I actually said those exact words in the video lol

Imagine Ubisoft released titles in 5 years? It would mean that they can't miss and we would get titles like ac Unity more.

Quality over quantity

​@@Pointless69-i9vand imagine. We got Ac mirage just last year and now we're getting ac shadows

I don't think this 100% holds up if you think about how much Rockstar has focused on online the last 10 years.

@@khyrianstorms Are you talking about gta online or red dead online? Because both games for the past year or two have not been in the best situation especially red dead online but if you're talking about gta online I wouldn't say Rockstar was only focusing on the online because we know they're mostly working on gta 6, as for gta online it's an online game so it isn't going to have the same level of immersion and detail as a single player game considering the the point of the game is to play with your friends

Lol I definitely need to work on not repeating myself 😅

Keep up the work man, you'll get it

@@Recogneyez thank you

Thanks man! I'll keep that in mind for my next video

Don't forget about gta+ and the currency in rdo, it's honestly such a shame and I really hope this doesn't happen with gta6 but at least with R* their games are actually good😅

It's necessary for rockstar

Agreed, in other R* games like gta 5 or rdr2 there are actually some secrets to discover as well as some cool items to find, I will say with this game specifically AC origins I actually enjoy exploring a bit

@@DangerSuperhero Thank you for the support

Yes that was the core part of the video, pointing out the differences between the two studios and whats common among their games, for example like I said in the video R* games are more fluid and realistic which is what makes their games so immersive well Ubisoft focuses more on the world and gameplay which is why their characters move faster and are more lighter and why their worlds are so beautiful.

@@omista1304 exactly. Most people often fail to understand the difference but thank you for pointing them out!

👌

Interesting POV. Think you nailed it.

good game 😂

I feel the same exact way. Ubisoft and pretty much every other game developer feel cheap in comparison.

Thank you man, Wow I just saw that a few days ago and honestly I never thought ubisoft would stoop so low thanks for giving me more insight on the situation, Ubisoft are honestly prioritizing the wrong things now

Yes every R* is a huge improvement not only for rockstar games but gaming in general while as for ubisoft I think their prioritizing the wrong things at the moment but I wouldn't say every ubisoft game was a huge decline remember AC Odyssey is one of my least favorite ac games was nominated during game of the year 2018 well others like skull and bones was a flop

Thanks man. I've said in my other videos the only way ubisoft can have a come back is if they focus on quality over quantity, I think ubisoft have forgotten or maybe they don't know what the fans want from them, well as for Rockstar as you mentioned can be greedy (gta+) they know what we expect from them and they deliver, I honestly thought after ac mirage released they had finally understood what we want from them, but now they're releasing ac shadows which like I've said in another video will probably end up sucking because these days ubisoft just don't know how to make quality games any more and it's really a shame, hopefully with their new game they can surprise us but it doesn't look like it

you are just so wrong here... if we are speaking of just RELEASES from R* since 2007 there are actually 13 games, not 4. this is excluding DLC's and GTA Online / RDR Online releases. 2007 - GTA Vice City Stories (PS2 re-release) 2007 - Manhunt 2 2008 - Bully Scholarship Edition (re-release of Bully 2 on PS3/X360 and PC) 2008 - GTA4 2008 - Midnight Club LA 2009 - GTA Chinatown Wars 2010 - Red Dead Redemption 2011 - L.A. Noire 2012 - Max Payne 3 2013 - GTA5 2017 - L.A. Noire VR 2018 - Red Dead Redemption 2 2021 - GTA Trilogy Defective Edition (Developed by R*, ported by Grove Street games, published by R*) also, unlike R* ubisoft is a huge publisher with a shit ton more employees and many more IP's. of course Ubisoft would have more game releases than R*. this is not a scale to compare quality - take Square Enix for example: they have a shit ton of releases just like Ubisoft BUT unlike Ubisoft their game releases are actually good lol.

@@HoLDoN4Sec Thanks for correcting me for my comment (Ubisoft having more employees than R*) I forgot that Ubisoft had studios all over the world working on specific games so it would make sense that they would be able to release more games faster, that's my mistake but yes even with all those employees they still can't make good games, for Assassins creed for example ubisoft has Montreal, Quebec, Sofia, and Bordeaux working on different AC games (mostly Montreal tho) and I feel this is why so many AC games are a hit or miss they should have one specific studio preferably Montreal working on AC games to keep things consistent with the story and gameplay.

@@HoLDoN4Sec I should have worded my comment better and mentioned that I was specifically comparing mainline, triple A, high production value games developed and published by Rockstar games. Because I am specifically mentioning about Assassin's Creed getting 13 mainline entries in the same time period, where Gta and Red dead combined got 4(again, mainline entries. I haven't counted gta Chinatown wars for the same reason I didn't count assassin's creed chronicles) Ubisoft's game count otherwise is obviously way higher. The crew, the crew 2, crew motor fest, assassin's creed bloodlines, freedom cry, assassin's creed chronicles, rayman, Prince of persia, Tom clancy games like seige, ghost recon, and division series, games like xdefiant, skull and bones,brawlhalla, riders Republic, and the list goes on, but I was specifically referring to Assassin's Creed. The video was comparing Rockstar's mainline, triple A, high production value cross platform game with Ubisoft's high mainline, Triple A, high production value cross platform game, both of which released in the same year. And hence, as a result, I commented how Rockstar's two main ip's, rdr and gta have had such less number of releases in 17 years compared to Ubisoft's flagship ip's like assassin's creed and far cry, the former of which has had 13 mainline mainline entries in the same time period, which will soon become 14 with ac shadows. You have one company releasing 4 games total for their two flagship ip's, while the other is releasing 3 times that amount for just one of their ip's. Even if you count all those games which you mention, games like LA noire which were not even developed by Rockstar, you'll still have lesser number of games released by Rockstar than Assassin's Creed alone brother. Hence my point about quality over quantity.

@@omista1304 well you are still wrong on the counting then. GTA4 - developed and published by R* Games Midnight Club LA - Developed and Published by R* Games RDR1 - Developed and Published by R* Games Max Payne 3 - Developed and Published by R* Games GTA5 - Developed and Published by R* Games L.A. Noire - Developed and Published by R* Games L.A. Noire VR - Developed and Published by R* Games RDR2 - Developed and Published by R* Games. GTA Defective Edition - Developed by R*, Ported by Grove Street Games (a studio owned by R*), and Published by R* that's 7 main R* Game's Franchises Brand New Releases and/or 9 Mainline Rockstar Game releases since 2007. R* practically owns every single studio that they publish games for, and for the past decade they have been renaming all of their Studio's into Rockstar *City Studio Located*. currently there are 11 active Rockstar Game's studios across the world - working in complete cooperation on the same games. R* Studios consists of around 2000 employees right now. in contrast, Ubisoft similarly to R* owns all of the studios they publish games for and and also renamed almost all of their studios into Ubisoft *insert city name*. currently there are 51 active Ubisoft Studios across the world with multiple studios working in cooperation on every game. Ubisoft consists of around 19,000 employees (which makes it almost 10 times larger than Rockstar Games) right now. so obviously you would except Ubisoft to be pumping at least 10 times more games than Rockstar in the same time period. sure, this is a comparison between Rockstar's mainline releases and AC game releases from 2007, so lets do the math usually there are around 10-15 different Studio's working on AC games since AC Origins (in the old days up until AC4, there were just 5-6 studio's working on AC games). this is compared to Rockstar which have around 5 Studios working on the same game, and a couple of studio's in charge of their online component. however unlike Rockstar, the budget Ubisoft puts on AC games is minuscule in comparison to Rockstar, the complexity of Ubisoft's AC games is no where near as sophisticated as that in Rockstar games. so obviously over the span of 17 years Ubisoft would be able to pump out 12 games, and Rockstar would be able to pump out 7 games. Rockstar's budget for development and complexity in their games is bigger than Ubisoft, in fact i think that the budget for GTA5 alone was larger than all AC games from AC1 - AC4 Black flag combined (thats 5 different games!), and that was just one single game from Rockstar. so, again you really cant compare both companies. for Ubisoft Assassins Creed is just one of many active IP's they are regularly releasing. for R* they are releasing one single major title every 5-8 YEARS with an enormous budget that Ubisoft Studios could just dream of getting for a single game. GTA5's budget was at around 1 billion dollars US$. it is rumored that the budget of GTA6 is estimated to be at over 2 billion US$, in contrast it was estimated that the budget for AC Mirage was at around 150-200 Million US$, AC Valhalla at around 160-170 Million, AC Origins at around 140-150 Million. you can practically take all AC games ever made and probably never reach the budget of GTA6. it is just insane. so again, there really is absolutely no comparison that can be made between Rockstar games and Ubisoft. its like comparing Apples to Peaches - they are both Fruit, but different

Ubisoft releases games more often than R* it's a common thing they have studios worldwide working on their games so they can release games faster than R* also I wasn't "comparing" the games, I used rdr2 to represent R* and AC Origins to represent Ubisoft I was pointing out the DIFFERENCES between the two studios and what they prioritize, it's a comment thing for Ubisoft characters to be lighter and faster and to be able to run on the spot (AC, Watch Dogs Ghost recon ect.) and its common for R* characters to be slower and have weight to them because most R* games prioritize detail and immersion.

@@omista1304 When you show differences between 2 things by definition you "compare" them.. lol

@@omista1304 That's litteraly the definition look. "a consideration or estimate of the similarities or dissimilarities between two things or people."

Haha yeah you're right and even if they do milk gta6 until ps7 I already know I'll be one of the idiots buying the game over and over again XD

Thanks for the feedback. Quality over quantity matters rd2 released 8 years after rdr1 and 5 years after gta5 well as for ubisoft right after releasing origins we got ac odyssey a year later, same thing with ac mirage and ac shadows they should take their time when making games because the jump from origins to odyssey was not that big in my opinion

@@omista1304 a balance of quality and quantity matters. Odyssey gameplay, branching narratives and open mission design is far ahead of what rdr2 offered in those departments. Failing while also taking time is just bad. And this is what happened with rdr2 movement, shooting mechanics and mission design. The quality of horse balls is not relevant to gameplay, or impactful in any way, and the writing in rdr2 was average at best (though witcher 3 and bg3 are the only well written video games to date). Rdr2 was similar to what marvel do in the movie business, just a big budget blockbuster which can't compete on any level to games that do each component far better, only exceeding expectation in the beautiful graphically detailed open world.

@@monalisa-bs4zs Details matter well you are right its not relevant in gameplay it helps with immersion, as for gameplay in the video I wasn't necessarily comparing the 2 games but pointing out their differences and what the two studios prioritize, I cant speak on gameplay specifically and which is better because these are two very different games, as for what you said about the writing in rdr2 being average at best I would like an explanation as to why you say that as in my opinion the game is very well written.

@@omista1304 It is poorly written because it needs to appeal to the lowest common denominator (everyone) to make back its massive budget, which is similar to ubisoft titles. The writing is like all rockstar titles, juvenile with nothing too sophisticated or risky so as to appease the masses and not exclude children or anyone from understanding its simple themes; Death bad and friends good is just way too simple to be taken seriously from a writing perspective, it is carried by great music and voice acting but ultimately extremely shallow. Read some great books or play the best written games and it is easy to see.

@@monalisa-bs4zs Then what games would you recommend?

My bad😂