Sure

Kali audio all day

get an actual job!

@@levondarratt787 You first.

Only if you give me the Yamahas🤣🤣🤝🏽

Tiny but powerful and crisp all the way🔥

What a great combo of monitors + sub you have!! Thanks for watching and subscribing 🙏🏻

how do the a7v compare to the metas?

@@zxSwifty I've owned the original LS50, the wireless LS50 and the Metas. Best way I can describe them is muffled sounding compared to the A7V.

Better than LS50s? Now I really need to hear the Adams. I find the LS50s so detailed and technical. My Focal monitors don’t even compare to them.

For the A7 V you need the sub10 recommended by adam

Yo, if your doing home listening, dont get monitors, get hi-fi speakers. Monitors have a couple of features that make them extremely well suited to audio production but poor choices for loungerooms. The big one is that monitors are near field. That means they are tuned specifically to focus the balance of bass mid and high aproximately 4 feet in front of them, that is where you would be listening if you where doing a mix down. But outside the "flame" area those frequencies start falling out of phase and start sounding muddy and just not good. Secondly they are built for accuracy, not listening pleasure. Music when released tends to be Mastered, which specifically 'tunes' the frequency range to sound best on consumer speakers where (to quote the late great frank zappa) "teenagers turn every knob up to 10". If you listen to these on completely accurate speakers you will not get the audio as intended by the mastering engineer, you'll get something off. In the music production process the "accurate" mix is whats listened to on the monitors, but once this is done its sent to the mastering engineer who remixes the EQ to sound optimal on hi-fi speakers. This is *especially* noticable on Vinyl where the mastering applies the "RIAA" curve, an EQing system designed to avoid damaging the needle of the record, which in turn is given an inverse-curve EQing by the pre-amp in the vinyl player. After all this, the end result is intended to be an EQ and compression regime designed to be listened to on conventional HI-FI speakers. Theres a reason why the NS10s which where released in the 1970s as home listening speakers but quickly became famous as sounding "Bad" are now considered the ultimate audio production speakers. Yamaha had clumsily built near-field speakers for home listening without considering that almost nobody listens to music in the near-field except audio engineers. My recomendation is to buy high end hi-fi speakers, not monitors, if you want to hear that music the way the artist and the mix engineer intended.

​@shayneoneill1506 That's why I got "midfield monitors", which have none of the tradeoffs you claimed. If what you claim is true that a "mastering engineer" manipulates the sound to something else, which is supposed to sound better on "hifi speakers", which hifi speaker is he tuning the sound to? What exactly are the mixing engineer's intentions, here? As you are well aware, "hifi" speakers have sound that is all over the map. This makes the guessing game as to which speakers to buy even that much more difficult. All the more reason to choose a neutral speaker. I say, "when in doubt, choose accuracy", because you can then EQ and room-compensate the sound to whatever you want, and many studio monitors have room compensation software built-in. If you are arguing against "choose accuracy", then please explain to me, and all of us, as to why there is no debate or discussion around "sweet sounding microphones" or "choosing the microphone that sounds the best"? Why isn't there a "vacuum tube mic" that would really, really gives you that warm-as-diarrhea tube amp sound? I'll answer your question: no one wants to color the sound coming from the musicians - microphones are all about transducing the sound as accurately as possible. The same goes for speakers - they are merely transducers. I'm glad I'm no longer "chasing my tail" on an "audiophile journey" to seek out that magic "compatibility" between electronics and speakers - it is already taken care of for me. You can go and keep promoting the whole vintage mentality and keep the economy stimulated, but powered monitors, and especially studio monitors, are the wave of the future. There's no messing around. And frankly, many of us have other hobbies and really don't have time for playing games on some "journey".

@@shayneoneill1506 Mixing a song is blending the tracks together mastering is balancing the sonic elements of the song this has nothing to do with how it will sound on the listeners speakers. BTW i have a degree in music theory and am a music producer, singer and songwriter.

@@shayneoneill1506 Adam's a little different, they sound more HiFi-ish, less beamy, less sharp. I'd also like to dispute the notion that monitors are "completely accurate", they tend to be more tuned to be revealing of common mishaps, to the detriment of many other traits.

Lmfao stole the words out my head before I could even finish processing that statement

😂 Same here bro I’m even more sad. I have KRK ROKIT 5 G4😂

😄 stop the fomo!

🤣🤣🤣

Classic lol 😆

Thanks so much for watching!! 🙏🏻

You should get the kali audio three-way 5 inch monitors they’re really good in my opinion you can hear every crisp detail

dont buy. they are overmarketed... They look great but not great for studio monitoring

Buy genelec and nothing else

I can imagine they sound great 💪🏻

Thanks for watching!!

ah i just want to know why you gave up on your studio aha axD

Have the A7 too, bevore i had the KRK Rokit 6. I love the Adam, the best Monitor. Its a dream! :-)

For the price of $1,500.00 you can get 10 times much more.

Mids? They're literally a mid scooped hellhole

A7V or A8H is more worth it

Try the Kali In-5's or In-8's, they sound amazing and they are a lot cheaper than the Adams. 😎

I agree. As a musician I worked in a lot of different studio's with different budgets. Some were the more upgraded "home studio's", where other were in million dollar studio's, with even better speakers, so you can't compare it budget wise (also technician wise, but that is another story). If you can pay it, no problem. Bust mostly it are people with a limited budget who want to make decent (home studio) recordings with limited budget. They have to find out which works best for them, although it are better sounding speakers. But if the input is crap the output will be crap too, even with better speakers, So I would spend some more on mics if i'm on a budget (if you need them), but that's my opinion. You can always upgrade to better gear.

HS8's do get the job done in the end. They also rudely introduced standing waves to many bedroom producers.

@@BeeDotEee standing waves are not dependent on the speaker, they are dependent on the room only

@@grandpixel Have you ever noticed standing waves in any shaped room from your phone's speaker?

@@BeeDotEee standing waves are dependent on the dimensions of the room and the frequency being played. This is typically bass frequencies, although in something like a 3 ft square shower, it can be in the mid frequencies. Yes if you stand in the shower and play the right frequency with your phone you will hear standing waves.

It's the best software I ever bought

I heard one mixing pro engineer actually blames acoustic correction software for something it is doing wrong... can't remember what exactly

@@i.shadrin probably phase shift on bass. that's why it's got an on and off button

Sonarworks is great but only if u are 100% in the box, analog outboard gear can struggle with Sonarworks due to wiring and signal chain!

Before you start using it it is is definitely worth having a listen to what Streaky or Rick Rubin have to say about it. I personally would not rush out to buy it.

sorry to disappoint you, but this is not even close to be comparable to a 3-way speaker... 🥴

I mean, yes, it's a 3-way system, but the crossover frequencies are vastly different. You're not gonna cross over a subwoofer at 800 Hz for example

I dont even know how your comment got some likes...clearly there are many people here that dont know anything about speakers and frequency ... a sub is a sub ...you cant just make a sub driver be your woofer and a woofer be your midrange driver...what you said is wrong. you get studio monitors to have flattest sound possible

@@Akalipt0s I mean, if you get a sub to deal with the lowest two octaves 25-50Hz, and then 50-100Hz which the woofer would normally still take care of , the midrange will be displayed more neutrally as there's not as much low frequency content to blur it. But of course, it's still not the same.

@@hannes1734 well, not really. In the range of maximum loudness of the speaker you are "right". If you are feeding it with normal loudness levels not really.

Thank you so much for your support!! 🙌🏼

having Tinnitus from years of using the Yamaha's I can confirm this is no joke.

Tbh I got the ADAMs Tv7 cause I heard the ear fatigue was crazy glad I did

I've been using them for three years and paired them with the recommended Sub10 MK2 after a few months. It's a whole different world! If you use them for producing electronic bass-driven genres you'll finally understand your mixes. Make sure though you calibrate the subs volume to the right level and try to treat your room for bass resonances. If they are too strong the sub will just help your feeling, but not your ability to judge the mix in the low end.

Ive been using the AX series (5s and 7s) since they came out. I dont rely on the Adam's for getting a final mix. They sound great though.

@@datapusher- What's your choice then? Genelec The Ones series? :-D I'm interested

Awesome! Thank you!

Probably added after the fact with the video editing software. It's pretty easy. Or if you do want to put it on the monitor, you can simply open MS paint and make a picture the size of your monitor resolution, zoom out, fill area black, add text in the middle.

You should also check out Neumann KH310 if you want to change

Thanks so much! I would go for the Lewitt! It's a fantastic all round mic for the price - amzn.to/3VusGSG

T7Vs also