The climate is lost when we fill this cube

  Рет қаралды 41,517

Simon Clark

Simon Clark

Күн бұрын

This video was created in partnership with Bill Gates, inspired by his new book “How to Avoid a Climate Disaster.” Find out more here: gatesnot.es/3bdZ4CK
In this video I talk about how much carbon we can emit into the Earth's atmosphere before climate change gets really serious. This is based on a paper published by Allen et al (2009) www.nature.com/articles/natur... which claims the atmosphere has a capacity of approximately one trillion tonnes of carbon. This capacity is contributed to by global carbon emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, and other compounds. In order to prevent catastrophic anthropogenic climate change, we must avoid emitting the trillionth tonne of carbon, it's that simple! Achieving this is of course is more difficult, and will involve sweeping changes to power generation, agriculture, transport, manufacturing, and more. This video is a brief introduction to how we need to change our economy in these sectors to limit carbon emissions and prevent catastrophic climate change.
You can support the channel by donating at / simonoxfphys
Check out my website! www.simonoxfphys.com/
--------- II ---------
My twitter - / simonoxfphys
My facebook - / youtubesimon
My insta - / simonoxfphys
My goodreads - / simonoxfphys
--------- II ---------
Music by Epidemic Sound: epidemicsound.com
Huge thanks to my supporters on Patreon: Josh Schiager, Farsight101, Liam Margetts, K.L, poundedjam, Alanah Mack, Stormchaser007 , Daan Sneep, Felix Freiberger, Robert Connell, Jaime Stark, Kolbrandr, , Sebastain Graf, Dan Nelson, Shane O'Brien, Fujia Li, Harry Eakins, Will Tolley, Nafi Iftekhar, Andrew Young, Cody VanZandt, Jesper Koed, Jovana, Albrecht Striffler, hennersfl, Federico Ameijenda, Jon Sjöberg, Igor Francetic, Jack Troup, Austin Frazee, SexyCaveman , James Munro, Oskar Hellström, Sean Richards, Kedar , Omar Miranda, Alastair Fortune, bitreign33 , Mat Allen, Anne Smith, Colin J. Brown, Princess Andromeda, Aron Kári Ágústsson, Leighton Mackenzie, BenDent , Charles Bray, Thusto , Andy Hartley, Lachlan Woods, Tim Boxall, Dan Hanvey, Simon Donkers, Kodzo , James Bridges, Liam , Andrea De Mezzo, Wendover Productions, Kendra Johnson.

Пікірлер: 463
@Alex-cp9zi
@Alex-cp9zi 3 жыл бұрын
Whilst I appreciate rising carbon emissions are bad, I couldn’t help but cheer them on each time just so I get to see that cool overflowing graphic lol
@SimonClark
@SimonClark 3 жыл бұрын
This is literally what I spend most of my time worrying about and I did exactly the same thing lol
@darrylrowe8193
@darrylrowe8193 2 жыл бұрын
DO you Climate Alarmist Charlatans Deny? It is Scientifically Proven Impossible for CO2 or the Greenhouse Effect to cause Global Warming!! And these Scientists Science can be Replicated!! Unlike Maurice Strong's 1988 IPCC Pseudo-Science, Global Warming Fear Charade, to give their Club of Rome/United Nations New World Order momentum for the 21st Century!! Signed by most countries in 1992, as Strong's IPCC, UNFCCC Agenda21!
@incvnsit
@incvnsit 2 жыл бұрын
@@darrylrowe8193 okay. Then why IS global warming happening
@thesilentone4024
@thesilentone4024 Жыл бұрын
@@SimonClark bro poop is a fantastic fertilizer human poop works to but only 1 or 2% of organic farms use it. Oh only 20% of farms are organic to so ya. Also diversity in New foods would help as well.
@wiesorix
@wiesorix 3 жыл бұрын
Alternative title: "Let's watch a black cube for seven minutes" Jokes aside, I think it's a great visiual representation, very insightful and satisfying to watch
@CarlosAM1
@CarlosAM1 3 жыл бұрын
Another issue after co2 is tackled (if it ever even is) is resource depletion. Oil and ore wont magically re appear on the earth and landfills wont magically get rid of trash, a circular economy is neccesary for this but making such a thing is way easier said than done, especially for electronics like this screen you are using right now. When this screen breaks it will probably end up in one of these landfills
@MrMoron-qn5rx
@MrMoron-qn5rx 2 жыл бұрын
Thats why being able to repair things is so good, cuz you can decrease your output
@CHKNSkratch
@CHKNSkratch 2 жыл бұрын
by the time co2 is tackled we'll have the tech to go asteroid mining.
@user-zn4pw5nk2v
@user-zn4pw5nk2v 2 жыл бұрын
@@CHKNSkratch if we wanted to fix it, it wouldn't be an issue(people are Happy with plastic, dirty electricity, lumber, (milk/meat), cars and concrete(and (freon argon) air-conditioning/refrigerants hair-stiffener and the like, breaking the ozone layer , until recently ~2000)(pretty much if you like it, it pollutes) plus politicians made it worst), the tech is as old as "global warming" , currently due to people not understanding simplifications climate change.
@edpiv2233
@edpiv2233 2 жыл бұрын
That has never been a problem in the past. Why would it be now? Literally tell me a resource we have depleted where we have not found a replacement?
@CHKNSkratch
@CHKNSkratch 2 жыл бұрын
@@edpiv2233 the problem is, renewables kind of ARE the replacement, and we need more of them. if oil and coal disappeared we'd be out of a surprisingly large amount of our energy.
@thomasbroderick5733
@thomasbroderick5733 3 жыл бұрын
This vid is great. It’s succinct, impactful, stylish, informative and most importantly true. Great work.
@aditi_05
@aditi_05 3 жыл бұрын
Big agree!
@PapaFlammy69
@PapaFlammy69 3 жыл бұрын
Keep up the great job Simon
@HolyG-sus
@HolyG-sus 3 жыл бұрын
Hey can we be friends?
@lessthan1446
@lessthan1446 2 жыл бұрын
@@rijsmiddel8765 elaboration isn’t needed it just is the undeniable truth
@lessthan1446
@lessthan1446 2 жыл бұрын
@@rijsmiddel8765 don’t question the truth
@addy7464
@addy7464 2 жыл бұрын
I am waiting for him to like your comment.
@edpiv2233
@edpiv2233 2 жыл бұрын
We are not adding carbon. We are adding c02. Additionally, throughout history the planet has had lots more c02, like the Jurassic period. Wonderfully healthy time w lots of cool stuff. We are going to be fine.
@AnymMusic
@AnymMusic 3 жыл бұрын
honestly for that meat I think so so SO many people forget that you don't need to cut out meat all together. just lowering meat consumption to 3/4 times a week would already help a lot for that sector
@marinaemi9029
@marinaemi9029 3 жыл бұрын
Ughhhh This makes me so hopeful and hopeless at the same time!!
@seasesh4073
@seasesh4073 2 жыл бұрын
You're not alone, I'm at this point where I'm so fed up with us humans, if we manage to reach that threshold and kill ourselve si won't even be mad
@farahabuhmaidan4302
@farahabuhmaidan4302 3 жыл бұрын
We need to get Simon to 1 Mil subscribers, it boggles me how we're not there yet. The quality of the content is insane!
@ddharsh2548
@ddharsh2548 3 жыл бұрын
Wow using the graphic was soo helpful to visualize what exactly is happening in our atmosphere!!!! Thank you so much :)
@andyhartley
@andyhartley 3 жыл бұрын
My flat is connected to a community heat network. There's no gas boiler in the property, in fact there's no gas supply to the whole building. What there is though is an energy centre next door which right now has large gas boilers and the hot water is available to the area via highly insulated pipes, which on its own is better than everyone having their own gas combi boiler. In the next few years though this will be connected to a wider heat network that will use the waste heat from power stations and industry to heat water and send that to a huge number of homes in the borough. Once you can do this kind of thing again, Simon, you should come and see what's going on. I'm sure the scheme would be very happy to show you around it all. I'll drop you some information.
@BradyJohnston
@BradyJohnston 3 жыл бұрын
Fabulous work Simon! The Blender graphics look really great, and importantly, tie the whole story together very well :)
@wulf2121
@wulf2121 2 жыл бұрын
Its a nice way to clear up one of the biggest misconceptions thats often repeated by climate sceptics. Yes, human emmissions only are 5% of the flow of carbon into the atmosphere, the rest is natural, yet human emmissions are resposible for 100% of the raise in carbon content of the atmosphere.
@arahman56
@arahman56 Жыл бұрын
One thing missed here is that just switching to Electric cars only help a bit- you still have all the other issues outside the engine. You also need to promote efforts to REDUCE the number of cars on the roads, with more robust public transit, train, bike and pedestrian infrastructure. Plus we also need to redo zoning laws so people can have stores and other amenities within a short walking distance.
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 3 жыл бұрын
excellent break down Simon! love the x4 at 4:54 tho - I'm pretty sure you're ticking through the years slightly faster than that..!
@jessbuildstech
@jessbuildstech 3 жыл бұрын
Hands down the best video edit, it was so good!
@rennieamundsen778
@rennieamundsen778 3 жыл бұрын
The graphics were fabulous . This was a great video easy to understand. Keep up the great work !!!
@suokkos
@suokkos 3 жыл бұрын
A climate action committee just published a report. The cheapest and largest action was restoring our swamps. There are a lot draining for farming and forestry. Restoration would turn them back to carbon sinks. They cannot alone solve issue. Other big issues are fossil fuel heating, transport and metallurgy. Example solution include hydrogen steel process.
@Pranav-un2ek
@Pranav-un2ek 3 жыл бұрын
Just finished the book, it's very detailed p.s. can bill send over a microsoft shirt?
@amcaleer4931
@amcaleer4931 3 жыл бұрын
Great video Dr Simon! Such a clear and elegant explanation of factors that affect climate change and what we can do about it.
@sambarden1330
@sambarden1330 3 жыл бұрын
Nice vid simon, Really informative and well put together.
@kylehart8829
@kylehart8829 2 жыл бұрын
For sure the best way to reduce road traffic emissions is to get people on public transport and improve the supply/distribution chain, not to just make everything electric; technology can make a small dent but we need to address the total energy we spend on transportation instead of just shifting the source from gasoline to coal. The reason personnel traffic is such a huge polluter is because of how horribly inefficient it is to carry small groups of people in a single vehicle when we can carry hundreds at a time with public transit. Improving train infrastructure is also a huge deal for long-distance shipping because trains are vastly better than semi trucks at long-haul shipping. Trains to do cross-country shipment + semis for final distribution, more people on public transit, far less transport emissions. Expecting technological advancements to magically whisk away climate change is wishful thinking and is a guarantee that we'll be in very deep water (sometimes literally if you're a coastal resident) within our lifetimes.
@JeffCottonBWFC
@JeffCottonBWFC 3 жыл бұрын
Good work Simon, excellently researched and very handy visualisations!
@ColinPaterson295
@ColinPaterson295 3 жыл бұрын
Really interesting stuff Simon, I'd love to see a video on the whole life cost of batteries, I really don't know what the current state of play is.
@capt4in1
@capt4in1 3 жыл бұрын
Check out the channel "The Limiting Factor" if you're interested in batteries.
@sagichdirdochnicht4653
@sagichdirdochnicht4653 2 жыл бұрын
It's getting better, but they are still pretty horrible. Altough if Countries like the USA did finally start building a fucking public Transit System, and if those who allready got one halfway useable system improved upon it, we wouldn't have to worry about Batteries THAT much anymore. We could easily get rid off 80% of cars, if everyone could for their usual commutes just Walk, Bike, or hop on Public transit, and used Carsharing for those circumstances, were a car is neccesarry. I
@Maxcallaghanphysics
@Maxcallaghanphysics 3 жыл бұрын
Oh wow Simon has come a long way from his videos on how to pass an Oxford interview to collaborating with Bill Gates. Pixel girl must be proud. !!!!
@Superm00
@Superm00 3 жыл бұрын
Really Love The Visual Style!
@sotirios-efstathiosantonou1457
@sotirios-efstathiosantonou1457 3 жыл бұрын
Awesome visualizations! Great video as always!
@tadhgtwo
@tadhgtwo 3 жыл бұрын
Well done Simon. That was a brilliant presentation and very clear.
@edpiv2233
@edpiv2233 2 жыл бұрын
Other then the fact that we are not releasing carbon, what we are releasing is not black and that the earth has has much more c02 in its environment before and it was just fine.
@colossalnate156
@colossalnate156 2 жыл бұрын
@@edpiv2233 we are realeasing carbon, and you are right, its not black, its clear, like a gas, its black here so we can see it, C02 is, wait for it, Carbon Dioxide, which is a subset of carbon, and you are right, the earth has had more, but it can no longer hold the same amount, the ozone layer weakens over time, so we may have a 1 trillion ton limit now, but in the past it may have been 10x that
@zombies956
@zombies956 3 жыл бұрын
Idk what to comments so heres one for the algorithm
@wiesorix
@wiesorix 3 жыл бұрын
Long live the algorithm!
@miajar
@miajar 3 жыл бұрын
Same X-D
@reuireuiop0
@reuireuiop0 3 жыл бұрын
My algo is very nice to me, already looking forward to it coming up with this blonde model showing off her best bathing suit next Sunday morning :)
@JonasBergling
@JonasBergling 2 жыл бұрын
Carbon-neutral cement/concrete might actually be possible. Before I got this video served by the algorithm, I listened to an hour-long interview today with someone here in Sweden involved in planning the worlds first carbon-neutral cement plant, Heidelberg Cement's plant in Slite on Gotland after it's upgraded. It's currently producing around 75% of the cement used in Sweden and their plan actually seems feasible. It might even become carbon negative as they increasingly use biofuels and then carbon capture+sequestration.
@NetZeroTech
@NetZeroTech 2 жыл бұрын
Great animations. I'd be curious to know how did that. Thank you!
@MattTheSpratt
@MattTheSpratt 2 жыл бұрын
seeing the time to fill that box up lengthen and lengthen by decades at a time was pretty heartening
@MrTroutsdale
@MrTroutsdale 3 жыл бұрын
Hi simon, don't suppose you can do a video about the emissions of energy from waste? currently work on emissions testing and we do a lot of waste incinerators and have seen a lot of complaints about them, but looking at our test results the emissions are very low in comparison to other processes such as the burning of gas from land fill and the other issues of land fill. Would be interesting to see what you could research about waste incinerators and the other alternative processes.
@davehenryjones9969
@davehenryjones9969 3 жыл бұрын
V informative as always, loved it!!
@suhailmall98
@suhailmall98 3 жыл бұрын
Commenting because it's a very well-researched video with a creative spin that helps it be more intuitive and obviously took a lot of work
@aidanwansbrough7495
@aidanwansbrough7495 3 жыл бұрын
This has to be the best, most concise and well put together explanation of climate change I've seen, definitely recommending it! Thanks!
@kyotokitsune
@kyotokitsune 2 жыл бұрын
Wow, I use a similar analogy to your box with a faucet when I talk about climate change. Sweet.
@MrRustyB2
@MrRustyB2 3 жыл бұрын
That’s an awesome summary and I love that you overview so much of the bigger picture. However when it comes to agriculture maybe Bill Gates hadn’t considered what many farmers are adopting in “ regenerative agriculture” which reduces and can even eliminate fertilises pesticides herbicides etc and sequester carbon back into the soil, also opening up the opportunity for cattle farming with a negative carbon impact and even Carbon farming.
@The_fusion_physics_guy
@The_fusion_physics_guy 2 жыл бұрын
YES EXCELLENT POINT. However it turns out most of the fertilizer emissions mentioned are actually just from the energy cost of producing ammonia, which could be zero emission if they just used renewables to heat and pressurize the process. there are minimal emissions of nitrous oxide (in terms of way less than 1% of greenhouse gasses worldwide), but those are negligible in comparison.
@mikediessner6063
@mikediessner6063 3 жыл бұрын
Great quality, Simon!
@KC_G4S
@KC_G4S 3 жыл бұрын
Great video! One thing I would point out though, and that is I guess the only silver lining to climate change, is that with enough green energy production, carbon recapture could increase as power becomes cheaper. This would mean that other industries that will take longer to go green due to inherent limitations, will be allotted more time to do so. Of course, this does not mean those industries should get a pass, they still need to go green, but carbon recapture buys them time for the green technology to mature and become affordable or profitable.
@The_fusion_physics_guy
@The_fusion_physics_guy 2 жыл бұрын
Ha, he said carbon capture, funny man You know what, i'm honestly cool with this, as long as each and every industry that keeps emitting carbon foots the ENTIRE capture bill for their own emissions. I'll bet exon wouldn't be as gung-ho about their cc&s research adds if they were actually having to foot the bill for the mythical operation of their mythical technology.
@AliSot2000
@AliSot2000 3 жыл бұрын
What a nice visualisation. Superb video m8.
@Theres_No_PlanetB
@Theres_No_PlanetB 3 жыл бұрын
Awesome, those animations!
@adwerte
@adwerte 3 жыл бұрын
I think it would be cool to see the flows from each category to compare their size!
@ollieb8738
@ollieb8738 3 жыл бұрын
Great video, although I would have liked to see a discussion of pedestrianization in regard to how we can decrease emissions from transportation.
@ollieb8738
@ollieb8738 3 жыл бұрын
​@@professorfrog7181 Good point! I'm from Canada, I forget how much better the rest of the world has it sometimes
@lesussie2237
@lesussie2237 2 жыл бұрын
yesss. people also seem to forget that public transport like trains are already electrified, and for those that arent, they simply dont need to (like bikes) or just need a bit of modification to (like busses)
@carlosbornes
@carlosbornes 3 жыл бұрын
Really cool video Simon well done 👌
@TheDudleyReport
@TheDudleyReport 3 жыл бұрын
Great video, the visualisations made your points very clear. It would have been interesting to see/hear about how we can also sequester more carbon too. You briefly mentioned natural processes such as acid rain, but can we also amplify our ability to sequester carbon in addition to our carbon emitting reductions? How big an impact could that have? I watched a great film a couple of years ago called '2040' which described a seaweed that can be grown that is very effective at sequestering carbon. Surely if we're to effectively fight the effects of climate change we need to both reduce emissions and take more carbon out of our atmosphere too.
@thatnongayfurry5063
@thatnongayfurry5063 2 жыл бұрын
Going to be pretty hard to reduce carbon emissions for countries like America and China, also in my country the most used fertilizer is natural, or in other words cow poop and replacing synthetic fertilizers with it wouldn't be that hard atleast I don't think it would be.
@piotrd.4850
@piotrd.4850 2 жыл бұрын
5:40 There are NO market forces incentivising electric cars - there are unreasonable fiscal and legal pressure to buy overly expensive, environmentally heavy NEW cars.
@destesful
@destesful 3 жыл бұрын
Very informative, thanks for the great video!
@jananias2985
@jananias2985 3 жыл бұрын
This is cool. Renewables are the way to go! However it doesn't solve the social issues that pervade the energy industry. Whose land gets taken for solar/wind farms? Whose water supply is going to get cut off due to dams built for hydroelectric power? Who's going to face the landslides and floods because of the dams? These are tough questions that we need to answer immediately, otherwise we might end up creating more inequality. I'm from a country where socially, the field is uneven to say the least. I kind of feel helpless at the face of the climate crisis, because running into renewables haphazardly will make those inequalities more stark, but we also need to act now. IDK, just a thought. (edit: grammar)
@FlubbedBunion
@FlubbedBunion 3 жыл бұрын
Amazing work Simon
@cameronparkinson8580
@cameronparkinson8580 3 жыл бұрын
Great video, thanks Simon
@jacobblackshaw3060
@jacobblackshaw3060 3 жыл бұрын
Great video Simon
@xDanoss318x
@xDanoss318x 3 жыл бұрын
Great video Simon, loved it. Conservation agriculture will play a big part in creating carbon sinks (Soil) and reducing the emissions of agriculture. I am giving my best to make a change in this sector. Reducing meat + Conservation agriculture will hopefully make a big difference in the future!
@The_fusion_physics_guy
@The_fusion_physics_guy 2 жыл бұрын
Conservation agriculture is awesome, love to see the plug!!! re-carbonizing over-plowed soil is an awesome approach to farming that not only captures carbon, it increases the water absorption capabilities of the soil and prevents erosion, why is it not the norm =D
@user-xg5dw2gm8f
@user-xg5dw2gm8f 3 жыл бұрын
2:20 CURRENTly?
@SimonClark
@SimonClark 3 жыл бұрын
👉😎👉
@aameerbhamani3915
@aameerbhamani3915 3 жыл бұрын
Video quality on another level!
@Olo_211
@Olo_211 3 жыл бұрын
can you make a vid on spacex or nasa , current problems in technology etc
@jadoei13
@jadoei13 3 жыл бұрын
I keep hearing people say we'll simply run out of resources we use to make batteries, solar panels and windmills while trying to achieve net zero emissions. While I find it a bit hard to believe that there are no ways around the issues we face, I also don't know enough about it to at least have an idea of what's going on. I'd like to do all the research necessary to figure this out on my own, but I currently don't have the time. Are there any good sources or would it be possible to make a video on the topic?
@alexh7140
@alexh7140 3 жыл бұрын
we wont, batteries use lithium and iron the two most common elements on the planet.
@jadoei13
@jadoei13 3 жыл бұрын
@@professorfrog7181 They are actually, they just think the planet can't sustain our current population
@alexh7140
@alexh7140 3 жыл бұрын
@@professorfrog7181 yes it is, it's an obvious reason why, however I would also say that oil and gas will run out in around fifty years so we can't pollute through these methods, I'm not sure whether this visualisation accounts for that
@melbournewolf
@melbournewolf 2 жыл бұрын
thx for the great analysis and reasons to act, NOW! btw, you look like a recent friend
@wtelpwte4594
@wtelpwte4594 2 жыл бұрын
We have known of global warming for nearly 50 yyear and yet haven't done much. Hopefully the newer generations will be able to save mankind and our planet.
@AlexLectures
@AlexLectures 2 жыл бұрын
Awesome video, Simon!
@YarinM
@YarinM 3 жыл бұрын
Can you please do a video about carbon capturing technologies like genetic engineered trees that produce more O_2 from CO_2?
@reuireuiop0
@reuireuiop0 3 жыл бұрын
Trees for carbon capture n don't work. First, every quarter century, fools like Trump or Bolsanero come along & allow their cronies to cut down what you've planted. See what's done to Bialowiecsa Forest, Poland by the PiS government. Woods are on fertile soil, timber is value, even stabile govt can't keep it safe- even swedish old growth is dwindling. How do even expect to check on protection of far off forests in out of the way corrupt countries ? More important, there's simply not enough open land to plant them co2 Capture trees. Farm folk live there, if not, it's already forest or it's unfertile or too dry. Greenpeace calculated about 2 times the surface of india is needed for current offset schemes using trees. We don't have that kind of empty land surface. We need something more durable. I'd go for seeding ocean plankton, the oceans contain about 60 times the 1880 atmosphere carbon content, or 16 times the total biosphere content including soils. It might affect ocean ecosystems - but as long we're not living in there, we could probably survive with that.
@miajar
@miajar 3 жыл бұрын
Great video, illustrates the climate challenge very good
@itdful
@itdful 2 жыл бұрын
I feel as though it's important to note, 1 trillion tonnes of carbon emissions is not 1 trillion tonnes of burned fossil fuels. You get more greenhouse emissions then you have fossil fuels... Kinda scary stuff to think about.
@miguelribeiro5165
@miguelribeiro5165 3 жыл бұрын
This is good science communication! We need more people to see this. Share wherever you can, we are all in the same boat.
@emilyarmstrong9734
@emilyarmstrong9734 3 жыл бұрын
So this is pretty random, but could you possibly do a video (or have you already done a video) about how 2 degrees Celsius is a big deal? My dad doesn’t believe the climate crisis cuz he saw the figure of the global average climate only raising 2 degrees and just wrote that off as a natural thing and it really annoys me. Thanks :) love the visualization here
@august1871
@august1871 3 жыл бұрын
I've thought about this also, and a clear way to understand why such a (seemingly) small number translates to such dramatic negative impact on modern life would be very helpful for many!
@harryiii3361
@harryiii3361 2 жыл бұрын
​@@august1871 It's also true that the 2 degrees number doesn't translate to 2 degrees everywhere. Certain regions will see much a higher increase than that, others won't see a huge difference in local temperatures. Apart from the changing climate due to the changing heat distributions and extreme weather events from that, the places that are likely to see significant temperature increases already have summers that approach the upper limits of what humans can withstand naturally. It could render regions that are uninhabitable during certain times of the year
@chrisconklin2981
@chrisconklin2981 2 жыл бұрын
I live in north Florida and because the night time temperature are in the low 70's(F), I am able to cool the house with fans at night. But not this year. Across our nation, night time temperature are up. I also hear that winters are getting colder. Heating and cooling will become more important.
@walterpost9073
@walterpost9073 3 жыл бұрын
There are two other interesting books, „2084„ by James Lawrence Powell and „The new climate war“ by Michael E. Mann. How about a review for these?
@rike2522
@rike2522 3 жыл бұрын
2084 by jostein gaarder also
@muffigaming2787
@muffigaming2787 2 жыл бұрын
I just want to put a small correction to the steel production point: It isnt completely true that it absolutely required to produce CO2 in making steel. For example Salzgitter AG (a german steel producer) has their SALCOS project in which they build plants for direct hydrogen reduction of metal. (Not sure for which metals it works, though) You might not get that value to 0 but there is still a lot of room for reducing those emissions as well. Some kind of carbon capture is still necessary, though.
@seraphina985
@seraphina985 2 жыл бұрын
You might find this interesting it discusses some of the metals it can work with www.researchgate.net/publication/225575276_Hydrogen_as_a_reducing_agent_State-of-the-art_science_and_technology
@muffigaming2787
@muffigaming2787 2 жыл бұрын
​@@seraphina985 Thanks for that. I only knew about these projects because I applied for an internship at Salzgitter AG. But this is quite interesting, really.
@Albot940
@Albot940 3 жыл бұрын
Great video! I just thought I'd add that steel production and fertiliser can be decarbonised with green hydrogen - carbon offsets not necessarily required.
@rike2522
@rike2522 3 жыл бұрын
You have sources to share?
@kevinmarrs3372
@kevinmarrs3372 3 жыл бұрын
How would you use hydrogen in steel production? Normally iron ore is mixed with coal in a furnace to produce iron for the steel.
@Albot940
@Albot940 3 жыл бұрын
@@kevinmarrs3372 hydrogen can accomplish the same thing as coal through reducing iron ore to create water, instead of CO2 like the reaction with coking coal does. This is not done currently because it obviously costs more for the hydrogen then coal, but there are quite a few pilot plants and trials starting up. You obviously still need a bit of carbon for the chemical composition of the steel, but you're not emitting CO2.
@Albot940
@Albot940 3 жыл бұрын
@@rike2522 not really, it's an easy Google search. If you look up "hydrogen steel production" or "hydrogen fertiliser production" you will get hundreds of news articles and academic papers.
@kevinmarrs3372
@kevinmarrs3372 3 жыл бұрын
@@Albot940 i would imagine you’d have to redesign the reactor completely since you’re now using a gaseous reactant instead of purely solids but I guess it could be done theoretically. Question is how will the processes compare in difficulty and cost.
@JoshuaBarretto
@JoshuaBarretto 3 жыл бұрын
5:24 says "this is a good thing" regarding 3/4 being from cars and trucks. Counterpoint: it's a bad thing, and the fact that it's this high is a form of survivorship bias, since it's basically a list of things that we've so far been unable to decarbonise. 50 years ago, trains would have been high up on that list, but moving trains to renewables has been trivial when compared to cars, and so they no longer feature on that list.
@boathemian7694
@boathemian7694 3 жыл бұрын
I’m not sure what your day job is Simon but you are an excellent science educator.
@obrod7080
@obrod7080 3 жыл бұрын
Where can I find your discord?!
@nacho6438
@nacho6438 3 жыл бұрын
This was so informative but more importantly, straight to the point which is enough to keep my hummingbird attention span gripped
@AdvaitDhingra
@AdvaitDhingra 3 жыл бұрын
Very nice video. I really enjoyed it.
@NecromanSir
@NecromanSir 2 жыл бұрын
Hey man, we do have an alternative to synthetic fertilizers, in fact we can switch the current practices to regenerative ones quite easily. The agriculture industry is not only about carbon you know, there are much more to that like biodiversity loss and desertification.
@ethan-loves
@ethan-loves 3 жыл бұрын
Very well done with this video!
@simaojd1062
@simaojd1062 3 жыл бұрын
It would be awesome if you could make a video about solar storms
@liasonlee1248
@liasonlee1248 2 жыл бұрын
For the transport part, socializing housing is also a way to cut traveling to work significantly, with people staying closer to workplaces and more amenities available for the centralized housing network, there is no need to travel and waste resources getting from one place to the other just to do meager tasks.
@PTSxVipErZz
@PTSxVipErZz 3 жыл бұрын
Super cool video, really enjoyed it
@cyborgbob1017
@cyborgbob1017 2 жыл бұрын
One of the arguments I get against electric vehicles is that: "You're just ignoring the problem. Most of the energy that powers your car still comes from coal; and the lithium mines that build the batteries for your car do more damage to the Earth than gas cars ever do." While that is a fair point, it's important to consider that EV's are NOT the solution, but merely a stepping stone guiding us towards the solution. If we have gas cars, not only are we burning coal to fuel the car up, we are also burning coal to power the batteries. If we move towards EV's, we wipe out the emissions coming from fueling the car itself, so we can focus on removing the emissions from where we get our energy, and actually start moving towards better energy solutions like nuclear, renewables, and from space itself. As for the lithium problem, we can likely get those materials from our asteroids, or other planets; depending on where its found
@piotrarturklos
@piotrarturklos 3 жыл бұрын
This is a very important perspective, because not many people know about the impact of construction or fertilizers. And of course the governments don't care when people don't.
@sevearka
@sevearka 3 жыл бұрын
Great video! More people should watch you :)
@francescadakin8471
@francescadakin8471 3 жыл бұрын
Great video!
@mrradman2986
@mrradman2986 2 жыл бұрын
Fun fact, at the end of the last ice age atmospheric C02 was so low at less than 200 ppm it was perilously close to causing mass extinction of plants which would have been catastrophic for life on Earth.
@bluesbr0ther588
@bluesbr0ther588 2 жыл бұрын
Fun fact, the end of the last ice age was 260 million years ago.
@mrradman2986
@mrradman2986 2 жыл бұрын
@@bluesbr0ther588 Er, it was actually 10 000 years ago. Oops.
@bluesbr0ther588
@bluesbr0ther588 2 жыл бұрын
@@mrradman2986 No that was a glacial period. We are still in that ice age. If you want to discuss climate change then the least you can do is learn the proper terms.
@mrradman2986
@mrradman2986 2 жыл бұрын
@@bluesbr0ther588 Doh! it was 10 000 years ago when the great glaciers extended into the southern US and southern UK. By any manner of means it was what everyone understands as an ice age, the age of glaciation. We are now in an interglacial and hence in all probability will go back into another age of glaciation otherwise known as an ice age. C02 when the last glaciation ended was around 180ppm. Plants die at around 150 ppm. You guys specialise in talking patronising nonsense.
@bluesbr0ther588
@bluesbr0ther588 2 жыл бұрын
@@mrradman2986 All i ask is that you remain factual. If you consider that patronising then perhaps you should remain factual to avoid those kinds of comments in the future.
@richardallan2767
@richardallan2767 2 жыл бұрын
If only there was some way we could voluntarily, over a few generations, reduce the net amount of emissions we require.
@kalpanarohitnain7938
@kalpanarohitnain7938 3 жыл бұрын
Hey, Hi Simon Clark! Best wishes from India to you ❤❤✌🏻❤❤
@jsph6
@jsph6 3 жыл бұрын
10/10 Video Simon 👍
@kylehart8829
@kylehart8829 2 жыл бұрын
Decreasing meat and dairy consumption would definitely not decrease carbon emissions meaningfully, and meat consumption is crucial for feeding people and not wasting otherwise unusable farmland where only grass can grow. Removing cows from existence would help hypothetically, but we don't really have many more cows here now compared to buffalo/bison populations naturally living in the US, and many other countries are a very similar story. Calling livestock a significant anthropogenic source of CO2 is pretty naive considering that there were basically just as many animals here before european settlers came. Meat consumption is crucial if we intend on feeding the whole world, seeing as how most land in most countries cannot be used to farm edible grains. We absolutely can reduce methane emissions from beef, however, and since methane can be a relevant emission depending on local environmental factors it's definitely a meaningful metric to decrease.
@kayakrun023
@kayakrun023 3 жыл бұрын
I wondered what those animations were for.
@Hbchnhdfjjjas5483
@Hbchnhdfjjjas5483 3 жыл бұрын
Amazing way to explain
@marchclem3688
@marchclem3688 3 жыл бұрын
Nice! I love your videos but daaaamn.. always a life crisis. I'm gonna go back to bed and cry
@MiniLifeCrisis
@MiniLifeCrisis Жыл бұрын
Another great video however I have to disagree with you about fertiliser, a growing proportion of farmers are now using no dig or no till farming methods which includes keeping all waste/weeds on the land therefore reducing the need for fertlisers.
@LongFacedBastard
@LongFacedBastard 3 жыл бұрын
I can't imagine why a video coproduced by Bill Gates wouldn't touch on the problem that our current economic system not only encourages but requires endless growth to operate. I couldn't imagine a conflict in interest here
@xway2
@xway2 3 жыл бұрын
Even if we were to agree that ending capitalism would be beneficial, it is also completely unrealistic. You could choose to put all your energy into that goal, convincing people and fighting and whatnot, but do you actually think you'll do it before 2050, and with enough time left to then impose the necessary changes? Obviously I don't agree that it's even a good idea to begin with, but my point is that even if I did, I would still not push for it because it's not likely to succeed in time. You could draw a comparison to nuclear power, which I still think would be a great way to lower our emissions. Sadly, it's also a no-go because of politics, so I choose to focus on other goals instead.
@starshipx1282
@starshipx1282 3 жыл бұрын
Nice job Dr Clark.
@Pranav-un2ek
@Pranav-un2ek 3 жыл бұрын
See Simon, even Elon believes in you
@samuelbailey7839
@samuelbailey7839 2 жыл бұрын
Excellent content as always. However, the agriculture sector has a bit of a catch-22 to deal with if it needs both to eliminate animal farming and to find a mostly green source of fertiliser (synthetic fertiliser has an even bigger footprint than animal waste and accounts globally for roughly half of the supply of fertiliser), while using arable land sustainably.
@thelight6496
@thelight6496 3 жыл бұрын
I would like more of this
@moimitou
@moimitou 3 жыл бұрын
Great vid!
@warden-sisyphus5554
@warden-sisyphus5554 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for acknowledging Nuclear Power! I'm not against alternatives either, we just REALLY need to move beyond the Nuclear Power stigma. The technology has been improved and refined massively, there is incredible positive potential with Nuclear.
@seraphina985
@seraphina985 2 жыл бұрын
It is a shame that he failed to point out this is ultimately probably the only way to really decarbonise global shipping too. Modern container ships are more than large enough to house a small nuclear reactor and all its shielding. Also most of the increased operational costs that make them less attractive are not only offset by higher speed and thus more revenue. But they also mostly stem from there being all of one civilian facility suitably equipped and staffed facility to maintain a nuclear vessel in the world. This is a problem that would go away with the help of some initial subsidies to nudge new ship construction in that direction. Since that would create the incentive for facilities to invest in being able to capture the market for maintaining these new vessels.
@Micz84
@Micz84 2 жыл бұрын
If we manage to buy 100 years it will be huge. Progress in technology will help us buy more in te future. Look where we were 100 houndred years ago. Cars were a thing of the future, most people did not have access to eletricity. Imagine how our life will look in another houndred years assuming we will survive :P.
@soyokou.2810
@soyokou.2810 3 жыл бұрын
Helping the algorithm push this video along.
The surprising bias in climate satellites (and models)
16:42
Simon Clark
Рет қаралды 81 М.
YouTube's surprising carbon footprint
14:18
Simon Clark
Рет қаралды 29 М.
ELE QUEBROU A TAÇA DE FUTEBOL
00:45
Matheus Kriwat
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
Glow Stick Secret 😱 #shorts
00:37
Mr DegrEE
Рет қаралды 141 МЛН
Be kind🤝
00:22
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
Three months ago you changed my life
13:29
Simon Clark
Рет қаралды 38 М.
California's Renewable Energy Problem
18:01
Real Engineering
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН
What's it like doing a PhD at CERN?
25:47
Simon Clark
Рет қаралды 260 М.
11 Unsolved Problems in Climate Change
27:36
Simon Clark
Рет қаралды 59 М.
Carl Sagan testifying before Congress in 1985 on climate change
16:54
carlsagandotcom
Рет қаралды 3,2 МЛН
The bias problem with climate satellites
16:34
Simon Clark
Рет қаралды 36 М.
#TeamSeas - a force for good?
10:35
Simon Clark
Рет қаралды 130 М.
Why TeamSeas Doesn't Work: Their Interceptors
21:02
Simon Clark
Рет қаралды 595 М.
My polar vortex PhD thesis: explained
19:12
Simon Clark
Рет қаралды 111 М.
Is there any good news about climate change?
11:11
Simon Clark
Рет қаралды 506 М.
ПК с Авито за 3000р
0:58
ЖЕЛЕЗНЫЙ КОРОЛЬ
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
Что еще за Smartisan?
0:49
Не шарю!
Рет қаралды 111 М.
#miniphone
0:18
Miniphone
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
Fiber kablo
0:15
Elektrik-Elektronik
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН