No me doing a video saying Man Utd are BACK 10 minutes after losing 7-0 to Liverpool is the most Vizeh thing ever

Nah bro Sheffield United just lost to Newcastle eight nil

​@@Vizeh you should make a side channel called heziv lol

Hehe the odds were in his favor

No way did vizeh just give 15 percent off and chelsea are sitting a point above 15th haha

100%

Going absolutely mental with both buying and selling players in the way Chelsea have been doing is just so unsustainable. The two reasons why Man United were so successful under Ferguson was because they'd refresh the team every season to keep the squad from aging too much and they went for the right sort of players. That helps maintain chemistry within the squad and the style of football the manager wants to play. Going out and buying essentially two whole squads of nothing but kids/young adults and immediately putting them on ludicrous contracts is literally begging for disaster.

They should have made signings more gradually and signed 2 or 3 per window to give the squad chance to gel together

@@Vizeh Chelsea signed 12 players this summer, some of whom have been sent out on loan. In the summer of 2003 when Abramovich arrived Chelsea signed 13 players that summer. They signed more in the following January & then even more in the next summer. And none of those signings were sent out on loan. What's more, the previous season Chelsea had finished 4th in the Prem & were in the CL. Whereas the previous season to this summer's addition of 12 new players, Chelsea finished 12th in the Prem & will not have CL this season. Therefore you COULD argue there was more reason & more justification for the current owners overhauling the squad than there was for Abramovich to do so.

@@theredguy8746 There has been no suggestion & no indication that the owners of Chelsea want to or plan to sustain player turnover in the way we've seen in their first year. Putting them on ludicrous contracts? Not at all, in fact on the contrary. The new owners at Chelsea have reduced the club's annual wage bill from £226m to £128m. That's a £100m reduction in just one year. There are now only two players earning over £200k per week & only one player earning over £300k per week. They're anything but ludicrous contracts, they are now putting players on much more sensible contracts.

Apparently tuchel was only sacked because he and Boehly were on bad terms

Great comment mate!

I aint reading allat (maybe i will)

Poch aint elite? How can you explain THAT champions league run by spurs?

TT is also the manager who sold every striker possible

I do wonder how'd they'd do with Tuchel now if he stayed

At least he not only got to those finals, but kept a clean sheet in both games minus the shootouts despite losing them. Both finals ended up being 0-0 draws going to penalties

Like sure they had lost to an eventually relegated Leeds and Southampton before Tuchel was sacked but the previous game was a competitive draw with spurs, and Tuchel was forced to have a greater hand in transfers with the departure of Petr Cech and Granovskaia it was lunacy

I’ll never forgive Tuchel and Kai Havertz for that Club World Cup personally 🤣

@@Vizehprobably 3rd and getting to the semis, where they win against Madrid, signing some quality players

Got rid of Thomas way before the happened

And the irony of it? President Putin and Abramovich were never friends. Quite the opposite.

You’re not wrong that it’s a factor, kind of crazy to think that a war has led to the demise to Chelsea in a way

@@Vizeh Yeah. Chelsea used to do better business under him, too. Occasionally they would blow money on useless players (i.e. Morata) but not nearly as much as under Boehly.

i also believe that they're nuying mudryk is because they had to keep it cool with ukraine because of their history with abramovich and russian money

I did a tweet last month saying no one in there team will get 10 Prem Goals this year and got lit up, i'm going to be right

@@Vizeh Ik this is a joke but naah they arent getting anything more than 40

Nah because it’ll be a Reece James hat trick from the hospital bed

​@@Vizeh I have faith in Nkuku the guy looks clinical and that is what the other players lack, its not chance creation.

Not very good either. They have spent so much on midfield but don't have a half decent creator.

That's fair

Scammed them lol

Yet still spend 100 million for a caicedo

​@@easto1633*115 million

Havertz is contributing more than Mudryk

Quality quote

Remember saying this and got absolutely pelters for it too😂

Which players ? I’m Sure most Chelsea fans wanted them all since last season

@@Sjtoolsie I get that feeling mainly from caicedo and mudryk due to how they entered negotiations in the last minute. It wouldn't be their first time. I remember back in 2013 mourinho said that he bought demba ba because he simply did not want arsenal buying him.

@@hbfb1123 Chelsea had been working on the Caicedo transfer since the early summer. And they had been interested in Lavia ever since Southampton declined their £50m bid for him the previous summer.

​@@hbfb1123you really know nothing, how to was Caicedo a last minute signing? We've been trying to sign him all year

100%

i think clear lakes theoretical strategy was akin to that of a startups “move fast, break things” - unfortunately it has backfired beyond their understanding

@@Adrian-bx4ue i think you might be right, I mean it's clear that Boehly has a good business brain, but he came into this role knowing nothing about football, the strategy has been a disaster from the beginning, I recently told a few Chelsea fans "enjoy mid table" I have a feeling that'll be the new normal for a while

Fifa ultimate player viewpoint lol. The actual reality is they don't have a clear playing philosophy. Get a formation and buy players from clubs who play it ie sassuolo barca ajax etc etc

@@Micfri300 imo the problem isn't leadership or formation rn. With this team we should be able to beat the game we have been playing. The problem is that we can't score. The midfield and defense is solid and it's now getting thrown under the bus cuz we can't score

The Chelsea way is complete chaos 100%

It is almost as if the players are protesting something, I wonder what

But once again this is another inaccurate account of what actually happened. The timeline proves it. The new owners didn't make a load of changes BEFORE the season started. Chelsea's poor season was already underway BEFORE many of the changes happened. Tuchel wasn't sacked because of anything to do with poor results or the poor start to the season. He was sacked because the manager & the owners couldn't come to an agreement on what the owners wanted the manager's role to be as the club went forward. It wasn't really a sacking as such, it was a mutual parting of the ways. But technically it was a sacking & this was because doing in this way was financially beneficial for Tuchel (& much less problematic for the club). The overhauling of the medical dept & various other areas of the club also didn't happen until well after the season had started. Prior to the start of the 2022/23 season the new owners had only signed 5 new players for the first team plus a 6th player on loan. They literally had no choice but to sign these players. It wasn't Todd Boehly's fault that Rudiger & Christensen had both chosen to decline a new contract & instead run their existing contract down to become free transfers. Rudiger wanted to go to Real Madrid & Christensen wanted to go to Barcelona. Alonso wanted to leave because Barcelona wanted him & Emerson wanted to leave because he rarely got any game time at Chelsea. The Lukaku signing had been a total disaster (nothing to do with the new owners) & all parties wanted him out of the club. Timo Werner was wanted back by RB Leipzig & it wasn't a surprise to anybody that he left Chelsea. And the things I've laid out above is the extent of the goings-on in the summer before Chelsea's poor 2022/23 season. What is there out of all the events I've mentioned that came about as a result of anything Boehly or the owners did?

It sounds as if you're blaming Boehly & the owners for doing something wrong in regard to Reece James, Mount, Hudson-Odoi, Gilmour, Rudiger, Kante, Azpi. What is it exactly that the new owners did or didn't do in regard to any of the players you've named that was wrong or was a mistake? James was given a new 6 yr contract by Boehly. Gilmour was sold before Boehly bought the club. Mount was repeatedly offered a new contract by the previous regime & by the new regime. He chose to leave Chelsea. Hudson-Odoi hasn't shown he merits a place in the first team. Chelsea have been extremely patient with him, they even turned down a £50m offer for him from Bayern Munich a few years ago. Rudiger wanted Real Madrid & so wouldn't sign a new contract. Kante was incredibly injury prone & he was on £325k per week. Azpi was very tempted to leave Chelsea 12 months before he actually did. He only agreed to stay another 12 months because Todd Boehly asked him to. So what players did you expect would never leave Chelsea?

Wish you well, thankfully there’s no chance on this planet Chelsea are going down haha

Modern football

@dookiewookie7571 Buy tickets? I'd put money on it that you've NEVER bought a single ticket for a Chelsea match.

This is like a blackburn rovers type of crumble, Chelsea will forever find themselves either at the bottom of premier league or play at Championship start from now trust me

@@yanyeouleong7922 When a club has the kind of resources & financial backing that Chelsea does then you won't even see an Arsenal type of crumble, let alone Blackburn.

You say Boehly has not taken a patient approach, well neither did Abramovich, the important point is, Abramovich understood football and surrounded himself with knowledgeable staff and even with frequent managerial changes always stayed focused on the end result. What we have now is a man with no direction, nor understanding of football nor apparently any backroom knowledge , it is a recipe for disaster and that is what is unfolding before us

The Chelsea way in a sense is to kind of always be in some sort of chaos, criticized for sacking managers very often but always brought success

I aint reading allat

@tobaepebinuade5830 You are doing what I see so many people on here do, make an assumption that you know everything & that if you don't know about something then it's because it doesn't exist. Because YOU don't understand what Chelsea are doing, because YOU don't know anything about the long term project Chelsea are implementing, you automatically assume there is no project, there are no plans. There is a clearly defined & very comprehensive long term (10yrs) project at Chelsea. It is titled "Vision 2030". The head architect of Vision 2030 was Neil Bath, a 30 year employee of Chelsea. Neil Bath is also the man who since 2011 was the No.1 head man at the Chelsea academy & more than anyone else has been responsible for developing the country's leading academy at Chelsea. It was primarily his 'project' that led to Chelsea having the most successful academy & youth production line of any club in England. And for a certain period of time it was recognised as the leading academy in Europe. What you also won't know is how Vision 2030 didn't come about under the new ownership, it originated when Abramovich was still in control. The first 7 year contract a player signed was under Abramovich. And finally....when the club was being sold, one of the conditions that Abramovich was insistent on was that the new owners give a commitment to continue with the implementation of Vision 2030.

@@jameswiglesworth5004 This is just more nonsense & uninformed drivel. You just make stuff up to fit what you wanna say. No, Abramovich did not have much understanding of football in 2003 & we know this because he said so in one of the only two interviews he ever gave. He literally said "I don't know anything about football in England". He had only just watched the first football match in his life (a CL Real Madrid game). And unlike Todd Boehly, Abramovich couldn't speak English. And unlike Todd Boehly, Abramovich had never even done ANY sort of business in the UK prior to 2003. "Abramovich surrounded himself with knowledgeable staff"..?? Who? Name these people? The truth of the matter is you haven't got a clue who Abramovich took advice from when he arrived at Chelsea, not a clue. It's simply unreal how clowns like you think you have anything to teach someone like Todd Boehly or Behdad Eghbali. Your brain doesn't operate on the same level. Todd Boehly is estimated to be worth $5.5b. He made his multi-billion dollar wealth from being extremely smart & from making shrewd decisions in business. People like Boehly & Eghbali make their billions because they know exactly what they are doing & because they know how to be successful. These people simply don't invest huge sums into ventures they can't make successful. Huge investment corporations like Clearlake, & the other investors, don't do things recklessly. You're saying that the other investors would sit back & watch another investor such as Boehly act in a way that would be damaging to their expensive asset?

When you have idiots at the club then yes that is what happens sadly

Idiots is too harsh of a word concedering that to be a billionare u sre likley not a idiot tho understans ur point @Vizeh

And just before having won the champions league

And yet they complaining About city who spend less than utd and chelsea lmao

@@skullxishim no.... no they're idiots. They can be intelligent in another field (one where they actually made their money...) sure, but that doesn't make them intelligent when it comes to the sport of football

Thank you man!

This is my biggest issue as a United fan. We're constantly spending money, but we don't have much to show for it. And what's worse is that we always seem to be tied to every single large/on the rise player that we might as well be Nottingham Forest at this point. And don't get me started on the mess that is the executive board

Got to do it wisely

Chelsea was spending money and having success until the ownership change

@@ebnest123 abramovich knew how to spend money usually they did have duds under him sure but he often was an expert in good signings

Problem is that Nkuku is out and he was the main reason they looked better. He is a clinical striker, someting they didnt have and curently dont have.

The preseason tactics were completely different

Thank you man

Thank you my friend!❤

They deserve an All or Nothing Amazon documentary.

What, do you think this is Arsenal or Liverpool we're talking about? We're talking about Chelsea & unlike others we don't have long spells away from the top anymore.

That seemed reasonable, I thought they would be 6th as surely it can't be as bad as last year

Literally every single pundit predicted table/ youtuber predicted table had chelsea top 7, with my team brighton falling to 10th etc. People had honestly been fooled by another window of mass buying with no real chemistry between any of the players and expected immediate results. Long live the chelsea way 😂

Thank you mate!

That final from 2013 still hurts i'm guessing

@@Vizeh and their conduct on the Enzo situation. our CL run could have been very different. but yes, mostly that EL final.

Fleeced a lot of money out of them at least

@@gajoaleatoriowe paid what you wanted?

​@@gajoaleatorioBenfica pulled down Chelsea and Todd Boehly's pants with the Enzo transfer. Why are you complaining?

You are aware of how the new owners at Chelsea have just spent more money in one year, & in 3 consecutive transfer windows, than Abramovich ever spent? They've recently smashed the British transfer record, twice. As strange as it sounds but if Abramovich was still the owner then they wouldn't have spent anywhere near as much in the past year. It also helps you be successful when you have bigger revenue year after year than most of your rivals do.

@@danniwilder2198 didn't ask, don't care, Chelsea are back to being shit again, stay mad lmao

@@unpoppablebubble If Chelsea were shit then they'd be like Liverpool or Arsenal or Spurs or Utd when they are shit & go away for 5 or 6 years at a time. Let's see if Chelsea are not a top 4 club for as long as the other clubs I mentioned sometimes go not being a top 4 club.

@@danniwilder2198 lol

Did you miss the intro? They've spent 1 Billion and still are awful 😂 so their success being built on spending lots of 💰 money is not the issue here.

He bought Sterling and Sterling is one of the worse players

@@Sjtoolsie is he really though or is he one of those that have suffered cause of the clubs lack of direction

Bissouma been at Spurs for 2 years now and has had one spell of 5 decent games…

Think about how much the agents will be getting based on these deals too

Don't you think at some point these young players will want to earn more & be paid the really big wages at the top end of the game? And we don't see many players wanting to milk 5 year contracts, so why would they want to milk 8 year contracts?

@@danniwilder2198 Some of these players were getting handed £140 million/8 year contracts, you can bet they are looking at that kind of money and thinking this is most likely the best contract they are going to get over their career just based on expected future performance while they are still young.

@@DaybreakPT £140m contracts? Some have 8 year contracts but NO-ONE, absolutely no-one is being paid anything like £140m. Of all the new young players the highest earner is Enzo Fernandez & he is reckoned to be on around £150k -- £180k per week. Let's go with the £180k: £180k per week is £9.6m per year. That equates to a total of £76.8m over 8 years. The highest paid player at the club is Raheem Sterling & he's on £325k per week. He's got a 5 year contract & 5 years on £325k works out at a total of £84.5m. You would need an 8 year contract at £350k per week for the total sum to be £140m. And no, you would be completely wrong to think any of the young players that Chelsea have recently signed will be looking at their contract & thinking it will be the best contract they'll get in their career. Each & every one of them will have ambitions that will include earning bigger & better contracts in the future. They know they're not on the really big money yet & they also know that if you prove yourself to be a good asset to Chelsea then they will reward you with a bigger salary. Just as they did with Reece James last October when the club gave him a contract worth £250k per week. Anyway, what I've explained is what the normal practice is with players of 19, 20, 21, 22. Remember, Enzo is easily the highest paid among all the new players. Many of them are on much less money. Deivid Washington, for example, the 18 yr old from Brazil, is on just £7,000 a week. Lavia, Ugochukwu, Gusto, are on £45k a week. Gallagher, Madueke, Chalobah, are on £50k per week. Jackson is on £65k. Palmer £75k. Dasisi £80k. Badiashile £90k. Mudryk, Chukwuemeka, £100k. Silva £110k. Caicedo £150k. Cucurella £175k. Fofana £200k. If you think Romeo Lavia thinks a contract worth £45k per week is the best he'll ever get then you're living in la la land. The same with Jackson & £65k per week. The same with Palmer, the same with all of them, they will all be hoping for much bigger contracts eventually. Malo Gusto will be looking at the club's other right-back, Reece James, & be saying to himself if Reece can earn a contract worth £250k per week then so can I. And because Chelsea worked long & hard to make sure they only bought young players of the highest calibre they will be hoping a large number of these young players will develop to a very high level. There'll inevitably be a number of them that don't develop to their full potential, that's only to be expected when you've got a dozen or more very young players. The law of averages means not all of them will become top draw players but there's no reason why the majority of them won't become outstanding top level players. It's hard to see how players like Caicedo & Enzo won't reach the absolute highest levels in the game. Caicedo, for example, has all the qualities needed to eventually be as good as Kante was at his best. Jackson is similar to Drogba in a lot of ways & should be aiming to replicate Drogba's achievements.

Then you simply have no idea at all. The reason these young players have got to where they are in the game already is because they are incredibly ambitious. Someone like Moises Caicedo doesn't want to milk anything, all he wants to do is have a career like N'golo Kante had. He wants to achieve the things Kante achieved. He wouldn't even be able to comprehend the notion of just coasting through his career. And how long do you think a player who did such a thing would last if they had an attitude like that? It's incredible that anyone could be so out of touch with the reality of something like this. Commonsense alone should be enough to make you realise how football players at that level just aren't like this.

Shows what little insight you have. I doubt there's a single manager who could name every player his club have out on loan somewhere if it's a club that loans out a dozen or more players.

@@danniwilder2198 Sorry but its not like he's some random youth academy player who played 0 games.. he's actively in training, and not on loan.

@@hellotherereal He was on loan all last season & then as with all loanees he returned to his club, Chelsea, when all the players return from their summer break. But Malang Sarr has never been a part of the first team's training & is one of a handful of players who train separately, sometimes with the Development squad, sometimes on their own. Sarr is one of those players who isn't a particularly well known name & a player that hasn't been a part of the club's plans for a long time. Certainly long before Pochettino came to the club. Sarr is one of the few players that was left at Cobham when the players went to America for their pre-season. The only reason Sarr is still at Chelsea as of this moment is because he was quite literally the only player the club failed to move on in the summer. Ideally they wanted to sell him but if they couldn't then they'd try for a loan somewhere. The club even got the likes of Lukaku & Ziyech out & to another club last summer. A sale of Lukaku, Ziyech, Kepa, would have been best but a loan deal was all Chelsea could do for now. So three loans & one non-mover & the last remaining player that's still at Cobham is Malang Sarr. So I honestly don't see why there would be any need for Pochettino to know or have heard about a player in Sarr's position. He is literally sitting in the departure lounge waiting around until he leaves.

​@@hellothererealcomplete 🧢🧢🧢 it was a super unfair question, is a big reason why Pep or Klopp never face such difficult questions😡😡

@Matt231985uk If you really are a Chelsea fan for almost 40 years then you should be ashamed & embarrassed by the utter crap you've written here. You are making assumption after assumption about things & not bothering to research anything you're claiming. For example: you are just assuming the players who've signed 7 and 8 yr contracts are on massive salaries. You said players like Mudryk & Caicedo were signed on huge contracts. Mudryk is on £100k per week, Caicedo is on £150k. Romeo Lavia, 19, is on £45k per week. Of all the players on longer than normal contracts, only Enzo & Caicedo are on more than £100k per week. In little over one year the new owners have reduced the annual wage bill by approx £100m. Chelsea have not signed 30 youth players, nothing like it. No-one at Chelsea has said anything about expecting a top 4 finish. If you had the first idea of what you're talking about then you would understand that what the new owners are doing is not only securing the club's future but hopefully its future success too. Other clubs aren't doing things like giving longer contracts? So what, since when was Chelsea a club that didn't lead the way & set the examples? I'm sure other clubs will be watching Chelsea in the coming years & see how these 8 yr contracts pan out. I'm sure the other big clubs will eventually copy Chelsea's policy on this. It reminds me a bit of when we used to see other clubs criticise Chelsea & their use of a large scale loan policy. You can almost predict how these things play out......widespread criticism of the club & it's new & imaginative ideas for the game. For the first few years it's all 'Chelsea is ruining the game', 'Chelsea aren't playing fair', etc, etc. Then as other clubs see how, for example, loaning a large number of players to other clubs is actually beneficial to all parties concerned, so gradually more & more clubs start copying Chelsea. It happened with the policy of loaning players out & it will probably happen with the giving of longer contracts.

Wtf lmao

Azpilicueta was planning to leave & return to Spain 12 months before he actually did. It was only because the club asked him to stay a bit longer that he was even at Chelsea last season. Jorginho's contract was ending at the end of last season. He was on £325k a week, he was 31, & he was past his best & had been below-par for a couple of seasons. Was the club supposed to give a new contract & £325k per week to a 31 yr old player who simply wasn't good enough anymore? Or would it be better to let him leave a few months before his contract ends & thereby receive £12m for him & then replace him with a 21 yr old player like Enzo Fernandez? Kante was also at the end of his contract. He earned even more than Jorginho at £350k per week. He was also in his 30's. Plus for the past couple of seasons he had been extremely injury prone. Should the club really be paying over £300k a week to these players who weren't being of much benefit to the team anymore? Or would it be better to use that money on bringing in some highly talented young players that will be the future of the club?

@@danniwilder2198 why don't Boehly ask them to extend 1 more year then? Or let Jorginho goes for free next yead? They don't need to stay forever, they don't even have to play if it's neutering the childs growth, they just need to mentor whole bunch of kids until they are mentality ready and become leader in backroom and training ground. Current Chelsea crop of players don't have that many "leaders figure" of them aside from James who injured a lot, Chilwell. That's why they must play Gallagher every single week because he is the only supposed "vets" in the club. If I ask you as youngster for a field presence only and both of them plays bad, would you rather have UCL winnerJorginho as your captain or Gallagher? My point is, no matter the circumstances, you can't expect these kids to grow well without guidance of proper senior who've got experience and demand the best for you (even though they were already declined). Not every youngsters have the mentality of Mbappe or Bellingham. Some of them end up like Hudson Odoi or Sancho, Many of them have only just got their confidence after 1 good season, if they moved with high price transfers, they will pressured with expectation to perform, then if their next season turned out to be bad one they would crumbled under price tag pressured and booed on/off the pitch (especially with social media era nowadays). At this situation many youngsters fall and never become who they ever was. That's why mentor/senior figure were needed, especially if your team have many kids with those situation. Sure it's ultimately back to the kids as guys like Sancho were just lazy, but the mentors presence sure were lowering the risk a lot.

@@dclan9813 Jorginho left back in January when he still had a few months left on his contract & so Arsenal had to pay a transfer fee. If he'd left at the end of the season then he could have left on a free transfer. No club is going to offer players like Jorginho or Kante or Azpilicueta a new contract when they're on wages of around £300k a week just so they can mentor young players. And the squad needs to be around a max of 25 or 26 players. Also, some of these players at the tail end of their careers often have one last thing they want to achieve. For example: Azpi wanted to return to Spain & play in the Spanish league before he retires. Rudiger had a good offer from Real Madrid & as we see with many players who get a chance to go to Madrid, it was something he really wanted to do. Similar thing with Alonso & Christensen & being offered a chance to play for Barcelona. Kante had one last chance of securing a huge payday when he got an offer from Saudi Arabia. Plus he has been extremely injury prone in the last few years. Koulibaly, Ziyech, Mendy, Kepa, Aubameyang, Pulisic, RLC, Hudson-Odoi, Lukaku, Havertz, Kovacic, all of these players were better off leaving Chelsea. Regarding Azpilicueta......he was pushing for the club to let him move to Spain before the start of last season, summer 2022, because it was strongly rumoured that Barcelona wanted him. However, Todd Boehly did exactly what you were asking for, he persuaded him to stay for one more season & if he agreed to do that then Chelsea wouldn't ask for a transfer fee, thereby giving him the opportunity for a more lucrative contract with whoever he signed for. The club did exactly the same this summer for N'golo Kante. Kante had one more year remaining on his contract but because he's been such a special player for the club it was decided he could leave on a free transfer. If I remember rightly then I think the club did the same thing for Petr Cech when he went to Arsenal. It's a way of rewarding a player that has been a particularly special servant of the club. Chelsea could have forced Kante to remain at Chelsea for another year if they'd decided to enforce his contract but that would have been an outrageous way to treat Kante at this point in his career.

@Tibbs72 How do you people go around making these assumptions when you know hardly any of the facts? Can anyone really think Chelsea don't know exactly who they're signing? It's so unbelievably dimwitted for someone to think anything you've said bears any resemblance to reality.

Chelsea fans were crowing that they got Enzo before us too! They stole our new midfield! The bastards 😂

@@danthemanwhocancan5263 Never mind, after all, you did get, what's his name, oh yeah.....Endo Watura. And the other kid that didn't come up to scratch at Bayern Munich......Gravenberk or something. Oh well, can't win 'em all I guess. Maybe next time you'll have more luck & get one or two of your main transfer targets.

@JAY1892 Laughing your arse off.....at what.....who you had to settle for in their place? Be positive, look at it this way....Chelsea signed Mo Salah when Liverpool had thought he was signing for them. He didn't, he changed his mind at the last moment after Chelsea swooped in with an offer for him. However, because Salah was only 21 & wasn't at the level where he was a regular in the Chelsea team he went out on loan &, well, point is he ended up at Liverpool & when he was in his prime too. So, Liverpool may have missed out on Caicedo & of getting their hands on a future world class player on this occasion but as the Salah situation showed, you never know what might happen in the future. I must say though, as a Chelsea fan it seemed only fitting that we should snap up this midfield diamond of a player because we have done so well when we have this type of player. There was Claude Makelele, then N'golo Kante, now there's Moises Caicedo. The first two were utterly world class & the third one, Caicedo, is sure to reach that same level before too long. Still, there's always the signing of Endo Watura to cheer you up. LOL

​@@danniwilder219811th after spending a billion pounds. Shameless 😂😂

Agreed. Chelsea need to fail not because I dislike them, because their strategy is a daunting precedent to exist.

Fantastic way at looking at it, I agree with it man!

As a Brighton fan I have to say it is absolutely delicious watching Chelsea floundering above the relegation spots while we’re in 3rd. They took our (at the time) best ever manager, our back room staff and one of our best players and they all flopped instantly and we’ve beaten them twice. Just lovely 😎

It has occurred to me that money is being syphoned somewhere - hence the number of players bought and sold. None of it makes footballing sense that's for sure. Over priced and over paid mercenaries, but it's in someone's interest to keep the money flowing.

@slightlyslowersongs Of course there are 'footballing reasons' behind everything the club owners are doing. Maybe you just ain't bright enough to understand what they are, did you consider that? Yes, just like 99% of football club owners, Todd Boehly & Co are going to be running their football club business as a business. How were you expecting them to run it, like a charity? You seem to be disgusted at the thought of a club owner trying to make his club profitable. Try to understand this basic principle.....the more successful the football club is off the pitch then the more that helps the club be successful on the pitch. Has it come as a shock to you that the people who have invested huge sums of money into purchasing an asset are going to want to make that asset increase in value? Roman Abramovich was unique, a one-off, you shouldn't compare anyone else that owns a football club with him & with the way he ran the club. And let me put you right on something else......you accuse Chelsea of hoarding young players under Boehly. But the fact is Chelsea have fewer young players out on loan to other clubs at the moment than they have had in many years. It's true that the large majority of the squad this season are young players, but so what, is it wrong to build a squad of primarily young players? If it turns out that in a few years the club was to make a healthy profit on any of the young players they've recently signed then so what, wouldn't that be good business? Is it wrong in some way if Chelsea sign a young player, then spend a few years developing that player, & then if that player isn't right for Chelsea's first team then selling the player for a good profit? Isn't that the business Chelsea are in? Brighton are a 'real' club? What, like you're a 'real' knob? What the fuck is a real club? Because they are little & can't operate on the level that Chelsea does, that makes them a real club? Chelsea Football Club has more passion & integrity than most others do. That's the reality of it & it's that that makes you so bitter & resentful. It's because of that passion & belief that has taken them to things like CL trophies & to 25 years of regular success.

I do remember Abramovich was criticized many times for sacking managers too often, but it did work and kept the standards at the club high. That’s also because there was always a core set of leaders that knew what Chelsea meant to hold the line too

@@Vizeh forgot to tell u this that the last years under abramovich were not good tho he was able to keep us in a place where we could still win and I bet that it would have gotten better. Boehly came in here and took us to 12th…

@@skullxishim No, Todd Boehly never took Chelsea to 12th, the manager & the players did that all by themselves.

@@danniwilder2198 when did I say that? I agree the players are at fault also

@@danniwilder2198 tho i think things will start clicking soon fourfourtwos newest vedio basically explains why if you would like you should take a look

I agree with that honestly

Lavia is the one that bothers me as a liverpool fan. He would've been a starter here with Bajcetic as back up, instead he's tied to what? An 8 year contract playing second fiddle to Caicedo and Enzo. Awful career move.

The modern chelsea wasnt built only on money abramovich was a fucking good owner and fans are starting to notice that now. when he fitst came in he didnt distrub anything and send players out and in. he gave our manager 4 playere and we got top 4 that yr. then he sacked him because he wanted to get mourinhho from porto who just won the ucl. he gave mourinho the players he wanted while keeping some the talent we had at the club before mourinho like JT and lampard. dam I mis abramovich

Also srry for my spelling ikl fix that later i was just in a hurry and im typing on a fridge dont ask questions lmaoo

Also caicedo didnt go for money he wnted to stay loyal for chelsea and simply money isnt the ony factor understand ur point tho

lmao.

Lmao the copium is hard on this one.

@@nanathegoat5106 you have to cope brother, how did you cope with your favorite team losing.

⁠@@anyhumanbeingno the copium that you are on is something else. In any other league if something like this happened the owner would get absolutely f***** by the fans. If you changed your complete squad two times in a span of 2 years or so and spent over 1 billion dollars and don’t get results you deserve to be relegated imo. The player look like that they don’t even play in the team. This team has no soul and isn’t hungry whatsoever if it doesn’t change I see Chelsea relegated

Also to add on top to the spending, alot of our money is gonna be paid across the next 8/9/10 years. So whilst it will eventually total 1 billion, in terms of what we've actually spent it's probably closer to around half of that

Best team in championship 😢

Ironic this comment coming from an arsenal fan as you guys won't be singing champions of anything

Sorry about todays game lad

for gods sake

Hey sorry about today's game but you can also see burnley get battered by newcastle aswell to make you feel better in about a week, I don't feel good about our tie with spurs but hey one loss doesn't define your entire season, you lads might make it out of relegation

Thank you my friend❤

Ikr people bringing politics and the hypocrisy of it is just down right laughable

You good man? Not making Europe in some time? You born yesterday?

​@@CommunionCupsBy some way, they meant even being in the Conference League and getting the revenues from that, as little as they may be compared to the Champions League or even Europa League.

@@CommunionCups You good man? I have no idea what you're referring to or talking about? Other commenter gets it though

@@haha2134 Yea my apologies. I thought your comment said they hadn't made Europe in some "time". Not way. I was like, didn't they just win champions league 2 years ago? Haha

@@CommunionCups No worries, yeah I was referring to the fact that FFP wasn't failed despite last season finishing 12th and no Europe revenue of any kind to balance out the ridiculous spend