Because ppl became more smarter.

@@DBT1007 Firstly, it's smarter or more smart, not more smarter. Secondly, clarify please?

@@samuelspears6509 True, what he said is true depending on how far the destiny of every folk in Europe depended on Rome. However, years after years unt development started to rise among the folks in Europe that gave them the ability to upgrade their own civilizations on their own was a clear *clarified* sign that they are done with being a part of an Empire. That's the development he talked about.

Crete lasted 1100 years

Probaly because thare is none

lala lolol And some german tribes...

2) Not again...

1,020AD countries of Europe 1, 2, 3, 4... ah, hold on I'll be back in an hour.

Vlad Mărgăritescu Bosporan kingdom was technically part of Rome

@Vlad Mărgăritescu made by romans for romans and ruled by romans

History is much longer and much more storied than a lot of people realize. We have so many records of modern history (the last ~500 years) and so few from any time before that, that all those periods seem much shorter than they actually were, comparatively. It's a tragedy because the period from around the end of the bronze age to the beginning of the muslim conquests (~800BC-600AD) has not just a complete upheaval of the world several times over, but the foundations and developments of basically every school of thought and religion that we still have with us today. But that era is also 1400 years long, and we hardly know anything about it compared to the imperialist/modern era, which is 1/3 the length of time. Nevermind those 4 events, which all happened in the last 150 years.

An both wars were started by idiots in mainland Europe.

VC YT The two world wars were terrible.We should cherish peace. Although I am Scottish

@Cosmic Fool often historians overlook patterns of force.

@@VCYT Christian Europeans as always..

@@VCYT If the wars were outside of Europe, these wars will not be considered world wars. The except for the US (and Japan in WW2) all major powers of that time were in Europe.

Hungary contract cumans for invade Bohemia. Wenceslaus IV: NANI!

@@adnan_honest_jihadist5775Mongols invade china 1279: NANI???

*Mongols:* omae wu sindeiru *Cumans:* NANI

@@barsukascool China: NANI

@yang shang lol

What up gypsy.

Princip History - Videomapper Yep.

Why do I get a sense that the Carthagins and the Persian ain’t accurate

Kosovo free 2005!!!!

@@ghostleader61 No Kosovo Serbia forever

Reconnect.

Please do it's amazing over here

You'll be welcome.

Dear Steven, Europe is nice and I hope for you that you can visit one day this beautiful and diverse continent. I love to be European/German and enjoy this diversity. But don't forget the precious history and nature of your home. It's not only the time of the USA since 1776 or the Pilgrims of 1620, it's also the history of the Indians and also the history to be the torch of freedom. It was the USA that was the first modern democracy and your declaration of independence - although so many of the young generation don't honor it anymore - is a masterpiece of the enlightenment. This is, why I love your country so much although I feel bad because I don't agree with so many of your current foreign policy and lately I don't like this developments of the woke movement which in my view is a betray and huge danger of the enlightenment. Nevertheless, the USA was the first state in the world where individual but equal rights were introduced and this contribution to humans’ history is remarkable and can't be overestimated! The approach that everybody should be treated same (equal rights) is an astonishing revolution to organize a state. And, what the woke misunderstand, this does not mean to get equal outcome as so many of them believe. Your own individual pursuit of happiness determines the outcome and this by definition - as we humans are different - must lead to different outcome. Thus, equal outcome can only be achieved by unequal rights/opportunities and this is, why I believe this ideology is dangerous and would lead into tyranny and bring us back to the dark old time. Although I praise the American declaration of independence and democracy, it took time to translate this ideal in real equal rights and the current woke criticize this - fair enough. But it was the USA/the West that made it and overcame step by step exisiting burdens and no other nation achieved this before. Instead of celebrating that the US society was able to overcome the gap between ideal and reality they want to overcome the so called structural racism, patriarchy and white supremacist which in my view hardly exist anymore. This does not mean we are perfect now, but it seems we were on a good path and hopefully the woke can't create their new aristocratic system where so called deprived people should get privileged access to power - this would be a huge step back. I grew up in such an society where children of academics were punished with limited access to universities. But the only feature that enables should be competence. Of course, the USA is not perfect in creating equal opportunities and there is still huge room for improvement but we should work on to overcome this by creating equal chances instead of creating a discriminating system where people get privileged access just due to their sex, sexual orientation, race or what else. Thus, we have especially to keep an eye on the woke movement that they don't poisoning the society with such a totalitarian equal outcome virus. But I have trust that this will not happen - you/we have created a better system we ever saw in 10,000 years of civilization and it would be a pity if this doesn’t survive. Wasn't it an amazing ping pong of the mainly European philosophers that created the intellectual basis of an enlightened democracy and the American "Makers", that translated it into the first modern society and re-influenced Europe to follow the Americas successful experiment? Thus, USA and Europe can be proud of that what our common fathers and mothers have achieved, and we should conserve this and - where necessary - improve this. P.S.: Sorry - I might exaggerate with the statement above but I see on the one hand too often arrogant Americans (we are the best) but also on the other hand so many like you, that look wistfully to Europe and believe they don't have an interesting history. This is in my view not true - The US-history is so incredible and I think USA and Europe have similar roots that connects Europe’s history strongly with the US-history - but you have also in addition the rich history of natives and indeed the incredible success history to be the first modern democracy. Instead of questioning this and even try to overcome the good what the USA achieved as the woke wants, be proud to your history without the feeling of superiority/inferiority. Best Michael

@@schoeppemichael lol

Arminius. Fuck Rome.

That's nonsense, because there was no such thing as Germany back then. For the rest, it is at least positive that the so-called Holy Roman Empire is correctly shown as a patchwork of territories and not as a united state as is often done.

@@GreatPolishWingedHussars yea, it was called East Francia

@@Randomdude112 Yeah right!

@@GreatPolishWingedHussars btw I mean before The Holy Roman Empire was east Francia

Love and German raids doesn't match at all! By the way, absolutely negative is that Poland and Lithuania are not shown as a unified state since the Union of Krewo in 1385. Also unfortunately, as almost always, the wrong name for the Polish Empire with Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is used here.Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is totally wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. Or the Polish name of the state of Rzeczpospolita or written in English Shechpospolita. But it is positive that the so-called Holy Roman Empire is correctly shown as a patchwork of territories and not as a united state as is often done.

@@GreatPolishWingedHussars This video clearly didn't teach you to put things in perspective when it's about borders, nationality and history. To me it did.

Brilliant guy 🙏

Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus very important year that was. The rest of the video literally makes no sense without the context of that year

So you are insulting and joking at him for giving him small feedback for something he did wrong.Very cool

Hey Tiberius are you the younger or elder?

@@antoninuslarpus7107 the older, the younger was Gaius sampronius Graccus :)

@Swerk HD Production - SHP so funny. Huns are Turks. Balamir, Attila were Turkish Khanans. Pechenegs, Kipchaks, Kyrgyzs, Avara Turkic tribes.

You mean Alexander the Great:hold my beer I reached India.

The huns made an appearance just to fuck up the Roman Empire, and then, they disappeared again. Hahaha

@@user-kh9dc5il2o if alexander didn't die so young today everyone would have been under greek rule and we would have martian colonies

@@TheHunterOfYharnam το ξερω

Yep

Not a great job because absolutely negative is that Poland and Lithuania are not shown as a unified state since the Union of Krewo in 1385. Also unfortunately, as almost always, the wrong name for the Polish Empire with Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is used here.Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is totally wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. Or the Polish name of the state of Rzeczpospolita or written in English Shechpospolita. But it is positive that the so-called Holy Roman Empire is correctly shown as a patchwork of territories and not as a united state as is often done.

@@GreatPolishWingedHussars they weren’t one state in that year they were in a personal union

​@@pinghpin3 A personal union dominated and ruled by the Poles!

@@GreatPolishWingedHussars he’s a pro Russian just look at the end of the video

Тако је Брат!

And today you must suck under the Germans. Your are not slavs- your hunns

@Demy Troy no, Bulgarian are Slav

@Demy Troy they are Tatars, Turko-Uralic tribe, they have no right to call themselfs Slavic.

@@user-qq1nv5dv3w they are the only "Slavic" coutry to use Fascism and only Balkan country to use Fascism. They are traitors and Turko-Uralic tribe. They have no right to call themselfs Slavic.

No.

Laugh in Napoleon

The Ottomans didn't conquer all this part of northern Algeria an other mistake, because there was many berber kingdoms in the south of the Algerian coast

@@onurcnky just stfu stop being such a dick

that would be 9:15

Ama ben oraya bayılıyorum

@@gerald1495 and not the crusaders sacking Constantinople?

@@pakitech1496 fun fact: the Crusades were a response to three hundred years of Muslim invasion (the Crusades were COUNTER-attack).

In any case, there was Great Moravia in the 9th century, which was an empire by the standards of the time and is also called that by Wiki. By the way, absolutely negative is that Poland and Lithuania are not shown as a unified state since the Union of Krewo in 1385. Also unfortunately, as almost always, the wrong name for the Polish Empire with Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is used here.Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is totally wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. Or the Polish name of the state of Rzeczpospolita or written in English Shechpospolita. But it is positive that the so-called Holy Roman Empire is correctly shown as a patchwork of territories and not as a united state as is often done.

ok but nobody cares about that lil shithole of urs honestly

EU4 player here :)

@@GreatPolishWingedHussars all empires that ever have been are a cooperation of smaller duchies or territories. The Holy Roman Empire was no different. England, was a commonwealth or "co-op" between many local lords all vying for regional power, the same was with the Ayubids, the Persians, the Chinese emperor kingdoms. To claim that an empire is ever anything more than the willingness of its citizens to continue under the current leadership and laws is and always was inherently incorrect. There are only 2 reasons wars are fought on a local level, the first, which is the most common in history, is over oppressive laws and leadership oftentimes levying taxes on goods or even confiscation causing mass starvation in the name of a foreign attempt at conquest. The second is over rights to land, status, and title, still very common but less common that foreign intervention as most titular conflicts were snuffed out before conflicts arose by the ruling power at the time in each respective government. As for your translation about the Polish - Lithuanian Commonwealth, I'm unsure how you can claim it is translated incorrectly. You yourself translated it into the very words or prefixes within the title you claimed was incorrect so perhaps site where the true name came from to source its genesis instead of arguing over the translation.

@@christianjohns8352 Such nonsense, as if in real empires the regions were constantly at war and there was in this empires no central power as was the case in the Holy Roman Realm. By definition, an empire is usually a very large in terms of area multi-ethnic state with a strong central power and with political and military dominion of one ethnic group. The Holy Roman Realm wasn't all that, because it wasn't even a state and certainly not an empire. That was just a patchwork of territories consisting of hundreds of smaller sub-units of principalities, bailiwicks, margraviates, lordships, free cities, baronies, duchies and even simple counties and bishoprics and other territories. A complex of territories without a generally recognized central authority! That were all German small states. This all German small states were actually permanently at war with each other, so that a unified could not arise! 1000 years they killed each other. Ridiculous to call something like that an empire!

:P

havker he teleported

Hungary: Hold my goulasch

think of all the Latin being pump in Europe leading to the romance languages, the most beautiful in the world

It actually lasts until 9:15

Never to be united again But then again it was that devision and conflict of Europe wich allowed it to progres faster then other continents

@@vlacko they are all united and larger and more organized than ever before. EU

@@cronjustin11 EU isn't a single country

@@cronjustin11 and it's preety disfuncional if you ask me

what if the world is just a more advanced worldbox and we live inside it

Not really nice because absolutely negative is that Poland and Lithuania are not shown as a unified state since the Union of Krewo in 1385. Also unfortunately, as almost always, the wrong name for the Polish Empire with Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is used here.Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is totally wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. Or the Polish name of the state of Rzeczpospolita or written in English Shechpospolita. But it is positive that the so-called Holy Roman Empire is correctly shown as a patchwork of territories and not as a united state as is often done.

@@GreatPolishWingedHussars tl;dr

That is not the best historical timelaps video because absolutely negative is that Poland and Lithuania are not shown as a unified state since the Union of Krewo in 1385. Also unfortunately, as almost always, the wrong name for the Polish Empire with Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is used here.Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is totally wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. Or the Polish name of the state of Rzeczpospolita or written in English Shechpospolita. But it is positive that the so-called Holy Roman Empire is correctly shown as a patchwork of territories and not as a united state as is often done.

@@GreatPolishWingedHussars Interesujace nigdy niewidzialem zeby ktos uzywal term 'Polish Empire' zamiast 'Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth'. Tylko znam jedna ksiazke z tytulem 'Polskie Imperium' ale jej jeszcze nieprzaeczytalem

@@jarogniewtheconqueror2804 Już czytałem o 'Polish Empir! Ale masz rację, to jest rzadko! Ale Polacy powinni z dumą mówić o 'Polish Empir i nie posługiwać się absurdalnym Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Niestety KZfaq nie akceptuje linku, w którym można przeczytać o Polish Empir. Ale jeśli wygooglujesz: "The Empire of Poland and the Baltic Nations" możesz znaleźć link! Cytat: Tytuł: "The Empire of Poland and the Baltic Nations! The Empire of Poland, at times, has reached from the Baltic Sea to the Black Sea; its territory being important for its position along trade routes in the Baltic Region. Poland’s closest Baltic neighbor (Lithuania), has been a valued ally in the battle for freedom from foreign rule of Sweden, Germany, Russia, Prussia and Austria since 1386. Although the Polish Empire was continually invaded, beginning in 1605, technology and education in Poland remained strong and progressive for the time and "polonization" of the Lithuanian nobility was evident."

@@jarogniewtheconqueror2804 KZfaq nie powiadamia o wszystkich odpowiedziach! No odpowiedziałem ci!

@@GreatPolishWingedHussars KZfaq jest okropny jesli chodzi o wyswietlenia komentarzy. Juz pojde czytac o tym, jak masz jakies inne rekomendacje to chentnie sie popatrze

@metal flames there has never been a vlaho Bulgar

@metal flames Maybe in Romania, but not in the other parts of the World.

bulgarian khanate is turkic

Germany?

okay this is weird every where i go i see u in the comments lol but i love ur content keep it up 👍

they went from small states controlled by decentralised emperors to proper nation-states led by ideologies which required centralised states

nationalism

Something something industrial revolution?

Well, there was nothing around

Impressive, we found tthe OG

The reason to mark a territory as a separated state is the fact of ermed forces and independent laws acting on this territory. It absolutely does not matter how many other states have approved the proclaimed independance. It should be relied on who controls the land and only on it. So LDNR and Kosovo should both be marked. I understand motives of the author not to exclude Kosovo from Serbia but he should be a proffessional.

The creator of this video is Serbian.

Red Komunyaka I know. I didn't say that Donetsk and Luhansk shouldn't be included. I was only trying to prove what I was saying. If you don't wanna include a specific state, then why not include any of them to prevent bias?

Thats it because donetsk and luhansk are rightfully russia and kosovo is rightfuly serbia. Simple.

Joker, I do not dispute. It's for serbian author to mean this nonconformity.

Not so many kingdoms, but there were tribes and they were marked

@@mrcar2237 the Scythians were there high cultured nation

Brāļi!

Lithuania :(

Doskonale

and kosovo

@@xxleomappinggamingxxfirey4429 Kosovo isn’t an error

history addict Hold up, he actually shows Transnistria, Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk, but not Kosovo. Wow.

good luck making a better one...

That's the reason why it and it's Sucessor the Eastern Roman Empire are so revierd Shure empires with larger territory exist and with spedier counquest BUT none NONE evere lasted as long as Romans.

PAX ROMANA

I know who youre youre the making mostly balkan countries youre greek I have to say I saw Greece Athens and Selanik Im from Turkey Too smilar also my familie use to live in Selanik "theselaniko" and bulgaria they were Balkan Turks after the Ballan Wars they are living in Istanbul

Which is not a small error and absolutely negative that Poland and Lithuania are not shown as a unified state since the Union of Krewo in 1385. Also unfortunately, as almost always, the wrong name for the Polish Empire with Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is used here.Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is totally wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. Or the Polish name of the state of Rzeczpospolita or written in English Shechpospolita. But it is positive that the so-called Holy Roman Empire is correctly shown as a patchwork of territories and not as a united state as is often done.

@@GreatPolishWingedHussars oh my god you writed a poem

@@Fun4Fan0309 You're exaggerating!

@@GreatPolishWingedHussars nah! XD

@@Fun4Fan0309 Yes! No XD!

Which was also a mistake and absolutely negative that Poland and Lithuania are not shown as a unified state since the Union of Krewo in 1385. Also unfortunately, as almost always, the wrong name for the Polish Empire with Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is used here.Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is totally wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. Or the Polish name of the state of Rzeczpospolita or written in English Shechpospolita. But it is positive that the so-called Holy Roman Empire is correctly shown as a patchwork of territories and not as a united state as is often done.

love azerbaijan from hungary hunnic brothers🇭🇺❤🇦🇿

Great Horder never exists

Eu4 players be like: 1444 *STOP THE VIDEO*

Timur destroying

Juanma Breda *S O R R Y S I R I D O N T S P E A K D E S P A C I T O*

Hay muchos fallos en este vídeo. A mí me molesta por ejemplo que pongan que España no existía como Estado hasta bien las reformas borbónicas ya en los 1700s. Si fuese así, entonces podríamos separar al Reino Unido en Inglaterra, Escocia, Gales e Irlanda del Norte, ya que son las cuatro naciones que representan ese país y juegan olímpicamente separados. ¿Eso no ponen, verdad? Pero a España si la ponen separada basándose en la Leyenda Negra. Que conste que no soy español, pero si pones a España dividida hasta 1700s, entonces Reino Unido tendría que estar dividida desde 1707, con la Reina Ana.

@@mcveigh1579 Use google translate.

@@mcveigh1579 *Aprende español.*

Take back your frickin native land

go back to asia you mongobulgar

bulgarian detected, Basil II deployed

Can't imagine what gave me away. Basil was his western name around here in the lands he was known to rule over he was known as Vasilii. Anyway it's a misconception that Bulgarians lived poorly during his reign quite the contrary in fact. It was his successors who messed up. If they all treated us the same as Vasilii II the movement that lead to the creation of the second Bulgarian empire would not have happened. But by some miracle if you happen to find a single Roman let him come. A Bulgarian is not a Bulgarian if he can't handle 2 to 3 Romans at the same time.

Also a absolutely negative mistake is that Poland and Lithuania are not shown as a unified state since the Union of Krewo in 1385. Also unfortunately, as almost always, the wrong name for the Polish Empire with Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is used here.Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is totally wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. Or the Polish name of the state of Rzeczpospolita or written in English Shechpospolita. But it is positive that the so-called Holy Roman Empire is correctly shown as a patchwork of territories and not as a united state as is often done.

Yes the video does not have perfect borders at all, but at least it represents all if not most states

@@sticlavoda5632 what is the countries in ukraine at the end of the video

Shut up

*Izmir marsi earape plays*

Demokratic President Gültepe FUCK TURKEY!!! Greece has 3000 years history (unlike turkish, that has only 1000 years), and Anatolia is greek land!

Demokratic President Gültepe You occupied greek lands and assimilate greek population in Anatolia which now is about 50% of Turkish population!!!!

The Greeks actually did assimilations too to the natives.

Canan Karatay'cı Mapper[CKM] Keep dreaming, fucking barbarian. You can’t destroy 3000 year civilization...

Dacia #2 stronger country

East rome + west rome + europe union< Huns Attila 😉🥋

@@kodadiSiyah94 Huns

@@Bracus.Reghusk moghol and turk is brother

Nö

Poland AND Lithuania, Poles wouldn't have reached that land without Lithuania

@@Red-jd2uj true but it was mostly Poland. Especially later on, Lithuania was second to Poland.

10:13 Poor Poland

🫡

​@@mangomaster5820 i think it was mostly lihtuania cuz before they had some parts of now Ukraine poland was smaller but I might be wrong