReviews-ei1mj
@Anderson88ProductReviews-ei1mj 27 күн бұрын
Ukraine needs these.
@Tuleyne
@Tuleyne Ай бұрын
I need to find my high school history teacher and scold him for lying to me. Fighter squadron 19 was activated in late May 1945, but only days later the US opted to use atomic bombs to bring WWII to an end. My history teacher told me that was in early August of 1945.
@carlcushmanhybels8159
@carlcushmanhybels8159 Ай бұрын
Well said, I caught that one too.
@derek45auto23
@derek45auto23 Ай бұрын
Lots of skyraider footage
@alexandergutfeldt1144
@alexandergutfeldt1144 Ай бұрын
Video doesn't touch what the title promises: channel goes on my 'do not recommend' list.
@thanossstewart3800
@thanossstewart3800 Ай бұрын
Love this in a funny way the vid is about the Bearcat but I keep seeing the A-1 Skyraider ....LOL
@patriot692
@patriot692 29 күн бұрын
Agreed. I know I saw some Skyraiders. In some shots, in motion the Bearcats look quite alot like Skyraiders. 🙏🇺🇸
@johnshepherd9676
@johnshepherd9676 Ай бұрын
The F8F-2 was slower than it's contemporary the F4U-5 and the Corsair had a better climb rate. The Bearcat could out turn the -5 but US Navy fighter pilots learned how to deal with the more maneuverable Zero.
@thomasschreiber9559
@thomasschreiber9559 Ай бұрын
Bearcats had shorter range and were retired in 1947, but the Corsair continued on in development and production, like the Mustang, into the early 50's. Both served in Korea and the last actve Corsair squadron was taken out of service in 1962(?)
@user-ez2tq4vi8f
@user-ez2tq4vi8f 27 күн бұрын
he irony of showing footage of skyraiders repeatedly combined with the click bait title title is that the skyraider DID demolish a pair of mig 17s in air to air combat during the Vietnam war
@frankscalzo7048
@frankscalzo7048 Ай бұрын
This is the first time that I have given a thumbs down to any KZfaq video. I watched this to hear about ANY instance where a Bearcat shot down a jet, but DID NOT HEAR EVEN ONE. Everything that was in this video I already knew. There ARE propeller driven planes that have shot down jets, The F4U, P-51, P-47 to name a few, but I have still not heard of ANY jets shot down by a F8F!
@moodberry
@moodberry 25 күн бұрын
They have gotten better with robotic narration, but it still has a way to go to become indistinguishable from real human speech.
@rogerrendzak8055
@rogerrendzak8055 Ай бұрын
Misleading title. Needs regulation.
@GeoffdeLooze
@GeoffdeLooze 28 күн бұрын
At 57 sec, you are showing an A1 Skyraider taking while talking about the Bearcat. You don’t know the difference?
@bricefleckenstein9666
@bricefleckenstein9666 Ай бұрын
Bad title. It did NOT demolish "modern" jets, only some of the EARLY jets.
@USCG.Brennan
@USCG.Brennan Ай бұрын
"Demolished Modern Jets?" Talk about a CLICKBAIT and phony title!!!
@edllorca9468
@edllorca9468 Ай бұрын
The beastly propeller fighter didn't demolish jets. sure it won a few fights but demolished is an exaggeration. that''s why we have jets not and not beastly propeller fighters.
@williamkowalchik572
@williamkowalchik572 24 күн бұрын
German ME262 first ones were taking down by P51 Mustang. Cosairs to down Migs in Korea. Not devastating but there were out there holding the line.
@marcgartner1543
@marcgartner1543 Ай бұрын
Great airplane. Cheapened by misleading title, and way too many clips of Skyraiders.
@VIctorCarruyo
@VIctorCarruyo Ай бұрын
Ok feature on the plane. However, the text to speech numbers need to improve.
@MrShaneSunshine
@MrShaneSunshine Ай бұрын
I love the sea fury!😂
@joelmclamore1898
@joelmclamore1898 Ай бұрын
It has a mighty roar!
@jean-mariejm7404
@jean-mariejm7404 Ай бұрын
Me too. Seen it at Duxford ++++
@robin7623
@robin7623 Ай бұрын
If it demolished modern jets ..... how come it's not around now ? , drop the click bait it's childish
@irigoyenanita
@irigoyenanita Ай бұрын
Warning: CLICKBAIT.
@jonb3311
@jonb3311 Ай бұрын
Far too long a video caused by repeating the same quotes over and over again.
@Ivan-pl2it
@Ivan-pl2it Ай бұрын
There is 2 things wrong that title
@1982nsu
@1982nsu Ай бұрын
This video deserves a "thumbs up" but the click bait title compels me to give it a "THUMBS DOWN".
@joep5170
@joep5170 Ай бұрын
click bait title, lots of mistakes, DOWN VOTE.
@dullorb
@dullorb Ай бұрын
I would have given this a thumbs up if the title hadn't been false. I hate being lied to. On the plus side it led me to learn that KZfaq has added "misleading" to the categories which videos can be reported for, and I do like learning new things.
@centralplains7608
@centralplains7608 Ай бұрын
Why so many images of AD-1 Skyraiders [Douglas] while talking about F-8F Bearcats [Grumman]? This video is clickbait w 1/2 truths.
@mtnshooter2487
@mtnshooter2487 Ай бұрын
Hate to tell you this AD-1s are not F8Fs.
@wbaiv
@wbaiv Ай бұрын
The title is a lie and cannot be defended or expained. And some of the film is Douglas A-1 Skyraider attack / bombers. But the Bearcat was no match for, say, a MiG-15. Interestingly, the UK Sea Fury had one MiG-15 kill, but one has to consider pilot quality. The ability to engage, disengage, and avoid combat entirely were all in the MiG's favor. The MIG pilot must have been inexperienced and over-committed., or remarkably unlucky. That said, an A-1 Skyraider, ground attack-bomber, got one MiG in Vietnam, so maybe its not just the hardware...
@billdang3953
@billdang3953 Ай бұрын
I have heard that a Corsair bagged a MiG in Korea as well.
@MrAlliecaulfield
@MrAlliecaulfield 29 күн бұрын
Looks a lot like the A1 Skyraider
@jamesmcclure815
@jamesmcclure815 Ай бұрын
Why show Douglas Skyraiders in a video about Grumman Bearcats? Poor editing!!
@Ceemysix
@Ceemysix Ай бұрын
Comparing a reciprocating engined, straight wing WW2 aircraft to a jet propulsion powered fighter jet as being superior? Yeh, OK.
@garyhooper1820
@garyhooper1820 Ай бұрын
Designed specifically as a fleet defence fighter / interceptor . It was a one trick Pony . Short range, no ability to carry munitions , primarily a Kamikaze destroyer. Had the war progressed to invasion of the Japanese home islands I believe it would have been able to prove itself to be the right plane for that mission .
@RexusOutfitters
@RexusOutfitters Ай бұрын
Pinnacles of piston-prop design: F8 Bearcat and A1 Skyraider. An everlasting credit to their designers.
@DavidSmith-ss1cg
@DavidSmith-ss1cg Ай бұрын
I Love to watch ANYTHING about the SENSATIONAL F-8F Bearcat.
@barrybeckford2733
@barrybeckford2733 Ай бұрын
Poor video, click bait
@kees1705vanwely
@kees1705vanwely 19 күн бұрын
I didn't see a demolished jet. But good information about the F8F though.
@Wolfen443
@Wolfen443 Ай бұрын
Too many technical errors in the video, sorry.
@williamcooke6056
@williamcooke6056 Ай бұрын
Click Bait Title. Great plane, didn't need the lies to get people to read it. Pull this video or fix it. Thumbs down.
@nevsmate8663
@nevsmate8663 Ай бұрын
Terrific fighter.... when/against who??
@YouTube_user3333
@YouTube_user3333 Ай бұрын
While I think there’s a lot of whingers in the comments section, they are making some pretty valid points 😂
@DuhBiggestDog
@DuhBiggestDog 29 күн бұрын
No Click Bait, please, if you want me to watch any more of your videos
@sailordude2094
@sailordude2094 Ай бұрын
I missed the part about it "demolishing" jets.
@vvvci
@vvvci Ай бұрын
Bearcat had very short range, so, even if jets had not been coming on-line, it would never have replaced all the Corsairs (or Hellcats) I've always thought Grumman missed the opportunity... to stuff a PW R-2800 in a WILDCAT, stretch the tail and lengthen the wings put bigger fuel tanks and bigger landing gear on it, then put the whole thing in a wind-tunnel to optimize top speed. Grumman did put a more powerful motor in the FM-2 "Wilder" Wildcat, but that wasn't an PW R-2800!
@billdang3953
@billdang3953 Ай бұрын
Wonder if there was any thought on using the P & W Wasp major engine ?
@jamesderickson8225
@jamesderickson8225 Ай бұрын
I'm sure there is not a lot of F8F video footage, but using F6F and Douglas Sky Raider video footage is misleading!
@michaeldavid6284
@michaeldavid6284 Ай бұрын
"Two zero zero horsepower"...really? Your channel and narration blow.
@devanishant
@devanishant 26 күн бұрын
In 1968 my father's employer took me for a ride in his Bearcat. They did aerial photography. Later, he crashed the plane and died.
@steve-ey3rx
@steve-ey3rx Ай бұрын
It beat contemporary jets, NOT "modern" jets.
@ButcherBird-FW190D
@ButcherBird-FW190D 29 күн бұрын
My Man... Your title is mis-leading, and for the most part inaccurate. Just a suggestion to focus on the reality of the situation, and to NOT title your videos so that they are.... Effectively, "Clickbait". Peace.
@lrg3834
@lrg3834 Ай бұрын
Fun fact: I was really surprised to learn the other day that some of the radial engines used to power American WWII fighter planes also found their place on commercial DC--6's and Constellations.
@Ivan-pl2it
@Ivan-pl2it Ай бұрын
4400fpm climb rate with the ability to reach 10.000 in 90 seconds, im confused..
@billfarley9167
@billfarley9167 Ай бұрын
So is the author.
@mikechevreaux7607
@mikechevreaux7607 Ай бұрын
Was P-51 Mustang 🐎 That Shot Up a Early ME-262 German Jet.
@paulgreen6980
@paulgreen6980 Ай бұрын
no it was Canadian Spitfires
@PurpleDreki
@PurpleDreki Ай бұрын
Misleading title, click bait.
@HDSME
@HDSME 21 күн бұрын
He'll cat killed the most aircraft and was slightly behind the Bearcats in performance
@richardmclaugfhlin65
@richardmclaugfhlin65 Ай бұрын
Phony title. Bad dog.
@wittwittwer1043
@wittwittwer1043 23 күн бұрын
Click-bait. The title does not justify the content: No mention of the Bearcat even engaging modern jets in combat.
@scootergeorge7089
@scootergeorge7089 11 күн бұрын
A lot of great info here, but a lot of those Bearcats are Douglas A-1 Skyraiders! A much larger aircraft with a different mision.
@thomasryan5394
@thomasryan5394 Ай бұрын
Why the Skyraider footage mixed in with the Bearcat?
@jeffreyjacobs390
@jeffreyjacobs390 27 күн бұрын
The F6F Hellcat had a 19 to 1 Kill Ratio IN WAR TIME AIR COMBAT encounters ...... it was not outclassed by ANYTHING THEN* regardless of weight. Secondly THE FIRST WW2 JET ( ME 262 ) was shot down by a BLACK PILOT in a P-51 Mustang !
@truthseeker9454
@truthseeker9454 Ай бұрын
Clickbait thumbnail and title. No like for you.
@peterweller8583
@peterweller8583 Ай бұрын
Nice clip
@briansmith7791
@briansmith7791 Ай бұрын
Somewhat interesting, but why the automated narration? After "two zero zero zero horsepower", I had to stop.
@jmrodas9
@jmrodas9 18 күн бұрын
I agree, he should have said two thousand horsepower. Regards.
@RedThebigOne
@RedThebigOne 29 күн бұрын
What a load of BS. I believe the TV series "Fighters" an A1 Skyraider was able to shoot down a MIG 17 with its 20mm cannons. The only recorded incident in Vietnam. .
@davewolfy2906
@davewolfy2906 Ай бұрын
More dross on the interweb.
@drtimsmith
@drtimsmith Ай бұрын
WHy footage of Sky Raiders at one point?
@easttexan2933
@easttexan2933 Ай бұрын
2000lbs lighter with the same engine as the Hellcat and the Corsair? Yeah, I'd say it would outperform both of them handily. Never saw action for the US, even Korea. Oh well, still one of my favs at the airshows. Round sound is the best.
@351linzdoctor
@351linzdoctor Ай бұрын
Nope!
@ronaldbrouhard1247
@ronaldbrouhard1247 Ай бұрын
I wish you'd SCRAP the Bot & narrate by a person who can talk well. It was quite a while before a Jet could beat it from tarmac to 10,000 ft. 91 sec.
@richardkudrna1450
@richardkudrna1450 Ай бұрын
If I remember right, Rare Bear hit 6000 HP on fuel injected alcohol. I got to talk to one of the men who built up that powerpoint.
@brendanpells912
@brendanpells912 Ай бұрын
Not sure it would have really stacked up against the Hawker Sea Fury
@donaldtrout1798
@donaldtrout1798 Ай бұрын
The title says demolished modern jets but you run your mouth about WWII - no jets. This is just click bait
@crawford323
@crawford323 Ай бұрын
I would be happy to own a Grumman canoe.
@UguysRnuts
@UguysRnuts Ай бұрын
I have a very pretty Grumman sailing and rowing skiff with a Torqeedo electric motor.
@jackpoage5419
@jackpoage5419 Ай бұрын
It was a highly modified Bearcat that climbed to 9,800 feet in 91.9 seconds.
@AceFreehley
@AceFreehley 29 күн бұрын
I'm sitting here and thinking about Trojan T-28. That plane would give most of the jets a run for the money.
@crowold3025
@crowold3025 Ай бұрын
F8F was 700 kg lighter than F4U with an engine of the same power, and nearly one ton lighter than Sea Fury with an engine of the same power as the R3350.  There is a record of the prototype taking off at 35 meters.  Air combat performance is determined by speed, climbing ability, and appropriate wing area.
@robertdendooven7258
@robertdendooven7258 Ай бұрын
If the war had continued into the fall of 1945, I think the Bearcat would have been most useful on the Independence-class light carriers replacing the Hellcats and the escort carriers replacing the FM-2 Wildcats. Leave the F6F and F4Us on the Essex-class for strike escort.
@johnchaney1713
@johnchaney1713 Ай бұрын
Clickbait
@jerdonsbabbler3515
@jerdonsbabbler3515 Ай бұрын
Don’t clickbait. No share. No sub. Boo.
@Jack-bs6zb
@Jack-bs6zb Ай бұрын
It was the Sea Fury that downed the Mig15. It was faster than the Bearcat.
@williampaz2092
@williampaz2092 Ай бұрын
If only this fighter had been available for frontline service by mid 1944….
@iandavis1355
@iandavis1355 Ай бұрын
(07:53) Those aren't Bearcats.
@Loki52020
@Loki52020 29 күн бұрын
The postal service LLV is made by Grumman.tough little vehicle.drove it for 12 yrs
@sjsz06
@sjsz06 Ай бұрын
One thumbs down for the click bait title...
@Brad-gk9jd
@Brad-gk9jd Ай бұрын
Cool!
How Two German Pilots did the Unthinkable
20:03
TJ3 History
Рет қаралды 552 М.
Bony Just Wants To Take A Shower #animation
00:10
GREEN MAX
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
Running With Bigger And Bigger Feastables
00:17
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 148 МЛН
الذرة أنقذت حياتي🌽😱
00:27
Cool Tool SHORTS Arabic
Рет қаралды 22 МЛН
What it was REALLY Like Flying a P-38 Lightning
20:19
TJ3 History
Рет қаралды 505 М.
DeHavilland Mosquito - Why The Luftwaffe Was Scared
17:41
Military Aviation History
Рет қаралды 187 М.
The Mysterious Plane That Made 127 Kills Without Ever Being Seen
12:56
MiGs vs Corsairs
8:17
Yarnhub
Рет қаралды 1,9 МЛН
Was The Grumman F-111B A Bad Aircraft Or A Missed Opportunity?
42:25
Not A Pound For Air To Ground
Рет қаралды 57 М.
A-36 Mustang (Apache). The P-51’s Groundpounding Sister!
12:56
World of Warbirds
Рет қаралды 216 М.
Grumman F8F Bearcat US Navy Superprop!
46:50
Greg's Airplanes and Automobiles
Рет қаралды 397 М.
Cannon Armed Sabres in the Korean War
9:55
Showtime112
Рет қаралды 89 М.
The Most Successful Fighter Plane of World War II
16:48
Military TV
Рет қаралды 366 М.