worst part is despite him being a BH hindu himself, he is clearly discounting what generations of bengali hindus know, specially the ones who had to leave their land . people like sen are the harbinger of certain generational misery and death of entire civilizations and communities.

they can't think beyond political parties

@@avi4606 exactly

True, I am a Bengali Hindu from Tripura.

He is beside religion

RAVINDAR CHOUHAN 😝😝🤣

😆😆😆😆😆

True 😂😂

🤣🤣👌👌

Just start watching more of RSTV and less of everything else. I've been following this channel since 2015.

yeah..and unfortunately all the other news channels are on race to divide people ☹️

Hey Its RSTV.. they are best for debates and DD national best for reporting

Loksabha and rajyabha TV are only two channels one should go to watch if they want a genuine news and discussion. Other news channels can only offer news based upon sensationalization; their hosts are specifically instructed to interrupt the discussion intermittently and make provocative comments just so they generate more TRPs. Even the participants are aware of this fact. Unfortunately, the same couldn't be said for the poor janta. We eat whenever is being fed to us without questioning anyone and anything. It's like one of those wrestling matches where wrestlers are entertainer and performer first, then and only then, are there for fighting their opponents.

@@Rahul79821 so very well said.

@@Rahul79821 4

@@dipin2 Can you count higher than that?

IAS kannan gopinathan is great intellect and true person.

😂😂👍👍👍

Sai is younger than the other panelists but way much older and mature in his knowledge and its presentation. Hats off to Sai

Insholloh. Peaceful Arbic Religion. How peaceful. Peace, piece by piece🔥🩸 Spreading in the world like inferno.

😂😂

😂😂😂

🤣🤣

🤣🤣🤣

He is a journalist not reporter

Agreee!!

I'll join 😁

Me 2

just create a facebook group! Many would like to join it.

Really whenever i remember that people like Sai i feel very safe that our country will be safe

Hope for BJP actually....he tries to find some arguable logics and pronounce with utmost conviction....making us feel as if everything is fair..same with his logics for Sabarimala issue....his starting the debate..with the premise that "Two nations theory" is a arguable reality....people of India dont believe in it..those who believed in two nations idea are in Pakistan..some reluctantly stayed in India and finally killed Gandhi for not accepting the two nation theory...I want to live in Hindusthan not Hindu Pakistan...

@@cvvaibhav4706 what is hindu pakistan my friend

@@Azadpandit1008 sir..world identifies bloody pakistan by its religion..I don't want my India to be either remembered or identified by any religion..that what I meant by not being Hindu Pakistan..Thank you for responding

@@cvvaibhav4706 Hinduism isn't a religion 😑.. There's no book for it like the other faiths/religions So there's nothing wrong in acknowledging India as a 'Hindurashtra' Also.. What are the 'arguable logics' you are talking about? Be specific atleast instead of making pointless comments

😂😂😂😂😂... But j.sai deepak is indeed best...👌

When I heard this...a big smile came on my Face😂...I was like .. What's the hell now he is going to say now 😓😨

@@sanjana329 What does the right wing agree?

@@kavyajamadar9847 same here and heard it 2-3 times just to enjoy ;-P

@@amitr1008 yeah me too😂

😁😆😇😇😇😊😊

The NRC was instituted under Secular principles, which is why in conjunction with the Muslims the Hindu's, who could not prove their citizenship, in Asaam were both deemed stateless - that's fair, because its completely secular and therefore applies to all who cannot show they are a citizen of India. A secular, democratic constitution is that which, at its root, enshrines personal freedoms for everyone!*. The cleanest and most effective *test of Secularism under the principles of Freedom to Choose is Religion! Religion is the most personal and spiritual aspect any individual should be absolutely free to make. That's Secularism and that was the test of the NRC in Asaam. The NRC failed precisely because there was uproar in the North Eastern provinces due to the reality of people being linked by Tribe and Religion rather than a National Border, people living on both sides of the border (of the same ethnicity, race, religion, culture, tribe and families) did not want to have an identity card and everyone be checked all the time to see which side of a National Border they belonged, etc. and also families and people moved and wanted to stay for as long as they want without, what they thought, were draconian laws by people not of their tribe/culture. Its why millions of Hindus along with Muslims were deemed stateless in Assam and an associated uproar as a result. The CAB is essentially stating this: Muslims are not welcome in India and the ones in India are hated and should leave and worse India will Potentially Detain You if You cannot show You are who India wants You to be - anything but Muslim. The reason CAB is xenophobic, bigoted, fascist in the context of Anti-Muslim hatred, is because his argument breaks down in the context of Myanmar. A. If this was not about Islam and Muslims, the BJP/Modi would have had to include Myanmar, because the bill is an extension of the Citizens Act, so it must apply to all countries from which people could possibly come and become citizens and reside in India. Myanmar must be included in that, because it shares a physical border with India and the first external country a nation should enact Citizenship against or in the context of, is a bordering Country! That just Citizenship 101. B. If this was not about Islam and Muslims, then the list would have included All Religious minorities that are persecuted period, the secular principles enshrined in the Indian Constitution would be obeyed and India would pass the test of being Secular and Democratic. But the BJP/Modi, named the religions that are persecuted and if they had mentioned, specifically, Myanmar then the persecuted minorities would necessarily have included Rohingya Muslims (who are a, clearly, persecuted minority in Myanmar). There are 40,000 Rohingya in India at the moment, where the BJP government are being taken to the supreme court, because the BJP want to return them, in clear violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which India is a signatory to and therefore is obliged to protect those fleeing death and persecution, which every UN report has shown, is the case for the Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar. C. The arbitrary choice of including Afghanistan over Myanmar is deeply disturbing. The claim is that Afghanistan is a security risk, due to Terrorism from there, via Pakistan. This is flawed logic for two primary reasons: 1. India shares porous borders with Pakistan, Bangladesh, Myanmar that are not or cannot be secured. So including Afghanistan seems to be the case because its a Muslim country and has a minority set that includes Hindu's, specifically, otherwise why choose it over, say Burkina Faso, Syria, Iraq (where Christians and other minority faiths) are persecuted? 2. If threats can arrive to India via Afghanistan, then why not Myanmar? India should be secured against Myanmar too - its virtually unmanned and unregulated. Terrorism and other threats could easily flow from there into India. So the excuse of national security risks does not hold, because if security threats can and do arrive from Pakistan, which is more secure than Myanmar, then it only stands to reason and logic that Myanmar being porous and less secure*, will necessarily make it a ripe target from which National Security Threats to India would come from. But the BJP/Modi cannot include Myanmar because then it throws out the humanitarian grounds of *minorities - see reasons outlined in A and B above. D. The clearest example of the inhumanity of the CAB is what it will do with the Muslims of Assam and then potentially the rest of India - if what Amit Shah says is true that CAB and NRC should be rolled out to all of India. The bill is clearly stating that the BJP/Modi hates Muslims so much that the bill will give a get out clause to everyone in Assam except the Muslims, because they (the Hindus, Sikh, etc,) will simply need to state they fled the neighboring countries due to Religious persecution and since CAB specifically lists them (as being persecuted minorities in those countries - which they are*) they will *all get a path to Citizenship in India and Muslims are left in no mans land, stateless without any representation and rights. If Bangladesh or other countries turn around and state they will not take in any individuals that cannot prove citizenship for their requisite countries... then what happens to the Muslims in India who fall into this category? That is the most scary thing. the *Muslims will have no protections under the Indian constitution because they have no citizenship*. I have looked at this from every angle and I cannot escape the clear reality that CAB is Anti-Muslim to the core and the fact that Myanmar is not included in the countries means the bill is not rooted in Humanity, its rooted in the hatred of Muslims, because every UN and NGO report has confirmed that there is a genocide going on there and most importantly it shares a border with India from which people can and will come in, including Terrorist and other Security threats. The Muslims in India have done nothing wrong if they make a personal and free choice under a constitutionally secular nation they should not be targeted with bigoted and hateful bills like CAB, that is plainly hating other human beings because of a personal choice to be Muslim or be born Muslim. The reaction to this bill will be a true test for India, because like the Germans who didn't believe in the Nazi ideology, but said and did nothing! In the face of hatred of Jews (because of bigoted and hateful propaganda describing Jews as a single group in hateful ways), in the face of that the German citizenry did nothing to protest and resist and as a result the Nazi's massacred and murdered in cold blood over 6 million innocent, unarmed, Jews who had wives, and children and parents and families and friends and pets and went to work and had a life they were leading, this is where the BJP/Modi is wanting to take the citizenry of India and if there isn't immediate outrage, protest and resistance to this bill, then it may be that the end result is like that of Germany - a people and nation that will forever be known and remembered as those that DID NOTHING to stop hate and murder, when they had the chance to do so. No one has explained what will happen with all the Muslims in India (mainly in rural areas and are poor and illiterate) who cannot show documents they are Indian. If the CAB and NRC are rolled out nationally then 200 million Muslims will feel threatened and no other sovereign country will give a stateless people a path to citizenship if they can't prove they have any documents linking them to India. So what is the solution? There will be massive civil unrest and potentially civil war, giving your enemies exactly what they wanted and it was all handed to them because of the short sighted and bigoted vision of the BJP/Modi. It must be resisted and that is a none Indian who is giving a clear warning of the consequences of CAB.

Aajtak hallo bol debate😂😂😂 seems like they will kill each other , illiterate people

@@emilezola8546 Didn't you watched the debate? There he said with what motive immigrants came? Religion or financial? If religion you're welcomed if no then please go back.

@@nay.m obviously he hasn't...he was busy sharing his assumptions and hypothesis.

@@emilezola8546 needs improvement. Improve presentation.give holistic positive conclusion.

on the contrary none made sense, he first says ahmadiyas chose to go in pakistan, then so did the hindus who chose to stay back in pakistan. how does he give the hindus a chance to come in and say ahmadiyas will not be taken. so his whole point to prove minority prosecution is that only hindus face persecution. that makes no sense

secondly he says bengali hindus be distrubuted in other states so that indeginous people of NE stay happy. Then muslims who came who have been living there be thrown out? so you want to cater a particular community and stray the muslims. So this whole episode of giving citizenship on basis of persecution has lost its cause because your catering a community and persecuting the other.

@@sankalpc9492 Ahmeddiyas are a SECT of islam. Its not a religion. ISLAM discriminating within each other(casteism) is not our headache since all the 3 countries are Islamic theocratic state with Islam being state religion and "constitutionally" biased towards non-muslims

@@kaluah4376 my point was never that ahmediyas are a religion or not. It is question of giving citizenship to persecuted individuals,now how does one differentiate persecution on the basis of religion,sect,caste,creed,job etc. Because all persecuted must be allowed to apply for citizenship not religion wise. That my dear friend goes against our constitution. Our constitution does not recognise religion,caste,creed,work it says equality to all.

@@sankalpc9492 Looks like you haven't read our Constitution at all. Our constitution recognise caste, religion etc for OUR CITIZENS (article 15) not for Foreigners or Aliens. Constitution doesn't say anything about what filters the state will use to filter foreigners. The persecuted minorities from these 3 countries are accepted because they are persecuted not just by the government but by their constitution itself. This countries are Islamic Theocratic state, which by default is biased towards religions. India thus being a neighbour accepted these minorities. Read and learn more start with Laxmikanth, before talking like illiterates quoting random Constitution Articles and having no Idea what they are in reality.

6:35 This is the Answer to those who are crying for Ahmedias & Shias in Pakistan. 🙄

well said bro

From where, he is?

lets apply the same logic in another case ,, Mr j sai deepak knows that two nation theory was propagated by V d savarkar ,,, i wonder what would his thoughts be for him ,,,, he wants to look this in the continuum of two nation theory ,,, why jsut two lets extend this principle to other communieeis two and why just on the basis of religion lets do it in the basis of caste too ,,, there is a strong reason why we must continues to disregard two nation theory or in the end we will divide this whole country in innumerable parts ,,, in today's world there are millions of hindus living in non hindu countries once these countries start behaving so discriminatorily agaisnt us then what will happen ,, its very easy for any govt to nominate a whole community as a threat ,,, its the same thing which britishers did by nominating a whole community as "criminals" during colonial times ,,

j sai deepak might be a good speaker and has vast knowledge in his field but he is definitely a communal bigot ,, and i knw this because i have seen his twitter ,,, i have stopped wathcing RS tv a long time back becuas eit has become a stooge of a ideology and nothing more

Now u muslim know deeply that cAA is must in india

On this platform its always been like this. I have been watching for years. :)

@@tajinderkaur8492 I have instantly subscribed to this channel right after the video ended. Hoping to see some more discussions around different topics.

Although very late but good for you that you found this finally.

@@tajinderkaur8492 same here

@@ishanverma4944 you will never find any stupidity in this channel

Any truthful person would have grave reservations about Mr Deepak explained. The CAB was a political and global statement about the BJP and Mr Modi. The NRC was instituted under Secular principles, which is why in conjunction with the Muslims the Hindu's, who could not prove their citizenship, in Asaam were both deemed stateless - that's fair, because its completely secular and therefore applies to all who cannot show they are a citizen of India. A secular, democratic constitution is that which, at its root, enshrines personal freedoms for everyone!*. The cleanest and most effective *test of Secularism under the principles of Freedom to Choose is Religion! Religion is the most personal and spiritual aspect any individual should be absolutely free to make. That's Secularism and that was the test of the NRC in Asaam. The NRC failed precisely because there was uproar in the North Eastern provinces due to the reality of people being linked by Tribe and Religion rather than a National Border, people living on both sides of the border (of the same ethnicity, race, religion, culture, tribe and families) did not want to have an identity card and everyone be checked all the time to see which side of a National Border they belonged, etc. and also families and people moved and wanted to stay for as long as they want without, what they thought, were draconian laws by people not of their tribe/culture. Its why millions of Hindus along with Muslims were deemed stateless in Assam and an associated uproar as a result. The CAB is essentially stating this: Muslims are not welcome in India and the ones in India are hated and should leave and worse India will Potentially Detain You if You cannot show You are who India wants You to be - anything but Muslim. The reason CAB is xenophobic, bigoted, fascist in the context of Anti-Muslim hatred, is because his argument breaks down in the context of Myanmar. A. If this was not about Islam and Muslims, the BJP/Modi would have had to include Myanmar, because the bill is an extension of the Citizens Act, so it must apply to all countries from which people could possibly come and become citizens and reside in India. Myanmar must be included in that, because it shares a physical border with India and the first external country a nation should enact Citizenship against or in the context of, is a bordering Country! That just Citizenship 101. B. If this was not about Islam and Muslims, then the list would have included All Religious minorities that are persecuted period, the secular principles enshrined in the Indian Constitution would be obeyed and India would pass the test of being Secular and Democratic. But the BJP/Modi, named the religions that are persecuted and if they had mentioned, specifically, Myanmar then the persecuted minorities would necessarily have included Rohingya Muslims (who are a, clearly, persecuted minority in Myanmar). There are 40,000 Rohingya in India at the moment, where the BJP government are being taken to the supreme court, because the BJP want to return them, in clear violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which India is a signatory to and therefore is obliged to protect those fleeing death and persecution, which every UN report has shown, is the case for the Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar. C. The arbitrary choice of including Afghanistan over Myanmar is deeply disturbing. The claim is that Afghanistan is a security risk, due to Terrorism from there, via Pakistan. This is flawed logic for two primary reasons: 1. India shares porous borders with Pakistan, Bangladesh, Myanmar that are not or cannot be secured. So including Afghanistan seems to be the case because its a Muslim country and has a minority set that includes Hindu's, specifically, otherwise why choose it over, say Burkina Faso, Syria, Iraq (where Christians and other minority faiths) are persecuted? 2. If threats can arrive to India via Afghanistan, then why not Myanmar? India should be secured against Myanmar too - its virtually unmanned and unregulated. Terrorism and other threats could easily flow from there into India. So the excuse of national security risks does not hold, because if security threats can and do arrive from Pakistan, which is more secure than Myanmar, then it only stands to reason and logic that Myanmar being porous and less secure*, will necessarily make it a ripe target from which National Security Threats to India would come from. But the BJP/Modi cannot include Myanmar because then it throws out the humanitarian grounds of *minorities - see reasons outlined in A and B above. D. The clearest example of the inhumanity of the CAB is what it will do with the Muslims of Assam and then potentially the rest of India - if what Amit Shah says is true that CAB and NRC should be rolled out to all of India. The bill is clearly stating that the BJP/Modi hates Muslims so much that the bill will give a get out clause to everyone in Assam except the Muslims, because they (the Hindus, Sikh, etc,) will simply need to state they fled the neighboring countries due to Religious persecution and since CAB specifically lists them (as being persecuted minorities in those countries - which they are*) they will *all get a path to Citizenship in India and Muslims are left in no mans land, stateless without any representation and rights. If Bangladesh or other countries turn around and state they will not take in any individuals that cannot prove citizenship for their requisite countries... then what happens to the Muslims in India who fall into this category? That is the most scary thing. the *Muslims will have no protections under the Indian constitution because they have no citizenship*. I have looked at this from every angle and I cannot escape the clear reality that CAB is Anti-Muslim to the core and the fact that Myanmar is not included in the countries means the bill is not rooted in Humanity, its rooted in the hatred of Muslims, because every UN and NGO report has confirmed that there is a genocide going on there and most importantly it shares a border with India from which people can and will come in, including Terrorist and other Security threats. The Muslims in India have done nothing wrong if they make a personal and free choice under a constitutionally secular nation they should not be targeted with bigoted and hateful bills like CAB, that is plainly hating other human beings because of a personal choice to be Muslim or be born Muslim. The reaction to this bill will be a true test for India, because like the Germans who didn't believe in the Nazi ideology, but said and did nothing! In the face of hatred of Jews (because of bigoted and hateful propaganda describing Jews as a single group in hateful ways), in the face of that the German citizenry did nothing to protest and resist and as a result the Nazi's massacred and murdered in cold blood over 6 MILLION INNOCENT, UNARMED, JEWS who had wives, and children and parents and families and friends and pets and went to work and had a life they were leading, this is where the BJP/Modi is wanting to take the citizenry of India and if there isn't immediate outrage, protest and resistance to this bill, then it may be that the end result is like that of Germany - a people and nation that will forever be known and remembered as those that DID NOTHING to stop hate and murder, when they had the chance to do so. If there is no protest and resistance to this bill then the people of India have spoken and their silence will be a conscious choice to let hate spread to the core of what it is to be an Indian Nation with all the colors under the sun. Its an indefensible bill period.

Then why do you have religion specific laws defeating secular constitution? Who are you fooling you bigot?

@@ruskinbond7617 because those minority are left to rape and genocide by a religion based country like islamic republic of bangladesh and islamic republic of pakistan

Ruskin Bond we have reservations in our country for religious minorities. So we do have laws based on religion but that is to protect them. We earlier were trying to protect the minority of our state but now we have also resorted for the protection of minorities in other states as well

@abhay rajput of course religion is important but in India all religions are important. India is not a country only for Hindus. When you travel down south to Kerala you will a lot of the population is Muslim, Mizoram, Nagaland and Goa have Christians in majority, Punjab has as many Sikhs as Hindus and J &K have a lot of Muslim population as well. So if secularism was not there amongst the people, being a part of the same country would not have been possible. Although the word secularism came later on, the constitution never promoted anyone religion

@balu049 so? every hindu should be a pro-hindu activist.Enough of shithousery of secularism

@balu049 yes I came to know after sabrimala Ayodhya and CAB debates....and his Twitter

@Basavaraj C I only care for hindu civilization. I am communal. I just don't care for anything else.

@Basavaraj C ohh my my. I love them. Even bring in Greeks if they exist. No probs whatsoever but sorry not those who burnt down 9millions books of nalanda.

ashok singh he is Modi Bhakt

Becoz he speaks fast?

@@NaseeruDinJahangeer no his points are really valid and he stick to the point no diversion from the ques ..

@@NaseeruDinJahangeer Haha because I find it funny that you were not able to follow his debate to counter his points but rather attack his speed of speech itself

I found him absolutely biased sans any valid argument. He emphasized on 2 nation theory,what has Afghanistan to do with that? He overlooked NRC which excludes illegal migrants ( but expect muslims) do get a back door entry via CAA. Infact,religion can never be a basis to define a citizen in secular India. Anyways,what is our population now? What about unemployment rate? What about farmers distress? Kaha bithao in lougo ko,abhi goud mein? India is not a charity home,we need to put our house in order,we are in recession,why should we take extra burden when our own people are in poverty and malnutrition? So,have some sense before throwing your shameless arguments.

Have a huge respect for J sai Deepak but today he seemed Biased

Exactly...🙏

Swamy sharanam 🙏

@john doe Oooo followers of paedophile got angry??

​@john doe You rosary people, it's better if you stop talking about idol worship. You are a cult of genocidal maniacs arguing for religious supremacy.

@john doe this is what is deeply problematic and there lies the bone of contention...expecting each and everyone to subscribe to your school of thought.. and if someone doesn't ridicule him by calling him a brainless fanboy.... you may try to masquerade as someone very 'cool' by ridiculing idol worshippers but the fact is either your brain doesn't have the ability to register the esotericism which lies behind idol worship or you lack the scholarship of our scriptures....Dont let your ignorance transpire from your comments

True very true

No there own identity is problem for india

@Ali Hanif sir... Actually this persecution is quoted by giving the reference of partition. So we don't have such connect with Myanmar. It's not a party in partition. And if commenting like Malaysia, Indonesia, bangladesh, and many other are not accepting them..... 👍👍

@Ali Hanif okay🙂 Can be clearly seen how your brain and arguments works on the basic assumption of 'BJP and Modi are anti-muslims' and that all this is a 'conspiracy'. Thus, arguing with you, even with facts is pure waste of time. Let the court decide shall we?☺️ Unless you have a doubt on the Indian courts too🙄

@Ali Hanif I don't know why Bharat should open it's doors to Muslims outside of Bharat? Bharat is Hindu. That's a fact. So, first preference is for Hindus of these countries. Simple. And so, foreign civilizational enemies will not be accepted. because accepting those who think non believers are the worst of creatures is just unjustifiable. 🙂

Going to watch it again!

for example , An indian muslim was not able to produce required documents before NRC Assam, So he is an illegal citizen, Now If a Hindu Bengali comes He will be received on the grounds of Religion

@@mmanoj1671 You need to do a 3 month recourse on the same video to get the point. Ctrl+Alt+Delete NDTV falsehood and then watch and comprehend the debate...

I respect Sai Deepak sir for all the legal luminary he is, but when it comes to the issue related to religion, he is certainly biased. His Indic agenda makes his arguments so biased.

@@byabangad4609 n what z d reason of his being biased........ Can u please think of it on the basis of true facts........jus see what z going on international arena, what equations are around us, specially our neighbouring country....

Pakistan and Bangladesh can be excused for a moment, but what about Afghanistan? What is need of including it? Further Article 14 is applicable to all, irrespective of nationality. Now if they invoke 15 or 16, then they are strictly for citizens. Hence they cant be invoked. I guess Art 14’s “equal protection of law” part could be invoked here.

Not here to argue endlessly. I’m from Arunachal and I’m neither Muslim, nor Hindu nor Christian nor Buddhist. Just dig a little deeper and do the necessary background check of Sir Sai Deepak. Internet is powerful; you can do the fact checks yourself. My only point of disagreement with him is his biasses when it comes to the issue of religion. Otherwise, he is a first rate intellectual.

@@byabangad4609 bt tht doesn't mk his arguements irrational, does it?? U bttr counter him with arguements

Haha...the same way i thought

May be..but its good step..atleast here we have a govt less accountable to foreign more reactive on domestic issues. btw im amazed to see that gentlmen speak too infornt of camera..rare nowadays.

for example , An indian muslim was not able to produce required documents before NRC Assam, So he is an illegal citizen, Now If a Hindu Bengali comes He will be received on the grounds of Religion

I think more than J Sai Deepak sir, they have taken help from Mr Harish Salve.

@@mmanoj1671 and how is that bad?

they work for trp and money

This is our traditional news Channel.

bcz The others are Doing that for TRP..

this is a traditional news channel but only for UPSC aspirants.

@@hondaxyz UPSC people prefer this channel so that they get just facts and truth. It is not the case that only UPSC aspirants see Doordarshan news channels.

How you follow his videos? Other available at any other channel?

@@harmonylearning4329 search Sai deepak on youtube, many videos are there

What is the result of NRC in Assam moron

@@ThirdEye0077 hey many illegal bangladeshi.s muslims has got nrc in assam by forgery and fraud.... just learn about the population of muslims in assam...specially bangladeshi muslims

Illegal is Illegal..be it Hindu or Muslim or any other religion. India must not take responsibility for that.

WhatsApp University Graduate? Lol

@@ThirdEye0077 in 1971 nearly 1.5 crore Illegal bangladeshi muslim immigrants flooded into Assam. The NRC initial count of 45 lacs, was reduced to 19 lacs illegals. What about the balance of 1.31 crores 😱😱😱

Gautam Sen is a pro leftist that doesn't care about India's sovereign and security interests

😂😂👍

I am a leftist and from West Bengal. I would literally do anything to ensure that illegal immigrants who come and steal our jobs are sent back to their native land. It is pretty easy to distinguish Bangladeshi dialect from my mother tongue. Send them back.🙏🏻 Our health system in the state is under collapse because of influx of patients who get free treatment citing illegal citizenship. This world isn’t all flowers and rainbows and if we have to choose someone we should prioritise our own community.

Have you people read about his contribution in NE regions. He is one of the best civil servants of this country. Please read before you speak. If someone doesn't agree with you it doesn't mean they are against you.

Gautam sen should be asked why do nagaland has 88% christianity and it is the most baptist state in the whole world. Read about the persecution of indegenious people in Nagaland, Mizoram and Manipur.

Indeed , but he should answer another of his class kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eqiZfMuZsNGXj2w.html

@@one-bm6lz That will be interesting to watch. But I believe J Sai will make him understand. Apart from knowledge of Indian Constitution and law, J Sai has knowledge of Indian History and culture which is main plus point of him.

@@guhan4606 do you even know what does bigot mean? Can you give example of him being bigot?

Soo true, After seeing many foolish remarks on CAB being spread on social media, I feel like everyone needs to know these facts.

for example , An indian muslim was not able to produce required documents before NRC Assam, So he is an illegal citizen, Now If a Hindu Bengali comes He will be received on the grounds of Religion

@@mmanoj1671 Yes because the Bengal(east pakistan) was formed based on religion and and if you cannot prove your citizenship you cannot call yourselves 'Indian' Muslim you are just a muslim

Hahaha..moral values..what moral values does this bill uphold. What's the definition of the indigenous identity

Kartik Mahajan given you understand shite about indian politu and history, keep your tongue in your place.

Saptarshi Choudhur It's not 'neighbour countries", it's "Bangladesh, Pakistan, Afghanistan"

Yes, minorities of those countries that are Muslim majority. Sounds much better.

@Ali Hanif Well said brother.

Ali Hanif Indonesia has brought a law where Sharia will be implemented on non muslims as well. do you have a word to say about that.

Ali Hanif it didn't fail, you got to have security inputs on communities you want to give citizenship. and not only Indian security agencies but bangladesh security agencies have also said that Al Qaeda has penetrated into rohingya community.

And bangladesh

And West Bengal. Don’t get me started about WB.

@@dokidoki719 THEN WHY DO U GUYS VOTE FOR CPI & TMC IN 2021 VOTE FOR B.J.P

And there are people from proxima century b I have some real issues about that

@@GTR-93 because people gets killed, their women raped and their houses burnt if they vote for BJP

I guess that would be because they want to listen to speakers and not shouters on those stupid private channels.. lol. Glad more people are getting onto rajya sabha tv and dd news.

Because they debate on the basis of facts and also they donot shout 😂

@Ali Hanif The issue of Rohingyas was dealt with in this debate by Deepak.. they are a security threat and we don't want to help anyone at the cost of our own security! Them being native to Bangladesh ( a de facto Islamic theocracy) is another reason we need not take them.. Everything about the bill made sense to me ... Except for why the ahmadiyas and Sufis were not included ( bringing the issue of two nation theory isn't a good argument in my opinion. When there is human rights violation ,you can't simply say "you asked for it and now you reap what you sow !" That isn't a good argument!) and As your second point says..the act's repercussions on Indian Muslims who don't have the necessary documents to prove their citizenship is a matter of concern even for me! I don't understand why that was not discussed!

Good they are not. They are pretty good here why spoil them.

No no it's ok be to here. Let's them play in fish market, we are happy over here and intellectuals don't entertain TRP based channels

They don't want to bark and these are professionals

India wants to compete with China in terms of population and not economy...God have mercy on this country 🤣🤣🤣

@jyotirmoy NRC is meant for that. All these people are already living in India. CAB gives citizenship to some of them. NRC will send remaining illegal trespassers back.

@@hammukho6062 nrc aa raha hai to take care of your fancies danger.

Because the subject topic is CAB.

N I think you did not watch the programme well enough. Few Points: 1) The people we are talking about in CAB are already living in parts of India, so already consuming resources. 2) The cut off date is 2014, which means people who came after 2014 will not be considered under this Bill. 3) Most importantly you are forgetting that we are talking about people who are being persecuted because of their “religion”, that is their very identity. I hope you understand.

N no problem they are already residing in india so no new burden. And when rohingya aa rahe toh koi burden nahin ped raha tha kyon. Aur vipkash isliye halla nahi macha rahi ki unhone nagrikta kyon de j thi hain h chahe rahe hain ki isme muslim kyon nahi include hue taki unki vote bank kam na ho jaye. Hum govt ko poori tarah support karte hain unke is kadam pe. Iss desh se pahle hi do muslim desh ban chuke hain. We dont need more muslim. Forget about secularism if muslim became majority.

Constitution is not above people. It is for people. People are not for constitution.

N we are not buying opposition to agenda.

@Sourav its very

@Himanshu Pant If that is the case, Where does Afghanistan come into the picture?

@Rakesh Kumar Community? No one here asks citizenship for LTTE militants. Civilians who fled the country due to racial persecution. Also I do not blindly support granting citizenship to them. A debate on this point here in RSTv is something which I expected.