i was thinking about how young doc kak looks... thx for the date so i know how much younger he was!

Yes.. they have hair!!

Exactly

Peter Gabriel or Phil Collins?

Sure. Just Genesis without the god thing.

​@@Rippypoowe are GOD 😂

Oh, are they going to talk about when God personally murdered every single man, woman, child, infant, baby in its mother’s womb via drowning??? I mean, other than the eight people that he forced into wildly incestuous relationships to re-populate the planet.

@@Rippypoo you are welcome to that view. Others may feel differently.

Light never dies. It's potential is always there.

Your mom

@@donlouden8850 You were taught spelling and punctuation in school, yes?

@@donlouden8850 so we're clear, English is obviously not your strong suit....but thinking? Most people can do a passing job of that, whether they choose to do it well or not....but it's not every day that someone shits on their own floor, takes a smell and says, I'm going to scrawl this across my laptop and broadcast it to the world...

@@TheSnoeedog Why be that mean. He/she didn't target you. Why target him/her.

@@victorgadamba5518 I wasn't mean; I provided what I consider to be a fair assessment. I'd suggest you leave your baggage behind, lest you trip over it again and embarrass yourself

@@victorgadamba5518 In what way did I "target" them?

Are not...more correct.

The sound waves are still there. But if there are no "receptors" then there is no sound to hear. Think of it in another way. Radio stations broadcast sound waves, but at a frequency that our ears cannot pick up. You need a device to convert those waves into a frequency you can hear

Because of inflation, particles and anti particles were separated that would have annihilated each other if they were close together, so fast (because the universe expanded faster than the speed of light). Leaving an unbalanced framework. Leaving one more matter particle, than antimatter particles (THIS is why we have something instead of nothing)

Said no one that spent five minutes looking at the universe.

@chadb9270 What an insignificant thing to say 👏

@swynty5767 no, not believing in Magic is the rational point of view. Insignificant is the belief in a god that has never been demonstrated to exist, ever.

@chadb9270 A lot coming from someone who probably believes everything came from nothing and nothing in life really matters, or am I wrong?

@swynty5767 that is completely wrong. But it's a nice straw man you have to use because you don't understand the universe. Most rational people understand that something always existed and that it changed form. It's the religious who believe a magical sky fairy used a magical incantation to create everything from nothing. Also, life's meaning is what you give it. No one else gives your life meaning.

clearly you're nearing puberty!

Something IS everything

What was nothing???

cosmic radiation origins by entropy - an infinite vakuum holds more energy than an infinite space full of cosmic radiation

That thought just came from your brain, which is full of nothing.

Same question could be asked about God. No one is clever enough to answer this question

That "point" would be everywhere. There is no outside to the universe.

@@jeffbguarino So how can something of miniscule size be 'everywhere'. You're not thinking. There is a vector that points to what was the center of the universe. If you can find the beginnning of the universe, then by default you have also found the center of the universe. If that universe is everywhere around us, there was no expansion.

@@RuneRelic I usually think of the current universe as closed, in that case if you set off in a straight line in any direction you will eventually come back to the starting point from the opposite direction. Just like on the Earth if you taka a plane and keep going the same direction you will return to your starting point. I am giving a two dimensional example of our three D world. So as you shrink it into the past , everything shrinks to a smaller and smaller volume. So if the universe is only 1 meter in diameter at some point in the past, then that is the whole universe and there is no outside space. All the volume of the universe one meter across is all the space there is, even in this small one meter universe you will return to your starting point if you travel in a straight line. There was no center of our expansion. Like a balloon has no center on it's 2 D surface. It has a center that is outside of the 2 D surface. With 3 D space the center could only be in 4 D space and it would not be anywhere in the 3D space, just like on a 2D surface like the earth there is no center on the 2 D surface anywhere. But since 4 D space doesn't really exist , that we know of, then there is no center at all of our 3D space.

@@jeffbguarino All of which is uttelry irrelevant. The universe has expanded. We exist in an expanded part of space that is orders of magnitude larger than it was at the beginning of time & space. Therefore, if we can see stuff that is redshifted unto the beginning of time, we are also looking at a volumne of space as it was at the beginning of time. Which is pretty much a point in space, with a three dimensional direction. Do you think you see the sun where it is and its current age...or 8 minutes 'younger' in the 'position' it was 8 minutes ago ? Your argument is....there is expansion, but no time, therefore there was no contraction smaller than it is now, at a location long ago.

@@RuneRelic When we look back in time , we are looking back to a point of space. Not a point in space. There is no center and there was no center 1 second or 1 billion year , the time doesn't matter. So now if you stand up and get a telescope and pick any direction , you will be looking back in time to the big bang. Every single direction you can point to. Every single direction you will see red shifted galaxies and every direction you will see the Cosmic Microwave Background , which is from about 350 thousand years after the big bang. If there was just an explosion in space , then you would have a center and you would only see the red shifted galaxies when looking towards the center, maybe, it all depends on how the explosion happened , if it was like a shell making it like a bubble then we would see no galaxies at all towards the center or outward to the infinite. We would only see galaxies beside us , like on the surface of a bubble.

That is something that no one knows .This question has no answer yet.Society has different opinions.People who have more religious beleifs say it was God who triggered it, while scientists are busy carring out research.[If I am wrong then sorry. I am still in school(9th grade)].

This video is from 2008. Do your research to avoid the blah blah blah stuff. Most of what you see on this topic on KZfaq is AI generated garbage. Avoid that and it will either disappear or get better.

😅The universe is not infinite. It is estimated to be about 96 billion light years. The problem is although it has boundaries it is constantly expanding like a rubber band so the goal posts keep changing

At planck time, effects can happen before the cause.

follow any particle backwards in time and you will find a 'big' bang

infinite acceleration of space as opening sequence of an infinite universe where planets are fed with stellar wind (where stellar wind follows a star's magnetic fieldlines planets occur ) and stars and galaxies are fed with cosmic radiation (where gravity is shielding from cosmic radiation gravity can never exeed the speed of light )

Technobabble nonsense. Reads like the answer to a chatgpt prompt of “please pick a bunch of science-y space words and throw them into an order resembling a lunatics ramblings”

@@timbobwe1 infinite acceleration gives the human brain the ability to grasp/fathom infinite space (what can foresee movement is intelligence -as in from where brains origin )

@@replica1052 yeah your saying the same, utter nonsense as before lol

Evidence for this claim that is completely faults???

@@chadb9270 So what's before the beginning? What's after the end ? When does distance end ? The burden of prove is not on me its on you. , deep down you know I am right.

@TXDogStar deep, deep down I know you're wrong. Well, you made the claim dippy doodle. The universe never began and it's never going to end, that is your claim. Clearly you don't understand the burden of proof as it's on you to provide evidence for that claim you made in your original statement. I'm saying it's utterly false because we have direct measurable evidence that the Universe in fact did begin to exist in its current state. The abject fact that you don't understand or have the knowledge of this doesn't change the abject fact that it is true.

Someone doesn't understand what a theory ys in science.....

Not chance, probability. If the probability of something happening is non-zero, and you have infinite time, then that thing will happen an infinite number of times

Save it for your echo chamber. Tge restof us aren't interested

“That” - me, a white man. Glad that got a laugh from ya

This was made in 2008

My bad!

Phase change.

@@alangarland8571 Explain phase without a Phase Maker.

Oh, help me god.

What began the beginner??? If you’re going to claim supernatural magic, you need to provide evidence for those claims.

You don’t get to insert a god where our current understanding ends. If we hadn’t outgrown this bronze age way of thinking we’d still think lightning is a supernatural dude being angry.

Like, the moon is made of cheese? Women were made from the rib of a man? God is good at smiting? Ignorance is bliss?

@@bertharius9518 hehehe sure why not, one day you'll see and know the truth, everyone will.

Silly idea, I know....but umm...don't watch it?

@@szia7104 the truth of what???

@@willgary8792 true, was curious about what humanistic ideology has come up with and it’s still disappointing when compared to the truth.