The Best Ultrawide Zoom (for Most of Us) | Sony 16-25mm f/2.8G Lens

Рет қаралды 3,738

2 ай бұрын

16-25/2.8G: geni.us/ISOM
24-50/2.8G: bhpho.to/3SHn474
Cameras Mentioned:
A7CR: geni.us/WZD0E
A7RV: geni.us/jZugA
FX3: geni.us/TD7RMF
A7 Series Baseplate: geni.us/D93EXN
Cascade Presets: benjhais.ch/cascade02
Patreon: / benjhaisch
Cascade Luts: benjhais.ch/luts
Check out the new Clever Supply Straps: benjhais.ch/clever
[Use Code BENJ for 10% off @CleverSupplyCo]
Take your films to the next level with music from Musicbed.
Sign up for a free account to listen for yourself: | benjhais.ch/musicbed
My filming gear:
Main Camera | geni.us/TD7RMF
Studio Wide Lens | geni.us/ttBaVOm
Zoom Lens | geni.us/RnL5Wy
Secondary Camera | geni.us/s98Knq
Shotgun Mic | geni.us/ggIB
Studio Light | geni.us/mlzyH
Podcast Mic | geni.us/Q62rs
Audio Interface | geni.us/suQL
My Favorite Dual Camera Straps:
Dual Camera: benjhais.ch/holdfast
Subscribe to Benj Haisch Here:
► / benjhaisch
Benj Haisch on Social Media:
► benjhaisch.com
► / benjhaisch
► / benjaminhaisch
► benjhaischphotography
DISCLAIMER: This video and description contain affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. This helps to support the channel and allows me to continue to make videos like this.

Пікірлер: 25

@_parkphoto 2 ай бұрын

I appreciate this type of lens because I'm nowhere near committed enough to ultrawides or zooms to pay for a G-master level lens in that focal length range

@SunshineHB 2 ай бұрын

I love some early morning Benj content with my coffee.

@robj1366 2 ай бұрын

Great content, always a good watch... thanks.

@stevenwaldstein2249 Ай бұрын

Thank you. I’m looking to add the new 16-25/2.8 G to my A7CR travel kit which already includes the 24-50/2.8 G. It will replace my Sigma 16-28/2.8 DG DN. That lens is internal focusing but uses 72mm filters. I got that for my original A7C that I’ve traded up from. Hope to order it soon. Take care.

@GuitarRJP Ай бұрын

I have the Sony A7Siii and the Sony A74, and do both photo and video. I have the Sony 50mm f1.4 GM lens, which I love (other than for wildlife, I have only been using primes). For lightweight travel, I am contemplating this as well as the 24-50mm f2.8 G. You can pretty much get both of these new Sony G lens for about the price of either the Sony 16-35mm F2.8 GMii or the Sony 24-70mm F2.8 GM ii, as you mentioned, so a good value. I don't really want the F4 for this range, and the 67mm filter thread idea (the GMs need an 82mm filter). I like the lightweight travel idea with these new G lenses. I don't think I am going to the Cii or CR anytime soon. I used to own the A7C and didn't care for the EVF and thought it was still too small in the hand. I think it will look good and be a lightweight option for the full frame, full size cameras.

@ldmndz4652 2 ай бұрын

YAY!..been waiting for this one..Thank you Benji for the awesome insight!....never had a lens in this range and or "category"..16-28-35 base lenses..etc so for me personally I like that it stops at 25mm...this is really interesting and definitely worth a look for sure! both for stills and video with the updated Breathing Compensation, the light form factor etc..etc looks like it will be my first lens in this category..lol.

@rickbiessman6084 2 ай бұрын

Really appreciate the 90s grunge inspired music at the beginning and end! 😍

@lichtstarke 2 ай бұрын

Can’t wait to see your M11 photos from Paris.

@danielgormanphoto 2 ай бұрын

Dope hope you had a great time in Paris.

@PhotoTrekr 2 ай бұрын

Cute kids. I happened to be out yesterday with the A7CR. And really had difficulty seeing the screen and evf in bright sun. I would be interested in the image quality of the 16-25mm compared to the 16-35mm PZ, which I already have, and the 24-50mm compared to the 24mm G and 50mm G compact lenses.

@kdtheporchpodcast5785 2 ай бұрын

I’m gonna need a longer review of this 16-25mm to the 16-35mm GM2 . I have a student discount from B&H that allows me to get the GM2 for $1950 , but still waiting for the edu price for the 16-25mm , I’m thinking it will be about $1050 . Trying to see what’s the justified price for a hobbiest that does paid gigs about 1 or 2 times every couple months . I have a Sony A7IV. Been looking for a good wide angle zoom lens .

@666vink 6 күн бұрын

Are you using a step up ring? And which filter are you using, CPL?

@sneakergearz 2 ай бұрын

As you have the 16-35G PZ, were you missing that at all on your trip? The PZ is lighter, smaller, and all internal with more reach. The 2.8 is the only advantage but could you speak more to it? You really only mentioned the filter size difference. Also, would you rather have bother the 16-25/24-50 combo or just the 16-35 which will give you that 50mm reach with super35?

@benjhaisch 2 ай бұрын

I actually cut a bit where I talked about how the 25 at f/2.8 gives a similar look to a 35mm at f/4 when in S35 crop mode. But yes, 2.8 is the main selling point there. Double the light gathering and for photography, that’s super helpful. Both are obviously great options.

@shefys 2 ай бұрын

did you get new video camera or colors? video looks unusual :)

@benjhaisch 2 ай бұрын

Moved the angle slightly and adjusted color temp on the background. Too warm for me, but always adjusting :)

@bmwguy325is9 16 күн бұрын

What setup filter thing do you have on that lens?

@benjhaisch 16 күн бұрын

Just the moment VND geni.us/tuUhd

@LacrosseMan0428 2 ай бұрын

What's your opinion on this lens vs the sigma 14-24mm? Seems like thw sigma provides more versatility by sacrificing size. Kind of torn between the two not having any ultrawides?

@benjhaisch 2 ай бұрын

Does the Sigma have filter threads? I’d assume the front element would be bulbous

@LacrosseMan0428 2 ай бұрын

@benjhaisch It does not, and you are correct the front lens is bulbous. They did add a slot in the back of the lens to add nd card filters, but these are not as good as front mount lens filters.

@kdtheporchpodcast5785 2 ай бұрын

I want to see a review of a sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 vs the new 16-25mm f2.8 .

@duvalpenny100 2 ай бұрын

The Sigma is twice the weight. Literally. I have the Sigma 14-24, and I would get the Sony over it. That extra 2mm on the wide end is noticable, but not worth twice the weight. If you want really wide, I would suggest looking at the 12-24 F4. I plan on selling my sigma and getting one of the 2 Sony's mentioned above.