I think it was well done. I am glad that the ending frame consisted of photos of the victims. RIP

I mean it's a serial killer come on its just for show the victims are already gone by one man & now it's a series to watch but........ should people enjoy watching this because of all the fked up things that happened or didnt happen (hell no) its enjoyable to watch because in one way you gotta grow the hell up & just watch it as a show......secondly it's a better series to watch than the other terrible waste of money shows/movies. Thirdly a bunch of children younger than the victims are getting killed & i don't see any based on a true story about them......

The show was awesome, It gave you more of an insight about his victims and not only about Dahmer. Evan Peters was amazing Netflix couldn't have chosen a better actor. Evan executed his voice and mannerism perfectly.

I think it's well made. They targeted all the aspects,such as racism,the victims family and backstory. I loved it. Gave it two thumbs up. We all know everybody will not be pleased all the time. But that's life.

It was brilliant 10/10

PTSD for the disturbing content that was filmed not the situation regarding the names. Although it was obvious that the subject matter would be gruesome. The mistake in names shows that the production team does not respect people of colour enough to differentiate.

@@PR7-82 got nothing to do with colour, but everything to do with having a weak character and being a snowflake.

While some scenes are very true to real life, Netflix bends the truth with many facts - meaning that awareness the audience has is a false narrative.

@@bbloomfield6497 the ones in regards to the racism, homophobia and negligence were very accurate. It's not a false, it's very² accurate

What are you on about? Literally everyone knows those detail and why the case was partly popular in the first place like other shows/movies have depicted those three things you listed💀

The pigs needed someone to curb the "undesirables"

@@bbloomfield6497 gvpoo1a

lol fax

I know.PTSD? SERIOUSLY?! She must have really been assaulted, SA'd, tortured, in a war, brutalized, etc. I swear, people want to be "triggered" for any little thing. Plus, the LGBT tag was appropriate. They cant pick and choose based on happy "lighthearted " things. This was real life. And it affected the community back then in a major way.

@@lewasil exactly right I mean are they denying that he was gay or something?

lmao forreal what an idiot

I know. From the late 80s through the 90s, I worked on film crews in New Mexico. On the larger projects, I honestly didn't expect my name to be remembered.

Exactly! People throe around mental illness such as PTSD as if it's easy to be traumatised as catching a cold or something *throw

Soldiers, r*pe victims, even the real people this series depicted, all suffer from real PTSD. Yet this woman is claiming it because she got called the wrong name? Also, don't believe her at all that that was supposed to be a private tweet.

@@Krotas_DeityofConflicts It's insulting that it's used for attention

@@carlosjenkins68 yup²

Nerflix didn't really feel anything but a profit on the actual victims, try having a family member of yours murdered and used in a movie 30 years from now and someone else making a profit with out any notification or consent.

@Jill Skelington I wouldn’t say it’s “young” people. It’s people just raised wrong 95% of the time. That’s up to your parents and so on.. The woman in the video they’re talking about is middle aged, you’re on a video talking about a case that happened in the early 90’s.

@Jill Skelington Fr 😭 Imagine working on a series about a serial killer and getting so emotional over the fact that someone got your name wrong 💀

How the fuck can you get a serious mental health disorder like PTSD from being called the wrong name, that’s the stupidest shit I’ve heard in a long time

Hahahaha😂

Have you seen the trailer? Before the release I didn't know much about the Dahmer story but the trailer gave me the worst nightmare (being a horror movie fan myself, the trailer is even more bone chilling than the show)... I could totally imagine how traumatic it must have been for the ppl who live through it

Evan Peters did amazing, a masterpiece.

@@happy_clouds Masterpiece indeed. Most definitely. I can't stress that enough!

They were all outstanding but Evan Peters, Niecy Nash and Shaun J. Brown were my favorites. I also loved Michael Learned, as grandmother.

Glenda Cleveland AND Tracy Andrews. Both heroic. It showed the terror anyone would feel, but they were determined to prevail.

Bruh Glenda wasn’t even his neighbor

It's a terrible recreation of history when some things are accurate portrayal and some details are changed for the screen. That warps peoples view of history with a false narrative.

@@bbloomfield6497 that happens with everything based on a true story, movies always curve scenes, that’s just the Hollywood way buddy 🤦‍♂️🤣

@@coreycasciano3255 2 or 200 wrongs don't make a right. Real life stories so incredible they warrant being translated to the screen contradict the effort by not remaining truthful and accurate.

@@stgeorge5862 precisely

@@stgeorge5862 Wow, you think that either 1-Jewish people en masse were outraged by Schindler's List, or 2-many Jewish people refused to watch it? You aware Schindler's List was made by a Jew who lost relatives in the Holocaust? Iow, it was a completely different situation. I get that the families of Dahmer's victims feel angry, and I often wonder why so many of us (myself included) love true crime media. I personally feel that the series brought more attention to Dahmer's victims & highlighted the failures of the police, but that doesn't mean people who were involved don't have the right to feel it shouldn't have been made.

💯💯💯

💯

Well I understand what you mean, but since this is one of the top streamed shows at the moment, it’s pretty difficult not to at least acknowledge that it’s a thing. Of course the victim’s families and friends are going to be curious of how they portrayed their sons/brothers/friends and how the show was written. They have every right to have strong feelings about it, especially since they weren’t even aware of the show’s existence prior to its release. It’s easy for us to simply say don’t watch the show, but I doubt it’s as black and white as that. While netflix is profiting so much off of the case, the families are having to relive that trauma without any compensation.

She didn't say she was traumatized by them confusing her with another black person, which there were only 2 of them.....stop switching her words!

@@rbgsista9236 Yeah she did. She said she hasn't watched the show because she didn't want any ptsd flashbacks.

PTSD for the disturbing content that was filmed not the situation regarding the names. Although it was obvious that the subject matter would be gruesome. The mistake in names shows that the production team does not respect people of colour enough to differentiate.

@@PR7-82 No one remembers a PA's name, regardless of color.

I mean to not even ask her is kinda fucked up

Well when you have a loved one brutally murdered the last thing you’d want is to see the killers name to be everywhere.. so put yourself in the families shoes. People are always gonna say something stupid like this.. pfhhhhhh

@@liamjeff3339 Jeffrey Dahmer name has always been “everywhere” This show changes nothing.

Yeaaah nah forreal.

I'm mad about this comment >:[

Modern day society always has something to complain about. It's like how they're trying to cancel these artists who put Jeffrey Dahmer in their lyrics like seriously why does everyone need to cancel everything nowadays. It's silly, you didn't complain then so why now.

Exactly people are just so bored that they need to complain, Dahmer had many films and documentaries about him but this one causes an outrage 🤦‍♂️🤣

Maybe because it’s trendy now to complain about something lol

no soc med back then. Good times.

There wasn't a platform for people to call attention to themselves. As far as I know the only one complaining is the sister who lashed out in court.

Thought that was "2020" I had a good time that year, people always blame the year when it's usually just the people.

Yep true that

The writers changed lots of things from real life creating a misleading and false narrative as well.

@@bbloomfield6497 they were pretty accurate though

@@bbloomfield6497 oh please

@@tarakennedy707 no it wasn't

@@bbloomfield6497 they have to by law😂

Whilst I agree that the subject matter would obviously have been disturbing content going into production that crew should have been aware from the start; I don't agree with you that mental health services are unnecessary. If you don't need those services then don't use those services but you don't have the right to criticize those who do need it. Asking for help is not weakness. People are not all the same. You don't know everything there is to know about their experiences in life to judge

I mean it's sad that the victims families aren't getting any of the money from this

@@tacobell1299 I agree wholeheartedly.

PTSD for the disturbing content that was filmed not the situation regarding the names. Although it was obvious that the subject matter would be gruesome. The mistake in names shows that the production team does not respect people of colour enough to differentiate.

@@PR7-82 Fair enough but it's not real. So I still refuse to accept that you get PTSD from that. You never hear about extras from the Saving Private Ryan opening scence complaining about PTSD, because they weren't actually soldiers or dying on a beach. So when me and my colleague were getting mixed up, is that because people weren't respectful of us being white?

Actually most veterans with PTSD can be traumatized by these movies or everyday events. A car backfiring, sirens, etc. You have no right to disrespect these families and belittle their pain for your enjoyment. It's disgusting but that's probably who you are, a disgusting, selfish human being who might be more like Dahmer than you think.

@@queenroyaltyrules55 well said.... you can't compare traumatic experiences, either. it is stupid

Her PTSD will come back once the money is gone

I understand. Those families don't own the story , I'm confused why they would need to give their permission or blessing.

I loved this series, but I don't think it's valid to compare a huge corporation making entertainment media for profit to the judicial system determining punishment for criminals.

What type of memorial would you suggest be put there? I'm glad that isn't a playground for children there & I have no idea what would be appropriate to be put there.

Lol 😂

Rotten balls.

I agree

💯 agree

Yeah, playing a killer. Shouldn’t even have been made. NO ONE SHOULD KNOW WHO JEFFREY DAHMER IS. People need to stop making terrible people famous.

@@liamjeff3339 who cares. His dead

@@liamjeff3339 Again DAHMER has always been famous saying shit like this is like saying “you can’t mention hitler cause he’s a terrible person”

There has been many biased opinions on this comments page, Not all are going to have the same views, agreed.

Too soon 😂😂😂

Here's the thing: Jeffrey Dahmer was very adamant about being heterosexual. He claimed he chose his victims strictly because they were available and easy. While he was possibly a repressed gay man, we have no way of being sure. It's a lot more nuanced than "a gay serial killer".

He told the cops that Konerak was his gay boyfriend.

agreed… ptsd from being called the wrong name

Whilst I agree that the subject matter would obviously have been disturbing content going into production that crew should have been aware from the start; I don't agree with you that mental health services are unnecessary. If you don't need those services then don't use those services but you don't have the right to criticize those who do need it. Asking for help is not weakness. People are not all the same. You don't know everything there is to know about their experiences in life to judge

I agree but there were only two black women on crew and they were very different in appearance so the mistake in names shows that the production team does not respect people of colour enough to differentiate.

Do you know if the cops harassing the victim’s family over the phone was accurate? I honestly don’t know.

@@someguy7424 yeah, the cops harassed the Asian household. Another fact is, Tracey Edwards later went on to become homeless and arrested for manslaughter

It's Hollywood they never told the complete truth

It also showed compassion for the victims and their families.

Me too .Glenda was annoying as hell and looking for attention because this is her shining moment or something . After Dahmer was arrested she still found a way to stand up and argue about her not moving 😂

@@pauobunyon9791 dude I am telling you! Lol I can’t believe she had the audacity to go to that guy sons funeral just to start crying about how she was the one that called the police and tried to help. They really should have focused more on the other families instead of her and the scenes the Asian dad kept getting hate calls.

Umm u r right but his dad did show and encourage him dissecting roadkill watch his interviews

These are all small details that don’t have anything to do with the final outcome, the victims or their families. Every docuseries and/or biopics take creative liberties here and there for the sake of storytelling. Nothing will ever be a dramatic real time representation of what exactly happened etc. But this comes damn close.

@@mattcollins3591 If a production exists because of real life events, the entire point of it is undermined without being true to those events. Without the understanding of an unreliable narrator premise or disclaimer about "some names, places and events have been changed out of respect" etc. Otherwise the millions of people gulping up the show are learning false history. Would a 9/11 dramatic reenactment, presented as truth be acceptable if they changed history just so it gets more views and clicks? If a story is so incredible it must be retold, telling it intentionally inaccurately is a contradiction.

@@mattcollins3591 I feel like the last two are pretty important both to in show canon and to the real life case. Would Nash’s character have the same intensity if she wasn’t suspicious? She’s part of the reason why the show has so much tension, especially when it’s told from her point of view. The show’s version of Glenda combined two important females from the real case to make her more cinematically dramatic. If they made Nash “more accurate” to the real people, it also reinforces the premise of how the real Dahmer got away with his crimes for so long which is the (and I say this loosely) “allure” to his case-people want to know how he did it; besides homophobia, racism, corruption in power, lack of social media and communication, drawn out procedures, very little people suspected Dahmer so he wasn’t being reported on and the few times people did call police, police didn’t care. Same premise to how stealing is easier when no one is looking and there’s no alarms, but a master thief can outsmart any system in place. That’s what makes it mind bottling. It also shows how skillful Dahmer was “at his craft” because dismembering a body alone, doesn’t matter if you have special equipment or not, is a very noisy and difficult process so for people to not notice that- at least when it came to hiding- means he “was doing something right”: it takes a lot of strength, alot of energy, alot of power, and alot of training to make your muscles resistant to the feeling of actually cutting real muscle and bone. And that’s just the cutting up part. Not to mention how to clean it, how to clean the aftermath, how to get rid of it secretively, how heavy the remains are, how deep a grave has to be dug. It’s definitely a process that will force you to exert energy, have a set stamina, takes time, and it’s not a normal one. Doing all this completely sober in 24 hours or less would wear a body builder out vs Dahmer who was lean, smoked constantly so his breathing is off, constantly drinking, didn’t have a proper diet, didn’t really rest or relax so his body should still be reeling from his “last workout”, getting away with these murders is *almost* biologically not possible so Jeffree was pushing his body to extremes in more ways than one. And I’m saying this as someone with personal experience who use to study anatomy in a lab with equipment and chemicals to get animal parts chopped, embalmed, and ready for schools when it came time to dissection day. In regards to the eyewear, Dahmer choose not to wear his glasses on court days because he didn’t want to see the families. He purposely physically impaired himself since he did feel guilt to an extent. This again reiterates the fact that Dahmer was completely sane at the time of the killings because he knew what he did was wrong, he knew what he did hurt people beyond just the victim, he knew what he did was illegal, he knew he wasn’t normal, but he still wanted to do/repeat the murders and experiments regardless even though much of the process, according to him, wasn’t enjoyable so he didn’t get “that high” that other killers experienced which would get them addicted. So why continue doing it if you didn’t enjoy it or made you happy? Where is the reward? Dahmer was really against people calling him insane, not mentally capable, etc, because it excused his actions when he was fully sound in body and mind when it happened, very much the “if loving you is wrong, then I don’t want to be right” logic. He very strongly believed “what I did was wrong, it was all me, I was born this way, nothing turned me to this, it was illegal on both laws of man and nature, but I did it anyways. Now I get what’s coming to me. Simple.” At least he owned what he did and he didn’t like people trying to dance around how “plain and simple” it was. Obviously in the series they didn’t really show Peter without the glasses because it would break the show’s “illusion”. We’d easily stop focusing on the story and go “oh that’s Peter”. Dahmer choosing not to wear his glasses during trail was an indicator to his psyche while in the series, it’s more of a fashion choice since Peter had to keep the glasses on if he wanted to keep the resemblance to Dahmer going to make his acting more realistic.

@@AdamIshak01 I didn’t read all of that but I stand by what I said lol as long as it’s true to the victims and their families the rest doesn’t matter. Literally nobody cares he was wearing glasses during the trial scene.

More importantly, his *_victims_* were more often than not in the LGBT community, and that absolutely needs to be talked about. We can't just ignore crimes against gay people because it doesn't fit in with the rainbow and glitter aesthetics.

Not a film

@@dietman don’t matter

*Emmy

emmy..oscar is for movies...dahmer is a tv series....emmy gives awards for best of the best tv show...

They do those things for a reason 😂

she just wants a check $$

PTSD for the disturbing content that was filmed not the situation regarding the names. Although it was obvious that the subject matter would be gruesome. The mistake in names shows that the production team does not respect people of colour enough to differentiate.

I wonder if they'll do a biopic for John Wayne Gacy.

@@ciyoduhkriter They could do Ed Gein, or John Wayne Gacy, or… who else could be comparable for another season? 🤔

@@chriswakefieldmusic Nightstalker

If you don't need those services then don't use those services but you don't have the right to criticize those who do need it. Asking for help is not weakness. People are not all the same. You don't know everything there is to know about their experiences in life to judge

PTSD for the disturbing content that was filmed not the situation regarding the names. Although it was obvious that the subject matter would be gruesome. The mistake in names shows that the production team does not respect people of colour enough to differentiate.

@@PR7-82 Doesn't exactly justify much of her whining. A lot of people worked very hard on this show, and nobody else seems to be complaining. So to discredit the entire production because some coworkers didn't know everyone's names, and also that the show is "too scary," isn't exactly gonna win much sympathy from me.

Lazy insult 😜 and actually sexist as there's no universal alternative for the male version

Lmao great comment

Difference is, dahmer wasn’t a flop

She wanted money

I agree, there were only two black women on crew and they were very different in appearance so the mistake in names shows that the production team does not respect people of colour enough to differentiate.

it’s not about “pleasing everyone”, certainly not just the viewers that weren’t involved in anyway, but the victims…? they claimed in that video of evan peters claiming they wanted it to be about the victims, never coming from dahmers pov. but didn’t even care try and talk to those people. used their names and how they looked and dressed, that is the literal legal definition of copyright infringing actually.

Because they both “had braids” haha. You know damn well what she was actually insinuating there.

Lol!