I love Turkic Languages especially Sakha

Hi, Mr. Dragon Historian, I am 10 1/2 years old and I love your history videos. My name is Kevin and I am Korean-American. Your channel says your name is Sean Kim so I am guessing that you are Korean too like me lol. I just want to say thank you sooooo much for these videos. I have always wanted to know more about my Korean culture and history but most history taught in the USA are about Western countries or the US instead of Korea or nearby countries like China. So, I am very grateful that you make all these videos. I hope that you don't mind me asking but, is this your job? I mean, do you get paid by KZfaq or are you a volunteer? Just curious. Are you a history teacher or plan to become a professor in Asian history? I want to be a writer about different cultures around the world like a travel writer but I am not sure if there are many jobs out there so I will probably go to graduate school after college to get a normal day job in business and just write on the side as a hobby. Anyway, thank you so much for all your videos, Mr. Kim.

Austroasiatic languages next?

Safavids spoke Azerbaijani

Azerbaijani wasn't even official language in Iran. Despite the kings being Azeri. the people just speak their languages

Those westerners especially americans pretty liberally put stereotypical chinese music in *serious documentaries* about japan or vietnam so i can't expect more really...

That's the first thing caught my attention. I was like, "Hey, that music is Arabic, not Turkic."

because nowadays lots of west "Turkish" people are the descendants of Indo-European. believing Arabic religion. has genetically and culturally nothing to do with Turk except speaking Turkic languages. they are humiliating their ancestors by calling themselves Turks.

Map is wrong

It doesn't sound like arabic music though

*Until Khazars migrated to Europe.

Russia ate the Turks there

@@mayda2898 but now rUsSia can ate little UKRAINE and were soon TURKS will ate all of estarn europe the middle east and north africa 🖕

Then became Ukrainian ​@@mayda2898

Not only speakers they are Turkic and Qajars too. Safavids are Qizilbash Turks and descentands of Akkoyunlu state. Afsharids are from the Afshar tribe of the Oghuz Turks. Qajars are from the Bayat tribe of the Oghuz Turks.

Afsharlar Turkmen,Safavilar Azerbaijani

Afsharid✌🏻

Mughals are Öz Bekliyorum (Oghuz Beg)

@@suleimanthemagnificent1494 Safavids were Kurds, learn basic history 👇 en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safavid_dynasty

Doğru değil.Altinadamdaki ön turkce hatta baya tirkce yazı 2500 yaşında

@@avukatrecep8016 Evet geç başlatmış baya

@@suleimanthemagnificent1494 oyş

@@papazataklaattiranimam 🐰

Geç başlatmamış daha öncesi bilinmiyor, ama videoda hatalar var, kuzey suriye ve ırak çizgi çizgi olmalı ve ayrıca mısır sadece çizgi değil mısırda kıpçak göçü var.

Salom from Uzbekistan

We're are the CRIMEAN TATARS ?(

Cyprus is Greek. Adygeiya is Northwestern Caucasian. Buryatia and Kalmykia are Mongloic. Chechnya is North Caucasian. Yamalo-Nenets and Udmurt are Uralic

​@@hilmust6278 Dagestan is persian

@@Uran_KH-98 half of Dagestan is Persian, and the other half is Turkic

Turkey değil Türkiye

The nomadic extremists of nomads lol

mongols: Amateurs

@@unanec Mongols were nomads too. And they conquered so much but they didn't live where they conquered.

@@alkarisi2585 that's what i meant

you should go back to turkmenistan and uyghuristan , reclaim your homeland

Anatolia Turks just turkified greeks

@@jxelus1274 Sinicized Manchurian?You

Thank you! I'm personally not sure about the Oghur history shown in this video myself. This version would only be valid if the Xiongnu were really Oghur speakers, which has yet to be proven.

@@TheDragonHistorian Prof. Dr. Nicola Di Cosmo in: The Turks: Early ages, Part 4. Huns (Xiongnu): The Origin and Rise of the Xiongnu Empire, Y. T., 2002, pp.217-227, University of Michigan, ISBN 9756782552, 9789756782552 "There is not much doubt among historians about the Turkish nature of the Great Hun Empire, which ruled between 318 B.C. and 216 A.D., as well as that of its predecessor proto-Huns, whose presence was confirmed by Chinese sources. The Great Hun Empire, the Western Hun Empire and especially the European Huns were examined comprehensively by Western historians."

@@papazataklaattiranimam lets wait for more proofs man

English-Black - Japanese-Kuroi, Korean-Komon, Mongolian-Khar, Turkish-Kara

Mongolia is not Turk

@@cultureofturk711 Baekje Kumu Goguryeo Kumur

@@russiaandsouthkoreafriends8253 Mongolia is Altaic. you are again read my post. i not said Mongolians Turks.

@@cultureofturk711 and Komon (x) Kumun.Kuun.Kumon.Kaman (o)

You're Siberian?

@@danielpavialivori7832 yes

@@SaydamNomad so cool

Do u speak Dolgan i can Speak Turkish Azeri and a bit Turkmen and Kazakh

У Саха есть монгольские корни от Хори

The music sounds very middle eastern. It could be something like “Toquz Oyuz” instead

The hatch marks mean the speakers are socially lower than the rulers regardless of the number of speakers. If Eastern Thrace has Turkish speaking RULERS, then you're right. However, if they're, no matter how they are dominant in number, socially more for commoners, then hatch marks are proper.

@@Neky_Hina Every mayors and governors are speaking Turkish.

are guys muslim or christians?

@@muslimproudtobe 97% of Turks are Muslim (Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Uzbek, Tatar, Turkmen, Azerbaijani, Uyghur, Turkish, Karachay, Nogay, Qumuq)

@@nevsehri4819 sen cidden oranın o kadar büyük olduğuna inanıyor musun?

Nazara nazar kaç yazar 🈴

Greetings from Oghuz Ottoman Turks.

These letters are nice👍

@@vehbisabanc7843 ne dedin orda reis

Oghuz Turks🇹🇷🇦🇿🇹🇲❤️Kıpchak Turks🇰🇿❤️Kırygız Turks🇰🇬❤️Timurid Turks🇺🇿❤️Hun Turks🇭🇺❤️Brother🇵🇰

@@seljuksempire7712 Turcia İmperium

Yes Sala Zu is very close to Azerbaycanı Turkish and Türkmen oghuz language

olum beni takip ediyosun :D ben sana tanışalım dedim.

Argu turk lenguage(xalaç khalaj halaç kholaç kholg galaç khalaj center iran h ) all= hall* ev=hev* yollar=yollrga* olsan=olta* guz=kozing yox yok=yug yohg agaç=hagaç ay=hay doşan=toşgan gurt=bury siçan=siçgan guzlerin=kozlering barmag= varmag dil= til dirnag= tirnag yaxçi=havola Sari=çakir akir ag= horon ayak ayag=hadag su=sov istiyourum= eyorom okuco oxucu=oxogoy. baş=başing basga olmaz =olmas

İn Turkey,We are %80 understand.

As a Turkish, I can understand nearly all of them Oghuz languages (Turkmen, Azerbeijan, Gagauz etc.) and I can understand a most part of other Turkic langugages.

Thanks guys, it could be great! As a hungarian, we cannot understand one foreign language... Neither our language family (Finnish, Estonian).

Oghuz can understand oghuz clearly (turkish, azeri, gagauz, crimean, turkmen, salar)

İt depends on witch type of turkic language you speaking. Of course all the turkic languages tons of same words but there is some differents for example I'm Kipchak language speaker my mother Tongue is Karachay-Balkar language when I talk to a Kazakh, nogai or Kyrgyz they able to understand me clearly. They even understand the jokes I made and laugh to death. But when I say something to Oghuz type of sprakers they hardly understand what I'm saying maybe %40 of my words. mostly because the prenonce and the words proper meaning but I can tell all the turkic speakers can communicate eachother

Bro, please speak English 😂 this is so hard 😂

@@yusufaliakyuva2036 It's just a translation of what Dragon historian missed. Dragon historian had written the same already in English.

Southern Syria and Iraq are in a complete minority . During the Qajar period, only a small part of the palace was spoken in Azerbaijani Turkish . Not the people ... So was Egypt

세 번째로 맘루크를 말씀하시는 것 같은데요

@@marqidosad7657 맘루크 왕조의 지배층이 킵차크족 노예출신이라서 그렇습니다.

*invasion of caucasus by russia Stop being biased

@@youknow8653 What do you mean? what prejudice? Everything I wrote is science, not bias

@@fq8302 when its an eastern nation, its "invasion" When its an european nation, its "conquest"

@@youknow8653 These are synonyms and this is history. I myself am an Azerbaijani, and in matters of the history of my country, I do not suffer from bias

@@fq8302 But "invasion" is often used to describe an enemy nations "conquest" While "conquest" is used to describe a friendly nations "invasion" The "friend" at this point is the europe (and america). And its eurocentric

According to who most historians say they were Proto-Mongolic?

not turkish, you must say TURKIC!

Yes! Ogur lanuages not turkish.. .. Ogur family: 1. Hunnic. 2. Avar 3. Khazar 4. Hefthalita 5. Sabir 6. Hunogur 7. Hungarian (Magyar).

Türkiye winner?

@@Tower_Swagman no no no

@@chepnitatar28 Turkish is a family. We are speaking İstanbul Turkish.

Yes, Mongolian throat singing is better :)

@@Arabian010 yes , because some turks also does it

Kusura bakma da ingilizcen içler acısı

@@DatBowlingGuy maalesef :(

@@trserhat33 Aga senin için bunu geliştirmeni dileyerek cümleni düzeltecem. *For the first time, l see a non-turk channel owner that shows Turks so well. (Good demedim yoksa uyumsuz duruyordu)

But they dont spoke turkic.

Tuoba is a tribe of Xianbei, which has deeper relationships with Khitan and later Mongols, similar to the relationship between the Goths, Franks, and later Germans. The conquest of northern China by the Xianbei people ended with their sinicization. However, we do not know whether the ancient vocabulary of Xianbei was referred to as a larger ethnic group such as named Germanic or a tribe name as Goth. Therefore, modern linguists have included both Xianbei and Khitan languages in the Mongolic languages family, instead of including Khitan and Mongolian in the Xianbei language family. In fact, in the later stage of the Xianbei people's control over northern China, Tuoba no longer had the leadership of the Xianbei people, North China has split into two parts, The east: a Xianbei oriented Chinese who leaders most Xianbei army . The west: a Xianbei King of Yuwen tribe who leads more Chinese and less Xianbei army.

6000😉

@@turan2815 atma!

0. Because the video is not true.

It’s completely fake. Waste of time.

​@@Raidon8537There was small mistakes, but overall its good.

​@@byambajavr6519where is the fake part?

Interesting point

Do you like Tatars ? I am Tatar

KZ

@@myosotis1306 ne angime😏

music cant be turkic, there are many nations/tribes that speak turkic, with own different folk music

And Jalair (Yaglakar), Bayad, Barga, Kurykan, Bayirku…

@@papazataklaattiranimamcelayir ve bayad moğoldur

@@Timurid1370 evet ama Moğollaşmış Türkler

Scythians were iranic. Sorry to break your illusion.

@@xanshen9011 this theory got debunked Arzhan-2, the archaeological site of world significance, a national treasure of peoples of Tuva and Russia, located in the «Valley of Kings» (Piy-Khemsk District, Tyva Republic), was investigated in 2001-2004 by the Central Asian Archaeological Expedition of the State Hermitage Museum headed by K.V. Chugunov. The sites has been dated to the 7th c. BC and attributed to the Scythian-Siberian cultural community. When exploring the «royal» burial of the early Scythian site of Arzhan-2, the scientists faced the questions of the origin of the buried, periodization and chronology of the monument, its archaeological-cultural attribution, the autochthonous nature of the population that left it, and its relationship with other Eurasian early nomadic cultures. The present study is addressing the most important issue of the appearance of the buried people and characteristics of their anthropological type. The material for the study was comprised of male and female skulls from burial 5 of Arzhan-2 mound. The article describes in detail the process of reconstruction of the physical appearance of the deceased and provides examples of calculating ante mortem parameters based on craniometric measurements. The complex stages of preliminary work related to the restoration of skulls and manufacturing of their exact copies are highlighted. The results of the physical appearance reconstruction are presented in the form of visual museum objects - sculptural portraits. The scientific reconstruction of the ante mortem appearance on skulls of the «king» and «queen» was carried out in the Laboratory of Anthropological Reconstruction of the Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology of the Russian Academy of Sciences by anthropologists Drs E.V. Veselovskaya and R.M. Galeev. In anthropological terms, the buried show a peculiar mosaic of Caucasoid and Mongoloid features. They are characterized by brachycephaly and dome-shaped head, with notably developed rugosity of the supercilium in the man and its absence in the woman. For the man, an average width of the face and a narrow forehead of medium height are noted. The woman has broad face and forehead, the height of the forehead is average. Both portraits are characterized by prominent position of eyeballs and large eyes. Man’s nose is short, prominent, with convex dorsum. Woman’s nose has a wavy dorsum, and is slightly prominent. On the male portrait, the cheekbones are moderate, on the female one - high and prominent. Faces of the «royal» persons are flattened in the upper part, with a certain degree of alveolar prognathism. The lower jaw of the man is medium in size, narrow in the corners. For the woman, some gracility of the lower jaw can be noted. Veselovskaya, E.V. & Galeev, Ravil. (2020). Anthropological reconstruction of the physical appearance of the «king» and «queen» from the early Scythian burial and memorial complex of Arzhan-2. VESTNIK ARHEOLOGII, ANTROPOLOGII I ETNOGRAFII. 112-122. 10.20874/2071-0437-2020-49-2-10. Early physical analyses have unanimously concluded that the Saka, even those far to the east (e.g. the Pazyryk region), possessed predominantly "Europid" features, although mixed 'Euro-mongoloid" phenotypes also occur, depending on site and period. Сергей Иванович Руденко (Sergei I. Rudenko) (1970). Frozen Tombs of Siberia: The Pazyryk Burials of Iron Age Horsemen. University of California Press. pp. 45-46. ISBN 978-0-520-01395-7. Archived from the original on 2017-03-27. Retrieved 2016-09-25. The Scythians feature in the treatise as an evocative umbrella for Russia’s Turkic neighbours, one of the Asiatic hordes against which the now self-avowedly Western empire struggled to carry out its civilizing mission. Meyer, C. (2020). From Scythian Ethnography to Aryan Christianity: Herodotean Revolutions on the Eve of the Russian Revolution. In T. Harrison & J. Skinner (Eds.), Herodotus in the Long Nineteenth Century (pp. 200-223). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108562805.009 Another study by the same team, again of mtDNA from two Scytho-Siberian skeletons found in the Altai Republic, showed that they had been typical males "of mixed Euro-Mongoloid origin". One of the individuals was found to carry the F2a maternal lineage, and the other the D lineage, both of which are characteristic of East Eurasian populations.

@@Nomadicenjoyer31 The term “scythian” was a catch all umbrella term the greeks used for steppe nomads. While the scythians themselves were many different tribes and nations the scythian culture as a whole was iranic. Maybe SOME eastern scythians had some admixture with turkic tribes in south siberia, as evidenced by skeletal remains found in the area harboring both mongoloid and caucasoid traits, this DOES NOT MEAN that the scythians as a whole were turks!

@@xanshen9011 saka iran indo orupa. I lam race iran aria saka

@@Nomadicenjoyer31 saka language iran aira l lam race aria saka sakestan iran. kafaza alan osetia iron saka aira sun= xor xor khor hedd= sar shar. Iran aria mad pars part(saka) iraon saka sarmetia kafkaz. Saka Siberia çin centet asia iran kafkaz orupa. My languge is close to saka.iran anitigueites(pasargad takht jamshid 2500 BC tehre saka( saka hom nosh,saka paraderya,saka tiz khod kings name sekonkha,saka suoth west chin mongula south sibira) ( heroic iranian shahname hero rostem sakzi saksi balasakan sakanshah sakiz iranina people & indo orupa.

Mongolian is a different language and it has its own dialects, Both Mongolian and Turkic are in Altaic language family. Such as Both Hebrew and Arabic are in Semitic language family but they are different languages, Here is example of same sentence (i used Turkish latin alphabet for all) Mongolian = çi keniig alsan be? Uzbek= Kimni ōldirding Turkish =Kimi öldürdün? Türkmenistan= kimi öldürding? Uyghur= Kimni öltürding? Azerbayjan= kimi öldürdün? Kazakh= kimdi öltirding? Kyrgyz=kimdi öltürdüng?

@@PimsleurTurkishLessons Right so there are a ton language contact and cultural blending between Mongols and Turks over thousands of years, no doubt about that. My question was, there was also a ton of contact between various Turkic and Chinese states. The were always trade, war, politics between SIno-Tibetan speaking people and Turkic people(especially in the very strategic Hexi Corridor area) over thousands of years as well and Turkic groups even created some minor dynasties in various periods in Chinese history. Why are there no linguistic connections(loan words and grammar influence) between the two. The only one can recognize might be related is the world "Tengri" and "Tian"(Old chinese "ten") which is the world for heaven.

@@dsong2006 there is no any connection between Tengri = God and Tian=ten :D. if you call this as connection then i can say top=ball in Turkish but it means different in English so is top a Turkish orginal word in English? Mongolian and Turkish are in same language family "Altaic" which is aggulunative so here are lots of suffixes so lots of syllables. But chinese is in one syllable language family no suffixes. Also geneticly mongolian and chinese are not even close.

@@PimsleurTurkishLessons I'm not saying Turks are related to Chinese, not at all. What I am saying is languages develop loanwords through contact. And there are over 1000 year of contact between Chinese and Xiongnu/Xianbei/Rouran/Old Uyghurs and other Turkic people. Language contact is the reason why Korean has significant chinese vocabulary in the nouns. Or why Thai(Kra-Dai) and Vietnamese(Austro-Asiatic) for ex. uses Chinese numbers. Those languages are not related to Chinese but has shared words with Chinese through contact.

@@dsong2006 1. Turkic. altyn ~ altun 'gold' altun 'gold' (Räsänen, 1969, 18, 488). 2. Turk. baqšy ~ baqsy 'storyteller'

Huns are not turks they we're speaking a Alanno-Germano-Hunnic languages based on Xiongnu and local languages which doesn't have anything to do with turkic

@@Skikdii 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓

​@@Skikdii no the HUNS spock a OLD TURKIC LANGUAGE and not GEY german or Alan language

Most of Mongols living under the China 😹😹😹

Except it does. Central asia were primarily iranic and tocharian speaking people before the turkic migration after collapse of xiongnu.

@@xanshen9011 Northern Central Asia was always turkish like part of kazakhstan

@@xanshen9011 iranic and tocharic speakers lived in southern central asia

Prof. Dr. Nicola Di Cosmo in: The Turks: Early ages, Part 4. Huns (Xiongnu): The Origin and Rise of the Xiongnu Empire, Y. T., 2002, pp.217-227, University of Michigan, ISBN 9756782552, 9789756782552 "There is not much doubt among historians about the Turkish nature of the Great Hun Empire, which ruled between 318 B.C. and 216 A.D., as well as that of its predecessor proto-Huns, whose presence was confirmed by Chinese sources. The Great Hun Empire, the Western Hun Empire and especially the European Huns were examined comprehensively by Western historians." The term Turkic represents a broad ethno-linguistic group of peoples including existing societies such as Altai, Azerbaijanis, Balkars, Bashkirs, Chuvashes, Crimean Karaites, Gagauz, Karachays, Karakalpaks, Kazakhs, Khakas, Krymchaks, Kyrgyz people, Nogais, Qashqai, Tatars, Turkmens, Turkish people, Tuvans, Uyghurs, Uzbeks, and Yakuts and as well as ancient and medieval states such as Dingling, Bulgars, Alat, Basmyl, Onogurs, Shatuo, Chuban, Göktürks, Oghuz Turks, Kankalis, Khazars, Khiljis, Kipchaks, Kumans, Karluks, Bahri Mamluks, Ottoman Turks, Seljuk Turks, Tiele, Timurids, Turgeshes, Yenisei Kirghiz, and Huns, Tuoba, and Xiongnu.[24][25][26][27][28] The predecessors of Huihe were Xiongnu. Because, customarily, they ride high-wheeled carts. They were also called Gaoche during the Yuan Wei times, or also called Chile, mistakenly rendered as Tiele. - Xin Tangshu, 232 only the Turkic Gaoju origin of the Hephthalites should be retained as indicative of their primary ethnicity.[82] Weishu, vol. 103 txt: "高車，[...] 其語略與匈奴同而時有小異，或云其先匈奴之甥也", tr: "The Gaoju, [...] their language and the Xiongnu's are similar though differ a little; or to say it differently, they are the sororal nephews/sons-in-laws of the Xiongnu " According to the Book of Wei, the Yuebans' language and customs were the same as the Gaoche, who were Turkic speakers. Yuebans(Weak Xiongnu) cut their hair and trimmed their ghee-smeared, sun-dried, glossy eyebrows evenly, and washed before meals three times everyday.[18][19] Chinese sources link the Tiele people and Ashina to the Xiongnu, According to the Book of Zhou and the History of the Northern Dynasties, the Ashina clan was a component of the Xiongnu confederation.[84][85] Uyghur Khagans claimed descent from the Xiongnu (according to Chinese history Weishu, the founder of the Uyghur Khaganate was descended from a Xiongnu ruler).[86] Both the 7th-century Chinese History of the Northern Dynasties[87] and the Book of Zhou,[88] an inscription in the Sogdian language, report the Göktürks to be a subgroup of the Xiongnu.[89][90] Tiele are originally Xiongnu's splinter stocks. As Tujue are strong and prosperous, all Tiele districts (郡) are divided and scattered, the masses gradually dwindled and weakened. Until the beginning of Wude [era], there have been Xueyantuo, Qibi, Huihe, Dubo, Guligan, Duolange, Pugu, Bayegu, Tongluo, Hun, Sijie, Huxue, Xijie, Adie, Baixi, etc. scattered in the northern wastelands. - Jiu Tangshu, 199, lower

Bro do a video on languages

Bunu yazıb nə əldə etməyə çalışırsan ?

Proto turks were haplogroup c?

@@xanshen9011 lol and u have a better theory?

@@pokkachu9252 Im just asking for a source, no need to get defensive for no reason.

Based on the archaeological evidence and genetic tests done on the remains of the Liao civilisation which is at the heart of the Transeurasian hypothesis, 4 out of 6 of the male remains at the Hongshan culture Niuheliang archaeological site and all 13 remains from the Xiaoheyan archaeological site belongs to Haplogroup N-M231. Haplogroup N-M231 is found at more than 90% frequency among the Sakha (Yakuts) and also very common among other Siberian Turkic peoples (Tuvans, Khakass, Dolgans etc.); all Turkic peoples do have a certain frequency of N-M231 including the Volga Tatars, Chuvash, Bashkirs and some early branches have been identifiable with a very early Proto-Turkic split of Sakha (Yakut), Chuvash (Volga Bulgar) and Bulgars. There have been some branches of N1a2b-P43 which have been found to be quite common in Turkey and Azerbaijan too. Furthermore some early Avar samples including the Avar khagan himself found at Kunbabony, Hungary has also been found to belong to Haplogroup N1a1-TAT.

Japanese don't carry Haplogroup C, while Koreans carry around 20% of it. Interestingly, the Hazara people from Afghanistan show admixture because they are direct descendants from the Mongol Army.

Курды ираноязычны.

I thought I was the only one who noticed that, he also put chagatai Turkic being spoken as far south as Rajasthan (India). This wouldn’t be accurate as the language was only spoken in northern Afghanistan and the transoxiana/ Tarim basin.

@@ProfessorOFanthropology979 I'm pretty sure Chaghatay was spoken by some in that area during the early Mughal period.

@@ZanuDA9711 if it was spoken in India then it would be spoken today, the Mughals spoke Persian or hindi and they stopped speaking chagatai once they had left transoxiana and came to the outskirts of Kabul.

Check out Nativlang video on the subject, it greatly explains why the Altaic language family is nowadays considered as invalid.

@@PimsleurTurkishLessons The problem is that there is right now no proof for the altaic family, the main explanation for the ressemblances being due to sprachbund effects and borrowings according to most modern historical linguists

@@thibistharkuk2929 Although the altai language family is still being discussed, we can Turks them as a single part, since Uzbek, Anatolian Turks, Kazakh, Azerbaijani, Turkmen, Saka, Nogay and Tatars are Turks, you can think of them as different branches of Turkish. like a tree. As a result, they are all in Turkish. Turkic language family

@Nadir Hikmet Kuleli so this shows that Turkish is a unique language.

@@tatartachanka7468 I know that turkic is a valid language family. Altaic however is not.

agean coast spoke turkish too this is not entirely correct

Timurid, gaznevid, baburid empires...

Turkic people are NOT originated in today Manchuria, mongol are . It is more likely turkic get that type of DNA through intermarrige with mongol

​@@kellyma2992 Mongolian carry Haplogroup C2,Siberian dominant haplogroup N About 50,000 years ago, C2 entered East Asia, and C1 entered Southeast Asia About 40,000 years ago,K2 split into MNOPQRS entered East Asia and Siberia MS remained in Southeast Asia NO remained in East Asia PQR remained in Siberia About 30,000 years ago, QR separated About 20,000 years ago R went to Europe and Q went to America Therefore, Native Americans：Q1 C2 R1 As the climate began warming at around 18,000 years ago, the Beringia region also became more moist and the sea level rose,submerging the land bridge . About 10,000-15,000 years ago, N1O2 entered Mongolia and mixed with C2Q1R1 Among them, those who stayed in East Asia became the Mongolian race（NOQC2MS） Mongolian race= East Asians, Asean（Austronesian，Tai-Kadai..）, Altaic people (Turkic, Mongolic, and Tungusic speaking people), American Indians/Native Americans East Asians and Native Americans are Sinodont They carry the EDAR gene, found in ancient and modern East Asians, Southeast Asians and Native Americans but not common in African or European populations About 5000-10000 years ago Xiongnu/（C2 N1a O2a Q1）+ R1a→Xianbei → Rouran → Turkic Empire →Mongol Empire→ Qing Empire Mongolian=53,8%C2+10,8%O2+10,8%N1+4,6%P* (xQ,R)+9,2%R1a The proto-Altaic people split into two groups N1a and O2a+C2 Most of the Altaic people who remained in the east became Han chinese，Mongolian，Southern Tungusic（Manchu，Xibe），Korean，Janpanese Han chinese=50%O2a+13,0%O1a+ 12,0%C2+ 10,3%N1+ 7,2%O1b + 4,2%Q1 Genetically, Manchu exhibit roughly equal frequencies of the Y-DNA haplogroups N1a（formerly N1c）, O2a and C2 (formerly C3). N1a enter Siberia and became the Neo-Siberians (absorb Paleo-Siberians Q1R1C2) They are divided into Four groups： 1， Siberian Turks：The Khakas，Chukchi people，The Tuvans，Dolgans，The Yakuts，Yukaghir people，Yukaghir people N1a has been found with greatest frequency among indigenous peoples of Siberian Turks 2，North Tungusic（Evenks，Evens，Oroqen），North Mongolians（Buryats，Kalmyks） 3，Uralic people：Samoyedic +Ugric people Enets，Nganasans，Nenets，about 90%N1a Finns + Hungarian people 4，Native American，Inuit，Yeniseian people O2a+C2 enter the Korean peninsula,where they assimilated the earlier inhabitants of the peninsula(O1b). Korean=41%O2+31%O1b2+15%C2+4%N1a+3%O1a+2%O1b1+2%QR.. During the Yayoi period, haplogroup O1b2+O2a started to arrive and spreaded to every region of Japan. Origin of Japanese: Jomon (D1a2+C1a1) + Korean peninsula /Yayoi (O2a+O1b2). 3，Historians believe that the Huns were not a single ethnicity but a confederation-like grouping of Siberian natives（N1a Q1 C2） and Indo-European tribes（R1aR1b，Old European（I ））. N1a+QR1a：Khanty and Mansi，Pannonian Avars N+R1aI：Some Slavic peoples，Finns，Hungarians，Latvians，Estonians，Balts，Bashkirs，Shorians，Tatars. R1aR1b+I：Ukrainian, Czechs, Bulgarians, Russians Haplogroup I is the oldest major haplogroup in Europe The national groups of Eastern Europe are characterized by dominant haplogroups R1a/ Slavs or I2, while those of Western Europe are characterized by dominant haplogroups R1b or I1 The first settlers I1+I2 The second group of settlers R1b The third group of settlers R1a+N1a 4，The modern Turkic people are a mixture of Eurasian People. These includes Indo-Iranian (R1az93+J2)and Indo-European tribes of Central Asia who becomes Turkic for 2000 years ago. O2a+C2 enter Central Asia and became the Central Asian Turks：Kazakhs and Kyrgyzs "Origin of "Proto-Altaic" language=Turkic+Mongolic+Tungusic+Uralic+Koreanic+Japonic" R1 dominates Indo-European languages R1a dominant Slavs + Indo-Iranians (Pashtuns, Iranians, Indians) R1b dominant Western European Q dominates Native American，Inuit people, Yenisei people N dominates Urals and Yakutia O dominate Japanese Korean Chinese C2 dominates Mongolian Kazakh Tungusic

@@user-rn6nb2ey7e that's what exactly what i means , turkic carry Q while other asian don't carry at all , they may be a mix of the different waves of people who migrate north .

In Iraq, too, there is talk of Azerbaijan

@@acjfrk5464 yes, in Kərkük there's more rh han a million azerbaijanis, that still speaks to each other in their mother tongue

@Elvin Bağırlı Yes, in Kirkuk there are Turks, but I am from Tal Afar.

I wish so

Yeah

Most people think like that

Cus Babur Shah

@@papazataklaattiranimam yeah but the people of punjab and modern day Pakistan didn’t speak chagatai or other Turkic languages.

❤❤❤

There should be hatched. There are so many Kurdish speakers but there are Turkish speakers to.

And we call dumplings same in Turkish Korean and Mongolian “mantı- mandu”

@@fundacure2832 even russians calls it so, manti. 😁

turkic word for Book is the same as chinese too. Not surprising as the turks lived just north of china for most of its history til recently. Chinese adopted from Turks too like the Chinese word Chengli and Tian(heaven) is from Turkic Tengri(Heaven/God)

Not even phonetically close to Turkish or other Turkic

@@aboba5995 they are talking about etymology of the word not the phonetic of the languages dummy lmao

700-800 bc

It was first documented around 500 b.c. By the chinese. Obviously it existed long before that, but since the proto turks were nomads with no writing system it wasnt documented earlier.

@@xanshen9011 So in that case, was the language of the Mongols documented in 700 BC?

Mongolic peoples didn’t even exist before 600 AD

This guy even thinks Para-Mongolic is not different from Mongolic🤣

Azerbaijani spoken in iran since seljuks.

Yes, by people, palace and military.

Yes they should have painted whole of iran aswell.The name İran popularized by Turks and later mongols because its more inclusive.

@@YY-ug9mv lol 🤣Turkish was only a small part of the court ... Not the whole country of Iran ... The Persian people spoke .You expect it to color the whole of Iran for a small part .So were the Mongol governments

Turkish was only a small part of the court ... Not the whole country of Iran ... The Persian people spoke .You expect it to color the whole of Iran for a small part .

It's wrong. Yakuts were genetically formed at 12-13-th century in modern territory. So proto-yakut came 5-10 centuries

Yeah, they were settled around Lake Baikal first. Gokturks named them "Kurykan"s. They migrated to north because of the Mongol invasion (especially Buryads) and then they started to mix with other natives.

@@born_this_way no, both Buryats and Yakuts has partial Kurikan ancestry. While Yakuts has a large Saka ancestry from the Enisesn region and local Yakut Ewenki intermixing. Buryats are mix of Kurykans and Bayurku people. The genetic and archaeology evidence proves this theory

@@Genso326 Hey what do you think about Kurikan and Bayurku? Do u believe them Turkic or Mongolic? I and Buryat historians believe them Xiongnu descent Mongolic tribes. Proto Buryats were known as Barga they spoken Mongolic also even Yakut language isn’t fully Turkic but consist 30%Mongolic vocabulary. Though most of scholars consider Bayirku/Kurikan tribes as turkic since they just doing simplification cause it was part of Tiele union so it must be « turkic ».

@@barguttobedboth Kurikan and Baeyrku migrated at some point from the eastern areas. It is difficult to tell what language family they belonged too, as there were no language samples left.

Probably Ordos. Xinglongwa culture

I hate turans

@@user-md9pl9ly9j Do not be afraid! Nobody will hurt you.You can eat bat with peace of mind.

@@user-md9pl9ly9j we are not Turanians. Turanians are eastern caucasian iranians. Eastern Turanians were mixed with Turks. So eastern Turanians were half east-asian.

@@Raidon8537 turan ismi irani kökenliymiş sanırım neden turan diyorlar ki bize

@@born_this_way doğu iranilerden kalma terim işte bu.