Ks chitra, alka yagnik, kavita krishnamurthy, shreya ghoshal, sunidhi

Lata ji, Alka yagnik, sherya ghoshal ,falguni pathak . Because I love there voice and versatility and personality. Who is your fav female singer ?

Prologue is 4 mins long. By the time I lost patience. Sorry dude, this is just completely nonsense format.

Lata Ji Geeta Dutt Ji and Asha ji. Do make a vedio on Guru Dutt Ji and Geeta Dutt ji

jonita gandhi and palak muchhal, shilpa rao, shreya ghoshal(for songs like bhalobashar morshum and chal rastaye saji tram line) note:I cannot tolerate shrill or sharp voices💀💀💀💀🤌

Views ka chakkar hai BABAU BHAIYA . Content ki kami ki vajah se ye sab hota hai .

🤓

clickbait!

That's how marketing works :)

It's intentional, you probably would have never clicked on it, i certainly wouldn't

You mean, she isn't a good woman (or rather a shady woman).

Even when Arijit Singh is dominating industry with so many songs, there are so many other singers too who gets good songs works hard. There are so many times it happened that, Arijit Singh himself sent directors to other singers, saying they can sing better than him.

​@@vikashkumar5807even Lataji did that. She left so many songs due to lack of time and the style of the song that she thought others would sing better. And even in her era there were many other renowned singers too so?

@@sushmitatiwari1307 I wasn't comparing Lata ji with Arijit Singh. I have also said that he is dominating the industry but I was just saying that he don't do it forcibly or by politics. He respects the art and other artists.

@@vikashkumar5807 so does she doesn't she?

Yes. Unsubscribe

Now it’s Arijit n Arijit clones ? 😂

​​@@drfeelgood7886 Arijit is only singing 1 or no song in movies. He has 1 song in Animal and no song in sam bahadur .Other songs are sung by other singers. While an old singer used to sing all 8-10 songs alone. That's why Lata Mangeshkar has 30000 songs, Mohammed Rafi sung 10000 songs, Kumar Sanu sang 5000 songs. But Arijit has only sung less than 900 songs in past 14 years. Arijit has now become more selectivve. He is just singing 2-3 songs in a month because now he is selecting best compositions with best lyrics like vida karo, terr hawaale, moh na laage. Talking about Arijit's clones , it is not his problem. There are many Kishore Kumar and Lata Mangeshkar clones available too. Kishore Kumar clones - Kumar Sanu ,Amit Kumar, Abhijeet Bhattacharya Lata Mangeshkar clones - Alka Yagnik, Suman Kalyanpur, Sadhana Sargam. Many Arijit's clones have slightly similar vocal texture but they can't copy his vocal abilties. For example , Darshan Raval has little similar vocal texture but he can't sing classical and all types of songs like Arijit. Darshan can't sing binte dil song of Arijit. I am not hating on Darshan .I am only writing truth. Popularity of Arijit in 21th century is like Kishore Kumar was in 20th century. That's why both singers have some clones. Fun fact : Arijit was born in 1987 i.e. the same year in which Kishore Kumar died. Only one reason why some buddhas have problem with Arijit : Because he is a singer of this generation who is better and more successful than most singers of their old generation . They can't get nostalgia after listening him because he is not their childhood singer. Ego of buddhas get hurt whenever they hear the name of Arijit.

True. There were monopoly among singers in old times. There was no internet so people didn't knew about many talented artists. Only connections with bollywood people were mattered in old times. We all know about monopoly of Kumar Sanu in 90's. By singing same type of simple flat slow repetitive romantic songs and copying Kishore Kumar from nose, he became the king of 90's music and continously won 5 filmfare awards. He sang 28 songs in 1 day due to monopoly in music industry in 90's. Has this so called melody king has sung anything other than 'hey hey la la' in his whole career? If internet was available at that time, then Kishore Kumar and Kumar Sanu also would have got many negative comments like Arijit. The problem with Arijit that he is unnecessarily hated by some haraami nostalgia merchants due to availability of social media. Different people have different opinions now on popular artists. Now anybody can talk about popular artists while sitting from their home.

@@hello.667 buddy i can understand you’re a Arijit fan bouy. But by saying Arijit’s name I don’t mean he’s singing in every film or doing 10 songs a film. Obviously you cannot compare with yesteryear’s musicians/film stars. But you’ll see in most of the big budget films there’ll be an Arijit number with formulated music tune which has a greater probability of becoming a hit. Music directors/ producers either want Arijit or Arijit sounding clones. These are not my words, there are plenty interviews by senior musicians on YT. Despite so many fans, in last few years we barely got to hear Late KK, Shaan, Sonu Nigam , Kunal Ganjawala, Mohit Chauhan. It’s not a rocket science to understand, more than art / faith in the artist, producers n record labels are following the market trajectories n economics. 😛

​@@drfeelgood7886 I can see you are an egoistic ghamandi buddha who can't accept if a new generation singer is better than most singers of your generation. You said that I can't compare rijit with yesteryear's musicians? film stars. What a stereotypical and cheap thinking you have ! Shame on you buddhe. Arijit is new generation singer but it doesn't mean that he can't be better than any yesteryear's musician. You have written that musicians want Arijit's clones. But it was similar in 90's Musicians wanted Rafi and Kishore clones that's why Kumar Sanu (Kishore clone) ,Sonu Nigam (Rafi clone) and Alka Yagnik (Lata ji clone) became popular in 90's. You buddhas have too much ghamand for everything of their generation. You can't accept if something of this generation is better than most of your generation. Mohit ,Shaan, KK etc stopped getting work in 2010's decade because they don't have versatility and singing style like Arijit. They became outdated and irrelavent for modern generation just like Mohammed Aziz and Amit Kumar were outdated in 90's generation. It is just a game of time ,nothing else. Watch Sonu Nigam's interviews. Nowadays he is praising Arijit in his every new interview. He rated himself 5 and Arijit 7.

100% true

Suman bahut achchi singer thi uska career barbad kr diya is lata ne 😢

To usko bolo khud ke style me kyu nhi gaya😂😂 sirf lata ki copy krti thi​@@asianguy86

That song was also selected for Asha Bhosale,but she cheated towards her own sister.

@@crazyadi6422 lata ki copy krti thi 🤦 Taau sare lata ke fans ywhi nautanki karenge Lata se kai achchi singers thi in reality Suman aur anuradha ke sath jo bhosle mangeskar sisters ne kraa vph saff dikhta hain aise kao singers ko mauka nhi milna nhi diyaa

Yup unfortunate

But asha was an equal selfish bully

Yes this I have heard from my father too that she tried ruining Asha bhosle's career too

@@vedantrustyShamshad begum was a great singer too but lata played politics

Suman bahut achchi singer thi uska career barbad kr diya is lata ne 😢

Bas limelight cahiye shasta

Because she was a bully

She did bully upcoming singers to maintain the number 1 tag.

​@@vipulverma3597and she is still the biggest singer India ever had

@@Ot4blink987 ofcourse you'd be the biggest when you don't let upcoming artists to get work. Nobody denies her talent and hardwork and her soothing voice, but everyone has a grey/dark side, this was hers.

sure

Everybody sang in that era...People loved and responded favorably to all good singers...Who did not get work...Suman, Hemlata, Vani, Anuradha, Runa Laila, nazia hassan etc etc etc.. all have songs recorded. But problem with them was that all wanted equal share or same position as Lata.. they were jealous of her supremacy....None of the abovementioned singers had that independent ability to make their songs hit for long or replace Lata.. Raj kapoor did experiments with other singers but did not work out.. What can Lata do for this...😁😁

@@udaybaviskar2422 i don't think so because Anuraadha and Suman Kalyanpur were doing so good... And i think they could have sung in better voice than Lata ji because They have young melodious voice but they didn't get any opportunity because of directors producers who wanted same voice for their movies... Everyone had unique voice but directors always wanted other singers to sing in Lata ji 's voice so their own unique voice kept hidden... Saat Samundar paar song was sung by other singer not lata ji still it got famous...

@@Shivani-kw9kx It is easy to cry victim and gain sympathy.. All have got bharooor opportunity and have sung good number of songs😀. But they have limitations in many ways.. they dont sound great nor creat the effect what Lata did!! After hearing Latas voice and gayaki ears dont agree with anybody else or anything less..

Exactly, same as Arijit Singh

Jao aur unkey 'gazal' suno pata chalega wo kya thi.

Yeah i can understand. It's a personal taste. e.g. i can't bear Death Metal growlers.

If Lata sang Asha style too then Asha would have had no space. A sis created a space for her Sis. Also it was an intelligent decision not to sing opposite character songs.. India celebrities tend to follow a specific line to fulfill the image in public. Lata gained a image/represented a voice of a mainstream Indian woman.. who does not have 'Disco, Jazzy tendency. That imageade her so so so big!! Not that she cannot sing what Asha sang. Thats Y lata even checked the words of the song, what is the scene of the song.. to avoid any anti-image element.

Just what I feel

@@udaybaviskar2422 😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘🥰

Lol 😂😂😂

She started learning music since she was 6 . Kishore Kumar himself said in his interview that she was very skilled classical singer and he was not .

@@manasuniyal2897 Yes

I mean yes DTPH is still one of my favourite music albums from 90s

What,,,????really

Not really . But thr was no cover system Back then.

they have a point though

I think 90s main female singer could have done better work in term of overall balance . As a 60 year old singing for 30 year old doesnt look best all the time in bollywood imo.

hmmmm good point

😂😂 for people with terrible taste MJ, Metallica and beatles are more iconic than this terrible singer

@@mazebankMK2 Ek legend(Lata Ji) ko praise karne ke liye dusre legend(MJ) ki disrespect karna zaroori nahi hota 🤡

@@mazebankMK2 Also how is Lata a terrible singer, Lockdown kid hai kya love day?! 🤡

@@mazebankMK2 lol. dont compare lata with Beatles and MJ , she was a great legendary singer and mj and beatles were revolutionary and legendary , totally apples and oranges

Apne hi baap ka hain ki kisi USA vale kaa?​@@mazebankMK2

Arijit is great playback singer. You are an ignorant old fool. Shame on you haraami buddhe. Arijit's voice suits on new generation heroes like Ranbir Kapoor, Sushant Singh Rajput ,Kartik Aryan etc and many more. But you are judging him by his voice on old generation heros. He is most versatile singer. He can change his singing style and textures. For example - binte dil (arabic), chain of thoughts (western), main parwana (retro), vida karo (retro), hulchul (rock), gaaytri mantra jaap (classical), jhoome jo pathaan (pop), shanivaar raati (party). He is the only singer who can time travel though songs by singing both old and modern style songs. Shor Kumar sang in same style for different actors. He sounded same while singing for Amitabh Bachhan and Rishi Kapoor. Ranbir Kapoor, Sushant Singh Rajput, Kartik Aryan and many more actors suits a lot on Arijit's soulful voice.

Playback singing died just after Rafi sahab. Rest all singers be it Kishore kumar, Udit, Sanu, kk or Mohit Chauhan sings in their own styles which many times don't even suit many actors.

@@un-known1147 ...kishore kumar is no.1 artist 🔥. Dont b rafi chamcha

@@imrealtalk108Just say you are high on something. Sonu or Arijit stand ahead of Kishore. And my point still stands Except Rafi no singer actually did playback. Kishore had the same style for Amitabh and the same for Rishi. kapoor.

@@un-known1147 ...fully disagree. thr is No better artist then kishore kumat in playback + acting . Arjit n sonu are not even in top 5 .

nah ! u forgot Kishore Da & Lata didi combo💞

ahhh!

Spb did the same in south Indian industry..

@sbyoutube092 oh C'mon man! Every single individual knows that The Great Mohammad Rafi Sahab and So-called Saraswati personified Lata Mangeshkar combo is the best of all the times! No one can replace 'em.

​@@vedantrusty😅

She knew, her father was classical music, every kid of that family can sing, do you really think she doesn't know classical music?

She Was Old Era Prostitute No One Going to say this... In This Video Vedant Exposed Chapri Lata.. Kudos To Him

@@thepossessedseries9014 yeah, dude. The way she picked tunes, it's very hard to believe that she didn't have the classical knowledge. Someone like Kishor Kumar is very believable as you'll veryy rarely see him hitting complex sur or alaap.

Yes and becz of her voice Veer Zara songs r still memorized ❤❤

hmmmm

Not at all.. there her voice already lost it all. Other young singers would have done justice to the song. I would consider that one in the list of ruined song. Her best time was 70 -80s.

Its only due to her voice the songs were remembered

​@@nilimat.1645 the character Zara was also old, new voice would not do justice with her character.

ahhh

hmmmmm

Yup, seemed to be a common understanding of that era

Definitely not!

Yah true bro. If you listen to lata ji's 70s and 80s songs then to 90s song then you can certainly note the change . And it would be better if young singer like alka or Kavita Krishnamurthy or someone else had sang the songs . But totally against that lata ji's voice ruined these songs.

I can’t seem to agree with you here. I think she did an amazing job singing for Yash Raj movies. I cannot fathom anybody else taking up that position.

Don't think so her voice was matured but on point in 90s

classical training is different from music training

​@@vedantrustyshe was classically trained. Her father was a classical vocalist and she learnt from her. If she wasn't classically trained, she would not have been able to sing the highly classical based songs she sang in her long career-

Ohhh please wake up . Tum kya jano bharat Ratna ka jadu .

@@amansharmalatamangeshkarbh1624 pls don't be delusional lata lacks versatility in her voice and the voice pitch🤡🤡🤡

@@amansharmalatamangeshkarbh1624also shayad I like Shreya more is bcs I literally grew up listening to her like you might've grown up listening to lata ji. Just like how Shreya loves and absolutely admires and looks up to lata ji, I do the same for Shreya.

Ahh yes comment section is always entertaining 🗣️🗣️

@chunghashubby2808 she lack versatility only in hiphop n cheap songs and it's extremely excellent . Because can't accept the God of music to sing such songs

yus

yes that's the point of the video

You dont need to... but she did it anyways... that is the point...

@@thesarasohrabi Did you even watch the video, she actually didn't bully anyone, she even refused to accept any firlfare awards to give newcomers a chance.

​@@thesarasohrabi she did not people are insane nowadays to accuse anyone anything

Dude you don't the reality shr ruined whole market controlled it infact

sure

Her father was legendary classical singer and Sangeet Natak artist. So she inherited his singing in her childhood.

agreed

She's was classically trained singer

She had 2 ustaads

She definitely did learn as Pandit Dinanath Mangeshkar’s daughter, though maybe she didn’t perform it often. There is one rare recording of her Raag Malkauns khayal somewhere on KZfaq.

bhai ye hi to explain karne ke liye video banaya hai, dekh to le 😭

That is called click bait.

I’ll try

let's agree to disagree

True! I don't see a problem with it.

Her voice however beautiful it may be, always sounded like coming from an eloquent lady, not from a young beauty between 18-24 years old. Which created a dissonance. It suited the female characters of the 60s-80s, but with movies as the age of the female actresses dropped, the voice needed to be changed. For example, Shreya Ghoshal has a forever youthful voice, but still, for a younger, sultry character or wanting a rawer, huskier voice you have the talents of Shilpa Rao, Shalmali Kholgade and Parampara Tandon. The songs they sang would not have worked with Shreya Ghoshal's voice. Sunidi Chauhan is truly a more versatile singer but even she has limitations.

It wud have been better if sung by some else, popular those times rather than by a singer who sounded too old 😂

@@Harsh12351 if Latha madam had not sung those 90's 2000' songs those songs would had not become famous nor all time fav songs , We would had not know their names also. Whatever people say for many of us Latha madam 's voice suited for all generation. Without her voice those songs would had not become Evergreen songs . The new singers who you are mentioning except Shreya Ghoshal madam all those singers cannot create that charisma which latha madam had created through those songs

I am just 19 how I am lataji's greatest fan ?

Who are you to judge lataji??? I am 20 .love lataji's voice..I think you have no respect for olders..

Agree

That's called Basics of KZfaq. They need it for u to click on this videos

Using her to sell ur video..come on pata kuch ghanta nahi hai lamba bio chhap dala

sure

hahahah I'd assume that's a compliment

It is

so true

I agree

thanks man

No;pe. KS Chi;tra is.

Damn

Was your mother a guptchar .

which scientist where did they so research, ? :D

No lata mangeshkar is incomparable

Not really, because in the past, for 40/50 years straight, Lata ji was singing in almost every bollywood movie and her voice was heard in literally every corner of the country. We can't say the same about Shreya. No doubt she's a fabulous singer but the kind of impact Lata ji has left is just unmatchable. You don't find shreya ghoshal in every bollywood movie nowadays. She sings less and does shows more which is what lata ji did towards the end of her career

​@@amansharmalatamangeshkarbh1624ikr! People here in the comments comparing Lata ji with other singers without much knowledge about her contribution is just too much!

​@@dddanie884 bro Shreya ji not only singing in bolly but also in other languages and Today's bollywood become so male centric female solo songs bante hi kitne hai , but still Shreya Ghoshal is the only pre digital singer who is dominating the Indian industry , agar lataji ajj ke jamane Mai young hoti to popularity mai Neha kakkad ko bhi nahi Hara pati, And Shreya ji is more versatile and Better' vocalist than Lata ji

thanks man

indeed

it was

Asha ji was more into disco modern music she dominated later years . Both were good

Asha ji was most versatile singer!!!

Have to admit yes me too. If a singer becomes too obvious in their songs then I just start looking for someone new 😅

you'd be one of few actually

​@@KapilSharma-mp9rpYEAH BOTH ARE MY FAV ONES...ALSO LISTEN TO BOTH SISTERS CLASSICAL SONGS..I AM MARATHI AND THERE ARE MANY GREAT SONGS IN MARATHI OF THESE BOTH SISTERS SO I RECOMMEND IT!❤

There's this interview of Amitabh and his whole family hosted by Simi. I don't remember the name of the show... rendezvous with Simi or something like that, you'll find it on KZfaq. You'll see Jaya wasn't particularly well respected by Amitabh during that interview.

@@manibun727 yes I have only seen snippets of that. Where she was saying that he thinks it's a waste of time to do romantic conversations with wife and he agreed to it. She was a very established actress and sophisticated, it can be seen in her old interviews. She became bitter because everyone always compared her with Rekha and as if she was the one who stood between her and Amitabh. Society never penalises the man in extramarital affairs, it's always the women who gets bitter end of the stick.

Noted, thanks man!

Ohhh please that is not even possible.

thanks

agreed

she still is

Was? She ain't dead 💀

Correct

That is your personal opinion. But Arijit has better voice and versatility than those monotonous old singers. He knows how to make listeners feel the song. He is known as king of soulful voice. You can search on google. Listen to 'main phir bhi tumko chahunga' and 'uska hi banana' songs. These are legendary songs by him. Monotonous nasal overrated copycat Kumar Sanu established monopoly in 90's. We all know the monopoly of Shor Kumar in 70's. Arijit has better voice. Arijit is most versatile singer and he has sung all types of songs from classical (gaaytri mantra jaap), arabic (binte dil), retro (main parwana) to pop (shanivaar raati), western (chain of thoughts). Music directors are choosing Arijit because he did justice to every kind of song and he has most heart touching voice ever. Listen to 'vida karo' and 'main parwana' song it feels like Mohammed Rafi is singing. Listen to 'sajde' song it feels like Nusrat Fateh sahab is singing. Listen to 'Rishton ke saare manzar' song to feel Ghulam Ali vibe. Arijit was sounding like an arabic singer in 'binte dil' song. Listen to his new song 'satyanaas'. It is a fun track. Will you believe that he is the same singer who sang 'vida kar' song recently? Even Sonu Nigam gave Arijit more rating than himself. There is a reason for it.

@@vatsalsanwaria537 Not correct

thankssss

Thanks a ton

@@vedantrusty pleasure is all mine so well deserved

Yes, I feel the same.

All are false rumors. Wake up

Thanks for sharing!

did rafi took his money?rafi was richer than lata.he also has business.

@@arifujjamansahake5371 It's not about having business or being richer. It's about having a moral backbone and not being too greedy.