The Counterfactual Show: Reimagining History, with Stephen Kotkin | GoodFellows

  Рет қаралды 132,953

Hoover Institution

Hoover Institution

23 күн бұрын

Historians differ over the need to explore “counterfactuals”-the study of scenarios that never happened-and what they can tell us about historical causation. Stephen Kotkin, the Hoover Institution’s Kleinheinz Senior Fellow and noted historian of Russia, joins Hoover senior fellows Niall Ferguson and John Cochrane to discuss alternative historical outcomes: Stalin not surviving a two-front invasion in World War II and Churchill dying well beforehand; the American Revolution failing; the Beatles never spearheading pop music’s British Invasion; a Trump victory in 2020 and its potential effect on the current state of affairs in Ukraine and the Middle East; plus a world in which COVID never happened (spoiler alert: it might have impacted John and Niall’s book sales).
ABOUT THE SERIES
GoodFellows, a Hoover Institution broadcast, features senior fellows John Cochrane, Niall Ferguson, and H.R. McMaster discussing the social, economic, and geostrategic ramifications of this changed world. They can’t banter over lunch these days, but they continue their spirited conversation online about what comes next, as we look forward to an end to the crisis.
For more on this series visit, www.hoover.org/goodfellows.
The opinions expressed on this channel are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Hoover Institution or Stanford University.
© 2024 by the Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University.

Пікірлер: 202
@Zero_Zero_Zero_Zero
@Zero_Zero_Zero_Zero 22 күн бұрын
We love it when you guys have historian Joe Pesci on.
@jlziux
@jlziux 22 күн бұрын
Kotkin on Goodfellas?? It’s Christmas, boys and girls
@Filisteu1900
@Filisteu1900 22 күн бұрын
Dr. Kotkin should be there more frequently 🎉 Highly entertaining 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
@GentlemanJack705
@GentlemanJack705 22 күн бұрын
Kotkin! The man! The myth! The LEGEND!
@syjiang
@syjiang 22 күн бұрын
Love to see Kotkin back!
@philipford6183
@philipford6183 22 күн бұрын
A nice surprise to see Stephen Kotkin parachuted in to cover for the General. Also, a great many history fans enjoy counterfactuals. Thanks for this conversation!
@Michael-tz7tj
@Michael-tz7tj 22 күн бұрын
Stephen Kotkin. What a treat.
@keeganretzlaff6582
@keeganretzlaff6582 22 күн бұрын
Always happy to listen to Steven Kotkin. Such an interesting person to listen to.
@ActFast
@ActFast 22 күн бұрын
YES!!! KOTKIN! KOTKIN! KOTKIN!
@hatalatesting6476
@hatalatesting6476 21 күн бұрын
Kotkin has absolutely upped his sartorial game. Man's got some drip fr
@stooge389
@stooge389 22 күн бұрын
HOLY SHIT GOODFELLOWS IN PERSON WITHOUT AN AUDIENCE!!!!! CHRISTMAS IS NOW MAY 16TH🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
@rosmacmahon7812
@rosmacmahon7812 21 күн бұрын
Kotkin needs his own KZfaq for all GeoPolitics he’d make a fucking mint.
@dr.davidboisselle7399
@dr.davidboisselle7399 21 күн бұрын
I feel so much smarter every time I watch the GoodFellows -- thank you!
@raymondswenson1268
@raymondswenson1268 22 күн бұрын
The armed forces conduct war games all the time, trying to explore possible conflicts and the way they can be resolved in our favor. Every proposal for new legislation is an argument that we can divert the course of social history into a better outcome. Part of military studies is reconsidering how past wars and battles could have been better resolved. During my five years at Strategic Air Command, I participated in exercises involving response to nuclear weapon accidents, and playing out recovery from nuclear attacks on the US. Answering these "What If" questions for possible future scenarios is essential to planning for government agencies.
@stooge389
@stooge389 22 күн бұрын
WHEN IS STEPHEN KOTKIN GONNA BE ON GOODFELLOWS AGAIN WHEN GOODFELLOWS WHEN
@stooge389
@stooge389 22 күн бұрын
(I'm only 1 minute and 27 seconds in)
@ruairifahy1872
@ruairifahy1872 22 күн бұрын
A great show. Still ploughing my way through Kotkins Stalin x 3.
@RN-lo6xc
@RN-lo6xc 22 күн бұрын
Been waiting for this - amazing trio and an unmatched guest
@NNovoselski
@NNovoselski 21 күн бұрын
Yes Kotkin ❤❤❤❤
@katejoyce2725
@katejoyce2725 21 күн бұрын
I get so excited every time I find a new video with Steven Kotkin!!!
@danp8950
@danp8950 22 күн бұрын
Brilliant discussion.
@Sollicitus_civis
@Sollicitus_civis 21 күн бұрын
Did I hear that right...4 classes on T. Swift and none on Vietnam? Nothing wrong with teaching elements of Swift from music or business but I am shocked that not one history or political science course on Vietnam. Tell it like a true Jersey boy, Kotkin "I deal in big historical questions." Love it!!
@henrymroth9455
@henrymroth9455 21 күн бұрын
I love these guys! Including McMaster. Keep up the great work.
@benmirault5933
@benmirault5933 15 күн бұрын
God I could watch a 4 hour run of this show. 1.5 hours is never enough!!!!
@MMircea
@MMircea 22 күн бұрын
Joe Pesci back in the wolf's layer. A pleasure, as always
@richardhausig9493
@richardhausig9493 17 күн бұрын
Prof Kotkin is the best. If I could have any 3 historical dinner guests, Kotkin would be one, imagine him questioning the other two.
@robsrockinout
@robsrockinout 19 күн бұрын
The amount of contention and relief in this conversation is both palpable and remarkable. Dr. Kotkin is an absolute mediator when it comes to historical disagreements. God bless you all and thank you for sharing this with the general public. Thank you for bringing order to this disarray.
@lawrencefrost9063
@lawrencefrost9063 22 күн бұрын
Why can't these be longer
@bogeyb200
@bogeyb200 21 күн бұрын
I could listen to this all day, every day. Start a separate show like this. I'll pay for it
@alexandrebittencourttande3264
@alexandrebittencourttande3264 17 күн бұрын
I watch most of your talks, but I have to say this one was the best! Professor Kotkin is always a delight to hear from. Thanks!
@Thanos916
@Thanos916 22 күн бұрын
Looking forward to this one.
@pedrinhograna443
@pedrinhograna443 22 күн бұрын
Greetings from Brazil! 🇧🇷
@jess7150
@jess7150 21 күн бұрын
Excellent conversation!
@JT-qs4tv
@JT-qs4tv 9 күн бұрын
What a real pleasure these conversations are. Thank you.
@RightSideNews
@RightSideNews 22 күн бұрын
Kotkin is great
@karthiknarayan1888
@karthiknarayan1888 22 күн бұрын
Just want to say, with regards to the discussion about the contributions of the railroad to American Economic Growth, Robert Fogel in 1970 wrote a fascinating book on exactly this question. The correct counterfactual to railroad construction, he argues, is canal extensions and with that in mind, the marginal contribution of railroads to american economic growth was quite small
@obfuscati
@obfuscati 20 күн бұрын
Goodfellows is behind the times. Let these guys expand on their ideas. What's with the hour time limit? It's not cable TV
@rsjmail
@rsjmail 19 күн бұрын
Ferguson and Cochrane love to hear themselves talk about nothing. Not even Stephen Kotkin could save this episode. If they were talking about something that wasn’t sooo self-indulgent, maybe Kotkin would have made it watchable. Where’s H.R.? I can’t stomach the other two without him. And I think this is the first time I’ve Ferguson in six months where he hasn’t mentioned Cold War TOOOOO! His GENIUS insight! Who else in the whole world would have come up with rhetoric idea of adding II to Cold War to describe the exact same experience between the exact same powers a Second time. It’s GENIUS!!! Neal, you trademarked that right??
@paulmobley9645
@paulmobley9645 16 күн бұрын
I really liked this show so much on the topic of counter factuals. Star Trek had an episode of going back in time to stop Hitler. It raised similar questions about single "butterfly" events impact on the future of chaotic systems. Yet to take on the show with several was very nambitious. I could not enjoy it all at one sitting and would stop between transitions to the next. I also appreciate the humour and lighter side of the show to make the history lessons so enjoyable. What I did learn is the accident of Churchill in America not covered by many historians as a possible counterfactual event as was done on this very compelling show. THANKS for taking us on the trip.
@icecoldfroste
@icecoldfroste 19 күн бұрын
Great show! Keep them coming! The Counterfactual questions are great and entertaining to listen to. Stephen Kotkin is always a great addition as well.
@timobanon1865
@timobanon1865 20 күн бұрын
It always seems like the Goodfellows are having fun, even when arguing with one another. That's good stuff. We viewers are blessed if we enjoy it 1/2 as much as they do. I appreciate this level of scholarship being offered to all of us, for free. Thank you, sirs.
@passerbyp8531
@passerbyp8531 21 күн бұрын
Bravo!
@paularivero1878
@paularivero1878 17 күн бұрын
Great great great interaction among three brilliant people. Thank you so much. We need more of this amazingly complex arguments about methodology and epistemology in History❤❤
@charlesdavis3802
@charlesdavis3802 22 күн бұрын
profound discussion. tyvm.
@murryrozansky8753
@murryrozansky8753 22 күн бұрын
Fellow Kotkin, When is Stalin 3 going to be available? I hope to be able to read how his story ends before I do.
@user-we2qv1cx6x
@user-we2qv1cx6x 22 күн бұрын
Excellent talk. Thank you
@Probez44
@Probez44 20 күн бұрын
Kotkin adds spice to the fellas. Make him more permanent. Great episode!
@derekohachey
@derekohachey 19 күн бұрын
I've watched Stephen Kotkin over the last decade and always appreciate his thoughts.. also want to observe one important trend about Dr. Kotkin, he is better dressed as the years progress! I challenge anyone who disagrees and welcome projections in how we will see him in 5 years! Great show once again guys!
@Spudgun81
@Spudgun81 17 күн бұрын
What an excellent discussion. More of this please!
@lizgichora6472
@lizgichora6472 20 күн бұрын
Enriching Historical Facts of WWII events to the present, " Beetles vs Stones? " Thank you very much Niall Ferguson, Stephen Kotkin, John Cochrane and H.R McMaster.
@noogie13
@noogie13 19 күн бұрын
Kotkin simply outclasses the other two. Easily.
@rogerparkhurst5796
@rogerparkhurst5796 16 күн бұрын
Thank you! Always interesting when SK is on.
@fabioj2000
@fabioj2000 21 күн бұрын
Kotkin taking Hoover to 1M subs is guaranteed at this point.
@sl1msn1per
@sl1msn1per 21 күн бұрын
So much fun! Please do another one of these
@juanmillaruelo7647
@juanmillaruelo7647 18 күн бұрын
Excellent deep dive. Wonderful!
@chrisgreene2623
@chrisgreene2623 20 күн бұрын
Well that was just over an hour well spent with fascinating discourse.
@user-vl8io4je5q
@user-vl8io4je5q 16 күн бұрын
Stephen Kotkin is a brilliant historian - the counterfactual when analyzed by reference to past events is an indicator of future - it's the concept of conflagrations.
@dankohlmeyer9172
@dankohlmeyer9172 20 күн бұрын
Best Goodfellows episode yet!
@notlimey
@notlimey 20 күн бұрын
Yay! Collingwood - my guide to the study of history
@biggeordiecliffordd8609
@biggeordiecliffordd8609 20 күн бұрын
Seems to be a frisson between Neil & Stephen Kotkin. Adds to the pleasure of the discussion.
@TalkernateHistory
@TalkernateHistory 16 күн бұрын
If Niall and Stephen linked up to make Virtual History II, that would be a dream come true
@shawnzeppo4361
@shawnzeppo4361 21 күн бұрын
Love Neil Ferguson's reference to Axis and Allies and other strategy games @<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="1829">30:29</a> . Historians need to play these games to experience simulated counter factuals, even if they are highly oversimplified like he mentions.
@tabithadorcas7763
@tabithadorcas7763 20 күн бұрын
Excellent! Thank you!
@mattieboy7777
@mattieboy7777 21 күн бұрын
Kotkin is so witty. Great guest!!
@user-vl8io4je5q
@user-vl8io4je5q 16 күн бұрын
Its important to always take account of the counterfactual - the first occasion it was introduced was the Court of King's Bench - en banc.
@k.u.5798
@k.u.5798 19 күн бұрын
Kotkin episode, instant watch.
@27natedogg1
@27natedogg1 22 күн бұрын
Wish they had John Goodman there to yell “Cochran you’re out of your element!”
@a.s.clifton544
@a.s.clifton544 22 күн бұрын
The seating makes it look as if Mr. Ferguson is addressing a tennis match.
@ned900
@ned900 21 күн бұрын
Great conversation, realy enjoyed that
@fredflintstone7924
@fredflintstone7924 16 күн бұрын
thank you, this was brilliant!
@d0lvl0
@d0lvl0 17 күн бұрын
Thank God Kotkin is keeping the unfortunate partisanship of this show in check.
@majozishow
@majozishow 21 күн бұрын
My favourite podcast. Big fan from South Africa!
@majozishow
@majozishow 21 күн бұрын
And excellent conversation!
@Jagentic
@Jagentic 22 күн бұрын
excellent panel -rich and in-depth I only wish the time didn’t constrain the crux parsing banter.. pseudo assassination suppositions… sadly coincide with the newest and Slavic case study
@adot911
@adot911 22 күн бұрын
My favorite people
@i.p2088
@i.p2088 18 күн бұрын
Excellent discussion.
@joebeatty7961
@joebeatty7961 20 күн бұрын
Very good discussion.
@patrickevans8482
@patrickevans8482 21 күн бұрын
When is Stalin Vol 3 coming?? Hurry up, please.😂
@RasmusDyhrFrederiksen
@RasmusDyhrFrederiksen 18 күн бұрын
What a treat, thanks ;-)
@jpmor7327
@jpmor7327 20 күн бұрын
This needs to be heard
@akp167
@akp167 20 күн бұрын
Crazy how this is free
@doniphandiatribes
@doniphandiatribes 21 күн бұрын
Always brilliant
@ainslieberrafella
@ainslieberrafella 18 күн бұрын
I could feel my brain getting bigger as I watched this. 👍
@Aryan32459
@Aryan32459 21 күн бұрын
Revux impact is a testament to its unique approach.
@cswanson4476
@cswanson4476 17 күн бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="711">11:51</a> Cochrane’s description of a “trend” in historiography is unrecognizable to me. I have, just this year so far, tore through several scholarly histories, written between 1997 or so and 2017: _Where the Negroes are Masters: An African Port in the Era of the Slave Trade_ by Sparks, _The Crucible of Islam_ by Bowersock, _Taming Manhattan: Environmental Battles in the Antebellum City_ by McNeur, _Horses at Work: Harnessing Power in Industrial America_ by Greene, _Treason in the Northern Quarter: War, Terror, and the Rule of Law in the Dutch Revolt_ by Nierop, and _This Vast Southern Empire: Slaveholders at the Helm of American Foreign Policy_ by Karp. Only the last two could be seen as attempting to assess responsibility for atrocities. But even they both proceed precisely as Cochran prescribes: by seeking to reconstruct the understandings, expectations, interests, fears and enthusiasms of the participants. I can only wonder what sort of historiography he has sampled.
@garbonomics
@garbonomics 20 күн бұрын
I loved the playful nature of this episode as well as an interesting view of counterfactual history.
@lost.projects387
@lost.projects387 19 күн бұрын
Fun episode!
@vz6365
@vz6365 20 күн бұрын
Who is for this to be weekly with all five good fellows?
@nathanngumi8467
@nathanngumi8467 20 күн бұрын
A great episode! The team should have made this episode in two parts to get through all nine counterfactuals instead of just four. The civil rights double episode of Uncommon Knowledge with Peter Robinson (which Dr. Condoleeza Rice featured in) is a good reference in this regard.
@andrewyao9921
@andrewyao9921 9 күн бұрын
Great fun to watch! It a melding of freshman year, late night pseudo-intellectual debates and middle aged, actual-intellectual PhD‘s. 😉
@crazypaulinquebec
@crazypaulinquebec 15 күн бұрын
''4 classes on Taylor Swift and none on the Vietnam war - they are just trying to balance the kid's education...'' - geez, Stephen Kotkin has to sign up as a writer (or presenter) on SNL!! Too funny!! What a great mind and what a great sense of humor.
@jontycrossick9569
@jontycrossick9569 21 күн бұрын
Bill is awesome!
@letdaseinlive
@letdaseinlive 21 күн бұрын
The notion that someone else would have come up with relativity theory is wrong. Because it ignores how eccentric the specific version is. There would have been some other theory which did something else.
@kreek22
@kreek22 20 күн бұрын
Empirical advances in cosmology would have revealed the general theory, about 50 years late.
@user-vl8io4je5q
@user-vl8io4je5q 20 күн бұрын
Put simply the counterfactual is what would have happened now, if we don’t act now - their guidance is our passage to equality 😊
@raymondswenson1268
@raymondswenson1268 22 күн бұрын
If Japan had declared war on USSR, it could have interdicted the war materiel that was shipped across the Pacific from the US to Vladivostok.
@Emmu-Inrio
@Emmu-Inrio 19 күн бұрын
Naill’s pointed remark about “historians aren’t novelists” raises a relevant idea about historiography, the act of writing history. Histories are written as a narrative - with a beginning, middle, and an end - because that’s how humans best process information. There’s no other way history can be written for a consuming general audience. And as factual history is written with a clean, tightly organized narrative structure of cause and effect, it gives the ILLUSION of determinism. As a result, the exercise of the counterfactual is viewed in haste as a frivolous or inconsequential to the understanding of the past. Needless to inform our company, the word “history” is Greek in origin of inquiry. However, its Old English root derives from Latin: story.
@johnbentley7834
@johnbentley7834 15 күн бұрын
Regarding America's War for Independence I have a few observations that may not have been discussed: 0. The British Empire didn't simply give up, the war became prohibitively costly at a time of considerable financial strain. 1. America could have outright lost the war, say in 1880; that doesn't imply America would not have fought another war, and another, until they would have ultimately won. The War of 1812, in fact, was another test. 2. The strong ideals of independence and liberty were, and still are very much American and not necessarily shared in the same degree elsewhere. 3. Canadian colonies had not the same core values, they were predominantly populated by loyalists; before and after the Revolution. 4. Today, Canada would not need to fight a war, they could simply decide to be a Constitutional Republic. They don't (same for Australia, New Zeeland). 5. Even to this day, immigrant populations mainly self select between USA and other countries, like Canada, based on idea affiliations of what they comsider to be most important to their lives. In my opinion, the United States would have ended in the same place, even if another route would have been necessary.
@pgr3290
@pgr3290 20 күн бұрын
Churchill has one of the maddest lives in modern history. Yes everyone knows him for leading Britain in WW2, but everything about his life and career is incredible. Yes you also may know about Gallipoli too. What about his prison escape across Africa? Do you know he was the driving force that greenlit the development money for the world's first tank and demanded mechanization of the army? He opposed severe terms on the defeated Germany in 1918, in a small minority. He got run over by a car in New York. He had personally met and knew at least nine presidents of the USA. He knew Mark Twain and Charlie Chaplin. He constantly tried to get to the front during WW2, nearly getting killed or captured more than once due to his proximity.
@user-vl8io4je5q
@user-vl8io4je5q 16 күн бұрын
Concentrate on this part - as the non aggression pact agreed in 1939 between Hitlxr and Stalin is not in discussion. The breach of non aggression pact by Hitlxr is when Stalin was invaded and had to join WW2. Because his mis-read Hitlxr assurance he would not invade Russia. And create a war on two fronts.
@brianwallace9997
@brianwallace9997 18 күн бұрын
Five Days in London: May 1940 by John Lukacs is a fantastic short read that focuses on how critical Churchill was in dealing with the defeatest sentiment in his government. (I think you can get a copy for under $10). Had Halifax been Prime Minister the outcome would been very different.
@kingcrazymani4133
@kingcrazymani4133 21 күн бұрын
John made a terrific point about correlation vs. causation. Crazyman abandoned the basic concept when the celestial cheat sheet was made available. Worth a discussion some day, maybe when John is in the Swamp. It’s looking as if I’m gonna have to be in the building in the thumbnail. <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="2280">38:00</a>. Prior to 1941, Zhukhov had been fighting the Imperial Japanese Army in Eastern Mongolia and Manchuria. Successfully. <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="60">1:00</a>:00. Dr. Kotkin is leaving out someone he is supposed to know.
@michaeljacobs4546
@michaeljacobs4546 20 күн бұрын
Just after I wrote the below @ <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="660">11:00</a> Cochrane addressed my confusion, which makes sense in that I am much closer to being an economist than a historian.
The Axis of Chaos, with Matt Pottinger  | GoodFellows
48:02
Hoover Institution
Рет қаралды 73 М.
A Historian of the Future: Five More Questions for Stephen Kotkin
1:29:50
Hoover Institution
Рет қаралды 2,5 МЛН
100😭🎉 #thankyou
00:28
はじめしゃちょー(hajime)
Рет қаралды 56 МЛН
Eccentric clown jack #short #angel #clown
00:33
Super Beauty team
Рет қаралды 29 МЛН
Как быстро замутить ЭлектроСамокат
00:59
ЖЕЛЕЗНЫЙ КОРОЛЬ
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
Stalin at War - Stephen Kotkin
54:01
Institute for Advanced Study
Рет қаралды 709 М.
Stephen Kotkin on Lost in Translation: World Order & Word Order | HISPBC Ch.1
33:50
A Dangerous Moment, with Douglas Murray | Uncommon Knowledge
58:34
Hoover Institution
Рет қаралды 263 М.
Stephen Kotkin: Russia’s Murky Future | Foreign Affairs Interview
50:51
Stephen Kotkin: Six Futures of Russia-Why We Need History (and Libraries) | LIVE from NYPL
1:13:35
Stalin: Waiting for Hitler, 1929-1941
1:26:22
American Historical Association
Рет қаралды 560 М.
Stephen Kotkin: Sphere of Influence II
1:31:05
IWMVienna
Рет қаралды 295 М.
100😭🎉 #thankyou
00:28
はじめしゃちょー(hajime)
Рет қаралды 56 МЛН