Perfectly stated. Thank you, and God bless.

How has he proven himself?

@@grantm6514 Creation. All throughout the Bible 1,817 prophesies that have ALL been fulfilled, exactly to the last detail. This is mathematically impossible, yet history proves it’s true. The way the universe is designed. Science points to God, despite other’s objections to this, of which they have no proof, just narratives. Quite a bit more proof too.

How exactly are you sure that it's God's word? anyone can write anything,and say it's God's word...for example... God said you must surrender any and all property to me...if I say God said it, what's to make you believe it's not true?

@@kellyanne7225 unfortunately there haven't been that many prophesies fulfilled... it's been proven that a lot were written after the fact,and some aren't prophesies at all

Amen 🙏

Amen! Me too!

Except that it's not God who said it, but a bunch of bickering Jews hundreds of years later.

God's word tells you to stone your disobedient child.

If the evidence says it didn't, then it didn't

He'll always have the final word!!

Along with Jabal al-lawz, Sodom and Gomorrah and much more.

I so agree with you

Why not place a replica chariot axle and wheels in this spot and see what the coral growth looks like?

Wyatt was a con artist who made many claims of finding many biblical sites. He also lied about finded the ark of the covenant. 2 Maccabees says that the ark will not be found until the end times.

@@TheresaPowers, Interesting how you quote a book that was not inspired by the Holy Ghost. I won't list the reasons why it is so, but you have to be careful what you believe it true. Many books were written, but they are not all prophetic especially when they contradict the writings of actual scripture.

@@gdblackthorn4137 actully according to the The Book of Chronicles, The Ark of the Covenant was shelved under the Temple mount... so ye wyatt lied about that one so it will fits his belifs (about jesus)

Barry Marshall mostly because coral takes a very long time to produce, also it could be that coral wouldn’t form at all on it. Although within the bible as we see in the video it states there were six hundred chariots so with that many although some might not have had any coral growth and simply been covered in sand other chariots would have had the potential to grow such coral. Which I think is quite evident by the unique corals in this video. Although it’s a really cool idea to prove this it would take a long time and has the potential of not working, but who knows if we could produce hundreds of chariot replicas we might see the same kind of growths :)

If you're basing what you believe to be true on anything Ron Wyatt has to say? then you better go back to school.the man was a charlatan

True and yes🫶🕊🪻💯

ron found it . people make it sound as if they found it

Ron is a dishonest Conman.

Yes. in Ron's pictures and video back in about the 80's, there was much less coral growth, and chariot wheels and related could be clearly identified. They even found one gold (sheathed) wheel upon which little growth could occur. But they could not be touched or recovered as they were much too fragile. Ron's material is still online today. Check it out.

David Panton THE WORLD NEEDS TO KNOW GOD IS ALIVE AND WATCHING ALWAYS 💯✅❤️😁👍🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻. #GODISGOOD. #GODISAWESOME. #GODREIGNSFOREVERANDALWAYS. 💯✅💁

Not to mention CS Lewis and Lee Strobel.

There is no science in the Bible. It is a book of myths, fables, and saga's written by bronze age goat herders and religious leaders for the purpose of controlling their population. To think otherwise makes you delusional.

Genevieve Coster because I was recommended this video since I’m a scuba diver 😂

Fairytales 😂

How so?

@@M.E-Martinez😂

If corals has to grow on objects then how did so mane objects get there?@@Nande_Stevens

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity....

Sorry for raining on your parade Christians. But your wheel is Mickey mouse, Dodgy, Bogus, Pie in the sky rubbish. Grasp for another straw.

“A spiritual feeling”? Well, that could never be misleading, now, could it?

@@Michael-pn5lp. It could be done and the actual route has already been identified and proven.

@@annemurphy9339 Laurence of Arabia couldn't do it in three days on camels !

I really want someone to scan these with the same thing as what scanned the "old computer" in the ocean(gears inside)

ALL OF THEM !

@@southern_merican "...The Antikythera mechanism is an Ancient Greek hand-powered orrery described as the oldest known example of an analogue computer.." --Wiki. Yes, secrets like that.

Wyatt is a proven charlatan.

Actually?...NO!!!

@@lrcavalli290 sure he did. I've known about this for more then 25 years. This is old news.

@@maximusmeridius6610 it's old news that it's been debunked,also

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity....

Hi

What truth?... you'll find no truth in a book written by,and for sheep headers, living in the desert

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity....

I have found recently this epiphany that people are going to believe what they want to believe in spite of whatever evidence you give them

@@Jeremy-mu6cd you are so right !

because the video is doctored bullshit

This shows that the Bible is genuine. Very obvious!

@@dadajulius6489 the Bible is full of parables, that's all it is, and you worship a man as a god made from these parables.

@@markussone7334 The video further proves the authenticity and accuracy of the Holy Bible. My personal opinion though. God bless you in Jesus name.🙏🏾😇

@@markussone7334 prove your claim, bullshitter

Stephen Negley you are right. The truth always comes out. All the lies and deceit will be exposed.. my sister is doing a cruise to the Panama Canal. She mentioned yesterday that they passed several places where the water was red for no reason. I told her to read the Book of Revelation which mentions waters in several place would turn red. I told her these were all end time signs.. She gave me a peculiar laugh, one of disbelief.

RON wYATT LIED. hE DIDN;T FIND nOAHS aRK. a french explorer back in the early 1900's found the ark and wrote a book called "I found Noah's ark many decades before ron was born and peddling his hoax He also did NOT find the Ark of the Covenent because 2 Maccabees says the Ark will not be discovered until the End Times and it is hidden in Mt. Sinai where God gave the Jews the ten commands. He also lied about finding Jesus blood on his fake ark of covenent. Another truth that Sodom and Gomorrah was found by Biblical archaelogists. Ron even got in trouble because of his illegal trespass in Egypt. The guy was a lying con artist.

@@kathleenneuen7721 what a load of crap. There are bacteria that cause the rivers to be red. And YOUR version of Revelation is a lie. The End Times will not begin until Damascus is a ruinous heap as Isaiah 17 tells us.

Katherine McChesney I guess your Book of Revelation is a Catholic version, full of twisted truth or shall I use your phrase "a load of CRAP!!!!."

🙏👍👍👍

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity....

There exact believe it or not !

True but they were taken away. I've seen the original pictures by Ron Wyatt and they are quite amazing. Then, poof, gone.

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity....

Melvin Hunt :Just like the Bible, your statement is also true. Praise Yeshua 🙏🕎🕊✡🦁

@@GraftedOliveBranch praise Yeshua

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity....

The full video is "The Exodus Revealed" available at go2rpi.com

i do like this subject however i pressed dislike since i dont want to recive recomandtions of jesus..

@Stephen Negley i belive in god not in a man its one of the 10 commandments The newtestament is full of human errors Only the Torah is true.

THAT IS A LIE. wYATT WAS A CON ARTIST.

liar.

@@TheresaPowers ...No you dumb bitch, I'm not lying. Watch the video about the red sea crossing / revealing God's truth. IDIOT.

MGTOW SWORD you are right that this was identified but calling someone a bitch isn’t conducive to teaching. Would Jesus do that? Be respectful of others and guide, not insult x

@@TheresaPowers Well, we all lie, so... 😂

Ron Wyatt was a con artist. He did not make numerous discoveried.He also lied that Jesus blood appeared in a cave. He was one of those idiot SDAs.

​@@TheresaPowers You harboring some kind of hate towards the man aren't you?

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity.....

So true, but I like to see that even skeptics have reached this conclusion. Meaning I'm glad some people are still willing to be honest over their own biases. We sure know mainstream science isnt.

too be honest he wasnt even an Archiolgicist...

@@danielekslin3155 to be honest, he admitted to being an amateur archeologist however on this specific find he employed the help of a physicist from Los Alamos labs in new Mexico and a marine salvage expert amongst others. They spent 10 years looking over and making discoveries on the sight sending materials to labs to be tested(some in my home town so yes this is verifiable). After that 10 years the Turkish government tested the sight with a team of their own scientists who reached the same conclusion. The Turkish government were the ones who said it was confirmed to be noahs ark. So the fact was discovered by a man who didnt have an archeology degree and wasnt paid to be making these discoveries is irrelevant. In fact him not getting any money and not asking for any money for the discovery makes it hard to argue he had any motives to lie. Most "real " archeologists that have looked for the ark didnt understand that the account was written by moses who was raised by Egyptian royalty, meaning that the cubit used to describe the ark was the royal Egyptian cubit 20.62 inches making the ark 515.5ft long. Most people are looking for it based on the 18 inch hebrew cubit which hadn't even been established in the time of moses as there was no hebrew nation yet.

@@whatisdoneinthedarkwillbeb9204 Hello i appricate your replay; you might be right maybe the world is just not ready yet, if god would have want people to know he would make sure it will happen not just stay as a semi mystery.. about the cubits mesures you mentioned. its is true there was no hebrew nation back at the time. but there was an oral torah and we have proofs of it from the scripture when noah made an altar he only used "pure beasts" he couldnt have know which beast is pure and which is not without the oral torah sorry for my english btw

@@danielekslin3155 no worries I'm not one of those to worry about grammar on youtube anyway. You bring up some interesting points, but what my point was is if you research Ron or ever met the man, which unfortunately you cant because he passed away 21 years ago, he would tell you that's these are his findings and while he believes it is Noah's ark it's up to you to form your own opinion of what he has shown you. He was a pretty humble guy, his 1st museum was in the town about 45 minutes from me in Gatlinburg Tennessee. Some of the stuff found regardless of if it was the ark or not is truly amazing, petrified wood that was tested and dated to be around 4500 years old containing metal (possibly nails or some kind of fastener) in its metallic form which do not occur in nature like aluminum and titanium, shows people understood metal working long long before we are told they did. Inside the structure petrified animal droppings, petrified antlers and cat hair embedded in rock was found. There is a lot of good evidence, but I wont say that evidence always results in proof. I apologize if my comment seemed defensive, I thought you were more making the statement in order to claim that the flood didnt happen. I can definitely understand the scepticism of it being found though.

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity....

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity.....

Good luck with that

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity.....

Weee not allowed

CON ARTIST

@@TheresaPowers based on what facts? The fact you chose to dismiss him for no reason. I didn't say he was 100% accurate but a lot of his 'Cons' are now recognised as archeology now so not sure what your basing that on? Do tell, what your justification is, what you do etc I'd love to hear it?

how

The Saudis thought for sure Ron Wyatt & company were Israeili spies UNTIL a certain Saudi Prince took him out of jail and took Ron on a helicopter ride so that Ron would point out all the sites he had found. The prince was WOW'ED. And since then the REAL stuff in and around Mt. Sinai was fenced off by ROYAL DECREE. The Saudis also took away the concrete pedestal on their side of the crossing which King Soloman placed. The other pedestal on the Egyptian side of the crossing is still there!

AntandLou Cerowski the government don’t want them to go global. They want to kill the Christian religion not make people turn to god. This in an incredible discovery and they’ve not made it go global.

@@xavierp7783 the story of the exodus is from the bible.. not from the new testament.. actully there are many errors in the new testament that doesnt fit with old testament and that brings us to the next questions : does god make mistakes? or maybe the one who written the new testament made mistake?

@@HelloMF_7.62 how you know which type is the original new testament?you have thousands of versions.. Old testament -only 1 version EVEN after 3300 years..

@@danielekslin3155 The old testament is a shadow of what was to come. Jesus. And none of it contradicts anything. It's just that the coming of Jesus elevated the laws to a level where you need the Holy Spirit, that why Paul said, letter kills but Spirit gives life. Then Romans says, law is spiritual. And so now we do not perform any laws but live the laws spiritually. God makes no mistakes. It's just that people aren't open enough to read both the testaments together to see that the old testament was all about what's coming.

@@aakankshayadav695 answer me this simple quuestion : does the new testament was written by god/god approval?

Quite so. Vendyl Jones and others such as Ron Wyatt made such discoveries known for well over 30+ years now.

At 1:30 the narrator says in 1997, based on reports from other divers. The year 1997 was 26 years ago. This team never claimed they found this.

@@terryhuber327 so why didn’t they give credit where credit is due?

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity.....

Who cares who found it, I am actually glad that someone else is looking at it so we can remove the stigma of Ron Wyatt’s name from it. More people looking is better

Faith?...try moving a mountain with your faith...and then get back to me on that

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity.....

the Egyptian gov't will not allow the removal of these ancient objects. did you not see the golden wheel shining bright(no coral), if not look up another video. i saw it.

@@lrcavalli290 You poor child.

@@NuclearMango. You confused adult

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity. . .

Metal has been detected in the coral formations.

Oooh yeah, the thought just came to me as well! There has to be some still buried if they haven't decomposed already.

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity....

@@Michael-pn5lp What's your TL:DR version? You appear to speculate an enormous amount of variables.

@@jamiesmith4293 read the Exodus account yourself and take note of the day stops - no speculation, it's clear as day in the text.

@@jamiesmith4293 The Gulf of Suez extended further north in antiquity - it's been mapped out well into the fresh water marshy lake reed area that drained into it. Proving the three day journey to the crossing point, the fourth day crossing during the night and celebration on the opposite shore for the rest of the fourth day: Proving the Exodus Gulf of Suez Crossing: “And they departed from Rameses in the first month, on the fifteenth day of the first month; on the morrow after the passover the children of Israel went out with an high hand (“from Rameses”) in the sight of all the Egyptians.” (Numbers 33:3) For THREE DAYS they travelled into the wilderness, well within reach of Pharaoh’s army: The 15th Abib therefore was not then and is not now a weekly Sabbath day. 1st day 2nd day 3rd day The 15th Abib they all travelled and camped at Succoth (see Exodus 12:37). The 16th Abib they travelled again until afternoon and camped at Etham (see Exodus 13:20). The 17th Abib Yahweh instructed them to turn away from exiting Egypt eastwards above the top end of the Red Sea (Gulf of Suez), and to travel further down the west side within Egypt proper and camp at Pihahiroth (see Exodus 14:2). Only now Pharaoh thought that they were going to actually try and escape Egypt, but had somehow made a wrong turn (see Exodus 14:3-9). Leaving Egypt was never on Pharaoh’s agenda ! Enclosed here between the desert mountains and the sea, Pharaoh’s spies told him the Israelites were trapped and he personally lead his army in to guarantee their return to bondage. Starting the 4th day 18th Abib NIGHT Yahweh parted the Red Sea and the Israelites passed through safely: “And the angel of God, which went before the camp of Israel, removed and went behind them; and the pillar of the cloud went from before their face, and stood behind them:” (Exodus 14:19). This “angel of God” was Christ Himself: “Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; And did all eat the same spiritual meat; And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ” (1 Corinthians 10:1-4). He is our Shepherd - the Stone of Israel - see Genesis 49:24 ! “And Moses STRECHED FORTH HIS HAND OVER THE SEA, and the sea returned to his strength when the morning appeared; and the Egyptians fled against it; and Yahweh overthrew the Egyptians in the midst of the sea. And the waters returned, and covered the chariots, and the horsemen, and all the host of Pharaoh that came into the sea after them; there remained not so much as one of them. But the children of Israel walked upon dry land in the midst of the sea; and the waters were a wall unto them on their right hand, and on their left. THUS Yahweh saved Israel THAT DAY out of the hand of the Egyptians; and Israel saw the Egyptians dead upon the sea shore. And Israel saw that great work which Yahweh did upon the Egyptians: and the people feared Yahweh, and believed Yahweh, and his servant Moses” (Exodus 14:27-31). “Then sang Moses and the children of Israel this song unto Yahweh… And Miriam the prophetess, the sister of Aaron, took a timbrel in her hand; and all the women went out after her with timbrels and with dances. And Miriam answered them, Sing ye to Yahweh, for he hath triumphed gloriously; the horse and his rider hath he thrown into the sea.” (Exodus 15:1-21). “And they remembered that God was their rock, and the high God their redeemer . . . And smote all the firstborn in Egypt; the chief of their strength in the tabernacles of Ham: But made his own people to go forth like sheep, and guided them in the wilderness like a flock. And he led them on safely, so that they feared not: but the sea overwhelmed their enemies.” (Psalms 78:35,51-53) This 18th was a great “day of gladness”, salvation, celebration and thanksgiving ! This 18th according to the Dead Sea Scrolls solar calendar, was the weekly Sabbath day ! This 18th Sabbath day, Christ our Shepherd/Stone/Rock herded the whole flock of Israel out of the Egyptian pit ! (N.B. see Matthew 12:8-13). This 18th was the weekly Sabbath day on Yahweh's Heavenly Calendar, and so they would not have travelled any further that day, because they were already out of the Egyptian pit and it was fitting to celebrate and praise Yahweh, as they did for the rest of that day on the opposite shore of the Red Sea ! After three days journey across Egypt to the Red Sea - this 4th day 18th Abib Sabbath day salvation of Israel is also that 18th Abib Sabbath Day Resurrection of Christ - Lord of the Sabbath Day - after three full nights and three full days in the dark tomb: “He will swallow up death in victory; and the Lord GOD will wipe away tears from off all faces; and the rebuke of his people shall he take away from off all the earth: for Yahweh hath spoken it.” (Isaiah 25:8) So Moses and Yahweh didn’t lie - they did travel THREE DAYS into the Egyptian wilderness to sacrifice, and by the end of the third days travel they encamped at the Red Sea: That 18th NIGHT starting the 4th day, Pharaoh, his chariots, horses and army were all sacrificed in the Red Sea. Death for Israel was literally swallowed up. Pharaoh had no idea that he himself and his oppressive army were to be Yahweh’s sacrifice (sacrificial Red Sea slaughter/feast in divine judgment) The Red Sea Gulf of Suez, "tongue of the Egyptian sea", as the Bible calls it, literally swallowed them up and the fowls of the air and monsters of the deep had a great feast ! Now there was no Pharaoh to return to and Israel was free to go !

@@jamiesmith4293 I originally looked at a a promising site that is also possibly within the THREE day range to a crossing point. It is at Adabiya, with rough 600m above sea level terrain immediately behind the shore. According to naval charts there is a shallower diagonal NSE possible land bridge to Scanour Resort - on the opposite shore jutting into the Suez Gulf. This possible crossing point could be within the THREE day/maximum-42-hour travel cut-off to the crossing site. The only incredulous thing to me is that everyone is almost deliberately overlooking the stated Biblical maximum of 42 hour travel limit to the crossing point. If they can't stay within that limit, then their theories are nonsense. As I said, according to THAT, the whole Gulf of Aqaba is out of the question. ​From midnight on the 15th Abib to 6am is 6 hours. Then from 6am to 6pm is another 12 hours. From 6am on the 16th Abib to 6pm is another 12 hours. From 6am on the 17th to 6pm is another 12 hours: Giving 42 hours in total. Don't you find that number Biblically very familiar ?????

Curt Christensen Jethro, Moses father in law was a Midianite and he came out to see him after the victory with the Amalekites. The Amalekites were nomadic and from where did Jethro travel to meet Moses with his wife and kids? I’m not sure I would fully accept the crossing at the Sea of Aqaba so much as better understand why it seems to be largely discredited and rejected by the scholars. What is also interesting to note is that those holding to the “traditional route” also point out that there is no archaeological evidence of the Israelites sojourn in the wilderness along this “traditional route!” We understand the scriptures saying that their garments and shoes didn’t wear out so perhaps there was very little discarded and this would be the explanation? And speaking of the “scholars,” they often dismiss the inspiration, authority, and the SUFFICIENCY of scripture and often appeal to scientific evidence rather than acknowledging supernatural or divine intervention which does not have to make any scientific sense whatsoever!

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity.....

Because they’d probably get arrested lol

Because they said that any wooden artefact would disappear over time, leaving only the coral that grew on the original wooden artefact and the coral would sometimes grow in the shape of its host.

Take a look at Ron Wyatt

God reveals everything in his own time, then it is up to you to believe or not. He has given us the scriptures to read for a reason!!!!!

If they xrayed the coral, they would know that God is real.... duhhhhh, now we can’t have the people knowing the truth. Cause a great shift in lifestyles would happen.

​@@markbartolo6545 Ron was excommunicated from his own church due to fraud.

Thinking logically: Three days travel to the Red Sea crossing 15th,16th,17th Abib. 18th Abib weekly Sabbath taken out of the Egyptian pit through the Red Sea and celebrating on the opposite shore. 19th, 20th, 21st and arriving during 22nd Abib at the bitter waters of Marah. Note the 3 day - 4th day pattern ! The three day distance they travelled before the crossing, should be three quarters of the four day distance they travelled after the crossing to get to Marah. This should help eliminate incorrect proposed Red Sea crossing points. The north end of the Gulf of Suez is still the most likely crossing point - possibly in the area that is now dried up, since the Gulf of Suez is proven to have extended much further north in antiquity. i.e. travelling 9 days distance in three days to get to the crossing, and then travelling 4 days distance in 4 days to Marah after the crossing, doesn't make sense. The same applies to other proposed crossing sites ! On the first day of the 15th they left soon after midnight and travelled to Succoth, giving a maximum of 18 hours travel. They must have rested overnight after 18 hours travel. The second afternoon they "encamped" in Etham. After turning away from leaving Egypt, the third afternoon they got to Pihahiroth where the crossing took place. The Straits of Tiran are about 500 kilometers from Rameses - it just can't be done ! It's about 400km to the top of the Gulf of Aqaba, which is just as unlikely a three day journey for a multitude of men, women and children with herds of livestock. So the whole Gulf of Aqaba is ruled out, leaving only the top of the Gulf of Suez as the likely site - probably the dry bed of the sea that is proven to have extended further north in antiquity.....

hello according to the Book of Exodus all the gold from chariots of the egyptian army was washed ashore and the israeli people collected it and became rich

@@danielekslin3155 Can you give me the chapter/verse cause I can't find it. Thanks

@@OIE82 yes forgive me its my bad. its not written in Exodus its from the Oral Torah

@@danielekslin3155 gotcha. Thanks

You actually have a valid point. You know that in those days the Pharaoh would have his signet or seal stamped on his military weapons, so that should be the next step to validate its authenticity. Also carbon dating isnt accurate so we cant go off that, but science is admitting a lot of things that occured in the bible. If athiest dont want to believe, thats not our problem to try to convince them, we can only share the truth, not force it on them. Theyre athiest for a reason, God already knew from the beginning who would believe & who wouldn't.