Big history for Brothers in Poland much love from The kingdom of Morocco 🇲🇦 🇲🇦
@dominikbartczak89612 жыл бұрын
Jesteś z Maroka?
@sdsdsdsd33692 жыл бұрын
@@dominikbartczak8961 tak właśnie napisał
@nataliadzwonek75542 жыл бұрын
@@dominikbartczak8961 Musisz po angielsku zadać to pytanie
@aansufatidico7772 жыл бұрын
🇪🇭🇪🇭🇪🇭
@unwaving3322 жыл бұрын
@mr freeze 🇲🇦❤🇵🇱
@angar35302 жыл бұрын
Szanuję mapkę Polski za czasów legendarnych (od Piasta po Mieszka I) i za zadbanie o najmniejsze szczegóły takie jak Kurlandzkie kolonie i strefę okupacyjną Niemiec, a potem Iraku, kawał dobrej roboty.
@lottythekidd-22 жыл бұрын
warto dodać, że Piast zmarł w 860 ;)
@jakubborysiak52092 жыл бұрын
Autor uwzględnił nawet państwo Jaxa założone na pograniczu rosyjsko-chińskim przez wygnańca z Wołynia :o
@GreatPolishWingedHussars Жыл бұрын
By the way, the video is actually pretty good! Lithuania is shown as part of the Polish Empire since the 1385 treaty of Krewo, as are other territories. Because of the personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385, Poland became an empire and Lithuania, like other territories, was part of the Polish Empire. The treaty of Krewo for personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385 was the first step in Poland's takeover of Lithuania. This union was declared indissoluble. This personal union meant that the Polish king should also be the ruler of Lithuania. In fact, the union treaty also contained the provision of the attaching of Lithuanian and Ruthenian lands to the Polish Crown. However, the various other treaties which followed this treaty actually meant the takeover and Polonization of Lithuania too. A significant resolution was the adoption of Polish administrative divisions and offices like voivode and castellan by Lithuania. Even more important was that in total 47 selected Lithuanian nobles were adopted by Polish nobles heraldic families and granted Polish coats of arm. This symbolic gesture signified their desire to adopt Polish customs and integrate into Polish society. Because of this possibility of heraldic adoption, Poland had a much higher proportion of nobles than other European kingdoms. In Poland, the proportion of nobles in the total population was already 10-15% in the 16th century, in the rest of Europe it was 1%. Thus the Union of Krewo in 1385 signified the beginnings of the strengthened Polonization of Lithuania. Strengthened Polonization because the Polonization actually started before the Union of Krewo, because Lithuania was Christianized from Poland. Priests, especially from Poland, Christianized Lithuania and priests had great influence at that time, so there was already a Polish Influence in Lithuania before the Union of Krewo. So the Polonization of Lithuania started with the Christianization and was finally completed with the Union of Lublin. What was also good was that it was shown that the Polish king also ruled Sweden with Finland for a short time. Unfortunately, because of his inability, he lost control of Sweden and Finland again BUT...what is bad is that the video does not show that the Polish Empire ruled Russia in 1610. Unfortunately, the same king Sigismund III Vasa lost rule over Russia because of the same incompetence as he previously lost rule over Sweden and Finland. What is also negative is that the historically wrong term "Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth" is used, although at least Lithuania is shown as part of the Polish Empire, although the wrong term is used to name the state. Unfortunately, many people and historians use the wrong term commonwealth in connection with Polish history. You too! But the term Commonwealth is inappropriate because it gives the impression that the state was a common wealth for Poles and Lithuanians alike. So the common wealth served both nations equally. But in reality the Lithuanians had to submit to the Poles and were largely Polonized and thus assimilated. It was actually a Polish empire completely dominated by the Poles. Lithuania was completely dominated by the Polish Empire like also the Ruthenians who were the ancestors of the Belarusians and Ukrainians. Poles completely dominated them all. The Lithuanians were voluntarily polonized and the Ruthenians partly too. All relevant was Polish like also the Polish currency Polski Złoty. Złoty means golden in Polish. The capitals of the entire state were the Polish cities of Krakow and Warsaw. The ruling Poles have also determined what the state should be called Polisch Rzeczpospolita! The Polish name was then adopted by the Lithuanians into the Lithuanian languages as "Žečpospolita". By the way, Polish term for nobility ”szlachta” was also adopted into Lithuanian as ”šlėkta” like many other Polish words. The majority of the loanwords in Lithuanian were from Polish. Polish dominance about the Lithuanians, so also about the Ruthenians illustrates also that the Polish king automatically became the grand duke of Lithuania. That was by far not the only additional title of the Polish kings. For example, the Polish King Sigismund III Vasa had in addition to the Polish royal title, Grand Duke of Lithuania and Grand Duke of Finland, Prince of Rus, Prussia, Mazovia, Volhynia, Podolia, Podlaskie, Severia, Czernihów, Samogitia, Livonia, also Hereditary King of Sweden. Rus stands for Russia because the Poles ruled large areas of Russia at the time, and even Moscow was briefly occupied by Polish troops. Samogitia stands for the Baltic States, which the Polish king largely ruled. Hereditary king of Sweden and Grand Duke of Finland because the Polish king was also the king of Sweden for a short time. But he lost the power in Sweden and Finland. This list of titles makes it clear that Grand Duke of Lithuania was just one of the many titles of the Polish king. But the most important title was always King of Poland. In the end, the title Grand Duke of Lithuania was just one of many Polish king's titles. The title was particularly important only at the beginning of the Polish rule over Lithuania, when the Lithuanian nobility was not yet Polonized. At that time the Poles still had to pretend the Lithuanian nobility that this was not a takeover. The treaty of Krewo for personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385 was the first step in Poland's takeover of Lithuania. This union was declared indissoluble. This personal union meant that the Polish king should also be the ruler of Lithuania. In fact, the union treaty also contained the provision of the attaching of Lithuanian and Ruthenian lands to the Polish Crown. However, the various other treaties which followed this treaty actually meant the takeover and Polonization of Lithuania too. A significant resolution was that in total 47 selected Lithuanian nobles were adopted by Polish nobles heraldic families and granted Polish coats of arm. This symbolic gesture signified their desire to adopt Polish customs and integrate into Polish society. This was part of Poland's significantly increased Polonization of Lithuania. Thus the Union of Krewo in 1385 signified the beginnings of the strengthened Polonization of Lithuania. Strengthened Polonization because the Polonization actually started before the Union of Krewo, because Lithuania was Christianized from Poland. Priests, especially from Poland, Christianized Lithuania and priests had great influence at that time, so there was already a Polish Influence in Lithuania before the Union of Krewo. So the Polonization of Lithuania started with the Christianization and was finally completed with the Union of Lublin. Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is absolutely wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire which was completely dominated by the Poles and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. In any case, it would make sense to use the Polish proper name Rzeczpospolita as a designation for this state, which was actually still internationally common in the 19th century when talking about Poland before the partitions. The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term.
@TahockiMapper7 ай бұрын
bardziej przerysowanie od pogkpp
@AlekSander-yx8fv7 ай бұрын
Popiela brakuje:)
@Left_Behind2 жыл бұрын
Nieźle ci wyszło. Według mnie ten film byłby perfekcyjny gdybyś też dodał nazwy piosenek.
@bartomiejwalich61082 жыл бұрын
co by to wnioslo do filmu
@Left_Behind2 жыл бұрын
@@bartomiejwalich6108 do filmu nic, ale przydałoby się gdyby komuś podobałaby się piosenka a nie znałby tytułu
@uhanauh2 жыл бұрын
@@Left_Behind ukrainian people music. V samom nachale video
@lottythekidd-22 жыл бұрын
dla mnie to jest trochę słabe
@Left_Behind2 жыл бұрын
@@lottythekidd-2 czemu ?
@aleksandram96832 жыл бұрын
Wielki podziw i szacunek za ogrom włożonej pracy! 8:05 serce boli 😪
@pomiklom24992 жыл бұрын
6:32 A moe serdtse bolit tut, a raduetsya zdec 8:05
@AquaranSocialistRepublic Жыл бұрын
R.I.P Poland-Lithuania 1569-1795
@CYbeRuKRaINiaN2 жыл бұрын
Underrated work
@piotrkasprzyk39297 ай бұрын
Zawsze i wszędzie Polska najważniejsza mi będzie 🇵🇱💪✌
@MyFacchi2 жыл бұрын
Glory to Poland, a great nation!! 🇮🇹🤍🇵🇱
@lavion33302 жыл бұрын
Thx Italian Brother 🇵🇱🤍🇮🇹
@mrcheeseyt87142 жыл бұрын
Z ziemi Włoskiej🇮🇹 do Polskiej🇵🇱
@GreatPolishWingedHussars Жыл бұрын
By the way, the video is actually pretty good! Lithuania is shown as part of the Polish Empire since the 1385 treaty of Krewo, as are other territories. Because of the personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385, Poland became an empire and Lithuania, like other territories, was part of the Polish Empire. The treaty of Krewo for personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385 was the first step in Poland's takeover of Lithuania. This union was declared indissoluble. This personal union meant that the Polish king should also be the ruler of Lithuania. In fact, the union treaty also contained the provision of the attaching of Lithuanian and Ruthenian lands to the Polish Crown. However, the various other treaties which followed this treaty actually meant the takeover and Polonization of Lithuania too. A significant resolution was the adoption of Polish administrative divisions and offices like voivode and castellan by Lithuania. Even more important was that in total 47 selected Lithuanian nobles were adopted by Polish nobles heraldic families and granted Polish coats of arm. This symbolic gesture signified their desire to adopt Polish customs and integrate into Polish society. Because of this possibility of heraldic adoption, Poland had a much higher proportion of nobles than other European kingdoms. In Poland, the proportion of nobles in the total population was already 10-15% in the 16th century, in the rest of Europe it was 1%. Thus the Union of Krewo in 1385 signified the beginnings of the strengthened Polonization of Lithuania. Strengthened Polonization because the Polonization actually started before the Union of Krewo, because Lithuania was Christianized from Poland. Priests, especially from Poland, Christianized Lithuania and priests had great influence at that time, so there was already a Polish Influence in Lithuania before the Union of Krewo. So the Polonization of Lithuania started with the Christianization and was finally completed with the Union of Lublin. What was also good was that it was shown that the Polish king also ruled Sweden with Finland for a short time. Unfortunately, because of his inability, he lost control of Sweden and Finland again BUT...what is bad is that the video does not show that the Polish Empire ruled Russia in 1610. Unfortunately, the same king Sigismund III Vasa lost rule over Russia because of the same incompetence as he previously lost rule over Sweden and Finland. What is also negative is that the historically wrong term "Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth" is used, although at least Lithuania is shown as part of the Polish Empire, although the wrong term is used to name the state. Unfortunately, many people and historians use the wrong term commonwealth in connection with Polish history. You too! But the term Commonwealth is inappropriate because it gives the impression that the state was a common wealth for Poles and Lithuanians alike. So the common wealth served both nations equally. But in reality the Lithuanians had to submit to the Poles and were largely Polonized and thus assimilated. It was actually a Polish empire completely dominated by the Poles. Lithuania was completely dominated by the Polish Empire like also the Ruthenians who were the ancestors of the Belarusians and Ukrainians. Poles completely dominated them all. The Lithuanians were voluntarily polonized and the Ruthenians partly too. All relevant was Polish like also the Polish currency Polski Złoty. Złoty means golden in Polish. The capitals of the entire state were the Polish cities of Krakow and Warsaw. The ruling Poles have also determined what the state should be called Polisch Rzeczpospolita! The Polish name was then adopted by the Lithuanians into the Lithuanian languages as "Žečpospolita". By the way, Polish term for nobility ”szlachta” was also adopted into Lithuanian as ”šlėkta” like many other Polish words. The majority of the loanwords in Lithuanian were from Polish. Polish dominance about the Lithuanians, so also about the Ruthenians illustrates also that the Polish king automatically became the grand duke of Lithuania. That was by far not the only additional title of the Polish kings. For example, the Polish King Sigismund III Vasa had in addition to the Polish royal title, Grand Duke of Lithuania and Grand Duke of Finland, Prince of Rus, Prussia, Mazovia, Volhynia, Podolia, Podlaskie, Severia, Czernihów, Samogitia, Livonia, also Hereditary King of Sweden. Rus stands for Russia because the Poles ruled large areas of Russia at the time, and even Moscow was briefly occupied by Polish troops. Samogitia stands for the Baltic States, which the Polish king largely ruled. Hereditary king of Sweden and Grand Duke of Finland because the Polish king was also the king of Sweden for a short time. But he lost the power in Sweden and Finland. This list of titles makes it clear that Grand Duke of Lithuania was just one of the many titles of the Polish king. But the most important title was always King of Poland. In the end, the title Grand Duke of Lithuania was just one of many Polish king's titles. The title was particularly important only at the beginning of the Polish rule over Lithuania, when the Lithuanian nobility was not yet Polonized. At that time the Poles still had to pretend the Lithuanian nobility that this was not a takeover. The treaty of Krewo for personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385 was the first step in Poland's takeover of Lithuania. This union was declared indissoluble. This personal union meant that the Polish king should also be the ruler of Lithuania. In fact, the union treaty also contained the provision of the attaching of Lithuanian and Ruthenian lands to the Polish Crown. However, the various other treaties which followed this treaty actually meant the takeover and Polonization of Lithuania too. A significant resolution was that in total 47 selected Lithuanian nobles were adopted by Polish nobles heraldic families and granted Polish coats of arm. This symbolic gesture signified their desire to adopt Polish customs and integrate into Polish society. This was part of Poland's significantly increased Polonization of Lithuania. Thus the Union of Krewo in 1385 signified the beginnings of the strengthened Polonization of Lithuania. Strengthened Polonization because the Polonization actually started before the Union of Krewo, because Lithuania was Christianized from Poland. Priests, especially from Poland, Christianized Lithuania and priests had great influence at that time, so there was already a Polish Influence in Lithuania before the Union of Krewo. So the Polonization of Lithuania started with the Christianization and was finally completed with the Union of Lublin. Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is absolutely wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire which was completely dominated by the Poles and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. In any case, it would make sense to use the Polish proper name Rzeczpospolita as a designation for this state, which was actually still internationally common in the 19th century when talking about Poland before the partitions. The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term.
@AndrzejPuchelski Жыл бұрын
L'Italia che amo
@jukacyborg83392 жыл бұрын
Pozdrav iz Hrvatske braco Poljaci 🇵🇱🇭🇷
@bilbobaggins230210 ай бұрын
Chorwacja najlepszy kraj na Bałkanach ;) pozdroo
@czaszaprzeszly3717 ай бұрын
@@bilbobaggins2302 bo Hrvaty to Biali Chorwaci, którzy mieszkali pod Krakowem wyparci przez Wołochów czyli dzisiejszych górali około 1000 lat temu :)
@bilbobaggins23027 ай бұрын
@@czaszaprzeszly371 Polecasz jakiś odcinek albo artykuł o tym? Chętnie przeczytam.
@mefjumcz29222 жыл бұрын
No chłopie, szacun! :) To chyba najlepszy mapping historii Polski jaki widziałem! :D Bo w każdym innym zawsze czegoś brakuje albo są błędy. :/ Duże plusy za uwzględnienie +czasów prepiastowskich +szlaków i miejsc ważnych bitew i powstań +zdjęcia premierów i I sekretarzy +podziały jednostek administracyjnych +okres drugiej wojny światowej, który totalnie został pominięty przez Danzig Mappera, pomimo iż ten też wykonał kawał dobrej roboty Jedyny minus to że nie pokazywałeś które miasta były w poszczególnych latach stolicami ale to i tak kawał dobrej roboty! :)
@Claudel19907 ай бұрын
Jest 1 gruby błąd, pokazanie Polski jako niepodległej po drugiej wojnie, a w latach 1945-1989 była zależność wasalna od ZSRR, Polska państwem satelickim.
@maraluciaduclosduclos7496 Жыл бұрын
Ya hutves Polska. Eu amo a Polônia. Ich liebe Polen. Ya lyubyu Polskii. I love Poland. From Braziliya
@jankubiak32183 жыл бұрын
Niesamowita Praca.
@mrsponkman2 жыл бұрын
Big respect to Poland for staying determined
@feisty_2 жыл бұрын
Where are you from
@mrsponkman2 жыл бұрын
@@feisty_ New zealand, why?
@GreatPolishWingedHussars Жыл бұрын
By the way, the video is actually pretty good! Lithuania is shown as part of the Polish Empire since the 1385 treaty of Krewo, as are other territories. Because of the personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385, Poland became an empire and Lithuania, like other territories, was part of the Polish Empire. The treaty of Krewo for personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385 was the first step in Poland's takeover of Lithuania. This union was declared indissoluble. This personal union meant that the Polish king should also be the ruler of Lithuania. In fact, the union treaty also contained the provision of the attaching of Lithuanian and Ruthenian lands to the Polish Crown. However, the various other treaties which followed this treaty actually meant the takeover and Polonization of Lithuania too. A significant resolution was the adoption of Polish administrative divisions and offices like voivode and castellan by Lithuania. Even more important was that in total 47 selected Lithuanian nobles were adopted by Polish nobles heraldic families and granted Polish coats of arm. This symbolic gesture signified their desire to adopt Polish customs and integrate into Polish society. Because of this possibility of heraldic adoption, Poland had a much higher proportion of nobles than other European kingdoms. In Poland, the proportion of nobles in the total population was already 10-15% in the 16th century, in the rest of Europe it was 1%. Thus the Union of Krewo in 1385 signified the beginnings of the strengthened Polonization of Lithuania. Strengthened Polonization because the Polonization actually started before the Union of Krewo, because Lithuania was Christianized from Poland. Priests, especially from Poland, Christianized Lithuania and priests had great influence at that time, so there was already a Polish Influence in Lithuania before the Union of Krewo. So the Polonization of Lithuania started with the Christianization and was finally completed with the Union of Lublin. What was also good was that it was shown that the Polish king also ruled Sweden with Finland for a short time. Unfortunately, because of his inability, he lost control of Sweden and Finland again BUT...what is bad is that the video does not show that the Polish Empire ruled Russia in 1610. Unfortunately, the same king Sigismund III Vasa lost rule over Russia because of the same incompetence as he previously lost rule over Sweden and Finland. What is also negative is that the historically wrong term "Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth" is used, although at least Lithuania is shown as part of the Polish Empire, although the wrong term is used to name the state. Unfortunately, many people and historians use the wrong term commonwealth in connection with Polish history. You too! But the term Commonwealth is inappropriate because it gives the impression that the state was a common wealth for Poles and Lithuanians alike. So the common wealth served both nations equally. But in reality the Lithuanians had to submit to the Poles and were largely Polonized and thus assimilated. It was actually a Polish empire completely dominated by the Poles. Lithuania was completely dominated by the Polish Empire like also the Ruthenians who were the ancestors of the Belarusians and Ukrainians. Poles completely dominated them all. The Lithuanians were voluntarily polonized and the Ruthenians partly too. All relevant was Polish like also the Polish currency Polski Złoty. Złoty means golden in Polish. The capitals of the entire state were the Polish cities of Krakow and Warsaw. The ruling Poles have also determined what the state should be called Polisch Rzeczpospolita! The Polish name was then adopted by the Lithuanians into the Lithuanian languages as "Žečpospolita". By the way, Polish term for nobility ”szlachta” was also adopted into Lithuanian as ”šlėkta” like many other Polish words. The majority of the loanwords in Lithuanian were from Polish. Polish dominance about the Lithuanians, so also about the Ruthenians illustrates also that the Polish king automatically became the grand duke of Lithuania. That was by far not the only additional title of the Polish kings. For example, the Polish King Sigismund III Vasa had in addition to the Polish royal title, Grand Duke of Lithuania and Grand Duke of Finland, Prince of Rus, Prussia, Mazovia, Volhynia, Podolia, Podlaskie, Severia, Czernihów, Samogitia, Livonia, also Hereditary King of Sweden. Rus stands for Russia because the Poles ruled large areas of Russia at the time, and even Moscow was briefly occupied by Polish troops. Samogitia stands for the Baltic States, which the Polish king largely ruled. Hereditary king of Sweden and Grand Duke of Finland because the Polish king was also the king of Sweden for a short time. But he lost the power in Sweden and Finland. This list of titles makes it clear that Grand Duke of Lithuania was just one of the many titles of the Polish king. But the most important title was always King of Poland. In the end, the title Grand Duke of Lithuania was just one of many Polish king's titles. The title was particularly important only at the beginning of the Polish rule over Lithuania, when the Lithuanian nobility was not yet Polonized. At that time the Poles still had to pretend the Lithuanian nobility that this was not a takeover. The treaty of Krewo for personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385 was the first step in Poland's takeover of Lithuania. This union was declared indissoluble. This personal union meant that the Polish king should also be the ruler of Lithuania. In fact, the union treaty also contained the provision of the attaching of Lithuanian and Ruthenian lands to the Polish Crown. However, the various other treaties which followed this treaty actually meant the takeover and Polonization of Lithuania too. A significant resolution was that in total 47 selected Lithuanian nobles were adopted by Polish nobles heraldic families and granted Polish coats of arm. This symbolic gesture signified their desire to adopt Polish customs and integrate into Polish society. This was part of Poland's significantly increased Polonization of Lithuania. Thus the Union of Krewo in 1385 signified the beginnings of the strengthened Polonization of Lithuania. Strengthened Polonization because the Polonization actually started before the Union of Krewo, because Lithuania was Christianized from Poland. Priests, especially from Poland, Christianized Lithuania and priests had great influence at that time, so there was already a Polish Influence in Lithuania before the Union of Krewo. So the Polonization of Lithuania started with the Christianization and was finally completed with the Union of Lublin. Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is absolutely wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire which was completely dominated by the Poles and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. In any case, it would make sense to use the Polish proper name Rzeczpospolita as a designation for this state, which was actually still internationally common in the 19th century when talking about Poland before the partitions. The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term.
@molly2364Ай бұрын
@@GreatPolishWingedHussars i aint reading allat
@GreatPolishWingedHussarsАй бұрын
@@molly2364 Then you won’t get the information!
@felipedeoliveiragomesolive72472 жыл бұрын
Amazing evolutions the Poland wars 🇧🇷
@user-us1tj1wz7w7 ай бұрын
Dzięki zrobiliście to bardzo pomysłowo i do lepszego zrozumienia dla wszystkich pozdrawiam
@krzechix84852 жыл бұрын
A gdzie niedawny incydent z czeską kapliczką? Xd
@vincentbj842 жыл бұрын
Good job
@bojan64492 жыл бұрын
Respect from Macedonia 🇲🇰
@youtubesangryopinionramble14652 жыл бұрын
4:43 When the wild fields opened up to the Winged Hussars
@GreatPolishWingedHussars Жыл бұрын
By the way, the video is actually pretty good! Lithuania is shown as part of the Polish Empire since the 1385 treaty of Krewo, as are other territories. Because of the personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385, Poland became an empire and Lithuania, like other territories, was part of the Polish Empire. The treaty of Krewo for personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385 was the first step in Poland's takeover of Lithuania. This union was declared indissoluble. This personal union meant that the Polish king should also be the ruler of Lithuania. In fact, the union treaty also contained the provision of the attaching of Lithuanian and Ruthenian lands to the Polish Crown. However, the various other treaties which followed this treaty actually meant the takeover and Polonization of Lithuania too. A significant resolution was the adoption of Polish administrative divisions and offices like voivode and castellan by Lithuania. Even more important was that in total 47 selected Lithuanian nobles were adopted by Polish nobles heraldic families and granted Polish coats of arm. This symbolic gesture signified their desire to adopt Polish customs and integrate into Polish society. Because of this possibility of heraldic adoption, Poland had a much higher proportion of nobles than other European kingdoms. In Poland, the proportion of nobles in the total population was already 10-15% in the 16th century, in the rest of Europe it was 1%. Thus the Union of Krewo in 1385 signified the beginnings of the strengthened Polonization of Lithuania. Strengthened Polonization because the Polonization actually started before the Union of Krewo, because Lithuania was Christianized from Poland. Priests, especially from Poland, Christianized Lithuania and priests had great influence at that time, so there was already a Polish Influence in Lithuania before the Union of Krewo. So the Polonization of Lithuania started with the Christianization and was finally completed with the Union of Lublin. What was also good was that it was shown that the Polish king also ruled Sweden with Finland for a short time. Unfortunately, because of his inability, he lost control of Sweden and Finland again BUT...what is bad is that the video does not show that the Polish Empire ruled Russia in 1610. Unfortunately, the same king Sigismund III Vasa lost rule over Russia because of the same incompetence as he previously lost rule over Sweden and Finland. What is also negative is that the historically wrong term "Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth" is used, although at least Lithuania is shown as part of the Polish Empire, although the wrong term is used to name the state. Unfortunately, many people and historians use the wrong term commonwealth in connection with Polish history. You too! But the term Commonwealth is inappropriate because it gives the impression that the state was a common wealth for Poles and Lithuanians alike. So the common wealth served both nations equally. But in reality the Lithuanians had to submit to the Poles and were largely Polonized and thus assimilated. It was actually a Polish empire completely dominated by the Poles. Lithuania was completely dominated by the Polish Empire like also the Ruthenians who were the ancestors of the Belarusians and Ukrainians. Poles completely dominated them all. The Lithuanians were voluntarily polonized and the Ruthenians partly too. All relevant was Polish like also the Polish currency Polski Złoty. Złoty means golden in Polish. The capitals of the entire state were the Polish cities of Krakow and Warsaw. The ruling Poles have also determined what the state should be called Polisch Rzeczpospolita! The Polish name was then adopted by the Lithuanians into the Lithuanian languages as "Žečpospolita". By the way, Polish term for nobility ”szlachta” was also adopted into Lithuanian as ”šlėkta” like many other Polish words. The majority of the loanwords in Lithuanian were from Polish. Polish dominance about the Lithuanians, so also about the Ruthenians illustrates also that the Polish king automatically became the grand duke of Lithuania. That was by far not the only additional title of the Polish kings. For example, the Polish King Sigismund III Vasa had in addition to the Polish royal title, Grand Duke of Lithuania and Grand Duke of Finland, Prince of Rus, Prussia, Mazovia, Volhynia, Podolia, Podlaskie, Severia, Czernihów, Samogitia, Livonia, also Hereditary King of Sweden. Rus stands for Russia because the Poles ruled large areas of Russia at the time, and even Moscow was briefly occupied by Polish troops. Samogitia stands for the Baltic States, which the Polish king largely ruled. Hereditary king of Sweden and Grand Duke of Finland because the Polish king was also the king of Sweden for a short time. But he lost the power in Sweden and Finland. This list of titles makes it clear that Grand Duke of Lithuania was just one of the many titles of the Polish king. But the most important title was always King of Poland. In the end, the title Grand Duke of Lithuania was just one of many Polish king's titles. The title was particularly important only at the beginning of the Polish rule over Lithuania, when the Lithuanian nobility was not yet Polonized. At that time the Poles still had to pretend the Lithuanian nobility that this was not a takeover. The treaty of Krewo for personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385 was the first step in Poland's takeover of Lithuania. This union was declared indissoluble. This personal union meant that the Polish king should also be the ruler of Lithuania. In fact, the union treaty also contained the provision of the attaching of Lithuanian and Ruthenian lands to the Polish Crown. However, the various other treaties which followed this treaty actually meant the takeover and Polonization of Lithuania too. A significant resolution was that in total 47 selected Lithuanian nobles were adopted by Polish nobles heraldic families and granted Polish coats of arm. This symbolic gesture signified their desire to adopt Polish customs and integrate into Polish society. This was part of Poland's significantly increased Polonization of Lithuania. Thus the Union of Krewo in 1385 signified the beginnings of the strengthened Polonization of Lithuania. Strengthened Polonization because the Polonization actually started before the Union of Krewo, because Lithuania was Christianized from Poland. Priests, especially from Poland, Christianized Lithuania and priests had great influence at that time, so there was already a Polish Influence in Lithuania before the Union of Krewo. So the Polonization of Lithuania started with the Christianization and was finally completed with the Union of Lublin. Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is absolutely wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire which was completely dominated by the Poles and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. In any case, it would make sense to use the Polish proper name Rzeczpospolita as a designation for this state, which was actually still internationally common in the 19th century when talking about Poland before the partitions. The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term.
@volokoshevoy10992 жыл бұрын
Zaskakująca i nie sprawiedliwa Historia Polski. Ale takie jest życie. Bardzo chciałbym odwiedzić Polske jako turysta. Pozdrowienia z Rosji ✌️ze światem 🇵🇱🇷🇺
@LauraArniman2 жыл бұрын
Sprawiedliwa, dupki się kłócili o władzę, cuckold Poniatowski latał za carycą Katarzyną zamiast się krajem zajmować, to się skończyło tak jak się to musiało skończyć...
@Kapitalistyczna_Polska2 жыл бұрын
@@LauraArniman Polacy sami sobie taki los zgotowali
@volokoshevoy10992 жыл бұрын
@Estonex mapper Nicht
@volokoshevoy10992 жыл бұрын
@Estonex mapper No. сам пью сам гуляю сам стелюся сам лягаю
@volokoshevoy10992 жыл бұрын
@Estonex mapper And who are you, an Estonian?
@justmynickname2 жыл бұрын
Great work ;-)
@Judah1322 жыл бұрын
idk why, but I've got like a "thing" for administrative devisions
@ghostduty83592 жыл бұрын
The polish are tho gone who will never lose their claim of their land even if you conquer all of them for 500 years in Eu4 :v
@GreatPolishWingedHussars Жыл бұрын
By the way, the video is actually pretty good! Lithuania is shown as part of the Polish Empire since the 1385 treaty of Krewo, as are other territories. Because of the personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385, Poland became an empire and Lithuania, like other territories, was part of the Polish Empire. The treaty of Krewo for personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385 was the first step in Poland's takeover of Lithuania. This union was declared indissoluble. This personal union meant that the Polish king should also be the ruler of Lithuania. In fact, the union treaty also contained the provision of the attaching of Lithuanian and Ruthenian lands to the Polish Crown. However, the various other treaties which followed this treaty actually meant the takeover and Polonization of Lithuania too. A significant resolution was the adoption of Polish administrative divisions and offices like voivode and castellan by Lithuania. Even more important was that in total 47 selected Lithuanian nobles were adopted by Polish nobles heraldic families and granted Polish coats of arm. This symbolic gesture signified their desire to adopt Polish customs and integrate into Polish society. Because of this possibility of heraldic adoption, Poland had a much higher proportion of nobles than other European kingdoms. In Poland, the proportion of nobles in the total population was already 10-15% in the 16th century, in the rest of Europe it was 1%. Thus the Union of Krewo in 1385 signified the beginnings of the strengthened Polonization of Lithuania. Strengthened Polonization because the Polonization actually started before the Union of Krewo, because Lithuania was Christianized from Poland. Priests, especially from Poland, Christianized Lithuania and priests had great influence at that time, so there was already a Polish Influence in Lithuania before the Union of Krewo. So the Polonization of Lithuania started with the Christianization and was finally completed with the Union of Lublin. What was also good was that it was shown that the Polish king also ruled Sweden with Finland for a short time. Unfortunately, because of his inability, he lost control of Sweden and Finland again BUT...what is bad is that the video does not show that the Polish Empire ruled Russia in 1610. Unfortunately, the same king Sigismund III Vasa lost rule over Russia because of the same incompetence as he previously lost rule over Sweden and Finland. What is also negative is that the historically wrong term "Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth" is used, although at least Lithuania is shown as part of the Polish Empire, although the wrong term is used to name the state. Unfortunately, many people and historians use the wrong term commonwealth in connection with Polish history. You too! But the term Commonwealth is inappropriate because it gives the impression that the state was a common wealth for Poles and Lithuanians alike. So the common wealth served both nations equally. But in reality the Lithuanians had to submit to the Poles and were largely Polonized and thus assimilated. It was actually a Polish empire completely dominated by the Poles. Lithuania was completely dominated by the Polish Empire like also the Ruthenians who were the ancestors of the Belarusians and Ukrainians. Poles completely dominated them all. The Lithuanians were voluntarily polonized and the Ruthenians partly too. All relevant was Polish like also the Polish currency Polski Złoty. Złoty means golden in Polish. The capitals of the entire state were the Polish cities of Krakow and Warsaw. The ruling Poles have also determined what the state should be called Polisch Rzeczpospolita! The Polish name was then adopted by the Lithuanians into the Lithuanian languages as "Žečpospolita". By the way, Polish term for nobility ”szlachta” was also adopted into Lithuanian as ”šlėkta” like many other Polish words. The majority of the loanwords in Lithuanian were from Polish. Polish dominance about the Lithuanians, so also about the Ruthenians illustrates also that the Polish king automatically became the grand duke of Lithuania. That was by far not the only additional title of the Polish kings. For example, the Polish King Sigismund III Vasa had in addition to the Polish royal title, Grand Duke of Lithuania and Grand Duke of Finland, Prince of Rus, Prussia, Mazovia, Volhynia, Podolia, Podlaskie, Severia, Czernihów, Samogitia, Livonia, also Hereditary King of Sweden. Rus stands for Russia because the Poles ruled large areas of Russia at the time, and even Moscow was briefly occupied by Polish troops. Samogitia stands for the Baltic States, which the Polish king largely ruled. Hereditary king of Sweden and Grand Duke of Finland because the Polish king was also the king of Sweden for a short time. But he lost the power in Sweden and Finland. This list of titles makes it clear that Grand Duke of Lithuania was just one of the many titles of the Polish king. But the most important title was always King of Poland. In the end, the title Grand Duke of Lithuania was just one of many Polish king's titles. The title was particularly important only at the beginning of the Polish rule over Lithuania, when the Lithuanian nobility was not yet Polonized. At that time the Poles still had to pretend the Lithuanian nobility that this was not a takeover. The treaty of Krewo for personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385 was the first step in Poland's takeover of Lithuania. This union was declared indissoluble. This personal union meant that the Polish king should also be the ruler of Lithuania. In fact, the union treaty also contained the provision of the attaching of Lithuanian and Ruthenian lands to the Polish Crown. However, the various other treaties which followed this treaty actually meant the takeover and Polonization of Lithuania too. A significant resolution was that in total 47 selected Lithuanian nobles were adopted by Polish nobles heraldic families and granted Polish coats of arm. This symbolic gesture signified their desire to adopt Polish customs and integrate into Polish society. This was part of Poland's significantly increased Polonization of Lithuania. Thus the Union of Krewo in 1385 signified the beginnings of the strengthened Polonization of Lithuania. Strengthened Polonization because the Polonization actually started before the Union of Krewo, because Lithuania was Christianized from Poland. Priests, especially from Poland, Christianized Lithuania and priests had great influence at that time, so there was already a Polish Influence in Lithuania before the Union of Krewo. So the Polonization of Lithuania started with the Christianization and was finally completed with the Union of Lublin. Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is absolutely wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire which was completely dominated by the Poles and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. In any case, it would make sense to use the Polish proper name Rzeczpospolita as a designation for this state, which was actually still internationally common in the 19th century when talking about Poland before the partitions. The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term.
@ghostduty8359 Жыл бұрын
@@GreatPolishWingedHussars man who the fuck asked u to copy the entirity of wikipedia .-.
@DieterRahm18452 жыл бұрын
1466: Prussia enters the chat Poland: Damn!
@plusxz8212 жыл бұрын
Yikes i'm in danger
@brmf43462 жыл бұрын
Duke Konrad of Masovia invited the Teutonic Knights in the early XIII century which lead to 300 years of conflict and 1525 creation of protestant Prussia after final Knights' defeat by Poland which ended up partitioning our country. Talk about bad choices...
@Vinzu14962 жыл бұрын
@@brmf4346 Konrad of Masovia arguably worst ever ruler of Poland. Although there were a lot of bad so maybe worst medieval one
@gidusR2 жыл бұрын
Prusy zostały na mapie dzięki Polsce, później nam podziękowali
@zepter002 жыл бұрын
Prussia was Poliah vassal. Ruler of Prussia was u der Polish king rule.
@piotrsarnowski48247 ай бұрын
Ciekawy materiał :)
@AquaranSocialistRepublic Жыл бұрын
Since the 18th century, Poland has been treated sort of like the punching bag of Europe. They got conquered so many times for the most pointless reasons ever. If I was born Polish, which I wasn't, I would have literally weeped at the 1939 invasion. Even as an American, I still feel bad for any nation that was mistreated.
@wiqu1010 ай бұрын
Thank you for understanding us my dog😀
@rafexrafexowski47548 ай бұрын
France decided that letting Germany conquer Poland and using the Maginot line and the naval blockade to starve them out like in WW1 would be a better option than an invasion from the west, which would have caused a lot more casualties and been more risky. They did not predict that Germany would make an agreement with the Soviet Union, allowing the Germans to conquer France thanks to their new trading ally. Very unfortunate mistake.
@tottot59247 ай бұрын
@@rafexrafexowski4754 So the USSR proposed Entente 2.0 in 1938. France agreed, but Britain refused. What do you think the USSR should have done? Give western Belarus and Ukraine to the Germans? So that we could then lose the war. The plain that runs from Poland to the Urals is very difficult to defend. Everyone wants to protect their country. The USSR was afraid that capitalist Europe would attack. The Axis (NATO) is afraid that the USSR will attack.
@rafexrafexowski47547 ай бұрын
@@tottot5924 I'm not saying that a German-Soviet alliance in 1939 was not a smart move. It for sure was one. France and Britain however did not predict that the Germans would ever set aside their ideological differences with the Soviets and sign a non-aggression pact. This simply seemed like a decision against the ideological goals of both sides.
@tottot59247 ай бұрын
@@rafexrafexowski4754 The USSR could be attacked from two sides. It seems logical to me that the USSR signed a non-aggression pact. The USSR helped China so that Japan would get stuck there and would not be able to strike with all its might. And the European countries thought that they could cope with Hitler themselves. Then all of Europe would be under their influence. France, Britain and the USSR did not agree on this. And this was very beneficial for Hitler.
@Dydl2 жыл бұрын
Good
@Ebreh2 жыл бұрын
о, Дудл, тоже в реки залетело?
@Dydl2 жыл бұрын
@@Ebreh да
@CYbeRuKRaINiaN2 жыл бұрын
Дудл, і ти тут, лол
@SlavaUkraini_2 жыл бұрын
Привет, Дудл. Удачи тебе !
@Dydl2 жыл бұрын
@@SlavaUkraini_ спасибо
@Ozdoba2673 жыл бұрын
Jej potencjał wielki on tak dalej jesteś super yutoberem beńdzie coś o Bałkanach ?
@QarolMapping3 жыл бұрын
Może kiedyś będzie
@wiqu107 ай бұрын
Kingdom of Poland 1295-1296 1812-1815???
@thegallanonim2 жыл бұрын
W ogóle nie uwzględniono zmian granicy polsko-słowackiej w XX wieku, przez co w filmiku terytoria, które obecnie są w Polsce, są przedstawione jako słowackie
@infsai2 жыл бұрын
9:06 Republic of Tarnobrzeg
@podchalanskipopylacz2 жыл бұрын
Good job!
@GreatPolishWingedHussars Жыл бұрын
By the way, the video is actually pretty good! Lithuania is shown as part of the Polish Empire since the 1385 treaty of Krewo, as are other territories. Because of the personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385, Poland became an empire and Lithuania, like other territories, was part of the Polish Empire. The treaty of Krewo for personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385 was the first step in Poland's takeover of Lithuania. This union was declared indissoluble. This personal union meant that the Polish king should also be the ruler of Lithuania. In fact, the union treaty also contained the provision of the attaching of Lithuanian and Ruthenian lands to the Polish Crown. However, the various other treaties which followed this treaty actually meant the takeover and Polonization of Lithuania too. A significant resolution was the adoption of Polish administrative divisions and offices like voivode and castellan by Lithuania. Even more important was that in total 47 selected Lithuanian nobles were adopted by Polish nobles heraldic families and granted Polish coats of arm. This symbolic gesture signified their desire to adopt Polish customs and integrate into Polish society. Because of this possibility of heraldic adoption, Poland had a much higher proportion of nobles than other European kingdoms. In Poland, the proportion of nobles in the total population was already 10-15% in the 16th century, in the rest of Europe it was 1%. Thus the Union of Krewo in 1385 signified the beginnings of the strengthened Polonization of Lithuania. Strengthened Polonization because the Polonization actually started before the Union of Krewo, because Lithuania was Christianized from Poland. Priests, especially from Poland, Christianized Lithuania and priests had great influence at that time, so there was already a Polish Influence in Lithuania before the Union of Krewo. So the Polonization of Lithuania started with the Christianization and was finally completed with the Union of Lublin. What was also good was that it was shown that the Polish king also ruled Sweden with Finland for a short time. Unfortunately, because of his inability, he lost control of Sweden and Finland again BUT...what is bad is that the video does not show that the Polish Empire ruled Russia in 1610. Unfortunately, the same king Sigismund III Vasa lost rule over Russia because of the same incompetence as he previously lost rule over Sweden and Finland. What is also negative is that the historically wrong term "Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth" is used, although at least Lithuania is shown as part of the Polish Empire, although the wrong term is used to name the state. Unfortunately, many people and historians use the wrong term commonwealth in connection with Polish history. You too! But the term Commonwealth is inappropriate because it gives the impression that the state was a common wealth for Poles and Lithuanians alike. So the common wealth served both nations equally. But in reality the Lithuanians had to submit to the Poles and were largely Polonized and thus assimilated. It was actually a Polish empire completely dominated by the Poles. Lithuania was completely dominated by the Polish Empire like also the Ruthenians who were the ancestors of the Belarusians and Ukrainians. Poles completely dominated them all. The Lithuanians were voluntarily polonized and the Ruthenians partly too. All relevant was Polish like also the Polish currency Polski Złoty. Złoty means golden in Polish. The capitals of the entire state were the Polish cities of Krakow and Warsaw. The ruling Poles have also determined what the state should be called Polisch Rzeczpospolita! The Polish name was then adopted by the Lithuanians into the Lithuanian languages as "Žečpospolita". By the way, Polish term for nobility ”szlachta” was also adopted into Lithuanian as ”šlėkta” like many other Polish words. The majority of the loanwords in Lithuanian were from Polish. Polish dominance about the Lithuanians, so also about the Ruthenians illustrates also that the Polish king automatically became the grand duke of Lithuania. That was by far not the only additional title of the Polish kings. For example, the Polish King Sigismund III Vasa had in addition to the Polish royal title, Grand Duke of Lithuania and Grand Duke of Finland, Prince of Rus, Prussia, Mazovia, Volhynia, Podolia, Podlaskie, Severia, Czernihów, Samogitia, Livonia, also Hereditary King of Sweden. Rus stands for Russia because the Poles ruled large areas of Russia at the time, and even Moscow was briefly occupied by Polish troops. Samogitia stands for the Baltic States, which the Polish king largely ruled. Hereditary king of Sweden and Grand Duke of Finland because the Polish king was also the king of Sweden for a short time. But he lost the power in Sweden and Finland. This list of titles makes it clear that Grand Duke of Lithuania was just one of the many titles of the Polish king. But the most important title was always King of Poland. In the end, the title Grand Duke of Lithuania was just one of many Polish king's titles. The title was particularly important only at the beginning of the Polish rule over Lithuania, when the Lithuanian nobility was not yet Polonized. At that time the Poles still had to pretend the Lithuanian nobility that this was not a takeover. The treaty of Krewo for personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385 was the first step in Poland's takeover of Lithuania. This union was declared indissoluble. This personal union meant that the Polish king should also be the ruler of Lithuania. In fact, the union treaty also contained the provision of the attaching of Lithuanian and Ruthenian lands to the Polish Crown. However, the various other treaties which followed this treaty actually meant the takeover and Polonization of Lithuania too. A significant resolution was that in total 47 selected Lithuanian nobles were adopted by Polish nobles heraldic families and granted Polish coats of arm. This symbolic gesture signified their desire to adopt Polish customs and integrate into Polish society. This was part of Poland's significantly increased Polonization of Lithuania. Thus the Union of Krewo in 1385 signified the beginnings of the strengthened Polonization of Lithuania. Strengthened Polonization because the Polonization actually started before the Union of Krewo, because Lithuania was Christianized from Poland. Priests, especially from Poland, Christianized Lithuania and priests had great influence at that time, so there was already a Polish Influence in Lithuania before the Union of Krewo. So the Polonization of Lithuania started with the Christianization and was finally completed with the Union of Lublin. Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is absolutely wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire which was completely dominated by the Poles and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. In any case, it would make sense to use the Polish proper name Rzeczpospolita as a designation for this state, which was actually still internationally common in the 19th century when talking about Poland before the partitions. The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term.
@kamilkramek96362 жыл бұрын
Świetny film 😎👍🇵🇱
@user-nf6lq7ew4z2 жыл бұрын
А я бы там шаурму съел острую три штуки в обычном лаваше
@dompedroii46562 жыл бұрын
Great video
@user-yj3bq2ki5m2 жыл бұрын
7:18 1702-1704 Semen Paliy rebelion 1704-1708 Braclaw and Kyiv vojevodstvo was under Mazepa control
@lukasuhlenkamp98502 жыл бұрын
2:28 anybody have a link to this song?
@QarolMapping2 жыл бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/kOCKZNSevcCmpY0.html
@aragveli29852 жыл бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/o9JhlNKQtq7NfYU.html
@danielmerklin50822 жыл бұрын
Hej sokoly
@baliczek45682 жыл бұрын
Jaxa i PKN-T, mój dzień stał się lepszy
@og_sloff2 жыл бұрын
Super odcinek
@cakeisyummy57552 жыл бұрын
I love how Poland is just.... Gone at some Points.
@KowalskyLeon2 жыл бұрын
So you have to be very unlucky today, you a.....e..
@walterweiss71247 ай бұрын
now you just.... go
@pa14662 жыл бұрын
Prusy stały się Prusami dopiero w 1525 roku i wtedy stał się zalezne od rp
@exclibrion2 жыл бұрын
Region Prus od zawsze się tak nazywał. Po prostu wcześniej był częścią zakonu krzyżackiego.
@pa14662 жыл бұрын
@@exclibrion wcześniej nie byly to prusy a plemiona pruskie które zamieszkiwały tereny pomazanii pogezanii bartii sambi i wielu innych
@telefon81022 жыл бұрын
@@pa1466 Prusy książęce
@gacy15462 жыл бұрын
@@pa1466 region ten od zawsze nazywany był Prusami. Wpierw należał do pogańskich plemion bałtów- Prusów, następnie przeszedł w ręce Zakonu Krzyżackiego, by później stać się zależnym od Królestwa Polskiego. Po 3 rozbiorze Polski Prusy stały się już pełnoprawną własnością rodziny Hohenzollerów, od tamtej pory mieszkańców prus będziemy nazywać Prusakami aż do zjednoczenia Niemiec. Chyba nie muszę pisać co było dalej.
@pa14662 жыл бұрын
@@gacy1546 prusy książęce uniezależniły się od RP w 1680
@shamilfsobhanstandwithukra3937 Жыл бұрын
LOVE POLAND FROM THAILAND
@user-vo8nz2yn3y3 жыл бұрын
nice video
@starjp84292 жыл бұрын
I'm Japanese, living in the country of fixed national border, have many many questions.
@GreatPolishWingedHussars Жыл бұрын
By the way, the video is actually pretty good! Lithuania is shown as part of the Polish Empire since the 1385 treaty of Krewo, as are other territories. Because of the personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385, Poland became an empire and Lithuania, like other territories, was part of the Polish Empire. The treaty of Krewo for personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385 was the first step in Poland's takeover of Lithuania. This union was declared indissoluble. This personal union meant that the Polish king should also be the ruler of Lithuania. In fact, the union treaty also contained the provision of the attaching of Lithuanian and Ruthenian lands to the Polish Crown. However, the various other treaties which followed this treaty actually meant the takeover and Polonization of Lithuania too. A significant resolution was the adoption of Polish administrative divisions and offices like voivode and castellan by Lithuania. Even more important was that in total 47 selected Lithuanian nobles were adopted by Polish nobles heraldic families and granted Polish coats of arm. This symbolic gesture signified their desire to adopt Polish customs and integrate into Polish society. Because of this possibility of heraldic adoption, Poland had a much higher proportion of nobles than other European kingdoms. In Poland, the proportion of nobles in the total population was already 10-15% in the 16th century, in the rest of Europe it was 1%. Thus the Union of Krewo in 1385 signified the beginnings of the strengthened Polonization of Lithuania. Strengthened Polonization because the Polonization actually started before the Union of Krewo, because Lithuania was Christianized from Poland. Priests, especially from Poland, Christianized Lithuania and priests had great influence at that time, so there was already a Polish Influence in Lithuania before the Union of Krewo. So the Polonization of Lithuania started with the Christianization and was finally completed with the Union of Lublin. What was also good was that it was shown that the Polish king also ruled Sweden with Finland for a short time. Unfortunately, because of his inability, he lost control of Sweden and Finland again BUT...what is bad is that the video does not show that the Polish Empire ruled Russia in 1610. Unfortunately, the same king Sigismund III Vasa lost rule over Russia because of the same incompetence as he previously lost rule over Sweden and Finland. What is also negative is that the historically wrong term "Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth" is used, although at least Lithuania is shown as part of the Polish Empire, although the wrong term is used to name the state. Unfortunately, many people and historians use the wrong term commonwealth in connection with Polish history. You too! But the term Commonwealth is inappropriate because it gives the impression that the state was a common wealth for Poles and Lithuanians alike. So the common wealth served both nations equally. But in reality the Lithuanians had to submit to the Poles and were largely Polonized and thus assimilated. It was actually a Polish empire completely dominated by the Poles. Lithuania was completely dominated by the Polish Empire like also the Ruthenians who were the ancestors of the Belarusians and Ukrainians. Poles completely dominated them all. The Lithuanians were voluntarily polonized and the Ruthenians partly too. All relevant was Polish like also the Polish currency Polski Złoty. Złoty means golden in Polish. The capitals of the entire state were the Polish cities of Krakow and Warsaw. The ruling Poles have also determined what the state should be called Polisch Rzeczpospolita! The Polish name was then adopted by the Lithuanians into the Lithuanian languages as "Žečpospolita". By the way, Polish term for nobility ”szlachta” was also adopted into Lithuanian as ”šlėkta” like many other Polish words. The majority of the loanwords in Lithuanian were from Polish. Polish dominance about the Lithuanians, so also about the Ruthenians illustrates also that the Polish king automatically became the grand duke of Lithuania. That was by far not the only additional title of the Polish kings. For example, the Polish King Sigismund III Vasa had in addition to the Polish royal title, Grand Duke of Lithuania and Grand Duke of Finland, Prince of Rus, Prussia, Mazovia, Volhynia, Podolia, Podlaskie, Severia, Czernihów, Samogitia, Livonia, also Hereditary King of Sweden. Rus stands for Russia because the Poles ruled large areas of Russia at the time, and even Moscow was briefly occupied by Polish troops. Samogitia stands for the Baltic States, which the Polish king largely ruled. Hereditary king of Sweden and Grand Duke of Finland because the Polish king was also the king of Sweden for a short time. But he lost the power in Sweden and Finland. This list of titles makes it clear that Grand Duke of Lithuania was just one of the many titles of the Polish king. But the most important title was always King of Poland. In the end, the title Grand Duke of Lithuania was just one of many Polish king's titles. The title was particularly important only at the beginning of the Polish rule over Lithuania, when the Lithuanian nobility was not yet Polonized. At that time the Poles still had to pretend the Lithuanian nobility that this was not a takeover. The treaty of Krewo for personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385 was the first step in Poland's takeover of Lithuania. This union was declared indissoluble. This personal union meant that the Polish king should also be the ruler of Lithuania. In fact, the union treaty also contained the provision of the attaching of Lithuanian and Ruthenian lands to the Polish Crown. However, the various other treaties which followed this treaty actually meant the takeover and Polonization of Lithuania too. A significant resolution was that in total 47 selected Lithuanian nobles were adopted by Polish nobles heraldic families and granted Polish coats of arm. This symbolic gesture signified their desire to adopt Polish customs and integrate into Polish society. This was part of Poland's significantly increased Polonization of Lithuania. Thus the Union of Krewo in 1385 signified the beginnings of the strengthened Polonization of Lithuania. Strengthened Polonization because the Polonization actually started before the Union of Krewo, because Lithuania was Christianized from Poland. Priests, especially from Poland, Christianized Lithuania and priests had great influence at that time, so there was already a Polish Influence in Lithuania before the Union of Krewo. So the Polonization of Lithuania started with the Christianization and was finally completed with the Union of Lublin. Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is absolutely wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire which was completely dominated by the Poles and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. In any case, it would make sense to use the Polish proper name Rzeczpospolita as a designation for this state, which was actually still internationally common in the 19th century when talking about Poland before the partitions. The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term.
@walterweiss71247 ай бұрын
no, it was a personal union in Jagiellon times: means two countries under one monarch; Lithuania was part of the Republic after 1569@@GreatPolishWingedHussars
@GreatPolishWingedHussars7 ай бұрын
@@walterweiss7124 Yes, this personal union meant the Polonization of Lithuania and Lithuania was therefore no longer an independent country, but part of the Polish Empire.
@thiago08005 ай бұрын
Glory for polska, from Brazil
@roccoaelijahnewman55642 жыл бұрын
Poland in the 1920's: CHANGING PRIME MINISTIRS
@laris80672 жыл бұрын
Dziękujemy
@Ottoman_mapper_532 жыл бұрын
Nice video but one small mistake, Prussia became Prussia in 1526 and before it was the Teutonic order and the house of Hohenzoller replaced the Order
@walterweiss71247 ай бұрын
for tolerating these heretics king Sigismund was almost 500 years in purgatory
@Mentlegenium2 жыл бұрын
Please, could you tell me the name of the song at the republic era?
@QarolMapping2 жыл бұрын
"Wyklęci Niezłomni"
@Mentlegenium2 жыл бұрын
@@QarolMapping Dziękuję!
@Mr.DalekLK2 жыл бұрын
Nice.
@HouseOfValsburg3 ай бұрын
8:30 This synced so well Edit: These 2 aswell 6:31 6:14
@barbarasierota83842 жыл бұрын
Polska, naród. Nie ma takiego. Są cudowni. Pełne miłości. Na granicy. Boli serce. Dialog, z góry. Może rozwiązać konflikt
@olafjansowidz7 ай бұрын
Szczochy
@user-fq1uu3rx2v2 жыл бұрын
3:00 Как музыка называется? / What is the song called?
@wylogujsiezkontamordo87252 жыл бұрын
Hej sokoły! (Hey falcons! in english,dont know if you need XD)
@aragveli29852 жыл бұрын
Українська пісня Вступ: | G | D H7 | Em | H7 Em H7 Em | Em Гей, десь там, де чорні води, H7 Сів на коня козак молодий. Em Плаче молода дівчина,* H7 Em H7 G D ** Їде козак з Укра_ їни. Приспів: G Гей, гей, гей, соколи, D H7 Оминайте гори, ліси, доли. Em Дзвінь, дзвінь, дзвінь, дзвіночку, H7 Em H7 G D Степовий жайво_ ро_ ночку! G Гей, гей, гей, соколи, D H7 Оминайте гори, ліси, доли. Em Дзвінь, дзвінь, дзвінь, дзвіночку, H7 Em H7 Em Мій степовий, дзвінь, дзвінь, дзвінь! Жаль, жаль, за милою, За рідною стороною. Жаль, жаль, серце плаче, Більше її не побачу. Приспів. Плаче, плаче, дівчинонька, Люба моя ластівонька. А я у чужому краю, Серце спокою не має. Приспів. Меду-вина наливайте. Як загину - поховайте На далекій Україні Коло милої дівчини. Приспів.
@jakubbezimienia64492 жыл бұрын
Ale żeby tak zapomnieć o Przemyśle II?
@salvadorhenriquez40912 жыл бұрын
How did they got to portrait people so well in the early ages?
@anhey29432 жыл бұрын
They didn't. Portraits of rulers from before 16th century, used in this video, were drawn in the 19th century. Honestly it boggles my mind that people still use those depictions, but then again, parts of this video are based entirely on imagination so it's quite fitting.
@salvadorhenriquez40912 жыл бұрын
@@anhey2943 soooo, we don't really know how they looked like?
@GreatPolishWingedHussars Жыл бұрын
By the way, the video is actually pretty good! Lithuania is shown as part of the Polish Empire since the 1385 treaty of Krewo, as are other territories. Because of the personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385, Poland became an empire and Lithuania, like other territories, was part of the Polish Empire. The treaty of Krewo for personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385 was the first step in Poland's takeover of Lithuania. This union was declared indissoluble. This personal union meant that the Polish king should also be the ruler of Lithuania. In fact, the union treaty also contained the provision of the attaching of Lithuanian and Ruthenian lands to the Polish Crown. However, the various other treaties which followed this treaty actually meant the takeover and Polonization of Lithuania too. A significant resolution was the adoption of Polish administrative divisions and offices like voivode and castellan by Lithuania. Even more important was that in total 47 selected Lithuanian nobles were adopted by Polish nobles heraldic families and granted Polish coats of arm. This symbolic gesture signified their desire to adopt Polish customs and integrate into Polish society. Because of this possibility of heraldic adoption, Poland had a much higher proportion of nobles than other European kingdoms. In Poland, the proportion of nobles in the total population was already 10-15% in the 16th century, in the rest of Europe it was 1%. Thus the Union of Krewo in 1385 signified the beginnings of the strengthened Polonization of Lithuania. Strengthened Polonization because the Polonization actually started before the Union of Krewo, because Lithuania was Christianized from Poland. Priests, especially from Poland, Christianized Lithuania and priests had great influence at that time, so there was already a Polish Influence in Lithuania before the Union of Krewo. So the Polonization of Lithuania started with the Christianization and was finally completed with the Union of Lublin. What was also good was that it was shown that the Polish king also ruled Sweden with Finland for a short time. Unfortunately, because of his inability, he lost control of Sweden and Finland again BUT...what is bad is that the video does not show that the Polish Empire ruled Russia in 1610. Unfortunately, the same king Sigismund III Vasa lost rule over Russia because of the same incompetence as he previously lost rule over Sweden and Finland. What is also negative is that the historically wrong term "Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth" is used, although at least Lithuania is shown as part of the Polish Empire, although the wrong term is used to name the state. Unfortunately, many people and historians use the wrong term commonwealth in connection with Polish history. You too! But the term Commonwealth is inappropriate because it gives the impression that the state was a common wealth for Poles and Lithuanians alike. So the common wealth served both nations equally. But in reality the Lithuanians had to submit to the Poles and were largely Polonized and thus assimilated. It was actually a Polish empire completely dominated by the Poles. Lithuania was completely dominated by the Polish Empire like also the Ruthenians who were the ancestors of the Belarusians and Ukrainians. Poles completely dominated them all. The Lithuanians were voluntarily polonized and the Ruthenians partly too. All relevant was Polish like also the Polish currency Polski Złoty. Złoty means golden in Polish. The capitals of the entire state were the Polish cities of Krakow and Warsaw. The ruling Poles have also determined what the state should be called Polisch Rzeczpospolita! The Polish name was then adopted by the Lithuanians into the Lithuanian languages as "Žečpospolita". By the way, Polish term for nobility ”szlachta” was also adopted into Lithuanian as ”šlėkta” like many other Polish words. The majority of the loanwords in Lithuanian were from Polish. Polish dominance about the Lithuanians, so also about the Ruthenians illustrates also that the Polish king automatically became the grand duke of Lithuania. That was by far not the only additional title of the Polish kings. For example, the Polish King Sigismund III Vasa had in addition to the Polish royal title, Grand Duke of Lithuania and Grand Duke of Finland, Prince of Rus, Prussia, Mazovia, Volhynia, Podolia, Podlaskie, Severia, Czernihów, Samogitia, Livonia, also Hereditary King of Sweden. Rus stands for Russia because the Poles ruled large areas of Russia at the time, and even Moscow was briefly occupied by Polish troops. Samogitia stands for the Baltic States, which the Polish king largely ruled. Hereditary king of Sweden and Grand Duke of Finland because the Polish king was also the king of Sweden for a short time. But he lost the power in Sweden and Finland. This list of titles makes it clear that Grand Duke of Lithuania was just one of the many titles of the Polish king. But the most important title was always King of Poland. In the end, the title Grand Duke of Lithuania was just one of many Polish king's titles. The title was particularly important only at the beginning of the Polish rule over Lithuania, when the Lithuanian nobility was not yet Polonized. At that time the Poles still had to pretend the Lithuanian nobility that this was not a takeover. The treaty of Krewo for personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385 was the first step in Poland's takeover of Lithuania. This union was declared indissoluble. This personal union meant that the Polish king should also be the ruler of Lithuania. In fact, the union treaty also contained the provision of the attaching of Lithuanian and Ruthenian lands to the Polish Crown. However, the various other treaties which followed this treaty actually meant the takeover and Polonization of Lithuania too. A significant resolution was that in total 47 selected Lithuanian nobles were adopted by Polish nobles heraldic families and granted Polish coats of arm. This symbolic gesture signified their desire to adopt Polish customs and integrate into Polish society. This was part of Poland's significantly increased Polonization of Lithuania. Thus the Union of Krewo in 1385 signified the beginnings of the strengthened Polonization of Lithuania. Strengthened Polonization because the Polonization actually started before the Union of Krewo, because Lithuania was Christianized from Poland. Priests, especially from Poland, Christianized Lithuania and priests had great influence at that time, so there was already a Polish Influence in Lithuania before the Union of Krewo. So the Polonization of Lithuania started with the Christianization and was finally completed with the Union of Lublin. Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is absolutely wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire which was completely dominated by the Poles and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. In any case, it would make sense to use the Polish proper name Rzeczpospolita as a designation for this state, which was actually still internationally common in the 19th century when talking about Poland before the partitions. The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term.
@salvadorhenriquez4091 Жыл бұрын
@@GreatPolishWingedHussars My man, that's a lot of words...
@GreatPolishWingedHussars Жыл бұрын
@@salvadorhenriquez4091 If you read this you will know a lot more about Poland's history!
@Kubiik6782 жыл бұрын
Kiedy jesteś krzyżakiem i pokonałeś armię mieszka i 😁😁😁😁 ale nagle drzewa zaczynają śpiewać Bogu rodzica 😰😨😰😨😰😨😰
@vonvndoren99912 жыл бұрын
Kiedy nigdy nie miałeś w ręku podręcznika od historii i piszesz komentarz na tematy ci nieznane:
@PlazmaLin_512 жыл бұрын
8:15 Thanos ... That is, the Russian Empire: * snaps his fingers *
@STR5442 жыл бұрын
Please can you send me song in republic era?(link)
@QarolMapping2 жыл бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jMePqLqFprLDhH0.html
@STR5442 жыл бұрын
@@QarolMappingthx you
@teagoodstuff7342 жыл бұрын
First song name pls?
@QarolMapping2 жыл бұрын
Bogurodzica
@patranak322 жыл бұрын
Name of the song during the elective monarchy era?
@QarolMapping2 жыл бұрын
"Boże, coś Polskę"
@crinoxum65492 жыл бұрын
can u do one for bosnia pls
@zepter002 жыл бұрын
It would be 10 seconds material 😆
@Shenalan888 Жыл бұрын
5:06 greatest extent
@ErvinSev2 жыл бұрын
Что за песни там проигрывались? Кто-нибудь даст названия?
@MM-lq4xf2 жыл бұрын
Bogurodzica Hej sokoły Boże coś Polskę Wyklęci Niezłomni
@Defragmentyka0042 жыл бұрын
Wyklęci. Czyli jak wykorzystywać prawdziwych bohaterów i wrzucać ich do jednego wora z pospolitymi bandziorami...
@ESCLance_Wilson2 жыл бұрын
wtedy przynajmniej (6:13) mieliśmy Mińsk Kijów itp. xd
@barbarossa10572 жыл бұрын
Dziś mamay Wrocław i Szczecin.
@vonvndoren99912 жыл бұрын
@@barbarossa1057 Niewiele z tego wynika
@augustpiastowski92982 жыл бұрын
It was a great days back then
@shamilfsobhanstandwithukra3937 Жыл бұрын
what is the song at 9:10
@KeyUploads219 күн бұрын
2:15 bros tthink it's 800 years later
@shamilfsobhanstandwithukra39377 ай бұрын
Are you polish?
@BoogieBMWE347 ай бұрын
Some of kings are described as dukes....
@_kooteecieek69892 жыл бұрын
9:19 co to? Kolonia jakaś?
@ksr77652 жыл бұрын
Gdzie
@_kooteecieek69892 жыл бұрын
@@ksr7765 no, w rogu okienko takie xd
@ksr77652 жыл бұрын
@@_kooteecieek6989 a xd nie zauważyłem
@malopthemapper2 жыл бұрын
Polska strefa okupacji w niemczech
@dry437 ай бұрын
To powinno byc puszczane w kazdej tv polskiej i w szkolach
@wiqu102 ай бұрын
Kanał POGKPP zrobił lepsze, ma lepszą jakość i poprawne granice, a ten film tutaj ma wiele błędów
@97kos2 жыл бұрын
Przemysł II z tego co wiem, był faktycznie królem w latach 1295-1296, natomiast Wacław od 1300 roku 🤔
@szymonjab14657 ай бұрын
9:51 najlepsi przywódcy świata normalnie
@Lu_R2 жыл бұрын
4:38 that moment when king jadwiga
@vonvndoren99912 жыл бұрын
historically she was a king, not a queen
@Lu_R2 жыл бұрын
@@vonvndoren9991 she was both. After meeting Jagiełło she also had another role as a queen while still retaining her status as a king. Therefore there was a time in Polish history where we had two kings married to each other while on of them was a queen at the same time
@robertr15407 ай бұрын
Tylko jak można umieścić Wolinian w okolicach Gdańska a nie Wolina?
@FrancoMapping934 Жыл бұрын
You just added music not a map
@user-ih1qk2nj2j Жыл бұрын
Seriously, Piast ruled for 70 years? how many years did he live
@shamilfsobhanstandwithukra39378 ай бұрын
i have no idea as a Polish myself 😂😂
@sazinom7 ай бұрын
He is only legend, not confirmed to exist
@GaunteroDim7 ай бұрын
82
@walterweiss71247 ай бұрын
there were three piasts after the forefather: Siemowit, Lestek, Siemomysl
@pshepyoortsw7 ай бұрын
🇵🇱🔥
2 жыл бұрын
What is that song? 9:04
@QarolMapping2 жыл бұрын
"Wyklęci Niezłomni"
2 жыл бұрын
@@QarolMapping thanks :)
@user-wo9op8fe8v6 ай бұрын
Не освещён вопрос, польского трона, переделанного в стульчак! 😊
@wiqu102 ай бұрын
🇵🇱♥️🇷🇺🤜🏻🇺🇦
@bruhmmasfk64107 ай бұрын
8:40 what happened to russian poland?
@DevoutCatholic238 ай бұрын
What is the song in the pagan era 0:15
@sazinom7 ай бұрын
Bogurodzica
@Литва1006 ай бұрын
Привет🇵🇱 из 🇷🇺
@thenickerpl2 жыл бұрын
Władysław Jagiełło był królem od 1399 roku...
@DOLIDAR2 жыл бұрын
Nic podobnego. 8-go lutego 1386 poślubił Jadwigę, zaś 15-go marca koronował się na króla Polski. W 1399 został wdowcem po Jadwidze.
@Defragmentyka0042 жыл бұрын
"Bury" rzucał los na stos paląc całe wsie, między innymi niemowlęta i kobiety w ciąży żywcem.
@olek5903 Жыл бұрын
Baza
@magosiapawlak72602 жыл бұрын
A gdzie są mapy setki lat do tyłu,pytam się.
@walterweiss71247 ай бұрын
MAGNA SARMATIA :)
@tomek18672 жыл бұрын
It was not Poland but a Commonwealth of many nations (about 20). There was no nationality but nobility. The country was ran like the European Union. The voice had only nobility. The true name was not Poland but : "the Commonwealth of Poland and Lithuania".
@Jan-kowal2 жыл бұрын
Teoretycznie masz rację, ale takie przedstawienie znacznie ułatwia sprawę. Popatrz jak przedstawiane jest cesarstwo niemieckie, też jako całość a nie jako kilkadziesiąt księstw. Król polski był przecież jednocześnie wielkim księciem litewskim, a tytuł króla jest wyżej niż księcia, więc takie uproszczenie ma sens.
@GreatPolishWingedHussars Жыл бұрын
Your claims are nonsense and contradicts historical reality. As if these were equal nations. That was a Polish empire and these nations had to submit. By the way, the video is actually pretty good! Lithuania is shown as part of the Polish Empire since the 1385 treaty of Krewo, as are other territories. Because of the personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385, Poland became an empire and Lithuania, like other territories, was part of the Polish Empire. The treaty of Krewo for personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385 was the first step in Poland's takeover of Lithuania. This union was declared indissoluble. This personal union meant that the Polish king should also be the ruler of Lithuania. In fact, the union treaty also contained the provision of the attaching of Lithuanian and Ruthenian lands to the Polish Crown. However, the various other treaties which followed this treaty actually meant the takeover and Polonization of Lithuania too. A significant resolution was the adoption of Polish administrative divisions and offices like voivode and castellan by Lithuania. Even more important was that in total 47 selected Lithuanian nobles were adopted by Polish nobles heraldic families and granted Polish coats of arm. This symbolic gesture signified their desire to adopt Polish customs and integrate into Polish society. Because of this possibility of heraldic adoption, Poland had a much higher proportion of nobles than other European kingdoms. In Poland, the proportion of nobles in the total population was already 10-15% in the 16th century, in the rest of Europe it was 1%. Thus the Union of Krewo in 1385 signified the beginnings of the strengthened Polonization of Lithuania. Strengthened Polonization because the Polonization actually started before the Union of Krewo, because Lithuania was Christianized from Poland. Priests, especially from Poland, Christianized Lithuania and priests had great influence at that time, so there was already a Polish Influence in Lithuania before the Union of Krewo. So the Polonization of Lithuania started with the Christianization and was finally completed with the Union of Lublin. What was also good was that it was shown that the Polish king also ruled Sweden with Finland for a short time. Unfortunately, because of his inability, he lost control of Sweden and Finland again BUT...what is bad is that the video does not show that the Polish Empire ruled Russia in 1610. Unfortunately, the same king Sigismund III Vasa lost rule over Russia because of the same incompetence as he previously lost rule over Sweden and Finland. What is also negative is that the historically wrong term "Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth" is used, although at least Lithuania is shown as part of the Polish Empire, although the wrong term is used to name the state. Unfortunately, many people and historians use the wrong term commonwealth in connection with Polish history. You too! But the term Commonwealth is inappropriate because it gives the impression that the state was a common wealth for Poles and Lithuanians alike. So the common wealth served both nations equally. But in reality the Lithuanians had to submit to the Poles and were largely Polonized and thus assimilated. It was actually a Polish empire completely dominated by the Poles. Lithuania was completely dominated by the Polish Empire like also the Ruthenians who were the ancestors of the Belarusians and Ukrainians. Poles completely dominated them all. The Lithuanians were voluntarily polonized and the Ruthenians partly too. All relevant was Polish like also the Polish currency Polski Złoty. Złoty means golden in Polish. The capitals of the entire state were the Polish cities of Krakow and Warsaw. The ruling Poles have also determined what the state should be called Polisch Rzeczpospolita! The Polish name was then adopted by the Lithuanians into the Lithuanian languages as "Žečpospolita". By the way, Polish term for nobility ”szlachta” was also adopted into Lithuanian as ”šlėkta” like many other Polish words. The majority of the loanwords in Lithuanian were from Polish. Polish dominance about the Lithuanians, so also about the Ruthenians illustrates also that the Polish king automatically became the grand duke of Lithuania. That was by far not the only additional title of the Polish kings. For example, the Polish King Sigismund III Vasa had in addition to the Polish royal title, Grand Duke of Lithuania and Grand Duke of Finland, Prince of Rus, Prussia, Mazovia, Volhynia, Podolia, Podlaskie, Severia, Czernihów, Samogitia, Livonia, also Hereditary King of Sweden. Rus stands for Russia because the Poles ruled large areas of Russia at the time, and even Moscow was briefly occupied by Polish troops. Samogitia stands for the Baltic States, which the Polish king largely ruled. Hereditary king of Sweden and Grand Duke of Finland because the Polish king was also the king of Sweden for a short time. But he lost the power in Sweden and Finland. This list of titles makes it clear that Grand Duke of Lithuania was just one of the many titles of the Polish king. But the most important title was always King of Poland. In the end, the title Grand Duke of Lithuania was just one of many Polish king's titles. The title was particularly important only at the beginning of the Polish rule over Lithuania, when the Lithuanian nobility was not yet Polonized. At that time the Poles still had to pretend the Lithuanian nobility that this was not a takeover. The treaty of Krewo for personal union of Poland with Lithuania in 1385 was the first step in Poland's takeover of Lithuania. This union was declared indissoluble. This personal union meant that the Polish king should also be the ruler of Lithuania. In fact, the union treaty also contained the provision of the attaching of Lithuanian and Ruthenian lands to the Polish Crown. However, the various other treaties which followed this treaty actually meant the takeover and Polonization of Lithuania too. A significant resolution was that in total 47 selected Lithuanian nobles were adopted by Polish nobles heraldic families and granted Polish coats of arm. This symbolic gesture signified their desire to adopt Polish customs and integrate into Polish society. This was part of Poland's significantly increased Polonization of Lithuania. Thus the Union of Krewo in 1385 signified the beginnings of the strengthened Polonization of Lithuania. Strengthened Polonization because the Polonization actually started before the Union of Krewo, because Lithuania was Christianized from Poland. Priests, especially from Poland, Christianized Lithuania and priests had great influence at that time, so there was already a Polish Influence in Lithuania before the Union of Krewo. So the Polonization of Lithuania started with the Christianization and was finally completed with the Union of Lublin. Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is absolutely wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire which was completely dominated by the Poles and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. In any case, it would make sense to use the Polish proper name Rzeczpospolita as a designation for this state, which was actually still internationally common in the 19th century when talking about Poland before the partitions. The term Rzeczpospolita seems difficult to pronounce for non-Poles. But that is not the case at all. With a little practice, anyone can pronounce the term correctly, even you. A little help: Rz is pronounced like the "isi" in vision. So virzon sounds like vision. Cz sounds like the "ch" in church. So Czurcz sounds like church. But if one just use "sh" instead of "rz", that sounds close to Polish. "Ch" can be used instead of "cz". So Shechpospolita would be written in English, which could be pronounced without problems. So there is no reason not to use this correct term.
@mdwrob4 ай бұрын
Modern historians universally reject this fiction.
@gysar7758 ай бұрын
А где ВКЛ
@lottythekidd-22 жыл бұрын
Ej, ale wiesz, że Piast nie żył 190 lat? Wg kroniki, żył 120 lat.
@DiamondCounter94336 ай бұрын
What is the song at the republic era?
@squeeze28452 жыл бұрын
Обожнюю Польщу)
@leszekz5927 ай бұрын
Wtf? Why doesn't modern Poland have Spisz and Orawa on your map??
@yipengguo27322 жыл бұрын
Used to be a great power in Eastern Europe, now a protective state under America...
@papi53772 жыл бұрын
W ciągu dalszym pod ZSSR - Prusy Pod kolhoz. Czas na, zmiany już wkrótce!
@TooHarD122 жыл бұрын
What?
@jerzyblinowski51772 жыл бұрын
At present, it is better to be a protector of the United States than under Chinese occupation like the Uighurs or the Tibetans. Ask the people of Taiwan what they prefer.
@Lord69872 жыл бұрын
Does polish culture have a german influence on it?
@maciejrzepczyk65628 ай бұрын
No the vast majority of Poland does not. But areas around Gdansk (Danzig), Upper and Lower Silesias sort of do. The architecture is mainly German, and the culture has mere influences. But generally those areas have a culture of their own not to be seen anywhere else. Both Silesias have their own flags, food, folk clothes and dialects.
@shamilfsobhanstandwithukra3937 Жыл бұрын
Messner died two days before I was born.
@walterweiss71247 ай бұрын
who?
@Halestem2 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure but is Poland the only country to be both a great power and an annexed and subjugated country?
@merlinxpyt7 ай бұрын
For example Grece: great power during Alexander and Byzantine times and then completely annexed by Turkey.
@walterweiss71247 ай бұрын
great power maybe between 1410-1610, then between 1648 and 1717 total downfall: too many enemies
@gyrostat52112 жыл бұрын
what are the songs?
@ElBiałogard2 жыл бұрын
Bogurodzica Hej sokoły Boże, coś Polskę Wyklęci, Niezłomni
@mariusztrzaskoma35062 жыл бұрын
Może trzeba wrócić do czasów Królów Polskich by Polską znów rządzili królowie. Wtedy to polska dopiero urośnie w siłę i będzie coś znaczyła w Europie i na świecie.
@Kapitalistyczna_Polska2 жыл бұрын
Wystarczy nie mieć w rządzie Idiotów. (Nie mówię tylko o PiS)
@vonvndoren99912 жыл бұрын
Przestań czytać baśnie
@mariusztrzaskoma35062 жыл бұрын
@@vonvndoren9991 a ty pisać głupoty. Bo nikt nie chce ich czytać 🤬🤬🤬🤬
@opalek467 Жыл бұрын
co
@NecrosDeus7 ай бұрын
@@mariusztrzaskoma3506 A jak ten król miałby być wybrany? Jakaś wolna elekcja? Jakieś wybory? Jak na razie, jedynymi prawnymi pretendentami do korony polskiej są potomkowie ostatniego cara Rosji. To ci pasuje?
@labaslietuva88242 жыл бұрын
The common history of Lithuania and Poland is not only the history of Poland.Because the history of Poland, dominated by Lithuania, can be presented in the same way.Just as Poland could not grow without Lithuania, so Lithuania could not strengthen. But history has shown that the union was not strong.
@Wiktorino19842 жыл бұрын
Not by modern Lithuania, that Lithuanians from old times where Rusthenians modern Balerussians, Poland go grow even faster with Hungary we could chose.
@labaslietuva88242 жыл бұрын
@@Wiktorino1984 learn history better
@Wiktorino19842 жыл бұрын
@@labaslietuva8824 No mate, Lithuania have to ally with Poland becose Russian Tzardom and Teutonic Order wanted annihiliate them. Still You got same problem you are betwen Kalliningrad and Balerus.
@labaslietuva88242 жыл бұрын
Or annihiliate Poland:) change mind
@Wiktorino19842 жыл бұрын
@@labaslietuva8824 Nice toxic only have you got.
@drago2622 жыл бұрын
Strasznie smutne jest, gdy patrzysz na portrety wszystkich tych wspaniałych monarchów, którzy prowadzili ten kraj do wielkości, a potem widzisz portrety Dudy i Morawieckiego.
@wojciechbieszk10742 жыл бұрын
O tyle dobrze że już nie trzeba patrzeć na tuska kopacz czy hansa franka
@opalek467 Жыл бұрын
co
@marcinerdmann4767 ай бұрын
No to teraz się napatrz na niemiecko-ruskiego agenta pod tytułem Tusk.
@elzbietakaim97277 ай бұрын
Na szczęście mamy 2024 i już justice and law nie rządzi w Polsce 😀