Teenage girl who wanted nothing to do with politics, grabbed by the collar into their mess.

Yeah, i agree. Jayne Has a sad story

Really sad those power hungry monsters were their own parents.

@@ladyv5655 The tale told by her servants was that Guildford's mother was so broken up on the day her daughter-in-law and son were to get beheaded that she stayed at her country estate for a day long sexual romp with her stable boy, who at 19, was just Guildford's age. Maybe he became a surrogate son eventually.

Historians differ in their views. I have seen documentaries which claim that she was a schemer and knew exactly what she was doing.

Soo

See

Especially after seeing her husbands body and head being brought into the very tower where she was. Her panic must have been unfathomable.

Imagine if she gets to the execution site, and they say "We've decided to try a saw..."

Horrific.

@M.Almudena Sanz Sanz yeah imagine if Lady Jane Grey was never killed she could have had a better life with Gilford and they both could have had children and if Lady Jane Grey looked after her health and was healthy then she would have ruled England in 1603 that would be interesting on what Elizabeth would think since Elizabeth hated both of Lady Jane Greys younger sister in-fact could Lady Jane Grey have been a bigger threat to Elizabeth then Mary Queen of Scots and imagine if she was not killed either and heard that instead of giving the crown to her they will give it to Lady Jane Grey now that would be interesting all around Europe and the Stewart’s if Lady Jane grey became queen of England in 1603 or if she is dead her children do you think Lady Jane grey could have been a bigger threat then Mary queen of Scots and in 1603 the death bed of Elizabeth I wonder if she would accept Lady Jane grey as air or do you think she would possibly might give the crown to Mary queen of Scots

If Mary was the rightful heir Jane Grey would never have been a threat would she? The fact remains that Jane Grey was legit due to her cousin choosing her as his heir. Mary was nothing but powerhungry.

@@dgray3771 but what is Elizabeth the 1 did choose Lady Jane grey and so did her council then is Mary queen of Scots was still under house arrest or she left England and ran to Spain in 1587 rather then being killed and married Philip the second of Spain could Jane after be tuff like Elizabeth in 1603 if Jane was elected as queen

No she wasn't and the proof is in englands subservience to the devil people that now are walking through the halls and churches and streets of england

Mary was declared illegitimate by parliament and Lady Jane was left the throne lawfully by Edward. Jane also had the same lineage as James 1st so was he not King?

Yep, and the (relatively minor) theological differences between the two are, and remain, just a pretext for a battle over power, control and wealth. That poor girl was just another pawn in that kind of game.

It was a terrible conflict all over Europe. Thousands and thousands died over their differences. And Mary burned so many people alive. She was a real monster.

@@bfc3057 Elizabeth had catholic traitors executed usually by the axe or hung, drawn and quartered she didn't actually have any burnt at the stake because of their religion unlike her sister

Amen to that, @TRJ

@@MasterJediDude Protestant propaganda.

Who? Queen Jayne?

And oxney bottom in kent

No such thing as too many ghost stories....

I live in the midlands and there’s 2 ghost stories Ik , apparently she has been seen in a carriage running away from her old castle at Brad gate park and then there’s a road where people have reported to have seen a women standing on the side of the road or Walking in the road and there’s been loads of car crashes there supposedly bcus of her walking in the road

@@kochenmarson3852 that creeps me out! I often drive roads alone at night! They become lonely creepy places especially if you have patches of mist and fog which is common! Looks like ill be taking the dog in the car with me for the next few weeks 😂

Stay tuned for something very interesting from here very soon…

No shit?!? How freaking neat!!! I love the care Brits show to your English Heritage sites! I personally indulge, perhaps to excess, in channels like English Heritage. I'm nutty for Mrs. Crocombe!!!

Indeed. A victim of men's machinations, like Kathryn Howard. I applaud HRH(?) Grey's dedication to her faith! Even though I'm staunchly Catholic, I still hold admiration for true martyrs of any faith.

You mean she is an ancestor of yours unless you are a time traveller. You will actually be an indirect distant descendant

@@pedanticradiator1491 tomato tomahto 🙄

@@markjulianoriginalhooli2217 descendant avd ancestor are the opposite of each other so it's not like tomato tomato

@@pedanticradiator1491 ok potatoe potato🤨

She probably would have chosen to live a quiet life. Sure doesn’t sound like she wanted power... wouldn’t even wear the crown when it was given to her.

Executed, not murdered. She tried to avoid the charge of treason if Mary or Elizabeth were declared the heir. This way she could claim the privy council had offered the crown but she did not ask for it, claim to be the heir and did not accept it. Mary had her executed to deny the protestants anyclaim to the crown through the Grey/Dudley fsction. This left Elizabeth as the only other possible claimant but she had been disinherited byher father Henty 8. Mary was always concerned that a protestsnt faction would take possession of Elizabeth and overthrow Mary .

They were all highly trained noble ladies. They were pretty much professional at it. At a level that you can barely imagine. They were not dumb and they would understand fully that being good at their jobs would be life or death to them and possibly to those around them. You can think it was a huge pressure on these young girls (and boys too by the way). You would be right to think that. However, they were groomed by their relatives to perform. And they pretty much had no escape. They could not just say I "I quit and will just be a commoner over there". It was not that easy. Their entire lives were dependent on them doing what they were expected to do. This came together with marrying with people they did not know, performing all kinds of official duties.....and.....yes....dying with dignity if it came to that.

People who praise God under those circumstances are true disciples of Christ who know where they're going after death & know also that anger and resentment not only does no good, it actually is something Christ taught against and with good reason. The Christians that Nero tied together and used as a torch to light city streets often marched to their death singing because they knew the truth. Give your heart to Christ and you'll understand because you'll know the truth also.

@@bethanydee1920 u must be a Yank

@@bethanydee1920 Not wanting to question anyone´s religion. But I will just note that powerful people have their very own particular concepts when it comes to religion. If they did believe and follow everything.....they would not find themselves in positions of power and would not be able to do a lot of what they do. This is not to say they do not believe in some God or Jesus. Quite positive some of them honestly believe there is something else out there. The problem is the way in which they understand things. For instance....Jane Grey and Mary Tudor would never have fought if they really followed Jesus. Its absolutely nonsensical to fight for different versions of what is practically the same belief. Much more nonsensical because Jesus supposedly preached peace and love. So....you need to be somewhat removed from Jesus teachings in order to even start a war between protestants and catholics. And they did....they pretty much fought a civil war in between them. Lucky for England that it lasted only 9 days. But it could have been another War of the Roses. Both Mary and Jane were not eager to quit. Jane pretty much attempted to arrest her privy council with her at the Tower when the Mary started gaining the upper hand. All quite ambitious and not very Christian like behaviours.

@@bethanydee1920 What a dumb statement. It is the religion that killed her. Wake up, lady. There is no imaginary dude looking down from the skies. Never was.

I believe that is always done, the executioner asked for forgiveness not just with Jane and then they would pay him.

@@slytheringingerwitch ok

In any case, he did his job well and dispatched her quickly with one stroke.

Exactly. Just as Elizabeth Didn't want to kill Mary (Queen of Scots), Mary (Queen of England) didn't want to kill Jane.

In England

@@LuckyLukN10 wrong, it is in ireland

And countless of innocent "non-prominent" people. Sometimes for doing nothing wrong. Witch-trials? That was just the tip of the iceberg.

Google Renaissance humanism

A very broad education in all skills.

@@susanwebber9247 thanks

Agreed.... I was expecting... brutal death ... not a merciful one.

Definitely not like Margaret poles 👀👀🥶🥶

Yes, hers went much more smoothly than Queen Mary's had went.

Actually Dudleys father and brother were probably her first victims

To OP. "Bloody" Mary was a rank amateur compared to her father Henry VIII when it came to killing, persecution and destruction. 72,000 were executed during his reign. "Bloody" Mary burned 284 protestants in five years. Her predecessor, her half-brother Edward VI had over 5000 people killed (and he was just a child!). During the Prayer Book Rebellion of 1549, for example, more than 5,500 people died after they were told to change their religious practice. If you do the math, Mary was pretty kind compared to her father and brother. Dividing the number of people killed by the years of the reigns, leads to Henry VIII killing an average of 1946 people during each of his 37 years. Edward VI's six-year reign had 917 deaths per year while Mary only had 58 during each of her five years. Out of the three of them she was certainly the least bloody. Mary I gained the moniker "bloody" simply for burning protestants. As she was a Catholic later Protestant history demonized her, especially after the Glorious Revolution in 1688 when the constitution mandated a Protestant head of state. "Bloody" Mary was a name which became more commonplace in the 1700's. This was also a time when the *myth* spread that the Catholic Church had claimed the Earth was flat. This myth has endured to this day. In reality the ancient Greek Eratosthenes calculated the circumference of the Earth 250 BC. No Medieval sources ever mentions a flat Earth. Explanation of the Earth as a sphere already exists in the 1000's, from a copy of Bede, De Temporum Ratione, made in England or Normandy, late 11th or early 12th century. In 1240 there even is a depiction of people standing on a round earth from all angles, the French Gossuin de Metz’s ‘L’Image du Monde’ Victims? History? Better read up on it.

The skill of the executioner was crucial in both beheadings and hangings. Done well, they are among the least barbaric forms of execution. If multiple blows are required or the drop is too short, the reverse is true.

@@roberthudson1959 Hanging was foolproof and an instant death if done right. A long drop and a sudden stop. Neck snaps. Provided the noose is tight around the neck. Beheading however requires the executioner to be strong and accurate enough to land a good strike on the first try. Considering many executioners were drunk (as their work was considered both loathsome and sinful, and people ostracized them) this was far from certain. Hangings were far more common than beheadings but hangings were considered the punishment for the most common of thieves. Noblemen didn't get hanged. Even Saddam Hussein was upset in the early 21st century when he heard the Iraqi court was going to sentence him to death by hanging. Being a soldier he had hoped he would be executed by fire squad - a soldier's death.

Depended on the skill of the executioner. Elizabeth's step-sister Mary died a horrible death as the person swinging the axe was unskiled or drunk or both. Anne Boylen died quickly as the swordsman was a professional executioner - he actually hid the sword from her and distracted her so she never knew what was coming.

NO.

Yes, Mary ii who reigned jointly in her own right with King William iii, the only time England had joint reigning monarchs, known as William and Mary.

There’s only one Bloody Mary, no need to say I. Otherwise known as Mary Tudor. There there’s Mary II who reigned at the end of the 17th century.

But haven't you heard of the dangers of what can happen if you change history?? A small change can have dramatic change on the future.

Early Modern.

She butchered a bunch of teens who she herself claimed had no legitimacy. As if that is not a choice? And you think a rebellion would subside just because you killed 2 teens? She's named Bloody Mary for a reason.

No.

@@TheBatugan77 Not Ted Bundy's! The state of Florida had more compassion for him than he did for his victims.

Breeding within families.

Why are people so demented today?

There were early modern Europeans not medieval

@@pedanticradiator1491 There were plenty of executions taking place before the year 1500. The people highlighted in this video were about 15 to 30 years past being in medieval times since the medieval time period stretched into the late 1400's. So these people pretty much had the same barbaric mentality when it came to torturing and executions. Do you enjoy nitpicking?

@@tritosac yes at times I do

Because a lot of people don't accept that she was ever really a Queen

Then, yes; now, no

@@flyingphobiahelp sir, people are still killing each other over religion 😭

@@Seawitch555 Wanna make an omelet, you gotta break some eggs.

It's nonsensical. Dying and fighting over sky faires.

It was Her Father and Step Father that caused her execution.

power hungry men might have used her for power but it is her own cousin her own blood that had her executed. When in fact she should have protected her cousin. As a elder family member she not only failed her but couldn't show any mercy to her own young cousin. The girl was only 16/17 while she was 38! We are not talking about someone who could not have done anything to save her. She was queen and just did the most despicable act. Not only regicide but she's a kinslayer. She died much more peaceful than she deserved. And rightfully deserves the title of Bloody Mary.

Neither the idea of a queen regnant nor the idea of a Catholic monarch was especially popular, so Mary I's seat on the throne was far from steady. The people tolerated the former because they had no choice, but Mary's religion was an ongoing issue. As the closest legitimate Protestant heir (Elizabeth had been bastardized), Jane was an ongoing threat to the monarchy. She was doomed when Protestants rebelled in her name.

clean maksudnya satu kali pancung terus mati , tanpa 2 atau 3 kali jikalau mata kapak tumpul & orang dipancung itu seksa rasanya sebelum ajal.

Mary I reigned for a measly 5 years whereas Elizabeth I reigned for 45 years. Had Mary I reigned that long, would her kill count have been equal to her sister’s?

Bla bla bla, typical papal propaganda nonsense.

@@TheNabOwnzz Indeed. Especially since Henry VIII had 72,000 people executed and his son Edward VI had another 5500 executed. "Papal propaganda" indeed.

Unfortunately she wasn't.

It really is worrying when a factually incorrect comment gets thumbs-ups.

A lot of people don't accept she was ever Queen

@@pedanticradiator1491 in the will of Henry vi, Jane was to be the next Monarch due to the fact of his half sisters Mary and Elizabeth being declared illegitimate and thus being considered unfit to be monarch. That Queen Jane was not crowned Queen is irrelevant, an example being Edward viii not being crowned and yet he was known as King Edward viii.

@@stuartgraham5055 In Henry VIII's last will which was approved by Parliament he named his 2 daughters as successors if his son Edward VI died childless then after them came the Grey family. There is a video on the channel Useful Charts that details this. I do know you do not have to be crowned to be monarch and I personally accept Jane was Queen of England and Ireland. Also congratulations for saying crowned and not coronated.

Yes indeed. She was a profoundly faith-filled young woman.

...? It's the same thing.

@@TheNabOwnzz I'm a Baptist and the Baptist way is not necessarily the Bible Way or God's way but the Protestants and the Catholics have much to be desired on going by the Bible, and within these denominations there is a manipulation of God's way of salvation that can damn a soul to hell. All sinners need a Saviour and that Saviour is Jesus Christ, receive Him by faith alone.

@@douglascrosby5100 If you don't think it's God's way then why do you follow it? Such a weird thing to say. The things in the Bible appertaining to salvation aren't up for debate if you have thoroughly analyzed it. That Catholicism is an erroneous denomination is self-evident.

@@TheNabOwnzz My friend you're not grabbing the situation the size of your denomination doesn't make you right or wrong for sure you've read that Jesus said it's the Broadway that leads to destruction and many there be that go in there at, do you not know that there is no praying to Mary in the Bible or worshiping idols or statues do not know there is no monks or priests of the Catholic type or nuns in the Bible. There's no such thing as a confessional in the Bible or praying to saints. The head of you're so cool church is called a pope which means Holy Father that's blasphemy the term is only used once in the Bible to God the Father. The whole thing is a hodgepodge of traditions not Bible Christianity. It's a religion of the world with Christian words. Let the Bible be your authority and trust Jesus Christ as your Saviour today and don't put your faith and trust in a church or your sacraments. "But God be true and every man a liar"

People are bad. History is learning about people

@@scottessery100 Well said. The study of history is the study of human nature and maybe predicting the future

no, people from history did bad things. people from history also did good things. its important we remember history so we do not repeat past mistakes

History is written by the winners, right, wrong, or indifferent.

If we see executions done during henry viii we see its full of false "TREASON"

Catholic fanatic Queen Mary 1 you mean

Is this a joke? You can't think of a more 'painful and horrible' death than being beheaded? Bloody Catherine.

Yes unlike the loving Protestant Duke of Northumberland who risked a civil war to promote his dynastic claims.

Why would you say that? Seems the exact opposite is the truth. Jane could have changed religions and saved her life, but didn't knowing she would lose her life. It doesn't get much more courageous than that.

Girl imagine being her? Don't dare call her a coward and weak because u don't know what has she been through