the amount of square kilometers your mother covers

19^999999

@@coolchannel876 it says IN GEOMETRY DASH

@@coolchannel876 scg(100) found it while counting from 0 to scg(100)

Hey cob amazing stream and i was in there i joined as soon as i got the notifications cause its not every day i see a video from you Literally

clutterfunk caused the big bang

I'm still so confused and genuinely concerned for the universe considering a square game requires like literally infinite clicks to pass its insane

@@ignorantethan656 can't let go was the big bang

@@ignorantethan656 no bloodbath because it exploded in popularity

the level is impossible because it would requires your finger to move faster than the universal constant (speed of light) to click enough, so the level doesnt break the laws of the universe, it requires you to break the laws of the universe to be able to pass it, which makes it impossible

Genshim Impact players and LOL Players: I am a joke to you?

7.9 b people

*Cursed* with immortality

Lol

Outside?

they didn’t

Hyperbola actually said it in the official showcase. Check the pinned comment on that video.

great now explain how does subcubic graph number works

@@nonickname5086 it works with math.

@@masterioannis6438 r/techicallythetruth

@Evan Dedels Ok but how BIG is SCG(100)?

@Evan Dedels Oh..

No joke a few years ago it took me over 300 attempts 💀

e

It took me 900 when I was 7

can’t remember exactly/might be wrong but it took me over 2k attempts in 2015

i used to be on chromebook and the 30-40 fps made stereo madness a memory game and it took me 5000 attemps to beat it but now im running lite on an emulator on a windows laptop thats like 10x faster and i breezed through until dry out

It would be the understatement of the century

@@bryantofsomething5964 nah, underestimate of the *ETERNITY*

@@andynilsennot4329 ...and that will be the understatement of omniverse

It’s called how not why

@@cringeman4823 Why?

@@phqrronkere please stop

@@PearlGods why?

“Why”??????

*bloodbath flashback starts*

😳

@@Cobgd a

@@Cobgd a

@@Cobgd a

TY Achlys :)

@@Cobgd of course of course! Your content puts a smile on my face and everyone else who watches it! Keep it up my guy!

@@GDAchlys ❤

@@Cobgd yo cob you know how to deal with haters that say offensive things and then make you look like the bad guy by editing the comment or deleting it?

@@overlord2754 just ignore lol

FR BRO

so the biggest number is like 100k or something?

My hardest is base after base fr

Where can i see how many digits scg100 has

@@mikeohearn9318 nowhere. but i can say the number of digits is definitely bigger than TREE(3)

@@samsonsamsonnikov7281 dam

@@mikeohearn9318 well, I can't tell you that I in fact know just how big this is, but I do take some math with graphic functions in analytical geometry, and I do know that there is something called exponencial growth (which can be represented almost always by Euler's number), and I could try experimenting with SCG a few days so I could give you a concrete answer, but just so we can measure it now, considering that the bigger the SCG function value, the more it's growth increases exponentially, take a look at SCG(2) value.. SCG(2) = 3 × 2(3 × 2^95) − 8 ≈ 3.241704 × 10^35775080127201286522908640066. With this measure we can see that SCG(100) is so impossible that I think it is even bigger than googolplex to the power of another googolplex, one googolplex is (10^(10^100)), now let's put it to perspective, a googol is 1 followed by 100 zeros, a googolplex is 10 with a googol zeros after it.. that's ridiculous, lmao, I quit writting more thant that rn.

@@themanthatlaughs.9031 thanks alot kinda crazy how you could give such a good answer to a inaccurate question

And arrow notation! How could you forget about that?

Bro I don't even know how you need FGH to display fps count. Do you want your computer to have an explosion as strong as 10^5000 tons of antimatter?

cause infinity isnt a number (technically)

infinity is basically equal to everything, even if you cube 10^10578 x (42 octillion^10^10578 + 10^10578), you still won't reach infinity

even timesing that by the atoms in the universe^SCG(100) x 340 undecillion^10^10578 won't get you to infinity

@@theotherdashmelted SCG(SCG(SCG...(SCG(100) SCG's)...(SCG(SCG(SCG(100) is still much, much farther to infinity. You will never reach it.

@@dundsdar and then times that by SCG(100) x SCG(100)^SCG(100) and multiply the result by SCG(100)^SCG(100)

TRUE

Truuue bro

Thanks :)

Dude thats something that is cool for a bug (if it existed)

no

there is literally no reason it would work like this at all under any circumstance

This would be only possible if the X-Pos was represented by integers and an integer overflow occurs. However, the x-pos is represented by floats, so this would not happen.

wut

Thank you :)

discord.gg/v4y4HXEWfR :)

True

nah that’s wavix but still

@@cryo8702 whos wavix

@AK47 exactly

@@matejastankovic1409 oh i get it

HiP Colour - Pixel Ghost :)

Yo thanks :)

So true

TRUE

that one kid in roblox

@@Sleepyperso me:

@@Sleepyperso what people think mobile looks like

There are ≈10^185 Planck volumes in the universe.

we trust tio2

Cool idea

Yes

Yos

Yes

It's a false.

Rice

isnt it 256 units

@@ThePrimeYeeter x position freezing

HHHUUUUUUUHHHHH????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

wow nessus is just insane xd

So we got 2147483647, We got 1098 nestings (if that even makes sense) and now we got 2147483647 to the power of 1098.

tower sucks anyway. imagine wasting 3k objects and making them explode your computer just to make it reach 35 trillion clicks. i can do it in just 7 obj

@@lumi2030 true just stack pickup triggers

Itshhh correction time! 🤓☝️

@KJH0814 im on that good kush and alcohol

discord.gg/v4y4HXEWfR discord.gg/nKxG3xXhre here :)

🤓

@@gCarrot ???

now imagine how much FPS you have while playing what

it's not actually the SCG function, but rather the pair sequence system. they correspond to the same ordinal in the fast growing hierarchy, their growth rates are similar.

@@lumi2030 Ok, but its still way too large for anyone to believe it's in GD

@@mattheworchard481 would you believe me if i said i made something even larger than that? something that reaches the inaccessible OCF level? i also made pncx itself btw

The fast-growing subcubic graph number sequence surpasses TREE(3) by SCG(13), and the simple subcubic graph number sequence (SSCG) surpasses TREE^TREE(3)(3) by SSCG(3.)

This comment is genuinely a giant, enormous and large understatement

SCG(100) would be insanely, incomprehensibly larger than that. So incomprehensible that I struggle to put it into words. So mindblowingly larger. Not even 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001% of SCG(100). It loses all meaning at that point.

Understatement of the century

@@bryantofsomething5964 fr

Thanks :)

@@Cobgd did you credit wahoo?

Thank you cob btw

True!

Yup man

goofy disco mods looking for a gurl up until "to the end of time" just so they can feel honored by sitting in that chair for forever

what is the "a" function

@@lumi2030 I dont know but I think its ackerman

@@jojo989GD ackermann? idk, i saw my level tower of oblivion on it whose click count reaches further than ackermann

@@lumi2030 then idk what the "a" means, I don't know much about googology

@@jojo989GD a means nothing, it is an undefined function.

not bigger than scg

n o

Hahahaha That's a good joke

i gotchu fam makingn it rn

it already is

LMAO

Update: I at least found scg(13)

@@alpine8590 SCG is the subcubic graph function

phorne

⁠@@disqualify.I almost said p***

they work in a similar way but scg(100) is far, far bigger

SCG(3) bigger than Tree(Tree(Tree(....Tree(3)))...)) with Tree(3) tree's

@@tobyconner5827 then thanks

@@SelentGD i just said they are similar because of BIG case and these brackets, not because value

They are not similar

Already done but cool idea :)

@@Cobgd K thx for the reply

I meant to add a comma after the k. Oops!🤣

Fictional googology:

If you are wondering what it is It’s a way easier version of a 3 by 3 that has unique turning Its a 3 by 3 shape. mod more it’s more like a skewb

I just solved my first 2x2 lol.

It came today.

My mom is buying me a skewb

@@cleildagomes9199 Lol I just got my 2. By 2 and I’m trying to solve it coincidence?