this is how mongolia attacked Poland

👊🏻🇦🇱🖤AUTOCHTONOUS SHQIPTAR🖤🇦🇱👊🏻

@@user-gg4dh7yj9l : The proper word is ''autochthonous" and is Greek, your small county was in Caspian and had nothing to do with the today's which 1/3 is Greek (North Epirus). Keep in mind that Illyrian coins had Greek depictions on them.

*1264* Golden Horde: "The Mongols? Never heard of 'em."

But then the Poles managed to defeat the Mongols! But one can also state the following about Poland in connection with the video. Polish-Lithuanian Union is still acceptable, although Poles already completely dominated the state at that time and it was actually a Polish empire for a long time. But Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is absolutely wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. In any case, it would make sense to use the Polish proper name Rzeczpospolita as a designation for this state, which was actually still internationally common in the 19th century when talking about Poland before the partitions. The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term. By the way, the Polish Empire could also be used as an alternative to Rzeczpospolita for this state if one wants to use a modern term. The term Swedish Empire is also used, or even Danish Empire. Here is an addition to the Polish Empire because the term is rarely used. Poland was an empire at this time! This already proves the enormous size of the territory that the Polish king and the Polish parliament ruled. Why did Poland occupy Moscow in 1610? Why did the son of the Polish king become the Tsar of Russia? Out of imperial interest. Why did Poland rule the Ukrainian and Belarusian territories and all the other areas? Why did Poland control other areas as well? Out of economic interest, because the economic interests were also imperial interests. That goes hand in hand! By the way, an empire is usually a multi-ethnic state with political and military dominion of one ethnic group. Usually with one single imperial ruling ethnic group. And those were the Poles in this Polish Empire. The Poles ruled over various peoples and 5 different religious groups. The Poles ruled over the other peoples and in some cases also assimilated them. The Lithuanians were also controlled and assimilated by the Poles. Incidentally, it was a Polish empire, because the Poles were the nation in power. The Poles ruled the other peoples and partially assimilated them. That is why the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! That was a Polish empire, which is why mentioning Lithuania in the state name is wrong. What is also relatively good about the video is that the so-called Holy Roman Empire, which should actually be correctly translated as "Holy Romen Realm", is referred as small states. But nevertheless, a kind of unit is suggested here that did not exist in reality because the small states are represented in one color as a unit. That's wrong because the Holy Roman Realm actually fell apart with the death of Kaiser Otto I. In fact, the German small states were actually permanently at war with each other, so that a united state could not arise! 1000 years they killed each other. One of the highlights was the Thirty Years' War. The areas inhabited by Germans were a patchwork of territories! Consisting of hundreds of smaller sub-units of principalities, bailiwicks, margraviates, lordships, free cities, baronies, duchies and even simple counties and bishoprics and other domains. The kaiser title was only status without real political meaning! Because the Holy Roman Realm was not a state, but a complex of territories. The siege of Vienna in 1683 was also proof that the kaiser's title had no political significance. The kaiser title was only status without real political meaning! So the Holy Roman Realm was over the centuries without central authority! For example the so-called Kaiser Leopold could not order the other German states at the second siege of Vienna in 1683 to send troops to save his capital, for his capital was not recognized as the capital of the all other German small states. Leopold's will was meaningless to the other Rulers of the other German small states. Only a few German states sent troops to support the Habsburgs. Because there was not enough support from the other German states and and the Habsburgs were too weak alone, so Leopold had to ask Polish Empire for help! Also these Germans of this small states often killed each other with the support of non-German allies. A completely ridiculous and stupid nation that was in a civil war for 1000 years and only managed to found a united German state in 1871. It was only in 1871 that the first permanent unified German state emerged. That is why the Germans are also known as the late nation. Because the first unified German state was only founded in 1871! By the way, at most, one could call this patchwork of territories a military alliance. But even that is actually wrong, because within a military alliance the allies do not fight each other all the time! The various German states also founded alliances, which also makes it clear that the Holy Romen Realm did not in fact exist! For example the Rheinische Allianz or the Welfenallianz or the Hildesheimer Allianz or the Kurrheinian alliance. It is interesting that these alliances could also include non-German states. For example was Sweden member of the Rheinische Allianz and France too! This demonstrates the confusion and the absurdity of the the Holy Romen Realm

I (Poland)

Yiade romania

I am looking at the freaky soviet russia and stronk duchy of warsaw also Great Prussia.😁😁😁😁

SimpleMelody me 🇮🇪

Poland

Alejandro Moreno Napoleon

Yes, but not everything is correct! Polish-Lithuanian Union is still acceptable, although Poles already completely dominated the state at that time and it was actually a Polish empire for a long time. But Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is absolutely wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. In any case, it would make sense to use the Polish proper name Rzeczpospolita as a designation for this state, which was actually still internationally common in the 19th century when talking about Poland before the partitions. The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term. By the way, the Polish Empire could also be used as an alternative to Rzeczpospolita for this state if one wants to use a modern term. The term Swedish Empire is also used, or even Danish Empire. Here is an addition to the Polish Empire because the term is rarely used. Poland was an empire at this time! This already proves the enormous size of the territory that the Polish king and the Polish parliament ruled. Why did Poland occupy Moscow in 1610? Why did the son of the Polish king become the Tsar of Russia? Out of imperial interest. Why did Poland rule the Ukrainian and Belarusian territories and all the other areas? Why did Poland control other areas as well? Out of economic interest, because the economic interests were also imperial interests. That goes hand in hand! By the way, an empire is usually a multi-ethnic state with political and military dominion of one ethnic group. Usually with one single imperial ruling ethnic group. And those were the Poles in this Polish Empire. The Poles ruled over various peoples and 5 different religious groups. The Poles ruled over the other peoples and in some cases also assimilated them. The Lithuanians were also controlled and assimilated by the Poles. Incidentally, it was a Polish empire, because the Poles were the nation in power. The Poles ruled the other peoples and partially assimilated them. That is why the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! That was a Polish empire, which is why mentioning Lithuania in the state name is wrong. What is also relatively good about the video is that the so-called Holy Roman Empire, which should actually be correctly translated as "Holy Romen Realm", is referred as small states. But nevertheless, a kind of unit is suggested here that did not exist in reality because the small states are represented in one color as a unit. That's wrong because the Holy Roman Realm actually fell apart with the death of Kaiser Otto I. In fact, the German small states were actually permanently at war with each other, so that a united state could not arise! 1000 years they killed each other. One of the highlights was the Thirty Years' War. The areas inhabited by Germans were a patchwork of territories! Consisting of hundreds of smaller sub-units of principalities, bailiwicks, margraviates, lordships, free cities, baronies, duchies and even simple counties and bishoprics and other domains. The kaiser title was only status without real political meaning! Because the Holy Roman Realm was not a state, but a complex of territories. The siege of Vienna in 1683 was also proof that the kaiser's title had no political significance. The kaiser title was only status without real political meaning! So the Holy Roman Realm was over the centuries without central authority! For example the so-called Kaiser Leopold could not order the other German states at the second siege of Vienna in 1683 to send troops to save his capital, for his capital was not recognized as the capital of the all other German small states. Leopold's will was meaningless to the other Rulers of the other German small states. Only a few German states sent troops to support the Habsburgs. Because there was not enough support from the other German states and and the Habsburgs were too weak alone, so Leopold had to ask Polish Empire for help! Also these Germans of this small states often killed each other with the support of non-German allies. A completely ridiculous and stupid nation that was in a civil war for 1000 years and only managed to found a united German state in 1871. It was only in 1871 that the first permanent unified German state emerged. That is why the Germans are also known as the late nation. Because the first unified German state was only founded in 1871! By the way, at most, one could call this patchwork of territories a military alliance. But even that is actually wrong, because within a military alliance the allies do not fight each other all the time! The various German states also founded alliances, which also makes it clear that the Holy Romen Realm did not in fact exist! For example the Rheinische Allianz or the Welfenallianz or the Hildesheimer Allianz or the Kurrheinian alliance. It is interesting that these alliances could also include non-German states. For example was Sweden member of the Rheinische Allianz and France too! This demonstrates the confusion and the absurdity of the the Holy Romen Realm

@@GreatPolishWingedHussars also they were wrong about the Abbasid falling to the Safavids, it would the Samanids who would take over the Persian parts of the Caliphate but they still swore fealty to the Caliph in Baghdad, it also doesn’t show Ottoman conquest into Persia as they would have massive territory gains from the Safavids; that would later be lost to the Afsharids.

@@timurthejerk9270 So another error!

@@GreatPolishWingedHussars yeah, if this channel focused on empires or regions instead whole continents I think that would be more successful

@@_Kegasus You're exaggerating a little! But this topic also needs a detailed explanation! A book could even be written on the subject!

Templarkiller and over 80M person have die

Hirntot he said that because the years in this are changing so fast, that world war ll went by in like an instant!!

Still you have to give it to that undying German spirit which enabled Germany to conquer all of Europe by herself and three quarters of the world's nations against her. Too bad the globalist mafia were already in control of the world's finances.

Hirntot ich hab ihn auch gemeldet

Templarkiller hahahhahaa i laught so hard 😂

I prefer Hittites more.

what

Liechenstein my fav

@Gigachad same

Such nonsense! Why should one favorite this failed attempt to found a united German state? They were ridiculous and fought each other for 1000 years. By the way the so-called Holy Roman Empire but correctly named Holy Roman Realm actually fell apart with the death of Kaiser Otto I. In fact, the German small states were actually permanently at war with each other, so that a united state could not arise! 1000 years they killed each other. One of the highlights was the Thirty Years' War. But they also fought each other before and after Thirty Years' War. The areas inhabited by Germans were a patchwork of territories! Consisting of hundreds of smaller sub-units of principalities, bailiwicks, margraviates, lordships, free cities, baronies, duchies and even simple counties and bishoprics and other domains. The kaiser title was only status without real political meaning! Because the Holy Roman Realm was not a state, but a complex of territories. The siege of Vienna in 1683 was also proof that the kaiser's title had no political significance. The kaiser title was only status without real political meaning! So the Holy Roman Realm was over the centuries without central authority! For example the so-called Kaiser Leopold could not order the other German states at the second siege of Vienna in 1683 to send troops to save his capital, for his capital was not recognized as the capital of the all other German small states. Leopold's will was meaningless to the other Rulers of the other German small states. Only a few German states sent troops to support the Habsburgs. Because there was not enough support from the other German states and and the Habsburgs were too weak alone, so Leopold had to ask Polish Empire for help! Also these Germans of this small states often killed each other with the support of non-German allies. A completely ridiculous and stupid nation that was in a civil war for 1000 years and only managed to found a united German state in 1871. It was only in 1871 that the first permanent unified German state emerged. That is why the Germans are also known as the late nation. Because the first unified German state was only founded in 1871! By the way, at most, one could call this patchwork of territories a military alliance. But even that is actually wrong, because within a military alliance the allies do not fight each other all the time! The various German states also founded alliances, which also makes it clear that the Holy Romen Realm did not in fact exist! For example the Rheinische Allianz or the Welfenallianz or the Hildesheimer Allianz or the Kurrheinian alliance. It is interesting that these alliances could also include non-German states. For example was Sweden member of the Rheinische Allianz and France too! This demonstrates the confusion and the absurdity of the the Holy Romen Realm.

prussians are not prussia

Shizofrenia

@@user-xh7wg6yn5o not it was there people

@@user-xh7wg6yn5o I think

where's kosovo.

And South Ossetia and Abkazia

kosovo is serbia

Samachablo and Abkhazia is Georgia

Nope. South Ossetia and Abkhazia were country's before Georgia

Makes me pissed I’m gonna partition Austria

Austria was treating Poland in far better way than Prussia and Russia.

@@royalyeen2845 I'm gonna annex it.

poland didnt save vienna polish *******

😂

Ty jsi to zabil

Jono

Ес, бич

Great video! Right, I think so too. There are no distortions in shaping the territory of Poland. An example is East Pomerania. I greet you warmly: - *)

Though Germany wasn't exactly that large, especially through Italy.

Michael Cychosz *_flashback_*

xenotypos it occupied most of Italy after allies captured Mussolini

@@xenotypos Yes it was, Italy was Germany's bitch anyway

@@fabiana7157 (I'm Italian) Italy has a SHET army, he was beaten up by Greece, and nazi germany had to come to help italy

Petru Stefanescu Yes because the serben look for allied and they are the best slime !! they lost all of wars now try they try to win on KZfaq hahaha What wallachei is concerned it gives it everywhere on early maps

the only true video !

Vand cauciuc

Petru Stefanescu Sărumâna! :))

roman empire transport albanian in balkan ottoman empire transport sqiptaria bro this is real stori

Yep: Romans, Sassanids, Romans, Sassanids...

Tom Tom, armenia inside of the Ottoman empire. Asia and the half of the eu ruled for the 600 years without human zoo's.

No they were allied with rome, then persia then rome then persia :) Besides that, armenia was and is still today in middle of 2 continents. If you want to invade persia, you kinda had to pass armenia

"Thanks"Stalin , you made armenians stronger by contributing them a land to increase

Tom Tom Armenia is great country and civilization, make Armenia great again!!

David Fernandez Mine started 5:13 lol.

Scandium 5:11 You have interesting prospective!

David Fernandez 5:10

mine started on 4:58

David Fernandez καληνυκτα

as much as you suffer you stand strong. 🇬🇷❤🇦🇲

Love Armenia from USA

Love Armenia from Serbia Orthodox brothers and sisters 🇷🇸🇬🇷🇦🇲🇷🇺♥️

north cyprus is a country!!

OP also didn't include the Smyrni (Izmir) area in the Greek Territory, since it was Greek for a few years.

Coonkie the video is very inaccurate, there is a lack of a lot of tribes in the 500s , such as ilirians , dardanians , kosovo in 2008 independence , and there were no barbar forces that brought the roman empire down

Powa Crafters Kosovo is not a country.Its a part of Serbia. Its self declared

Blank space you are right about that small war and that SOVIET RUSSIA *vodka and meme music activate* didn't exist then, but i thought it was the russians who invaded. better check the history

Mati Mapping yes

Mati Mapping Yep

nice englando

Jacky Boy ?

your english sucks

Георги Димитров volga bulgarians were turkic ?

Пита та дали Волжките българи са били тюрки

Today Bulgarianians , hybit peoples. Missing children of the Russians

The volga bulgarians were not turkic, ffs.

bulgaria is oldest country then russia turkish idiot go to shool as so your country it is formed 13 centery Otoman and finish whit Ataturk 19 centery

S&F is Serbian

Because S&F is retarded. Damn Crimea isn't Russia. It has been OCCUPIED

tarkan standart, so what? Napoleon's conquests were shown

no one cares about you cherlyn

+Cherylyn Barnes: Can't spell Dislike without like ;)

xpto41 dude fuck our continent we always in war no wonder usa surpased us in just 500 years lol

how many likes for the possible origin of mankind www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/

xpto41 You mean , the most EVIL 😈

Nice idea! But probably not interested! The only thumbs up, by the way, is from me! :) Yours warmly: - *

Night Yoshi Its prank bro x)

Greetings from ottomans , polish !

StriKer Jake but poland was part of commonhealth

Mine too

(I am Slovak) Btw thanks for high Tatras :3 Poland (or Bołeslaw Chrobry) gives us bottom part of Poland. Thx m8

Armenia 3000 BC -2019

Fuck armenia

@@ArmyNation000 Küfür etme

@@H.D.313 neden

@@ArmyNation000 edebe aykırı

4:40 Greece :Hallo Tourkey

JOhn CEna ummm... no

ummm... yes

Wormaf * 50 yes ,50 no

ummmmm... no

Uhhh....it was really just called duchy of warsaw.😐😐😐

Yes like Germany is devided in small States like Netherlands Belgium Austria Switzerland Luxembourg Lichtenstein, and other parts are annexed by France Poland Denmark Italy Czech republic Latvia Estonia and Lithuania

And the free dacians the part of dacia that was not conquered

Hi

Hi

@@deepakgahar8971 why are you idiot?

I love poland too but in history england kills millions of innocent people so i dont like england

Wielga bolzga

Poland And lithunia and hungary :)

Nuke ツ Polak Węgier dwa bratanki i do szabli i do szklanki obaj zuchy obaj żwawi niech im Pan Bóg błogosławi

Poland Hungary forever

Russia and Germany, kekekeke)

yes lithuania nahui and poland kurwa

chris alexiou Yes and now you owe money to Germany

Dame Nikitič This is dissapointing...

And now Germany is building world's economy and you're just their ass kissers. Karma is a biotch

Soon both gayreece and gayrmany will be overtaken by muslims :)

And today Germany is the most powerfull economy of Europe and Greeks live on trees...

No way. Maybe only with the name.

keep doing propaganda you can think whatever you want but the reality you can't change we are autochthonous here when we fought with the Turk you became a Turk lover as much as you gave the king's daughter together with the greek which almost did not exist as a state but just a few principalities and you Serbs do not tell how old you are but go to your mother russia stupid people go on watch videos made by idiots like this here you are just a stupid child

Well no, Albania wasn’t in the Caucasus, those were Greeks and Turks. Serbia showed up in the year 1100 with its assimilated people. Albania has been in the balkans since Pelasgian times. And Kosova has always been ethnically Albanian. Of the 498 mosques in Kosovo that were in active use, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) documented that 225 mosques sustained damage or destruction by the Yugoslav Serb army. After the war, a list was compiled which documented that over 13,500 people were killed or went missing during the two year conflict. The Yugoslav and Serb forces caused the displacement of between 1.2 million to 1.45 million Kosovo Albanians. the Serbian government began a crackdown on the Kosovar Albanian population, raiding villages and expelling people from their homes. Massacres by the Serbian police were reported, and suspects taken into police custody were often beaten and tortured to extort confessions.

The only fact is that San Marino is the oldest country in Europe

@@pyrrhus9725 Everything has a history. Kosovo was mostly inhabited by Serbs. Until the Serbs were expelled during the Ottoman and German occupation with the support of the Albanians. Also, the numbers you claim are wrong. The numbers you claim are wrong. The Humanitarian Law Center released a list of people killed or gone missing during the war, including 8,661 Kosovo Albanian civilians, 1,797 ethnic Serbs and 447 civilians of other ethnicities such as Romani people and Bosniaks. Both sides were equally violent only that the Serbs had a superior army. So that's why they were more successful in the expulsions! You have already described the crimes of the Serbs! Quote from Wiki Link: "War crimes in the Kosovo War" The (Albanian) KLA was responsible for serious abuses... including abductions and murders of Serbs and ethnic Albanians considered collaborators with the state. Elements of the KLA are also responsible for post-conflict attacks on Serbs, Roma, and other non-Albanians, as well as ethnic Albanian political rivals... widespread and systematic burning and looting of homes belonging to Serbs, Roma, and other minorities and the destruction of Orthodox churches and monasteries... combined with harassment and intimidation designed to force people from their homes and communities... elements of the KLA are clearly responsible for many of these crimes.

The only difference between Hun Turks and Oghuz Turks is that Oghuz Turks migrated to Anatolia in large numbers and the migraiton lasted for 5 centuries. They made the majority of Anatolia. On the other hand Huns did not migrate in large numbers to Eastern Europe so they were assimilated by Slavs.

Modern day turks have less than 15% turkic DNA. Original turks look like asians Like the huns and mongols, modern day turks don't sееm to have any asian characteristics.

Modern day turks are mostly slavic and have features from the countries they uses to rule. You barely see asiatic feautures in turks

Of course hunGAYrians are not european native they go strong becuse convert to Catholicism and suck from pope like this they have suport them and polish to sluther russians becuse stay orthodox same shit do hunGAYrians with serbs and romanian

All of them are mongols from central Asia.

The video is just not perfect and there are also mistakes regarding Poland! Polish-Lithuanian Union is still acceptable, although Poles already completely dominated the state at that time and it was actually a Polish empire for a long time. But Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is absolutely wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. In any case, it would make sense to use the Polish proper name Rzeczpospolita as a designation for this state, which was actually still internationally common in the 19th century when talking about Poland before the partitions. The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term. By the way, the Polish Empire could also be used as an alternative to Rzeczpospolita for this state if one wants to use a modern term. The term Swedish Empire is also used, or even Danish Empire. Here is an addition to the Polish Empire because the term is rarely used. Poland was an empire at this time! This already proves the enormous size of the territory that the Polish king and the Polish parliament ruled. Why did Poland occupy Moscow in 1610? Why did the son of the Polish king become the Tsar of Russia? Out of imperial interest. Why did Poland rule the Ukrainian and Belarusian territories and all the other areas? Why did Poland control other areas as well? Out of economic interest, because the economic interests were also imperial interests. That goes hand in hand! By the way, an empire is usually a multi-ethnic state with political and military dominion of one ethnic group. Usually with one single imperial ruling ethnic group. And those were the Poles in this Polish Empire. The Poles ruled over various peoples and 5 different religious groups. The Poles ruled over the other peoples and in some cases also assimilated them. The Lithuanians were also controlled and assimilated by the Poles. Incidentally, it was a Polish empire, because the Poles were the nation in power. The Poles ruled the other peoples and partially assimilated them. That is why the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! That was a Polish empire, which is why mentioning Lithuania in the state name is wrong. What is also relatively good about the video is that the so-called Holy Roman Empire, which should actually be correctly translated as "Holy Romen Realm", is referred as small states. But nevertheless, a kind of unit is suggested here that did not exist in reality because the small states are represented in one color as a unit. That's wrong because the Holy Roman Realm actually fell apart with the death of Kaiser Otto I. In fact, the German small states were actually permanently at war with each other, so that a united state could not arise! 1000 years they killed each other. One of the highlights was the Thirty Years' War. The areas inhabited by Germans were a patchwork of territories! Consisting of hundreds of smaller sub-units of principalities, bailiwicks, margraviates, lordships, free cities, baronies, duchies and even simple counties and bishoprics and other domains. The kaiser title was only status without real political meaning! Because the Holy Roman Realm was not a state, but a complex of territories. The siege of Vienna in 1683 was also proof that the kaiser's title had no political significance. The kaiser title was only status without real political meaning! So the Holy Roman Realm was over the centuries without central authority! For example the so-called Kaiser Leopold could not order the other German states at the second siege of Vienna in 1683 to send troops to save his capital, for his capital was not recognized as the capital of the all other German small states. Leopold's will was meaningless to the other Rulers of the other German small states. Only a few German states sent troops to support the Habsburgs. Because there was not enough support from the other German states and and the Habsburgs were too weak alone, so Leopold had to ask Polish Empire for help! Also these Germans of this small states often killed each other with the support of non-German allies. A completely ridiculous and stupid nation that was in a civil war for 1000 years and only managed to found a united German state in 1871. It was only in 1871 that the first permanent unified German state emerged. That is why the Germans are also known as the late nation. Because the first unified German state was only founded in 1871! By the way, at most, one could call this patchwork of territories a military alliance. But even that is actually wrong, because within a military alliance the allies do not fight each other all the time! The various German states also founded alliances, which also makes it clear that the Holy Romen Realm did not in fact exist! For example the Rheinische Allianz or the Welfenallianz or the Hildesheimer Allianz or the Kurrheinian alliance. It is interesting that these alliances could also include non-German states. For example was Sweden member of the Rheinische Allianz and France too! This demonstrates the confusion and the absurdity of the the Holy Romen Realm.

But we do and are going to stand still! Bad times will always be but they do not rule every aspects of our lives!

Piotr Mosakowski how they used to be exactly? Poland has never been a powerful country in the past

Mattonella Scheggiata polish lithuania commonwealth??? It was one of strongest countries in europe

+StriKer Jake, because it was just Poland.

+StriKer Jake, this is reality. Deal with it.

Im proud that im not :)

bravo Suren. Armenians are amazing warriors

Przemo Pppp Respekt from Romania bro

*Random hungarian shows up Polak, Węgier, dwa bratanki, i do szabli, i do szklanki.

Poland-Hungary Forever.

No ok :-D

Poland &Hungry=frindes

Of course, you are right. Greetings from Poland :-)

Looks like bullshit, no similarity apart from V and W

because they lived there he froze and snow, who needs their land, no one reached them, the Romans did not reach, only the Russians

Фу стереотипы

Buster 6404 Its because they are poles

i only ever watch these to watch poland :P

Sociophobic Borderline ikr most other countries stay still for a really really long time with occasional wars but poland barely stops moving xd

Poland is the Best. We won 2 world wars! JEST MOOOOC!

Because Poland and Polish people are immortals betrayed from USA UK France and we still here heart of europe ;)

ВалькірыяXбледны you’re looking freaking sexy! Cheers 🥂 from Poland 🇵🇱 my dear 🇧🇬

Hey from Poland :)

Im polish! But learning croatian ;)

Thanks Bulgarian m8!

ВалькірыяXбледны Anybody noticed how France was powerfull for two time ?

Paw3l Nom :( Byliśmy potęgą :(

Ujmę to tak wtedy też byli tacy pisowcy jak teraz sa

JL

Milker może wszyscy troje ?

To jest często pomijane jak dominacja Rosji przez Polskę i unia ze Szwecją.