No

Yes, and they withdraw them too when they see an unjust awarding. I'm speaking of other cases here.

A Nobel Prize was given posthumously a few years ago.

yes.....fix the issue regardless of when it is enacted....

Yes. Obviously.

watson and creek did actually decript the molecular structure of DNA which was a world changing thing and not espeically brilliant but nobel winning... Frankling did very hard work that imaged a helix structure, which was also nobel winning, and the should have won it all three. The nobel kindof sucks because it is pop-science and doesn't look at a problem as a complex teamwork but as the scientist that did the final leap.

Such as the people who took "her" photo... Ever heard of them? They were men.

Men in general are Better at wonning Nobel prices i mean its 95%

The big difference between men and women is that when it comes to acts of over all geniuses men do not need women to accomplish amazing inventions discoveries cures for diseases etc women could never have built the modern world just by themselves but men can and have done it all and have never needed the help of women and this modern feminist push for women equal rights is actually damaging to society women have a nauseating habit of vastly over rating themselves and let me give you just one example of how ruinous feminist equality is Birmingham city council has become bankrupt because of the deluded hostile rampant anti male doctrine of feminism i should know i was the union boss of the binmen who were the sacrificial lambs slaughtered on the altar of feminism that has resulted in bankruptcy and finally all women is go on about is being the equals of men yet men aspire to up there with the gods we split the atom put a man on the moon Beethoven and so much else that has benefited everyone on this planet yet we are hated and despised for doing these things resentful hateful jealousy that what lies at the heart of these sentiments the fact is she had ample opportunity to recognize what Crick and Watson saw and she failed! i often wonder why one of the greatest geniuses that ever lived never bothered with women but you will have to guess that one! ha ha

Most Nobel prizes are in fields of fundamental science where patents are not awarded.

@@sdutta8 Barak Obama won the Nobel prize for peace...unfortunately, Nobel prize is not how things are measured Have a good day

There is an article: Rosalind Franklin, The Dark Horse of DNA by Sara Davila Give it to Stephen Spielberg - Franklin was jewish

Controversy is mostly about her work being shared without her consent as Watson/Crick were unlikely to discover the structure without Photo 51. Watson himself admitted to it in his book. Her research partner and other university staff unfortunately lacked the foresight to keep it from competitors by either bragging about it or trying to perhaps sabotage her.

@@jonathanvillegas7570But Franklin did NOT take photo 51. Raymond Gosling did. Why so much talk about Franklin not getting the Noble Prize and nothing about Gosling not getting it?

@@peterfireflylund yes, but what did he do with it? she recognized its importance. did he have the insight to decipher it?

@@kalevala29 she certainly didn’t. Support about the feminist myth you’ve been fed but it’s wrong.

@@peterfireflylund I'm not sure about his myth but are you denying that when Hahn and Strassmann conducted experiments that led to the discovery of nuclear fission, it was Meitner who made sense of their results. She realized that the nucleus had split. All that was overshadowed.

Yes, I thought the video was about Meitner.

A much better choice for an overlooked scientist than Franklin! The problem there, as in many other cases, is that there were more than 3 people who each contributed something unique and indispensable to the discovery. She was just one of them. She was not the only one who didn't get a Nobel Prize for that discovery. The others were men.

I think you can get it after you die. 😔

I’m sorry, I’m meant *can’t. You can’t get it after you die.

Indeed. Barack Hussein Obama II being a recent, outrageous example.

But don't let that get in the way of a good woke victimhood narrative lol.

That's just it. The Nobel prize can't be awarded posthumously. It can only be awarded to living persons.

@@dirremoireAnd only to up to three people.

Why should brilliant minded women be denied their brilliance and men lauded for theirs. This male orientated mindset is counter productive to the advancement of our society.

This is a Classic example of misogynistic horsemanure, and, of course was written by a man; absolutely revolting in my view. [Denver, Colorado]

@@arthurpowers3724 Are you assuming my gender? How dare you, you Neanderthal.

@@arthurpowers3724 Is he lying about anything? if he is, elaborate, rather than insult.

show us your discoveries

@@asdf-mg7tu The question should be directed at Franklin. What were her discoveries? None, she and her assustants took pictures without ever coming up with a structural model. Being placed on a pedestal by ignorant feminists.