He would have been except Watergate happened

He wasn't locked up because they wanted their plans leaked. A bluff is useless if it is not transmitted.

This is why USA must be terminated and soon.

one of the exremely rare good jeews

He was intelligent. That plan was NOT

Not quite a miracle. But a timeline. Tick tock. ⏰

Asking the government to protect journalists is like asking the politicians don’t lobby, it will never happen in US.

Your criminal leaders only support those who create anti China fake news

Go, amy and juan... Ton, a MER a...

Journalist Recording and reporting Crimes...Hurt & Hits..Mexican and others countries..Many killed.. The players get political jobs..Courtiers..

I enjoy listening to it on radio here in Europe. Even as a conservative. Let's unite against all unrighteousness - let's not let "them" divide us.

​@@JLar-bb5hlhere here!

This is why USA must be terminated and soon.

They sure push fear of Trump above all else, what a couple of hypocrites. Trump wasn't against free press, he always pointed out how unfair and not free it is. Fake news is real. Propaganda news is real. And of course with every conservative President they always tout nuclear war but the truth is we are always closer to war with a demonrat Prez. I loathe these people. Phony's who always try and con the less educated with fancy wordsmith.

Trump came closer to pardoning assange than Biden ever will. Trump was threatened when he wanted to pardon him, his only hope is RFK

HERO

Truth-Sayers would be better.

This situation is described by Edward Herman’s “power law of access” and the “inverse power law of truthfulness,”. The greater the economic and political power, the easier it is to gain access to the media which equates to “more freedom granted, to tell complete lies”. All these mass media transmissions and thousands more, in essence have become extensions and enablers of techno-capitalism, baptized by mainstream science and well paid experts, backed by millions of yes men, women, even teenagers and children.

It’s karma

Yes, that the USA did in Japan will follow them forever.

The Japanese got off easy. How many young, innocent American men were murdered and tortured by those cretins? Visit some of the Veteran Cemeteries and look at the grave stones and then tell me what you think?

He was left speechless.

Hard truth. Many Americans would not be alive today had their grandfathers been forced into a ground invasion of Japan. A lot of these clowns have no idea about ww2 and the ATROCITIES committed by Japan’s military.

Yeah..

Respect

Release date. July 21.2023. My Korean era Father would have 94 years..1929 model..

General Patton..if Everyone thinking alike.. No one is thinking... Patton on Leadership..

Brilliant.Thank you

"You'll have to answer to the Coca Cola company."

Many Totally tribal ..I visit tough neighborhoods for Fun .and thankfully leave the hood..

"postponed"

Possibly be forgotten?😮

@@albertplumerAmericans will never coexist peacefully with both Russia and China. WWIII is inevitable. From 2018 The planning of WWIII. “A bipartisan commission appointed by Congress issued a lengthy report Tuesday backing the Pentagon’s plans to prepare for a “great-power” war against Russia, China, or both, making clear that the Trump administration’s belligerent policies are shared by the Democratic Party. Safe in the knowledge that its findings will never be seriously reported by the mass media, the authors of this report do not mince words about what such a war will mean. A war between the United States and China, which according to the report might break out within four years, will be “horrendous” and “devastating.” The military will “face greater losses than at any time in decades.” Such a war could lead to “rapid nuclear escalation,” and American civilians will be attacked and likely killed. It is impossible to understand anything in American politics without recognizing one fundamental reality: the events and scandals that dominate political discourse, which make it onto the evening news and into headlines on news sites and social media feeds, have precious little to do with the considerations of those who actually make decisions. The media talking heads play their assigned roles, knowing that the most important topics can be discussed only within very circumscribed limits. Those who actually make policy-a select group of high-ranking members of Congress, Pentagon officials, and think-tank staffers, as well as White House aides-speak an entirely different language among themselves, and in publications they know the general public will not read, and the media will not seriously report.

From June 2015-the inevitability of WWIII because Russia stopped US terrorists in Syria. “As an aggressor nation, which believes self-righteously in its superiority and views its offensive actions as defensive, the United States is deeply unhappy about the fact that Russia is bombing CIA-trained terrorists. That it armed and trained terrorists to topple a sitting government is of course not examined as problematic or as worthy to reflect on. How will the US respond to the loss of its hegemonic control over Syria? Commentator magazine argues that the Pentagon is now preparing a response whose details of course remain secret. It proposes placing US air jets near by Russian jets with the hope of provoking the Russian jets to shoot them down in order to provoke an international incident and a third world war. It argues that today as in the course of the first world war, US and Russian interests are that divergent that a world war seems inevitable, while advocating for it even as it claims with supposed innocence that such a war may just be something that has to take place. It is also possible that the US will seek to provide false intelligence on a given ISIS target at a particular area while the target happens to be a densely populated school or a hospital, in order to present Russia as a mass-killer of civilians (a position of moral superiority which it desperately seeks as they deflect attention from its own crimes). Additional scenarios may be encouraging wahabi terrorism inside the Russian Federation, orchestrating terrorist attacks in Moscow, providing Syrian rebels with missiles to bring down military jets or giving a green light to Kiev to launch a full attack on Donbass. The ideal incident would be one in which Russia is clearly presented as an aggressor in the US public opinion and as a situation in which an argument can be made that the US must attack Russia as a matter of self-defense. Americans can be easily deceived into believing that Russia attacked US soldiers out of the blue and therefore Russia should take extra precautions to avoid into such traps.”

From the late 2019 forecast update from Deagel, Guide to Military and Civil Aviation The situation between the three great powers has changed dramatically. The only relevant achievement of the Western powers during the past decade has been the formation of a strategic alliance, both military and economic, between Russia and China. Right now the potential partnership between Russia and the European Union (EU) is dead with Russia turning definitively towards China. That was from the beginning the most likely outcome. Russia has been preparing for a major war since 2008 and China has been increasing her military capabilities for the last 20 years. Today China is not a second tier power compared with the United States. Both in military and economic terms China is at the same level and in some specific areas are far ahead. Six years ago the likelihood of a major war was tiny. Since then it has grown steadily and dramatically and today is by far the most likely major event in the 2020s. The ultimate conflict can come from two ways. A conventional conflict involving at least two major powers that escalates into an open nuclear war. A second scenario is possible in the 2025-2030 timeframe. A Russian sneak first strike against the United States and its allies with the new S-500, strategic missile defenses, Yasen-M submarines, INF Zircon and Kalibr missiles and some new space asset playing the key role. The sneak first strike would involve all Russian missile strategic forces branches (bombers and ground-based missiles) at the different stages of such attack that would be strategic translation of what was seen in Syria in November 2015. There was no report that the Russian had such a capability of launching a high precision, multiple, combined arms attack at targets 2,000+ kilometers away. Western intelligence had no clue. The irony is that since the end of the Cold War the United States has been maneuvering through NATO to achieve a position to execute a first strike over Russia and now it seems that the first strike may occur but the country finished would be the United States.

Yes. A true American hero. Such people give us all hope. We all need to honour his memory by continuing to fight the good fight. We must categorically oppose nuclear weapons and work to disarm them in every country.🗽

Evil knows no bounds

Unfortunately the majority of the Americans refuse to face the truth as they don't want their illusions shattered

Ha! China has been at war with the USA for decades! All Out War. Long before Tik Tok...

What are you babbling about? The plans Ellsberg was talking about have never been executed, and arguably prevented all direct war - nuclear or conventional - between the Soviet Union and the U.S./Europe throughout the Cold War. Unfortunately the U.S. has since followed a policy of abject resignation and appeasement of the Russian imperialist dictatorship, leading to tge horrific devastation of Syria and Ukraine that we now witness. How much blood is on your hands, btw? Have you blinked?

Psychotic greed, all done to keep their profits high.

Psychotic greed, all done to keep their profits high.

@@marianhunt8899 You have no idea what you're talking about.

If it were, you wouldn't be here. But don't worry, on this channel even the most absurd hyperbole is acceptable if pointed in the right direction.

As one of the brainwashed people, let me reiterate that I see a difference between journalism and illegal hacking and then leaking of classified material. It would be interesting to know how many of the same sanctimonious people condemning the indictments of Assange have been cheering the indictment of Trump (who didn't even leak material but just removed it from a designated secure location).

​@@sheilamacdougal4874That's the point. If Trump wanted justice or transparency he would have leaked information reflecting that. But he didn't. False equivalences are a waste of time If anything, they just reveal the biases of the presenter.

@@moniqueloomis9772 Ah, so you think Assange's actual hacking and leaking of classified material is defensible because "he wanted justice", whereas Trump's simple removal of classified material without leaking is indefensible because he didn't do it for justice. If that distinction were legislated the very status of "classified" would instantly collapse, and if you think a modern government could be run without secrets, you understand very little about governance and the world in which we live.

In the book, he recounts the day him and a Rand Corp colleague was the film. Leaving the theater after, he commented that what they just saw was not satire but a documentary!

In psychiatry that original sin is called antisocial personality disorder.

Cool what was the strong argument the Nazis made?

Psychotic greed drives all this destruction.

Ben Franklin mentioned most people were Suicidal.. Most quiet and Slow..