Nice to meet you

Wait, what?

You're an idiot

@J1824 you guys wanted capitalistic society, it is made to be a triangle someone had to be the bottom and the bottom had to be huge thats just how capitalism work

liked for the subtilty.

Two corrupt Zionists who leech off poor Americans. Life in prison for both.

@@doucheowitzpupestein3089 awww you sore loser.

Thank you

They're jealous they've got nothing and he's a CEO, that's the America of today for you

Sociopath *

He mentions his valedictorian status at 0:59

Qué 😂

Adam Reggie I hope his father was career and not a “casual”

John F Some Senior workers should Casual as assets not a thread.Most realized how important Casual be given their proper respect.

Adam Reggie they never get there proper respect, there viewed as temps

Life isn't fair

Life isn't fair. The parasitic capitalist class will realize that when their assets are confiscated by revolutionary workers and farmers governments.

Fred Hampton's Ghost nitwit!

+Fred Hampton's Ghost - Here's some advice, Mr. Socialist. How many people now do you think are "farmers"? Not very many! Far fewer than there used to be! If you want to build something that can challenge the wealthy elite, then you need new ideas for a new age. You need something that the modern "working class" (which includes the office-going middle class) can buy into. Yesterday's working class is today's middle class, since so many more people work in offices now. Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto in 1848. It's a bit outdated now. I am certain that if wealth inequality keeps continuing on its current path, there will be public unrest at some point - it's inevitable. But don't focus on the ideas of "the working classes" that were written 150 years ago. You need to create a movement that the middle classes will buy into as well. You need to create a new paradigm of "class consciousness", just like Marx did all those years ago, because we live in a very different world now.

Daniel Feldman I know I’m 11 months late, but Lloyd didn’t get a bonus during the Great Recession. The only Wall Street executive that did was John Thain at Merrill Lynch. Also, Goldman didn’t cause the recession hence why they were forced to take TARP money. I know it’s the in thing to do in the liberal circles is to blame the successful companies on the recession, but just a touch of research goes a longs ways.

harold 8 New York

harold 8 both are Jews right..

New Yorker lol

brooklyn accent

As populations increase there is more demand less supply for desirable areas/cities prices will increase regardless of a loans,

Very interesting

really?

CONGRATULATIONS

You havent seen Hermes tie in your life, have you?

They both do. But then turns out that's the style lol and yea what the top comment said

Because they did nothing illegal. And a bunch of angry poor people is not enough to get a bunch of fat cats arrested. Because the american system only cares about votes and dollars.(poor people and fat cats) Because as long as you give the poor welfare and the rich don't have to pay for the welfare you get the winning combination for everyone who matters, not the middle class, but the american economic and political system is designed to kill the middle class.

because he runs the government, all politicians are on his payroll. Too big to fail as they say...

in jail? you are too good, my friend

Why would he be in jail?

Another Zionist leeching off hard working Americans. No wonder they were booted out of 100+ countries in the past millennium.

Shrappnells yep

Max Mustermann you mean Lloyd Blankfein.

Why do you think they decided to conduct this interview? www.theguardian.com/business/2016/apr/11/goldman-sachs-2008-financial-crisis-mortagage-backed-securities Do you think they'd settle for 5 bn if they were innocet?

Alter Schwede! (As we say in Germany) Get a life! You are the one insulting people, because they mix up names. "You know others by knowing yourself": ---> "Did you really think I'd buy that BS explanation that you accidentally typed "David Rubenstein" instead of "Lloyd Blankfein"?" ---> "just because you'd screw people over if you'd get the chance, does not mean everyone else will." And if you think Blankfein gives a 1 hour interview on his role in the 2008 financial crisis, in which he present himself as a self made, altruistic average joe, after his company admits to wrongdoing by paying 5 bn and he was called out for fraud in front of the entire world, without any agenda, I feel sorry for you. On that note: Ha det så bra!

Then you didn't really know his name now, did you? :P Of course he had an agenda (everyone does for everything), but when it comes to the "content" of that agenda I withhold my judgment. It's an extremely complex system, and the easy conclusion is to believe in "the evil of bankers", but it's seldom the truth. At the very least, the reality is much more nuanced than that. To put things in perspective: the "housing bubble" gave the poorest americans the opportunity to buy houses they, by normal standards, never could afford, and if the bubble hadn't burst they would probably still live in them happily. With that being said, it was a bit too risky, but hindsight is 20/20! I have a very hard time believing that this settlement was an admittance btw. Most propably, it was solely the most monetary-effecient way of handling it, but that too is conjecture. In reality, we don't know anything more than that they agreed to the settlement. Either way, I don't live my life believing I'm being screwed by "the elite", which makes me much happier so I do not need your pity. Güten tag, mein Herr!

Well, not to come off as arrogant, but... hm... I've studied corporate finance on advanced level (I've got master's degree), and the overall economic system IS too complex to fully understand. Simply put: you try to do one thing and it ends up affecting something you never even considered. Also, people are ignorant/not educated enough. The system is built on the premise that people will act rationally and economically sane, but that's not true at all. Still, it's the "least bad" approach we have, and if you're financially educated you can use the system to work for you, which is partly why the rich get richer. Anyway, with such a complex system it's very hard to establish responsibility, which means it's very hard to prove innocence or blame! But yes, if Goldman Sachs and other banks were an instrument of philantropy they'd write off debts/loans/mortgages etc, but they're not. Every business, whether it's small or big, need to earn money to keep on operating, but that doesn't mean they're evil and willing to do _everything_ for a measly dollar. In theory. Of course some organizations and people are asshats and big banks are not "heaven on earth" filled with angels, but in analogy with what I said in the last paragraph: it's impractical to assume such a premise. I can appreciate the witch hunt in some sense, because you will help keep things in check, but at the end of the day I don't think I agree with you. Your world view seems to be too black and white. Finally, you're obviously not retarded haha! This is the internet! What we lack in non-verbal communication we make up for hyperbolism! With that being said, I was too hard on you! Entschuldigung!

jannie kletz They always exaggerate that point in these interviews.

There was no recession last year