*perfect*

Get out of my head!

@Dakota Guillermo Is this some meme joke that I'm missing, or are you just some asshole who wants to spy on their girlfriend?

It was a magic typeball

@@hetmanjz, I hope his girlfriend finds out.

I doubt it. They planned a competition. And they planned the mistakes. The guest even said she knew the paper was not in the typewriter, but she kept typing. As far as the hand shift? That had to be intentional, as a world record typist would have felt her hand out of position. That would also explain why it didn't look like she was typing that fast. (The assistant appeared to by typing faster.) It was an awkward position for her.

​@@sophocles1198she was just a liar.

@@sophocles1198 She just made a crazy claim that she couldn't back up.

I only graduated because of VHS recorders

Me too back when it was on at 1230 pm where I live

Same here, don't care for any late night comics now.

Then you will remember the pamphlet- "The Joys of Tedious, Menial Tasks." Digging ditches these days, are we?

It was Jr High for me . i never missed Carson & Letterman

@@vintage-red-carpetmasonic-38 The caps lock on your typewriter is stuck

I'm responding to you from the future. A lot will change since you wrote this comment 4 years ago.. The reason you won't see this in 2021 is because this would be seen as depicting women as submissive mindless secretaries doing menial labor for rich powerful white men. I know that sounds crazy and you probably think I'm kidding, but just you wait!😫

@@edited7382 They will have guest that do "private" things online for other men, and feel more and more degraded as they drift into "excorting" and later pron, before leaving that, when age makes it an "impossible" task to earn a living for them instead, whitout having any other "skills". I'm not kidding either...

@@CONEHEADDK Wow, "excorting" and "pron". Are those jobs from the Jetsons?

@@tedparkinson6892So what you're saying is, that you don't understand the meaning.? Or are you just a weak fcuk, that needs to deminish others, to feel less crappy about your self.?

@@CONEHEADDK Just a joke dude. Smile. Take care. Chill.

I was taught, or I picked up on somehow, tapping my leg/knee as a metronome. Helps with multiplication too. How I learned my multiplication tables as a kid. Slowly pacing myself faster. I do it when typing fast, or like, I'm trying to type fast, you know.

140 on a manual typewriter is INSANE!

Competitive typing was VERY big from 1900-1950, with different brands endorsed by the champion typists. Albert Tangora was the best, around 200 wpm on a manual. Millions of working-class people took typing and shorthand as a ticket into white-collar careers.

Mimeographs had been around since before 1900 and certainly in heavy use by WWII. So I'm not sure how much "brute force copying" had to be done by typing things over from scratch ... ?

@@androidchannel309 you aren't going to bother to make a master to make less than 10 copies of something, given how fast these women were at typing. I wouldn't be surprised if the threshold was closer to 50 copies before they used a DITTO machine or whatever they had. The Xerox copier was the big breakthrough, which came later.

Thanks, Jack!

part of your lexicon?

Well stated.

That is a massive claim that he could have saved that TV disaster

ANY show would have had her do a demonstration. The competition with a fast typing assistant was an interesting twist. But the mistakes were obviously planned, with some knowledge of the guest, who was told to play along, or type along ...

​@@sophocles1198​​@sophocles1198 she was just a liar.

It would still be popular today. The current stable of hosts are politically-motivated puppets and smart-asses.

The younger David Letterman would have mocked the older David Letterman..... (David lost his mojo as he aged)

I once saw a show of his where the guest was Jeff Dunham. Apparently Letterman had to read some blurb about Dunham receiving some ventriloquist award and the look he gave the camera clearly said "Who gives a fuck?" Had me rolling. Dave dogs everybody.

I lost it more after each time they played it! XD

@@calebhunter7440 that final close up just on her glasses... man we had it good back then!

I wouldn't say perfect. Barbara blackburn achieves Guiness world record by typing on a computer, not on a type writer. She might have forgotten how to type properly on a type writer since she works on computers for a long time. However the show never address this issue.

Absurdly perfect? Or perfectly absurd? DUUUUNNNNNNN dun dun duuun dun dun DUUUUUUUUNNNNNNN!

@@tyrellwreleck4226 She may have been unaccustomed to loading a sheet of paper, but the use of a typewriter instead of a computer keyboard played no role in the displacement of her right hand. Personally, I'm inclined to attribute both errors to nerves.

@@davidlevy706: Blackburn could've been accustomed to using an ergonomic Dvorak computer keyboard with a gap between the key groups for the left and right hands. Search for images of "ergonomic Dvorak computer keyboards" and you may see examples of them. Her hands may have settled upon the normal position where they would be on her personal keyboard. I wanted the naval cryptologist to state whether or not Blackburn's work would've otherwise been correct, if she hadn't shifted her right hand over by one key position. Then, we could've gotten her typing rate and error rate (if not for the right hand misplacement).

@@tyrellwreleck4226 that was an IBM Selectric, it was the gold standard of typewriters for years. She assuredly banged out tens of thousands of pages on one of those things, no way she forgot. No way.

Computers made typewriters obsolete. However, a physical typewriter is still useful if you have to type text on to a paper form.

@@jeopardy60611 Get a printer

@@andyu69 But a printer can only type out all the text on the form at once, and it has to be layed out. With a typewriter, you can position the form on each field and then type on it.

@@jeopardy60611 depends on the printer kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eKeZZrpmm9DbqXU.html

@@jeopardy60611 Not can, have to:-)

How many wpm is Paul on his keyboard?

wecontrolthevideo - rEaLLy?? 🙄

I just realized 👏🏼

That's what these ladies claim... they "DO GOOD TIME... TYPING..."

I was born a month after this aired, but I can appreciate good comedy where I see it.

The 80’s were great, the county wasn’t under attack by left wing nut jobs and illegals at our boarder

Agree. I learned on the old upright antiques and preferred the IBM typing ball before the computer age. Some typewriters were faster than others and I could really fly as a keypunch operator which punched out tiny squares on a card. Learned that as a h.s. grad embarking on my first job. Paid well. Sorry Barbara, you were not the world's fastest typist.

@@vikkinicholson5880 At one time I had a Brother electric typewriter at home with two balls. One was a script font that I used for personal letters. Really loved that machine. After I got a computer and printer, of course, I had no use for it and so it was sold.

@@vikkinicholson5880 Data entry is different from what you would be typing normally for a business.

Exactly....I was taught the same as you and still can type without looking at the keys

Also, a nice rendition of Glass Onion when they went to break. ☺️

​@@TheClash122That's Drive My Car, not Glass Onion but Beatles nonetheless

@@BonJoviBeatlesLedZep You’re right, they are doing Drive My Car going into the first break. I didn’t notice that. But going into the second break at 9:20, they are doing Glass Onion.

@@vintage-red-carpetmasonic-38 If you watched the video, they did the test a second time, with paper.

@@vintage-red-carpetmasonic-38 He administered (on camera, in audience view) two typing tests; for the second, he put paper in both typewriters.

@@vintage-red-carpetmasonic-38 Is that you, Larry "Bud" Melman, back from the afterlife to heckle?

@@vintage-red-carpetmasonic-38 WHY ARE YOU YELLING.

Without bevoming obnoxious which is the true gold!

Me too!!!!!!!

It was actually worth watching back in those days. Nowadays I can’t handle hardly any television due to the blatant and terrible agenda being crammed down our throats.

@@caseytebo7147 Agreed 100%

I remember my dad having him covered in sponges, jumping into a tank to float or something? And another where the camera rotated around upside down and back as the show went on. Like one rotation over the entire hour.

@Brix Broox I used to watch his morning show too. Or at least tried to whenever I could. He was brilliant in his early years of hosting. But I haven't watched late-night television in about fifteen years.

Thanks, I agree. I've read many times that the layout of the keyboard was due to the limitations of the machinery. The letters had to be arranged to deliberately slow down the typist. I've thought about learning DVORAK but it's a pretty big commitment! My brother did, though. He's a programmer. Both of us have had problems with our hands/wrists due to keyboard overuse, and apparently DVORAK helps with that.

Yes, at first they were just arbitrary, hence the problem was discovered and resolved as you said, in 1932 as SHE said

Yes, otherwise E would be on home row

I have read that lately, those old tapes of tv programs (and the commercials between) are worth quite a bit. I wish I had known that before I threw a bunch out because I am moving. I read the article right after that. Very cool find, just know you have some possible money in your hands.

@@BlackSeranna I've watched a few reselling (Pawn shop type) shows and am amazed at how much collectors pay for some old electronics. I still have a manual Smith Corona typewriter, 8-Track player and cassettes, turntable record player with records, VCR recorders/players with boxes of VHS tapes and s DVD recorder and I don't know what else. They are all in mint condition and working. Glad I didn't throw them out so hope my kids have the sense to sell them for what they are now worth instead of taking to the dump. My kids are from the throw away generation though.

@@islandgal500 you need to talk to your kids. I can tell mine aren’t interested in my stuff so I may need to find a home for most stuff before I die. It’s a shame that my kids can’t tell what has value or not, but it wasn’t for lack of me trying. I have a painting from France. I think I will gift it to my little brother. I don’t want to die and my kids think it is garbage.

@@BlackSeranna I've recorded anything of value, except the electronics and old equipment, in computer files that I will eventually print out for my kids. They have a description, approximate worth, and some family history about each item. I've separated the items that I want to leave to each adult child because I know what they are interested in and will want to keep. The electronics I will note that collectors are still interested in them because that I figure will just be dumped. I have a lot of antiques that I got from my European Grandmother when I was still a teen and they were old then. Interesting stories behind those things! I'm glad I can appreciate them in my home right now.

Why would your friends finds that weird? You must have lived around some duds. I was staying up to watch Mary Hartman Mary Hartman when I was 10.

Lmaooooo

I knew there was skullduggery right there

You can clearly see that she's a typewriter cheat just by the look in her eyes.

They were beautiful.

I started out with our Smith Corona (non-electric) that I still have in storage and then in school progressed to that IBM electric. After school I took a Business Machines and office procedures college course for 6 months while I was waiting for my real course in something else to start. One girl and I took turns in being the fastest typists in the class. I'm still chuckling about those obsolete machines we had to learn - Dictaphone, Keypunch, Burroughs Bookkeeping contraption... It was so easy to transition to computer keyboards because your fingers can fly over the keys. You know you are old when you've gone through a lot of technology. Also had reel-to-reel music, 8-Tracks, turntable record player, cassettes... Funny thing is that I kept that old but working equipment and now they are collector's items. Too bad that doesn't go for humans too.

I loved the sound it made when you really got into your typing groove. Something sadly lacking on a computer keyboard.

I found a Selectric for sale in a thrift store in AZ last year. I tried to lift it, and see if I wanted to bring it back to WA with me. Nope. I couldn't lift it. It was actually heavier than my cast-iron Smith-Corona from the '40s that we finally bolted to a platform with a very heavy spring to be able to drop into a cabinet back in the '60s. I remember how much easier it was to use the Selectric than the S-C. I was pissed off that I had to learn to use a computer in college. I was a key-punch operator to earn my tuition. Around then, I decided I'd rather be dead than spend my life typing out the words of other people, mostly men who had nothing important to say, or just printing out shit like personal data. I went into electronics, learned to solder, design, and get out of the office. Never looked back. I was pissed off when I had to learn to use a pc later in life, but look at where we are now. sigh No escaping it.

That is true, loved that machine!

I was a programmer at Aetna Life and Casualty, the largest commercial user of IBM equipment in the Free World in 1973. For a while we used IBM Selectrics as remote input terminals to an IBM time-sharing system. Eventually they were replaced with faster, smaller, quieter units on our desktop and the Selectrics were relegated to alcoves on each floor and used as low-volume printers. Therefore the duty cycle went from a couple of hours of humans typing in a day to literally eight to ten hours of continuous output...which is not what they were designed for. The machines kept breaking down from the load and IBM had to have a four person staff just going around fixing the machines. IBM kept telling Aetna that they were not supposed to be used that way, and Aetna just kept saying there was nothing in the Service Level Agreement that said they could not be used that way. I still have an APL ball from one of those machines.....but I agree they were great for their time.

I don't know what this says about me, but I found all of these stories fascinating. My top speed was 107 wpm on the Selectric, but I could get into the 80s on an old Royal. After 3 decades of computer keyboard use, I entered a typing competition a few years ago. On the old Smith Corona, the best I could do was mid-30s. The Selectric was often too touch sensitive imho.

@@catholicdad 107 is VERY impressive! I used to think I was pretty good typing in the 90s. Now my daughters make fun of my "typing" on a mobile. They use both hands but for some reason I can't get into the habit. I'm still 100 times faster than their dad who takes 5 minutes to text back "OK." 😁

She was quite hurt by it apparently and often spoke of how David Letterman had made a spectacle of her. It's unfortunate because she was clearly nervous and made a simple, and forgiveable, mistake. She was tested again that year and was able to set a world record that stood until Guiness eliminated the category. RIP, Barbara. You were the best.

@@gklinger It's what Letterman does, dog people. She never claimed to be a performer. Her skill lied in typing fast in a calm office setting, and was proven through multiple evaluations.

@@gklinger letterman could be kind of a jerk

Battle of the Barbs! And the band was playing the melody of “Barbara Ann.”

@@gklinger Putting your hand in the wrong position is not a simple mistake for the world's best typist. She also blamed it on the machine.

His show used to be brilliant. He was one of a kind, and then got tired with "Will it float" and dropping shit off the roof. Damn, I felt sorry for him by then.

I think she was a plant and was told to do it, otherwise she would've noticed when she was typing that her hand would fall off the edge on one side looking for a key.

I have to admit, I laughed at the investigation more than I thought I would. Funny stuff.

50 subs for nezuko vids The hell is wrong with you?

I agree. I loved NBC Letterman. I quit watching shortly after he went to CBS, when the show became a poor imitation of itself.

@@Lopfff Yeah, I did too. I think the problem was that when he move to CBS and ran against Leo's Tonight Show, they had to cater to an older audience that didn't care for the old NBC format (ie. odd ball routines, sketches and guests). So his show just became a duller version of The Tonight Show with a couple segments kept over from NBCs Late Night (like the top ten). His CBS show always seemed to me to be gutted of all the off the wall weirdness that was the core of his Late Night show.

Yes, the show tanked for me at CBS. And with the constant applause for weak jokes, it smacks of "sweetening" like with laugh tracks.

@@ke0nc Yes definitely. The old NBC Letterman show was edgy. You got the feeling that it could be cancelled any day. He had odd guests like Brother Theodore & Harvey Pekar, coupled with bizarre off the wall sketches. By contrast, his CBS show was essentially the Tonight Show -- dull jokes, safe sketches and run of the mill guests (Ok, Ill admit, there were a few good off location sketches he did on CBS but they were mainly in the early years).

Further proof this was an inside job

No

unreal you would do that. now you know why your life is a wreck.

@@rickt1866 He's a CEO now.

@@johnnymittle yeah, CEO of bullsh*t

They could hear the creaks in the floor, but they didn't hear the TV? Or the laughing?

I find it odd that anyone naming themselves SGT. Thunder Cock would be so endeared by the sweetness of these two women. unless you're into that sort of thing or you are truly a gentleman with just odd naming and couldn't progress past sergeant as it may inhibit further giggling at your name.

@@andrewmarinelly5838 funny comment

My dad fixed typewriters so I grew up helping him since I could hold a screwdriver, and later repaired some myself. Loved the things!

Reminds me of typing class back in the 80s.

YES they did!

Thank you! I was just thinking last night after I watched this, how late night hosts pale in comparison to Letterman, second only to Johnny in my opinion. I would place current guys behind Carson, Letterman,, Dick Cavett Joey Bishop...

Conan got up to plenty of silly/funny stuff, arguably just as funny as Letterman's NBC show, albeit Letterman is the original in this vein. I enjoy Kimmel too. The rest of them are lame AF. I can't even watch Fallon or Colbert.

@@OMGWTFLOLSMHColbert is the absolute worst.

Agree, but at the end of the Late Show, David was becoming a kind of a Bozo himself.

The show was unique and unpredictable when Letterman was on NBC but it become boring and unfunny when he went to CBS.

I remember him getting catapulted against a wall wearing a velcro suit and yes, he stuck there or another time in a cereal filled bathtub and him floating there with milk up to his chin. He was never mean. Always decent, he didn't perform character assassination as some hacks do now.

Neither have I.

@@Joemurph10 She misquotes Letterman badly, and she doesn't address the controversy at all. I find the whole affair quite enigmatic.

It was just a bit for the show. She was likely told to mess up and play along so they could drag it out into a silly controversy.

@@matthewpierce8250 He was a comedian. She was a paid guest. The corporate lords ruled everything. Television and KZfaq and everything you see, feel, hear, touch, etc., is an illusion. Does it matter? Enjoy your ice cream while it's on your plate, or watch it go away. Be happy while you're living, for you're a long time dead.

Yeah, I don't think the whole thing was a bit. Most, if not all talk shows are structured and planned so everything fits in the time slot and it's entertaining. Most of the time the guests are aware of the questions beforehand so they can answer eloquently and have something prepared. I don't think this was planned and they just went with it for comedic value. But, (hang on, let me put my conspiracy hat on) I can almost guarantee that IBM saw the first episode and wanted to make sure that it was clear that it wasn't the typewriter at fault because those typewriters would've been big businesses in those days.

@Fugp Basis Assuming this wasn't a Kaufman style bit, why did Blackburn move her hand? She obviously did it intentionally. Perhaps she was not expecting to have a competition against Gaines and just thought she'd be typing alone for Dave. Gaines did walk out with her own typewriter. I submit that Blackburn was upset by having this competition spring upon her, intentionally didn't load the paper, and then moved her hand over in protest.

What's the first?

Sorry wrong one

You're kind of off the point...of this topic.

@@tryithere seems like a good analogy to most people maybe your the weirdo

@@tdowell8615 You're.

@@tdowell8615 You don't seem to catch concepts very well.

@@tryithere You’re the one that thinks a perfectly fine analogy is off topic weirdo. It’s because you’re triggered by someone talking about guns if I had to guess.

Isn't it funny how one little thing can change your life forever? I took typing lessons when I had a Smith-Corona that had been built in the 1940s. Talk about repetitive stress syndrome! Carpal tunnel syndrome! shit I had stronger fingers than my father, who was a laborer. A computer is so nothing in comparison. Duing my high-school senior year, they got the electric typewriters, from IBM, with the interchangeable balls. Whew! Big time technology! I was a whiz for a while, and then, I discovered that I never wanted to work in an office. lol Now, I don't know how fast I type, but it's certainly not as fast as I can think or read. And, fuck it. I don't have to prove myself in any marketplace ever again. Funny, when I saw Rich Hall on QI the first time, I thought, "He looks familiar." lol Good for him. Billie Holiday taught him a lesson.

I would have seen it on my VCR I was either sleeping or working at this time. And yes I remember both of these broadcasts. :)

No, the design of the qwerty keyboard is designed to cause alternate use of the typist's hands, which both speeds up typing and prevents hangups. Pressing keys next to each other isn't faster.

I saw this live too and totally remember it!

You saw the live taping.

@@APT420 I saw it on the original day when it was first broadcast. So live to the TV viewing audience watching NBC that night.

@@APT420 Right. Late Night was recorded at 5 PM Eastern time I believe and broadcast 7 and a half hours later. So, yes, not really live.

Larry "Bud" Melman's "Toast on a stick"

Me too lol

@tinwoods No, he was just making a point, which doesn't mean he missed the other point.

from the board reveal at the end it seams to show 66 words. at 9:47 he says the shows Barbra has about 50 words.

@@6zwbob it was the other Barbara, one which was sitting to the right

thats what i was wondering.

looked about average typing skill

Not 3 times faster than the production assistant though.

@@Marc83Aus Not really defending her, but for all we know, she could have been retired for years prior to this episode airing. She may not have realized her time away from daily practice would have had that much impact on her performance. Until someone beats her Guinness Book record, she will retain her title, but I seriously doubt she could do it again.

Fewer mistakes, perhaps. Less? She made a very great mistake in misplacing her hand. What's the difference between mistyping a letter here and there because of misplacing your finger and mistyping half of your letters because of misplacing your hand? The former is ledgible...

68 WPM is very slow for a pro typist. My best was 110. I also very much doubt she could type 200 WPM, not possible

@@xnetpc She retired in 2002, and died in 2008. She set the Guinness Word Record in the same year as her Letterman appearance, so she was obviously at the peak of her ability around this time.

I'm pretty sure she is.

That evil genius played the long game.

She was still considered the World's Fastest Typist in 2005. She died in 2008.

@@johnlux6635 The uploader should add that info to the video description.

I guess she was the Bill Buckner of typists.

This is false. It can be easily seen by the fact that QWERTY places E and R next to each other despite that letter pair being the fourth most common in English. See "On the Prehistory of QWERTY" by Koichi Yasuoka and Motoko Yasuoka for more.

@@stevenrumbalski687 Then those letters would be in the right side middle row to be struck by the index and middle fingers.

@@kenchristie9214 Once your hand has moved up to the E the R is adjacent. They will occur in as fast a succession as they would on the home row.

@@stevenrumbalski687 You obviously no very little about manual typewriters. Key jams often occurred when typing too fast. Barbara Blackburn was using a "golf ball" electric typewrite which allows higher typing speeds.

The qwerty keyboard layout was invented by George L Qwerty in 1864. I’m sure that’s just a coincidence...

From the link provided on that Wiki page: Blackburn claims that in Dave’s opening remark he said, "No doubt Ms. Blackburn is a very nice lady, but she has to be the biggest fraud and con artist in the world.” Pure fiction. Dave said no such thing.

Guinness book of world records has to be the most bullshit sources to base your claim off of, considering one can easily pay to get records NOWADAYS, much less a few decades ago. Also, that claim in the Guinness Book of World Records literally does not exist. I'm not kidding. There is no record of that 212 claim anywhere, and somehow this myth has persisted, always citing a phantom Guinness record. Barbara is a complete con artist and uses fabricated claims as evidence to build more evidence. Imagine if she had not gone on to be exposed in a head to head on Letterman. She can easily claim that she "proved" herself on Letterman and live television

⁠@@dongillerhe said she could be a world-champion con artist.

I'd rather watch paint dry. Or golf even.

"were"

Comedy is oppressive now

@@PedroHernandez-uy3pi Amen, my friend.

dawww do they hurt your feewings now? maybe you should have an earlier bed time.

@Sam Thomas are you ok there samwich my dude, you seem offended, did our opion on comedy make you feel oppressed there wooly sammoth

If you play it backwards, the woman typed "I'm holding Dave's puppy 🐶 hostage and he gets it if I don't get 1 million dollars in small bills".

I saw Conan in the same studio... did it look bigger when you watched it on TV? I guess would be the reverse as I imagined that it looked bigger

@@mem1701movies I saw Conan there too. I think of it in reverse--you could see how relatively tight the studio seemed in person, whereas I had imagined it was bigger when watching it on TV (are we saying the same thing? I think so). Same at SNL. I've lived in NYC for 27 years, and the truth is, most spaces are tight here.

I remember this from 1985 as well. It was just so damned hilarious!

@@PittsburghMarky One of the incredible things about this show is how they could take something as mundane as typing contest and somehow make it the funniest thing on television that week.

@@scottlarson1548 I know. That seemed to be the design. I also remember they had the typists type baseball's balk rule. This is memorable because a year or two later Letterman joked publicly before an NBC baseball telecast the sport needed more balks. Then damned if in 1988 MLB didn't decree more balks be called! I was in Three Rivers Stadium the night Jim Gott set a major league record that season by committing three balks in an inning!

And, I'm about 8 years older than you. I remember when electric typewriters replaced the one I had that weighed 40 pounds, and gave me "Indian wrestling" kind of strength. Good times. lol Love my soft-touch keyboards with instant correction now.

I'm about two years older. I'm really glad I took typing (in grade 8 or grade 9). Being able to touch type served me well when I started using computers. Having learned on a manual typewriter, it took me years to quit snapping my wrist and pounding on the keys with electric typewriters and later computers.

basically turns out she was a fraud without any records and was employed by a rival company to the standard qwerty keyboard

That was about it for me too, on a manual typewriter in typing class pre 1970. Computers and or electric typewriters more than doubled that speed.

That's still pretty good... it's perfectly fine for anyone in today's computer age. I also took typing in high-school and have been consistently typing almost everyday since for the last 40 years, and I can still only crank out about 45 words per minute on my best day.

Typing is the most useful class I took in high school. I still use those skills today. I took math and science, too, but since I'm an engineer I don't use those too much.

I never knew this! Thanks for sharing I think this is pretty meat

The Selectrics didn’t have bumps on the home keys.

Nope. She WAS just a con artist. Or rather marketing a product without notifying Late Night or NBC. Karl Jobst made an analysis video about her exposing her as just being there to market DVORAK. The rights holder to DVORAK just wrote Guinness and they added her into the book.

Nice.

Did you know her?

@@jackleonardo2167 He's suggesting she got murdered by the show.

Same as Seinfeld - It's all about nothing. Very hard to do, that.

That what you get from watching this? How bout "I can really see what people mean when they talk about how great Letterman was"

@@MarvinMonroe but people don’t say that?

I’ve uploaded all of the anniversary shows, including the second.

When we had only one set, you mean? lol